Connect with us

Politics

The House Opinion Article | The Tories will not recover by working with Reform

Published

on

The Tories will not recover by working with Reform
The Tories will not recover by working with Reform


4 min read

History shows that the Conservatives succeed when they focus on the economy and the centre ground.

Advertisement

The 2024 general election was a shattering defeat for the Conservative Party, and recovery from a political disaster on that scale takes time. After Tony Blair’s landslide win in 1997, it took years, not months, before voters were willing to listen to anything the Conservatives were saying.

By sheer force of personality, Kemi Badenoch pushed her personal poll standing higher than any of her rival party leaders. A reputation for honest answers and plain speaking is a big political asset. (While Andy Burnham, benefiting from a political honeymoon, now rivals her ratings, we will have to see whether his popularity survives difficult budgetary choices in the months ahead). But the Conservatives lag well behind their leader in terms of public opinion.

To return to government, the Conservatives have to win back the support of millions of people who stayed at home or voted for other parties in 2024.

Doing that will indeed mean regaining the confidence of large numbers who abandoned the Conservatives for Reform. But that will not be enough.

Advertisement

Two years ago, roughly equal numbers of 2019 Conservatives defected to a more left-wing party – Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens – as shifted to Reform. A further large number of former Tories stayed at home and did not vote.

In 2019, 17 out of 21 constituencies in the three Thames Valley counties (Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire) returned a Conservative MP. In 2024, only three out of 24 constituencies did so. The 2024 election saw the number of Conservative MPs in Surrey drop from eleven to six. Those lost seats are not going to be won back by trying to outdo Reform or Restore.

Badenoch’s forthright and repeated rejection of any kind of pact or deal with Reform, whether before or after the next general election, is therefore both principled and politically wise

Advertisement

Voters are individuals. You can’t just add up the votes of rival parties and assume that an alliance between them would deliver the sum of those voting totals. This is where the theory that British politics these days is about voter movement within either a left or a right bloc breaks down.

Again and again, polling shows that a big chunk of Reform voters would never support a Conservative candidate. Likewise, not only opinion polls, but actual votes cast in the recent Greater Manchester mayoral by-election show that many Conservatives reject the idea of transferring their support to Reform, even as a second choice, and a sizeable minority of Tories are willing to opt tactically for a Labour or Lib Dem candidate to stop Reform winning.

Badenoch’s forthright and repeated rejection of any pact or deal with Reform, whether before or after the next general election, is therefore both principled and politically wise.

Advertisement

Winning back votes from both left and right certainly looks a tall order. But it is far from a hopeless cause. For example, a study by the think tank Onward shows that former Conservative supporters who went Reform and those who switched to Lib Dem both wanted to see effective immigration controls.

Nor is it an accident that the rise in Badenoch’s personal ratings began with her 2025 conference speech, which focused almost exclusively on the economy. There is a tremendous opportunity for the Conservatives to re-establish themselves as the party that champions wealth creation, enterprise, limited but effective government, personal responsibility and equality of opportunity. The Tories can contrast such an approach with Labour’s naive faith in state intervention and Reform’s incoherent approach to economic policy and preference for performative anger over practical solutions.

A clear and sustained focus on economic policy – provided it is combined with a willingness to be frank about the difficult choices and trade-offs that will be necessary to promote economic growth, and equip us to adapt to the technological revolution that is transforming industry and employment throughout the world – is what will give the Conservative Party its best chance to regain public trust.

The keys to Tory survival and success over more than two centuries have been their ability to adapt to social and economic change and their skill in building a broad coalition of supporters stretching from the centre to the democratic right. 

Advertisement

That is what we need to do again.

 

David Lidington is a distinguished fellow at RUSI and a former Conservative MP and Cabinet minister

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

How Average Are You In The UK?

Published

on

INFJ Is The Rarest, 'Easily Misunderstood' Personality Type

Most of us think we’re better-looking and smarter than the average. And on the flip side, research suggests that many in the UK’s top 10% of earners think they’re getting middling pay.

Something about being labelled “average” seems hard for us to accept, even though, by nature, it’s the most likely position we’ll end up in; thinking you’re not normal might be the most ordinary assumption we have.

Then again, average is only a midpoint. Most of us will be in the top half of some metrics and in the bottom for others.

So, we thought we’d find the average of 22 measures across the UK – so now you can see how you really stand up.

Advertisement

Money

1) Salary

The median annual salary in the UK is £31,584 in 2026.

2) Debt (without mortgage)

Advertisement

In 2024, the median outstanding non-mortgage debt in the UK was £6,300 including student loans and £2,500 without student loans.

3) Rent

In 2025, average private rent in the UK was £1,424 in England, £822 in Wales, £1,018 in Scotland, and £873 in Northern Ireland.

4) Savings

Advertisement

In the UK, a Finder survey found the average savings by age in 2026 was:

  • 18-24 – £2,699
  • 25-34 – £11,023
  • 35-44 – £13,379
  • 45-54 – £12,452
  • 55+ – £33,420.

5) Monthly mortgage payment

That averages out to £1,355 in the UK in 2026.

Body

6) Height

Advertisement

In 2024, the UK average height was:

  • 175.8 centimeters (just over 5’9”) for adult men,
  • 162.1 centimeters (just under 5’4”) for adult women.

7) Sex frequency

On average, sexually adult Brits have sex 1.1 times a week.

