Connect with us

Politics

Voting rights under threat from Republicans

Published

on

Voting rights under threat from Republicans

The US House of Representatives has passed a bill requiring proof of US citizenship for anyone voting in the midterm elections.

The House – controlled by the Republicans, took the vote on 11 February 2026 ahead of the midterms in November.

The bill passed 218-213 to approve the SAVE America Act. Only one Democrat switched sides and backed the Republican bill.

The legislation will now move forward to the also Republican-led Senate. According to Reuters:

Advertisement

it is expected to receive a vote but unlikely to garner the 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority needed for passage.

Democrats said the bill will impose unnecessary burdens on American voters. Additionally, it will give Donald Trump even more electoral power.

Bullshit erosion of voting rights

The legislation first emerged during the 2024 presidential election campaign. It was driven by Trump’s false claims that large numbers of people who were in the country ‘illegally’ had been voting in federal elections.

But let’s not forget, you can’t be illegal on stolen land.

A similar version of the bill passed the House twice – last April and in 2024. However, it died both times once it reached the Senate.

Advertisement

This vote came only a week after Trump called for Republicans to “nationalize” elections.

Along with requiring proof of citizenship to vote, it would also criminalise election officials who register anyone without the proper documentation.

Republicans also added a photo ID requirement for both in-person and mail-in voting.

However, it is already illegal for non US citizens to vote in federal elections. Additionally, the Center for Election Innovation and Research found that illegal voting is extremely rare.

Advertisement

It found:

CEIR continues to find that sweeping allegations about noncitizen registrations or voting appear to arise from misunderstandings, mischaracterizations, or outright fabrications about complex voter data. In every examined case, when claims about large numbers of noncitizens on voting rolls are subject to scrutiny and properly investigated, the number of alleged instances falls drastically. When investigations do turn up rare instances of improper registration or voting, officials take swift action to ensure that American elections remain secure.

So basically, it’s just another right-wing nonsense talking point that Republican friends-of-nonces are using to both demonise migrants and shut down what little democracy the US has left.

Erosion of democracy

Democratic Party leaders told Reuters that the bill is an attempt to suppress the vote. It would also undermine their electoral chances at a time when they are favoured to take control of the House.

Recently, the Democrats won a seat in the Texas state Senate, which the Republicans are seeing as a wake-up call as well as a picture of what is to come if Trump’s violent regime continues.

Advertisement

But the new legislation is nothing short of an attempt to erode democracy. Republicans know they are on borrowed time – and there is only so long their murderous, fascist police state can continue.

Republicans are running scared – millions of Americans have woken up since ICE agents murdered both Renee Good and Alex Pretti in cold blood. Now, the Epstein files and the associated cover-up at the highest levels of government mean that Trump and his cronies will go to any length to hold onto power.

Because let’s face it, once they lose that power, they’re all ending up in jail.

Feature image via Reuters/YouTube

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Laura Kuenssberg Confronts Iranian Ambassador Over Protester Killings

Published

on

Laura Kuenssberg Confronts Iranian Ambassador Over Protester Killings

Laura Kuenssberg has confronted a senior Iranian officials over his government’s killing of thousands of protesters.

Up to 36,500 civilians are estimated to have been murdered by the regime following by ordinary people an uprising in January.

On the BBC this morning, Kuenssberg asked Seyed Ali Mousavi, Iran’s ambassador to the UK, how he could justify his government’s brutality towards its own people.

She said: “Since we last spoke, your government has killed thousands of its own people in the streets who had the courage to stand up to protest against the suffering that they have been experiencing at the hands of the regime.

Advertisement

“Thousands of people were killed. How on earth do you justify that, ambassador?”

Ali Mousavi admitted Iran “has our own problems”, which he blamed on western sanctions imposed on the country.

And he insisted all Iranians were now united following the military action launched on the country by America and Israel.

He said: “Our people are in a very painful and sensitive period of time, but they are supporting the government against the foreign invader, the foreign aggressors. If you go inside Iran, you see unity among the people.

Advertisement

But Kuenssberg told him: “Just this morning I looked at some of the images and watched some of the videos from what happened to protesters in your country in January.

