Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Sports

MLB trends: Paul Skenes’ slump (for him), Guardians’ bullpen problems, more

Published

on

We passed the mathematical halfway point of the season last week and we’re less than two weeks away from the All-Star break. The trade deadline is only a month away. Are the various postseason races any clearer now than they were a month ago? No, not really. That could make swinging deals at the deadline even more challenging because there are fewer willing sellers.

Until the trade market really heats up, here are three trends around the league to keep an eye on as we head into the dog days of summer.

Paul Skenes’ recent rough patch

By any measure, Pirates ace and reigning NL Cy Young winner Paul Skenes is having a fantastic season. Going into Tuesday, he ranked fifth among qualified starters with 2.8 WAR and was second with a 30.6% strikeout rate. His expected ERA, which factors in contact quality allowed (exit velocity, etc.), was second only to Jacob Misiorowski. Skenes has been terrific.

It is also true that Skenes this year has not been quite as dominant as in the last two years. His 3.10 ERA is more than a full run higher than 2024-25, his 2.75 FIP is up almost half a run from 2025, and his overall pitching value per Statcast has slipped from the 100th percentile last season to the 95th percentile this season. Still excellent, obviously, but a step down from 2024-25.

In his last eight starts, Skenes has a 4.40 ERA and 3.45 xERA, and he’s allowed four runs three times. Already three times this year, he’s allowed five runs, and five times he’s allowed at least four runs. Last year, Skenes allowed five runs once and at least four runs only four times. That has prompted a round of “what’s wrong with Skenes?” questions, understandably.

Advertisement

There are two big and pretty obvious reasons 2026 Skenes has been a (slight) step down from 2024-25 Skenes. Let’s examine.

1. Pittsburgh’s defense is awful. The eye test says it and the numbers confirm it. The Pirates, with an outfield full of DHs, have -12 outs above average as a team. Their Defensive Efficiency, which is simply the percentage of batted balls converted into outs, is sixth-worst in baseball at 0.691 (69.1%). The MLB average is 0.700.

The defense has hurt Skenes more than most. Among the 168 pitchers who’ve had at least 100 defensive opportunities behind them, only three have been hurt more by their defense than Skenes.

The Pirates are at -12 OAA as a team, remember, which means they’re at -6 behind Skenes alone and -6 behind every other pitcher on the staff. They’ve channeled half their poor defense behind a guy who’s thrown 12% of their innings. xERA and barrel rate tell us Skenes doesn’t give up much hard contact, yet the Pirates aren’t making plays behind him.

Advertisement

2. There’s some sample size noise with men on base. With the bases empty, Skenes is holding hitters to a .178/.244/.342 batting line. With men on, those numbers jump to .254/.286/.328. This is a new issue. Skenes held hitters to a .187/.257/.251 line with men on base from 2024-25 and that looks a lot like his 2026 numbers with the bases empty.

Because he doesn’t allow many baserunners in general, only about one-third of the batters Skenes has faced this year have come with men on base. Those batters have a .319 batting average on baseballs in play, up from .262 with men on the last two years and his .276 career average overall. In a relatively small sample with men on, more balls have found grass this year.

This ties back to Pittsburgh’s shaky defense. We saw it right in the first inning on Opening Day. Surely you remember this:

It is notable that Skenes has lost velocity. His average fastball has dipped from 98.8 mph in 2024 to 98.2 mph in 2025 to 97.0 mph in 2026. Velocity loss is normal. Most pitchers never throw harder than they do in their first year in the big leagues. The velocity loss only shows up in Skenes’ fastball. It’s not an across-the-board decline, suggesting he may be taking something off to locate better.

Advertisement

Even with the velocity loss, Skenes is getting great results with his fastball. The swing-and-miss and hard contact numbers are not just in line with 2024 and 2025; they’re better. This is the most effective Skenes’ fastball has ever been, really. I understand pointing to the velocity loss and worrying about it, but it’s not the root cause of his recent problems. His fastball’s plenty good.

More than anything, the Pirates have to do a better job catching the ball behind their ace. Playing just below-average defense would be an improvement. The numbers with runners on base scream small sample size weirdness. Skenes showed us the last two years he can dominate in those situations. As long as he’s healthy, and by all accounts he is, I wouldn’t worry about him at all. 

