Politics
Yvette Cooper Warns ‘Cold War Threat Is Back’ Amid Fresh Russia Fears
Yvette Cooper issued a bleak warning about the state of the world by claiming the “Cold War peace dividend…has gone”.
The foreign secretary’s words come after the UK and its European allies claimed they had evidence Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was killed by the Kremlin state with lethal frog toxins, while in a Russian prison.
Speaking to the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, Cooper said Navalny’s death shows the “willingness by the Russian regime to use these lethal toxins against their own citizens” and proves Russian aggression will continue.
Speaking from the Munich Security Conference, she said: “We had hoped after the Cold War that threat to Europe, to UK security, would go away. It hasn’t. It is back.”
She said that the “Cold War peace dividend… has gone, and we need to be ready for Russian aggression continuing towards Europe”.
Cooper warned that Britain needs to be ready to respond to that aggression which could include hybrid threats and sabotage.
The foreign secretary said the UK “continues to look at co-ordinated action, including increasing sanctions on the Russian regime” to punish Moscow for the killing of Navalny.
The Kremlin has rejected the claims, calling it a “planted story” and “nonsense about a frog”.
The UK announced its findings with France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands at the Munich summit amid wider concerns about Russian aggression against Ukraine and Europe as a whole.
The US secretary of state Marco Rubio told reporters that the findings were “troubling” and “we don’t have any reason to question it.”
But when asked why the US did not join the five countries in making a statement, he said: “Those countries came to that conclusion. They coordinated that… Doesn’t mean we disagree on the outcome.”
America has been withdrawing from western alliances during Donald Trump’s second term.
The president has pushed Nato allies to increase their own defence spending, telling them they cannot rely on the US for so much support.
He’s also sparked fears about his commitment to Ukraine by trying to get a peace deal as quickly as possible – even if that means rewarding Russian aggression.
Rubio notably did not attend a key meeting in Munich about Ukraine due to scheduling conflicts, according to reports.
Cooper also admitted to Sky News that it’s clear the US has “shifted its focus”.
But the cabinet minister added: “That Nato alliance is still immensely strong and important, and the transatlantic partnership is still very strong and important for our security.
“However, they are changing their focus and they are no longer going to be funding so much of Europe’s security, as the US did in the past.
“And that means that Europe has to step up to the plate and the UK is part of that.”
She said Nato still really matters but “we have to use them differently” in a world where China is on the rise and there is much more “protectionism, use of tariffs or economic coercion”.
Politics
Rishi Sunak and the Times accused of blatant malpractice
Rishi Sunak was the UK’s last ever Tory PM. At least we hope that’s the case, anyway.
After leaving office, Sunak did what most successful politicians do now, and swanned off to work with the worst that the private sector has to offer. This has now seen standards activist Hugh Grant accuse Sunak and the Times of blatant malpractice:
I think that if you’re going to write a piece in the Times urging the government to use and boost more AI, the fact that you are paid by a major AI company should be in the first sentence, or at least first paragraph.
I also think that the best scenario for AI is that it… pic.twitter.com/XZ9f0Ltwu1— Hugh Grant (@HackedOffHugh) February 14, 2026
Every CEO can do one
First things first, CEOs don’t exist to improve quality; they exist to improve profitability (as Sunak well knows):
Rishi Sunak (now employed by an AI company) implies that AI must have value, just because “CEOs are talking about it”
Putting the merits (or not) of AI aside, I’m 37yrs into an engineering career and I’ve yet to hear of a CEO who wasn’t an uninformed, meddling idiot. pic.twitter.com/YrS1IthcWi
— Carl Doran🇮🇪🇵🇸🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️ Oppose Geno–cide (@CarlDoran13) February 15, 2026
The white goods in your house which are knackered within two years – that’s the fault of CEOs.
Grant’s post reads in full:
I think that if you’re going to write a piece in the Times urging the government to use and boost more AI, the fact that you are paid by a major AI company should be in the first sentence, or at least first paragraph.
I also think that the best scenario for AI is that it destroys millions of jobs with the prosperity, dignity and community that goes with them.
The worst scenario is the destruction of the human race – a fear openly expressed by an increasing number of senior and experienced AI engineers who are leaving the industry.And somewhere in between a myriad of horrors such as yet more screen learning and screen addiction for our children.
But I do see that it will make rich men even richer. And that’s the most important thing of course.
As reported by the BBC in October 2025, Sunak has advisory roles with Microsoft and Anthropic. If you’re unfamiliar with Anthropic, it’s the company which casually admitted to this:
“It was ready to kill someone, wasn’t it?”
“Yes.”
Daisy McGregor, UK policy chief at Anthropic, a top AI company, says it’s “massively concerning” that Anthropic’s Claude AI has shown in testing that it’s willing to blackmail and kill in order to avoid being shut down. pic.twitter.com/RuNO4LJKcu
— ControlAI (@ControlAI) February 10, 2026
In a normal world, a private company would not be allowed to work on an AI which is talking about murdering people. In a normal world, the above video would end with SWAT teams storming the stage and slamming these nerds to the ground.
