Politics
Tom Skinner says he got paid 2k, BBC says no we didn’t
Tom Skinner is famous for three things:
- Not being political.
- Being a member of Reform UK (a political party).
- “Bosh”.
Thomas Skinner used to post long ChatGPT paragraphs about how he’s not political, and he’s just a normal guy grafting. pic.twitter.com/WjcwjD3ZUn
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) January 20, 2026
In his efforts to explain how un-political he is, Skinner appeared on the politics show Question Time on 26 March. When asked why he did it, Skinner told everyone he was paid £2,000. Now, the BBC has thrown this claim into question:
Question Time can confirm that panellists who are not politicians are offered an appearance fee of £150.
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) March 27, 2026
Bosh!
As Mukhtar highlighted, this is what Skinner brought to the table on Question Time:
This is the same guy who called Zack Polanski a bell end because he didn’t agree with his politics. pic.twitter.com/lRXvDy0efs
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) March 27, 2026
In the above clip, Skinner says:
what I don’t like about social media is it’s always about dividing people. It’s always about people screaming and shouting – ‘if you don’t agree with me, if you don’t agree with what I stand for, or if you don’t agree with my politics, I hate you, this, that, the other. You’re a gammon or you’re a snowflake’.
Why are we not… I try and spread a bit of positivity and a bit of love, do you know what I mean?
‘People should be nicer to each other‘ – wow – with pearls of wisdom like this, you can see why they’d pay him thirteen times the going rate.
Politics has to be about more than professional politicians. But Tom Skinner is hardly adding anything to the sum total of human wisdom with his ‘I am a bit of a geezer’ which he has monetised to punt his right-wing pro-Farage views. #bbcqt https://t.co/okG6dWvxUV
— Gerry Hassan (@GerryHassan) March 26, 2026
Because Skinner is linked to Reform UK (and also to US vice president JD Vance), people have argued the BBC should have made his political affiliations known:
Right-wing influencer and Reform UK member Tom Skinner was on Question Time last night – but the BBC just ignored his political links 👀 https://t.co/GFsjMi8uKI
— The National (@ScotNational) March 27, 2026
Let’s be right, Tom Skinner isn’t on #bbcqt tonight due to his political insight but instead because he’s a vocal supporter of Reform
If Reform have put him forward over any one of their 8 actual MPs, it’s a shocking indictment of the sheer lack of talent within their party pic.twitter.com/AVWoYcAARb
— David (@Zero_4) March 26, 2026
Skinner claimed he wasn’t there to represent a political party; he was simply there to make a tidy £2k:
Isn’t it suspicious that a guy who kept saying “I ain’t political, I really ain’t” then meets JD Vance, suddenly claims he’s joined Reform, urges people to back Nigel Farage as the next PM, and is now being paid £2k by the BBC?
I’m actually not hating on him for taking the 2k. pic.twitter.com/TmV8taAIp3
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) March 27, 2026
Tom Skinner — Grand
At this point, it’s clear that someone is lying, and we’re inclined to believe it could be either party.
For some in depth analysis of Question Time, be sure to follow us on social media (links at the top of the page):
The Canary has been analysing #bbcqt every week this year to look for evidence of systemic bias. Here’s what we found in last week’s episode… #QuestionTime pic.twitter.com/JHZayR5eva
— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) March 26, 2026
Featured image via BBC
Politics
The House | Our rural communities are being hollowed out by the existential threat of depopulation

Gairloch looking toward Strath Bay, North-West Highlands of Scotland (Alamy)
4 min read
Britain, like every developed country, has a problem: an ageing population and declining birth rate.
My constituency of Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire, is an extreme example of what is happening across our island.
In the Highlands and Islands, youth emigration and rural depopulation are nothing less than an existential threat. Every year there’s worse news about plummeting school rolls, struggling local services, and communities growing older and older. Between 2001 and 2024, the Highlands saw the population aged 75 and over increase by 78 per cent, placing a massive burden on struggling social care provision.
Meanwhile, schools like Mallaig High School have seen pupil numbers fall from 147 pupils in 2005 to just 100 today, a 32 per cent drop, and in Gairloch there’s been a 47 per cent decrease. Availability of Stem teachers is limited, and these subjects are what the better-paying employers want. The families are leaving, looking for higher-paid work and available housing, and our young people are unable to see a future locally.
I believe that rural communities are considered as an afterthought, not helped by the fact that decision makers – in my case, Highland Council, the Scottish government and the UK government – are concentrated in Inverness, Edinburgh and London, far removed from rural realities. Funding pots are focused on population centres. I recently spoke to communities who felt abandoned because decision makers at CalMac had decided from behind a desk 150 miles south that their ferry services weren’t important enough to be classed as “lifeline”.
The cost of living only deepens the challenge. In remote Scotland, a Scottish affairs committee inquiry found the cost of living was estimated to be up to 30 per cent higher than in urban areas. Fuel poverty affects around 33 per cent of households, one of the highest rates anywhere in the UK. Housing shortages make it even harder for young people and families to stay or settle. As a result of the lack of working-age people, employers across the Highlands cannot recruit for essential roles in care, hospitality and other sectors that underpin the west coast economy.
Immigration policy is also part of the problem. Controls set at Westminster fail to reflect the acute labour shortages facing rural communities. Areas that need workers, whether in social care, tourism or local services, are too often unable to get the people required to sustain them.
