Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Green Party call new immigration propaganda ‘made up nonsense’

Published

on

green party

green party

Far-right propaganda outlets are salivating over a new immigration report from an investment bank – that’s mainly because it fearmongers about the Green Party, which has been surging in recent months and presenting a real challenge to Reform UK.

Because the actual report isn’t public, it can’t face proper outside scrutiny. But as a Green spokesperson insisted:

These figures are made up nonsense and we’ve been given no idea how they are calculated.

Green Party: ‘we won’t scapegoat migrants’

The report comes from Simon French, the “chief economist at Panmure Liberum”, which calls itself “the UK’s largest Independent Investment Bank”. And it claims that a Green election win in 2029 would push the country’s population from around 71.5 million to 75.9 million by 2034 (via net migration of about 900,000 a year).

French is a Times columnist who previously worked in government and “had a central role” in pushing through cuts. And he once wrote about “taking a chainsaw to red tape”. But right-wing rags hope we’ll just accept his estimates on immigration numbers without any scrutiny (as they did themselves).

Advertisement

The Green Party has refused to do so, though. Because a spokesperson told the Telegraph that, while it’s “not at all clear” how French got his figures, it looks like he based them:

apparently, on an ‘open borders’ approach, which is not our current policy

They stressed that:

The Greens support a fair and managed migration system – successive governments have presided over a broken and unjust system.

Responding to the Mail, meanwhile, a Green spokesperson placed the focus firmly on economic injustice, saying:

People are concerned about the impacts of immigration because of a massive affordability crisis, but unlike other parties we won’t scapegoat migrants for the unfairness created by our rigged economic system.

An investment bank wouldn’t want you railing against the economic system, would it?

Despite not knowing where French got his numbers from, we do know that even the Tories brought net migration up to 944,000 in 2023. So even if we believed French’s prediction, it wouldn’t be the kind of number the UK has never seen before.

Advertisement

It’s important to remember, of course, that people from other countries contribute strongly to our economy (something the Green Party has openly insisted). It’s also important to remember why immigration happens at all. Because as the Canary has previously explained, the UK has:

  • An ageing population.
  • Low birth rates.
  • Skills shortages.
  • A massive underinvestment problem.
  • A longstanding addiction to destructive interference abroad which has played a big part in pushing people out of their homes in the first place.

As Green Party leader Zack Polanski has made completely clear, the focus of our rage should not be on ordinary people seeking a new life in the UK. It should be on the putrid economic system that, for at least five decades, has been decimating communities across the country via public spending cuts, with devastating consequences.

In December 2025, Polanski insisted:

We shouldn’t have a race to the bottom on migration. We should have a race to the top on public services!

He’s absolutely right. But investment banks and elitist propaganda outlets are happy with the way the current economic system works, so it shouldn’t surprise us in the slightest that they prefer to spread hate and fear rather than compassion and hope.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Ed Sykes

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Greens’ Makerfield candidate withdraws after Israel lobby pile-on

Published

on

Former Makerfield candidate Chris Kennedy

Former Makerfield candidate Chris Kennedy

Chris Kennedy has withdrawn as the Green party’s candidate in the Makerfield by-election. The party’s announcement describes the reason as “personal and family reasons”. However, it is notable that Kennedy was the target of a huge pile-on by the UK Israel lobby before his withdrawal for sharing a post describing the the attack on Golders Green ambulances as a false-flag attack.

Kennedy apologised and deleted the comment.

Makerfield: worrying sign

The efforts the Israel lobby made to drive out a left-wing candidate are another worrying indication about Burnham’s candidacy. It suggests that Israel advocates want to help Burnham win so they can extract a ‘quid pro quo’ for one of their number, Josh Simons, resigning as Makerfield’s MP to open the way for him.

The withdrawal could well be another example of the Greens’ increasing tendency to cave to lobby attacks rather than stand their ground over Israel’s genocide, other crimes and propaganda tactics.

Advertisement

Featured image via Getty/Ryan Jenkinson

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Danny Dyer Teases Rivals Season 2 ‘Full-Frontal’ Nude Scene

Published

on

Katherine Parkinson and Danny Dyer in the new season of Rivals

Danny Dyer has teased that he will appear in a “full-frontal” scene later in the current season of Rivals.

