Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Sports

Why Iran’s Goal Against Egypt Was Ruled Out For Offside

Published

on

Iran thought they had scored a dramatic late winner against Egypt in their 1-1 draw at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, only for the goal to be ruled out for offside after VAR review.

The decision immediately sparked debate among fans, with many insisting the goal should have stood because an Egyptian defender appeared to be standing close to the goal line.

However, the controversy comes down to one of football’s most misunderstood rules.

Advertisement

Many fans call it the “last man rule,” but that phrase is misleading.

Offside is not judged by the last defender alone. It is judged by the second-last opponent.

Looking At The Still Image

VAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World CupVAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World Cup
Still image from VAR review showing the offside call that ruled out Iran’s late goal against Egypt in their 1-1 World Cup draw.

From the replay image, several things stand out:

  • Egypt goalkeeper is way off his line
    This is the key detail because the goalkeeper is not the deepest player near the goal.
  • One Egypt defender is almost on the goal line
    This player appears to be Egypt’s deepest defender and closest player to goal.
  • Another Egypt defender is around the six-yard area
    This player becomes extremely important because VAR likely used him as the second-last defender.
  • The circled Iran player is close to both defenders
    This is where the controversy lies because the Iranian attacker appears very close to the defensive line.

How VAR Likely Judged It

The offside decision likely came down to this logic:

  • Deepest Egypt player
    Defender on the goal line.
  • Second-deepest Egypt player
    Defender near the goalkeeper or middle of the six-yard box.
  • Iran attacker position
    VAR then checked whether the Iranian attacker was ahead of that second-deepest Egyptian player when the ball was played.

If the Iranian attacker was ahead of the second-last Egyptian player, even by a small margin, the goal would be ruled out for offside.

Why Fans Were Confused

Many fans looked at the defender near the goal line and asked:

Advertisement

“There is a defender on the line, so how is that offside?”

But one defender behind the attacker is not enough.

For an attacker to be onside, there must usually be two opposing players between him and the goal line.

In most situations, those two players are:

Advertisement

But in this incident:

  • The goalkeeper was off his line
  • One defender was near the goal line
  • The second defender became the key offside reference point

That means the Iranian attacker needed to be behind the second-deepest Egyptian player, not just the defender standing close to the goal line.

Simple Explanation

The goal is offside if the shape looks like this:

Goal line
Egypt defender
Iran attacker
Second Egypt defender

The goal is onside if the shape looks like this:

Advertisement

Goal line
Egypt defender
Second Egypt defender
Iran attacker

That is the main difference.

Even if the attacker is behind one defender, he can still be offside if he is ahead of the second-last opponent.

Why The Decision Remains Controversial

From the still image alone, this does not look like an obvious offside.

Advertisement

It looks extremely tight.

That means the decision likely came down to three things:

  • Frame timing
    The exact moment the ball was played.
  • Line placement
    Where VAR drew the offside line.
  • Playable body parts
    Shoulder, head, torso and legs count, but arms and hands do not.

Even if the Iranian attacker was ahead by just a shoulder, knee or foot, VAR could rule the goal out.

Iran Coach Reacts

Iran head coach Hossam Hassan was left frustrated by the decision after seeing his side denied what could have been a memorable World Cup winner.

He questioned why VAR was introduced to remove controversies if major decisions continue to divide fans and teams.

Advertisement

Iran had pushed hard for victory, and the disallowed goal left players and supporters feeling they had been denied a huge moment.

Final Verdict

The decision may still divide opinion, but the law itself is clear.

A defender standing on the goal line does not automatically keep an attacker onside.

The key question is whether two Egyptian players were between the Iranian attacker and the goal line when the ball was played.

Advertisement

If only one Egyptian player was deeper than the attacker, the offside decision was correct.

That is why Iran’s late goal against Egypt was ruled out despite appearing onside to many fans at first glance.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Belgium Top Group G as Egypt Survive Late Iran Scare to Reach World Cup Knockouts

Published

on

Belgium finished top of Group G at the 2026 FIFA World Cup after a convincing 5-1 victory over New Zealand, while Egypt held on for a dramatic 1-1 draw against Iran to secure their place in the knockout rounds.

Belgium and Egypt both ended the group stage with five points, but the Red Devils claimed first place on goal difference. Egypt finished second, while Iran, with three points, must now wait to see if they can qualify as one of the best third-placed teams. New Zealand were eliminated after losing all hopes of progression.