8) Exercise habits

Almost 66% of Brits exercise for an hour or more a week, but only 35% do so for three hours or more a week. 19% weight train, and 17% jog or walk.

Advertisement

9) 5k time

Most people don’t run at all. But of those that do, the UK average 5k finish times, by gender, are:

  • 38 minutes for women,
  • 29 minutes for men.

10) Hair colour

In the UK, the average hair colour is brown.

11) Eye colour

Advertisement

The UK’s most common eye colour is blue.

12) Sleep duration

The most common sleep duration in the UK is seven hours a night.

13) Sexual partners

Advertisement

YouGov put the mean self-reported number of lifetime sexual partners at four in 2023; three for women, five for men.

14) Age

15) Life expectancy

  • 83.0 years for women,
  • 79.1 years for men.

Mind

16) IQ

Advertisement

The average IQ in the UK is 101.57.

17) University degree grade

In the academic year 2024/25, the most common UK uni grade was a 2:1.

18) Books read a year

Advertisement

The median Brit reads or listens to three books a year.

Social life

19) Number of friends

Among adults, most said they have 10 friends or fewer.

Advertisement

20) Relationship status

In 2025, Statista found that most adults in England and Wales were classed as single (not married or in a civil partnership).

21) Household size

Most households in the UK have an average of 2.35 people.

Advertisement

22) Pets

More people in the UK have pets than don’t, with cats and dogs the most popular species.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Richard Osman Claims Jack Lowden Is Top Pick To Play James Bond

Published

on

Richard Osman Claims Jack Lowden Is Top Pick To Play James Bond

Richard Osman has shared some supposed insider information about the casting process for the next James Bond.

It’s now been five years since Daniel Craig hung up his tuxedo and gun for good in No Time To Die, with 007 bosses finally confirming back in May that they had officially begun the casting process for the next Bond movie.

However, according to Richard, he’s heard that a different British star is in the frame (and no it’s not the former Pointless host himself).

Instead, he reckons that Slow Horses actor Jack Lowden is the new top pick for one of cinema’s most coveted gigs.

Advertisement

Speaking on his podcast The Rest Is Entertainment, the presenter, producer and writer claimed: “Someone told me ‘for definite’ who the new Bond is the other day, but I mean that’s happened before.”

“It is definitively not a ‘he’s definitely got it’ thing,” he quickly clarified, but alleged that Jack is “definitely being strongly considered”.

He added: “I think he’d be amazing. Lowden would be an incredible Bond. He’s got real Daniel Craig energy.”

HuffPost UK has contacted reps for Amazon MGM Studios and Jack Lowden for comment.

Advertisement

In 2022, while promoting Slow Horses, Jack addressed speculation about him taking on the role of James Bond, telling AP that the rumours are “lovely”, but casting doubt on their validity.

Jack’s wife, fellow actor Saoirse Ronan, has spoken more positively about the idea, however, claiming that if it came down to one of them joining the action franchise, she’d prefer it to be him, much as she’d like to try her hand at playing a Bond villain.

Meanwhile, just last week, producer Amy Pascal gave an update on the search for the next 007 – revealing the qualities she and her colleagues are most looking for.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Won’t Julie Andrews Return For The Princess Diaries 3?

Published

on

Julie Andrews will not be returning for the third Princess Diaries movie

Julie Andrews has confirmed that she won’t be reprising her role of Queen Clarisse Renaldi in the upcoming The Princess Diaries 3.

In a recent interview with InStyle, the Mary Poppins star said she had “passed” on the chance to star in the third instalment in the Anne Hathaway film series.

The 90-year-old explained: “I think I’m retired, really, would be about the best description for that.”

Although the film’s creative team were eager to have the cinema legend return, she said she felt she had to turn them down.

Advertisement

“It was very very hard to say ‘no’,” she claimed. “But I did because I thought I had a wonderful ride, and this one I felt would flourish very well and wouldn’t need Granny going in there at my age.”

During a separate interview with The Hollywood Reporter, the Oscar winner opened up about what how she views her career now.

“I’m not completely retired,” she told the outlet. “But it’s a different kind of work that I do these days – [writing] books, and I do a lot of recording of podcasts and voiceovers. But truly, I don’t think I should be a part of [The Princess Diaries 3].”

It’s still lovely to be working on things,” she added. “That’s really the most stimulating, but not necessarily on camera.”

Advertisement

Most notably, she has lent her voice to Lady Whistledown on Netflix’s Bridgerton series in recent years, a role she completes in her at-home recording studio.

“It isn’t that I’m not enthusiastic for it. It’s just that I really don’t feel I should be part of it now,” she explained.

While we’re sad to not see Queen Clarisse arrive precisely on time for the next Princess Diaries sequel, the Sound Of Music star previously cast doubt on her return when the film was confirmed in 2022.

“I think we know that it’s probably not going to be possible,” Julie told Access Hollywood at the time. “It was talked about very shortly after [the second sequel] came out, but it’s now how many years since then? And I am that much older, and Annie the princess, or queen, is so much older. And I am not sure where it would float or run.”

Advertisement
Julie Andrews will not be returning for the third Princess Diaries movie
Julie Andrews will not be returning for the third Princess Diaries movie

Ron Batzdorff/Brownhouse Prod/Botnp Inc/Kobal/Shutterstock

Anne Hathaway recently revealed the third instalment was being temporarily put on pause due to her third pregnancy.