The Bafta winner plays fan-favourite Freddie Jones in the Disney+ bonkbuster, which returned after a two-year absence last week.

While promoting season two, Danny told Radio Times: “I go full frontal in this series, if they keep it in the edit.”

Since it premiered in 2024, Rivals has become renowned for its racy content including graphic scenes of sex and nudity.

Advertisement

Danny added: “Nobody’s under pressure to be naked if they don’t want to, but if a woman’s getting her breasts out, why shouldn’t I get it all out?”

“I’ve got breasts as well, to be fair,” he then quipped.

Opening up more about the scene in question to Digital Spy, Danny explained: “It’s an odd thing to do. You sign up for this. It’s part of it.

“Nobody’s forced to [do it]. It’s Jilly [Cooper, who wrote the books that Rivals is based on].”

Advertisement

He observed that his co-star Katherine Parkinson is also “quite naked” in the scene “and so are a lot of other actors in it”.

Katherine Parkinson and Danny Dyer in the new season of Rivals
Katherine Parkinson and Danny Dyer in the new season of Rivals

Katherine agreed: “So many of us are doing those sorts of scenes that it becomes normalised. It’s only after the job stops you go: ‘Oh, my goodness, I did that’.

“[It’s] all done in the spirit of Jilly. It’s always telling a story.”

She added: “That’s actually a very funny scene – not because of [Danny’s] full-frontal-ness – but because of what’s happening in the scene.”

Season two of Rivals kicked off in the show’s typically raunchy fashion, with full-frontal nudity from two new characters in the first 15 minutes, and an Aidan Turner naked moment also opening the door to a certain unexpected EastEnders cameo.

Advertisement

Episode four of Rivals arrived on Disney+ on Friday morning, with two more coming in the weeks ahead.

After that, the show will take a mid-season break, with the rest of Rivals’ second season following later in the year.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

5 Appliances To Avoid Plugging Into An Extension Lead

Published

on

5 Appliances To Avoid Plugging Into An Extension Lead

I’ll be the first to admit I assumed you could plug most things into an extension lead – but it turns out, I was wrong. Plugging in certain appliances could be a major fire hazard, according to safety experts.

In the UK, around 7,000 house fires are caused by faulty electrics, appliances, wiring and overloaded sockets every year.

Some common household appliances can take too much power for a standard extension lead to handle safely.

According to The LED Specialist, the riskiest items to plug into extension leads are kettles, electric heaters and toasters.

Advertisement

The reason comes down to wattage. Kettles can draw around 3,000 watts of power, electric heaters can match or even exceed that figure, and toasters typically pull between 800 and 1,500 watts, the experts said.

When multiple high-wattage devices are running through a single extension lead at the same time, the combined load can quickly exceed what the lead can safely handle.

In April, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service shared on social media that they’d attended a call where an electric heater had been plugged into an extension lead, which began overheating.

“Thankfully, the fault was found before a fire started,” they said, adding that extension leads aren’t safe for high-powered items such as heaters, electric fires, or large kitchen appliances.

Advertisement

It goes without saying then that plugging your washing machine or tumble dryer into an extension lead is not a good idea either.

Oliver Nichols, from The LED Specialist, said: “People often don’t realise how much current these devices pull, and when you combine more than one on a single lead, you’re creating a real fire risk.”

Experts say these devices should always be plugged directly into a wall socket instead.

Check your extension lead is safe

Advertisement

Another issue to consider when plugging in appliances is whether the extension lead you’re using is safe.

Experts warn some of these products can be missing the important safety markings and built-in fuses that UK-standard leads are required to carry.

According to BEAMA – the trade association for energy infrastructure and systems – extension leads should be CE marked (otherwise they’re deemed non-compliant).

You should also check there are no imperfections in the plastic mouldings, that it doesn’t rattle when you shake it, that there are no signs of damage to the cable or plug, and that the cable length is as advertised.

Advertisement

“If your extension lead doesn’t carry the appropriate safety markings, there’s no guarantee it will cut out before overheating. That’s when you move from an inconvenience to a genuine fire hazard,” said Nichols.

And if you’re regularly relying on extension leads throughout your home, it might be worth getting a qualified electrician in to add more sockets.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ladies First Reviews: Critics Slam Netflix’s ‘Dated’ Sacha Baron Cohen Comedy

Published

on

Critics definitely aren't laughing at Sacha Baron Cohen's new comedy

When the trailer for the new Netflix comedy film Ladies First dropped, it quickly raised eyebrows, with some critics going as far as calling it “the worst movie trailer” the had “ever seen”.

