Connect with us

Politics

Tommy Robinson endorses Reform’s Matt Goodwin for byelection

Published

on

Tommy Robinson endorses Reform's Matt Goodwin for byelection

As we’ve reported, Reform’s candidate for Gorton & Denton is the academic and establishment insider Matt Goodwin. The constituency has a high percentage of black and minority ethnic voters (44%) — people that Goodwin has suggested are ‘not British’. This is already creating a problem for Goodwin, and it won’t help that he’s has now attracted the support of England’s most notorious far-right activist:

Little Tommy Robinson

As we previously reported, Generation Remigration spoke at Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally. ‘Remigration’ is the plan to mass deport migrants and their descendants from European countries. And as we said at the time:

Advertisement

We’re not quite sure how that will work in Britain given the continuous influxes of populations we’ve experienced since the Roman Empire, except we are sure, obviously – they’re talking about deporting Black and brown people.

Tommy Robinson’s friends would happily deport 44% of the Gorton & Denton population; so would Robinson, presumably, given his continued promotion of remigration:

It can’t feel good for the residents of Gorton & Denton to know the Reform candidate is supported by those who would deport them or their neighbours. Honestly, though, ‘deport’ isn’t the right word here; we’re talking about ethnic cleansing.

Advertisement

Robinson’s movement have also proven to be a danger in other ways too:

Opposition

Labour MPs are drawing attention to the Robinson-Goodwin connection, with Anna Turley demanding that Reform’s man distances himself from the far right (or further far right, anyway):

Advertisement

The problem is Labour blocked their best chance of winning in Gorton & Denton – namely Andy Burnham. As such, it’s hard to believe they’re serious about winning. The Green’s, meanwhile, are running a Mancunian plumber who’s saying things besides vote for me or get Reform‘:

As Spencer herself wrote for Huffington Post:

We are not a poor country, we’re not a poor city – but government after government has treated us poorly. I see that in the cold homes, the repairs that people save up for months to do and the struggle that so many of us have with our mental health.

That’s why my number one priority will always be taking action to cut the cost of living – cheaper bills through public ownership, rent controls, free bus travel for young people. Insulating homes properly.

While Reform refuse to make the richest in our society pay their fair share, and flirt with privatising the NHS, I’ll be a champion for slashing inequality, re-wiring our economy to work for all of us and giving people the physical and mental healthcare they need.

Advertisement

For more on Robinson, you can read Canary articles on him or watch this investigation from Sangita Myska:

Featured image via Reform UK

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

What Straight Men Bring Up Most Often In Sex Therapy

Published

on

What Straight Men Bring Up Most Often In Sex Therapy

Sexologist comment provided by licensed sexologist, relationship therapist, and author at Passionerad, Sofie Roos.

Sexologist and therapist Sofie Roos tells me that, in her job, “straight men regularly seek my help to get guidance” on their sex lives.

In fact, she said, “I want straight men to know that they’re far from alone” when it comes to physical and mental issues in the bedroom.

Here, she told HuffPost UK about what straight men bring up the most in her sessions.

Advertisement

Erectile changes are the most common topic Roos hears

Issues like erectile dysfunction are the “main reason for hetero men seek professional help,” Roos said.

That can include getting and/or keeping an erection. “Stress, performance anxiety, and increased age are the most common causes.”

The sexologist said premature ejaculation is the next most common topic.

Advertisement

Thirdly, straight men often come to Roos with concerns about “problematically high and low libido, where a high interest in sex feels difficult to control… while a low libido often negatively affects romantic relationships”.

And body image concerns, like “being worried about penis size, looks, or one’s sexual skills,” which Roos said are “often affected by porn and unrealistic ideals,” are “common causes that make straight men seek professional sexual help”.

Throughout many of these concerns, the sexologist told us that “performance anxiety is almost always part of the picture.”

She said the men she sees in her work often don’t feel “man enough”, and “have difficulties… separating sex from performance… many men have been taught that their sexual value is what they can perform in bed.

Advertisement

“Many hetero men have grown up hearing that they should always be strong, know what they want, never show weakness, they should always want sex, and they need to perform.

“To say ‘I can’t get hard’, ‘I’m not in the mood’, or ‘I’m a bit unsure of what to do’ then feels like a threat to the ‘manly’ identity, which makes it way more difficult to talk with a partner or a friend.”

That, the sexologist said, can mean some straight men wait too long to get professional help.

What advice does Roos have for straight men?

Advertisement

In general, the sexologist said she wished straight men were less focused on their erections. “Remember that it’s a complicated function, and that it not always will work the way you want it to, just as a woman not always will get wet ― and this is okay, and must not mean that something is wrong,” she said.

“Secondly, I wish that more men could try to separate performance from intimacy. Sex is not a sport, but an emotional experience, and you should therefore shift focus from ‘How do I maximise my accomplishment?‘, to ‘How does this feel between us?’”

This, she told us, can relieve feelings of pressure and lead to better sex.

She also said that some men could benefit from considering lifestyle choices when evaluating their sexual satisfaction. “Diet, exercise, sleep, alcohol and porn consumption,” as well as communication with your partner and stress management, can all play a role.

Advertisement

Lastly, she said, “don’t stay away from seeking help if you feel you can’t deal with these issues alone. Sexual health is part of your general health, and should be treated that way.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Says He Brought ‘Justice’ To Iran. His War Boosts Fears The US Has Gone Rogue.