“I looked at videos and images, verified by our colleagues at BBC Verify, that show body bags littered over the courtyard of a mortuary, I saw images of young, old, teenagers, people killed by your government – beaten faces, bloodied bodies, gunshot wounds.

“How on earth can you justify that and sit there today saying ‘our people have some complaints’? Your government killed thousands of their own people and the world saw that.”

The ambassador said: “I do not want to say that we do not have any problems. No, there are problems in our country. The way to solve those problems is according to Iranian laws and regulations without any interference from foreign countries against Iran.”

Advertisement

Kuenssberg went on: “This was about your own people taking to the streets to protest against their suffering, and if you had nothing to hide, why turn off the internet during the protests?

“If you had nothing to hide, why not allow people to report freely and fairly?”

Ali Mousavi warned her to “be very delicate regarding the Iranian circumstances and conditions in Iran”.

He added: “Iran is one of the peace-loving countries and I hope that you recommend these kind of activities.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cooper hits back at Blair criticism of PM over war

Published

on

Cooper hits back at Blair criticism of PM over war

The post Cooper hits back at Blair criticism of PM over war appeared first on Conservative Home.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Philp accuses Labour of ‘dereliction of duty’ over warships

Published

on

Philp accuses Labour of 'dereliction of duty' over warships

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Newslinks for Sunday 8th March 2026

Published

on

Newslinks for Friday 30th January 2026

Trump tells Starmer: We don’t need your aircraft carriers

“Donald Trump told Sir Keir Starmer that the United States does not need its “once great ally” Britain to send aircraft carriers to the Middle East. The US president said he “will remember” the lack of British support for his war with Iran in an intervention which risks cementing the collapse of the special relationship. “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” he posted on his Truth Social platform. “That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer – But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!” – Sunday Telegraph

  • Starmer told help not needed even as US uses UK bases for Iran strikes – Observer
  • Special relationship in tatters – Mail on Sunday
  • Trump takes another shot at Starmer – Sun on Sunday
  • UK preparing aircraft carrier for possible Middle East deployment – Observer
  • British strikes on targets in Iran would be lawful, says deputy prime minister – FT
  • Trump says Iran being ‘decimated’ as Gulf states hit with wave of strikes – Observer
  • Trump vague on Iran’s ‘unconditional surrender’ as he refuses to rule out US troop deployment – Observer
  • Flames engulf Iran after devastating US and Israeli strikes against regime’s oil depots – Mail on Sunday
  • Iran in flames after US and Israeli strikes – Sunday Express
  • Cypriots call for Britain to leave military bases – Sunday Telegraph
  • Russian tech found in drone that hit RAF base in Cyprus – Sunday Times
  • Badenoch slams ‘clueless’ idiots mourning death of the Ayatollah – Sun on Sunday
  • Kurds desperate to invade Iran… if they get Trump’s jets – Sunday Telegraph
  • Israel targets Iranian commanders in Beirut hotel strike – Sunday Telegraph
  • Britain must rearm – but Reeves is busy battling the Ministry of Defence – Sunday Telegraph
  • Britain has just two days of gas as Middle East flow runs dry – Sunday Telegraph
Comment

Blair rebukes Starmer for not backing Trump on Iran

“Tony Blair has rebuked Keir Starmer for his lack of support for Donald Trump’s war on Iran, telling the Prime Minister: ‘We should have backed America from the very beginning’. Amid mounting diplomatic tensions between London and Washington over the conflict, Sir Tony warned his successor as Labour leader: ‘If they are your ally and they are an indispensable cornerstone for your security… you had better show up’. The former Prime Minister’s dramatic intervention comes after President Trump described Sir Keir as ‘not Winston Churchill’ for initially denying him permission to launch strikes on Iran from UK territory, including the joint-US base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands.” – Mail on Sunday