And let’s just say the response isn’t any better now that the film has landed on streaming services, with a smattering of one- and two-star reviews.

Ladies First stars Sacha Baron Cohen as a chauvinistic CEO whose life is upended when he wakes up in a parallel world dominated by women.

Despite an all-star cast which includes Rosamund Pike, Fiona Shaw, Charles Dance and Emily Mortimer, the film is getting negative reviews across the board.

Advertisement

Critics are calling out the film’s subpar jokes, borderline-offensive gender politics and misuse of its talented British cast.

Here is what people are saying about Ladies First…

“In its attempt to become a one-stop shop for just about every form of nostalgia possible, Netflix has now decided to revive the dreadful British comedy of the 2000s.

The all-deciding algorithm has somehow deemed it necessary for a return to that cursed era with the release of Ladies First, a broad and chintzy new comedy that would have felt old hat even back then.

Advertisement

“It’s an excruciatingly unfunny high-concept thought experiment, imagining a world with flipped gender politics, that’s far too happy with itself and what it’s allegedly achieving to be passed off as just some charming throwback.”

“This a film that attempts to wring side-splitting laughter from the wacky, dystopian sight of, ho-ho, women taxi drivers, women paramedics and women changing tyres. Plus, equally hilarious are the scenes featuring, snicker snicker, men cooking, men hugging and men being interested in their children. Finger off the pulse? Just a bit.”

Critics definitely aren't laughing at Sacha Baron Cohen's new comedy
Critics definitely aren’t laughing at Sacha Baron Cohen’s new comedy

“A dated battle-of-the-sexes comedy […] at a time when laws change daily to restrict women’s bodily autonomy, protect men from accountability and reinstate antiquated values that benefit a few at the expense of the many, sexual politics can feel more regressive than ever.

“But as uneven a playing field as women may face against men in their lives, relationships and careers, Ladies First is a movie that seems like it’s made less for this moment than one a few generations ago.”

“This comic tale of an arrogant, sexist male executive who gets his comeuppance when he hits his head and wakes up to find himself in a world dominated by women hits every satirical note you’d expect but provides more knowing chuckles than genuine laughs.

Advertisement

“An almost ridiculously overqualified cast of notable British thespians does their best to elevate the material of this Netflix comedy directed by Thea Sharrock but it’s heavy lifting.”

“The easy feminism of winks and role reversals quickly wears thin. Most of the movie takes place in Damien’s head after all, and much of its lessons are about his growth. Why does that sound so familiar?”

We're not sure what's happening in this scene from Ladies First and we're not sure we want to know
We’re not sure what’s happening in this scene from Ladies First and we’re not sure we want to know

Sacha Baron Cohen is knocked unconscious early in Netflix comedy Ladies First, a film that only sometimes makes you wish the same for yourself.”

“Men and women both will find a number of alarming concepts in the gender-flipping comedy Ladies First not the least of which will be the idea of Sacha Baron Cohen as a romantic lead.

“He’s a terrific actor. Whether he has the animal magnetism to play opposite Rosamund Pike (who does?) strains credulity. But so does most of the movie.”

Advertisement

Ladies First is now streaming on Netflix.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Released Gaza flotilla abductees raped, signs of torture

Published

on

flotilla

flotilla

Content warning: contains graphic images of torture and abuse

The first Flotilla volunteers criminally abducted week by Israel as they sailed to Gaza with humanitarian supplies have begun to make their way home after deportation. They show horrific signs of torture and violence at the hands of their evil, supremacist captors.  Brazilian activist Thiago Avila detailed how many flotilla volunteers suffered rape and other sexual violence:

The Freedom Flotilla said in a statement:

The horrific assault on flotilla volunteers must be understood in the broader context of an entrenched system of violence in which Israeli soldiers, police, and prison guards have long operated with impunity. Sexual violence, including rape, gang-rape, humiliating strip searches, and other forms of sexual torture, has been repeatedly committed against Palestinians in Israeli custody and documented by Israeli, Palestinian, and international human rights organizations.

