The New York Mets, losers of 11 straight, are expected to activate Juan Soto and have him back in the lineup for Wednesday night’s game against the Minnesota Twins, manager Carlos Mendoza said Tuesday. Soto has not played since suffering a right calf strain on April 3.

Mendoza said Soto would go through a full day of baseball activity Tuesday and he’ll be back if all goes well.

“It definitely helps, but we cannot put all the pressure on one player,” the manager said. “We’ve got a lot of good players in there who, unfortunately, are going through it for quite a bit now. Yes, his presence in the lineup, nobody is going to deny that. But putting all the pressure of ‘oh, we have Juan Soto now and all of a sudden we’re going to start winning,’ that’s not fair for him either.” 

The Mets won their first three games without Soto, but have since lost the last 11 games. They averaged 4.38 runs per game with him in the starting lineup and just 2.64 runs per game without him. Nine times in the 14 games without Soto, the Mets scored two runs or fewer. It has been a major slog, offensively.

Are the Mets already toast? Reasons for hope despite an 11-game losing streak

Dayn Perry

Advertisement

Soto’s absence alone doesn’t explain the skid — the Mets have a lot of underperforming players — but his return will boost the offense and perhaps spark the team. They certainly need it. Soto authored a .355/.412/.516 batting line before his injury and he still leads their position players in WAR.

The 27-year-old Silver Slugger hit .263/.396/.525 with 43 home runs and 38 stolen bases last season, his first with the Mets. That earned him a third-place finish in the National League MVP voting. Soto joined the Mets on a record 15-year, $756 million contract in December 2024.

On the pitching side of things, the Mets are also calling up Christian Scott, who has been out since July 2024 after undergoing Tommy John surgery, Mendoza announced. Scott will start Thursday and David Peterson will remain in the bullpen, where he was shifted last rotation.

The Mets have the National League’s worst record at 7-15. No team in baseball history has lost 15 of their first 22 games and rallied to post a 90-win season.

The NFL Draft is here, and the Fantasy landscape is about to change dramatically. Some draft picks will work in our favor, while others will cause chaos. It’s the same drill every season, and it’s fun to react to the rookies.

Prior to the NFL Draft, we have our wish list for each NFC North team — pros and cons — of what we want to see happen. While the obvious choice is upgraded offensive lines across the board, we won’t get into that here. We also want to avoid as many crowded backfields as possible.

Ultimately, we want situations that will make our Fantasy rosters better. Hopefully, that’s what will happen when the NFL Draft is done.

Chicago

Picks: Round 1 (25 overall), Round 2 (57), Round 2 (60), Round 3 (89), Round 4 (129), Round 7 (239), Round 7 (241)
Team Needs: DL, S, OT, CB, EDGE, IOL, WR
Fantasy Want: Wide receiver
Fantasy Don’t Want: Running back depth

I’d be OK if the Bears avoided taking skill players in the NFL Draft and stayed with who they have in all the key spots. By trading D.J. Moore to Buffalo, Chicago opened the door for Luther Burden III and Rome Odunze to get plenty of targets, along with standout sophomore tight end Colston Loveland. The backfield is also fine with the duo of D’Andre Swift and Kyle Monangai, and the Bears have the chance to be one of the top offenses for Fantasy managers with coach Ben Johnson and quarterback Caleb Williams. That said, Chicago will likely add a receiver at some point to replace Moore, especially since the current No. 3 receiver is Kalif Raymond. Ideally, that rookie receiver won’t take too many targets away from Burden, Odunze, and Loveland, and I’m excited to draft one or all of that trio in most of my leagues this year.

Detroit

Picks: Round 1 (17 overall), Round 2 (50), Round 4 (118), Round 4 (128), Round 5 (157), Round 5 (181), Round 6 (205), Round 6 (213), Round 7 (222)
Team Needs: OT, IOL, EDGE, DL, LB, CB
Fantasy Want: Running back depth
Fantasy Don’t Want: Wide receiver

It says the Fantasy Want for the Lions is running back depth, but that’s really more of an insurance policy in case something happens to Jahmyr Gibbs. While Isiah Pacheco would be OK as a replacement, he’s let us down as a Fantasy running back in the past two seasons since suffering a broken leg in 2024 with the Chiefs. There might be a rookie with more upside, and that’s something to monitor during the NFL Draft. I don’t want to see Detroit add a rookie receiver since I love the trio of Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jameson Williams and Isaac TeSlaa. Along with tight end Sam LaPorta, who should benefit with new offensive coordinator Drew Petzing, the Lions have plenty of pass catchers to support Jared Goff — and Fantasy managers. We don’t need another distraction in the passing game in Detroit.