  • Starmer’s help too late, says Trump, as Blair joins criticism – Sunday Times

Labour accuses Badenoch of scoring ‘cheap political points’ over Iran strikes

“Labour has accused Kemi Badenoch of scoring “cheap political points” after the Conservative party leader said Keir Starmer was “too scared” to join strikes on Iran. Al Carns, the defence minister, said “serious politics” was required in response to Badenoch’s speech at the party’s spring conference where she criticised the prime minister’s stance on the US-Israel strikes on Iran a week ago. Initially, Starmer did not allow the US to use UK RAF bases for the attack, and did not take part in initial military action against Iran, but then said the RAF would take part in defensive operations. A strike by an Iranian drone hit an aircraft hangar at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus. Badenoch told the Conservative’s spring conference in Harrogate, North Yorkshire: “At a time when Britain needs strong and decisive leadership, we have a prime minister who is too afraid of making the wrong decision, too afraid to make any decision at all.” – Observer

Lammy faces defeat by rebel MPs over jury trial curbs

“David Lammy faces defeat in the Commons over his plans to curb jury trials unless he reverses his position, rebel Labour MPs have warned. Leaders of the rebellion over the Justice Secretary’s plans to scale back jury trials say they already have nearly 80 Labour MPs ready to vote against the Government unless he offers concessions. The Courts and Tribunals Bill, which would enact the changes, is due to go before the Commons for its second reading on Tuesday. Most of the rebel MPs are expected to abstain or offer support on the condition that Mr Lammy accepts compromise amendments to the bill as it progresses through Parliament.” – Sunday Telegraph

Badenoch plans reshuffle ‘to stop rising star Lam defecting to Reform’

“Kemi Badenoch is poised to make a ‘root and branch’ revamp of the Tories’ top team in her first major reshuffle as party leader. In a sign of her growing confidence, Ms Badenoch is understood to be planning to remove ‘dead wood’ opposition Cabinet ministers holding up the party’s renewal. Frontbenchers said to be most at risk include Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride, Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel and Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp. Young MPs will be promoted to energise the battered Tory brand based on ‘social media clicks’. But there are also claims that Ms Badenoch is reshuffling now to stop at least one rising star from defecting to Nigel Farage’s Reform. Party insiders said that she will try to ‘buy off’ Weald of Kent MP Katie Lam with a promotion, as she is now on ‘defection watch’. – Mail on Sunday

Advertisement
  • UK will never be strong with Labour’s ‘political pygmies’ – Sun on Sunday
Other political news and comment
  • Mahmood’s truths must be heard as the soft left calls us all racists – Robert Colvile, Sunday Times
  • Labour poised to raise energy bills to save Britain’s factories – Sunday Telegraph
  • Labour’s VAT raid will kill off cathedral schools, says Armstrong – Sunday Telegraph
  • Labour blunder as MoD posts video of secret facility in Ukraine – Mail on Sunday
  • Veterans charity accused of ‘forcing out tenants’ before Labour’s landlord curbs – Sunday Telegraph
News in Brief

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Opinion Article | Roz Savage: Lib Dems “Need A Plan” For A Coalition

Published

on

Roz Savage: Lib Dems 'Need A Plan' For A Coalition
Roz Savage: Lib Dems 'Need A Plan' For A Coalition

Roz Savage was elected as Lib Dem MP of the new South Cotswolds constituency at the 2024 general election (Alamy)


8 min read

Liberal Democrat MP Roz Savage speaks to Matilda Martin about why she became a record-breaking ocean rower, how the breakdown of her marriage liberated her, and why she would like to see Ed Davey’s party have a strategy for coalition

Advertisement

The idea of standing for Parliament first arose in conversation with environmentalist and then Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith, now a peer, while the pair were working to make the 2012 London Olympics free of plastic bags.

Roz Savage’s instinct was to dismiss it: “That’s an appalling idea. Why would anybody in their right mind want to do that?”

The conversations she went on to have with MPs to test the waters confirmed her suspicions. “I decided there was pretty much nothing about being an MP that I would enjoy. But, like I say, I’m not necessarily optimising for enjoyment,” the Liberal Democrat MP tells The House.

Advertisement

Asking herself whether she made the right decision in becoming an MP would be, she thinks now, a waste of time. She has long prioritised making herself useful over feeling comfortable.

Savage, 58, was a management consultant for almost 11 years before deciding that she had chosen the wrong path. Her epiphany was gradual.