There are also the missed opportunities. The Highlands sits at the heart of the UK’s renewable energy potential, yet communities see little benefit in terms of local jobs or long-term economic gain. The SNP cut college provision and apprenticeship pathways by £100m, adding to the shortfall of education and training pathways that have would allowed local young people to enter these industries and stop the rural brain-drain.
This trajectory doesn’t have to be inevitable. The Faroe Islands, which I visited with the Scottish Affairs Committee recently, offers a powerful counter example. With a population of around 55,000, they have maintained a stable population by investing in connectivity and education, paying higher average wages, and ensuring that people have a reason to stay.
That contrast should prompt serious reflection. In the Highlands, the opposite is too often true. A lack of housing, shortage of NHS staff, unreliable ferry services, and inadequate infrastructure are all making it harder to live and work in these communities.
Demographic change on this scale cannot be ignored. Without action, we risk hollowing out communities that have existed for generations. But with the right policies – targeted investment in skills, better infrastructure, action on housing, and embracing a migrant policy where there are labour shortages – we can turn the tide before it’s too late.
Angus MacDonald is Liberal Democrat MP for Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire
Politics
The House | As the first MP to be deepfaked, I say we must do more to protect our democracy from AI harm

3 min read
Imagine discovering that your face, your voice, or your image has been used online by a third party, without your consent, to seriously misrepresent you. Not a misunderstanding.
Not a parody. A fabricated version of you – saying things you never said, doing things you never did, appearing in content you never agreed to.
AI deepfake technology means this is no longer the realm of science fiction – it is already happening. As the first MP to be the target of a deepfake political disinformation attack, I’ve seen first-hand the disruption it can cause our democracy.
In 2022, as minister for AI and the Intellectual Property Office, I rejected tech sector lobbying for broad text and data mining freedoms after hearing from the APPG for the Creative Industries. Without safeguards, such changes would have undermined the rights of musicians, writers and artists in a sector worth £146bn a year. If the UK is to lead in both AI and the creative industries, the burden must be on AI to show it can coexist – an unchecked ‘free-for-all’ serves neither.
I therefore welcome the government’s recent proposal to revisit digital copyright law, and its recognition that policy “must support prosperity for all UK citizens”. But this is not only about prosperity. It is also about ensuring AI is not used to undermine our democracy, security, society or fundamental rights.
Having spent 30 years in technology and innovation, and as the founder of one of the UK’s earliest AI drug discovery companies in 2001, I fully recognise the transformative potential to deliver enormous economic and public service benefits.
The UK already has the third-largest AI sector globally and the largest in Europe, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates that AI adoption could increase UK productivity growth by around £55bn a year. But harnessing innovation requires regulation. As I set out in the 2021 prime minister’s Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform, the UK as a trusted regulator has a chance to lead in setting appropriate regulatory standards in new markets from AI to fusion energy and space debris.
With the rapid dissemination of deepfake tools allowing someone’s identity to be stolen and misused by anyone, we should establish a fundamental right to identity protection in the digital age.
Recent evidence from the Science, Innovation and Technology Select Committee highlighted the scale of the challenge. When questioned, the big tech platforms showed little sense of responsibility for protecting UK values, democratic norms or citizens’ rights. By allowing US and Chinese tech dominance – controlled by a small group with limited accountability – we risk outsourcing digital sovereignty and undermining UK values, conventions and laws.
Other countries are beginning to act. Denmark has proposed strengthening protections over individuals’ likenesses in its copyright framework. In the US, some states are proposing new laws to prevent the unauthorised use of AI-generated digital replicas.
The tech industry is pushing back with a new pro-AI group, Innovation Council Action, supporting candidates and policies in US elections that oppose AI regulation. They have the support of Donald Trump’s adviser David Sacks, and plan to spend at least $100m on backing candidates. This comes on top of nearly $325m already raised by other pro-AI organisations and individuals.
Parliament now faces a choice: lightly regulate AI, or set clear, values-based rules to prevent it undermining our democracy, society and economy. Legislating to protect UK citizens, society, economy and democracy from the widespread abuse of identity theft is a good place to start.
Politics
Reform pledges 400,000 deportations, which is easy to do when you don’t know what money is
In the latest instalment of Reform’s performative posturing on immigration, the far-right populist party has pledged to review all asylum claims from the last five years. They’re claiming that a Reform government would deport anyone who claimed asylum after arriving in the UK on a visa.
We’ll leave aside for a moment the absolutely dire racism and xenophobia of any Reform ‘promise’. That’s basically a given at this point.
Rather, this proposal is bloody ridiculous on a purely practical level – and it illustrates one of the many (many) massive problems with these authoritarian jerks.
Time and again, Reform have showed that it can’t handle even the basics of public finance. Now, they’ve come out with a completely un-costed, eye-wateringly complex pledge that would break the immigration system.
A further 400,000 imaginary deportations from Reform
Under Reform’s latest ridiculous proposal, around 400,000 would be eligible for deportation. According to the BBC’s reporting, the reviews would target anyone who has asylum status, has overstayed a visa, or is from “a country deemed safe by a Reform-led government”.
This would be on top of the 600,000 deportations over 5 years that Reform previously pledged. The majority of this figure would be made up of people who arrived on small boats – a crisis which was itself caused by Nigel Farage and the other Leavers’ half-baked Brexit.
In order to carry out its draconian immigrant bashing, Reform have stated that they would withdraw the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
To be clear, the ECHR does very little to prevent any member state from deporting people, except in exceptional circumstances like a risk of torture. However, what the ECHR does do is protect our basic human rights, including the right to life, freedom of thought, and ability to vote – which shows where Reform’s priorities lie.