Green Bay

Picks: Round 2 (52 overall), Round 3 (84), Round 4 (120), Round 5 (153), Round 5 (160), Round 6 (201), Round 7 (236), Round 7 (255)
Team Needs: CB, DL, IOL, OT, LB, EDGE
Fantasy Want: Running back depth
Fantasy Don’t Want: Wide receiver

The Packers lost some key pieces on offense this offseason with Romeo Doubs (Patriots), Dontayvion Wicks (Philadelphia) and Emanuel Wilson (Seahawks) all joining new teams. That’s great news for the receivers left in Green Bay, including Christian Watson, Matthew Golden and Jayden Reed, along with tight end Tucker Kraft, and we want to see concentrated targets for that quartet. But it’s not a bad idea for the Packers to add a backup running back for Josh Jacobs with Wilson gone, especially since MarShawn Lloyd (hamstring) has a hard time staying healthy. Jacobs missed two games in 2025, and the right handcuff in Green Bay could be worth a late-round pick in all leagues.

Minnesota

Picks: Round 1 (18 overall), Round 2 (49), Round 3 (82), Round 3 (97), Round 5 (163), Round 6 (196), Round 7 (234), Round 7 (235), Round 7 (244)
Team Needs: LB, CB, S, DL, WR, QB, EDGE, TE
Fantasy Want: Running back depth
Fantasy Don’t Want: Wide receiver

The two questions I have about the Vikings are who will start at quarterback, although we all expect Kyler Murray to win the job. And what’s going to happen with the backfield after Aaron Jones stayed in Minnesota? It would be great if the Vikings left Jones and Jordan Mason in defined roles, with Mason playing on running downs and near the goal line, while Jones handles passing-downs work. But it will likely be a split again, like we saw in 2025, and it could be frustrating for Fantasy managers unless one suffers an injury. Now, despite that potential frustration, I’d be OK if Minnesota decided to add a running back of the future since Jones is 31 and Mason is more of a backup than a featured option. I don’t want to see another receiver join the Vikings so Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison and T.J. Hockenson can soak up targets. But with Jalen Nailor now in Las Vegas, Minnesota could add another rookie receiver in the NFL Draft for depth.

Despite all of his accolades, Saul ‘Canelo’ Alvarez has been accused of running “scared” and denying boxing fans the fight they “deserve”.

Having become a four-weight world champion, the 35-year-old has already cemented his legacy as a future Hall of Famer and one of the greatest Mexican fighters in history.

Even at this late stage in his career, though, there remains a desire to compete at the highest level and seek further challenges.

This much was evident during his showdown with Terence Crawford last September, when Canelo lost a unanimous decision but nonetheless showed glimpses of world-class flair.

He now appears determined to reclaim a portion of his undisputed super-middleweight crown on September 12, when he is set to enter a world title fight in Saudi Arabia.

Among the names being mentioned for such an occasion is Christian Mbilli, who was elevated from ‘interim’ to full WBC super-middleweight champion following Crawford’s retirement.

But while Mbilli represents a solid opponent, many will find it difficult to forget Canelo’s lack of enthusiasm for a clash with David Benavidez.

While the current WBC light-heavyweight champion was still campaigning at 168lbs, he repeatedly called for a shot at the Mexican but was never presented with such an opportunity.

For that reason, Benavidez struggles to see their fight ever materialising, telling Come And Talk 2 Me that he believes Canelo has actively avoided him.

“He’s scared – he has no balls. That’s what it is. I give Canelo all the respect – he’s done everything he’s done – but, at the end of the day, I was the No.1 contender in two weight classes for a long, long time.

“He has shown that he doesn’t want to fight me. It’s really a shame because this is a fight everybody wants to see. This is a fight that the fans deserve.

“I believe in myself and my skills 100%, so I feel like, if he says he’s the baddest man on the planet… why not give the fans what they want to see?”