“I’m happy with it overall,” Skenes said about his season to date last week (via MLB.com). “I think it’s been a little bit odd. But in terms of the controllables, I’ve been happy with how I’ve been throwing, and just gonna continue to get better.”  

Cleveland’s uncharacteristically shaky bullpen

For several years now, the Guardians boasted one of baseball’s best and deepest bullpens. By OPS+, Cleveland has not had even a league-average offense since 2022. The formula has been good starting pitching, scratch out a few runs, then smother the other team with the bullpen. It’s worked well for them. The Guardians have won the last two and three of the last four AL Central titles.

This year, things are not quite going according to plan. José Ramírez’s hamate injury has, predictably, been a significant blow. Going into Tuesday, the Guardians were averaging 3.46 runs per game since Ramírez’s injury. It was 4.01 runs per game before that, and even that is well below the 4.49 league average. Cleveland has very little margin of error with this offense now.

To make matters worse, the bullpen is no longer the dominant, best-in-the-league force. It isn’t a bad bullpen by any means, but it’s closer to middle of the pack now rather than elite. Here are the bullpen’s numbers going into Tuesday:

ERA

2.57 (1st in MLB)

Advertisement

3.44 (3rd in MLB)

3.94 (13th in MLB)

xERA

3.38 (2nd)

Advertisement

3.63 (3rd)

4.03 (14th)

K rate (per batter faced)

26.0% (3rd)

Advertisement

24.6% (5th)

26.4% (1st)

BB rate (per batter faced)

8.1% (7th)

Advertisement

8.6% (9th)

9.7% (15th)

HR rate (per 9 IP)

0.75 (1st)

Advertisement

0.81 (3rd)

1.07 (18th)

WAR

7.8 (1st)

Advertisement

6.6 (3rd)

2.6 (11th)

Win probability

14.89 (1st)

Advertisement

8.45 (3rd)

2.69 (7th)

By win probability added, the 2024 Guardians had the best bullpen in baseball history. That was a dominant, suffocating unit that carried a not-quite-league-average offense to 92 wins and an ALCS berth. Last year’s bullpen was not 2024 good, but it was very good, and one of the best in baseball. Manager Stephen Vogt has almost no bad options out there.

This year’s bullpen piles up strikeouts but is middle of the pack everywhere else. xERA, or expected ERA, incorporates exit velocity, and tells us Cleveland’s bullpen is giving up more hard contact this year than in the past. That shows up in the home run rate too. Closer Cade Smith has given up three homers already this year. He gave up five over the previous two years combined.

Advertisement

Last week, Smith gave up home runs on back-to-back pitches to blow a save against the White Sox. The Guardians came back to win that game, but it was the sort of ninth-inning meltdown that a) Cleveland can’t afford with their current offense, and b) is uncharacteristic for Smith, who has otherwise been terrific this season.

The elephant in the room here is Emmanuel Clase, who will almost certainly never pitch in MLB again given the gambling scandal. Clase’s last game was last July 26 and he was a top closer right up until he was put on administrative leave. He’s gone now and that’s one fewer high-end reliever the Guardians have to work with. Clase’s on-field production has been missed.

Without a top-tier bullpen, the plan becomes much harder to execute. Only the Padres average fewer runs scored per game than the Guardians. Whatever leads they can build, the bullpen must make stand up, and the bullpen hasn’t always made things easy this year. Again, it’s a good bullpen. It’s just not a great bullpen, and the Guardians were built around great bullpens for years.

The sudden drop in ‘drag’

Three months into the season, offense has been up and down league-wide. Up and down and then up again, more accurately. It’s easiest if I just show you the numbers:

Advertisement

April

4.51

1.07

.243/.323/.393

Advertisement

May

4.30

1.07

.239/.314/.390

Advertisement

June

4.65

1.29

.249/.320/.419

Advertisement

The league’s home run rate and thus overall offense always tick up in the summer. The weather warms up and the ball flies farther, plus hitters get into midseason form. There’s also attrition on the pitching side. Whenever a pitcher gets hurt, he is replaced by someone who was in Triple-A. A diluted pitching pool contributes to the league’s offensive environment as well.

