Beyerdynamic has built its reputation making headphones and in-ear monitors for working professionals, spending decades refining products for studio and stage use. It should therefore come as little surprise that the company has introduced a new entry-level model for aspiring sound professionals, the DT 30 IE.
Priced at $149.99, the DT 30 IE brings some of the thinking behind Beyerdynamic’s more expensive DT 70-73 IE series stage monitors to a price point that students, musicians, engineers, and other working users can more realistically afford.
That matters because the professional market has very different priorities from the broader headphone category. While much of the industry continues to push wireless connectivity, ANC, apps, and spatial audio, Beyerdynamic is addressing a more practical problem: professionals still need durable, low-latency wired monitors that can survive daily use and deliver consistent sound without depending on batteries, codecs, or software.
For musicians and engineers, an in-ear monitor is a tool first. Sound quality matters, but so do isolation, fit, durability, and the ability to trust what you are hearing every time you plug in. Expectations are high, even at the entry level, because unreliable monitoring can become a much bigger problem than simply having a bad listening experience.
Advertisement
Related Reading:
Design, Fit & Durability
The DT 30 IE retains the basic shape and appearance of the earlier DT 70-series in-ears, but the earpieces are made from clear polymer rather than the black material used for their higher-end siblings. The cable is also similar in design to the DT 70-series version, with MMCX connectors, memory wires, a chin slider, and a 3.5 mm plug. Once again, color distinguishes the two, with the DT 30 IE sporting a white cable.
The case and accessories are also extremely similar to those supplied with the DT 70 series. A small square clamshell case holds the cable and earpieces separately, along with several sizes of both foam and silicone ear tips.
The overall construction feels purposeful rather than luxurious. This is an earphone meant to be used, packed away, and used again, not displayed. The clear polymer is deceptively tough. I had some initial concerns because I’ve encountered other products with what appeared to be similar construction that broke the first time they were knocked off a desk.
I put the DT 30 IE through a workout, some of it intentional and some accidental, and I can assure readers that the earpieces will survive a drop from table or even ear height. The cable is sturdy as well and should hold up to repeated gigs with reasonable care. Everything about the DT 30 IE suggests that this is an entry-level professional product rather than one designed primarily for consumers.
I selected the largest silicone tips, attached the cable, and prepared to begin my listening sessions, only to run into an issue. The DT 30 IE sits fairly shallowly in the ear, and while I could achieve a good seal when inserting the earpieces, the moment I wrapped the memory wire over my ear, that seal would break.
Advertisement
I tried repeatedly, both with and without my glasses, and never achieved an acceptable seal using the silicone tips. With glasses, it was a complete no-go. Without them, the earpiece would seal initially but pop loose as soon as I moved my head.
Back to the kit I went for the largest pair of foam tips. Those solved the problem, providing a good seal even with my glasses pressing against the memory wires. I also tried an Estron cable and found that it did not create the same issue, allowing me to use the large silicone tips without having to fight with the fit.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Fit is crucial with any in-ear monitor, and the DT 30 IE sounds very thin when the seal is compromised. Because of its relatively shallow insertion depth, some listeners may need to use a larger tip than they normally would to maintain a proper seal. The foam tips also retain more low-end energy than the silicone alternatives, so anyone auditioning the DT 30 IE should spend some time with both before deciding which works best.
Advertisement
Internals & Drive Requirements
The DT 30 IE uses a single 11 mm dynamic driver rather than one of Beyerdynamic’s Tesla designs. Specific details about the diaphragm materials are difficult to come by, with Beyerdynamic describing it simply as a German-designed 11 mm driver.
Nominal impedance is rated at 18 ohms, with a frequency response of 5 Hz to 20 kHz and a sensitivity of 111 dB/mW. Those specifications place the DT 30 IE firmly in the extremely easy-to-drive category, making it suitable for everything from portable recorders and interfaces to phones and dongle DACs.
That high sensitivity does come with a potential downside. Pair the DT 30 IE with an amplifier or source with a higher noise floor, and some background hiss may become audible. There is also very little need for aggressive volume settings here; the DT 30 IE reaches useful listening levels with minimal power.