Advertisement

Given that Benavidez’s next outing will see him challenge unified cruiserweight champion Gilberto Ramirez on May 2, it is becoming increasingly less likely that he will ever collide with Canelo, though a promise to return to light-heavyweight, given Canelo has competed in that division twice before, leaves fans some hope.

The 2026 NFL Draft class is nothing if not unique. I’ve referred to it as an evaluators draft throughout the spring because almost no prospect comes without red flags in his profile. To top it off, the strongest position group in the class, linebacker, is one that’s been devalued at the NFL level and rarely goes early anymore.

I’m not even going to try to act like I know how this draft is going to play out, but that’s exactly what makes it one of the most interesting drafts I can remember. No one has any clue what’s going to happen this year.

The fatal flaws of the EDGE class

Your favorite edge rusher in this class probably has a glaring red flag that could limit his success at the next level. With Rueben Bain Jr. and Cashius Howell, it’s obviously the sub-31-inch arms. With Arvell Reese, it’s the lack of reps. With David Bailey, it’s his bend and play vs. the run. With Keldric Faulk, it’s his production. With R Mason Thomas, it’s his size. With Akheem Mesidor, it’s his age and modest tools. And that goes on down the line.

If they are all flawed, how do we stack them up? As I do with every position in the NFL Draft, I prefer the prospects who still produced despite their flaws. That’s why Bain tops my list. His 30⅞-inch arms were such weapons on tape at Miami that it’s hard to see them suddenly becoming a huge issue in the NFL.

Reese checks in next because he produced when called upon as a pass rusher, and he never even got practice reps doing it. He was so freaky that it didn’t matter. That bodes well for what will happen when the 20-year-old gets a full workload rushing the passer.

After those two, Bailey and Mesidor are the only other edge rushers in my top 32. There’s no doubt when you watch their tape that they produced. While I think they have more worrisome athletic limitations than Bain and Reese, they are both more than capable athletes who can get the job done in the NFL.

Renner’s final NFL Draft big board: Ranking 250 prospects in a wild 2026 class

Advertisement

Mike Renner

Tackle or guard?

There’s a real chance the 2026 draft ties the 2024 draft for the modern record with nine offensive linemen coming off the board in the first round. Whether we see seven offensive tackles taken in Round 1, though, will come down to how you categorize them. Three of the top offensive linemen in this draft, and potentially the top three off the board, all come with questions about whether they project best at tackle or guard in the NFL.

Advertisement

Kadyn Proctor

BAMA • OT • #74

Five sacks and 36 pressures allowed over past two seasons (12 sacks and 36 pressures allowed as freshman in 2023)

View Profile

Advertisement

At nearly 6-feet-7 with 33⅜-inch arms, there’s nothing from a frame perspective that suggests Kadyn Proctor would be better suited at guard than tackle besides his listed weight. While the recent track record of Alabama tackles drafted in the top 10 — J.C. Latham, Evan Neal and Jedrick Wills — isn’t helping him in evaluators’ eyes, it’s worth noting that coach Kalen DeBoer brought a much more pass-happy attack to Tuscaloosa. In fact, Proctor had the second-most true pass sets of any tackle in college football last year.

From a performance perspective, most of his worrisome reps in the pass game came early in the season, when he admittedly was playing heavier than he should have been. Later in the season, that was no issue. He handled Oklahoma speed-rusher R Mason Thomas in their matchup, which is a great litmus test to me for whether he’d need to kick inside. Because of that, he’s sticking at tackle until I’m shown otherwise in the NFL.

Verdict: Tackle

Advertisement

While Proctor’s potential move to guard was tied to athleticism, Spencer Fano‘s decidedly is not. For my money, he’s the single best mover in the offensive line class. His 4.91-second 40-yard dash and 7.34-second 3-cone at the NFL Scouting Combine back that up.

Fano’s move to the interior revolves entirely around his hotly contested arm length. He went from measuring 32⅛-inch arms — which would be the shortest of any tackle in the NFL — at the combine to 32⅞-inch arms — which are in range with numerous current starting tackles — at his pro day. We may never know his true arm length, but there’s another data point that makes me think he won’t be a Will Campbell situation. Fano’s wingspan measured 80¼ inches at the combine. That’s nearly 3 inches longer than Campbell’s and even longer than All-Pro tackle Rashawn Slater.