At the same time, you should bear in mind:
- AI companies have been known to exaggerate the threat of ‘AI gone awry’ to attract more funding (the more powerful AI has the potential to be, the more investors believe they can profit).
- Just because the AI produced text suggesting it wants to kill does not mean it’s an intelligent machine with the capacity to commit murder.
They call this stuff ‘generative AI’ because it does exactly that – it generates content, be it text, imagery, video, or sound. The fact that these tools can generate a lot of stuff in succession can give the impression of intelligence, but it’s heavily disputed that it’s anything beyond a souped-up version of auto-type.
Whether this is all nonsense or not, though, Sunak and the Times need to announce who the ex-PM is working for, and what he stands to gain.
A busted flush – and that’s just Rishi Sunak
The other thing to bear in mind is that while every CEO is indeed talking about AI, many of them are saying: ‘oh shit, so this stuff doesn’t actually work?‘
This is why we’re seeing a return to companies hiring actual human beings:
bro what pic.twitter.com/EnEu09OTuI
— kanav (@kanavtwt) February 14, 2026
It’s also why we keep seeing stories like this:
A brighter tomorrow is sooner than we think! https://t.co/aEkD3nyafL
— Henry Arrambide (@Hisabelbide) February 14, 2026
We doubt Sunak will bring any of this up in his articles, and we further doubt the Times will tell you why that is.
Featured image via Number 10 (Flickr)
Politics
Javier Milei just eliminated holiday days and slashed wages
Javier Milei is the libertarian leader of Argentina. If you’re unfamiliar with ‘libertarianism’, it’s the childlike belief that everyone can just get their own way all the time, and that people shouldn’t look out for one another – just for themselves.
In practice, libertarianism means cutting ‘red tape’ for businesses so they face no restrictions on how poorly they can treat their workers. This is how that’s currently working out in Argentina (complete with quotes from the UK leaders who wish to emulate this chaos):
Nigel Farage on Milei “Doing all the things he’s done, that’s leadership, he is amazing”
Kemi Badenoch “Javier Milei would be ‘template’ for my government”
He just cut holiday days to 0, employers can pay in food and 12 hour work days. The result: pic.twitter.com/WgoFxN9EX9
— Jake 🌹🏴 (@ToryWipeout) February 14, 2026
Class war
As reported by Public Services International, Milei’s proposed assault on workers’ rights would see the:
- Extension of the working day to up to 12 hours
- Elimination of paid overtime, replaced by a “time bank” system where employers unilaterally decide when – or if – accumulated hours can be taken as time off or reduced shifts
- Introduction of “dynamic wages” based on productivity, allowing salaries to fluctuate from month to month
- Deduction of days not worked during sick leave, ending payment for medical absences
- Fragmentation of the traditional 30-day annual vacation, with employers deciding when workers take their leave
- Complete elimination of severance pay, encouraging mass dismissals and “fire-and-rehire” practices under worse conditions
- Severe restrictions on the right to strike
- Sweeping empowerment of employers, destroying the principle of equal bargaining power and leaving workers completely submissive to management
Imagine having no holiday days.
Imagine working more hours for the same or less pay.
Imagine not knowing how much you’re going to earn from month to month.
Of course you’d riot.
And if you wouldn’t riot, you’re a slug.
A worm.
But hey, at least the people fucking you over would despise you a hundredth less than they despise the rest of us!
Maga & Musk hero Javier Milei just gutted Argentina’s labor laws.
12 hour work days
No more 30 day vacation
No more overtime
Cuts sick leave in half
Employees can be paid with food & lodging.Meanwhile, Mexico is going to a 4 day work week.pic.twitter.com/kOaxMefXBB
— Cuckturd (@CattardSlim) February 14, 2026
The world’s first ultrapower vs the world’s first ninth world country https://t.co/X9UakNexqp
— Anti-Imperialist-Kun𒉭⛓️🪚🌹 | college arc (@BozarSlinger50) February 13, 2026
It would be one thing if the world was actually running out of stuff, but that isn’t the case. Every year there’s more bounty; what’s changing is the concentration of wealth and power. In other words, the rich get richer and the rest of us get shafted.
The ideology of people like Milei and Farage is to constantly push things in the favour of their rich mates. There’s only so far you can push, however, and beyond that you get riots – riots and desperation:
In Argentina, a disabled libertarian spoke before Congress, telling them to cut disability pensions because ‘disabled people who get state assistance are simply lazy need to work harder.’
Now, he’s begging for money on Twitter to replace his prosthesis. https://t.co/o9esRV009G pic.twitter.com/DdGyh2nbpB
— BadEmpanada (@NukedVeterans) February 14, 2026
Argentine Twitter is full of Milei supporters begging for money because they lost their jobs or don’t make enough.