The marks of torture were clearly visible on those willing to show them:

Advertisement

Flotilla: white faces = a little media interest

The UK and most other Western governments have remained shamefully silent about Israel’s kidnapping, humiliation and torture of their citizens. There is the slightest sign of interest among some ‘mainstream’ media outlets, but far from enough. Their hypocrisy and cowardice was deftly mocked by author Michael Rosen. Soon after the abductions, fascist ‘security’ minister Itamar Ben-Gvir posted footage of his attempts to humiliate and intimidate the captives. On his Facebook page, Rosen pointed out that the evils of the likes of Ben-Gvir have caught media interest only because some of those being abused are white:

But Israel has spent years inflicting far worse on the Palestinians, to destroy or drive them out. More than ten thousand Palestinians are currently held without trial, beaten, tortured, raped and often killed, as international law professor Laurent Lambert pointed out in response to the flotilla images:

Israel is a colonial terror outpost masquerading as a state.

Featured image via Getty/Uriel Sinai

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

EHRC Trans Guidance Compared To Trump’s America Policies

Published

on

EHRC Trans Guidance Compared To Trump's America Policies

New guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has been slammed by campaigners for being “exclusionary” and weakening wider LGBTQ+ protections.

The equalities watchdog has ruled that single-sex spaces, like changing rooms and toilets, can only be used on the basis of biological sex.

It states transgender people should instead use a third or a gender-neutral space.

It also warns that leaving the community without access to any services or facilities would be unlikely to be proportionate and could be discriminatory.

Advertisement

The EHRC’s delayed code of practice comes after the Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act refers to biological sex in 2025.

Councils, NHS trusts and businesses had postponed updating their policies on how to accommodate for single-sex spaces while waiting for the EHRC advice.

MPs and peers now have 40 days to raise their own concerns about the advice before it becomes statutory.

However, campaign groups have warned that this is a step backwards for LGBTQ+ rights.

Advertisement

Trans+ Solidarity Alliance director Alexandra Parmar-Yee said: “The law here is a mess, and clearly many businesses will just go gender neutral to avoid the headache, but the government risks pushing trans people yet further out of public life.

“This guidance is going to be a Section 28 moment for this Labour government, defining their legacy on LGBTQ+ rights.

“It’s the sort of trans rights policy we would expect from Trump’s America, and is worryingly similar to a US bathroom ban condemned by the UK foreign office in 2016.”

The second Trump administration has focused on restricting transgender rights, including attempts to block gender-affirming care and refusing federal funding for single-sex facilities that are not segregated by biological sex.

Advertisement

Parmar-Yee added: “While some language has been softened, the same exclusionary core remains.

“Treating trans people like this puts the UK outside the international human rights norm, and the right thing for Labour to do here would be to urgently legislate to clarify Parliament’s original intent for trans equality.”

Similarly, TransActual said: “The newly published EHRC Code of Practice leaves trans people in the UK today with less rights than they had prior to last year’s Supreme Court ruling.

“Not only does this new guidance fail to protect the rights and dignity of transgender people, but appears to have weakened protections for the LGBTQ+ community as a whole.

Advertisement

“Rather than engage with our community with respect, the government has instead withheld publishing its new Code of Practice until as late as possible.

“TransActual will continue to fight for equal access to public life for all trans people, and will publish our full thoughts on the new Code once we have had the time to properly scrutinise it – something that the government seems keen to avoid.”

The Women and Equalities Unit has been contacted for comment.

After announcing the guidance, women and equalities minister Bridget Phillipson said: “The Equality Act enshrines our rights in law so that people can live free from discrimination and harassment.

Advertisement

“Our focus has always been making sure organisations have clear, accessible guidance on how to implement the law.

“I thank the EHRC for their work updating the draft code of practice, and look forward to continuing to work with them to ensure people’s rights are upheld across our country.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Help and support:

Advertisement
  • The Gender Trust supports anyone affected by gender identity | 01527 894 838
  • Mermaids offers information, support, friendship and shared experiences for young people with gender identity issues | 0208 1234819
  • LGBT Youth Scotland is the largest youth and community-based organisation for LGBT people in Scotland. Text 07786 202 370
  • Gires provides information for trans people, their families and professionals who care for them | 01372 801554
  • Depend provides support, advice and information for anyone who knows, or is related to, a transsexual person in the UK

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House | The Hunt To Uncover The History Of A Mysterious Old Parliamentary Board Game