To break a few rules, to do a few things that you shouldn’t do, was very liberating for me

Advertisement

The daughter of two Methodist preachers, she recalls growing up in a family with little money. She believes it was this that led her to buy into Thatcherism and go straight into an office job after she graduated from Oxford with a law degree in 1989.

“For the last six or seven years I was in that job, I wanted to do something that felt more purposeful, to feel like I was making the world a better place in some way.”

Savage sat down and wrote two versions of her own obituary – the one that she wanted and the one that she saw herself heading for. “Writing those two obituaries was the ‘holy crap’ moment of, ‘I’ve been just barking up the wrong tree about what I want to do with my life’.”

Advertisement

Savage’s marriage was breaking down at that time. “Up until that point, I’d been very conventional and even very conformist. I was a good girl and played by the rules, and I know my parents were very disappointed when my marriage ended. But to break a few rules, to do a few things that you shouldn’t do, was very liberating for me.”

This hunger for a change in direction culminated in Savage becoming the first woman to row solo across the world ‘s “Big Three” oceans: the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian. Her first ocean row was across the Atlantic, beginning in November 2005. The trip took 103 days.

Sitting in her Portcullis House office today, Savage reflects that 13 March will be the 20th anniversary of her arrival into Antigua.

Amusingly, Savage declares herself “not really an oceans person”, preferring the mountains and the forest. It was a trip to Peru that first inspired her love of nature. Why, then, did she choose to embark on a solo row across the Atlantic Ocean?

Advertisement

Being able to row is about one per cent of what it takes to row across an ocean

The idea, she recalls, came from a chance meeting with former Tory MP Dan Byles, who had rowed across the Atlantic with his mother in 1995. “When he was telling me about their Atlantic crossing, I just thought, ‘That sounds bloody miserable.’ I couldn’t really see why anybody would want to do it.”

But she tucked the idea away nonetheless and later decided – in the spirit of pushing herself out of her comfort zone – that this would be the perfect project to raise awareness about the environment.

Advertisement

She was not a stranger to the sport, having rowed at Oxford – an experience that was “enough to give me the delusion that this was something I had a chance at succeeding in”.

“But as it turns out, being able to row is about one per cent of what it takes to row across an ocean. It’s much more about seamanship and not going crazy – just not giving up.”

Though Byles advised her to wait, Savage embarked on her voyage across the Atlantic after just 14 months of training.

The row was far from straightforward: Savage had to contend with four broken oars, a broken stereo, broken camping stove, a broken satellite phone and tendonitis in her shoulders. This was also the year, 2005, of Hurricane Katrina and what Savage describes as “the stormiest year ever on the Atlantic”.

Advertisement
Roz Savage rowing
Roz Savage was the first woman to row solo across the Pacific Ocean from the United States to Australia, completing the voyage in three stages between 2008 and 2010 (Alamy)

“At the time, I was just really pissed off. ‘Come on, Mother Nature, I’m out here as your champion and you’re just beating me up every single day!’” But she feels she learned more than she would have done otherwise and says the grumpiness has been traded in for gratitude.

Savage did not raise money for charity for the row: “I felt like the earth didn’t need our money. She needed our respect, so I was just doing it more to get the message out there.” She admits that it is difficult to measure her success in raising awareness but hopes she has added “my few grains of rice” to help tip the scales.

Savage does worry today about the tide turning against net-zero and climate change. “I suppose I have to be somewhat philosophical, that even if we do hit a Trump-sized or a Reform-sized road bump, there will then be a counter-reaction against that.”

After completing a doctorate and penning a book, the death of the late Queen in 2022 was what finally prompted Savage, inspired by Elizabeth II’s 70 years of service, to stand for Parliament. The decision was not taken lightly.

Rowing across the Atlantic was harder than becoming an MP, Savage reckons, but she draws parallels between the two.

Advertisement

“Once you’re out in the middle of an ocean, you very quickly pass the point of no return, a bit like being an MP,” she muses. “Once you’re there, you’re there, whether it’s because people have voted for you or because you’ve got winds and currents pushing you away from Africa and towards the Caribbean. And you’ve pretty much just got to hang on in there and figure out how you’re going to survive this experience without going crazy.”