This one is having trouble paying his rent because his landlord is taking advantage of the rental contract deregulation Milei implemented https://t.co/hdAjrYOL2m
— BadEmpanada (@NukedVeterans) February 14, 2026
Farage’s idols – including Javier Milei
As reported by the Guardian, Farage has praised other far-right leaders besides Milei:
Farage had huge praise for Javier Milei, the far-right libertarian Argentine president famous for posing with a chainsaw, saying he had been bringing in “Thatcherism on steroids – this is incredible, cutting and slashing public expenditure, doing all the things he’s done”, adding: “That’s leadership … he is amazing.” When asked to list the best leaders in the western world, Farage named Hungary’s rightwing leader, Viktor Orbán, a “strong leader”, and his “friend” Donald Trump, the US presidential candidate.
Previously, in 2016 on Fox News, Farage praised Vladmir Putin, the Russian president, who he said for “all his faults” was a “strong leader who believes in his own nation”.
So to recap, Farage is taking notes from:
Out of all of them, though, we think Farage most wants to be Viktor Orbán – the corrupt overlord of a once prosperous European power. There’s no reason Britain can’t prosper now, of course, but where would the profit be in that?
Featured image via Gage Skidmore (Wikimedia)
Politics
Ben Gvir caught giving order for Palestinian prisoners to be abused
Palestinian political prisoners in Ofer prison, near Ramallah in the West Bank, have been brutally abused by the Israeli occupation’s repression units. This happened under the instruction and in the presence of criminal far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
Ben Gvir gives orders for Palestinian political prisoners to be abused while wearing a hangman’s noose badge on shirt
The units fired stun grenades and broke into the cells. They violently assaulted the Palestinian hostages, throwing them onto the ground after confiscating their mattresses and bed sheets. Ben Gvir was wearing a hangman’s noose badge on his shirt at the time, aiming to show Palestinians, once again, that the Israeli occupation has control over them.
February 2026 figures from the Palestinian Prisoners’ Society (PPS) show the total number of arrests in the West Bank, including Jerusalem, since the start of the genocide in Gaza has risen to approximately 22,000. These arrests are ongoing and escalating.
On 9 February, Israeli occupation forces detained over 20 Palestinians during a large-scale detention campaign across the occupied West Bank. From the night of 11 February 2026 until the morning of 12 February alone, occupation forces arrested at least 40 civilians across the West Bank.
Between 6 and 12 February 10 Palestinian women were arrested, including one minor across the occupied West Bank. This brings the total number of Palestinian female political prisoners in Israeli occupation jails to 66, including three minors. Since October 2023, more than 680 women have been arrested in the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem.
Most common reason for arbitrarily detaining women is “incitement” via social media
According to the PPS, the most common “charge” against Palestinian women is “incitement”‘ via social media posts. Most female prisoners are held in Damon prison. In addition to the usual abuse suffered by prisoners at the hands of the occupation, they are also denied contact with their children and families, adding to their trauma. Since the start of the genocide in Gaza, female prisoners endure increased humiliation, including forced nostrils searches
The PPS claims these arrests are accompanied by unprecedented crimes and violations. These include “severe beatings, systematic acts of terror against detainees and their families, widespread destruction of homes, confiscating of vehicles, money and gold jewellery, demolition of prisoner’s family homes, and the taking of family members as hostages.”
44 Palestinian journalists from the West Bank, occupied Jerusalem and Gaza, are currently being detained by the occupation. Most are being held without charge and trial, under what the occupation calls “administrative detention”. These detention orders are indefinite, and renewed every six months.
Israeli occupation’s policy of daily arrests aimed at undermining any form of resistance
Arrests are exploited as a cover to expand settlement activity in the West Bank and, according to the PPS, the policy of daily arrests is “one of the most prominent colonial tools employed by the ‘Israeli’ system, to target Palestinians and undermine any form of mobilisation or resistance.” This policy has affected all segments of Palestinian society.
Under international law, Palestinians have a legal right to resist their occupier, in any way they wish, including by using armed resistance. These resistance fighters are fighting against Zionist colonisers who are intensifying their campaign of illegally displacement, imprisonment, ethnic cleansing and killing against Palestinians. And their struggle against illegal occupation and repression is more important than ever before.
Prisoner’s, released prisoners, and their families are also targeted by discriminatory legislation. Netanyahu has recently signed deportation orders against two Jerusalem Palestinians. The first was released from prison in 2024, after serving 23 years in Israeli occupation prisons. The second is still currently in prison, serving an 18 year sentence, and is set to be deported once released.
The decision is based on a racist law, which aims at undermining Palestinian presence in the territories occupied in 1948 and in occupied Jerusalem. This is known as the Citizenship and Residency Revocation Law, approved by the occupation in 2023. The announcement marks the first time that this law is being implemented to remove citizens from the state of ‘Israel’.
Palestinian detainees are subjected to systematic torture, medical neglect and deliberate starvation. And the Israeli occupation is now preparing to implement the so called “prisoners execution law“. The Palestinian Centre for Prisoner’s Advocacy says that proposing the death penalty under occupation lacks fair trial guarantees, and contravenes international restrictions governing the use of capital punishment.
Thousands of Palestinian prisoners’ lives threatened by “prisoner execution law”, thanks to Ben Gvir
According to the Hebrew News Channel 13 “Implementation of the law will initially apply to Nukhba [Palestinian resistance fighters and Palestinian hostages] who were involved in the 7 October “attack”, and will later apply to those [Palestinian resistance fighters and Palestinian hostages] “convicted of serious attacks” [against colonial Zionist settlers and the Israeli occupation army] in “Judea and Samaria” [the West Bank].”
