Connect with us

Politics

Why Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering

Published

on

Why Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering

Since the start of the war on Gaza in October 2023, Israel has enforced an unprecedented media blockade. Foreign journalists and international media outlets have been barred from entering the Strip.

This policy has become one of the longest media blackouts in a modern conflict. It raises urgent questions about Israel’s motives and objectives.

Gaza — controlling the narrative and obscuring the truth

The ban on foreign journalists does not appear to be a temporary security measure. Instead, it functions as a systematic policy aimed at controlling the narrative of events in Gaza. Without independent international reporting, official Israeli accounts circulate with little scrutiny. This limits accountability and obscures the scale of destruction and civilian suffering.

In a war that has killed and wounded tens of thousands, the absence of international media has distorted global understanding and weakened factual reporting.

Advertisement

An intentional media vacuum

The ban on foreign journalists coincides with the direct targeting of Palestinian reporters inside Gaza. Together, these actions create a deliberate media vacuum. This severely limits source diversity and restricts reporting to a narrow range of perspectives. It prevents independent investigations based on eyewitness testimony and on-the-ground verification.

Observers argue this vacuum is deliberate, designed to reduce coverage and limit international accountability.

Obstructing documentation and legal accountability

Human rights and press freedom organisations warn that blocking media access hinders documentation of violations against civilians.

Without international journalists present, collecting the visual and forensic evidence needed for legal cases becomes far more difficult. This weakens prospects for accountability in international courts.

Advertisement

The media blackout is therefore seen as a tool to delay justice and entrench impunity. Israel cites security concerns to justify the ban. However, international press organisations—including the Foreign Press Association—say no credible security rationale exists.

The controversy has deepened due to the Israeli Supreme Court repeatedly postponing rulings on petitions demanding media access. These delays rely on classified evidence that cannot be challenged.

Journalists view this as a continuation of the ban under a legal veneer.

Gaza — a clear violation of press freedom

Press unions and human rights groups say the ban violates Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Advertisement

Both guarantee freedom of expression and the right to receive and impart information without restriction.

Media experts warn that normalising such bans sets a dangerous precedent for future conflicts. With Gaza still closed to foreign journalists, the conflict extends beyond military force into media, legal, and ethical realms. The blackout is not incidental. It is a central mechanism to conceal the war’s consequences and keep cameras away from one of the worst humanitarian disasters of modern times.

As more than 2.4 million Palestinians remain trapped in Gaza, calls are growing to break the blockade. Allowing journalists in is now seen as a moral and professional imperative—to ensure the world sees Gaza without filters or omission.

featured image via EBU

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

If Starmer thinks McSweeney going helps him, he’s hopeless

Published

on

If Starmer thinks McSweeney going helps him, he's hopeless

Keir Starmer’s appalling chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, has quit. According to ‘mainstream’ media, Starmer hopes this will ease the pressure that he has been under from the ongoing Mandelson scandal. If he really thinks this, he’s more hopeless than we thought – and that’s a tough bar to cross.

McSweeney: a horror

McSweeney is a horror. Undeclared donations from the Israel lobby, spying on journalists, covert campaigns to destroy media that highlight his boss’s crimes, deep connections with genocidal Israel and a coordinated sabotage campaign to prevent Labour winning the 2019 general election. His fingerprints are on all of it.

McSweeney’s success in the 2019 general election saw hundreds of thousands die under Boris Johnson’s ‘pile the bodies high’ decision to let covid run rampant. His success in the 2020 Labour leadership election led to UK collaboration in Israel’s Gaza genocide. Not only that, but a war on Britain’s children, its poor and the rights of its people.

But in none of that was Starmer innocent. If he’s weak enough to be led by the nose by such a horror – and who would be surprised? – he’s unfit for office. If he were proactively involved in those decisions, he’s unfit for office. Either way, he’s unfit for office. Either way, he belongs in the dock and then in prison.

Advertisement

Either way, he’s hated by the public and in the end the buck stops with him. Advisers advise, (prime) ministers decide.

The most hated PM ever?

McSweeney’s departure only moves Starmer a big step closer to the exit door and a place in history as the most hated PM ever. Even more than Thatcher, and that’s saying something – because he’s hated on the left and right alike. Starmer is a dead man walking – but who is there in his party to replace him who’s any better? None, at least none with any intention of standing – the party is too stuffed with brylcreem-a-likes and mini-hims for a change at the top to help it.

Starmer will be lucky to last until the Gorton and Denton by-election later this month. If he clings on, the almost certain third place – at best – his NHS-privatiser candidate will manage will see him gone.

As the saying goes, “For God’s sake man, just go!” And take your rotted corpse of a party with you.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Fire Brigades Union General Secretary Steve Wright

Published

on

FBU's Steve Wright: “We’ve Got A Labour Government But That Doesn’t Mean The Attacks Stop'
FBU's Steve Wright: “We’ve Got A Labour Government But That Doesn’t Mean The Attacks Stop'

FBU general secretary Steve Wright (Photography by Dinendra Haria)


10 min read

Steve Wright, the Fire Brigades Union general secretary, talks to Sienna Rodgers about losing firefighters and battling Reform UK

Advertisement

“We always used to have five firefighters on a fire engine. Now it’s routinely four, and in some dangerous cases it’s three. When we turn up at these incidents, we’re unable to perform the rescues that we want and should be able to deliver. That’s what makes people angry.”

And it is why Steve Wright, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), is today warning that his members could take industrial action – and that national strikes are a real possibility.

“Yes, we’ve got a Labour government. But that doesn’t mean the attacks stop, and they certainly aren’t at the moment. We’ve lost a further 100 firefighters over the last year,” he tells The House. “Having lost 12,000 firefighters under the Conservatives, enough is enough.”

Advertisement

National response times are three-and-a-half minutes longer than in the mid-1990s, which puts firefighters and the public at higher risk, Wright emphasises – and yet eight fire stations and 42 firefighters in Oxfordshire are currently under threat of closure and redundancy.

“I know what it means to walk out of a fire station door and your community is not protected. But when we’ve seen the level of cuts that we have, with no way through that from this government at the moment to say that they will start investing more firefighters in the front line to protect our communities, that will inevitably lead us to take more drastic action. There’s only so many letters you can write.”

Wright, 43, has spent almost his entire life in the shadow of a fire station drill tower.