“A lot of the work here, you just chip away at it, especially being in the third party. We often don’t get to set the agenda,” Savage says.

As Lib Dems, we really should have a strategy

Advertisement

Using another rowing metaphor, perhaps a hangover from her stint as a public speaker before joining Parliament, she adds: “Those incremental, almost imperceptible steps, just one oar stroke at a time, you just keep doing what you can to make a tiny bit of progress in the right direction, and hope that it is adding up to something.”

Savage chose to stand for the Lib Dems after reading three different manifestos – theirs, the Greens’ and Labour’s. “Spot the absentees,” she points out. Even now, Savage says she is “not political”. She rarely attends Prime Minister’s Questions in the Chamber, and one of her “big frustrations” is “tribalism” in Parliament.

Would Savage be open to a Lib Dem coalition with, say, Labour? “I know the official party line would be: no, we’re not even thinking about coalitions,” she replies.

But Savage’s personal view is different. “As Lib Dems, we really should have a strategy, because in the last 18 months, we’ve gone from being really a two-party system to being a four- or five-party system.”

Advertisement

The Lib Dems have been “badly burned by a coalition before”, she says, but ultimately they “need a plan” for this situation.

Since delivering a record-breaking 72 seats in summer 2024, leader Ed Davey has struggled to keep the faith of many of his MPs, who have many grumbles about the direction of the party, or its lack thereof.

Does Savage think Davey is the best leader for the Lib Dems? “I can’t say anything about that on the record,” Savage smiles, adding: “He delivered a fantastic result in 2024.” She adds: “He’s a very good and decent man.”

Who does she align with in the party? “I’m a green Lib Dem. I would say that I’m a bit more to the left of the party, although I don’t really like the left-right axis. I try and move away from that because I feel like liberalism is a bit of a different axis.”

Advertisement

She begins by naming a select few favourite colleagues before listing more and more.

“I’ve got a lot of respect for all of my colleagues, but some of us have got slightly different political views. Definitely, some have got more right-wing views than I do.”

On her arrival in the Commons, Savage was one of the lucky MPs to top the Private Members’ Bill ballot, and championed the Climate and Nature Bill. While she laments its fate as “kind of dead in the water” after the government’s “no”, she is positive that it inspired several commitments.

One was ratifying the global oceans treaty, a celebration of which Savage attended the night before our interview. She sports ombre blue acrylic nails to match.

Advertisement

While Savage left the ocean many years ago, are there any more rows on the horizon? “Oh, God, no,” she laughs. Are those oars hung up forever? “I think so.”

What does her obituary look like now? Is she happy with it? “If I was taken out tomorrow, I would feel like I have leaned into that fantasy version.”

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Do The UK And US Clocks Go Forward On Different Dates?

Published

on

Why Do The UK And US Clocks Go Forward On Different Dates?

We’re weeks away from the clocks springing forward here in the UK – it’ll happen at 1am on Sunday, March 29.

Here, it always falls on the last Sunday in March. After that, British Summer Time, usually shortened to BST, begins.

But if your calendar has been telling you to prepare for earlier wake-ups sooner than that, it might be because it’s set to the US’ daylight saving times (DST) schedule.

When do the clocks go forward in the US and the UK?

Advertisement

This year, the US DST period starts on 2am Sunday, March 8, in most of the US (parts of Arizona and Hawaii don’t follow the same DST schedule).

That’s weeks before the UK’s BST begins, on Sunday, March 29.

Why do US and UK clocks go forward on different dates?

In both countries, the clocks going forward at all is a relatively new phenomenon.

Advertisement

Though America’s Benjamin Franklin first called for something like DST in 1784, UK builder William Willett was to furst to popularise it here.

But in the UK, it took until 1916 for us to adopt a form of BST. And we didn’t do that until the Germans did it first – we took up the policy weeks after them.

The US followed suit with DST after it joined the First World War. This came into place on March 31, 1918. Both the UK and US followed DST and “double summer time” during the Second World War, too.

In the postwar years, though, the US’ use of DST became less unified; some places observed it, and others didn’t. The UK also toyed around with BST.

Advertisement

But in 1996, the EU decided that too many differing time zones were inconvenient and expensive. So member countries, including, at the time, the UK, all took on the last Sunday in March as the date clocks went forward.

