Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Torygraph’s naff made-up Polanski letter deserves a lawsuit

Published

on

Telegraph

Telegraph

The Telegraph‘s desperation to attack Polanski has plumbed new depths — complete fiction. Apparently, the ‘boob-whisperer’ smears, false allegations about the Red Cross and lies about Polanski’s council tax aren’t cutting through. (The dock fees where he moored his boat were supposed to cover it and only one person moored there had been asked for council tax in 35 years). So the paper — adding ‘news’ would be excessively generous — has made up a letter it presents as being from Polanski. It isn’t, but this is only stated right at the end of the dross, marked by an asterisk.

Astonishingly, the hack who made up the drivel was prepared to put his name to it: Guy Kelly. Kelly’s ‘journalistic’ reputation is forever ruined, but no doubt he’s been rewarded quite handsomely by his new, Israel-fanatic bosses.

Drivel

But oh, what drivel it is. Kelly’s self-description says he’s been “attempting to be funny for the Telegraph for over a decade”. Attempting is the heavy-lifting word in that sentence, very very clearly. The only achievement of any note in the article is that Kelly manages to completely make things up without demonstrating any evidence of even an acquaintance with humour. That’s quite a trick. ‘Funny-brackets-attempted’ in this case means falsely claiming Polanski said he used to:

  • be Formula One champion
  • be part of the unit that killed Osama Binladen
  • blow bubbles into spirit levels

And that’s basically it, apart from signing off as if Polanski thinks he used to be an admiral. It’s not even Terry and June-level (un)funny.

The rag’s new owners have said that anyone who isn’t prepared to show fealty to Israel should leave. And the Israel lobby is desperate to smear Polanski. But maybe there’s a hint in Kelly’s pre-takeover output that he hasn’t had to be dragged too hard into a position to keep his job.

Advertisement

Telegraph — Pleasing the new boss

In September 2025, before the paper was bought by the ultra-Zionist Springer dynasty, the Telegraph’s Kelly was already penning a puff piece about Jonathan Hall. Hall is Starmer’s ‘Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation’. Unsurprisingly, Hall supports the Starmer regime’s war on anti-genocide protest. Even less surprisingly when he has gushed about having “dear family members” in Israel’s occupation military.

The piece implies that criticism of Hall’s pro-Israel position and his support for an unlawful attack on UK rights is because Russia doesn’t like him. Not because of aiding and abetting genocide, oh no. It’s all Putin and those nasty Russians. Even that’s a better standard of invention than the Polanski piece, mind.

But while Kelly might think, unbelievable though that is, that he’s just trying to be ‘funny’ in his smear on the Green leader, others don’t. Like historian @thelefttake, for example, who has urged Polanski to sue:

She and others pointed out that the asterisk-hidden confession that the article is a lie, buried right at the bottom of the piece, won’t be picked up by AI bots. But the false claims will — and will be regurgitated to users as if it were true:

Others pointed out how reminiscent the attacks on Polanski are of the media war on Jeremy Corbyn when he was Labour leader:

A lesson from the past

The level of desperation is obvious. But the nonsensical made-up smears — including the ‘Labour antisemitism’ scam ultimately brought Corbyn down. Corbyn’s over-willingness to apologise and his reluctance to hit the liars with legal action empowered the smears. Polanski has shown signs of the same tendency — and he needs to stop.

Tellingly, the one smear that never went far — and in fact worked in Corbyn’s favour — was the one in which he took prompt legal action.

In 2018, then-Tory MP Ben Bradley claimed that Corbyn had been a spy for Communist Czechoslovakia. Corbyn set the lawyers on the Tory smearer. The frit Bradley eventually forked out cash to one of Corbyn’s favourite charities and pay Corbyn’s legal costs to avoid a court case. But most memorably, he had to not only post a grovelling apology on Twitter for his “false and untrue” defamation. He also had to include a request to everyone who read it to also “Please retweet”.

Advertisement
Ben Bradley’s viral 2018 tweet.

The humiliation went hugely viral, penetrated the public’s consciousness and set Corbyn’s smearers back significantly.