Published

on

A screen grab from a video released on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account shows Donald Trump making statements regarding combat operations on Iran on February 28, 2026 in Pal Beach, Florida, United States. (Photo by US President Trump Via Truth Social/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Roughly twelve hours after he launched a war on Iran early on Saturday morning, President Donald Trump said his military campaign had killed the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“This is not only Justice for the people of Iran, but for all Great Americans, and those people from many Countries throughout the World, that have been killed or mutilated by Khamenei,” the president wrote on Truth Social.

But Trump’s effort to frame his war of choice as just and worthy of international celebration is a long shot. Instead, the administration’s latest military escalation is boosting a perception globally that could permanently and significantly hurt America’s and Americans’ role in the world: the view of the US as a rogue actor, fuelling instability, acting illogically and even illegally and risking innocent lives.

For all the questions remaining about the offensive – How long will it go on? Does the US have a plan to replace the regime if it falls? Is there any remaining hope for de-escalation? — a further degradation of America’s image abroad, including among its traditional allies, is one of few certainties.

Advertisement

“Even before today, the pattern was clear: this is a state that actively disregards international law and its protections for civilians, which makes civilians – makes children, makes pregnant mothers, make people who have nothing to do with geopolitical aims at all – less safe everywhere: in Gaza, in Canada, in Europe, in Asia,” said Mark Kersten, a professor at the University of the Fraser Valley in Canada. “Even in America itself, because international law is an important way to protect people in their own countries.”

Kersten characterised the new war as “unequivocally illegal… a wanton and clear violation” of the United Nations charter.

A screen grab from a video released on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account shows Donald Trump making statements regarding combat operations on Iran on February 28, 2026 in Pal Beach, Florida, United States. (Photo by US President Trump Via Truth Social/Anadolu via Getty Images)
A screen grab from a video released on U.S. President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account shows Donald Trump making statements regarding combat operations on Iran on February 28, 2026 in Pal Beach, Florida, United States. (Photo by US President Trump Via Truth Social/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Trump began his offensive in Iran, in partnership with Israel, without even attempting to rally broader support from other countries or some legal basis for an attack through the UN Security Council, as former president George W. Bush did before the invasion of Iraq. He proceeded to assassinate Khamenei, who, while widely reviled, was a sitting head of state.

An anonymous US official eventually claimed to reporters that the U.S. acted preemptively in anticipation of an Iranian missile attack on American forces – but the administration has released no evidence of an imminent assault, experts see that prospect as very unlikely and another anonymous source contradicted the Trump administration’s claim to CNN. And the war represented the second time in less than a year Washington purported to be prioritising diplomacy with Tehran before choosing war.

Meanwhile, the administration has not offered any US plan to prevent a spiral of violence and atrocities in Iran and across the Middle East. A strike in the US-Israeli operation hit an Iranian primary school, killing more than 100 people, mostly schoolgirls, and throughout Saturday, Iranian retaliation struck neighbouring countries aligned with the US, wounding people and targeting civilian sites like airports and a hotel.

Advertisement

Given those facts, officials in the region and in Europe are alarmed, and their US counterparts are unlikely to be able to reassure them and encourage confidence in Trump’s strategy, said Jennifer Gavito, a former State Department official with senior roles across administrations of both parties.

Smoke rises on the skyline after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (AP Photo)
Smoke rises on the skyline after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (AP Photo)

“I look back to Libya and Iraq,” she said, referring to the chaos and mass death following American regime change missions in both countries. “I don’t know what reassurance could have been given in that moment – and especially with the benefit of history now on our side how you confidently project” success.”

Gavito noted public comments decrying the war from the foreign minister of Oman, which had sought to mediate between the U.S. and Iran: “It speaks to the betrayal that [other nations] feel that yet again we seemingly used negotiations as a cover and pretext for a strike that makes us in the future less of a credible partner.”

Reports suggest US and Israeli officials quietly planned the Iran campaign for months, even as Trump repeatedly said publicly that he wanted a deal.

The coming days and weeks are likely to bolster scepticism of the American strategy as Trump has offered conflicting visions of the resolution to the conflict, saying that he wants to see Iranian civilians abandon and topple the government and that he plans to continue bombing. A quick settlement on the core area of disagreement between Tehran and Washington – Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities – is hard to imagine as a more hardline leadership is expected to succeed Khamenei and seek to project strength and resistance.

Advertisement

“We have already made this existential for the Iranian regime….so they have no incentive,” Gavito said. Already loath to make big concessions, Iran had reportedly this week offered greater limits on its nuclear development than it had in a previous nuclear deal with world powers, which Trump abandoned.

Waging a bloody, domestically unpopular and unauthorised war without a clear end, the Trump administration is unlikely to attract greater international backing.

Disdain rooted in the Iran policy will compound wariness of the US’s conduct and judgment in recent years in various contexts, from Trump’s kidnapping of Venezuela’s president last month to Gaza, in which Trump and before him President Joe Biden have defied calls to reconsider heavy American support for devastating Israeli policies decried by most countries.

“Coming after the Gaza war, where the US was seen in violation of international law and working against all human rights statutes by enabling Israeli genocide, we have now another instance by another admin of a different political view, confirming again that the US does not work according to international law,” said Randa Slim of the Stimson Center think tank. “The US is increasingly seen as a country that does not play by the book.”