And while US law had said DST should be state-wide in 1966, it was only after the Energy Policy Act of 2005 that US DST was moved forward by about a month, starting in 2007.

Since 2007, the US DST time has started a couple of weeks before the UK’s and Europe’s, and has ended a week or so sooner, too.

Are daylight savings bad for us?

Advertisement

Heart attacks and accidents rise at the start of DST, some researchers say.

That’s part of the reason why some in both the EU and the US have called for their countries to abandon daylight saving time.

For now, though, our different dates remain.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Tony Blair Slams Keir Starmers Stance On Iran Conflict

Published

on

Tony Blair Slams Keir Starmers Stance On Iran Conflict

Tony Blair has criticised Keir Starmer for not backing Donald Trump’s decision to bomb Iran.

The former prime minister said the UK should have been on America’s side “from the very beginning”.

His comments, at a private lunch hosted by the Jewish News, are a further blow to Starmer in the wake of his ongoing spat with Donald Trump.

Starmer turned down the US president’s initial request for US jets to use British bases to launch bombing raids alongside the Israelis in Iran.

Advertisement

He only changed his mind after Iran began bombing countries across the Gulf region, putting up to 300,000 British lives at risk.

Blair, who faced huge criticism for taking the UK to war in Iraq alongside the US in 2003, said: “I am not saying anything that I haven’t already said to the government. I think we should have backed America from the very beginning.”

He added: “We have got to be very clear about this as a country. We’re depending on the American alliance for our country. They are not just an ally, they are an indispensable ally, right?

“Every single time you test an alliance you never test it when things are easy. You test it when it’s hard. They were asking to use our bases to refuel. It’s not like it was in Vietnam, not like the Iraq campaign where we had thousands of British troops.

Advertisement

“The American relationship matters. It matters particularly today. It’s not a question of whether it’s this president or that president. If they are your ally and they are an indispensable cornerstone for your security, you had better show up.”

On the criticism Starmer has faced for allowing US jets to use British bases, Blair said: “People always complain. The problem for a leader is when you decide you divide. Of course it’s difficult.

“In the end, most of the MPs will know that going into the election it’s going to be decided on different things.”

He added: “On foreign policy, I think people would just prefer you to be strong and out there and clear, even if they don’t agree with you.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Neurodiversity, Neurodivergent And Neurotypical: Terms Explained

Published

on

Neurodiversity, Neurodivergent And Neurotypical: Terms Explained

This article features advice from Gee Eltringham, a Bristol-based psychotherapist and founder of parental support platform for ADHD, twigged.

Neurodiversity Celebration Week begins on 16 March this year, with an aim to challenge stereotypes and misconceptions about neurological differences.

If you’ve not really come across the term ‘neurodiversity’ before, you might be left scratching your head over what exactly it means – especially as it’s very similar to ‘neurodivergent’. Some people might even use the two interchangeably.

But they are different, and SEN psychotherapist Gee Eltringham says it’s important we get these terms right for the sake of our kids “because labels are powerful”.

Advertisement

Here’s her breakdown of what they mean.

Neurodiversity: the whole flock

“Neurodiversity is the big-picture concept. It describes the natural variation in how human brains think, learn and process information,” says Eltringham.

Just like biodiversity refers to the variety of living things on Earth, neurodiversity refers to “the variety of human minds”, she explains.

Advertisement

“It is not a diagnosis. It is not a label for one type of person. It is the umbrella term that recognises difference as natural.”

If we use a bird analogy here, she suggests neurodiversity is every kind of bird: flying birds, birds that swim, birds that stay on land. They are all part of the same group.

Neurotypical: the most common pattern

“Neurotypical describes people whose brain development and processing style align with what society expects and designs for,” continues the therapist.

Advertisement

“In our bird analogy, these are still birds. They have wings, feathers and beaks. In this version of the story, they are the birds that fly. They represent the ‘standard’ model that most systems are built around.”

But there is nothing superior about this group, she adds. It’s just the most common reference point.

In the human world, schools, workplaces and public systems are usually designed with neurotypical processing in mind.