Given how well Fano can mitigate his length issues with his quickness, there’s little reason to think he has to move inside in the NFL.

Verdict: Tackle

Advertisement

From a purely aesthetic standpoint, Francis Mauigoa presents as the most guard-like. He carries most of his 329 pounds in his lower half, and it shows in the run game. While his foot speed is more than adequate to stay at tackle, locating in space is easily one of the weakest parts of his game. On the flip side, his biggest strength is his ability to end reps early when he gets his vise-grip hands on defenders.

That combination makes me think his ceiling is clearly higher at guard, and that’s where I’d start him early on. He can certainly be a starting tackle, but I don’t think his ceiling would be nearly as high there.

Verdict: Guard

Contextualizing age

This class, more than any I can remember, will test how well the NFL can project developmental curves. That’s because there’s a healthy share of 20-year-olds as well as 24-plus-year-olds among the top 50 picks. The top prospects who won’t be able to legally drink on draft day are as follows:

• Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame — 20.90 years old on April 23
• Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami — 20.88
• Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama — 20.88
• Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina — 20.81
• Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee — 20.68
• Connor Lew, IOL, Auburn — 20.65
• Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State — 20.65
• Keldric Faulk, EDGE/DL, Auburn — 20.63

No, those aren’t typos. Mauigoa and Proctor share the same birthday (June 4), as do Lew and Reese (Aug. 30).

On the flip side, here’s a list of potential top 100 picks who are close to or already able to legally rent a car:

• Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami — 25.05
• Romello Height, EDGE, Texas Tech — 25.03
• Keagen Trost, IOL, Missouri — 25.02
• Keionte Scott, CB, Miami — 24.70
• Nate Boerkircher, TE, Texas A&M — 24.63
• Treydan Stukes, CB, Arizona — 24.61
• Emmanuel Pregnon, IOL, Oregon — 24.55
• Logan Jones, IOL, Iowa — 24.48
• Garrett Nussmeier, QB, LSU — 24.21
• Zakee Wheatley, S, Penn State — 24.15

That’s 10 guys, with a handful more who should come off the board early on Day 3. When evaluating 20-year-olds compared with 24-plus-year-olds, it’s important to remember it’s not apples to apples. The skill and physical development from someone’s redshirt sophomore year to his redshirt senior year is typically substantial. With guys like Pregnon or Stukes, we got to see the more finished product in a way we didn’t with Lew and Cisse.

For me, the finished product for players like Mesidor and Stukes already looks like a plus NFL starter, so I don’t worry too much about what’s left in their development. But when I still have questions about how someone’s game will translate and he is already five or six years into his college career, I’ll err on the side of youth.

One-year wonder QBs

With the Ty Simpson buzz reaching a crescendo, along with some interesting takes in the national media earlier this month, his draft range seems to have the widest spread of anyone heading into Round 1. That’s because so many people differ on what to make of a quarterback who only impressed for one year (really more like nine games).

Bill Parcells’ famous quarterback rules are clear about which side of the debate he’d fall on: three-year starter, 30-plus starts and 23-plus wins were a must. The Big Tuna saw how much in-game experience mattered at the most complex position in all of sports. The modern track record tends to back that up.

Here’s how recent first-round quarterbacks with limited starting experience have fared:

• Anthony Richardson (No. 4 overall, 2023)
• Trey Lance (No. 3 overall, 2021)
• Mac Jones (No. 15 overall, 2021)
• Kyler Murray (No. 1 overall, 2019)
• Dwayne Haskins (No. 15 overall, 2019)
• Mitchell Trubisky (No. 2 overall, 2017)
• Ryan Tannehill (No. 8 overall, 2012)
• Cam Newton (No. 1 overall, 2011)

The biggest success story is obviously Cam Newton, but even he started a year in junior college. Kyler Murray and Ryan Tannehill have had successful seasons in their careers, although I’m not sure their respective fan bases would take either again if given a do-over.