Advertisement
U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) walks through the halls of the U.S. Capitol on February 12, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)
U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) walks through the halls of the U.S. Capitol on February 12, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Michael M. Santiago via Getty Images

To the Trump administration, its allies and others, global goodwill and legitimacy may seem irrelevant. Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch proponent of attacking Iran and defender of Israeli conduct, on Saturday attacked European countries for suggesting the US should return to diplomacy with Tehran.

“It is so sad to see Western democracies lose their passion for justice and a sense of right and wrong,” Graham wrote on X. “You’re suggesting we should continue to negotiate with religious Nazis. It is pathetic.”

And Iran on Saturday also drew criticism from national security and legal analysts and other observers for its attacks on nearby countries, which had repeatedly said they did not want to see a war with their neighbor and attempted to overcome years of mutual distrust.

“These actions …set back years of rapprochement,” Slim said, noting Arab nations had recently come to see Israel’s heightened regional power as a greater threat but the risk posed by Iran was now “reemphasised.”

Advertisement

But with many people around the globe now wondering how US policy could unexpectedly spiral and harm them, Kersten described a heightened foreign focus on disconcerting Washington policy-making and the hope of changing it.

“Blatant threats to [Canada’s] sovereignty were in some ways a harbinger for how states can navigate [the Trump era] and I don’t think they have figured out how to navigate this,” he said, pointing to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s embrace of the attack on Iran despite his high-profile recent remarks urging countries to re-emphasise the importance of law and principles in international politics.

Kersten suggested foreigners are still searching for “voices of reason” in the United States, and feel dismayed by what they are seeing.

“If this dangerous path is to stop, it is only going to stop because of the actions of people within the United States,” Kersten said. “Canada can’t stop it . Middle Eastern partners have demonstrated they can’t stop it .. the UN will not. No international organisation or tribunal or coalition of states, whether [the European Union] or any other entity can.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bridgerton Season 5: What Do We Know About The Show’s Future?

Published

on

Claudia Jessie as Eloise and Hannah Dodd as Francesca in Bridgerton

Times may change and TV tastes evolve, but there’s something enduringly appealing about a period drama – especially when it’s one as doused in sauciness as Bridgerton.

Four seasons in, Netflix’s Regency romp is still going strong after raking in nearly 40 million views in the new series’ first four days alone, proving that there’s still a market for yearning and a well-crafted sex scene.

If you’re all done with season four and wondering what the future holds for Bridgerton, we’ve done all the research to answer fans’ most burning questions.

Bridgerton has officially been renewed for two more seasons by Netflix, which will take us up to season 6. But with two more books and Bridgerton siblings left to take the spotlight after season 6 – it’s probable that won’t be the end (especially if Shonda Rhimes gets her way).

Advertisement

Here’s everything we know so far…

When will Bridgerton season 5 be filmed?

Although there hasn’t been any official line on this yet, showrunner Jess Brownell teased that production on Bridgerton season 5 will begin “very soon” in an interview with Decider.

This seems to tee up with recent unconfirmed reports claiming that filming would begin in March 2026.

Advertisement
Claudia Jessie as Eloise and Hannah Dodd as Francesca in Bridgerton
Claudia Jessie as Eloise and Hannah Dodd as Francesca in Bridgerton

When will Bridgerton season 5 be released?

That’s a trickier question to answer.

Again, Netflix hasn’t given any official indication on this yet – but based on the previous Bridgerton release pattern of there being around 18 months to two years between seasons, we could be looking at a release date of late 2027 or early 2028.

Having said that, Jess has said she is keen to cut down the two-year gap between seasons, recently telling Radio Times that the creators never planned for what many fans deemed a lengthy wait.

“I think there’s only been a year and a half actually between season three and four,” she claimed. “And we are on track with season five so far, fingers crossed, to either meet or match that year and a half mark.”

Advertisement

“We’re always trying to keep the trains going faster and faster,” she added.

Which Bridgerton sibling will season 5 be about?

It’s already been confirmed that seasons five and six will follow Bridgerton sisters Eloise and Francesca played by Claudia Jessie and Hannah Dodd, respectively. As for which of them will go first and get their story told in season five, Jess is still currently keeping us all guessing.

There’s a possible hint that it could be Eloise’s turn next in season four’s post-credit sequence, where she declares “I do love a wedding”.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the death of John in season four also suggests that Francesca’s burgeoning relationship with Michaela could be the focus of the next run of episodes, too.

Masali Baduza as Michaela and Hannah Dodd as Francesca in Bridgerton
Masali Baduza as Michaela and Hannah Dodd as Francesca in Bridgerton

So far, Netflix hasn’t stayed entirely true to the order of the books Bridgerton is based on.

While seasons one and two were faithful to the novels’ running order – following Daphne and then Anthony – the TV series switched the third and fourth stories to focus on Colin in season three and Benedict in season four.

Should Netflix decide to follow the books again, season five will follow Eloise. But for now we’ll have to wait and see…

If Netflix follows the order of the Bridgerton novels, Eloise will be next up to land her own season
If Netflix follows the order of the Bridgerton novels, Eloise will be next up to land her own season

How many seasons of Bridgerton have been confirmed by Netflix so far?

Bridgerton has officially been renewed for two more seasons by Netflix, which will take us up to season 6. And with with two more books and Bridgerton siblings left to take the spotlight after season 6 – it’s probable that won’t be the end.

Advertisement

What have the creators of Bridgerton said about the show’s future?

Creator and producer Shonda Rhimes has no qualms about sharing her plans for Bridgerton to run for “exactly eight” seasons.