Specifications:
Type: Wired in-ear monitor
Driver: Single 11 mm dynamic driver
Driver Design: Non-Tesla
Frequency Response: 5 Hz – 20 kHz
Impedance: 18 ohms
Sensitivity: 111 dB/mW
Earpiece Material: Clear polymer
Cable Connection: MMCX
Cable: Detachable white cable with memory wire and chin slider
Source Connector: 3.5 mm
Ear Tips: Multiple sizes of silicone and foam tips
Included Case: Square clamshell carrying case
Listening
The first thing that stands out about the DT 30 IE is its sense of balance. It does not push the bass forward merely to create instant excitement, nor does it chase the exaggerated upper-treble brightness that is sometimes mistaken for detail.
Sub-bass extension is good, but you have to look for it. Tracks that do not emphasize the lowest frequencies can make the DT 30 IE sound somewhat deficient in this region, but recordings with meaningful sub-bass content reveal that it is more capable than first impressions might suggest.
Bass is tight and reasonably deep, with enough weight to give kick drums and electric bass a proper foundation. It is not especially tactile or punchy, but presence and control are both good, which fits the DT 30 IE’s professional focus.
Advertisement
The midrange is its strongest area. Vocals have excellent intelligibility, acoustic guitars retain their texture, and electric guitars have enough edge without becoming abrasive. Strings have good energy without turning harsh, while piano is reproduced with convincing body and clarity.
Treble is clean, moderately detailed, and reasonably extended. Cymbals have definition without sounding tinny, and smaller recording details are generally easy to locate. The tuning is slightly polite in this region, which helps reduce fatigue during long listening sessions or extended set lists.
That does not mean the DT 30 IE glosses over poor recordings. Nasal vocal tones and sibilance are still easy enough to hear when they are present, so the softer treble balance should not be mistaken for an overly forgiving presentation.
The soundstage is fairly intimate, with slightly more width than depth. Imaging benefits from solid instrument separation, and placing individual performers within an orchestral recording is relatively straightforward. Stereo separation is also good, and layered arrangements remain coherent at moderate volume, although some congestion begins to appear as volume increases with particularly dense material.
Advertisement
Overall, the DT 30 IE is especially well suited to vocal-heavy music, small jazz ensembles, acoustic recordings, and live performances. That balance between clarity, separation, and long-term listenability feels very much in line with what Beyerdynamic intended for an entry-level professional monitor.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The Bottom Line
The Beyerdynamic DT 30 IE is aimed squarely at musicians, students, engineers, and working professionals who need an affordable, durable in-ear monitor with balanced tuning and low listening fatigue. Its controlled bass, articulate midrange, and restrained treble make it better suited to monitoring vocals, instruments, and live performances than chasing oversized bass or exaggerated detail.
Fit is the main caveat. Eyeglass wearers may struggle with the supplied memory-wire cable, and some listeners may need foam tips or an alternative cable to maintain a proper seal.
Advertisement
At $149.99, the DT 30 IE is an easy recommendation as a reliable backup for performers already using custom IEMs or Beyerdynamic’s more expensive DT 70-series models. For the gig bag, that kind of inexpensive insurance makes a lot of sense.
Pros:
Balanced, professional-focused tuning
Excellent midrange clarity and vocal intelligibility
Tight, controlled bass
Non-fatiguing treble
Good imaging and instrument separation
Very easy to drive
Durable construction
Detachable MMCX cable
Foam and silicone tips included
Strong value as a primary or backup stage monitor
Cons:
Sub-bass can sound restrained
Limited punch and physical bass impact
Soundstage is fairly intimate
Some congestion at higher volumes with dense recordings
Stock memory-wire cable can create fit issues
Eyeglass wearers may need foam tips or a different cable
High sensitivity may expose hiss from noisier sources
While smartphones won’tstop getting bigger, e-readers seem to be getting smaller. Boox has been at the forefront with one of the most popular small e-readers, the Boox Palma, and now it is adding an even smaller model.