“I’m busy making baby No. 3 and that has sort of taken the place of knowing exactly when I can make Princess Diaries 3,” Anne admitted during an appearance on SiriusXM’s Radio Andy last month.

“But I can say I think we had a story breakthrough. I think we are moving in the right direction. The script that we were working on — we kind of had to start over with this new direction, which is not the update I think anybody wants, but we all feel really good that this is gonna be the one,” the Devil Wears Prada actor added.

The Princess Diaries was originally released in 2001 with Anne playing Mia Thermopolis, a teenager from San Francisco who discovers that she is the heir apparent to the throne of the fictional Genovia.

Advertisement

Julie played her grandmother, who taught the clumsy, awkward teen how to be elegant royalty.

The 2004 sequel also reunited Anne and Julie as granddaughter and grandmother, as the former navigated life in Genovia, and tried to find a suitor.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The far left hits a wall

Published

on

The far left hits a wall

After hot DSA summer comes the fall.

Democratic socialist Francesca Hong’s stunning loss in Wisconsin’s Democratic gubernatorial primary Tuesday night revealed limits to the far left’s power — and is undercutting the narrative of an emerging insurgency.

While progressive Peggy Flanagan cruised by 20 points in Minnesota’s Senate primary, and last week the further left Abdul El-Sayed squeaked through his Senate race in Michigan, Hong, the furthest left of the three, received no major national support and fell short.

For a movement that had been riding high off a string of primary victories this cycle, including the Democratic Socialists of America’s recent wins in New York and Colorado, the deflating Wisconsin result led to an immediate round of finger-pointing on the far left. Some dyed-in-the-wool democratic socialists blamed fellow travelers who didn’t join the effort to boost Hong. More institutional-leaning progressives argued that she was a fatally flawed candidate with a long string of gaffes — and that her loss shouldn’t be read as a referendum on the broader movement.

Advertisement

“She got clobbered by the national media, didn’t respond as deftly as Abdul and didn’t have time to build a counter-narrative,” said Cenk Uygur, the Young Turks founder and Justice Democrats co-founder. “The negative publicity of the last two weeks seems to have taken its toll.”

Some mainline progressives sought to distinguish far-left democratic socialism from a broader movement, citing examples such as Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis), a progressive who has won statewide by focusing on kitchen table issues, health care and the state’s agricultural economy — all while refraining from the so-called woke battles.

“I wouldn’t equate progressive and DSA,” said one Wisconsin Democratic operative, granted anonymity to speak candidly. The person added of a democratic socialist’s outlook in Wisconsin ahead of 2028: “I do think there is a ceiling at this point.”

Baldwin, notably, did not endorse in the primary — nor did other top Wisconsin progressives including Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), a former co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus.

Advertisement

The movement’s leading national voices, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also kept Hong at arm’s length and withheld their endorsements. Some who viewed Hong as a long shot in the general election and want the movement to avoid missteps like they saw with Graham Platner in Maine say the results proved those concerns were well founded.

“Bernie, AOC, and most national groups stayed out,” said a progressive Democratic strategist, granted anonymity to speak candidly. “Abdul El-Sayed was a great foot forward, Graham Platner was not, and we didn’t need our political reputation hanging on this race.”

“There’s a reason the institutional left mostly stayed away,” said a Democratic operative who works on progressive campaigns, granted anonymity to speak candidly. “The people who made those calls are relieved.”

Hong’s surprise flop drew attention on the left away from their biggest win of the night, where the Sanders-backed Flanagan — a solid progressive but not a democratic socialist — easily defeated moderate Rep. Angie Craig in the Minnesota Senate primary. A progressive won a primary in the seat to replace Craig, while the Sanders-backed Rebecca Cooke won a primary for Wisconsin’s swingy third district.

Advertisement

One donor adviser who works with progressive candidates around the country said Hong’s loss is a “good thing for the movement,” because it shows there is voter appetite for progressive ideas — but that candidate quality still matters, especially in a battleground.

“This is a far better outcome, and says that it is so close that a progressive who doesn’t say the dumbest shit in the world, [like] Thanksgiving should not exist, would have won,” the donor adviser said.

But others blame Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez for sitting out the race, arguing their involvement could’ve gotten Hong comfortably over the finish line.

Other DSA rising stars including Melat Kiros and Chris Rabb, who had spent other recent primary days campaigning in states like Michigan and Colorado, also skipped Wisconsin.

Advertisement

“This movement will fail if we see more letdowns at the critical moment, like we saw in this race,” said popular socialist voice Nathan J. Robinson, editor-in-chief of the leftist magazine Current Affairs. “Especially if AOC wants to be taken seriously as a national leader of the left movement, she needs to actually support the candidates out there who have a chance to notch victories.”

Sanders’ and Ocasio-Cortez’s teams did not respond to requests for comment.

Some in the movement looked to downplay Hong’s showing as more of a stumble than a turning point, noting that a first-time statewide candidate came within a few thousand votes of sitting Gov. Tony Evers’ hand-picked favorite in a battleground state.

They also noted Hong had her margins cut down in key strongholds by a fellow progressive who didn’t heed calls to drop out of the race. State Sen. Kelda Roys pulled over 7 percent of the vote.

Advertisement

Organizers watched a national volunteer army flood neighboring Michigan just a week earlier to help El-Sayed grind out a surprisingly close race. To them, the contrast with Wisconsin — where Hong was largely left to fend for herself down the stretch — was hard to ignore.