She’s also teased “a possibility for spin-offs”, which means as long as people are streaming Bridgerton, there could be a healthy future for the series.

All four seasons of Bridgerton are streaming now on Netflix.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bridgerton Season 4: 11 Behind-The-Scenes Facts About How The Show Was Made

Published

on

Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha in Bridgerton season four
Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha in Bridgerton season four
Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha in Bridgerton season four

Bridgerton is back for a new run of episodes with more dramatic romances, extravagant costumes and even bigger wigs.

The second half of season four follows bohemian Benedict Bridgerton as he continues his search for the mysterious Lady in Silver, after meeting her at a masquerade ball, not realising she’s actually Sophie Baek, who a maid he has also fallen for.

As the love story between Benedict and Sophie – played by Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha – unfolds, the pair must overcome a societal divide in order to be together.

With season four proving just as popular with Netflix users as ever, we’re going behind the scenes to find out how the team brought Julia Quinn’s books to life – and how the actors made those steamy love scenes look so realistic…

Yerin Ha initially had doubts about playing Sophie in Bridgerton as she was worried her British accent wasn’t up to scratch

Advertisement

Australian actor Yerin Ha has admitted she was surprised to land the role of Sophie because she thought her attempts at a British accent were “terrible.”

Speaking to InStyle, she said that even after she landed a chemistry read with Luke Thompson over Zoom, she still thought there was no way she’d get the role.

“I just assumed that he probably had a day full of auditions, and he must be tired,” she recalled. “So I didn’t want to waste his time. I didn’t even really have chit-chat. I just got straight into the scene.”

Yerin Ha behind the scenes of Bridgerton season 4
Yerin Ha behind the scenes of Bridgerton season 4

Fortunately, Luke didn’t share her feelings about the Zoom call, and remembers their chemistry read very differently.

“I just remember feeling, despite the artifice of an audition, the Zoom delay, and shaky internet connection, that we were actually talking to each other,” he explained.

Advertisement

The Bridgerton writing team changed Sophie’s original surname to reflect Yerin Ha’s background

In Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton book series, Sophie’s surname is Beckett. In the show, they switch it to Baek to honour Yerin’s own background.

Yerin revealed that the showrunner Jess Brownell asked the actor if there were any Korean names that start with B, so there was still a connection to the character from the books, with the actor offering up Baek, feeling it was a seamless swap.

“I was just super appreciative of her changing the last name so that it fits with my identity and my culture and how I look,” Yerin told Elle.

Advertisement

“For some people, it might feel like a small thing, but for a production of that size to mold a character to me really empowered me.”

Sophie’s costumes in Bridgerton were also inspired by Yerin Ha’s South Korean heritage

The costume designer added some Korean influences to Sophie’s outfits in a special shout-out to the actor’s heritage.

“Her necklace is based on an Asian necklace that’s amethyst, which is the stone of Korea. That’s a little tiny Easter egg to her history that her mother gave her,” costumer John Glaser told The Kit.

Advertisement

Yerin added to Refinery29: “The fact that the costume department even thought about that and nailed the details, it just goes to show how much thought goes into everything, from the set to the costumes.”

Sophie and Benedict's first meeting at a masquerade ball early on in Bridgerton season 4
Sophie and Benedict’s first meeting at a masquerade ball early on in Bridgerton season 4

Benedict Bridgerton’s glow-up for season 4 was a subtle one

In the past, when a Bridgerton brother becomes the main focal point of a series, they usually get a glow-up and a new wardrobe to make them more leading-man-ready.

For Benedict, this transformation was more subtle than those of his brothers – although there were some subtle shifts.

Costume designer John Glaser told The Kit that Benedict’s wardrobe was inspired by 1980s New Romantics, making use of sheer fabrics and frilled collars.

Advertisement

“This season we’ve taken the men and we Gucci’d them up,” he joked.

In an interview with Vogue, Glaser explained that his wardrobe was also inspired by Joseph Fiennes in Shakespeare In Love.

“Because we’ve gone forward in time a little bit in the show, the men’s silhouette has become softer and a little more open,” the Emmy winner explained. “And Benedict specifically, we’ve pushed him into the future a bit so that he’s not as restricted as the other men on the show.”

Yerin Ha and Luke Thompson on the set of Bridgerton with showrunner Jess Brownell
Yerin Ha and Luke Thompson on the set of Bridgerton with showrunner Jess Brownell

Araminta’s look in Bridgerton season 4 was also inspired by someone from modern times

Sophie’s “evil” stepmother Araminta Gun (played by Katie Leung), does something no woman has ever done before in all four seasons of the period drama.

Advertisement

“As far as women in Bridgerton, she’s our first character to wear black,” Glaser told The Kit.

The decision to dress Araminta in black was not because she was supposed to come across as evil, though. Instead, her dark attire represents the fact she’s a widow, who feels separated from the rest of society.

“Her shape and silhouette aren’t Regency – it’s a little 1820 mixed with 1970,” Glaser told Vogue. “We gave her as much texture and subtle sparkle as possible – it’s like this reflective shield that she’s wearing, it’s her armour.

“She has a stronger silhouette than other characters and we never see her skin.”

Advertisement

Showrunner Jess Brownell compared Araminta to Anna Wintour, telling Vogue: “Anna, when you see her walking down the street, you know right away who she is. You’re not afraid of her, but you’re going to respect her. You see her coming and you better be ready. She’s a strong person.”