Channel 13 also said the Israeli Prisoner’s Service is expected to travel soon to a country in East Asia to “study the legal and organisational aspects of implementing the [death] penalty.” Thousands of Palestinian detainees lives will be threatened by this dangerous escalation.
The systematic torture of these prisoners is an extension of the genocide and ethnic cleansing that occurs openly, on a daily basis against Palestinians. And it is the silence of the international community which empowers the Zionist regime to continue committing these crimes. Urgent action is needed to ensure the Israeli occupation is held to account. International silence only ensures the continuation of this never ending cycle of violence.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
British Museum removes ‘Palestine’ to appease Israel lobby
Yet another UK institution has caved in to the bullying of the Israel lobby. The British Museum has removed the word “Palestine” from its displays after demands from the notorious “apartheid lobby” group UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI).
The British Museum caves to the Zionist lobby
Like its fellow lobby group CAA, UKLFI is under investigation for using vexatious lawsuits for political ends. The group was humiliated in January 2026 in its tenth attempt to get Palestinian surgeon Ghassan Abu-Sitta struck off the medical register. The malicious case failed. But that wasn’t all.
The case judge derided UKLFI’s argument as biased, unreasonable and unevidenced – adding for good measure that it couldn’t even meet the lowest legal standard.
But despite this discrediting judgment, the British Museum folded rather than stand its ground against racist intimidation. UKLFI boasted that the museum is in the process of changing its displays to replace “Palestinian” with “Canaanite”. The group’s ludicrous argument was that using “Palestine” is “historically inaccurate” and:
erases historical changes and creates a false impression of continuity…
…For example, the information panels in the Levant gallery, covering the period 2000-300 BC, have all been updated to describe in some detail the history of Canaan and the Canaanites and the rise of the kingdoms of Judah and Israel using those names. A revised text devoted to the Phoenicians was installed in early 2025.
Supposedly, the British Museum changes are for “neutrality”. Zionists, who support the racist colony established in 1948 by violently expelling at least 700,000 Palestinians from their homes ancestral lands, claim that Palestine never existed. Its adherents even claim that the indigenous people simply simply “abandoned” their homes in 1948.
The group is also being investigated by lawyers’ professional body the SRA for “vexatious and baseless” threats to silence support for Palestine.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Keir Starmer has let the Blob run amok
The one thing Keir Starmer was supposed to be good at was what the Blob reverentially calls ‘governing’. He might be dull but at least he was meant to be competent – ‘No Drama Starmer’, the ‘adult in the room’. Under a Starmer government, we were told, the civil service, advisers and ministers would work together like the pistons, oil pumps and cylinders of a well-oiled machine, propelling the nation to ‘change’ for the better. The forced resignation this week of the head of the civil service, Chris Wormald, has put any such notion to bed. The car has well and truly broken down.
Wormald’s resignation followed weeks of negative reports about his performance, leaked to the press by members of the government. Starmer, it was said, blamed Wormald for the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the UK ambassador to Washington in 2024. The reports insist that the outgoing cabinet secretary failed to properly ‘vet’ Mandelson – a strange accusation, considering the friendship between ‘Petey’ and the paedophile financier, Jeffrey Epstein, was well known even to casual observers of politics.
Still, Wormald’s departure has come as little surprise. Starmer was repeatedly warned that Wormald was too pedestrian, too conventional to affect any meaningful change. Yet it seems the PM was unable to resist the appeal of this middling bureaucratic functionary. After all, this made him Starmer’s kind of man. His demise was summed up best by Robert Colvile, director of the Centre for Policy Studies, who told the Spectator: ‘Starmer appointed the candidate most like Starmer – against advice – and was then shocked when he failed in exactly the ways Starmer is failing.’
The sacking of Wormald capped off a chaotic week at No10. Last Sunday, Morgan McSweeney resigned as Starmer’s chief of staff, also for his role in Mandelson’s appointment. Then No10’s director of communications, Tim Allan, quit on Monday after just five months on the job, issuing a notably curt statement of resignation. He was Starmer’s fourth communications director to pass through Downing Street. It is safe to say that this Labour government – contrary to Andrew Marr’s now widely derided prediction of an era of ‘peace and stability’ – has proven as dysfunctional as the Conservative government that preceded it.
Although reports suggest that McSweeney, Wormald and Allan are men of very different characters, with varying degrees of competence, they all ultimately failed for the same reason. They were all given what can only be described as an impossible task: either implementing Starmer’s ‘plan for change’ or selling it to the public. The trouble is, there is no such plan and there never was one.
Even a more adept cabinet secretary than Wormald would have been dragged down by the prime minister’s visionless leadership. Starmer has never had a compelling reason for seeking high office or any vision for the country. And while in No10, he has oscillated wildly on every issue imaginable. He said that immigration had made Britain an ‘island of strangers’ only to then disown the speech. His one attempt at economic reform – reducing the UK’s unsustainable welfare spending – was abandoned at the first hint of a backbench rebellion. He brushed off grooming gangs as a ‘far right’ conspiracy theory before deciding that the scandal deserved a full national inquiry. Could even a half-decent adviser or senior civil servant do a decent job under these conditions?