Advertisement

His first childhood home was a fire service one on the outskirts of Oxford; his playground was the station’s training yard. His second, in Buckinghamshire, was attached to a day-crewed station, for which proximity is even more important: there are fewer firefighters and they’re on-call more.

Didcot, where Wright worked for 14 years before he became a full-time union official, had the same set-up. Tied accommodation allows firefighters like Wright and his father to run over from mere metres away when the bell rings.

It seems Wright was never going to choose a different vocation from his dad, himself an FBU rep who was involved in the fire service’s first ever national strike in 1977-78. Wright would accompany him to union meetings as a child.

“From the age of maybe nine, that’s all I wanted to do,” he says of firefighting. “I was fortunate to join at 18. The average age of people joining the fire service is mid-20s. Everyone told me, ‘You won’t get in’.”

Advertisement

His father died of lung cancer early in retirement, aged 64, after decades of exposure to fire contaminants. Wright hopes to see the presumption introduced that certain diseases are work related, easing the path to compensation.

Even so, his son has followed him into the fire service. Ben quietly progressed through the first stages of selection before letting his dad know of his application. “I really choked up,” says Wright.

It makes the general secretary’s job feel yet more personal: “The burden of making firefighters safe falls heavily on my shoulders, knowing that my son is out there attending incidents in less safe conditions now than when I did the job.”

FBU general secretary Steve Wright
FBU general secretary Steve Wright stands next to a staircase covered in the names of firefighters who have lost their lives in the line of duty (Photography by Dinendra Haria)

The Bicester incident last year that killed two firefighters – Jennie Logan and Martyn Sadler; the latter he had known for many years – had the same effect. Wright, on the way to a retirement do nearby, attended it himself.

“Returning back to that fire station, where their cars were parked, where they turned into that incident…” he trails off.

Advertisement

Do firefighters think a lot about the risk of dying on the job?

“It’s always there, in the back of your mind,” he says. “Some people don’t always give it a second thought what firefighters go into: the opening of the door, going into a smoke-filled building, not being able to see what’s in front of you, not knowing what’s there. There is always that risk.”

Visitors to the new FBU offices in Camden are immediately confronted by a staircase covered in the many names of those who have been killed in the line of duty. Wright wanted people to come in and recognise the FBU’s true purpose – advocating not just for better pay, terms and conditions, but for their lives.

After bringing firefighters into Parliament for most Wednesdays over the last year, the union is now looking ahead to the political launch of its ‘cuts kill’ campaign on 24 February. This, Wright hopes, will drive the message home to MPs that the fire service needs investment at a central government level.

Advertisement

“Strike action is not something we take lightly. We’ve done it three times nationally. I’ve been involved in two. My dad was involved in one. But it’s often delivered for workers,” Wright says.

He had only just joined the service when the national strike action of 2002 kicked off – the second of its kind, and so hostile it led to the FBU’s disaffiliation from Labour a couple of years later (until re-affiliation under Jeremy Corbyn). He was picked out as a new rep straight away: “I think because I was gobby.”

Controversially, they were demanding a 40 per cent pay rise. “Was it the right tactic? Possibly. Would they have got less if they’d gone in lower?” Wright wonders. They ended up accepting 16 per cent over three years.

The average pay for a ‘competent’ (fully trained) firefighter today is £38,000. The wait to secure that salary varies – 18 months, two years or four – so he wants consistency across the country, plus national standards for recruitment and everything they do.

Advertisement

Terrorist incidents are another example: “There’s an agreement in Manchester, in London, but not for anywhere else in the country, so firefighters attend them but they don’t have any equipment, protection or specific training to respond.”

FBU general secretary Steve Wright (Photography by Dinendra Haria)
FBU general secretary Steve Wright (Photography by Dinendra Haria)

Wright is still relatively new to the general secretary role, having won it a year ago. The defeated incumbent, Matt Wrack, had been head of the union for 20 years, and the race was acrimonious. So much so that, in Wright’s telling, there was no handover – the door was still swinging when he came in.

Although Wrack fought for much of the same agenda Wright now does, his critics had argued that the FBU needed to focus more on bread-and-butter issues and less on politics, especially international causes such as Palestine.

Brexiteer commentator and firefighter Paul Embery, with whom Wrack had a long-running feud, also ran a blog alleging the FBU leadership was inappropriately using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with departing employees and officers.

“The union went through some troubling times,” Wright acknowledges. “I think we’ve moved through a lot of that.” He says he is running the union with more transparency and it’s “not a dictatorship”. Asked whether Embery will be welcomed back into the fold, surprisingly the general secretary says he barely knows him and has only dealt with him by email.

Advertisement

Would Wright commit to not using NDAs? “Our union is probably more than aware of what damage NDAs can cause, so we would take advice from the TUC on those and follow their guidance,” he replies, though also highlights – as Wrack did – that there is a difference between NDAs and settlement agreements (though the latter can include confidentiality clauses).

FBU sources have more recently complained about an FBU staff restructuring process which they expect will see some of them sacked. It is claimed Wright has refused to meet with their GMB reps and there could be strike action. What does the general secretary say?

“Well, I certainly haven’t been told all that,” he says. “I’ve not refused to meet with GMB reps. I have a staffing officer and head of HR who deals with those meetings and reports back.”

Confirming that he has commissioned an independent review of internal structures, he adds: “It’s not necessarily just to get rid of people… This is just another part of the process of leaving no stone unturned, making sure that we’re financially viable.”

Advertisement

Wright believes he has “reset” the FBU’s relationship with the Labour Party over the last year – “and I think it was important to do that”. While his and Wrack’s politics are not miles apart, both being on the left, his predecessor was ex-Militant and was once expelled by Labour.

“I think you need to be flexible in your approach to politics,” says Wright, who tells The House he has never been a member of any other party. He has followed the FBU’s trajectory: a Labour member as a young adult until the 2002 strikes, when he left, rejoining only under Corbyn.

“I want to see this Labour government deliver. I don’t really care who does it, I’ll be honest”

Advertisement

Wright believes firmly in affiliation to Labour. “I’m not going to be driven out by anyone that doesn’t want me. I think there maybe are some elements of the Labour Party that do not want trade unions,” he says. “I fought off, at our conference last year, a call to disaffiliate. I’m still of the view that we are best placed within the Labour Party.”