(L-R) Isabella Wei, Katie Leung and Michelle Mao behind the scenes of Brigderton
(L-R) Isabella Wei, Katie Leung and Michelle Mao behind the scenes of Brigderton

The kite scene was the first that Luke Thompson and Yerin Ha filmed together

While their masquerade ball meeting was what set the ball rolling for their characters, this was not the first time that Yerin and Luke were on set together.

In fact, episode three’s kite-flying sequence was the first scene the duo filmed together, something they have admitted to feeling relieved about, because it allowed them to let their walls down and relax into the characters.

“The weather was beautiful. I was wearing Daphne’s borrowed dress. I felt really beautiful. I felt like Cinderella,” Yerin told Town & Country.

Advertisement

“That’s really where Benedict and Sophie’s relationship blossoms,” she also told Tudum. “It’s a parallel between Luke and me, because that’s where our friendship started to blossom as co-stars. I have a nostalgic, sentimental attachment to that place now.”

Sophie and Benedict flying a kite together early on in their Bridgerton love story
Sophie and Benedict flying a kite together early on in their Bridgerton love story

The costumes at Bridgerton’s first masquerade ball were supposed to look ‘mismatched’

The scene of Benedict and Sophie’s first meeting was an elaborate feast for the eyes, with Bridgerton’s resident costume designer creating more than 172 costumes for the scene.

Costumer John Glaser has opened up how they put together the looks for the masquerade, telling Town & Country: “We actually thought the people from the town would come to the ball, so it would be a mixed match of everything, which is what we tried to do.

“We just thought of each person that would come, what they would make up at home. It’s not a Halloween party, but at a Halloween party, everybody has made their clothes or borrowed clothes. It’s just a mismatch stuff. And we wanted it to be exotic.”

Advertisement
Benedict unknowingly meets Sophie at a masquerade ball early on in Bridgerton season 4
Benedict unknowingly meets Sophie at a masquerade ball early on in Bridgerton season 4

As for the wigs, the team made 160 in total for the scene, with the most elaborate one being worn by Queen Charlotte.

Her elaborate design featured “a heart-shaped outer cage crafted from hair and adorned with silver leaf, and inside sits a replica of the nuptial crown that George gifted her – also made from hair”.

This was a nod to the queen’s late husband, and the Bridgerton prequel Queen Charlotte which followed the couple in their younger years.

The set of the Bridgerton masquerade ball was inspired by one literary classic in particular

It wasn’t just the costumes that the team put immense detail into for the ball scene.

Advertisement

The production designer, Alison Gartshore, themed the masquerade set around William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, adding lots of drapes to the dream-like setting alongside white florals.

Gartshore explained to Town & Country that the flowers were meant to feel like “the servants had gone out into the estate and just got whatever they could find – ivy, twigs, birds’ nests, the odd horn here and there, and they really kind of woven these garlands together from their own land”.

“All the florals had to be white because we wanted to look sort of moonlight flavour to it,” she continued. “It ended up looking really quite magical.”

Bridgerton’s racy staircase scene was much less sexy to film in real life than it appeared on screen…

Advertisement

Bridgerton is known for its sex scenes, and season four was no different.

In the first half of the season, Benedict and Sophie have in an intimate moment in a stairwell – in what served as a metaphor for the class divide between them.

This may have looked steamy on screen, but the atmosphere on set was apparently a lot less sexy.

“What we actually did is we both got ill. But different scenes. We kept falling ill!” Luke told E! News.

Advertisement

Yerin added: “We were very mentally a little bit weak, a little bit nervous, my immune system was down…”

Benedict and Sophie's most romantic moment played out in a cliffhanger scene that took place on a staircase
Benedict and Sophie’s most romantic moment played out in a cliffhanger scene that took place on a staircase

…And, for that matter, so was Bridgerton season 4’s infamous bathtub scene

Benedict and Sophie’s bathtub sequence was one of the most anticipated moments of Bridgerton season four.

Luke and Yerin have admitted that the scene was an especially slippery one to film – namely because production kept putting oil in the water.

“We were like two seals, because they kept pouring in this thing to make it milky, but I think it had oil in it,” Luke explained to Refinery29.

Advertisement

Yerin also revealed that, at just 5’2”, the long bathtub prop presented its own issues, with Luke joking: “She kept floating down the river. We had to sort of brace a little bit.”

It wasn’t just oil and the depth of the bathtub that caused issues for the actors, though.

“I put baby powder all on me because I was told it would help dry my skin to put the intimacy wear on with my tape,” Yerin recalled to Capital Breakfast.

“And then, basically, the next day, after the bathtub, I got hives all over my body, and I got folliculitis, so I needed steroid cream!”

Advertisement

Bridgerton fans can visit Benedict’s cottage in person

Sophie and Benedict take refuge in Benedict’s sizeable countryside estate, imaginatively named My Cottage.

In real life, the scene where the couple has breakfast together was shot at Loseley Park. The Grade I listed manor was built in the 1560s and is closely linked to the Tudor family.

You can visit this 1,400 acre Surrey estate in person as it’s open to the public. You can even stay in one of the cottages on the estate – although sadly, it does not include a Bridgerton brother.

Advertisement

All four seasons of Bridgerton are now streaming on Netflix.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Says Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei Is Dead

Published

on

.

Donald Trump has said that Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was dead following the joint US and Israeli strikes on Iran.

