Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

Man City rearranged fixtures: When could Crystal Palace and Bournemouth games be played?

Published

on

The Premier League has received pushback in discussions about the rescheduling of two Manchester City fixtures that could prove pivotal to a number of key positions in the table, and the title race with Arsenal.

City’s pursuit of a domestic Treble has also created a fixture headache. After beating Arsenal to the Carabao Cup, Pep Guardiola’s side have once again progressed to the FA Cup final – setting up a clash with Chelsea on Saturday 16 May.

But it now means that City have not one, but two Premier League fixtures that still need to be rearranged – and with just a few weeks of the season remaining. City’s trip to Bournemouth, which fell on FA Cup final weekend, will need to be moved, while the home match against Palace has been without a date for months.

It is up to the Premier League to decide where to schedule both games, and it is a huge decision given how close the title is as City and Arsenal enter the final straight. City could be left with a fixture pile-up that includes four games in 12 days.

Man City’s remaining fixtures

Advertisement

Manchester City have six games left this season, five in the Premier League, plus the FA Cup final. Pep Guardiola’s side currently have a game in hand on leaders Arsenal, due to their progress to both the Carabao Cup and FA Cup finals this season. After City reached the FA Cup semi-finals, where they defeated Southampton on Saturday, their trip to Burnley was rearranged for Wednesday 22 April.

The precedent in the Premier League, however, has generally been for postponed games to be played in the order they were originally scheduled, where possible. That would in this case mean the Palace game happens on Wednesday 13 May and the Bournemouth game on Tuesday 19 May. The latter would be set for that date due to the Europa League final taking place on the Wednesday 20 May, and Uefa disallowing domestic fixtures to be staged when their showpieces fixtures take place.

  • Monday 4 May: Everton (a)
  • Saturday 9 May: Brentford (h)
  • Wednesday 13 May: Crystal Palace (h)*
  • Saturday 16 May: Chelsea (FA Cup final)
  • Tuesday 19 May: Bournemouth (a)*
  • Sunday 24 May: Aston Villa (h)

*TBC

Why Crystal Palace match comes first

Crystal Palace’s participation in the Europa Conference League has complicated rearranging their trip to Manchester City, which was originally scheduled to be played on the weekend of the FA Cup quarter-finals. Palace have reached the semi-finals in Europe and Oliver Glasner’s side will play Shakhtar Donetsk on Thursday 30 April and Thursday 7 May. If the Eagles progress, the final would be after the Premier League season finishes, on Wednesday 27 May, but it means City’s match against them has to be played either immediately after the Brentford match or immediately after the FA Cup final.

Advertisement

The Premier League want the Crystal Palace match to be played before the Bournemouth game, as that was the order of their original calendar. But because the Eagles play their Premier League games following European commitments on a Sunday, that also rules out the prospect of playing on a Tuesday. Therefore, of the two free midweeks, Wednesday 13 May is the leading option, with the Bournemouth match rearranged for the following week, but not on the Wednesday due to the Europa League final. That will involve an English club in either Aston Villa or Nottingham Forest.

City had initially wanted the Crystal Palace match to be rescheduled for Wednesday 22 April, rather than the match against Burnley. It appears this was impossible because Crystal Palace were already scheduled to play West Ham on Monday 20 April, so could not play again that midweek.

‘Tension’ in discussions as Man City face fixture pile-up

The situation could nevertheless leave City playing three games in seven days before the potentially crucial final weekend of the season, with the testing trip to Bournemouth coming a mere three days after the FA Cup final. City have consequently been in dialogue with the Premier League to explore alternative options and swapping the order of the Palace and Bournemouth games, but it is understood that has led to pushback and some tension in discussions. Arsenal are also monitoring developments that could affect the title race.

Advertisement

Any movement could also have repercussions for other positions, as Bournemouth aim for a European place for the first time in their history. If their match against City were to be played on Tuesday 19 May, it would mean nine days’ rest for Andoni Iraola’s side, as they now have a free weekend around the FA Cup final, against a mere three for their opponents. That would also be Iraola’s final home match in charge of Bournemouth, in what is set to be an emotional occasion. Swapping the Bournemouth and Palace games would have allowed City to play on Tuesday 12 May, giving Guardiola’s side an extra day.

Sources with knowledge of the discussions say it has been pointed out that this is just the fairness of how it falls and it is a complication that clubs competing on multiple fronts have to face. City have naturally pointed to the unnecessary pile-up, when alternatives are possible.

This has led to pushback, principally over the idea that individual club situations should not be able to override precedent given how other teams have faced similar in the past. Arsenal sources have pointed to how the 2023-24 title race saw City face a rescheduled away trip at Tottenham Hotspur as their penultimate game, when it could have come earlier, despite an expected media circus around Spurs fans not wanting Arsenal to win the title.