If another proposal to break ties with the party emerges at FBU’s conference this year, he pledges to fight it again. He even wants to see all 48 unions under the TUC umbrella formally linked, enlarging the Labour unions group known as ‘Tulo’: “I think we’d have far more of a say in the Labour Party.”

He praises deputy leader Lucy Powell highly, commending her for receiving criticism well, engaging closely with the FBU and helping them to build new relationships. Although the general secretary comes across not unlike Keir Starmer – serious, matter of fact, not the larger-than-life presence union leaders often project – he has fewer compliments for the Prime Minister.

This is Starmer’s “last chance”, he says, highlighting the government has scored “a lot of own goals”. Asked whether all 11 of the affiliated unions could come together and tell Starmer it is time for him to go if the May elections are as painful for the party as predicted, Wright is candid: “I think so.”

Advertisement

After our interview, as the scandal around Peter Mandelson’s appointment as US ambassador grows, Wright decides firmly that a leadership change is needer sooner and calls on Starmer to resign.

For Wright, the key priority is the party being able to take the fight to Reform UK. “I think Nigel Farage is a racist, and I’ll say that quite openly and quite loudly,” he declares. (Farage has denied ever “directly racially abusing anybody” when responding to allegations he made racist comments during his school days, adding: “I would never, ever do it in a hurtful or insulting way.“)

While Wright admits many of his own members will be Reform voters, he claims many of them are “starting to realise what Reform stand for”.

“The links with Farage and Trump, and what’s happening in America at the moment, in Minneapolis and that racist regime – ultimately – out on the streets, murdering people… Our members are starting to see the chaos that follows Reform and what they really stand for,” he adds, referring to the party’s performance in Kent, where it won control of the county council and had direct oversight of the fire authority.

Advertisement

Describing Reform as “the real threat”, he says: “I want to see Labour in a position to fight that off. And I’m not sure who’s best to do that at the moment.”

Would he, like other unions, be happy if Angela Rayner were leader? “Yeah, Angela’s always been quite good. Lots of MPs have been good for us. I want to see this Labour government deliver. I don’t really care who does it, I’ll be honest.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Prosecutors drafted his ‘death’ statement a day early

Published

on

Prosecutors drafted his ‘death’ statement a day early

Official documents released by the US Department of Justice show that prosecutors prepared their announcement of Jeffrey Epstein’s death a day before it happened.

As Skwawkbox has already covered, the same file release proves that an anonymous message board post, sent before the ‘death’ was made public by someone who claimed to be a prison officer guarding Epstein, was indeed posted by one of the prison guards on duty that night. The guard said that Epstein had been secretly removed from his cell — alive — and taken away in an ambulance whose arrival had not been pre-booked or recorded afterward.

Epstein — another plot twist

Now, another official file in the release (archived here) shows the draft announcement on Epstein’s death prepared by US Attorney’s Office in southern New York. Except that the draft is dated 9 August 2019 — a day before Epstein’s ‘death’:

This is not a mere typo, and not just because a bad typist would have had to hit two digits for ’10’ instead of one for ‘9’. The draft’s day of the week is also wrong — Friday instead of Saturday. Epstein’s body was not discovered until 6.30am on 10 August. It seems vanishingly unlikely that someone drafting the announcement would have forgotten what day of the week it was.

Advertisement

The draft was dated Saturday 10 August when it was eventually released. Epstein’s ‘death’ was officially ruled a suicide by hanging despite the prison’s failure to produce a noose or ligature. The body examined by independent doctors also had a fracture to the hyoid bone of the body, a sign of manual strangulation rather than hanging. However, many have observed apparent differences in the facial features of the body compared to Epstein, particularly in the nose and, where it would be very hard to hide, in the ears. The government was also found to have heavily edited prison CCTV footage of the area around Epstein’s cell.

Curiouser and curiouser.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why the world is staying silent as healthcare collapses

Published

on

Why the world is staying silent as healthcare collapses

Gaza is dying every day. Its hospitals are collapsing, its doctors are overwhelmed, and the world remains largely silent.

Children are dying for lack of medicine. Patients are left untreated. Doctors are forced to decide who might live and who must be left to die. All of this is happening in full view of the United Nations and powerful states that respond with words instead of action.

This silence is not neutral. It is a profound moral failure.

Healthcare in Gaza has been reduced to survival triage. Hospitals have become places of delayed death. Essential medicines are running out. Electricity is repeatedly cut. Medical staff work under siege, exhaustion, and constant threat. Civilians are trapped between occupation on one side and international neglect on the other.

Advertisement

World is silent on Gaza

Why does the world remain silent? Because political alliances and economic interests are prioritised over civilian lives. Because Gaza is treated as a distant crisis rather than a humanitarian emergency unfolding in real time.

Every day without intervention becomes another day of systematic death. Doctors in Gaza face impossible conditions. They work through destruction, shortages, and trauma, while international support is delayed or blocked. Pressure on the occupying power remains minimal or symbolic.

This silence is not just political weakness. It is an insult to the idea of a global conscience.

The collapse of Gaza’s healthcare system is not a natural disaster. It is a political and humanitarian crime carried out in plain sight. Every hour without medical supplies costs lives. Every day without action deepens impunity.

Advertisement

Gaza is not just a besieged enclave. It is a mirror held up to the world.

It asks a simple question of those who claim to defend human rights: why is the mass suffering of civilians tolerated while the world looks away?

The blood of Gaza is already answering. History will not measure morality by statements or sympathy, but by action. Every delay is another failure. Every silence is another verdict on humanity itself.

Featured image via AFP

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

I Waited On Catherine O’Hara And It Changed My Life

Published

on

The author celebrating her first story being accepted for publication in 2011 — a year before she decided to move to New York City.

“What’s your name?” Catherine O’Hara asked me, leaning forward in the booth. “What’s your story?”

I was standing in a swanky restaurant in New York City wearing a black dress short enough to satisfy management, my hands clasped behind my back in case a manager appeared. I had just broken the most important rule of the job: Never acknowledge a celebrity.

Three months earlier, I had dropped off my resume anywhere I could in hopes of securing a job that would supplement what my $35-a-week publishing intern stipend wouldn’t get me, which was, of course, everything but my subway fare.

I was hungry in every sense of the word. By the end of the day, I was offered three serving jobs and took them all. One was at this legendary restaurant continuously full of rock stars, Oscar-winning actors and models.