Zia Yusuf
In a typically rambling Twitter post, Zia Yusuf laid out some further ‘details’ of his party’s proposals. Yusuf calls himself the ‘shadow home secretary’, although Reform is 108 seats short of granting him that particular title.
Given that he doesn’t even know his own job, it’s unsurprising that the announcement was similarly half-baked:
Anyone who broke into the country illegally, or came in on a visa and overstayed to claim asylum (which is almost all of them) will have their status revoked and be deported.
This is an addition to all those currently in Britain illegally.
For years now, Britain has been suffering from a real-time invasion.
We barely even know where to start with this one. There’s the “broke in” phrasing, as though Dover has fucking double-glazing all round it. “Real-time invasion” also gets an honorable mention – as opposed to what exactly?
Then there’s the threat to remove anyone who arrived illegally, in addition to “all those currently in Britain illegally.” That’s typical Reform-brand efficiency for you.
Yusuf also stated that Reform would follow the US example of building “modular” detention facilities to hold 22,500 people before deportation. To be clear, the US facilities are concentration camps in all but name.
As of the most recent data from mid-2024, the UK’s immigration detention capacity stood at around 2,200 spaces. Even then, the government has been forced to use spaces like hotels, which weren’t built for purpose.
Reform, however, believes it can expand that capacity by ten times within 18 months. This is the same party that can’t even manage the logistics of local government, or their own tax returns.
The asylum caseload
Context is important here. Reform are proposing to review thousands of asylum cases, when the review system itself is well past breaking point.
For example, Labour recently stated that it would review asylum seekers’ status once every 30 months. Like Reform, they also stated that this would apply retrospectively for the last 5 years. However, research from the Refugee Council stated that this would be “unworkable and extremely costly”:
the Home Office would be required to conduct between 1.66 million and 1.9 million reviews of refugee status over the first decade. This would result in a total cost of between £1.1 billion and £1.27 billion, depending on how many people lose their protection at review.
The backlog of asylum cases has quadrupled since 2014. The most recent figures from December 2025 show that 48,700 people were still waiting for an initial decision. Likewise, a March 2026 government briefing stated that:
As of June 2024, the total ‘work in progress’ asylum caseload, which includes cases awaiting an appeal outcome and unsuccessful applicants subject to removal from the UK, consisted of 224,700 cases. Of these, 39% of cases were awaiting an initial decision and 61% had received an initial refusal and were awaiting some kind of further action.
In part, this is because applicants are waiting longer for an initial decision on their case. However, the UK government has also stated that the number of ‘removal actions’ (deportations) is also causing the number to spike.
‘Impractical farce’ from Reform
Given this dire context, it’s no wonder that the Lib Dems have already branded Reform’s pledge an “impractical farce”. Even the Tories called it a copy of their own policy “but without the detail”. For once, we’ve got to agree there – same racism, but with even less pretense to basic basic financial literacy.
Reform’s naked racism, xenophobia and bigotry is reason enough to dismiss any of their posturing immigration policies.
However, with the relentless focus on the fact that they’re a party of bottom-feeding scum, it’s easy to overlook the fact that they’re also pathetic failures of politicians who couldn’t even run a fucking church fête.
Any reporting which fails to ask Reform ‘How do you plan to pay for this rubbish?’ is collusion, at this point.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Politics Home Article | Time to talk tax: the cumulative burden on business

New analysis from the Mineral Products Association shows the tax burden on essential minerals producers has significantly increased, but has the weight become too much to bear?
With the UK tax burden at historic highs and demand for materials at historic lows, the mineral products sector is at risk of a business confidence and investment crisis. Substantial tax increases and increasing regulatory costs, set against the backdrop of low construction activity and demand, increase the sector’s concern about remaining competitive.
Mineral products are the foundation of the UK’s built environment. Our materials – aggregates, concrete, asphalt, cement, lime and a wide range of other minerals – are essential for the delivery of homes, buildings and infrastructure, and critical to other industries – steel, glass, ceramics, paper, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and food production. This range of activity in our sector exposes us to multiple layers of taxation and cost.
Until 2022, the tax burden on business was broadly stable compared to the previous five years. However, rapid-fire changes since then are resulting in significantly higher costs, with the combined tax burden expected to have risen by just under 30 per cent (26-29 per cent) since that time. For many of our members, in a time of sustained market weakness, this weight is becoming intolerable.
The largest tax burden increase has been in business rates, up 58 per cent compared to 2021/22. As with other businesses, rates are a significant fixed cost for industrial sites. Recent revaluations and changes to the multipliers structure have led to significant increases in liabilities for minerals products sites.
Cement works face the largest increase in their rates, at approximately £38,000 per plant. This is at a time when cement production is at its lowest since 1950, and low sales are being undercut by cheap and carbon-intensive foreign imports. Cement, the main ingredient in concrete, is vital for delivering the government’s growth and infrastructure plans, as well as achieving their industrial ambitions.
The sector has also endured hefty rises in more specific taxes that fewer sectors are exposed to. With heavy plant and vehicles for transportation being essential, the combined effect of the end of red diesel and the scheduled removal of the 5ppl duty cut has resulted in a significant rise in fuel costs. With an effective duty rate change of 54 per cent per litre, this will cost the industry £48m in extra duty a year.
Increased costs without market improvements are a direct threat to the long-term viability of mineral products businesses. They are facing the difficult decisions that could result in a permanent reduction in the capacity of the UK to supply itself with essential construction materials. Not only will we lose production capacity in minerals, but we will also lose sites and jobs. That will hamper economic recovery in the short term and growth and investment into the future.