Given their own priorities, Bournemouth currently expect their game against City to be played on Tuesday 19 May, with a likely 7.30pm start. Arsenal are meanwhile set to face Burnley in their own last home game on the night before, a Monday, in a move that is already meeting pushback from fans. The fixtures are anticipated to be announced to over the next 24 hours.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Bundesliga games abroad unlikely, but for how long?

Published

on

After the news that FIFA is set to allow domestic football leagues to play one game a season abroad, German football faces a familiar battle between tradition and growth.

English newspaper The Guardian exclusively reported that new FIFA proposals will allow domestic leagues to have one game a season hosted in a foreign country. The host country will reportedly be allowed to host a maximum of five games from other countries, with the US the favored target.

“I think the German members would object to that and there would be mass protests in the stadium,” Martin Endemann, head of policy at Football Supporters Europe, who advocate for fans on the continent, told DW. “Any football official who would try to do this would have a very, very hard time with those fans in the stadium as well as the members of the respective clubs.”

The discussion of playing domestic league games abroad is not new. Last October, UEFA gave La Liga (Spain) and Serie A (Italy) permission to play a game abroad, but the games were scrapped after local authorities raised concerns. The fallout was ugly.

Advertisement

Germany’s Dortmund invests in Ghana’s emerging players

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

The new FIFA protocol for moving a competitive game abroad would require approval from all major stakeholders, and FIFA would still have the right to reject the switch.

“It is the formalization of something that has been economically inevitable for years,” Dominik Schreyer, a professor of sports economics at Germany’s Otto Beisheim School of Management, told DW.

“Football has been shifting from a locally anchored product to a globally monetized media asset, and once that transition happens, geography becomes flexible,” Schreyer added. 

Advertisement

“FIFA is not leading here, it is reacting under pressure and trying to regulate a development that was already underway through preseason tours and earlier league attempts to stage games abroad. Framing it as one game per season makes it politically digestible, but economically it starts to normalize the idea that domestic competitions are no longer strictly domestic. You could say, the product has already gone global, now the matches are catching up,” he said.

German football structure different to rest of Europe

While many believe such developments have long been an inevitability for clubs in England, Spain and Italy, German club ownership structure differs to other major European leagues, presenting a more complex conversation.

The 50+1 rule essentially guarantees that 50% plus one share of a club’s total shares must be owned by members, ruling out ownership by rich individuals or even nation states. The power of German fans is not to be underestimated, as was recently seen by the failed attempt to secure investment from a private equity partner.

Advertisement

However, if domestic league games abroad become a reality for clubs in Europe, then the Bundesliga will likely return to walking along the familiar tightrope of tradition and growth.

“Financially, the upside exists but should not be overstated,” Schreyer said of playing league games abroad. The example of the National Football League (NFL) in the US playing competitive games abroad is proof of this. Ahead of the first league game in Germany in 2022, the head of NFL Germany said they could have sold over 3 million tickets. Business and finance source BNN Bloomberg explained that when the Jacksonville Jaguars play in London, the team generates roughly $35 to 50 million (€30 to €42.5 million) in revenue each time they play.

“A competitive match abroad carries more commercial weight than a pre-season game because it combines scarcity, sporting relevance and global media attention. As such, a club like Bayern or Dortmund could maybe expect a low double-digit million euro uplift for a match in the US,” Schreyer said, adding that an exact number is hard to come by. Figures released by Sport Bild in late 2025 suggest that Bayern reportedly makes around €5.7 million per home game in revenue.

“This is about positioning, not payday. That becomes even clearer once you factor in compensation for local fans, especially season ticket holders, who would miss out on a high-value fixture at their home stadium.”

Opposed to the idea, but for how long?

Herein lies the major challenge for German football. The tradition that many football clubs are rooted in in Germany, combined with the 50+1 structure, mean that maintaining the local market remains imperative even in the face of football’s global growth.

Advertisement

The DFL (German Football League), the organization that operates the Bundesliga, have publicly spoken out against the idea, and have been as far back as 2018 when Christian Seifert was boss. More recently, Hans-Joachim Watzke, the chairman of the DFL supervisory board and a former Dortmund CEO, couldn’t have been clearer when speaking on the topic.

“As long as I am responsible for this league, there will be no match abroad, when it comes to competitive matches. Full stop,” said Watzke.

Bayern Munich’s CEO Jan-Christian Dreesen is also opposed to the idea, but what if these games become a regular reality for the likes of Manchester City, Paris Saint Germain and Real Madrid?

A Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan gets excited ahead of the game in Munich
The NFL has shown how to take a domestic product and not only market it, but play it across the worldImage: Douglas DeFelice/USA TODAY Network/IMAGO

“For German clubs, the real constraint is cultural,” argued Schreyer. “German football still defines itself through local identity, while competitors have fully embraced global market logic. In the short term, Bundesliga clubs will not fall behind simply by abstaining, because media rights still carry the bulk of revenues. But if others consistently monetize international demand through premium events and German clubs opt out, the gap in global relevance will widen, and the money will follow.”