Now that was funny. Polanski should sue. Not only for his own benefit but for the sake of a country that desperately needs a resurgent left with a leader who hits back at the smear tactics of the morally and politically bankrupt.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

A Dangerous First-Of-Its-Kind Bill

Published

on

A Dangerous First-Of-Its-Kind Bill

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”19d0fe1c-5975-4ec4-820b-204959c68e13″}).render(“6a04a3b7e4b0cdaf88dcb201”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Eurovision Bosses Are Closely Watching Voting After Past Israel Concerns

Published

on

Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals

Eurovision’s director has said the event’s organisers are keeping a close eye on this year’s voting, after questions were raised about the 2025 Israeli delegation.

At last year’s Eurovision final, Israeli performer Yuval Raphael finished in second place overall, having come first among televoters.

Once the competition was over, several competing broadcasters voiced concerns about whether the voting system that was then in place, allowing viewers to vote for the same country as many as 20 times, “encouraged manipulation”.

Many competing countries also took issue with the fact that Israel’s government had paid for cross-platform advertising, encouraging international viewers to vote for its representative during last year’s final.

Advertisement

Ahead of this year’s event, major changes were made to the voting system, reducing the number of permitted votes from 20 to just 10, as well as introducing “enhanced technical safeguards” that would “detect and block coordinated or fraudulent voting activity”.

“Stronger limits on promotion” were also implemented to “curb disproportionate third-party influence, including government-backed campaigns”.

Over the weekend, it was revealed that Israel’s broadcaster had already been issued with a formal warning over a promotional video urging viewers to vote 10 times for the 2026 Israeli representative, Noam Bettan.

During a new interview with BBC News, Eurovision’s director Martin Green conceded that “some of the promotion by some of the broadcasters was a little disproportionate” last year, claiming that those who flout the newly-implemented rules would be subject to “further scrutiny”.

Advertisement
Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals
Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals

Jessica Gow/TT/Shutterstock

He also insisted we’re a “long way from” Israel’s representative being disqualified over any further breaches and that his team was overseeing this year’s voting “very, very carefully”.

“If there is a problem, we start a conversation and we try and resolve it amicably, without reaching for sanctions,” Green added.

“We hope, in a way, that you teach the world that you can solve [conflict] by being collegiate right now.”

Last week, a Eurovision spokesperson said: “On Friday 8 May it was brought to our attention that videos with an on-screen instruction to ‘vote 10 times for Israel’ had been published and released by the artist representing [Israel’s national broadcaster Kan].

Advertisement

“Within 20 minutes we had contacted the Kan delegation to ask them to immediately stop any distribution of the videos and remove them from any platforms where they had been published. They immediately acted to do this.”

A spokesperson for Kan subsequently told The Times Of Israel that they were “following all of the rules of the competition”.

Eurovision's 2026 representative Noam Bettan pictured over the weekend
Eurovision’s 2026 representative Noam Bettan pictured over the weekend

“The voting instructions of the Eurovision Song Contest that cover promotion are predominantly directed at discouraging large scale funded third-party campaigns, and we are satisfied that this video did not form part of such a campaign,” Eurovision’s spokesperson continued.

However, employing a direct call to action to vote 10 times for one artist or song is also not in line with our rules nor the spirit of the competition. The scale of our vote means that such activity cannot affect the overall result and 50% of all votes this year are supplied through professional juries.”

On Tuesday evening, Israel’s representative made it through the semi-final stage of the contest, and is due to perform again at the Eurovision final on Saturday night.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Two Doors Down Season 8 Confirmed By The BBC

Published

on

Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down

Two Doors Down is set to return for an eighth full-length season, three years on from the death of its co-creator Simon Carlyle.

Centring around a group of neighbours in the suburbs of Glasgow, Two Doors Down began airing in 2016, and was created by writing duo Simon Carlyle and Gregor Sharp.

On Wednesday evening, the BBC announced that the sitcom will be back for a new run of episodes, which will reunite the entire cast.

Advertisement

In a statement, Gregor Sharp said: “It was a lot of fun putting the band back together for the Christmas episode last year, so I’m really excited to be coming back with some new tunes, which we hope will turn out just as special.

“The cast are the most talented group of performers you could wish for, and I can’t wait to get started.”

Fans can look forward to appearances from all of Two Doors Down’s main cast in the new episodes, including Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan, Elaine C Smith, Jonathan Watson and Alex Norton.

Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down
Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down

A synopsis for the new season teases: “Series eight picks up exactly where the 2025 Christmas special left us. Beth and Eric are still clinging to the hope of a quiet life, but their best efforts are no match for the relentless chaos supplied by neighbours Colin, Cathy and Christine.