Businesses in our sector directly employ 89,000 people and support 3.4m jobs in the supply chain. The pressure from a rising tax burden threatens these jobs, deters investment and could even undermine the future supply of essential domestic minerals. This will all affect the wider UK economy.
While rapid tax increases impact all industries, the burden on the mineral products sector will have a lasting effect on the country’s infrastructure and housebuilding goals. Caught under the combined weight of an increasing tax burden and falling demand for materials, our foundational industry needs reinforcement to ensure we can meet future material demand from domestic sources.
Politics
Politics Home | Illegal operators now account for almost half of all UK gambling advertising spend, with that share set to become the majority within two years

As MPs gather this week to debate gambling advertising, the real issue is not how much advertising there is, but who is behind it
Britain is now on course to reach a tipping point where illegal operators overtake licensed firms in advertising spend, fundamentally reshaping what consumers see.
New independent analysis from WARC, the global marketing intelligence firm, reveals that unregulated firms now account for close to half of all UK gambling advertising spend, and on current trends are set to become the majority within two years. WARC is also the source of the widely cited near £2bn gambling advertising figure used in media coverage, providing a consistent and authoritative picture of the market.
According to WARC, the total UK advertising market is forecast to reach £1.9bn by October 2026. But that figure masks what is really happening.
Licensed operators are reducing their advertising, with spend expected to fall by 9.2 per cent this year to £1.1bn. Meanwhile, the harmful unregulated sector is expanding rapidly, with spend projected to grow by 32 per cent and exceed £1bn within two years.
On current trends, by 2028, unregulated and illegal betting and gaming advertising is expected to account for the majority of total spend, overtaking licensed operators. This should serve as a wake-up call to policymakers across the House. Just a few years ago, licensed operators accounted for more than 80 per cent of gambling advertising spend. That share has now fallen to just over half and is projected to drop below 50 per cent within the next two years.
The direction of travel is clear: regulated firms are scaling back their advertising, while the harmful black market grows rapidly. That should give policymakers pause.
Advertising is simply how operators compete for customers. The real issue is whether that competition is happening within the regulated market or being captured by the illegal black market. Within the regulated market, there are enforceable standards: age verification, safer gambling tools, self-exclusion schemes, and clear accountability.
But the regulated sector is under increasing pressure. New tax changes, which make Britain one of the most heavily taxed betting and gaming jurisdictions in the world, and the current proposed financial risk assessment regime are adding cost and complexity.
That pressure is set to increase further. The industry has already committed to removing betting sponsors from the front of Premier League shirts from next season, a step we support as part of raising standards. But as visible, regulated advertising reduces, demand does not disappear. It shifts into less regulated channels, where illegal operators are already growing rapidly. This is already visible in football, with only 3 of the 11 Premier League front-of-shirt betting sponsors holding a full UK Gambling Commission licence.
That shift is happening across the advertising landscape, but it is most visible in digital channels, where unregulated operators are particularly active and enforcement is most challenging.
WARC’s analysis shows digital channels now dominate gambling advertising, with search and online display accounting for the largest share of spend.
Online and social media are more likely to reach under-18s than traditional broadcast media, making those protections harder to apply in practice.
Unregulated operators are not bound by UK standards. They do not carry out the same age checks or safer gambling measures, contribute to tax, sport or research, and often operate outside the reach of UK enforcement.
By contrast, the regulated betting and gaming sector supports 109,000 jobs, contributes £6.8bn to the UK economy and raises £4bn in tax each year. It is a significant British industry, generating growth, investment and employment across the country.
Yet the harmful black market is becoming an increasingly visible part of the advertising landscape.
The question is not simply whether there should be less advertising, but whether it is being driven by the regulated market or the illegal one.
Focusing on licensed operators is the wrong approach. It will not reduce advertising and risks driving further growth in the illegal market.
If current trends continue, Britain will soon reach a point where most gambling advertising no longer comes from within the regulated system.
That is not a safer market. It is one where consumers are exposed to operators with no safeguards, no accountability, and no protections.
The government must now go further and faster, building on its new black market taskforce and £26m in additional funding to the Gambling Commission to tackle it, to clamp down on illegal operators flooding advertising channels before they overwhelm the regulated market.
Politics
Council by-election results from yesterday and forthcoming contests
Leicestershire – Narborough & Whetstone
Reform UK 1,033 (33.0 per cent, -9.3 on 2025) Conservatives 927 (29.6 per cent, +5.1) Green Party 884 (28.2 per cent, +13.4) Lib Dems 134 (4.3 per cent, -3.6) Labour 124 (4.0 per cent, -4.8) Advance UK 28 (0.9 per cent, +0.9)
Reform UK hold
Northumberland – Cramlington South West
Conservatives 278 (34.2 per cent, +9.0 on 2025) Reform UK 212 (26.1 per cent, -13.3) Labour 187 (23.0 per cent, -5.8) Green Party 116 (14.3 per cent, +14.3) Independent 13(1.6 per cent, +1.6) Lib Dems 7 (0.9 per cent, +0.9)
Conservatives gain from Reform UK
Forthcoming contests
April 22nd
- Salford – Barton and Winton. (Labour held)
April 23rd
- Cornwall – Newquay Porth & Tretherras. (Reform UK held)
April 30th
- Malvern Hills – Tenbury. (Conservative held)
May 21st
- Dorset – Bridport. (Lib Dems held)
- Fylde – Kirkham. (Independent held)
- Lancaster – Castle. (Green Party held)
- Malvern Hills – Alfrick, Leigh & Rushwick – (Malvern Hills Independent held)
June 25th
- Aberdeen – George St/Harbour. (Lib Dem held)
Politics
Subtle Signs Of Boys Being Impacted By Manosphere: A Parent’s Story
After Louis Theroux’s latest documentary sparked a whole lot of conversation (and concern) over the growing popularity of ideologies shared by certain manosphere influencers, a parent has opened up about the subtle signs she noticed her sons were being influenced by such views years ago.