Advertisement

During my interview, the manager had ignored my flimsy (both in substance and content) resume and assessed my body instead. My waist. My chest. My legs. He said they had a place for me as a cocktail server in the private lounge where the windows were tinted, the tables were low and loungy, and the only clientele allowed in were ultra-wealthy patrons and celebrities.

The manager told me to show up later that night for my first training shift and emphasised that the dress code was all black, dresses only, hemlines not to exceed the end of my fingertips when my arms were hanging by my sides.

“We prefer the skirt to graze your first knuckles,” he said, making a fist and pointing to the ridged top of his hand to make his point.

I was 22, fresh out of college, and ready to do whatever it took to become a writer. If I can make it here… I thought.

Advertisement

When I walked in for my first shift, I was surprised to see a friend from college working at the host stand. Back in Colorado, he’d been a boisterous theater kid — lanky with bright blue eyes and flamboyant energy. Now he looked hollowed out — dark under the eyes, less “youthfully thin” and more underfed. He seemed tired and nervous, and his eyes flicked around as if we might get in trouble for hugging.

The author celebrating her first story being accepted for publication in 2011 — a year before she decided to move to New York City.
The author celebrating her first story being accepted for publication in 2011 — a year before she decided to move to New York City.

The server I was assigned to shadow approached the host stand to retrieve me. She was gorgeous, waifish, and in place of the air of sadness my college acquaintance had, she’d built a bitter bubble of sarcasm around herself.

She walked me quickly through the labyrinthine back-of-house, dodging catcalls from her co-workers and managers deftly. She listed off rules as I struggled to keep up. Three of them stuck out.

1. We were required to try everything on the menu, which perked me up as a hungry, broke person used to only eating family meal slop before a shift.

2. We were a “pooled house,” which meant the managers gathered and then divvied up our tips (after shaving a cut).

Advertisement

3. We were not allowed — under any circumstances — to reveal that we recognised a celebrity. We were to treat everyone as an anonymous guest. Asking for an autograph, a photo, or even announcing that you were a fan of anyone famous would result in immediate termination.

Perhaps this last rule sounds easy enough to follow, but during my first training shift, Jay-Z, Adam Sandler and Mariah Carey were among our guests.

I lasted one month at this restaurant. Long enough to eat my way through the menu and gather enough celebrity run-in anecdotes to last a lifetime. My cocktail party stories suddenly involved run-ins with Bill Belichick, Jon Bon Jovi, Jonah Hill and Josh Hartnett, among many, many others. But not even these exciting encounters could make up for the depleting atmosphere of working in a place where every staff member was a hopeful singer, model, actor or artist.

After my first shift, I witnessed the server who was training me earn over $1,000 in tips — then walk out the door with only $220 after management’s cut. When I asked about the tip breakdown, my manager was finishing a line of cocaine in his windowless basement office. His explanation made little sense, but he laughed at my confusion, and I left his office feeling dejected and violated.

Advertisement

However, what really convinced me that I couldn’t survive there long was when I realised that my co-workers all seemed to be struggling with disordered eating. Years earlier, after my dad had died suddenly of a heart attack, I’d developed my own eating disorder — a coping mechanism that came with consequences. I’d slowly healed in college, partly thanks to a tight circle of wonderful friends. Now, without them and being surrounded by behaviours that I instantly recognised as potentially damaging, I felt my anxiety rising in a new — though disturbingly familiar — way.

During my work shifts, my trainer-server and I worked through the restaurant’s menu, each night picking something new for me to try, and we’d sit on the back staircase (there was no break room) while she explained the dish to me. No matter what it was — tuna on crispy rice, a black truffle pizza, half a roast chicken on a mountain of garlic mashed potatoes — she refused to have a bite.

“No way. I’m trying to be an actress,” she told me. “I wouldn’t even eat a cucumber here. They put sesame oil on everything.”

She joked about it — “I don’t eat, really. None of us do.”

Advertisement

Though I wasn’t attempting to make it as an actress, I still began to leave food on the plate, uneasy about doing so, but also worried she might have a point. She was putting her goals first. Hunger as discipline. Emptiness as a badge of ambition. Maybe fed girls didn’t make it in NYC.

The author right after she moved to New York City in 2012.
The author right after she moved to New York City in 2012.

By the time I walked in for my last training shift on a Sunday night, I was thinner, my spirit was beaten down, and I was worried about the road I seemed to be headed back down.

I was also still broke. I’d trained for seven shifts at $10 an hour, and I was relieved when my trainer asked me to take this shift alone. The managers were nowhere to be found, as usual, and she wanted to meet up with her boyfriend — a musician who was always cheating on her. The restaurant was slow, she told me I now knew what I was doing, and, best of all, she would let me take all of the tips I made home.

At nearly 9 o’clock, three women walked in: two women I’d never seen before and the one and only Catherine O’Hara. I froze. My mind flashed to O’Hara’s squiggly sideburns in “Beetlejuice.” Her iconic “Kevin!” in “Home Alone.” The dozens and dozens of times my sister and I had watched “Best in Show.” All of the characters she’d played that shaped my sense of humour. My sense of joy. How could I possibly serve her without telling her I loved her?

They sat in a window booth with Catherine in the centre. When I went to greet her party, her friends enthusiastically interrupted to tell me they were taking her out for her birthday. She shook her head sheepishly, embarrassed and amused.

Advertisement

“We’ve been friends forever,” she told me. “They don’t let me get away with anything.”

As a writer, I try to avoid cliches, but reader, her eyes truly sparkled with life and kindness.

Soon, they were my only table. I folded napkins a short distance away from them and watched the three friends enjoy each other’s company — and one of everything from the starter section, plus a burger, the tuna and the chicken. They shared a bottle of wine and giggled like girls.

Over the course of their meal, I realised that in just a few weeks, the restaurant I stood in had distorted what success should look like, but no one could extinguish the aura of true success that radiated off Catherine. She had “it” — that thing I’d come to NYC to prove I had, too, and “it” wasn’t thinness or ambition at all costs, or even talent, though of course she had that, too. It was her sense of self — how she held herself and confidently, yet humbly, moved through the world — that no one could rival… or take away from her.

Advertisement

By the time I dropped the chocolate soufflé off, their table held the last lit candle in the restaurant.

I placed the dessert in front of Catherine, and then I took a breath.

“I’m not supposed to bother our famous diners,” I said, “but I just have to tell you how much your acting means to me and my sister. ‘Best in Show’ is our favourite movie, and your character is my favourite.”