This defect is not new. Rather, it was evident from the earliest days of Starmer’s prime ministership. Sue Gray, his first chief of staff, lasted just three months before her resignation in October 2024. Gray was to ‘lead our work preparing for a mission-led Labour government’, Starmer outlined. It was as ridiculous a task as Wormald’s brief to ‘deliver bold and ambitious long-term reform’. In the end, Gray was dispatched because Starmer had not received a ‘plan’ for the first 100 days of Labour’s administration. It was an ominous and telling incident. After all, shouldn’t the prime minister – of all people – at least have had an inkling of what he wants to do in government?
Following Wormald’s departure, there appears to be no shortage of candidates eager to jump into the void. And yet there is no reason to expect things will be any different this time. Starmer’s ‘favoured successor’ to Wormald is widely believed to be Antonia Romeo, the permanent secretary to the Home Office since 2024. In other words, she has led the department that is largely responsible for the most crippling failure of Starmer’s reign: the relentless rise in illegal immigration. Incredibly, Steven Swinford of The Times reports that Romeo had ‘impressed Starmer with her handling of the small-boats crisis since taking over at the Home Office’. With around 66,000 migrants having made it over the English Channel since Starmer came to power, one can only wonder in horror what ‘disappointment’ would look like.
Then again, you can see the appeal of Romeo to someone like Starmer. She is undeniably a creature of the Blob, with all the ideological baggage that entails. Romeo served as the ‘civil service gender-inclusion champion’ and has waxed lyrical about her efforts to make departments ‘more inclusive for trans staff’. As a committed woke activist, her claim to want to stop illegal immigration is about as credible as Starmer’s, a man who venerates the very human-rights laws that have made this task impossible.
Romeo’s failure as permanent secretary at the Home Office isn’t the only red flag to her appointment. As consul general to New York, she requested more than £70,000 from the government to redecorate her house. When this was refused, her former staff members claimed that she asked them to solicit private companies to carry out the renovations for free. Various reports suggest she spent most of her time in the Big Apple ingratiating herself with celebrities. Former staff have also accused her of bullying. There seems to be little to recommend her for the most senior position in the civil service, beyond being a career Blobber.
Worse, Romeo’s appointment would be bound to precipitate yet another crisis. Speaking to Channel 4 News on Wednesday, Simon MacDonald, who was in charge of the Foreign Office during her stint in New York, made a remarkable intervention for a former senior civil servant. He said he would help No10 with any ‘investigation’ into her, heavily hinting that he’d try to block her from the job. ‘Sometimes appealing through the media is more effective than doing it direct’, he said. Then Gus O’Donnell, a former cabinet secretary, popped up on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme to slam Starmer directly. Meanwhile, senior civil servants have spent much of the week briefing the media anonymously, leaking about Wormald’s sacking, Romeo’s skeletons and Starmer’s dreadful judgement.
Rarely, it seems, has a prime minister been able to command so little authority. His backbenchers are constantly threatening to rebel. Several of cabinet colleagues can barely hide their desire to replace him. And most extraordinary and ironic of all, even civil servants are breaking ranks to slam him and his decisions in the media.
Keir Starmer’s emboldening of the Blob will surely be his undoing.
Hugo Timms is a staff writer at spiked.
Politics
Violent Israeli settlers attack Palestinian community in Jericho
A Palestinian community, which lives in the village of Deir al Dik al-Tahta in the Tel al Samrat area of Jericho, has been attacked by Israeli colonial settlers and expelled from their homes.
Israeli settlers attack another village near Jericho
The attack, which occurred on 11 February and lasted most of the daylight hours, involved around 30 masked settlers. They arrived in ATVs, cars, and tractors, and stole 120-150 sheep, a car and a tractor:
According to the community, although they called both the Palestinian and Israeli occupation police, no one came to their assistance. The settlers, who are all armed by the government, pointed guns at the heads of the Palestinians, even children, and told them to leave or they would all be killed. They threw stones and assaulted members of the community. 10 Palestinians were beaten and injured, including women and children, and one person needed stitches in his head.
The settlers bulldozed and destroyed 19 buildings, including 15 residential homes, and stole jewellery and money. All 15 families, including 15 children, have been evacuated to temporary accommodation. They are currently too afraid to return to what is left of their homes:
Just above the community is an illegal outpost and a military camp:
So for the past two years, as in the rest of Palestine, settlers and the Israeli occupation army have joined forces and terrorised the community. There is no accountability or justice for Palestinians, and the occupation can literally get away with murder. They aim to ethnically cleanse the occupied West Bank of Palestinians.
No justice
Tel al Samrat is in the Jordan Valley. This sparsely populated agricultural area of the West Bank is rich in resources, and the Israeli occupation has wanted to annex the region since 1967. In the past two years settlers violence has increased considerably. So have demolitions of residential and agricultural structures. Large areas are also being declared so called “state land” or “military firing zones”, to prevent Palestinians from accessing their land. An Israeli law is then implemented, confiscating land from Palestinians.