For those who haven’t come across the term, the manosphere is “a collection of websites, social media accounts and forums dedicated to men’s issues, from health and fitness to dating and men’s rights”, according to Robert Lawson, associate professor in sociolinguistics at Birmingham City University.
Yet it’s increasingly become associated with more extreme views – particularly anti-women and anti-feminist sentiments, as seen in Theroux’s documentary.
The impact of this kind of content is concerning – and parents and teachers are seeing it trickle down to school-age children. Not only can it impact the mental health of boys and men, per UN Women, but it amplifies harmful sexist stereotypes, teaches dangerous social and dating behaviour, and makes both digital and real-life spaces more hostile for women and girls.
Mandy Hickson, a former fast jet pilot who is now a motivational speaker, began to notice subtle changes in her two sons, then in their mid-teens, seven years ago “before figures like Andrew Tate [a self-proclaimed misogynist influencer] were widely known”.

In an Instagram post, she noted their language, tone and the way they spoke about women gradually changed.
“We started to notice a shift in attitude rather than behaviour initially, with small comments that didn’t quite align with the values we’d brought them up with,” she tells HuffPost UK.
“For example, despite growing up in a home where both my husband and I worked equally and shared parenting responsibilities, they began questioning why I would ‘want’ to work at all.“
There were comments suggesting that a woman’s role should be at home, and that men should be the providers. This was particularly surprising given they had grown up seeing a strong female role model in me as a former fast jet pilot.”
At the same time, their views on success and self-worth were also shifting.
“They began making quite extreme statements about money and status,” says Hickson. “For example, suggesting that if they reached a certain age and didn’t have significant financial success or material markers like expensive cars, they would see themselves as failures.
“That kind of black and white thinking felt very out of character.”
What did she do to address this?
It wasn’t a case of simply shutting the conversation down. “It would have been easy to challenge or dismiss those views outright, but instead we tried to stay curious,” Hickson explains.
“We asked questions like ‘Where have you heard that?’ or ‘Why do you think that matters?’, creating space for discussion rather than confrontation.”
The couple also made a conscious effort to reinforce their own values – around respect, partnership, and the idea that success isn’t one dimensional – through everyday conversations. “It wasn’t about lecturing, but about consistently offering a broader perspective,” she adds.
Experts generally agree lecturing teenagers is not an effective strategy, and listening without judgment is often the key to getting them to open up.
Hickson notes she also began supporting her sons in develop critical thinking skills, particularly in terms of questioning the content they were consuming.
“Rather than banning platforms or individuals outright, we talked about how algorithms work, how certain voices can be amplified, and why extreme views often gain traction,” she says.
“That seemed to help them step back and question what they were seeing.”
She advises parents to look for small shifts in language and attitudes (some boys might start referring to girls as ‘females’, for example), not just behaviour.
- Stay open and curious rather than immediately critical.
- Keep communication lines open, even when what you’re hearing is uncomfortable.
- Help your children question what they’re consuming, rather than simply trying to control it.
- Model the values you want them to hold, because that consistency really matters over time.
“It’s not a quick fix, and I don’t think any parent gets it perfectly right, but staying engaged and present in those conversations is key,” she adds.
In her Instagram reel, she also suggested boys need to actively be shown positive male role models because otherwise “the algorithm will show them something else”.
“This isn’t about blaming boys, it’s about paying attention,” she ended. “Because I’ve seen how quickly it can happen and how quietly it can grow.”
Politics
Tommy Robinson is selling ad space at his racist hate march
In May this year, Tommy Robinson is holding a follow-up to his rancid ‘Unite the Kingdom’ rally. The first event saw speakers calling for the deportation of the UK’s entire Black and Brown population. This year will no doubt see the same, and in Robinson’s eyes, that represents a marketing opportunity:
I’ve honestly seen it all now.
If you still didn’t realise Tommy Robinson is nothing but a massive grifter, here he is today — trying to sell advertising space at his next racist march.
Boycott any business that’s stupid enough to take him up on the idea. pic.twitter.com/9YT5BH0WsY — Wokerati Marty (@WokeratiMarty) April 19, 2026
Remigration
Undercover recordings from the first Tommy Robinson Unite the Kingdom rally exposed protesters chanting with what can only be described as genocidal intent:
He did it again. @NikoOmilana went under cover on the far-right Tommy Robinson rally.
"Sink the boat and send them back… take the life jackets off as well.. why not just kill them on the beach?" pic.twitter.com/tqc37U9cxu
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) September 27, 2025
Honestly, ‘protesters’ doesn’t feel like the right word.
Much like with the Britain First rally which took place in Manchester on 18 April, a sizeable number of these people were absolutely shitfaced. ‘Revellers’ is a more accurate description, but the thing they’re revelling in is hatred.
Speakers at the first event included Generation Remigration. As we reported in September 2025:
Who are Generation Remigration, you might ask?