Offense ticks up as we get into the summer, though it rarely dips in May like it did this year. It dipped significantly. The difference between April (4.51 runs per game) and May (4.30 runs per game) is one run per team every five games, give or take. It’s six additional runs each night across the league for an entire month. It adds up. For whatever reason, offense dipped in May.

It’s also notable that the offensive uptick in June came with a decline in “drag” on the baseball. In English, drag measures how the baseball interacts with the air. When there’s more drag, the ball doesn’t fly as much. When drag is low, the ball carries. The seams on the baseball, how tightly wound the core of the ball is, things like that affect the drag on the baseball.

Right now, drag is at its lowest point since 2019, when all sorts of home run records were set. It wasn’t like this all season. Drag was in line with last season until about mid-May, then it fell off a cliff. The fine folks at Statcast keep tabs on drag. Here’s the data:

Advertisement
Drag on the baseball is at its lowest point since 2019.
Baseball Savant

MLB has not always been the most forthcoming when it comes to the state of the baseball. The league denied intentionally juicing the ball in 2019, then they said any changes to the baseball that season were unintentional, then we learned two different baseballs were used in 2021. Every year, it’s a mystery how the ball, the single most important piece of equipment in the game, will play.

On Wednesday, MLB issued a statement to The Athletic saying there was a recent aesthetic issue related to “excess oil from the yarn inside the baseball,” and added they don’t see any evidence showing this issue is causing the decline in drag. Here is the league’s statement:

In early February, Rawlings notified MLB of an aesthetic issue with the baseballs that shipped for 2026 Spring Training and the Regular Season. In approximately 50% of the baseballs, some excess oil from the yarn inside the baseball filtered through the leather cover of the ball, creating some yellow discoloration. Both Rawlings and MLB’s independent laboratory at UMass-Lowell completed testing on these baseballs, and the baseballs were within specifications and performed consistent with prior years. We notified the Clubs and the MLBPA of the issue in February, and consistent with baseball chain of custody procedures, MLB’s gameday compliance monitors remove any baseballs that show cosmetic imperfections after the pregame mudding process. Rawlings has resolved the issue with the yarn supplier, but due to the necessary lead times associated with baseball production, the balls without the staining will not be shipped to Clubs until late in the 2026 season or early 2027.

MLB makes drag data available to the public on Baseball Savant and we are aware of the recent reduction in drag. To be clear, there has been no change in the materials or manufacturing process of the baseball. Because the baseball is hand-sewn and is made with natural materials, we expect variation in performance both throughout the season and between seasons. Rawlings and our scientists do not see any evidence to date that the yellow staining is related to this change in drag. We will continue to monitor the performance of the baseball as the season progresses.

Every baseball is handmade at the Rawlings factory in Costa Rica (MLB owns Rawlings) and every handmade process will come with variations. Some baseballs have higher seams than others, a tighter core, etc. The league has specification ranges for the baseball and even little variations within those ranges (seam height, etc.) can have a big impact on the way the baseball plays.

Advertisement

Whatever the reason, drag on the baseball has declined these last few weeks, and when drag is down, the ball carries more. We’re seeing that show up in the league’s home run rate. Drag is one of several factors explaining why offense was up last month. Drag, the weather, pitching talent, games in Las Vegas, all that contributes to the state of offense.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Abhishek Sharma vs Virat Kohli

Published

on

Team India will have high hopes from aggressive opener Abhishek Sharma in the five-match T20I series in England, which begins in Chester-le-Street on Wednesday, July 1. The Men in Blue suffered a shocking 2-0 loss in Ireland recently as their famed top order collapsed. As such, Abhishek will be keen to come up with an impactful effort in England.

Abhishek had a mixed time of it during the two-match T20I series in Ireland. He contributed a quick-fire 49 off 20 in the first match in Belfast, smacking seven fours and two sixes. In the second match at the same venue, he was dismissed for a golden duck as Ireland ended up creating history in unexpected fashion.