“Meanwhile, Michelle is preparing for the new arrival, while Gordon throws himself into further education. Alan and Ian return too, doing their level best to support their partners – with mixed results.”

Advertisement

Before that, though, the cast will also be performing a string of live shows at Glasgow’s Hydro Arena over the course of September and October.

The first seven seasons of Two Doors Down are now streaming on BBC iPlayer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Fifa World Cup Halftime Show To Feature Madonna, BTS And More

Published

on

Madonna on stage at Coachella last month

Even the biggest football-sceptics among us now have a reason to get excited about the upcoming World Cup.

The global tournament is due to take place across the United States, Canada and Mexico this summer, and will culminate in a final featuring a Super Bowl-esque Halftime Show, the first in Fifa’s history.

And just wait until you check out the line-up.

K-pop sensations BTS, chart-topping superstar Shakira and the Queen of Pop herself, Madonna, were all unveiled as co-headliners of the World Cup Halftime Show on Thursday morning.

Advertisement
Madonna on stage at Coachella last month
Madonna on stage at Coachella last month

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Coa

The show is curated by Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, and was announced in a social media post featuring characters from both The Muppets and Sesame Street (the first time the two former Jim Henson Company characters have shared the screen in decades, since the latter was bought by Disney in the early 2000s).

Watch the extremely cute video for yourself below:

In the lead-up to the announcement, Shakira teased last week that she had a new song to coincide with the World Cup, following the huge success of 2010’s Waka Waka (This Time For Africa).

The new track, Dai Dai, will serve as the official anthem of the World Cup, and will seemingly feature the singer Burna Boy.

Advertisement

Shakira previously co-headlined the Super Bowl Halftime Show in 2020, where she shared the stage with Jennifer Lopez.

Fellow headliner Madonna is also a former Super Bowl performer, setting a new record for viewing figures with her halftime set in 2012 (though this record has since been bested by several other Super Bowl headliners).

The 2026 World Cup final is due to take place on Sunday 19 July.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nicki Minaj Weighs In On Kemi Badenoch In The Commons

Published

on

Nicki Minaj Weighs In On Kemi Badenoch In The Commons

Kemi Badenoch has just won over the support of none other than the controversial American rapper Nicki Minaj for her performance in the House of Commons.

The Conservative leader has been widely praised by Keir Starmer’s critics for demolishing the prime minister over ongoing speculation he could be ousted from office on Wednesday.

Speaking shortly after the King’s Speech – where the monarch lays out the government’s legislative plans for the upcoming parliamentary session – the leader of the opposition also took aim at health secretary Wes Streeting’s ambitions for office.

One particular clip of her attacks exceeded 1.8 million views.

Advertisement

In the viral video, Badenoch said: “Scrapping NHS England, something the prime minister announced 14 months ago – but I suppose the health secretary has been a it distracted lately hasn’t he?”

Looking straight at Streeting on the front bench, she said: “He’s chuntering now, why don’t you just do your job? Do your job!”

Badenoch added: “There’s no point him giving me dirty looks, we all know what he has been up to. We all know.”

Evidently that video made it across the pond as Minaj shared it on X, commenting: “The UK is truly one of a kind. They will portray her [Badenoch] in film & TV one day…just like they did with Margaret Thatcher.”

Advertisement

The rapper has drifted into right-wing politics over the last year and even met up with Donald Trump at the White House in February, describing herself as the US president’s “no.1 fan”.

Badenoch has also attracted the support of another divisive American rapper, Azealia Banks, since becoming Conservative leader.

In April, Banks wrote on social media: “Kemi Badenoch is fucking iconic. World leaders will respect her Professionalism alot more than goofball Nigel.

“Plus she’s not a Punk. Shes not running her mouthy and talking shit because she will really go to war with Putin and win.”

Advertisement

😩 The UK is truly one of a kind.

They will portray her in film & TV one day…just like they did with
Margaret Thatcher. https://t.co/T7E1gVsbUa

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) May 13, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

This Is What Teenagers Say Is Worrying Them The Most

Published

on

'Air Traffic Controller Parenting' Could Help Build Teen Resilience

I often think about how tough it must be to be a teenager right now. Between the pressures of school life and the inability to get away from it all thanks to the 24/7 nature of social media, it sounds pretty exhausting.