“Me?” she said, genuinely incredulous. “Your favourite!”

Advertisement

“I’m sorry to bother you. I just had to say something. Happy birthday.” I quickly turned away, mortified.

“It was her sense of self — how she held herself and confidently, yet humbly, moved through the world — that no one could rival… or take away from her.”

“Wait,” she called after me, “What’s your name? What’s your story?”

She insisted that I join them in their booth and asked what kind of artist I was.

“Every server in this city has an interesting story,” she said, gesturing her spoon toward me, her mouth full of birthday soufflé, and the trio’s attention now fully, yet comfortably, on me.

Advertisement

I told her all about my dream to be an author and about the short story I was working on.

“What if one of the characters dies?” she riffed, delighted.

Were we collaborating? I could hardly breathe.

I was glad to have refused their offer of a bite of soufflé because the manager suddenly appeared from his basement lair, and I immediately popped out of the booth.

Advertisement

“I’ll just grab you the check,” I said, with my arms behind my back again, in an attempt to look professional. She winked at me as I walked away.

She paid the bill herself, though her friends tried, and though my tip out didn’t reflect it, she left me 100% on their $400 bill and a note that read, “I know your day will come. Keep writing.”

The manager wouldn’t let me keep the receipt, but I didn’t need it.

Catherine had given me something invaluable that night. Her kindness has always stayed with me. She showed me a different way to be an artist — to be a person. She chose passion, curiosity, individuality and humility in an industry that often made that feel impossible.

Advertisement

I never went back to the restaurant again after that night. I left before the thinness of the place convinced me I had to disappear to deserve a future. There were plenty of other workplace cultures ahead of me that would also try to normalise self-erasure as ambition, but years later, when I sat down to write this essay just days after Catherine O’Hara’s death, I could still clearly conjure that moment with her. Thanks to her, I still try to follow my appetite, to seek fullness and to believe, even on my hungriest days, that my day will come.

Sammi LaBue is the founder of Fledgling Writing Workshops (“Best Writing Workshops,” Timeout NY) and basically obsessed with the feeling of having an idea and writing it down. Her latest project is a recently finished memoir written in collaboration with her mom titled “Bad Apples.” Some of her other essays can be found in BuzzFeed, Slate, Literary Hub, The Sun, Glamour and more. To follow her writing journey and find opportunities to write with her flow, visit fledgling.substack.com.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Help and support:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel’s hidden war exposed through proxy militias

Published

on

Israel’s hidden war exposed through proxy militias

Since 7 October 2023, reports indicate a dangerous shift in Israel’s tactics in Gaza. Rather than relying solely on direct military force, Israel has increasingly used local collaborating militias.

These groups operate covertly within Palestinian society. Their roles include intelligence gathering, luring resistance members, and carrying out targeted assassinations under direct Israeli intelligence supervision.

The starting point: filmed confessions

An Al Jazeera investigation, broadcast on What Lies Beneath, marked a turning point. It featured filmed confessions from an agent arrested after an assassination operation in Gaza. The agent said he received direct orders from an Israeli intelligence officer. He was instructed to wear a hidden camera to document the killing.

The operation took place on 14 December 2025. The victim was an internal security officer reportedly responsible for monitoring collaborators.

Advertisement

Footage showed real-time communication between the agent and his handler. Instructions continued until the moment of execution, involving silenced weapons and electric bicycles.

Gaza — why militias instead of soldiers

Experts say Israel’s reliance on militias reflects operational difficulty inside Gaza. Dense population and social cohesion make undercover Israeli units costly and risky.

Using local agents allows Israel to minimise losses. These agents are expendable if exposed, unlike regular soldiers.

Security data suggest many militia members were recruited from individuals with criminal backgrounds. During the war, they engaged in looting before being absorbed into intelligence operations.

Advertisement

In exchange, they were granted freedom of movement, protection, and tolerance for aid theft. Their personal interests were deliberately tied to organised violence.

“Yellow zones” and calculated chaos

Militia activity increasingly centres on so-called “yellow zones.” There, they intimidate civilians and disrupt internal security.

Sources describe this as a strategy to exhaust Gaza’s social fabric without direct military presence. Some groups now function as a de facto “shadow authority” for the occupation. These developments indicate a broader strategy of proxy warfare. Israel is shifting toward covert control, infiltration, and internal destabilisation.

This approach aims to fracture society itself, transforming daily life into a battleground of suspicion and fear.

Advertisement

Evidence shows these militias are now central to Israel’s strategy in Gaza. Their continued use increases risks to civilian safety and social cohesion. Exposing and dismantling this system is urgent. It represents one of the most destructive aspects of the hidden war unfolding inside the Strip.

Featured image via WSJ

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Here’s What Your Preferred Plane Seat Says About You

Published

on

Your plane seat preference might reveal a lot about you, according to travelers and experts.

As I settled in for the 17-hour flight from Australia to the United States, I turned to the vacant seat between my wife and me and smiled. While other passengers might have thought it was a stroke of luck, they didn’t know this was deliberate. It was the result of my seat selection obsession.

The ritual starts the moment I book a flight: I check legroom measurements and read seat reviews, then study the airline’s seat map to predict which seats will stay open. There are rules: I go for an aisle seat on the right side of the aircraft, and on wide-body planes with a 3-3-3 configuration, I pick one in the middle section.

Even after I’ve locked in my seat, I can’t stop. In the days leading up to departure, I’m refreshing the “Manage My Booking” page, monitoring which seats fill up, debating whether to switch to 12D or stick with 11D.

Turns out, plenty of travelers have their own versions of this routine. Some travelers insist on the same side of the plane every time. Others will only sit in odd-numbered rows. A few refresh seat maps obsessively, fixated on bathroom proximity or meal service order.

Advertisement

Performance psychology specialist Sam Wones said this quirk runs deeper than seat preference. “It reflects a need for control in environments where individuals feel they lack it,” he explained. “Ritualistic actions like seat-map checking can reduce anxiety about the unknown.”

When everything about air travel feels chaotic, securing a specific seat sends a signal to your nervous system that something is manageable.

These rituals can be remarkably specific. Georgia Hopkins, a freelance travel writer, only sits in odd-numbered rows: 11A ideally, or 13A/15A if that’s taken. Rows 12 or 14 simply don’t exist in her world. “I can’t do even numbers. If not 11, I have to sit in an odd-numbered row,” she said. She also insists on a window seat as far forward as possible, so she boards earlier, exits faster and is served first.