Neurodivergent: diverging from the standard

Advertisement

“Neurodivergent means a brain that diverges from what is considered typical. Not better. Not worse. Just different,” says Eltringham.

Research suggests that around 15-20% of people are neurodivergent.

“In our bird world, these might be the birds that do not fly long distances. It could include the birds with webbed feet who swim, or the birds with talons who hunt, or the ones that do not fly at all. They may live out at sea rather than on land. They are all still birds. They simply function differently,” she explains.

If someone is neurodivergent, they might have ADHD, autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia or Tourette’s syndrome.

Advertisement

“Each represents a different way of processing information, managing attention, regulating emotions or interacting socially,” says the therapist.

“The difference is not about deficit. It is about divergence. Because if the world only had one type of bird it would be a very boring world indeed.”

What’s neurodiverse then?

According to Cambridge Dictionary, some people might use ‘neurodiverse’ to describe a group of people with different types of brain (for example, “we are a neurodiverse family”).

Advertisement

Others, meanwhile, might use neurodiverse as a way to describe someone who is not ‘neurotypical’ (ie. “I am learning every day from my neurodiverse child”).

Why it’s important to get these terms right

The therapist points out that when children are not understood as neurodivergent, they are often labelled anyway. “Lazy. Disruptive. Odd. Difficult. Those words stick. And over time, children can start to believe them,” she explains.

But when we use the word neurodivergent, it changes the story. “It tells us that a child’s brain works differently, not wrongly. That understanding does not excuse behaviour, but it helps explain it. And when we understand behaviour, we can put the right support in place,” she adds.

Advertisement

“These words are now used in schools, workplaces and the media. They create a pause. A reminder that someone’s brain may process the world differently. That pause builds empathy.

“But awareness is not enough. We also need curiosity and understanding. Because neurodivergent does not mean everyone is the same.”

Coming back to her bird analogy, she explains that red kites, ostriches and hummingbirds are all birds. Yet they are all very different. An ostrich will never fly, for example, and a hummingbird will certainly never run like an ostrich.

“When we understand that, we stop trying to make every bird fly in the same way,” she says. “That is where real understanding begins. And that is where celebration of diversity can grow.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Game Of Thrones Spin-Offs: House Of The Dragon And Every Film And TV Show In The Works

Published

on

Matt Smith and Emma D'Arcy in season two of House Of The Dragon

It may have been over six years since Game Of Thrones aired that divisive finale, but in that time, the show has continued to dominate the pop culture conversation.

Over the last few years, several spin-off projects have been released, with even more in the pipeline, including the franchise’s first ever big-screen adaptation.

As the sprawling world of Westeros only continues to expand, here’s a quick guide to what fans can expect from the Game Of Thrones universe…

First off, what’s all this about a Game Of Thrones movie?

Advertisement

In early March 2026, Page Six reported that a Game Of Thrones feature-length film was “in the works”, which was later “confirmed” by The Hollywood Reporter.

Little is known about the film so far, other than that the script is being written by Beau Willimon, best known for his work on the TV series House Of Cards and the Star Wars off-shoot Andor.

Per The Hollywood Reporter, the movie is being “envisioned as a mammoth, Dune-sized feature film”, which will centre around Targaryen dynasty founder King Aegon I, and his conquest of Westeros.

When is House Of The Dragon back for season 3 (and who is in the cast this time around)?

Advertisement
Matt Smith and Emma D'Arcy in season two of House Of The Dragon
Matt Smith and Emma D’Arcy in season two of House Of The Dragon

Hopefully, fans shouldn’t have too long to wait until their next fix of House Of The Dragon.

There were two years in between seasons one and two, and with production wrapping in the early autumn of 2025, the new episodes are expected to hit our screens later this year.

Joining series regulars Matt Smith, Emma D’Arcy, Olivia Cooke and Rhys Ifans in the upcoming episodes will be newcomers James Norton, Tom Cullen, Tommy Flanagan and Dan Fogler.

Barry Sloane, Joplin Sibtain and Annie Shapero will also be playing new characters in the much-hyped third season.

Showrunner Ryan Condal also recently shared that the prequel series, set centuries before the events of Game Of Thrones, will come to an end after its fourth run.