“Wisconsin being this close is very frustrating because folks like AOC and Bernie Sanders stayed out. If they just did one rally in Wisconsin for Hong, that would have probably wrapped it up for her,” said Deep Singh Badhesha, a DSA political operative who campaigned in past primary states.

Our Revolution, the progressive group founded out of Sanders’ 2016 campaign that is no longer associated with him, offered a veiled jab at the progressives that didn’t publicly support Hong — including, seemingly, their original founder who sat out the race.

“We cannot build progressive power while gatekeeping our own movement through the eyes of the establishment,” the group said on X. “Solidarity cannot be something we practice only after someone has proven they can win without us.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rod Stewart Cancels Tour On Medical Grounds After Coronary Stent

Published

on

Rod Stewart Cancels Tour On Medical Grounds After Coronary Stent

Sir Rod Stewart has announced he’s been forced to cancel the remainder of his current US tour on medical grounds.

In the past week, the 81-year-old crooner postponed one show and cancelled another after what was described by one of the venues as “an unforeseen but minor medical procedure that required prompt attention”.

However, on Tuesday night, his team issued a statement confirming the rest of the tour would not be able to go ahead as he needs time to recuperate following a “routine coronary stent procedure”.

“Following further medical evaluation, Sir Rod Stewart has successfully undergone a routine coronary stent procedure,” they said. “Doctors are pleased with his recovery, and Rod is doing very well and has returned to his normal daily activities.

Advertisement

“On the advice of his doctors, he will take the next four weeks to recuperate and regain full fitness before returning to the stage. Unfortunately, this means he will be unable to continue his current tour dates.”

In his own statement, Sir Rod noted: “I’m already feeling better and very much on the mend. I want to thank the doctors, nurses and everyone who has taken such wonderful care of me.”

He added: “I’m deeply disappointed to miss these shows and sorry to let my fans down, but I look forward to getting back on stage and having a good time with you all again soon.”

Sir Rod is currently in the middle of his One Last Time tour, which had so far taken him across Europe and the US.

Advertisement

Back in 2024, he maintained that he has “no desire to retire”, but told fans that these shows would probably mark the end of him performing “large-scale world tours”.

The Maggie May singer claimed on social media: “I love what I do, and I do what I love. I’m fit, have a full head of hair, and can run 100 metres in 18 seconds at the jolly old age of 79.

“I’d like to move onto a Great American Songbook, Swing Fever tour the year after next – smaller venues and more intimacy…”

“But then again, I may not,” he added cryptically, signing off his message: “The ambiguous Sir Rod Stewart.”

Advertisement

Sir Rod also teased to TalkSport earlier this year that he intended to take part in a UK tour in 2027, including a date at London’s iconic O2 Arena, “and that’ll probably be it, I think”.

Meanwhile, in June, the Grammy winner was forced to briefly pause a live performance in West Valley City, Utah, so he could be administered with an oxygen mask.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Office Star Lucy Davis Shares Incurable Cancer Diagnosis

Published

on

Lucy Davis in character as Dawn in The Office

The Office actor Lucy Davis has disclosed that she has been diagnosed with an “incurable” form of breast cancer.

On Tuesday evening, Lucy shared a post with her Instagram followers, which read: “I wanted to share something with you all that I’ve kept to myself for a while but for various reasons would like to share now.

“A year and a half ago I was diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer, which has metastasised to my bones. Specifically to my spine, right hip, and my ribs. The cancer is incurable, and too late for chemo.

“The initial lump that I felt, wasn’t a ‘lump’ as such; rather a kind of hard spot. Really tiny. I almost didn’t bother getting it checked. So I guess I’m saying don’t ignore anything – get everything checked out.”

Advertisement

She continued: “As of now, I’m trying to live out whatever might be left of my life in as fun a way as I possibly can. I always like to find the teachable moments in anything negative that happens. And cancer has not disappointed in that regard; there’s a lot I have learned from it, and I’m grateful for that.

“As some of you will know, the pain can really be something else. Standing and walking for too long a time can be hard, and I need to use a wheelchair sometimes (so if you see me toddling around in one, feel free to give me a push!).

“The thing that has been most vital to me is humour. I asked my friends and family to make fun of me as much as possible (which they’re really good at…), and most importantly of all to not treat me like a sick person. There’s nothing that will make you feel more unwell than being treated as if you’re unwell.”

Lucy Davis in character as Dawn in The Office
Lucy Davis in character as Dawn in The Office

“I’m not scared of whatever comes next,” the 53-year-old then insisted. “I’m at peace with it. I’ll see my Gracie [her late dog, who died in 2024] sooner than expected, and for me, leaving my physical body just means going home. Any and all grieving is for my family; it’s far harder for them than for me.”

She also added that she wanted to “keep up all my work for animal rights” and “keep working” as much as possible, as she’s “perfectly able to do so, and acting is one of the biggest joys in my life”.

Advertisement

“For those of you on a similar journey to mine, I do wish you well,” she concluded. “Cancer asks a lot from us, physically and mentally. And we all get to do it however we choose.”

After starting her acting career in the early 1990s, Lucy’s breakthrough moment came in 2001 when she began playing Dawn in Ricky Gervais’ hit mockumentary sitcom The Office.

Since then, her TV work has included parts in Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip and Netflix’s Chilling Adventures Of Sabrina, in addition to film roles in projects like Shaun Of The Dead and 2017’s Wonder Woman reboot.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Police Chiefs Pressure Burnham To Block Early Release

Published

on

Andy Burnham Urges Minister To Keep Police Killer In Jail

Policing chiefs from across the UK have piled pressure on Andy Burnham to use “every lawful option” to stop the early release of PC Andrew Harper’s killers.