Well, they’re the leading proponents of ‘remigration’, which is the plan to mass deport migrants and their descendants from European countries. We’re not quite sure how that will work in Britain given the continuous influxes of populations we’ve experienced since the Roman Empire, except we are sure, obviously – they’re talking about deporting Black and brown people. Please feel free to explain to us how that isn’t racist, but maybe wait until tomorrow if you’re already ten beers in; you wouldn’t want to say something you regret.
Some of the attendees were clearly fantasists who hold a bleak and violent view of the world. This view is being amplified by grifters like Robinson who seek to profit from hatred:
Someone's nan was at the Tommy Robinson far-right march saying she hates Black people & was carrying 3 knives in her bag for the "Blacks." & she wants them all to get out of the country
This is what they say when they think they're chatting to white people. Big up @NikoOmilana pic.twitter.com/g2aeJAyCb6
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) September 27, 2025
And this year, ‘profit from hatred’ is clearly part of the Unite the Kingdom mission statement.
Put your ad here, says Tommy Robinson
In the video at the top, Tommy Robinson says:
Right, here’s an opportunity that I can’t believe people haven’t snapped up and we need you to snap it up because we need to put on a larger, bigger, more successful event than the 13th of September. That is advertisement.
We can believe no one has snapped it up, honestly, because most brands don’t hyper-target their products at racist shitheads.
Robinson continued:
We had 66 million people watch our last event in September. That’s just on our stream. Then we had 150 live streamers who were videoing every second of it as well. You have the opportunity to reach those people with your branding.
It’ difficult to think of a brand which would want to associate themselves with the scenes above.
Maybe Skittles could change their slogan to: ‘Skittles: Taste the Racism‘.
Probably not, right?
Failed Reform MP Matt Goodwin is still promoting his allegedly AI-written slop book – maybe he could take out an advert?
It's not "weird", mainly because Matt GPT's book isn't, and never has been, "the No.1 paperback in Britain" overall, but also because he's posing in front of a "New Books for 2026" hardback display while promoting his paperback, which isn't available in hardback.
The week that… https://t.co/7op5xdUjFL
— GET A GRIP (@docrussjackson) April 18, 2026
Back to Robinson:
Remember, we’ve shifted. People didn’t used to want to stand with us. Now we have politicians, we have celebrities, we have all different people. There’s been a mass shift. It’s now acceptable. Cancel culture has been defeated in this arena.
There was a period after Trump’s re-election when brands briefly pivoted towards racism. Most famously, the American company Target lost around 30% of its value after rolling back diversity initiatives.
Since all that, brands have avoided attaching themselves to mainstream right-wing politics. As such, they’ll definitely avoid pissed-up hate fests like Robinson’s festival of racism.
The ranks are revolting
As we reported on 19 April, some of Tommy Robinson’s minions are demanding that the upcoming Unite the Kingdom should be a more violent affair:
STOP WHAT YOU’RE DOING!
THE FASH BROMANCE OF THE CENTURY IS ON THE ROCKS! Remember I said after Danny ‘Temu Tommy’ Thomas tried to confront me (& ended up confessing to sexual exploitation Well tragically it’s got worse — . (@LouiseRawAuthor) April 18, 2026
), he was getting flack for being an embarrassment?
pic.twitter.com/jIRRB2EmPT
Of course, it makes sense for a movement like Robinson’s to become violent. The guy is talking about banishing a sizeable portion of the population, after all – something which couldn’t be achieved without oppression.
The reason why Tommy Robinson wants to keep it non-violent is clear; it’s because he’s got ad space to sell.
Featured image via YouTube
By Willem Moore
Politics
Paid Period Leave Needs Broader Cultural Change To Work Well
Expert comment from Dr Amanda Shea, who holds a PhD in molecular biology and has contributed to ovarian cancer research and is the fractional chief science officer at period and cycle tracker app Clue.
This January, a menstrual leave petition asking the government to “introduce statutory paid menstrual leave of up to three days per month for people with conditions such as endometriosis and adenomyosis” was launched.
It has since passed 100,000 signatures, and so has met the threshold for parliamentary debate.
The topic will be debated in Westminster Hall. Menstrual leave already exists in countries like Spain, Portugal, Taiwan, Zambia, and Vietnam.
But in, e.g., Spain, the law has “hardly been used”, The Guardian reports.
HuffPost UK spoke to Dr Amanda Shea, who holds a PhD in molecular biology and has contributed to ovarian cancer research, about how to make laws like these more effective.
The broader culture needs to change
Menstrual leave policies like those introduced in Spain and Portugal “appear progressive” and “mark an important step in acknowledging menstrual and reproductive health at policy level,” Dr Shea said.
“Yet early reports suggest uptake has been low, likely due at least in part to persistent stigma, fears around job security, and concerns around being seen as unreliable or unproductive.
“This raises the question: are these policies truly helpful, or are they symbolic gestures that signal progressiveness without addressing the deeper cultural changes that are needed?”
That’s not to say that paid menstrual leave couldn’t be beneficial. As Dr Shea told us, “Menstrual pain and related symptoms can be genuinely debilitating and they deserve to be taken seriously. For some, menstrual symptoms can significantly affect their ability to work, and time off may be necessary, just as it would be for any other health condition”.
Her workplace, Clue, already uses paid menstrual leave. It’s not about discouraging laws which could make the lives of those suffering from painful conditions easier.
Sarah Ottawa, the chief people officer at the company, said that the policy has gone down well with employees, adding that her team “were very intentional about making the policy clear and stigma-free”.
But, Dr Shea said, more broadly. “The reality is that culture needs to evolve to match the intent of the policy. Many people still don’t feel safe disclosing menstrual pain, let alone using menstrual-specific leave. Without strong protections against discrimination, clear leadership support, and more open conversations about menstruation, these policies risk falling short.