Advertisement

Is there going to be a season 2 of A Night Of The Seven Kingdoms?

Those who enjoyed seeing a more irreverent and comedic side to the Game Of Thrones world has reason to get excited – A Night Of The Seven Kingdoms has been renewed for a new season.

Filming is already underway on the new episodes, which will feature Lucy Boynton, Babou Ceesay and Peter Mullan as new characters, and are rumoured to be premiering in 2027.

HBO executive Francesca Orsi also claimed that the US broadcaster is eyeing a three-season run for this latest Game Of Thrones spin-off.

Advertisement
Peter Claffey and Dexter Sol Ansell as "Dunk" and "Egg" in the new Game Of Thrones prequel A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms
Peter Claffey and Dexter Sol Ansell as “Dunk” and “Egg” in the new Game Of Thrones prequel A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms

What about any other new Game Of Thrones spin-offs?

In November 2025, Thrones creator George R.R. Martin teased: “Apart from A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms and House Of The Dragon, there are other Game Of Thrones spin-off projects in development.

“The majority are prequels, and there are several in development – maybe five or six shows. And I’m not developing them alone, I’m working on them with other people.”

He added that these shows also include “a sequel or two”.

One of these was Aegon’s Conquest, though this would have followed a similar storyline to the recently-revealed feature-length film, so it’s safe to assume this is no longer moving forward.

Advertisement

There have also been two animated series teased in the past, titled The Golden Empire and The Sea Snake, while 10,000 Ships is another proposed live-action prequel, centring around the warrior queen Nymeria.

Which planned Game Of Thrones spin-offs have been shelved or abandoned?

Even before House Of The Dragon was made, a Game Of Thrones spin-off set 10,000 years before the main show was piloted, starring the likes of Naomi Watts, Naomi Ackie, Jamie Campbell Bower and Miranda Richardson.

However, HBO ultimately decided not to go ahead with this series.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, a spin-off about Game Of Thrones hero Jon Snow was also widely rumoured, but during an interview in 2024, Kit Harington claimed he’d “backed out” of the project.

Kit Harington as Jon Snow in Game Of Thrones
Kit Harington as Jon Snow in Game Of Thrones

“What I can tell you is it was HBO that came to me and said, ‘Would you consider this?’,” he told British GQ. “My first reaction was no. And then I thought there could be an interesting and important story about the soldier after the war.

“I felt that there might be something left to say and a story left to tell in a pretty limited way.”

Ultimately, though, he noted that “nothing got us excited enough” to justify keeping on with the series, so he made the decision to pull away to avoid “end[ing] up with something that’s not good”.

Oh, and is George R.R. Martin going to be writing any more Game Of Thrones books?

Advertisement

It’s now been 15 years since the most recent instalment in George R.R. Martin’s A Song Of Fire And Ice series, which served as the original inspiration for Game Of Thrones.

Two final books, The Winter Of Winds and A Dream Of Spring, are still thought to be in the works.

In April 2025, the author described the daunting prospect of completing The Winter Of Winds as “the curse of my life”, but insisted he’s “still working on it”, with various TV commitments proving to be a distraction.

George R. R. Martin

Meanwhile, in some good news for fans, the 77-year-old has reiterated several times that his books will have a different ending to the Game Of Thrones series,.

As recently as January 2026, he said one of his biggest regrets was that the last books in his series “aren’t done yet”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump Attacks Keir Starmer Over UK Iran War Response

Published

on

Donald Trump Criticizes Keir Starmer Over US Iran Conflict

The US president described Britain as “our once great ally” as he told the prime minister that America doesn’t need the two Royal Navy aircraft carriers due to be sent to the Gulf.

He added: “We will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won.”

Trump’s comments, in a post on Truth Social, are another shattering blow to the so-called “special relationship” between Britain and America.

The president said: “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East. That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”

Advertisement

Trump has been furious with Starmer ever since he turned down his initial request for US jets to use British bases to launch bombing raids alongside the Israelis in Iran.

Starmer changed his mind las Sunday after Iran began bombing countries across the Gulf region, putting up to 300,000 British lives at risk.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025