A letter from 50 senior officers and other law enforcement leaders called on the prime minister to “establish an additional public protection safeguard” for the most serious offenders, when future early release schemes are floated.

Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, Greater Manchester chief constable Stephen Watson and National Crime Agency director general Graeme Biggar are among those who have signed the letter.

They said families and victims “must be properly considered whenever significant changes are made to sentencing or release arrangements”.

Advertisement

Their intervention came after Burnham ordered justice secretary Alex Norris to find a way to keep Jessie Cole and Albert Bower behind bars.

They were sentenced to 13 years for the manslaughter of PC Harper in 2020, but are due to be freed in January under controversial measures to stop prisons running out of spaces.

PC Harper was fatally injured when he got caught in a strap attached to the back of a car and was dragged down a country road as the killers fled the scene of a quad bike theft in Sulhamstead, Berkshire, in 2019.

Burnham announced he was pausing the early release scheme two weeks ago following public anger.

Advertisement

It was then announced that those convicted of rape, serious child sex offences and grooming offences would not be included in the scheme – but that meant that Cole and Bower would still be released.

The letter to Burnham says: “When the state asks people to run towards danger on behalf of the public, they should be able to trust that the justice system will stand behind them when the worst happens.

“PC Andrew Harper’s case also raises a wider question.

“When someone is sentenced for an exceptionally serious offence, how much confidence can victims, bereaved families and the public place in that sentence if subsequent changes to release arrangements result in an offender being released significantly earlier than originally anticipated?”

Advertisement

The letter went on: “Officers and staff understand that the law must be applied as it stands. But they will question what message this sends about the value placed on their service and sacrifice when they put themselves in harm’s way to protect others.

“Police officers and staff see first-hand the impact serious crime has on victims and their families. They support people through some of the most difficult moments of their lives and ask them to place their trust in the justice system.

“That trust is vital and should not be weakened. We are also collectively concerned that an approach to early release which does not sufficiently distinguish the most serious offending risks undermining public safety, victim confidence and wider confidence in the criminal justice system.”

Speaking on Tuesday, the PM said he is “increasingly confident” PC Harper’s killers will not be released early.

Advertisement

He said Norris had been asked to fast-track proposals to create “more headroom” in the prison system, including through deporting more foreign offenders, finding a solution for people on indeterminate sentences and using cells previously holding female inmates to accommodate male offenders.

Burnham previously said he had “pushed the very limits” in the changes he had made to the early release scheme, but has now said he can go further.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

My Memories of Ann Widdecombe

Published

on

Today I will be attending Ann Widdecombe’s funeral in south Devon.

My last event in Edinburgh finished at 9.30pm last night so the only way to get to Totnes in time was to be driven, given I don’t get my driving licence back until the weekend. My best friend Dan Bryce drove up from Kent yesterday and has driven me through the night so I can be there. He’s an absolute hero. And then there’s the matter of another four hours or so back to Kent afterwards.

In the days after Ann died, I did countless TV interviews trying to explain who she really was, and countering some of the lies and insults that were being thrown her way by people who should know better. The wife of a friend of mine was watching one of these interviews and apparently remarked: “There’s a man who hasn’t had time to grieve.” She was right. I hadn’t computed the awfulness of what had happened and had to go into commentor mode, otherwise I’d have been too emotional. I don’t normally cry at funerals, but I am fully expecting to be in floods of tears at this one, staring at the coffin which will contain poor Ann’s battered body. I think that’s when it will really hit me.

I first met Ann 29 years ago, when I opened Politico’s Bookshop. On her first visit she we had made some badges saying ‘Doris Karloff for Tory Leader’. She found this hilarious and bought several dozen of them.

Advertisement

One day she came in and she almost collapsed in a heap when we gave her a pair of lacy, black, knickers, emblazoned with “Something of the Night”, the slogan she had invented to derail Michael Howard’s leadership campaign. “But they they’re too small. They won’t fit,” she cried. A vision was forming in my mind… She was just leaving the shop when I noticed she had left the knickers on the counter. So I yelled after her “Ann, you’ve forgotten your knickers!” And there can’t be many men that have said that to Ann Widdecombe.

Ann’s first novel, The Clematis Tree, was a huge success, but I do sometimes wonder why. She certainly had a unique way of selling it. 

At the Tory Party Conference in 2000, I was rather alarmed at her marketing technique. Like a market trader she would brandish the book and shout out: “No sex, no violence, no swearing! Get your clean novels here!”  Ann, I thought, “you’re at a Tory Party Conference!”, which let’s face it usually has its fair share of all three. But she proved me wrong – and we sold all 400 copies. The next year, she was back and was reprising her market trader act. As she was screeching and signing, a delivery of Edwina Currie’s explosive new diaries arrived. All 200 of them. Edwina had captured the headlines with the revelation that she and John Major had had an affair. I quietly displayed a dozen of the Currie diaries next to Ann and waited for her to notice. She did not have a high opinion of Edwina. Sure enough, she clocked them and changed her sales patter and pointed to Edwina’s tomes, shouting, “Very dirty diaries, get your clean novels here!”, pointing to her new book ‘An Act of Treachery’. I used to take her to task for this as I had found a passage on page 158 where it was quite clear that she main character had had sex with her Nazi lover. Ann denied this and described it as ‘wooing’. ‘Not in my house, it isn’t’, I’d reply.