“Khamenei, one of the most evil people in History, is dead,” Trump said in a statement on Truth Social.

Khamenei was “unable to avoid our Intelligence and Highly Sophisticated Tracking Systems,” Trump wrote, adding that there was “not a thing he, or the other leaders that have been killed along with him, could do.”

.
.

TruthSocial/@realDonaldTrump

Khamenei, 86, had held ultimate control over Iran’s political, military and religious institutions as Iran’s supreme leader since 1989. He had no known successor, per the Associated Press, making his death likely to create a power vacuum.

Advertisement
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, seen here in 2024, is dead following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, President Donald Trump announced.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, seen here in 2024, is dead following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, President Donald Trump announced.

Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP

Trump had announced in the early hours of Saturday that the US and Israel had launched a major attack on Iran.

In his announcement, he seemed to push for regime change, urging the Iranian people to “seize control” of their “destiny.” He echoed that sentiment in his statement on Khamenei, calling the situation “the single greatest chance for the Iranian people to take back their Country.”

However, Trump said that “the heavy and pinpoint bombing” of Iran will continue “uninterrupted throughout the week” or “as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!”

Iranian state media said on Saturday evening that at least 201 people were killed and 700 injured in the strikes, with more than 50 killed in a strike on a girls’ school.

Advertisement

Iran retaliated with its own strikes on Israel as well as US military bases throughout the region. As of Saturday afternoon, the US military had reported no American casualties.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

FIFA hypocrisy after Israel murder over 400 Palestinian footballers

Published

on

The Board of Peace and FIFA have announced plans to build 55 football pitches, an academy, and a national stadium in Gaza. Meanwhile, Israel has murdered over 400 footballers, destroyed every football pitch in the country, and made millions of Palestinians homeless.

Yet now, a board of rich, old, and (all but one) white men is deciding Gaza’s fate. This is after supplying weapons and supporting Israel’s genocide for over two years. 

The hypocrisy is off the charts. 

Since October 2023, Israel has murdered at least 437 Palestinian footballers — and that figure could actually be far higher.

Advertisement

Over half of these were children.

Israel destroyed all 51 football clubs, along with 9 stadiums and the communities that came with both.

Advertisement

Turning pitches into graveyards

At one point, Israel bombed a football pitch at a Palestinian refugee camp in Southern Lebanon, whilst 13 children were playing on it.

Advertisement

Israel then claimed it struck a ‘Hamas training compound’.

Of course, FIFA has turned a blind eye for over two years as Israel has murdered innocent people.

FIFA quickly suspended Russia from international tournaments after it illegally invaded Ukraine. But of course, it did not take the same action when Israel launched its full-scale genocide on Palestine.

As the Canary previously reported:

Advertisement

FIFA has ignored restrictions on the movement of Palestinian players and the targeting of stadiums and sports facilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the imposition of Israeli clubs in settlements at the expense of Palestinian federations.

Now, FIFA is using a Trump-esque AI video. Could they create something more fucked up if they tried?

Anyway, in what world is this Gaza:

This looks more like the UAE than Gaza.The men’s attire shown above is primarily associated with Gulf states. The racist AI video generator clearly cannot distinguish between different Arab populations — and FIFA apparently didn’t bother checking what its own use of AI produced before publishing it.

Advertisement

Orientalism at its finest.

FIFA enabling ethnic cleansing

As if it was not bad enough that FIFA has been allowing Israel to compete internationally. Now, it is an active participant in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

Israel has murdered tens of thousands of Palestinians, and the West collectively ignored it. Now they’re going to jump on the graves of children to expand their capitalist empires as if Palestine has not suffered enough for the last 70 years.

We can only presume that this is some sort of soft launch for a future tournament in Israel. Of course, the powers that be – who happen to be mainly friends-of-nonces- will have no intention of including Palestine in said tournament. That’s if there are even any footballers left to invite because Israel has murdered them all.

Advertisement

If the board of peace, Israel, or FIFA think that a few new stadiums will make the world collectively forget the brutality of the last two years, they have another thing coming.

And who’s to say Israel would not bomb new stadiums as soon as Palestinians set foot in them? The rest of the world watches on as Israel labels whatever the hell they like Hamas targets and gets away with cold-blooded murder.

Advertisement

Neither a sporting governing body nor a ‘board’ made up of rich old men should be allowed any part in building on the graves of children.

Feature image via VERTEX/YouTube

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Published

on

Churchill statue branded ‘zionist war criminal’ in Whitehall

Conservatives and fascists got two absolute spankings last night. First, their man lost in the Gorton and Denton by-election. Then an activist graffitied Churchill’s statue in Whitehall — and not for the first time. That’s a tough 24hrs for people who think they’re living in the movie Zulu because they once saw an Asian person in Big Asda.

Here’s the Canary’s news report on the incident.

You can see the ‘damage’ — I mean, it does just wash off — below:

Poor Winston got called a ‘Zionist war criminal’. Another part of the graffiti said ‘stop the genocide’. Thing is… Churchill was a proud Zionist and a key architect of several British imperial genocides. So while it is a bit naughty to spray that stuff on his statue… what was said isn’t technically inaccurate. The graffiti also said ‘free Palestine’, which doubtless added to the right-wing meltdown.

Met Police said a man was arrested at the scene at 4am on 27 February. It’s striking that he was detained for “racially aggravated criminal damage”:

Proud Zionist

Churchill was a racist, Zionist and imperialist to his core. In fact to be fair to him he never said he wasn’t. He held these views proudly and loudly. The only people who have an issue with this basic fact are his weird cultists. Who, perversely, are often also racists.