Row 25. Always row 25. Amanda Kendle is so committed to this specific row that she will not change it, even if a better option opens up. Not because it has extra legroom or is closer to the exit, but because it is her lucky number.

Advertisement

“Some part of my anxious flyer mentality tells me if I change my seat, the plane will crash and my original seat would have been safer,” she explained. When traveling with her teenage daughter, who insists on a window seat, Kendle still claims row 25; she just takes the middle instead of the aisle. Her flexibility still operates within strict boundaries.

Your plane seat preference might reveal a lot about you, according to travelers and experts.

wera Rodsawang via Getty Images

Your plane seat preference might reveal a lot about you, according to travelers and experts.

These rituals feel personal, even irrational. Chris Lipp, a social psychologist at Tulane University who studies power dynamics, said they expose how confident we feel in public spaces.

“People who feel more powerful are less sensitive to sitting next to someone,” Lipp explained. “They’re comfortable with less interpersonal space, less worried about others encroaching on their space, and less vigilant because they don’t feel threatened by others.”

The dreaded middle seat, which most people avoid, illustrates this power dynamic. Lipp notes that powerful people can tolerate it. They will claim both armrests without hesitation, exuding a confidence that likely extends beyond the cabin. Anxious travellers either guard the armrest like a border wall or avoid it completely to prevent any contact.

Advertisement

Seat location also reflects travellers’ approach to control and efficiency, Wones says. Front-of-plane passengers want to disembark quickly and avoid feeling trapped, valuing efficiency and a faster process. Back-of-plane flyers operate differently. They’re more relaxed about waiting, less concerned with being first off the aircraft and often actively avoid the chaos of the front rows. Neither preference is inherently better, but they reflect different tolerances for waiting.

Beyond front vs. back, another choice reveals personality: window or aisle. Wones said introverts gravitate toward window seats for privacy and control, while extroverts prefer aisle seats for mobility and easier interaction.

Lisa Burns, founder of The Travel Photography Club, understands this completely. On a flight from Tokyo to Helsinki over the Arctic Circle, she ended up in an aisle seat with the window passenger asleep, shutter closed. “All I could imagine were icebergs and glaciers below,” she said. “I had to practice deep breathing because it took so much self-control not to lean across and look out the window.” For a travel photographer, being trapped on the aisle meant missing exactly what she needed to see.

I’m firmly in the aisle camp, though my reasons are less about interaction and more about autonomy. I can move whenever I want without performing a gymnastics routine to climb over a sleeping passenger or getting the side-eye when I’m up and down for the third time in an hour. On a long flight, this freedom matters. Maybe it makes me someone who needs to feel in charge of something, even if it’s just bathroom breaks. Or perhaps I just drink too much water.

Advertisement

My right-side preference has a practical foundation. Analysis of Air Canada and American Airlines seat data shows passengers disproportionately choose the left side, which means the right side offers better odds of an empty seat beside me.

Wones said that once you unconsciously favour one side, your brain locks onto it. “Some people unconsciously favour one side due to how their brain processes spatial awareness or comfort,” he explained. Maybe it felt slightly better once, or you had a good flight on that side. The reason doesn’t matter. Once the pattern exists, you stick with it, even when both sides are identical. It becomes less about logic and more about what feels right.

If you’re reading this thinking, who obsesses over seats?, that reaction itself reveals something, according to Wones. Strategic planners are highly conscientious and prefer control. Acceptors are more adaptable, with lower anxiety and a higher tolerance for uncertainty.

When my wife catches me refreshing the seat map days before a flight, she thinks I’m ridiculous. She’s probably right. But 17 hours squeezed into economy with an empty seat next to us? That’s when ridiculous becomes genius.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

18 Most Shocking Super Bowl Halftime Show Moments Ever

Published

on

18 Most Shocking Super Bowl Halftime Show Moments Ever

You really know you’ve made it as an A-list music star when the NFL invites you to perform during the Super Bowl Halftime Show.

In the past few years alone, massive names as varied as The Weeknd, Jennifer Lopez, Usher, Kendrick Lamar and, of course, Rihanna have all wowed with their performances – but there have been a fair few shocking moments along the way.

This year, the honour falls to music superstar Bad Bunny, fresh from his Album Of The Year win at the 2026 Grammys, and the world is sure to be watching to see what he pulls out of the bag on one of the world’s most-watched music events.

Indeed, as history has proved time and time again, the Super Bowl Halftime Show hasn’t always been just about the music – with plenty of shocking and headline-grabbing moments taking place at the annual sports event.

Advertisement

As we get ready for what could easily become one of the year’s biggest nights in music, here are 18 more of the biggest Super Bowl shockers from years gone by…

18. Blackout Bowl (2013)

Jamie Squire via Getty Images

This shocking moment didn’t come during Beyoncé’s Halftime Show but shortly after it, with the football game that followed (snooze…) having to suspend play for a full 34 minutes due to a power outage.

Evidently, the power of the Queen Bey is so strong, it can even plunge an entire stadium into darkness. Bow down, bitches indeed.

Advertisement

Watch the full performance here.

17. Usher Bowl (2024)

Christopher Polk via Getty Images

Usher’s jam-packed set included powerful vocals, surprise A-list guests and impressive choreo.

Looking back, though, we think this impromptu shirtless moment is probably what we think of most when we reflect on the Burn singer’s Super Bowl appearance…

Advertisement

Watch the full performance here.

16. #LeftShark Bowl (2015)

She’s not always the first person you think of when it comes to great live performers, but Katy Perry proved a massive point when she really brought it at the Super Bowl.

Over the course of her Halftime Show, Katy entered atop a giant lion, floated through the air while singing Firework, introduced Missy Elliott and convincingly rocked out to I Kissed A Girl with Lenny Kravitz.

Advertisement

And yet… the next day all anyone seemed to want to talk about was the “Left Shark” incident, when one of her dancers lost their way in the middle of a routine, while dressed as a shark.

It’s a pity, really, because Katy’s was one of the most impressive and elaborate Super Bowl shows of the 2010s.

But also… what was that shark doing?!

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

15. Madonna Bowl (2012)

PictureGroup/REX/Shutterstock

There were plenty of shockers during Madonna’s Super Bowl show (one of which we’ll get to a bit later on in this list).