But what is it actually like? And what’s keeping the nation’s teenagers up at night? A 2025 survey by BBC Radio 5 Live and BBC Bitesize shed some light.

The online poll of 2,000 kids aged 13-18 explored the issues shaping teenagers’ lives – from mental health and safety to the rise of AI.

What is the biggest worry for teens?

Advertisement

Getting kids to open up about what’s worrying them can be like drawing blood from a stone for plenty of parents. But the survey offered some insights into what teens worry about most.

Over two-thirds (69%) of all participants reported feeling anxious at least some of the time, with pressure around exams and grades being the biggest worry.

Its survey of 1,000 15- to 18-year-olds taking GCSE or A-Levels found 63% said it was hard to cope in the lead-up to, and during, these exams. Of these, 13% had suicidal thoughts and 13% self-harmed. More than half (56%) had trouble sleeping.

Among those struggling, 61% experienced anxiety and 40% worsening mental health, while 30% skipped meals and one in four (26%) had panic attacks.

Advertisement

The research also found exams were more than twice as likely to have a significant negative impact on mental health than social media.

May – which is when school exam season starts for most – is the peak season for children to call Childline about exam stress. Between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026; the free, confidential service for kids delivered 1,679 counselling sessions where exam or revision stress was mentioned.

The majority of concerns about exam stress were from children aged 12-18 years old, however younger students are also impacted, with 11% of contacts coming from children aged 11 and under.

One young person, aged 16, said: “If I’m not revising for exams, I feel this panic in my chest, but the panic also stops me focusing on the revision when I try and do it.”

Advertisement

Another 16-year-old girl said they have plans for their future, but have completely lost motivation to revise. “I have no idea why, my friends are trying to help get me back on track but I’m so overwhelmed,” they said.

What else did the BBC’s teen survey find?

It found 65% of teens feel overwhelmed at least some of the time and almost three-quarters (74%) of girls feel anxious at least some of the time.

Another eye-opening finding was just how much time teens are spending on their phones: more than a third (38%) spend five hours or more a day, while one in 20 spend eight hours or more.

Advertisement

When they are online, more than half reported having seen sexist and racist content. Two in five (44%) said they have seen extremely violent content.

In real life, 44% worry about knife crime in their local area and almost one third (30%) of teenage girls have experienced sexual harassment in school.

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular among the younger generation, with almost half (47%) using it to help with homework or coursework.

This is rising year-on-year – the figure was 36% in 2024 and 29% in 2023.

Advertisement

Despite the challenges teens face today, nearly eight in 10 (79%) are feeling positive about their future.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jet2 Power Bank Rules 2026: Why Your Portable Charger Is Banned Without A Clear Wh Rating

Published

on

Jet2 Power Bank Rules 2026: Why Your Portable Charger Is Banned Without A Clear Wh Rating

Passengers hoping to bring their “smart bags”, which have chargers in them, might be disappointed: those “with non-removable batteries above 2.7Wh are not permitted onboard,” sites like Ryanair advise.

That’s because they contain lithium batteries, which power banks also have.

These can sometimes short-circuit and are generally not permitted in the hold as they can catch fire.

And on their site, Jet2 said that they ban “lithium-ion batteries, lithium metal batteries and power banks that don’t clearly state” an important rating.

Advertisement

Power banks need to show their watt/hour rating

Those that don’t include the “watt-hour rating or lithium metal content, or where the watt-hour rating cannot easily be otherwise ascertained, are forbidden”.

A watt-hour rating is usually shortened to Wh. Power banks should have a rating “not exceeding 160Wh, providing they are individually protected against short circuit”, Jet2 said.

What if my power bank doesn’t have a Wh rating?

Advertisement

This doesn’t need to be on the power bank explicitly, as you can work it out from the milliampere-hour (mAh), ampere-hour (Ah), and/or nominal voltage (V).

Once you find these, the UK Civil Aviation Authority said: “You can arrive at the number of watt-hours your battery provides if you know the battery’s nominal voltage (V) and capacity in ampere-hours (Ah) using this calculation ― Ah x V = Wh.

“If only the milliampere hours (mAh) are marked on the battery, then divide that number by 1000 to get ampere-hours (Ah). For example, 4400 mAh / 1000 = 4.4 Ah.”

If none of these is available, though, your power bank might not pass muster.

Advertisement

Don’t bring more than two power banks with you, either

Those are only some of the rules the airline enforces.