Advertisement

So how does Simpson’s tape stack up to those who came before him? While I wasn’t formally scouting when Tannehill and Newton were prospects, Simpson’s pro-readiness clearly trumps that of Richardson, Lance and Haskins. He’s much more physically gifted than Mac Jones and arguably on par with Trubisky, although with a smaller frame. I compared his capabilities to Fernando Mendoza’s earlier this draft season and remain confident Simpson will be a first-rounder.

Advertisement

Cole Payton

NDST • QB • #9

2025: Set NDSU single-season records for pass efficiency (193.8), yards per attempt (12.1) and total offense (268.9 yards per game, 9.71 yards per play)

Advertisement

View Profile

An underrated aspect of this quarterback class is that Simpson isn’t the only one-year wonder. North Dakota State’s Cole Payton fits that mold. While Payton was in his fifth year and Lance was in his second in their lone seasons as signal-callers for the Bison, there’s no comparison statistically. Payton wiped the floor with Lance’s efficiency numbers, as you can see below:

Payton was not only accurate on tape, he showed high-end athleticism and a solid NFL arm. He doesn’t have the intriguing youth or the cannon that Lance had, but Payton should easily be a top-five quarterback off the board this weekend.

2026 NFL Draft QB mock: Predicting landing spot for the top 10 quarterbacks

John Breech

Advertisement

Who is WR1?

This year is the most hotly contested WR1 class I can remember. Five different receivers all have a legitimate case to be WR1. Each has a distinct trait he does better than the other four, so it ultimately comes down to what you value most.

These are tough calls, especially without projecting a specific scheme or role. In the end, I tend to lean toward separators. It’s the hardest part of playing receiver. That’s why Concepcion ended up as my WR1. He’s a supreme athlete who can get open at every level of the field and a much tougher route runner than his 196 pounds suggest. As long as you get the role right in this draft class, though, I don’t think you can go wrong with any of the five listed above.

The drops are real, but KC Concepcion is a first-round pick

Dave Richard

Advertisement

Sleepers

First off, don’t be the sleeper police. No one likes the sleeper police. I’ll admit some of these aren’t deep cuts, so I’ll explain why I included each. These are prospects who are under the radar for one reason or another and deserve more recognition.

Advertisement

Eli Heidenreich is everyone’s favorite Day 3 running back. I included him because when most people hear “Navy” and “draft,” they’re more likely to think of World War II than the NFL, but Heidenreich is out to change that. No Navy prospect has gone in the top 100 since guard Bob Reifsnyder was selected No. 45 overall by the Los Angeles Rams in 1959! The closest the program has come since is running back Napoleon McCallum, who went No. 108 overall to the Los Angeles Raiders in 1986.

I’m not saying Heidenreich will go in the top 100, but he should at least come off the board before a long snapper. He’s the best receiver in the running back class. Heck, receiver may even be his best position in the NFL after catching 51 passes for 941 yards last season. I’m intrigued by his potential physical development without the cardio rigors of the Naval Academy. From a testing standpoint, he was nearly identical to Christian McCaffrey coming out.

He’ll be a very interesting prospect to track throughout his career.

Nate Boerkircher isn’t exactly a deep sleeper, coming from a blue-blood program and off an impressive Senior Bowl. I included him because he’s never been a full-time starter in college, yet I think he could become one in the NFL. 

He has exceptional ball skills (ask Notre Dame fans) and posted the second-fastest 10-yard split in the tight end class (1.58 seconds) behind Kenyon Sadiq. At the Senior Bowl, he was clearly the best tight end in one-on-ones. I don’t know where he’ll go, but he’ll find a role wherever he lands.

Advertisement

Kaleb Proctor is another small-school prospect gaining traction. I see more than just a fun Day 3 pick, though, as he checked in at No. 71 on my final board. He has elite twitch, shown by his 4.79 40-yard dash, 1.68 10-yard split and 9-foot-5 broad jump at the combine. His competition level was low, but he showed the same high-end pass-rushing ability against LSU last fall and at Shrine Bowl practices. You can’t coach what he has.

Advertisement

While Proctor has drawn plenty of attention in this defensive tackle class, Jayden Loving is still flying under the radar despite freaky testing numbers of his own. At 6-foot-1 and 309 pounds, he ran a 4.82 40-yard dash with a 1.64 10-yard split. He also posted a 35-inch vertical, a 7.15 3-cone and 33 bench reps. You won’t find many better testing profiles at defensive tackle in NFL history. 