Ann and I did a theatre tour of around 50 provincial theatres with our show ‘A Night with Ann Widdecombe’. I’d interview her for the first half and then I’d host a Q&A. We didn’t have a script as such, but I knew the prompts to give so she could regale with audience with various stories and anecdotes.

Advertisement

 The theatre shows produced some hilarious moments, including one in Chelmsford when a militantly gay member of the audience got up and walked out shouting at us to eff off because we were bigots. It was that same evening when two of my favourite moments occurred.

 ID: So when ITV ask you to do these programmes, how do you judge whether to do them?

AW: Well, when they asked me to do prostitution, I readily agreed… [cue audience collapsing with laughter]


The theatre was sold out, with more than 500 people packed in. The repartee worked a treat, to the extent that one man said to me afterwards: “You are so easy together. Are you an item?” Miss W was a bit too quick to reply: “We most certainly are not!” He didn’t look convinced…

Advertisement

The only time I saw her stumped was when a member of the audience asked: “Miss Widdecombe, can you please explain why any member of the female sex would ever want to have an affair with John Prescott?” She gulped like a goldfish.

I’d usually drive her to the venues and we’d chew over the issues of the day on the journey. On the rare occasions she was awake we gossiped and sometimes bared our souls to each other. 

On Celebrity Big Brother Ann admitted she snored, and wondered how other housemates would react to it. Seeing as Ann mentioned it herself, I think I can reveal I have personal experience of Ann’s snoring. [Stop it at the back!]. When we’d drive to theatres all around the country she’d inevitably fall asleep in the passenger seat. Gradually her head would loll, back, her mouth would open and out would come some startling snoring noises. I could turn the music up as loud as I liked, but it had no effect. Even a dose of Meat Loaf had no effect. The eruptions would continue. The only think that quelled them was a quick poke to her side. It did make me laugh, though! When she eventually woke up, she’d always say: “I hope I didn’t snore”… “Absolutely not,” I replied…

 I remember once driving to Malvern on the night of the Commons vote to allow gay people to adopt children. Conservative MPs had been whipped by Iain Duncan Smith to vote against.

Advertisement

I was fulminating about what a ridiculous decision that had been, and that it should have been a free vote. If memory serves me correctly, she agreed, although you can imagine that’s where the agreement ended.

At one point I remember saying: “I don’t know why I am talking about this seeing as I have never, ever wanted children.” Ann was very shocked by this and said I couldn’t be serious. Just as she didn’t believe I never wanted children, I never quite believed her protestations that she was quite happy being single and childless. She addressed this issue in her autobiography, STRICTLY ANN, and it is clear, to me at any rate, that family was, and had been, the most important thing in her life. The way she looked after her mother after her father died in 2007, was a lesson to many. Ann joked that she relishes the single lifestyle. When she got home, she could kick off her shoes, pour herself a whisky and watch whatever she liked on TV without caring a jot about demands likely to made on her by a husband, but even so, I still reckoned the lady did protest too much. I can think of few things which would have given her friends more happiness than if she had met someone at that stage in her life and fell head over heels. It would have been a brave man who took her on, but one thing I have learnt is that there is someone out there for everyone. They just have to find each other. I can imagine her reading and spluttering ‘yuck’ or ‘stuff and nonsense’.

Anyway, on that journey I told her why I thought it was right to allow gay people to adopt. I said that surely it was better for a child to be in a safe home with loving parents, whatever their sex, than stay in a children’s home for the rest of their childhood. She maintained that stability for a child was very important, and then came out with this corker. “It’s a well-known fact that gay relationships only last an average of two years!” I shot back: “That’s rubbish. In my experience it’s more like 20 minutes.” I could see the cogs whirring in her brain and when she finally computed what I was implying she had the good grace to roar with laughter.

Ann rarely enjoyed my driving. She’s a very good backseat driver, if you get my drift. I remember one time, we had been to Porthcawl in South Wales and we’d had nothing to eat all day. After the show we stopped to get some petrol and stocked up on a bit of junk food – right in the middle of her diet.

Advertisement

I got onto the M4 and started opening the sandwich and packet of crisps and can of lilt. Ann nearly had a fit – OK I was driving with my knees but it was perfectly safe! “Do you not think you ought to have at least one hand on the steering wheel!” she screamed. So I got my own back. I made her listen to the Pet Shop Boys and Erasure for the rest of the three hour journey back.  She never forgave me.

I asked her one day if people reacted differently to her now that she had dyed her hair blond. She said “people speak to me now, much m o r e s l o w w w w l l l y y y”.

When STRICTLY ANN was published, Christopher Howse wrote a disgusting review of it for the Telegraph in which he reckoned the whole book was about a failed life. He had a very warped view of what constitutes success. That’s the trouble with Widdecombe book reviews. They tended to be dominated by the critic’s pre-existing opinion of Ann, rather than concentrate on the book’s literary merits. Her novel AN ACT OF TREACHERY, a story of love in second world war Paris, was a brilliant tale, expertly researched and told. But most reviews concentrated on the absence of sex in it.