  • No more than two power banks per passenger,
  • Power banks should not exceed 160Wh,
  • Power banks can’t be charged whilst onboard the aircraft,
  • Power banks can’t be used on-flight,
  • Power banks have to be carried on-board in hand luggage and placed under your seat,
  • Power banks must not be used to charge or power any portable electronic devices during taxi, take off, and landing.

Jet2 is not the only airline to have some or all of these rules, so check with your airline before flying.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Which Garden ‘Weeds’ Do You Actually Need To Remove?

Published

on

Which Garden 'Weeds' Do You Actually Need To Remove?

We’re all about biodiverse gardens here at HuffPost UK, and no-mow May is a great time to rewild your backyard.

But sometimes, as is the case with invasive Japanese knotweed (which can cause structural damage to your home if not treated ASAP), certain plants are better off out of your yard.

So, we thought we’d ask the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)’s chief horticulturalist, Guy Barter, about which ones you should banish on sight (and others you should keep a careful eye on, as well as the ones you should bear with).

1) Plants not to let grow in the first place

Advertisement

“Some alliums, such as:

  • three-cornered garlic, and
  • crow garlic

are extraordinarily tricky to winkle out as they leave little bulbils behind when uprooted,” the gardening expert told us.

“Never let them gain a lodgement in the first place, ideally.”

Three-cornered garlic (AKA three-cornered leek) is an invasive species that can smother native wildflowers. It’s an offence to cause it to grow in the wild, and it can be removed by hand-weeding the bulbs.

Crow garlic, meanwhile, spreads very easily and can take over your garden if you’re not careful. Fork out seedlings or smother plants with e.g. cardboard and bark.

Advertisement

2) Plants to stop in their tracks

“In general, gardeners would be unwise to leave invasive weeds such as:

  • bindweed,
  • ground elder, and
  • couch grass

to their own devices,” Barter told us.

“Not only are they very invasive, but [they] are [also] hard to dislodge.”

Bindweed, while sometimes beneficial for wildlife, can be very hard to remove from your garden due to its enormous and rapidly spreading roots. It can be controlled by placing physical barriers at least 45cm into the ground, deadheading flowers, smothering young plants, mowing often, and forking out seedlings.

Advertisement

Ground elder can lead to a “carpet of leaves”. Fork out plants, smother them, place a barrier 45cm or more deep around them, mow more, and pull off new growth.

And couch grass, which can spread like wildfire, can be forked out or smothered.

3) Plants to keep a close eye on

“Many garden plants are very ‘willing’ and although valuable in places where other plants won’t grow, can run amok in fertile, sunny, moist soil,” Barter said.

Advertisement
  • Solidago,
  • certain bamboos,
  • montbretia,
  • mind-your-own-business [Soleirolia soleirolii],
  • borage,
  • horseradish, and
  • mint

“Come to mind,” he added.

That’s not to say they need to be removed, though.

“Constant vigilance and an occasional going round with a spade ensure these plants stay in [their] lane. Repeat transgressors must go, however.”

4) Plants to let grow, despite being a bit of a pain

Slightly annoying plants can still be worth it, considering how useful they are to your garden’s ecosystem.

Advertisement

“Some unwanted plants like:

  • nettles,
  • green alkanet,
  • thistles,
  • sow thistles, and
  • hedge mustard,

although apt to spread, can be given a little slack in view of their value to insects.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Why are US CEOs lining up meet what they called the funder of the largest state sponsor of terrorism?

Published

on

China

China

Just about ten days ago, the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News that China was buying 90% of ​Iran’s energy, “so they are funding the largest state sponsor of terrorism.”

Bessent may have got the country wrong, as it has been the USA that is the destabilising power in the world. So if anyone is funding war and destruction, it is the USA.

Just this year, it has assassinated sovereign state leaders, kidnapped a head of state, started an illegal war against Iran, increased the stranglehold of Cuba, killed civilians in acts of perfidy in the Caribbean sea, armed Israel to kill innocents in Lebanon, and continued its genocide in Palestine.

Today, Bessent, along with Trump and a dozen American CEOs, is in China for bilateral talks.

Advertisement

The United States is perfectly willing to lecture Beijing on terrorism while dispatching its corporate elite to cut deals and chase market access.

Highly awkward and unusual situation

Biden, in his two terms, did not visit China. The last visit to China by a US head of state was by Trump, nine years ago.