Abhishek has played 47 T20I innings so far. Ahead of the England vs India clash in Chester-le-Street, we compare his stats with those of Virat Kohli after the former India captain had also played 47 T20I innings.


Abhishek Sharma vs Virat Kohli – Who has a better average and strike rate after 47 T20I innings?

In 47 T20I innings, Abhishek has scored 1,487 runs at an average of 33.04 and a strike rate of 191.62. In six innings against England, he has scored 288 runs at an average of 48 and a strike rate of 214.92. Also, in six innings against New Zealand, he has 234 runs at an average of 46.80 and a strike rate of 248.93. He has also scored 215 runs in nine innings against South Africa (strike rate 169.29).

After 47 T20I innings, Kohli had scored 1,852 runs at an average of 54.47 and a strike rate of 136.37. In 10 innings against Australia, Kohli had 423 runs at an average of 70.50 and a strike rate of 145.36. Also, in six innings against Pakistan, he had 254 runs at an average of 84.66 and a strike rate of 118.69. Further, in nine innings against England, he had 236 runs at a strike rate of 134.09.


Abhishek Sharma vs Virat Kohli – Who has more 50-plus scores after 47 T20I innings?

In 47 T20I innings, Abhishek has registered 12 50-plus scores – two centuries and 10 half-centuries. He clobbered 135 came off 54 balls against England at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai in February 2025. The blazing knock featured seven fours and 13 sixes. He also hit 100 off 47 against Zimbabwe in Harare in July 2024. The innings included seven fours and eight sixes.

Advertisement
Player Runs Average SR HS 100s 50s
Abhishek Sharma 1,487 33.04 191.62 135 2 10
Virat Kohli 1,852 54.47 136.37 90* 0 17

(Abhishek vs Kohli – Batting stats comparison after 47 T20Is)

After 47 T20I innings, Kohli had notched up 17 half-centuries. His best at that stage was 90*, which came off 55 balls against Australia in Adelaide in January 2016. The knock featured nine fours and two sixes. He had also hammered 89* off 47 balls against the West Indies at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai in the 2016 T20 World Cup. The valiant knock comprised of 11 fours and a six.


Abhishek Sharma vs Virat Kohli – Who has a better record in wins after 47 T20I innings?

In 36 T20I wins (35 innings), Abhishek has scored 1,207 runs at an average of 35.50 and a strike rate of 195.94, with two hundreds and eight half-centuries. In nine losses, he has 177 runs, averaging 19.66 at a strike rate of 173.52, with one fifty. The 25-year-old has also scored 61 runs in one tied T20I and 42 in two matches that produced no result.

Player Innings Runs Average SR HS 100s 50s
Abhishek Sharma 35 1,207 35.50 195.94 135 2 8
Virat Kohli 31 1,296 68.21 133.19 90* 0 13

(Abhishek vs Kohli – Batting stats comparison in wins after 47 T20I innings)

Advertisement

In 33 wins (31 innings), Kohli had scored 1,296 runs at an average of 68.21 and a strike rate of 133.19, with 13 half-centuries. In 17 losses (16 innings), he had scored 556 runs at an average of 37.06 and a strike rate of 144.41, with four fifties.


Abhishek Sharma vs Virat Kohli – Who has a better record in chases after 47 T20I innings?

In 20 chases (19 innings), Abhishek has scored 490 runs at an average of 27.22 and a strike rate of 198.38, with three half-centuries. In 28 T20Is while batting first, he has totaled 997 runs at an average of 36.92 and a strike rate of 188.46, with two hundreds and seven half-centuries.

Player Innings Runs Average SR HS 100s 50s
Abhishek Sharma 19 490 27.22 198.38 79 0 3
Virat Kohli 22 1,038 86.50 134.98 82* 0 11

(Abhishek vs Kohli – Batting stats comparison in chases after 47 T20I innings)

In 26 matches in chases (22 innings), Kohli had scored 1,038 runs at an average of 86.50 and a strike rate of 134.98, with 11 half-centuries. In 25 T20Is while batting first, he had 814 runs at an average of 37 and a strike rate of 138.20, with the aid of six half-centuries.

Advertisement