Belgium went into their final match needing a big win to have any chance of overtaking Egypt at the top of the table, and they delivered in style. The Europeans defeated New Zealand 5-1 to complete a remarkable turnaround after disappointing results in their opening two matches.

  • VAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World CupVAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Advertisement

In Seattle, Egypt and Iran played out a tense and dramatic encounter that kept fans on edge until the final whistle. Egypt took the lead early on, but Iran quickly responded through Ramin Rezaeian after goalkeeper Mostafa Shobeir had saved Mehdi Taremi’s penalty.

The draw appeared enough to send Egypt through, but the Pharaohs were forced to endure a nervy finish. Iran pushed hard for a winner and thought they had found it in stoppage time, only for the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) to rule out the goal for offside.

Iran created several other chances to secure victory but were unable to find the decisive goal that would have guaranteed their place in the last 32.

Advertisement

Egypt also suffered an injury concern after captain Mohamed Salah was substituted in the second half with ice and strapping visible around his left thigh and hamstring, raising fears ahead of the knockout stages.

The final Group G standings saw Belgium finish first with five points, Egypt second with five points, Iran third with three points, and New Zealand at the bottom of the table.

While Belgium and Egypt can now prepare for the knockout rounds, Iran’s World Cup future remains uncertain as they await the outcome of the remaining group-stage matches.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Criticism & panic follow Naomi Osaka after Bad Homburg final as fans question retirement decision

Published

on

Naomi Osaka’s impressive run at the 2026 Bad Homburg Open ended on a disappointing note after she was forced to retire during the final against Karolina Muchova. The retirement sparked mixed reactions from fans, with some criticizing the decision while others expressed concern over her condition.

Osaka had looked back to her best throughout the week, defeating Magdalena Frech, Elise Mertens, Ekaterina Alexandrova, and Wang Xinyu to reach her first final in five years. Standing in her way was an in-form Muchova, who had beaten Irina-Camelia Begu, Clara Tauson, and Elena-Gabriela Ruse to book her place in the title match.

However, the final did not go as planned. Trailing 1-6, 0-1, the former World No. 1 retired after visibly struggling with a foot issue, having also taken a medical timeout during the opening set. Tournament officials did not disclose the exact nature of the injury, with further assessment expected ahead of Wimbledon.

Advertisement

While some fans criticized Naomi Osaka for retiring during the championship match, many others were more concerned about what the injury could mean with Wimbledon just around the corner. One user wrote:

“Auckland 2025 and now Bad Homburg 2026….Her body doesn’t want her to win finals ffs…😭.”

“Expecting to wake up to Naomi ending the title drought but it’s another retirement… i can’t take this no more,” another wrote.

“Man that’s why I hate back to back tournaments, why can’t the tour have a break in between grand slam tournaments to allow players to breathe before a Grand Slam,” one user posted.

“Unbelievable how a professional tennis player can show up to a final and be injured to start the match. Naomi Osaka you should be ASHAMED of yourself. I’m losing thousands of dollars because you are unfit yet still playing,” one user commented.

“This is the worse tennis final ever played. Naomi Osaka you gotta retire from tennis fr fr just go do something like politics or something,” another added.

“I’m sure Xinyu Wang would’ve played a great final against Muchova but Naomi Osaka decided to clown 🤡🤡 f***ing loser,” one account tweeted.


Naomi Osaka apologizes to fans after Bad Homburg Open final retirement

Naomi Osaka pictured at the 2026 Bad Homburg Open | Image Source: GettyNaomi Osaka pictured at the 2026 Bad Homburg Open | Image Source: Getty
Naomi Osaka pictured at the 2026 Bad Homburg Open | Image Source: Getty

Naomi Osaka made sure to apologize to the fans after being forced to retire during the Bad Homburg Open final against Karolina Muchova. During her runner-up speech, the Japanese thanked the crowd for their support despite the hot conditions and expressed her regret at not being able to finish the match.

Osaka said:

“I just want to say thank you everyone that came to the match. I apologize for not being able to finish, but this atmosphere was incredible throughout the whole week. So, thank you so much, and I hope you’re not too hot.”

The four-time Grand Slam champion then congratulated Muchova on winning the title:

“Also, congratulations, Karolina. You’re one of the coolest girls on tour, and it’s always really fun to play you. So, congratulations for an incredible tournament, and I hope you have the best of luck in Wimbledon as well.”

The Wimbledon draw is already out, with Osaka seeded 14th and scheduled to face Elsa Jacquemot in the opening round. However, it remains unclear whether she will be fit enough to compete after her injury scare.

Advertisement