Left-wing writer Tariq Ali wrote a (bloody good) book about the cult of Churchill and the reality of the man’s views. He told Current Affairs in May 2022:

He was a supporter of the Spanish fascist dictator Francisco Franco. He supported Franco like Hitler and Mussolini did in the Spanish Civil War.

Churchill was also “a terribly open admirer” of Italian fascist leader Benito Mussolini:

Advertisement

He said, what a great role Mussolini was playing in Italy. [“I could not help being charmed by his gentle, simple bearing,” Churchill said of Mussolini.

Then we have the 1943 Bengal famine, which may have killed 3mn people. A British-manufactured horror which:

Churchill refused, explicitly, to intervene to stop that famine.

And don’t forget Churchill’s 1944 crushing of the Greek resistance in favour of fascism:

the order given to the British commander, who the resistance had allowed to enter Athens, that if the resistance doesn’t do as we say, treat Athens as a colonial city. And the bloodbath that occurred in Greece as General Scobie tried to crush the Greek resistance.

Churchill’s views, as you can imagine, on Palestine flow quite naturally from these.

Churchill and Israel

Churchill, like so many imperialists in his day and ours, was both a supporter of Zionism AND an antisemite.

Advertisement

He supported the Balfour Declaration (the colonialist Middle East carve-up which helped get us where we are today) as British colonial secretary:

 I am in full sympathy with the historical traditional aspirations of the Jews.

And said:

Jerusalem must be the only ultimate goal. When it will be achieved it is vain to prophesy; but that it will some day be achieved is one of the few certainties of the future.

Yet he wrote in 1940 that Jews

have been partly responsible for the antagonism from which they suffer.

And that:

Advertisement

there are times when one feels instinctively that all this is only another manifestation of the difference, the separateness of the Jew.

Of the Palestinians and their claim on their homeland, he had absolute contempt:

I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time.

He also denied that:

a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the Black people of Australia.

Churchill said such people had just been replaced with “a higher grade race.”

Nice bloke…

Advertisement

Now vandalising public monuments these days is going to get you in trouble — whether the politics are agreeable or not. In this case it seems to have been Dutch pro-Palestine activists. But if we’re talking about the graffiti itself, the claims made aren’t inaccurate. So maybe it’s time butthurt Churchill fans stop pretending and own their hero’s legacy as a racist and bigot.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Published

on

Pakistan declares ‘open war’ as fighting with Afghanistan rages

Fighting on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border has intensified. One Pakistani minister has described it as a state of “open war”. And Pakistan has hit the Afghan capital Kabul with airstrikes.

Afghan forces launched attacks across the British-created Durand line on 26 February. And Pakistan has called the Taliban regime — which replaced the US-led occupation in 2021 — illegitimate and accused it of harbouring militants.

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on 27 February:

Afghan soil is not being used; but, the Afghan Taliban regime is fully aligned with these terrorists and is completely backing these terrorists.

Al Jazeera reported on 27 February:

Advertisement

Pakistan launched air strikes on Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, as well as on Kandahar and Paktia, early on Friday. The attacks targeted Taliban military installations as Islamabad declared “open war” on the group’s government, in the most serious military confrontation between the two neighbours in years.

One Kabul resident described her terror:

Then we heard gunfire. When we looked out of our apartment window, we saw bullet-like flames going up in the sky.

Al Jazeera said the airstrikes:

came hours after Afghan forces launched coordinated cross-border attacks on Pakistani military positions in six border provinces late on Thursday. Kabul claimed 55 Pakistani soldiers were killed and 19 outposts captured.

Border war

Border fighting broke out in October 2025. A subsequent Turkey and Qatar-brokered ceasefire has now broken down.

The origins of the fighting are complicated. Ahram Online reported:

Advertisement

Islamabad argues that the authorities in Kabul, led by the Taliban, have failed to curb the activities of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, a separate but ideologically aligned group that has intensified attacks inside Pakistan since 2021.

The Taliban deny this is the case. Kabul-based political analyst Obaidullah Baheer said:

Pakistan claimed that it was doing that in response to TTP attacks based on the bogus claim that the Taliban are supporting the TTP, an insurgent group operating within Pakistan.

Drop Site News posted a timeline of the breakdown in diplomatic relations since January 2026:

The Pakistan has also banned personal drones after Afghan forces used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in their attack:

The ban is effective nationwide immediately and will remain in place until further directives are issued. All provincial governments and chief secretaries have been asked to ensure strict enforcement of the directive.

Vast US arsenal

A vast arsenal of US military equipment and weaponry was left behind in 2021. Those weapons are now fuelling the war. As the Canary reported on 4 February:

those weapons have flooded neighbouring Pakistan

The Foundation for Economic Education broke down some of the numbers involved. They said the giant arsenal included:

Advertisement

includes up to 22,174 Humvee vehicles, nearly 1,000 armored vehicles, 64,363 machine guns, and 42,000 pick-up trucks and SUVs.

There were mind-boggling amounts of small arms — and even artillery:

the list of allegedly abandoned weaponry includes up to 358,530 assault rifles, 126,295 pistols, and nearly 200 artillery units.

CNN reported that the border region holds vast quantities of copper and other minerals and metals which the US craves:

Pakistan says there is much more wealth beneath its soil –– an estimated $8 trillion in copper, lithium, cobalt, gold, antimony and other critical minerals.