The Israeli occupation recently expanded its control over Palestinian lands, by changing rules to land registration in the occupied West Bank. The changes will mean, among other things, it will be easier for illegal settlers to buy Palestinian land.
Featured image and additional images via the Canary
Politics
Coital Alignment Technique: The Best Sex Position For Making Women Orgasm
You’ve probably heard of the orgasm gap: in heterosexual relationships, women statistically have fewer orgasms than men. Much can — and should! — be done to improve that, starting with a better understanding of what your partner needs to reliably get off. A good place to start is upgrading your go-to bedroom moves.
Take the missionary position, for example. You and your partner may count this classic sex position as a favorite because of the intimacy it provides, but sex therapists say one small tweak can take it from “good” to much, much better.
The “coital alignment technique,” aka CAT, is a modified version of missionary sex, where the man rides a little higher, sliding his body up an inch or two so that the base of the penis rubs against the woman’s clitoris.
Here’s a little visual aid:

Illustration by Isabella Carapella
In one study of women who were unable to orgasm from missionary sex, published in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, those who learned the CAT reported a 56 percent increase in their orgasm frequency.
CAT is a game-changer because most women need a little clitoral stimulation to get off, said Megan Fleming, a New York City-based psychologist and sex therapist. Penetration alone doesn’t always do the trick.
“Roughly two-thirds of women don’t have an orgasm with penetration alone,” Fleming told HuffPost. “CAT offers direct pressure and rocking and grinding that gives women additional clitoral stimulation.”
So how do you assume the position, so to speak?
Sadie Allison, a sexologist and author of Ride ’Em Cowgirl! Sex Position Secrets for Better Bucking, gave us a rundown:
Start in the traditional missionary position, she said, with a small pillow under the woman’s hips, to give her some lift and support the pelvis angle.
“After you gently slide inside, shift your body up several inches, positioning yourself so your pelvis is directly on top of hers,” she said. “You should be higher up on her now, with your chest near her shoulders versus face-to-face. With this new alignment, your penis shaft is now providing pleasurable friction against her vulva and clitoris with every stroke.”
To up the ante, put a little more work into grinding, Allison said.
“While staying snug and pressed against her, grind and gyrate your pelvis in small circles against her vulva,” she said. “Try visualizing her clitoris as you press on it, and resist the temptation to lift off and thrust in and out. Just keep your penis snugly inside her, and find the rhythm she needs. ”
“You’ll know it’s working when you feel her holding you tighter and pulling you closer with her legs!” she added.
There’s an extra bonus for guys, too, outside of providing partners with intense pleasure, said Lori Buckley, a sex therapist and author of 21 Decisions for Great Sex and A Happy Relationship.
“An extra benefit is that this may also help men last longer since they don’t experience the same heightened arousal that fast, deep thrusting provides,” Buckley said.
Win-win. Now go get busy.
Politics
Is Reform ready for a Welsh spring?
Marie Antoinette never actually said, ‘Let them eat cake’. However, the Right Honourable Baroness Morgan of Ely, the first minister of Wales, really did say, ‘If people want [local] businesses to succeed, they need to use them, stop buying online, get out of their homes, and stop watching Netflix. They need to stop buying that bottle of wine and go out to the pub.’
Needless to say, those businesses in question, most notably local pubs, are suffering as a direct result of specific policies of Labour administrations in both Westminster and Cardiff Bay. It is therefore pure gaslighting to blame the people – especially in Wales, where the choice for many people outside the public-sector bubble is not between Netflix, or bottles of wine, or overpriced beer at struggling pubs, but between buying basic groceries or keeping the central heating on during winter.
Eluned Morgan’s statement perfectly captured the outlook of an out-of-touch political class lacking all understanding of those it is ruling and meant to be representing. It is why what was meant to be impossible is likely to happen in May: Labour will almost certainly lose Wales.
The Welsh Assembly, now known officially as the Senedd, was designed specifically so that this could never happen. Even if Labour did not win an absolute majority, the electoral system, combined with the cultural incompatibility of the opposition parties, seemed to ensure that the administration would always be Labour-led. This has been the case ever since the assembly’s first day in 1999, even when the Labour share of the vote fell below 30 per cent. It was on this understanding that New Labour established it in the first place – to ensure Labour would always have a power base in Wales, no matter how badly it was doing in the UK as a whole.
That is almost certain to change after the next election in May. Labour is now running a distant third in the Welsh opinion polls behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK. The latest YouGov poll actually has Labour in joint-fifth place, behind the Greens, on just 10 per cent, in a statistical tie with the Conservatives. Let that sink in: Labour, which basically owned Wales for the past century, is struggling for fifth place against the Conservatives… in Wales.
To be fair, it is not Morgan’s fault, even if she has done nothing to stop the slide. The Titanic-like final plunge in the polls is to a great extent a reflection of a similar collapse in Labour support all over the UK. Only a quarter of Welsh people who voted Labour at the 2024 General Election currently say they will vote for it in May. Labour may bounce back a little if Sir Keir goes. An actual fifth place in Wales is unlikely – but not as unlikely as it rising above third as things stand.