Presumably, the China hawks in the US, like Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton, who are unable to distinguish between Singapore and China, would have criticised Biden too much, so he avoided it.

Cotton’s clip on not knowing the difference between two Asian countries went viral, and he was still posting about menacing “Communist China” filling his beloved America with dangerous products while his MAGA hero was in there.

Advertisement

The cultish MAGA does indeed allow Trump to get away with anything.

Advertisement

Even the hawkish Washington think tanks are trying to sell this self-confessed “highly awkward” visit.

Rush Doshi of the US think tank Council on Foreign Relations:

This meeting is coming at an unusual time. It’s coming at a time when there is a detente right now between the U.S. and China, an uneasy kind of equilibrium. But in the backdrop is Iran. The very fact that a U.S. president is going to China while he’s also having his military blockade Chinese ships in the Strait of Hormuz is a highly awkward and unusual situation.

Doshi said that while Trump was bringing a smaller “but very impressive” delegation of about a dozen CEOs to China, including Elon Musk, Wall Street financial heads, Boeing, and Qualcomm, representing a diverse range of industries, which is a smaller group than the 40 CEOs he took to the Gulf in 2025. 

China — CEOs galore

So why are the CEOs there? The answer is simple — whether the US likes it or not, China is a resolute competitor and trading partner. They are there to “unlock regulatory approvals, market access, and investment opportunities.”

Advertisement

Musk is there because China is weighing curbs on exports of solar manufacturing equipment to the United States, which could threaten plans by Tesla to build new factories or expand existing ones to boost local production, according to Reuters.

Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Reuters last month that the US plane maker was counting on the Trump administration to help unlock a long-awaited major order from China 500 737 Max jets.

Cargill is there because the US wants China to increase its purchases of agriculture from the United States, according to Bloomberg.

Meta is there seemingly because China recently blocked Meta’s $2 billion acquisition of Chinese-founded AI startup Manus, Bloomberg implies.

Advertisement

Washington has previously restricted sales of advanced semiconductors primarily from Nvidia to China in an effort to limit the country’s AI development. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang was reportedly added late to Trump’s delegation to China. The USA took some of these restrictions away in January, but China has refused to buy any so far.

War on Iran

If the USA is looking for subservience from China, like it commands from the UAE, Israel, or the UK, this is unlikely.

China’s South China Morning Post reported that a Chinese company that tracked US bombers over Iran, despite sanctions, wears sanctions with pride. The report said:

Advertisement
Chinese satellite imagery firm MizarVision, which rose to fame with its analysis of American military deployments in the US-Israel war on Iran, is treating its addition to the US sanctions list as a badge of honour in its hiring campaign.

Looks like Trump and Bessent are stuck with doing business with the “funders of state-sponsored terrorism.”

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cabinet Members Prepare To Oppose Keir Starmers Leadership

Published

on

Cabinet Members Prepare To Oppose Keir Starmers Leadership

Cabinet members are preparing to tell Keir Starmer later today that he must announce a timetable for his departure from Downing Street, HuffPost UK has been told.

Senior ministers will personally confront the prime minister within hours to say that he has got to go.

One Labour source said two-thirds of the cabinet are now opposed to him continuing as PM.

Some MPs who signed a so-called “loyalty letter” backing Starmer earlier this week are also now telling colleagues he has to stand down, it is claimed.

Advertisement

It comes amid confusion over whether or not health secretary Wes Streeting – who held showdown talks with Starmer yesterday – will announce his own leadership campaign.

Two members of his team told HuffPost UK that he does not currently have the support of the 81 MPs he needs to formally mount a challenge.

One ally said he did have more than the number required at one point, but that some of them have now peeled off.

A supporter said: “Wes has got the numbers, but things are shifting.”

Advertisement

An MP who is backing Streeting said: “I’m confident that Wes has got the numbers.

“Two-thirds of the cabinet have expressed privately that Keir can’t continue and were expecting them to go in to see him later today and tell him that he’s got to set out a timetable to go.

There is increasing hope that he will realise that his time is up.”

But an ally of the prime minister, who has insisted he will fight any attempt to unseat him, insisted nothing had changed.

Advertisement

“The Labour Party rules are clear – if anyone has the numbers they can go to the party and say they want to challenge the leader,” the ally said. “That hasn’t happened.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025