This reality has:

oiled an unlikely friendship with US President Donald Trump, who has put mineral acquisition at the heart of US foreign policy

Pakistan and Afghanistan’s colonial underpinnings

The colonial nature of the conflict zone can’t be ignored either. National Geographic describes the Durand Line as:

Advertisement

part of a long history of colonizing countries establishing borders that serve their own political purposes while ignoring the cultures and ethnicities of the people living there.

As Ahram Online explained:

The roots of the crisis trace back to 1893, when British diplomat Sir Mortimer Durand signed an agreement with Afghan ruler Abdur Rahman Khan to demarcate a frontier between British India and Afghanistan. That line split Pashtun tribal lands between two political entities.

After independence in 1947, Pakistan:

inherited the Durand Line as an international boundary under the principle of state succession. Successive Afghan governments, however, avoided formally recognizing it as a permanent border. The dispute has simmered for decades, occasionally flaring but rarely disappearing.

The neighbours view the border very differently:

Pakistan views the border as legally settled and central to its territorial integrity. Afghanistan’s position has historically been more ambiguous, shaped by ethnic ties, nationalist sentiment, and resistance to what many Afghans see as a colonial imposition.

This explosive combination of competing territorial visions and competition for vast mineral resources is compounded by colonial history and the presence on both sides of the border of vast arsenals of lost American weapons. And ordinary people of the region aren’t without agency, yet to some degree they remain hostage to imperialisms both old and new.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

Published

on

Brit Awards 2026: What Geese Star Max Bassin Said In His Censored Speech

It’s fair to say that the censors had plenty to keep them busy during this year’s Brit Awards.

Saturday night’s Brits broadcast saw the sound being pulled on numerous occasions due to a variety of comments that were made over the course of the event.

One such moment came during musician Max Bassin’s acceptance speech, after he accepted the International Group Of The Year prize on behalf of his band Geese.

Choosing to keep things short, he began his speech by stating simply: “What’s up, ‘the Brits’? I just want to say, free Palestine…”

Advertisement

However, after Max said the word “free”, the audio was pulled, resulting in the rest of what he had to say being cut from broadcast.

It later emerged that Max concluded his speech: “Fuck ICE, go Geese.”

Many Brits viewers were quick to voice their upset at what appeared to be ITV censoring Max’s politically-charged speech right as the drummer was about to speak out in solidarity with Palestine.

ITV bleeped out Geese’s speech saying Free Palestine😒😒

— James (@jamesIipa) February 28, 2026

Advertisement

seeing ITV censor Geese saying free Palestine in real time feels so gross and dystopian

— brodie / knox (@brodiecantskate) February 28, 2026

itv muting geese saying “free palestine” embarrassing !!

— paige (@SSN0WGL0BE) February 28, 2026

itv blanking out geese saying free palestine im sooo tired of the censorship in this wretched country my god

— bec ☄️ (@lokiislit) February 28, 2026

However, in response to this backlash, the broadcaster has indicated to HuffPost UK that Max’s speech was censored due to his language after his pro-Palestine message – in other words, his use of the word “fuck” – rather than because of his political statements.

Advertisement

Earlier in the night, the Brits also pulled the sound when Jack Whitehall made a seemingly unscripted joke about Peter Mandelson, after spotting Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Labour minister Lisa Nandy in the awards show’s audience.

“I wonder who else is here,” he quipped. “I think I saw Peter Mandelson on the list. Oh wait, that was another list…”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US citizens’ support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Published

on

US citizens' support for Israel plummets, new data confirms

Israel’s Gaza genocide and constant demands for money and military support have caused its popularity to nosedive among US citizens. A new Gallup poll shows a dramatic about-turn in the colony’s standing across the board, especially among Democrats and unaligned voters, but reaching even to the Republican party.

The change is even more dramatic considering how stubbornly Americans held onto their support for Israel through decades of its abuses and slaughter of Palestinians. Almost two and a half years of ongoing genocide have finally shifted things in a healthier direction and the change has Israel and its lobby flailing.

Before 7 October 2023, more than half of Americans favoured Israel over Palestine, while less than a third felt the opposite. Now, 41% say their sympathies are with the Palestinians and support for Israel is barely over a third:

US support for Israel plummets

The fall has been accelerating. In May 2025, Gallup found that support for Israel among Americans was 46%, a figure that was already significantly down. Since then, Israel has lost almost a quarter of the support it still had at that point.

Advertisement

However, Gallup’s data show that the change was already underway before the 7 October 2023 raid into southern Israel, though it accelerated markedly after that. This is almost certainly indicative of the US right’s growing dissatisfaction with what it perceives as an “Israel first” approach of US government and many politicians. Even the late right-wing icon Charlie Kirk had disavowed his support for the colony and rejected its money before he was publicly murdered in September 2025, though the Israel lobby moved quickly to try to hide it after his death.

The fall has been sharpest among registered supporters of the US Democratic party. Ten years ago, half of Democrats supported Israel; now, that has fallen to just 17%:

In a sane world, or even a genuine democracy, such a shift in support would have a profound effect on US foreign policy. That the US continues to pursue war on Israel’s behalf — with Democrat lawmakers scarcely less supportive than Republicans — shows just how diseased, bought and corrupted US politics is under the Israel lobby, like its counterpart in the UK.

Featured image via the author

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025