Published

on

The Hunt To Uncover The History Of A Mysterious Old Parliamentary Board Game
The Hunt To Uncover The History Of A Mysterious Old Parliamentary Board Game


5 min read

After chancing upon an old parliamentary board game, Daniel Brittain persuaded two hereditary peers to join battle

Advertisement

There was something about it that wasn’t quite like the other chess boards piled in a corner as if hiding. It was the day after Boxing Day and I was idling in a favourite shop in the town of Corbridge, between Newcastle and Hexham. With little else to do, I investigated and so stumbled on an artefact at once trivial and timely. For instead of the regulation black and white squares, this board carried slogans such as One Man One Vote, Home Rule and Abolition of the Lords.

What was this? The front of the board proclaimed it to be House of Commons – The New Parliamentary Game. New it might once have been: the packaging suggested that it had not been new for at least a century.

Delight at unearthing this piece of parliamentary ephemera was tempered by the fact that were no playing pieces – and no rules. Further investigation was needed. I handed over my £3 and embarked on the quest.

The first point of inquiry after the Christmas recess was Patrick Vollmer, chief librarian of the Lords. Did this game exist in the parliamentary archives, a virgin copy kept in one of its vaults?

Advertisement

No, but he did pass on some leads to chase. A website for board game geeks gave the rules (extraordinarily complicated), and more surprisingly a link to the Bodleian Library, surely the repository of historic and valuable manuscripts? True, but also it turns out the home of 1,600 games and pastimes gifted this century. And there it was, on the Bodleian website, a photo of five of the eight required playing pieces, featuring pictures of prominent Liberal and Conservative MPs and peers from the game’s 1896 creation.

Jo Maddocks, the Bodleian’s curator of ephemera invited us (my wife Clare had by now joined the quest) up to Oxford to take a look, where we discovered that although the library has some of the playing pieces it doesn’t possess the rules or the board. We reunited them all for photos. Asquith, Campbell-Bannerman, Rosebery, Devonshire and Chamberlain re-emerged into the limelight. Turned out we were the first people to have requested a view.

Earl of Lytton and the Earl of Clancarty
Earl of Lytton and the Earl of Clancarty 

Back in Parliament, a plan was hatched to play the game, possibly for the first time in 100 years. Given that ‘Abolition of the Lords’ (in its all hereditary form) is one of the squares on the board, two hereditaries were my obvious target.

While Clare brilliantly copied the Bodleian pieces and made the required additional three, I went on the trail of game hereditary peers. Fortuitously, the Earl of Clancarty was enthusiastic, and he was about to meet up with the Earl of Lytton. A brace of earls, result!

Advertisement

A week later we gathered in one of the splendid rooms formerly part of the Lord Chancellor’s flat. For Lord Lytton, Parliament’s foremost expert on Planning and Building law, it was a special day (his last in the Lords), having decided a year ago to retire at 75. The minister, Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, had paid tribute to him. Opposite: Lord Clancarty a prominent champion of the arts and the creative industries. He’s just discovered that he is to be one of the few outgoing hereditaries to  receive a life peerage. Both crossbenchers, Lord Clancarty gamely took the governing Tories’ side, Lord Lytton the opposition Liberals. Shaking hands, the game commenced.

Poor old backbench pawns move just one square at a time

Of course, the object of the game is for the government to pass acts on the subjects depicted on the board by landing a player on each of the two similarly named squares. The opposition’s job is to prevent that. According to the rules, the PM and what the board refers to as the Chief Opposition Spokesman can move in all directions across the board, while his cabinet and their shadows (a term formalised in the 1920s) rather fewer. Poor old backbench pawns move just one square at a time.

Advertisement

Let battle commence. First bill? Abolition of the Lords of course. Lord Lytton scored an early victory in saving the House; on the rematch Lord Clancarty got it abolished. Soon a whole radical manifesto was laid before them: licensing laws, payment of MPs, Home Rule, disestablishment and voting rights. It’s a fun game, perhaps the parliamentary shops should bring out a new edition?