“Importantly, supporting menstrual and reproductive health will require more than a single policy. It calls for systemic change that includes better health education, more research into female-prevalent conditions and treatment options, and improved access to quality care.”
Not all people with period conditions have a diagnosis, and not all women’s health issues take the form of period conditions
Then, there’s the fact that paid period leave would only cover those with diagnosed conditions. We know that women’s health issues remain disproportionately ignored and undiagnosed.
“Workplace policies are just one part of the bigger picture, and when they focus solely on leave, or apply only to a narrow set of symptoms or diagnoses, they risk excluding many people, reinforcing that pain should be endured in private, and missing the wider challenges people face in managing their health.”
Take, for instance, PMDD, which can leave people in serious distress and is period-related but often happens days before menses begins. “People with autoimmune diseases like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis, digestive conditions like IBS, or menstrual migraines often experience symptom flare-ups during certain phases of the cycle,” the expert added.
“It’s also important to dispel the myth that all menstruators need leave. Most don’t experience severe symptoms, and policies should reflect that menstrual experiences vary widely. Often, more flexible and inclusive solutions – like the ability to work from home, adjust hours, or take time for medical appointments – can be more effective.”
Those needs often extend beyond periods to fertility treatments, miscarriage recovery, postpartum support, and perimenopause care, too.
How can paid period policy be most effective?
As we’ve said, paid menstrual leave can be a great step forward.
But to make it most effective, Clue’s reproductive health specialist, Eve Lepage, said: “A thoughtful menstrual leave policy would be one that recognises menstruation as a spectrum of experiences, from regular, manageable cycles to severely debilitating symptoms due to conditions like endometriosis, adenomyosis, or PMDD.
“It would offer flexible, non-discriminatory support.”
- Leave it as an option, not a rule. People should be able to take time off when they need it, but it shouldn’t be assumed that everyone will or should.
- No requirement for proof or disclosure. Many people never receive formal diagnoses, often because of barriers in the healthcare system. Requiring a doctor’s note just to access support can leave people behind.
- Integration into broader wellness support. Menstrual leave should exist alongside things like flexible hours, remote work options, mental health days, and reproductive health leave, so it reflects the full range of cycle-related needs.
- Education to reduce stigma. Workplace education should accompany the policy to challenge outdated views of menstruation as shameful or disruptive.
- Inclusive language and design. Not all people who menstruate identify as women, and policies should reflect that.
Politics
Gen Z Habits That Stress Out Millennials
Gen Zers and millennials may technically be neighbors on the generational timeline, but culturally, they sometimes feel a universe apart.
From communication styles to news consumption to how they show up on social media, the two generations often approach the world in very different ways. And those differences can sometimes cause friction.
We asked millennials to share the Gen Z behaviours that stress them out. Of course, habits vary from person to person, but certain patterns and tendencies still emerge.
1. Recycling Our Bad Fashion Choices
2. Misusing Therapy Speak And Self-Diagnosing
“I am a big fan of normalising mental health conversations and people having access to the help they need. In fact, I love that about Gen Z. But with access comes misusing and misinterpreting words, like ‘triggered’ or ‘narcissism,’ as well as a rise in self-diagnosis. As a psychiatrist, I regularly see people who think they have a condition because TikTok told them they do. I appreciate that they show up in my office and ask about it to learn more, because not everyone does that step, and that TikTok even informed them about a diagnosis that resonated to begin with ― but it can sometimes lead to hard conversations when I say, for example, that not all trouble concentrating is ADHD.” ― Dr. Jessi Gold, psychiatrist and chief wellness officer at the University of Tennessee System
3. The Gen Z Stare
“I have noticed that Gen Z struggles with basic in-person social skills and communication. They are digital natives and can struggle to translate those skills to in-person interactions. The term ‘Gen Z stare’ exists for a reason; it’s real.” ― political and news commentator Millennial Mia
4. Disregarding Their Surroundings
“Three words: choreography in public. Doing a full routine on the top of the Empire State Building? Airport acrobats? All of it makes me feel so uncomfortable! Also, has anyone else noticed an uptick in people crossing the street whenever they feel like it? I see people fully look up at a green light, then look me in the eyes sitting in my car and wave and then walk. Is there no fear?” ― Balsham
5. Excessive Trauma Posting
“I think that Gen Z can turn even a stressful or traumatic moment into a funny post on TikTok and IG. Us Millennials do that sometimes as well, but Gen Z has a very specific way about it. Their house could be burning down and they’d post on social media ‘first house fire kinda nervous.’ They are so unserious and I find that very entertaining, impressive and stressful all at once haha. (I’m obligated as a millennial to end every sentence with a haha or lol).” ― lifestyle content creator Shaunie Begley
“Social media makes so many of my patients feel like they have to tell their entire life story to be considered ‘authentic’ and to get likes and follows. Sometimes that means they trauma dump publicly, instead of trying it out with a therapist and psychiatrist to process it privately first. Telling your story isn’t as easy as just saying it out loud, especially when public confessions often lead others to tell you their stories, too, or you open yourself up to criticism and trolls. I love that they want to talk about all of these hard topics and break down the stigma of the silence of them, but I just wish they just shared when they were emotionally ready, and not because they thought they were supposed to!” ― Gold

6. Getting The Majority Of Their News From Social Media