Loving bounced from Bethune-Cookman to Western Kentucky before landing at Wake Forest for one season. His explosiveness consistently showed up in the run game, where it was hard to keep him out of the backfield. He needs serious skill development, but not much to make an impact in the NFL.

Advertisement

If Arizona State tackle Max Iheanachor’s late start in football intrigues you, consider Bakyne Coly the Day 3 version. He began at Lawrence Tech — an NAIA school — to play basketball before switching to football. He transferred to Purdue in 2023 and finally started this past season. 

While he was rough early, he flashed late with strong reps against high-end competition like Ohio State, Washington and Indiana. He moves well for the position and has ideal size (6-foot-6, 307 pounds) and length (33¼-inch arms) to stick at tackle. He’ll be a late Day 3 pick, but he’s easily my favorite developmental tackle in the class.

Advertisement

Jackson Kuwatch was a former top recruit at Ohio State but got caught in a position logjam that included two top-10 picks in this year’s class. While he may not match the athletic profile of Arvell Reese or Sonny Styles, Kuwatch is still a freak in his own right. 

His 1.5 10-yard split is the fastest ever recorded for an off-ball linebacker, according to MockDraftable. That shows up on tape, where he’s incredibly nimble working through traffic at the second level. He’ll have to be a pure weakside linebacker and needs more experience, but there’s plenty to work with here.

Abhishek Sharma scythed through a hapless Delhi Capitals bowling attack with a scintillating unbeaten century as Sunrisers Hyderabad posted an imposing 242 for 2 on a placid track in an IPL match on Tuesday. Abhishek (135 not out off 68 balls) was at his imperious best as neither Nitish Rana‘s off-breaks (0/55 in 4 overs) bothered him nor did Lungi Ngidi‘s dipping slower ones (0/41 in 4 overs) have any effect on his strokeplay, as he smashed 10 sixes along with an equal number of boundaries.

Even with a relatively off-colour Travis Head (37 off 26 balls) for company, he added 97 runs for the opening stand. Then skipper Ishan Kishan (25 off 13 balls) joined the party, adding another 79 runs for the second wicket in just 5.5 overs to create a perfect launchpad for the final assault.

Towards the end, as Abhishek seemed a bit tired, Heinrich Klaasen chanced his arm to hit a quickfire 37 not out off 13 balls.

Delhi Capitals’ ploy of starting with an off-spinner – that too a mediocre part-timer like Nitish Rana (0/55 in 4 overs) – backfired badly, as he was given four overs in which he was hit for half a dozen sixes, all by left-handed batters.

DC Not at Their Tactical Best

The DC coaching staff, headlined by Director of Cricket Venugopal Rao and head coach Hemang Badani, have not exactly been at their tactical best throughout the tournament, and Tuesday was one such occasion. Rana bowled a tidy first over, but the second went for 20, and after the strategic time-out, he was again given two more overs, one of which went for 23.

Even skipper Axar Patel (1/23 in 2 overs) will have some answering to do as to why, as a frontline spinner, he did not complete his quota and why Kuldeep Yadav (0/30 in 2 overs) was not trusted after one bad over (22 runs), while someone like Rana was persisted with.

In all, the two-and-a-half spinners (the half being Rana) used by DC went for 108 runs in their combined eight overs.

The Powerplay yielded 67 runs, but DC completely lost the plot during the middle phase between overs 7 and 15, in which 116 runs were conceded – an unacceptable return.

The hallmark of Abhishek’s innings was how he adjusted the downswing of his bat depending on the bowler, especially Ngidi, whom he played late and in front of the wicket. It seemed Abhishek was in the mood to exhibit his range-hitting skills, with most of his sixes struck in front of the wicket.

It was a slightly slower century by his standards. Even then, Abhishek managed a strike rate north of 200, bringing up his hundred in 47 balls. But he did not stop there as Sunrisers Hyderabad reached a total that looks almost improbable to chase, given the batting depth that DC possess

Featured Video Of The Day

IPL 2026 News | Shami’s Sensation Leads Lucknow to First Win of Season

Deontay Wilder could soon be presented with a world title opportunity, but only if the relevant champion retains his belt.