Having reached an honourable draw, the two earls went their way. Lord Clancarty to a meeting, Lord Lytton heading off for a last stint in the Chamber, say his goodbyes and clear his desk after some 30 years. As the politician playing pieces were packed away, I noticed that all the measures on the board have been tackled since the game’s creation. All except one: Disestablishment of the Church of England. That thorny question has even managed to outlive the hereditaries in the House of Lords. 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House | Fit For Service? Royal Navy Fitness Test Pass Rates Fall Sharply Over Last Decade

Published

on

Fit For Service? Royal Navy Fitness Test Pass Rates Fall Sharply Over Last Decade
Fit For Service? Royal Navy Fitness Test Pass Rates Fall Sharply Over Last Decade

Officers at work on the bridge of HMS Dragon as it sails into Limassol, Cyprus, 27 April 2026 (Photography, LPhot Helayna Birkett. UK MOD © Crown copyright 2026)


6 min read

The Iran conflict has drawn attention to gaps in Royal Navy capability but, as Tom Scotson finds, it’s not just its ships that need to get into better shape

Advertisement

In the early days of the Iran conflict, as UK allies in the Gulf – and even Cyprus – were being hit by drones and missiles, Keir Starmer pledged to send a warship to help defend them.

The only problem was the only available vessel, HMS Dragon, was undergoing a refit in Portsmouth. The effort to get the ship ready was extraordinary but there was no escaping the embarrassment.

The Royal Navy has been the object of ridicule from US secretary of war Pete Hegseth and, repeatedly, Donald Trump himself. It is widely acknowledged that the UK has an inadequate number of warships currently available, with new frigates only coming into service at the end of the decade.

Advertisement

But a navy is about more than its vessels – and data uncovered by The House suggests that not all is well with its personnel.

On the face of it, the health of the Royal Navy is improving after decades of cuts. By January 2026, it was reported that there had been a 14.5 per cent uptick in the numbers of people joining the navy, with the fleet boasting a strength of around 32,160 personnel.

But according to a Freedom of Information request made by The House, the number of personnel who passed their fitness tests between 2014 and 2024 fell dramatically.

 Between 2014 and 2015, 96.6 per cent of both men and women in the fleet passed their fitness tests on first attempt. However, 10 years later only 77 per cent of people passed the exams initially – a drop of almost 20 percentage points.

Advertisement

The number of Royal Navy personnel who failed their fitness tests at the first time of asking but passed within a year increased from 21 people to 1,219, 10 years later. Meanwhile, the same data found that Royal Navy personnel who failed their fitness tests on their first attempt then passed more than a year later rose from six people in 2014 to 86 a decade later.

As the navy grapples with falling standards and recruitment shortfalls, how can it restore and improve standards within its ranks?

Fred Thomas, Labour MP for Plymouth Moor View and a former Royal Marines officer, tells The House why he believes the numbers have declined.

“The overall offer was eroded year by year under the Conservative Party when they heavily cut funding,” he says. “The combined total of: how enjoyable is the job, what does it pay, what perks do you get including housing and medical benefits, how much status does it confer in society? How proud are you of your work for the navy and what sacrifices are you willing to make for the job?

Advertisement

“This will sound political but they hollowed out the military and it’s in a bad place now. It’ll take many years to turn it around. And at the same time we desperately need to modernise our capabilities.”

Many of the navy’s problems do not emanate from just cash flow problems either. Experts argue that in an increasingly competitive job market there are more careers out there which attract people’s interest – whether they be easier or more glamorous.

Commodore (Ret’d) Steve Prest, Rusi associate fellow, says people join the navy for one reason and that is it is better than the alternatives.

He adds: “Now it is different because young people, especially, often don’t want to be away and disconnected. A recent patrol had submariners away for 205 days under water, where they don’t have the ability to send information off the submarine. In the modern era, people expect to remain connected; when they see a blue tick, they expect a response instantaneously.

“It’s not to say a career in the Royal Navy is not rewarding. I know of people who were recently on that trip and thought it was one of the best things they ever did. It’s just harder to persuade people to go into the navy when everywhere else is so connected.”

Advertisement

Prest admits numbers have gone up a little, as recruitment has improved – despite the trained strength in the fleet having dropped. This means that the overall experience in the navy has reduced, with experienced staff leaving faster than the experience which can be grown in newcomers.

This will sound political but they hollowed out the military and it’s in a bad place now. It’ll take many years to turn it around

“With limited opportunities for people to gain sea experience, owing to the paucity of seagoing vessels, this is a real concern,” Prest tells The House.