“They love to speak about subjects that they have zero experience in and their information comes from entertainment. They quote TikToks and Reels not understanding that most of the information is clickbait and not backed in facts or actual research.” ― Greivy, lifestyle influencer
7. So Much Millennial Criticism
“Growing up, my generation got called ‘lazy’ a lot by the generations before us. Now, even the generation after us seems to enjoy actively critiquing millennials, especially online! All through TikTok I’ve learned that, according to Gen Z, we aren’t parting our hair ‘correctly,’ we rely too heavily on the French tuck and most recently I saw a video calling out the ‘millennial smile.’ I’ll be completely honest, I did start parting my hair down the middle a few years ago in response! But as I get older, I care less and simply find it amusing. The amount of time Gen Z seems to spend deconstructing millennial characteristics feels… unique.” ― Nausheen Farishta, travel expert and author
“My biggest pet peeve is when Gen Zers criticise or make fun of our ‘dated’ clothing. I don’t remember our generation doing that to Gen Xers when we were in our 20s. And I’m not talking about looking back and laughing at the styles in old photos ― I’m talking about real-time comments in 2026, like pointing out when someone wears ankle socks or still rocks skinny jeans. Honestly, maybe we just don’t want to spend $100 on new jeans every year to keep up with the latest trends. For a generation that claims to care about sustainability, secondhand shopping and reducing clothing waste, it feels a bit hypocritical to judge others for not constantly updating their wardrobes.” ― Nadine Sykora, travel vlogger
8. Entitlement
“One thing I genuinely admire about Gen Z is how intentional they are about work-life balance. Millennials definitely started pushing that conversation, but Gen Z is actually enforcing it. They’re clear about their boundaries, what they want, and what they’re not willing to compromise on ― and I respect that. On the flip side, if I’m being honest, that same confidence can sometimes come across as entitlement. There can be an expectation of flexibility, growth or reward without always putting in the same level of time or grind that previous generations were used to. It’s a shift ― and not always a bad one ― but definitely noticeable. Overall, though, I think Gen Z is challenging norms in a way that’s forcing everyone to rethink how we work, date, and show up in the world ― which is pretty powerful.” ― Erin C., content creator
“They can be easily be discouraged and distracted when working on anything that’s not their personal interest! Blaming others for their lack of skill and experience instead of seeing it as a learning curve. And they also tend to take everything personal ‘why bother if it doesn’t serve me’ mentality it drives me crazy!” ― Greivy
9. Posting Without Filters
“You’d think what stresses me out most is the recycling of 2000s fashion ― low-rise jeans, capris, platform sandals ― but it’s actually the casual posting with minimal curation. As millennials, perfectionism, overthinking and curation are basically in our DNA. The 2010 era was all about aesthetically cohesive feeds and matching Ludwig filters. I’ve gotten better at posting on the fly, but I genuinely admire Gen Z’s ability to post whatever they want, whenever they want.” ― Kate Steinberg, social media personality
10. Confusing Communication At Work
“As Gen Z establishes itself in the workplace, there’s a learning curve on all sides. As the first generation of ‘digital natives’, the way Gen Z communicates (or doesn’t) at work could prove not only annoying but also confusing to their colleagues. I’ve been brought in to lead workshops for Gen Z in corporate settings on what effective communication and executive presence look like on the road to success, while we also explore ways to stay true to themselves along the way.” ― Farishta
“Their communication style can be a bit confusing for millennials. They use completely different emojis, memes and online shorthand, which sometimes makes it hard to understand what they mean right away.” ― Valerie Melnikova, comedian
11. Constant Social Media Immersion
“I’d say their relationship with social media is… a lot. And that’s coming from someone in the influencer space. There’s a level of constant immersion that can feel overwhelming at times ― like, log off and go touch grass for a second.” ― Erin C.
“I feel a deep sadness for them that they have no idea what life was like before social media when you just lived life for yourself and the moment and didn’t need to have a discourse with friends about what to post or who is watching your stories. I don’t think a single Gen Zer has ever been to a beach without posting a picture of their knees. Never has a glass of rosé been drank that wasn’t photographed. An Aperol spritz in Italy has never gone unstoried. There’s something about this need for attention that is deeply stressful” ― Balsham
Answers have been edited and condensed for clarity.
-
NewsBeat7 days agoTrump and Pope Leo: Behind their disagreement over Iran war
-
News Videos6 days agoSecure crypto trading starts with an FIU-registered
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Sports4 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Politics3 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Business2 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Crypto World3 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics11 hours agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Business4 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Politics2 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Tech2 days agoAuto Enthusiast Scores Running Tesla Model 3 for Two Grand and Turns It Into Bare-Bones Go-Kart
-
Tech5 days ago‘Avatar: Aang, The Last Airbender’ Leaked Online. Some Fans Say Paramount Deserves the Fallout
-
Crypto World3 days agoRussia Introduces Bill To Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Tech6 days agoMicrosoft adds Windows protections for malicious Remote Desktop files
-
Crypto World6 days agoX Launches New Cashtag Feature for Stocks and Crypto: X
-
Entertainment6 days agoDave Portnoy Slams Dianna Russini: ‘Makes Zero Sense’
-
Sports7 days agoYounger Than Sachin Tendulkar: Vaibhav Sooryavanshi Set To Make Historic India Debut
-
Entertainment6 days agoPrince Carter Brings Fans Front Row and Backstage at Boys 4 Life Tour
-
Sports5 days agoBritish climbers complete new route in Swiss Alps
-
Crypto World6 days agoGlobal recession inevitable if Strait of Hormuz stays shut

You must be logged in to post a comment Login