The 40-year-old comes off a split decision victory over Derek Chisora, with whom he engaged in a chaotic 12-round battle at London’s O2 Arena earlier this month.

Two knockdowns proved decisive as he triumphed over his fellow veteran, who has since made a U-turn on his retirement promise and demanded a rematch.

Whether their second encounter comes to fruition, it remains to be seen, but Wilder is nonetheless likely to remain in the sport for a little while longer.

In fact, ‘The Bronze Bomber’ could potentially be awarded the opportunity to become a two-time world champion, entering his first title fight since suffering an 11th-round stoppage defeat to Tyson Fury in 2021.

This, however, hinges on a number of factors, including the outcome of Fabio Wardley vs Daniel Dubois, which takes place at Manchester’s Co-op Live Arena on May 9.

Should he emerge victorious against Dubois, which is no foregone conclusion, then Wardley would be open to defending his WBO world title against Wilder.

At the same time, though, the 31-year-old has told Fight Hub TV that he would only be interested in facing the American if a potential undisputed showdown with Oleksandr Usyk fails to materialise.

“Of course I would definitely entertain a Deontay Wilder fight. Priority number one is Daniel Dubois, come through that fight and get rid of him then it would be Oleksandr Usyk, that would be my aim but if that fight doesn’t materialise or just isn’t doable, then yeah, third on the list would be Deontay Wilder.”

It remains to be seen whether Usyk, who still holds the WBC, IBF and WBA titles, will entertain a unification fight with the Wardley-Dubois winner after he takes on Rico Verhoeven on May 23.

Cole Palmer was linked with a shock move to Manchester United in the January transfer window before Liam Rosenior dubbed him untouchable, but one thing could change matters

Paul Merson believes that Cole Palmer will move to Manchester United if Chelsea fail to secure Champions League qualification for 2026/27. The Wythenshawe-born talent was the talk of the town during the January transfer window, with Unired linked with a shock move for him.

Rumours suggested that the Manchester City academy graduate was unsettled in the capital, and that he could return to the north west once more to don United red. However, such reports were rubbished by Liam Rosenior, who explained that Palmer is content at Stamford Bridge.

The head coach, who took the reins from Enzo Maresca earlier this year, also claimed that the 23-year-old – who is contracted with Chelsea until 2033 – is untouchable given his lengthy deal and the fee that the Blues would command to let him leave.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our United WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. You can also join our United Facebook page by clicking HERE and don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

However, as the season draws to a close, Merson believes that United could be an attractive move this summer should Chelsea fail to secure Champions League football. Speaking with Sky Sports, the pundit said: “If Chelsea don’t beat Brighton on Tuesday, they could be 11th by the end of the week.

“And do I expect them to beat Brighton on Tuesday? No. The only consolation is if they beat Brighton, then Nottingham Forest – then they have Liverpool in a must-win game.

“At that point you never know. But Chelsea don’t play any other team in the top five apart from that.

“So you don’t have the chance to gain any other points, and that’s good news if you’re a team in the top five, with five games to go. No Champions League football will be a kick in the teeth for Chelsea.

FOLLOW OUR MAN UTD FB PAGE! Latest United news and more on our dedicated Facebook page

“Do you think Cole Palmer will be at Chelsea playing in the Europa Conference League? I don’t think so. Manchester United will get into the Champions League, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was playing there next season.”

It comes as Chelsea currently sit sixth in the Premier League table as they head into their final five matches of the season, level with both Brentford and Bournemouth on points (48) but ahead in terms of goal difference.

Considering Liverpool are currently seven points clear of the Blues in fifth, breaking into the top five by the end of the season could be a considerably tough task – while there’s still opportunity for Chelsea to drop down the table by next month’s finale with Sunderland AFC.

Manchester United, on the other hand, have enjoyed a new lease of life under Michael Carrick over the course of the second-half of the season – sitting 10 points clear of Chelsea in third with Champions League football for 2026/27 all but guaranteed.

On the lookout for reinforcement to their engine room this summer given Casemiro will leave the club at the end of the season, the Reds have been linked with a wealth of talent as of recent.

However, if Merson’s opinion is anything to go off, then Palmer could be target No. 1 over the next couple of months, albeit with a systematic rejig given Bruno Fernandes has, as always, thrived in the pocket this term.