The thing is, Ann could write. And she could tell a story. This was not a book about a failed life. It was a book about a woman of definite opinions, who made her way in the world with little help from anyone and became one of the best- known women in the country. She neared the peak of the political mountain, stuck to her guns, was seen as the most honest politician in the country and respected even by her foes. She made some excellent (but also, it has to be said, one or two truly terrible) TV programmes, was a best-selling author and one of the best orators of her generation. You know, most people would settle for that as a record of accomplishment. Clearly not Christopher Howse, but you can’t win ‘em all.

Advertisement

Her memoir was a very detailed book, sometimes a little too detailed for the average reader, and in setting out to write her memoirs, Ann must have wondered which audience she was writing for – a political audience or her celebrity fans. If anything she went for the former, but she sometimes had to explain things to her second audience which would sometimes leave the political audience feeling a little irritated. I remember discussing the possibility of her writing her memoirs with her in one of our theatre evenings and she seemed adamant she wouldn’t do it. “I don’t want a friendless old age,” was her get out clause. “Well, I said, you should do it if only to put it on the record for posterity, or do you want Michael Howard to do that for you?” A clinching argument!

It is often said that autobiography is a work of fiction about yourself. Not this one. Yes, it was at times a little self-serving, but I have never read an autobiography that isn’t. Including my own! When reading back her speech proposing herself for the Speakership she wrote:

“Re-Reading that speech again for the purposes of this book, I could not fault it.”

Maybe not, but if I had been her editor, that sentence wouldn’t have made the final cut. But that is to carp. All the political episodes she wrote about that I had first-hand knowledge of were described with total honesty and candour. She wasn’t afraid to admit her own failings or misjudgements, and she was also not afraid to dole out criticism to fellow MPs where they merited it – and even sometimes when they possibly didn’t. This was not a bitchy book, but it was not without its knifings. Michael Howard copped much of Ann’s ire, although she is not afraid to praise him at times too. But perhaps my favourite comment in the whole book is when she says she would happily fight in the trenches alongside Michael Howard…

Advertisement

“…knowing that he would never be cowardly in the face of the enemy or desert his fellow soldiers. The difficulty is that if the battle went wrong, he would immediately be looking for someone to court martial and shoot. Or perhaps just shoot.”

Straight between the shoulder blades!

 

In 2003, Ann sponsored my Conservative candidate application and also endorsed me on my North Norfolk application form, knowing full well I was gay. It mattered not a jot to her.

Advertisement

The first question I was asked in the North Norfolk candidate selection was on fox hunting. I didn’t exactly lie, but I didn’t tell the whole truth either. It ran something like this: “You are a close friend of Ann Widdecombe, do you share her views on fox hunting.” I replied to the effect of: “Just because I am friends with someone doesn’t mean I necessarily share their view on anything, and there are rather a lot of things Miss Widdecombe and I disagree about.” A classic politician’s answer. It was totally true but on the other hand didn’t tell the whole truth. I felt slightly grubby, but needs must and all that. Anyway, my non-answer didn’t hold me back and I topped the first round vote against 19 candidates.

In eighteen months I managed to restrict my attendance of the local hunt to a single occasion.

In May 2004, Ann Widdecombe came to north Norfolk, although she somehow came via the A1, having taken a wrong turning off the M25. I decided to take her to the Catholic shrine at Walsingham. I mean what else would you do with Ann Widdecombe? We then went back to the cottage for an hour before she was due at a fundraiser in North Walsham with local party members. John, being polite, asked her if there was anything he could get her. Ann rather astonished him by saying how she wouldn’t mind a plate of egg and chips prior to leaving for the dinner. I thought she was joking, but she wasn’t! Bear in mind this was about 6.45pm and the dinner started at 7.30! Bear in mind also that she had just appeared on Celebrity Fit Club, or as I called it, Fat Club. Being a true gentleman, I wouldn’t have mentioned it but Ann proceeded to tell every person she met about it. The dinner went well, and was a sellout. The only slightly awkward moment was when a woman asked Ann what she thought of gays. I think I ended up answering it for her.

I also remember incurring her wrath around this time. We’d been to one of our theatre evenings and I stayed at her south London flat as I had to appear on LBC the next morning with Sandi Toksvig. I recall telling Sandi about Ann’s very floral curtains and the colour of the duvet I had slept under. As I was speaking I thought maybe I should have kept these details to myself. When she found out, she was understandably furious and let me know it. 

Advertisement

In 2006, having lost disastrously in North Norfolk I applied for Ann Widdecombe’s seat of Maidstone, only a few miles from where I live in Tunbridge Wells. I was surprised when Ann told me she was standing down as she was a mere 62 at the time. She had already embarked on a media career and I told her I was worried that it would come to a grinding halt if she didn’t have the letters M and P after her name. I was wrong. What I also didn’t foresee was her political metamophormosis from ardent Ken Clarke supporter to diehard Nigel Farage supporter and Brexit Party MEP. Stranger and stranger, said Alice.

Although I was hopeful in Maidstone I feared that my friendship with Ann might count against me, as they would fear her being a backseat driver. There was little I could do about that. I was on the round one shortlist and despite doing my best ever selection speech and despite answering questions well, I wasn’t put through to the next round. However, Ann’s good friend Conor Burns did come second to the eventual winner, Helen Grant, so maybe that blows my theory out of the water.

A couple of years later, Ann told me she was buying a house on Dartmoor. I told her she was mad. It was literally in the middle of nowhere. I thought she would hate it, but she told me she wanted a peaceful retirement writing books with cats and dogs as company. She was perfectly happy in her own company and wanted a quiet life. It didn’t really turn out like that and the political bug still bit, as proved by her return to politics with the Brexit Party in 2019, when she stood for and won a seat in the European Parliament.