For Germany, this possibility is only really a concern for a handful of clubs.

Advertisement

“Fans are buying a spectacle, not a league fixture. Nobody will fill an arena in the US for Hoffenheim versus Augsburg. So, this will work for a handful of clubs, not for the league as a whole,” Schreyer said, with Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund the obvious two candidates.

While Bundesliga games being played abroad remains extremely unlikely, pressure will grow if other major clubs do take the step.

Edited by: Matt Pearson

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

‘We had Malinga, then we got Pathirana’: Tabraiz Shamsi shares hilarious ‘final boss’ clip – Watch | Cricket News

Published

on

'We had Malinga, then we got Pathirana': Tabraiz Shamsi shares hilarious 'final boss' clip - Watch

NEW DELHI: South Africa spinner Tabraiz Shamsi sent social media into a frenzy with a hilarious post that perfectly captured cricket’s knack for producing uncanny similarities. Sharing a clip from a local match, possibly played in India, Shamsi highlighted a young boy bowling with a distinctly slingy action, reminiscent of two of Sri Lanka’s most unique pacers.

Watch

Axar Patel shares big update on Mitchell Starc

“We had Malinga.. then we got Pathirana… Meet the final boss now,” Shamsi captioned the video, cheekily extending the comparison to the next generation. The post quickly went viral, with fans amused by how closely the youngster’s action mirrored that of Lasith Malinga and Matheesha Pathirana, both known for their unorthodox, round-arm slinging deliveries.Malinga, a legend of the modern game, built his reputation on a unique low-arm release that made him one of the most feared death bowlers in world cricket. Years later, Pathirana emerged with a strikingly similar action, earning the nickname “Baby Malinga” and carving out his own identity in T20 leagues around the world. The timing of Shamsi’s post coincided with Pathirana’s much-anticipated arrival to join Kolkata Knight Riders in IPL 2026. After days of waiting, the Sri Lankan pacer finally linked up with the squad, offering a ray of hope for a side struggling badly this season. Pathirana’s delayed entry was due to a calf strain he suffered during the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup earlier this year. Following his recovery, he successfully cleared a fitness test conducted by Sri Lanka Cricket and received the necessary clearance to participate in the league. His inclusion had been eagerly anticipated, especially given the hefty Rs 18 crore investment made by the franchise at the IPL auction.While his arrival boosts morale, the team management is expected to take a cautious approach. Pathirana is unlikely to be rushed straight into the playing XI, with the medical staff set to evaluate his readiness over multiple training sessions. The franchise will be keen to ensure he is fully match-fit before exposing him to the rigours of competitive cricket.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Jamie Carragher names the major issue he’s spotted from Arsenal in recent weeks

Published

on

Jamie Carragher said the major issue Arsenal have been dealing with recently is fatigue rather than a lack of mental composure

Arsenal defeated Newcastle United 1-0 on Saturday to return to the top of the table. But the Gunners were the second-best in most attacking stats against the Magpies.

Speaking on Sky Sports’ Monday Night Football, Carragher claimed Mikel Arteta’s men looked leggy against Newcastle and lacked their usual high-pressing intensity. He argued that it was ‘too easy’ for Sandro Tonali and Bruno Guimaraes to dictate the game at the Emirates, which he found ‘worrying’.

Advertisement

“My worry watching Arsenal is not nerves – it hasn’t been for a few weeks – mine is fatigue,” Carragher said. “It was far too easy for Newcastle to make passes and get to the edge of the box. They couldn’t create too much when they got there which is a sign of the Arsenal back four but it looked leggy to me. It was too easy for Tonali and Guimaraes to dictate the game. To see Newcastle play with ease at the Emirates, I thought was a little worrying. It smacked of fatigue for me.”

Meanwhile, the former Liverpool defender insisted that Arsenal are still the best team in the league and attributed their fatigue to fixture congestion, saying they play three games in six days.

Carragher picks game that could cost Arsenal the Premier League title

Speaking further, Carragher said he is worried that the Gunners will throw away their Premier League title hopes when they face Fulham this weekend. For Carragher, the hectic schedule could cost them the title when they face the Cottagers in their next league outing.

“I feel Arsenal have been unfortunate, and I know this playing Champions League semi-finals, when you play Wednesday then Tuesday that’s a big difference between Tuesday then Wednesday,” Carragher continued. “You’re actually playing three games in six days, rather than three games in eight days. It’s a massive difference at this stage of the season.

“That’s why I really worry for Arsenal about this (the Fulham game). You play away and have to travel, Fulham are a good and decent side and then you’ve got to go again on the Tuesday night. They’ve been very unfortunate the way the games have fallen. Three games in six days is really tough.”

Next up for the Gunners is a Champions League clash against Atletico Madrid on Wednesday, April 29.