 “It means the ships’ companies bringing the new-build frigates into service will be vastly less experienced than their predecessors.

Advertisement

“We need a more balanced pipeline. The new recruits all need time at sea and interesting places to visit. There are no shortcuts to learning under those who know the ropes.”

The navy has also been affected by falling wages, which have cut across the public sector.

From day one, new officer recruits earn £34,676 per year. This will increase to £41,456 after their first promotion, followed by £52,815 as a lieutenant. The highest captain within the fleet will earn £122,849.

With a healthy pension and access to subsidised accommodation, the offer on the face of it looks good. Yet the problem is two-fold: talented people can earn far more in the private sector, in blossoming careers such as software engineering and coding; secondly, experts say demand is still depressed from cuts inflicted during austerity.

Advertisement

Admiral Lord West, former first sea lord and chief of the Naval Staff from 2002 to 2006, says: “Part of the problem is there was no pressure to recruit more people, the manpower was cut. When you depress something it’s difficult to try and bring it up to the same level again.”

He tells The House that the bottom line is that there is not enough money for the MoD – like most government departments.

And without greater investment, existing naval talent is going to waste, warns Prest: “If we don’t have enough ships to get them out on missions, then we can lose some of the best recruits as they idle ashore – that’s not what they joined to do.” 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Even Starmer is now campaigning to get Starmer out

Published

on

Starmer Burnham

Starmer Burnham

Keir Starmer has said he is going to Makerfield to campaign for Andy Burnham in the manufactured by-election there. And he says he wants everyone else to do the same, no matter what “other discussions are going on”. In doing so, he has become the first PM in history to campaign for his own removal:

Backfire

The messaging is most likely an attempt by Starmer to project strength, while secretly banking on Burnham to lose and save Starmer’s skin. In fact, given Starmer’s massive public unpopularity and his record of driving voters away in by-elections, his appearance in Makerfield is probably a direct sabotage attempt.

Advertisement

But given the weakness and awfulness of any MPs currently hoping to ‘challenge’ Starmer, it may backfire. Voters seeing Starmer will be acutely reminded that voting in Burnham is their only realistic hope of getting rid of the Brylcreemed blancmange before 2029.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Green Candidate In Makerfield By-Election Quits After 12 Hours

Published

on

Former Green Party Candidate Chris Kennedy poses for a portrait at Low Hall Nature Reserve on May 21, 2026 in Wigan, England.
Former Green Party Candidate Chris Kennedy poses for a portrait at Low Hall Nature Reserve on May 21, 2026 in Wigan, England.Former Green Party Candidate Chris Kennedy poses for a portrait at Low Hall Nature Reserve on May 21, 2026 in Wigan, England.

The Greens’ candidate for the Makerfield by-election has quit after less than 12 hours in the role.

The party said Chris Kennedy, a nurse and children’s safeguarding specialist, stood down for “personal and family reasons”.

The Greens are now looking for nominations for new candidates before the by-election on June 18.

Shortly after the news broke, The Times reported Kennedy had shared social media posts describing an attack on Jewish ambulances in north London as a “false flag” operation.

An Instagram video described the attack as “total bullshit to keep the false flag flying” and included an image where parts of the word “Jewish” had been blacked out.

Advertisement

Kennedy also shared a post from Hugh Anthony, who describes himself as a “proud ethno-nationalist”, which claimed the Golders Green terror attack made “no sense”.

A Green Party spokesperson told The Times that Kennedy “apologises for the offence caused” and had deleted the posts.

A party representative told the BBC the posts “don’t reflect the views of The Green Party”.

When announcing Kennedy’s decision to stand down, a Green spokesperson said: “We wish Chris the best and understand that family has to come first.

Advertisement

“As a party, we are re-opening nominations now because we believe people in Makerfield deserve a real choice at this by-election, and the Green Party will be standing to offer exactly that.

“Across the country, more and more voters are turning away from the old parties and looking for politicians who will genuinely stand up for their communities.

“We will also be redoubling our efforts on campaigning to expose the risk of Reform, a party who seeks to divide our communities.

“This election has to be about how to make the super-rich pay their fair share, how we tackle the cost-of-living crisis with lower bills and affordable housing, and how we protect our public services and our green spaces.

Advertisement

“It has to be about offering Makerfield hope over hate.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025