It was also in 2008 that John and I had our Civil Partnership. I wasn’t sure whether to invite Ann, given I knew her strong belief that marriage was between a man and a woman. I went ahead anyway, as she was a friend. Sure enough she declined on the basis that was going to be in Spain that weekend. Fair enough. However, her then secretary mistakenly copied me in on a reply to Ann in which she had told said secretary to let me down gently, as she didn’t want to upset me, but she couldn’t be seen at such an event. I was amused, if anything, and certainly not offended. When I told her a few years later I had seen the email, she was absolutely mortified.

Advertisement

Ann loved the cut and thrust of the political interview and I interviewed her many times over the years and we had some memorable exchanges. After one of the more robust interviews she phoned me and said why had I been so aggressive with her, I was supposed to be her friend. “I was only doing my job,” I replied. “Don’t take it personally!”. “I know,” she said.

Ann always said her favourite interviews were on Jonathan Dimbleby’s Sunday lunchtime show, in which he would interview her for an hour in front of a live audience.

I wonder what she would have made of a dream I once had in which I dreamt that Bill Cash had introduced a bill into the House of Commons to make Ann Widdecombe a princess. Make of that what you will.

I have completed this collection of memories at midnight on the night before Ann’s funeral at Buckfast Abbey in Devon. I started it on the day after she died. But I just couldn’t finish it. This seems the right time to publish it.

Advertisement

I do hope Ann’s views on heaven and the afterlife have turned out to be true. I hope I meet her there one day.

 

 

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Zia Yusuf Ignores Nigel Farages Criticism On X

Published

on

Zia Yusuf Ignores Nigel Farages Criticism On X

Zia Yusuf has snubbed Nigel Farage by refusing to delete a post on X calling former Tory defence secretary Ben Wallace “a traitor to Britain”.

The Reform UK leader slapped down his home affairs spokesman for the comment, which sparked an angry backlash, and said he would give him “a ticking off”.

But more than 12 hours later, Yusuf’s offending tweet – as well as a poll he posted asking whether Wallace should be “prosecuted for treason”.

As well as being a former cabinet minister, Wallace also served in the Scots Guards in Northern Ireland during the Troubles.

Advertisement

However, Yusuf said he had betrayed his country by allowing thousands of Afghans who had served the UK during the war in their country into the UK.

That was in response to Wallace criticising Reform’s plan to send foreign criminals in British jails to serve out their sentences in El Salvador.

“Incredible that this moron was defence secretary,” Yusuf said in his post on Monday.

“Our policy today is in direct response to your government’s failures.

Advertisement

“If their home countries won’t take back, their citizens that are languishing in our jails, we are renting spaces in countries like El Salvador to put them.

“They will serve their full jail terms there, and will be banned from ever coming back to Britain.

“You know, the ones you took a super injunction out to keep secret from the British people? That’s why I call you a traitor to Britain. You fit the dictionary definition.”

Asked about the row on Tuesday, Farage told The Sun: “That is too strong a language. I shall give him a ticking off, don’t worry.

Advertisement

“I’ll speak to him today, but it’s over the top.”

It is not known what Farage actually said to Yusuf, or whether he told him to take down his tweets.

Tim Montgomerie – a leading political commentator who quit the Tories to join Reform – also said Yusuf’s language “isn’t acceptable”.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Burnham To Lead Emergency Meeting As UK Temperatures Rise

Published

on

Burnham To Lead Emergency Meeting As UK Temperatures Rise

Andy Burnham will chair a meeting of the government’s emergency Cobra committee as the UK braces itself for another day of soaring temperatures which have led to widespread wildfires and plunged much of the country into drought.

The prime minister will meet with ministers, officials and agencies on Wednesday afternoon, with temperatures of 33 degrees celsius forecast in parts of England in the fifth heatwave of the summer.

It comes as a firefighter union chief warned the country faces a “national emergency” amid ongoing wildfires.

A No.10 spokesperson said: “The prime minister will chair a meeting of COBR – the government emergency committee – this afternoon on the UK’s ongoing response to extreme heat, wildfires and drought.

Advertisement

“We know how challenging this summer is proving, particularly for firefighters tackling wildfires, farmers working in drought conditions, and NHS staff in busy A&E units.

“We will continue to take the action needed to keep communities safe, protect water supplies and safeguard the environment.”

The Met Office said the UK is on course for its hottest summer on record, as parts of the country face their fifth heatwave this summer.

Rare amber “extreme heat” warnings have been issued by the forecaster for London and parts of the South East, East Midlands, East of England, West Midlands and South Yorkshire from 9am to midnight on Thursday.

Advertisement

The government urged the public to pay attention to UK Health Security Agency heat health alerts, and advised people should drink plenty of fluids and check in on family, friends and neighbours who may be at high risk.

Firefighters have responded to 966 wildfires across England and Wales this year, including 185 in the first 10 days of August alone, while July was the busiest month on record for wildfires with 458 incidents.

Steve Wright, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, said: “In many parts of the country, firefighters do not have the new modern equipment to deal with these.

“They do not have the new modern personal protective equipment, the lightweight fire kit that we wear, the right helmets, lightweight helmets, breathable uniforms to make sure they’re better protected, their health is protected when they’re out dealing with these incidents for hours and hours on end.”

Advertisement

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025