Her entrance? Iconic. Her guest performers? Alarming. Her choreo? Near perfect, even if she did trip just a little bit while shuffling with LMFAO.

Luckily, this would be the last time Madonna ever had to worry about a slip-up on live television. Apart from this, of course. Oh, and this.

Advertisement

Watch the full performance here.

14. Hip-Hop Bowl (2022)

Kevin C. Cox via Getty Images

If nothing else, the 2022 Halftime Show will be remembered for the epic level of stars that took part, with singer Mary J Blige and rappers Kendrick Lamar, Eminem and 50 Cent among those sharing the stage in a celebration of hip-hop music throughout the years.

There were some big headline-grabbing moments, too – not least when 50 Cent recreated his upside down entrance from his In Da Club music video, and Eminem made a show of solidarity by taking the knee in the middle of the performance.

Advertisement

Watch the full performance here.

13. Boss Bowl (1996)

Diana Ross’ Super Bowl performance was jam-packed with hits, dating back from the music legend’s days in the Supremes right through to her solo success.

Arguably the most iconic moment of the lot came right at the end, though, when she left the field in a helicopter. There’s travelling in style, and then there’s this…

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

12. Prince Bowl (2007)

Frank Micelotta/REX/Shutterstock

Nobody would question that Prince is one of the greatest live performers in pop history, but he really cemented this at the 2007 Super Bowl. As well as covering tracks by Queen, Foo Fighters and Bob Dylan, he effortlessly performed his own songs Let’s Go Crazy and Baby I’m A Star.

He closed the show with a version of his signature hit, Purple Rain, made all the more significant by the literal downpour that accompanied it – the real shocker being that Prince still managed to retain his cool throughout. What a man.

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

11. Disney Bowl (1991)

Gin Ellis via Getty Images

If you want to talk about shockers, just wait.

Before it was so commonplace for huge musicians to perform at the Halftime Show, organisers used to think a little more outside the box. That’s why in 1991, they handed over the reins to the Walt Disney Company.

Disney’s show is not one that’s looked back on particularly fondly, with a wave of local child performers sharing the stage with the company’s iconic characters (as well as New Kids On The Block, for some reason), while also somehow shoehorning in a tribute to those fighting in the Gulf war, and a message from then-president George Bush.

Advertisement

Fortunately for everyone involved, this was also the year Whitney Houston blew everyone away with her rendition of the National Anthem, which is what most of us remember about the Super Bowl that year.

Watch the full performance here.

10. Gaga Bowl (2017)

Known for making a statement in some way or another whenever she performs live, we were curious to see how Lady Gaga would kick things off when given the massive platform of the Super Bowl Halftime Show.

Advertisement

And really, what better way is there to make an entrance than a pre-recorded patriotic tune sung from the top of a stadium, before leaping off it to perform your hits on the field below?

Watch the full performance here.

9. Timberlake Bowl (2018)

Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

After a great run of successive mega-stars performing at the Super Bowl , beginning with Madonna and ending with Lady Gaga, the stakes were high when it was announced that Justin Timberlake would be taking the stage for the first time since 2004.

Advertisement

Regrettably, his performance didn’t quite live up to expectations, with many criticising his unusual fashion choices, as well as the decision not to invite Janet Jackson to perform with him following their ill-fated performance more than a decade earlier (more on that later, unsurprisingly).

Watch the full performance here.

8. Diva Bowl (2020)

Focus On Sport via Getty Images

In 2020, the NFL lined up two legendary artists to share top billing with Jennifer Lopez and Shakira teaming up for the Halftime Show.

Advertisement

The pair’s performance was packed full of memorable moments, with Shakira showing off her famous belly-dancing skills, crowd-surfing and paid homage to both her Colombian and Lebanese heritage.

Meanwhile, J-Lo sneaked in a cameo appearance from her teenager Emme, and turned her hit Let’s Get Loud into a unifying (and surprisingly effective) protest anthem.

However, some more conservative critics took issue with the star when she showed off some of the pole-dancing skills she’d honed while making the film Hustlers. There’s clearly just no pleasing some people…

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

7. Weeknd Bowl (2021)

Kevin C. Cox via Getty Images

Given that The Weeknd’s Halftime Show performance came pretty much slap-bang in the middle of the pandemic, there was a big question mark over exactly how he would be able to pull it all off.

True to form, he managed just fine.

Embodying the “lounge lizard” character that he took on while promoting his After Hours album, the singer put an unusually eerie spin on the Super Bowl Halftime Show, at one point getting lost in a creepy maze before heading out onto the pitch, where he was met by an army of identically-dressed backing dancers in facial bandages.

Advertisement

Watch the full performance here.

6. Kendrick Bowl (2025)

Kendrick Lamar during a memorable moment in his 2025 Super Bowl routine
Kendrick Lamar during a memorable moment in his 2025 Super Bowl routine

It’s tough to know quite where to start with Kendrick Lamar’s performance from 2025.

One of the best showman of his generation, it says something that above all of that, what we best remember Kendrick holding court at the centre of it all.

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

5. Rihanna Bowl (2023)

Rihanna performing at the Super Bowl in 2023
Rihanna performing at the Super Bowl in 2023

Focus On Sport via Getty Images

Having been away from the stage for a number of years, the world was waiting with baited breath for Rihanna’s Super Bowl performance, which she’d previously teased would include a mysterious surprise guest.

What no one could have anticipated, though, was that Rih was talking about her unborn child, not least because she’d welcomed her son RZA only a few months earlier.

Reports claimed that the chart-topping star even managed to conceal her pregnancy from almost everyone involved in putting the performance together – which made it almost using the Super Bowl Halftime Performance as her way of announcing to the world she had another baby on the way all the more surprising.

Advertisement

She has since welcomed a second son, Riot, with her partner, fellow musician A$AP Rocky.

Watch the full performance here.

4. Reunion Bowl (2013)

It had been one of the worst kept secrets in music, but we still did a little squeal when the other two members of Destiny’s Child popped up during Beyoncé’s Super Bowl performance (and what a pop up it was, we could happily watch Michelle Williams finding her feet after shooting up from the floor for a good two hours without getting bored).

Advertisement

The trio whizzed through Bootylicious and Independent Women before joining Beyoncé for Single Ladies, complete with the video’s original choreo.

Watch the full performance here.