Even without the Starmer factor, the solid Labour base in Wales has been crumbling for some time now. Welsh Labour has now had more than a quarter of a century to put what it calls ‘clear red water’ between Cardiff Bay and Westminster, and the results have not been good. Those who supported the establishment of the assembly in the 1997 referendum, and have controlled it ever since have failed miserably to deliver on their promises. Wales has fallen further behind England in terms of most of the accepted indicators of economic development, health and education since 60 elected Welsh politicians replaced the single Westminster-appointed secretary of state hitherto in charge of Welsh public services. The imposition of the widely hated 20mph speed limit sums up the image of Wales as a nation stuck in the slow lane.
The fight to replace Labour is between Plaid Cymru and Reform UK. The public mood is not settled but YouGov polling is probably accurate in putting Plaid well ahead. Ill-informed commentators attribute this to a putative surge in support for Welsh independence, based on a survey last year claiming that 41 per cent now support it. However it turns out that this figure was a proportion of ‘decided’ voters only, with only 35 per cent of all Welsh voters in favour, and 50 per cent against. A YouGov poll last month has since reduced the proportion of all voters in favour of independence from 35 per cent to 26 per cent, closer to the norm in recent years. It is significant that Plaid itself is downplaying independence as an issue in its election campaign.
Plaid’s real advantages are organisation and leadership. It was a strong local organisation on the ground that led to Plaid’s victory over Reform in last October’s Caerphilly by-election. In Rhun ap Iorwerth, Plaid has a leader with polished media skills thanks to his years as a supposedly neutral political commentator with BBC Wales – which tells you all you need to know about BBC Wales.
By contrast Reform has little ground game and no real Welsh leadership. Nigel Farage’s belated appointment of Dan Thomas, a former leader of a London borough council, as nominal head of the party in Wales last week was a triple mistake. (This is no disrespect to the individual in question, about whom I, like everyone else in Wales, knows nothing – which itself is a problem.)
The first mistake is the fact he was appointed rather than elected, which plays into the narrative that Reform is essentially one man’s ego trip. The second is that he was until very recently a Conservative, playing into the narrative that Reform is a refuge for the people who misgoverned the UK for 14 years. And the third is that he is essentially an English politician, playing into the narrative that Reform is an English nationalist party – unsurprisingly, this does not go down well in Wales.
One is reminded of the folly of the Conservative governments appointing a chain of English secretaries of state for Wales in the late Eighties and early Nineties. Most were competent, and at least one was very good, but that was not enough to overcome the impression that London viewed Wales as a colony best governed from London because none of the natives was up to the job. The once considerable Conservative local base in Wales shrivelled during this time and never recovered. Reform is making exactly the same unforced error.
One can only imagine what Reform’s existing activists in Wales think about this collective slap in the face. It is worth noting that, contrary to stereotype, many Reform supporters are Welsh speakers and most probably consider themselves patriotically Welsh.
There is still one strong card Reform could play: it should come out unequivocally in favour of abolishing the Senedd altogether, or at least holding a referendum on the possibility. The last proper opinion poll on the question suggested that just under a third of Welsh voters would favour this. The precedent of the EU referendum suggests that this figure would increase dramatically if abolition was turned from a vague possibility not really worth considering properly into a viable proposition. It is fair to say that the assembly, as it is still generally known, is not embedded deeply in the affections of the Welsh people.
Indeed, the single-issue Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party won nearly four per cent of the vote at the last Senedd election in 2021. A singularly ignorant professor of politics at an assembly-funded university proclaimed that this was proof that the people supported the assembly. As anyone who really knows politics could tell him, most votes are almost inevitably cast for the big parties which are the only serious contenders, either for tribal reasons or for pragmatic reasons, because a vote for anyone else is wasted. For a tiny, underfunded single-issue party with no mainstream media support to get almost four per cent is therefore a remarkable achievement, hinting at more widespread dissatisfaction.
Compare that with the just over three per cent won by the Eurosceptic Referendum Party in the 1997 General Election. It took nearly two decades, but there was eventually a referendum on EU membership, and the majority of Brits supported Leave. Great oaks really do grow from little acorns. Reform could do the same in Wales, calling for a referendum on the Senedd’s future, and it would take a lot less time than Brexit did. Abolishing the assembly would be something tangible, something big, not just the usual hackneyed promises to ‘cut waste’.
In the meantime, Reform would benefit from a simple bit of psephological arithmetic. The third of Welsh voters who favour abolition are more numerous than the quarter who are currently likely to vote Reform in Wales according to that latest YouGov poll. A firm commitment to abolition would therefore make Reform look more attractive to an additional chunk of the electorate. It could be a game changer in the May election.
Otherwise, Plaid is likely to emerge as the largest party in May. With the support of the Greens, with whom it has very strong ties in Wales, Plaid is likely to be able to form an administration. If there are insufficient Greens elected, there remains the option of a deal with the remnants of Welsh Labour.