3. Middle Finger Bowl (2012)

Madonna was the main event during the 2012 Halftime Show, but it was M.I.A. who wound up generating the most headlines.

Advertisement

Upon finding out that her pre-recorded vocals would be cutting out the word “shit” as she appeared during Give Me All Your Luvin’, the British rapper decided to take matters into her own hands, or rather fingers, by flipping off the camera at the end of her part of the performance.

Although the incident only lasted a split second, it had big repercussions for M.I.A., who wound up facing a lawsuit for millions of dollars from the NFL over the unplanned incident.

Watch the full performance here.

2. Formation Bowl (2016)

Advertisement

Thearon W. Henderson via Getty Images

Beyoncé had already begun addressing social issues, specifically feminism, on her self-titled album at the end of 2013, but she cranked things up a good few notches when she kicked off the Lemonade era.

This stage of her career began with a guest spot during Coldplay’s Super Bowl show, where her first ever live performance of Formation wound up creating a buzz thanks to its allusions to Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and the Black Lives Matter movement.

Beyoncé’s fans lapped it up, and her empowering Super Bowl performance built anticipation for when Lemonade arrived a few months later, following similar themes.

Watch the full performance here.

Advertisement

1. Hey Jude Bowl (2005)

Brian Bahr via Getty Images

1. Janet Jackson Bowl (2004)

“Play at the Super Bowl,” they told Janet Jackson. “Invite Justin Timberlake along,” they told Janet Jackson. “This will give your career a massive boost,” they told Janet Jackson.

The story goes that Justin went to tear off the front of Janet’s outfit at the end of their performance, but also wound up ripping her lace bra too, exposing her breast, which was covered by a nipple shield.

Although the so-called “wardrobe malfunction” didn’t even last a full second, it had the power to bring Janet’s career to a temporary halt, and while she’s certainly enjoyed success since, we can’t help but wonder how far the talented and unique star could have gone had this scandal not defined her for so many years.

Advertisement

In more recent years, Janet and Justin’s Super Bowl performance has been used as an example of gender double standards in the entertainment industry.

Janet had her performance at the 2004 Grammys – which took place just seven days after the Super Bowl – unceremoniously dropped in the fallout. Justin, meanwhile, not only performed during the show but took home Album Of The Year, even cracking a joke about the Super Bowl during his acceptance speech.

Jeff Kravitz via Getty Images

In early 2018, Justin disclosed that he and Janet were on good terms despite the scandal, but sadly those “good terms” didn’t extend to an invitation to join him on stage, which is unfortunate, because that would certainly have livened up what was ultimately a fairly poorly-received performance.

Three years later, Justin publicly apologised to both Janet and his ex-girlfriend Britney Spears, stating (in a since-deleted Instagram post): “I care for and respect these women and I know I failed”.

Advertisement

He added: “The industry is flawed. It sets men, especially white men, up for success. It’s designed this way. As a man in a privileged position I have to be vocal about this. Because of my ignorance, I didn’t recognise it for all that it was while it was happening in my own life but I do not want to ever benefit from others being pulled down again.”

Watch the full performance here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Wings Over Scotland | Echoes of history

Published

on

The Sunday National’s front page today elicited a sigh of “So what?” from most.

We’ve already GOT a “pro-indy” majority at Holyrood and have done for the last 10 years, for all it’s been worth. But there was a paragraph in the article that at least raised an eyebrow.

Because, y’know, that doesn’t seem very likely.

The Greens trailed in a very distant 4th in the seat in 2021, despite a relatively well-known candidate (the current Presiding Officer, in fact), and since they’d likely need at least a 300% jump in their vote to stand a chance – something not suggested by any polling anywhere – we’re not quite sure how the analysis has come to that rather startling conclusion.

Advertisement

(It would seem to us somewhat more feasible that Reform could cannibalise the collapsing Tory and Labour votes to emerge as the main challenger, though they’d still be quite an outside bet in the unusually affluent seat.)

But something rang a bell as we read those lines. And then we remembered.

In 2016, an “analysis” from Cutbot, a company run by poisonous and creepy Scottish Greens activist James Mackenzie, had also predicted the Greens capturing the seat from the SNP. The reality proved somewhat different.

Alison Johnstone came a distant 4th again, but her 4,644 votes were enough to let Ruth Davidson sneak through and pip the SNP candidate by 610, with almost twice as many votes as the Cutbot analysis had predicted. We wonder what ever became of Alison Dickie.

Advertisement

The predictions (which were widely covered by a gullible Scottish media) are still worth a chuckle almost a decade later. Cutbot’s website no longer exists and its Twitter account last tweeted just three weeks after the 2016 election. So we’re not sure what it is about Edinburgh Central that appears to disrupt people’s brainwaves.

If anyone thinks the analysts have got it right this time, though, we’re happy to accept any wagers made by readers who think Lorna Slater will capture the seat in three months’ time. Just let us know how much you want to bet in the comments.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform councillor dramatically quits over council tax betrayal

Published

on

Reform councillor dramatically quits over council tax betrayal

A Reform UK councillor in Worcestershire has dramatically quit the party. Councillor David Taylor made the decision as a result of the party’s plan to raise council tax — something which the far-right party previously stood against:

Gone

Taylor told the BBC:

I walked in here today as a Reform county councillor – I won’t be leaving this studio as a Reform county councillor.

As from today, I will be an independent councillor.

He added that his constituents won’t be able to afford a “massive upheaval in council tax” and that:

Advertisement

What will happen is they’re going to pay more and receive less

Also:

I think we could have made decisions sooner and I think leaving it this late in the day to make cuts and to expect people who are already not doing so well… to expect them to pay more council tax, I just don’t think I can support that.

As we’ve covered, the trend of Reform councils raising council tax has happened despite the following:

Reform — Bankruptcy

This isn’t the end of the bad news for Worcestershire, either; the Council is also facing bankruptcy. And it isn’t the only Reform council facing this problem:

To be ever so slightly fair to Reform, this chaos of councils going bankrupt is a product of successive Tory governments. The austerity ideologues purposefully underfunded local areas, and predictably everything went to shit.

Advertisement

But to be fair to reality, meanwhile, this is happening under Reform’s watch. They need to own it.

And also, there’s zero reason to think that they will undo the underfunding problem if they form a government. In fact, it’s likely that the billionaire-backed party will only make it worse.

Featured image via BBC

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025