Politically, Plaid and Welsh Labour are in any case not that far apart. Welsh Labour’s ‘clear red water’ strategy aligns neatly with Plaid’s own radical leftward shift. Plaid has collaborated with Labour before. Since Labour has rarely enjoyed an absolute majority, it has usually governed with open or tacit support from Plaid. It might be Labour’s turn to repay the favour. And so Labour might not be as politically dead as it deserves to be after all.
The coming catastrophe for Welsh Labour and a glorious triumph of Plaid Cymru would not really change much for most people in Wales. Unless Plaid or Labour try to spring a populist surprise at the last moment, their policies and attitudes are basically the same. Anyone hoping for genuine change is likely to be disappointed.
Then again, how can we be disappointed when we never really expected anything else? Such is the fatalistic mood across the spectrum in Wales, 27 years into devolution.
John Winterson Richards is a writer on Welsh affairs and author of The Xenophobe’s Guide to the Welsh.
Politics
Arundhati Roy quits Berlin Film Festival
Celebrated Indian academic and Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy has withdrawn from the Berlin International Film Festival in protest. She described this as a reaction to the jury’s refusal to address Israel’s two-year-long genocidal war in Gaza.
Roy said her exit was prompted by “unconscionable” statements, as she described, from the festival jury about the need to keep art and politics separate. She outright rejected their position. In her view, it was an attempt to silence debate about the crimes Israel is perpetrating in Gaza. These are “unfolding before the eyes of the world,” she said.
False neutrality
The 76th session of the Berlin Film Festival, which began last Thursday, featured more than 200 films, with 22 competing for the “Golden Bear” award.
This year’s jury is headed by the multi-award winning German director Wim Wenders. During a press conference, Wenders warned artists and filmmakers against wading into politics, stating that:
We have to stay away from politics, because if we make films of a purely political nature, we enter the arena of politics. We represent a counterweight to politics, indeed its opposite, and we must serve the interests of the people, not the interests of politicians.
Another juror peddling the same line is Polish producer Eva Puszczynska. She objected to a question about Israeli aggression on Gaza and German support for Israel, sheepishly stating that:
Many other wars in which genocide crimes are committed and not talked about.
Puszczynska downplayed the question as “very complex,” suggesting that it would not be fair for the committee to provide an answer — Roy vehemently disagrees.
Art is political
Roy explained that while her participation had been inspired by the political solidarity from the German public towards Palestinians, she changed her decision after hearing the jury’s statements. Furthermore, she said that she was disturbed by the position adopted by the German government and cultural institutions towards Palestine.
She held the view that the jury was using the claim ‘art is not political’ to:
silence any discussion about a crime against humanity.
She stressed that artists, writers, and filmmakers have a moral responsibility to:
do everything in their power to stop what is happening.
Roy has consistently characterised events in Gaza represents as a genocide against Palestinian people. She held the governments of the United States, Germany and other European countries responsible for supporting and financing Israel, considering them “complicit” in these crimes.
She concluded by saying that she was shocked and disgusted, adding that history would hold accountable anyone who chose silence.
Featured image courtesy Arundhati Roy
Politics
Yvette Cooper: It Has Been a Difficult Week
Yvette Cooper: It Has Been a Difficult Week
-
Sports4 days agoBig Tech enters cricket ecosystem as ICC partners Google ahead of T20 WC | T20 World Cup 2026
-
NewsBeat6 days agoMia Brookes misses out on Winter Olympics medal in snowboard big air
-
Tech5 days agoSpaceX’s mighty Starship rocket enters final testing for 12th flight
-
Business7 days agoCostco introduces fresh batch of new bakery and frozen foods: report
-
NewsBeat7 days agoWinter Olympics 2026: Team GB’s Mia Brookes through to snowboard big air final, and curling pair beat Italy
-
Sports7 days agoBenjamin Karl strips clothes celebrating snowboard gold medal at Olympics
-
Tech19 hours agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Video2 days agoThe Final Warning: XRP Is Entering The Chaos Zone
-
Business7 days agoWeight-loss jabs threaten Greggs’ growth, analysts warn
-
NewsBeat7 days agoResidents say city high street with ‘boarded up’ shops ‘could be better’
-
Crypto World4 days agoPippin (PIPPIN) Enters Crypto’s Top 100 Club After Soaring 30% in a Day: More Room for Growth?
-
Crypto World2 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Video4 days agoPrepare: We Are Entering Phase 3 Of The Investing Cycle
-
Crypto World6 days agoU.S. BTC ETFs register back-to-back inflows for first time in a month
-
Crypto World5 days agoBlockchain.com wins UK registration nearly four years after abandoning FCA process
-
Sports6 days ago
Kirk Cousins Officially Enters the Vikings’ Offseason Puzzle
-
Crypto World6 days agoEthereum Enters Capitulation Zone as MVRV Turns Negative: Bottom Near?
-
NewsBeat5 hours agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Crypto World5 days agoCrypto Speculation Era Ending As Institutions Enter Market
-
Business3 days agoBarbeques Galore Enters Voluntary Administration