Boox announced the Picco, with preorders opening today. Its screen is just under 4 inches (3.97 to be exact), making it about the size of a playing card. It’s even smaller than the Xteink X4 Pro I tested earlier this year, which has a 4.3-inch screen (but just slightly larger than the 3.7-inch Xteink X3), and considerably smaller than the upcoming Boox Palma 3’s 6.19-inch screen. I liked the size of the Xteink in my hand, but navigating the interface and getting books were challenging, so I’m excited to see another option in that smaller size from a maker with more accessible ebooks (though still not as convenient as a Kindle or Kobo with their built-in stores).
The Picco will cost $100 and is expected to ship in November. I’ll be testing it soon, but in the meantime, here are the details if you’ve been eyeing a tiny e-reader.
An E-Reader for Productivity
Courtesy of Boox
The Boox Picco has a monochrome screen with a resolution of 235 pixels per inch and an adjustable front light that switches between warm- and cool-toned lighting. The microSD card slot supports up to 2 TB of flash memory storage (a 16 GB card is included). There are both a touchscreen and physical page-turning controls, thanks to the buttons on the side of the device. The case has a magnetic ring so you can attach it to the back of a smartphone, though I’ll have to see how well it fits when I test it, as I had mixed results attaching an Xteink to my phone due to both fit and magnet strength.
Advertisement
Courtesy of Boox
Boox says the Picco will have a streamlined operating system focused on reading and digital utility tools. It’s also the first in what Boox calls its Tiles lineup, which is how you’ll access ebooks on this device. You can also use web and USB-C file transfers (the Picco has Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity) to get ebooks onto the Picco. The Picco also has the Pomodoro, Todo, and Countdown apps, so you can use it as both an e-reader and a productivity gadget—handy, and a bigger motivation to keep it attached to the back of your phone even when you aren’t reading.
I’m intrigued to see it in action. Boox’s most popular e-reader could become the Picco over the Palma 3, but we’ll have to wait for both devices to become available to see which is the better buy. Stay tuned for my reviews of both when they come out.
But a Chromium-based design means it can only be so efficient.
Discord
Discord is working on a new mode for its social platform that it says might be less resource-intensive. Screenshots of an option called Game Mode began circulating on social media over the weekend. The description shown for the Game Mode toggle states that it will “Reduce Discord’s CPU and GPU usage while a game is running.” By making the chat platform less resource-intensive, concurrently running software should be able to run more smoothly.
Today, the company confirmed on X that this experimental mode will begin rolling out to its users next week. The brief official announcement about Game Mode added that Discord is “aiming to add more resource-saving features over time.”
Discord is based on the Electron web app framework, which uses Javascript and Chromium for creating software. The open-source Chromium, which is the basis for Google’s Chrome and several other browsers, is not known as the most efficient tool for web development. A feature like Game Mode could offer some performance improvements, especially while also running a beefy AAA game on the same machine, but there may only be so far that Discord will be able to streamline on its current architecture.
Six of the nine independent experts on the advisory board of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism—a consortium run by several of the biggest US tech companies—resigned on Monday, according to a letter seen by WIRED and interviews with three of the people.
The tensions between the independent advisory committee and the GIFCT date back to an email the counterterrorism and free speech experts received in July from Meta’s Nell McCarthy, a vice president overseeing content policy. For years, the group had advised the GIFCT on how to prevent platforms from becoming havens for the radical organizations and individuals blamed for some of the world’s worst mass violence.
But McCarthy wrote that while the consortium welcomed the experts’ insights on violent trends, it no longer desired their scrutiny on the effectiveness of Big Tech’s efforts to curtail violence. Meta and other leaders wanted to “refresh” the 6-year-old independent advisory committee the experts sat on, she wrote. Meta currently serves as chair of GIFCT’s operating board, giving it outsized influence over policy changes, though other companies on the panel must ultimately approve.
New additions to the rotating advisory committee had previously been elected by current members; under the plan laid out in July, they would instead be picked by tech companies. The committee would be barred from weighing in on key topics such as the consortium’s performance and making recommendations together as a group. Its role as a watchdog would be neutered, advisers believed.
Advertisement
In their resignation letter, the departing members of the committee wrote that their appeals against the plan had been “ignored” and that, in turn, they had “lost confidence in the GIFCT’s ability to deliver effectively on its founding mission” to prevent terrorists from exploiting online services. “We all know that a body that cannot scrutinise, take a position, or evaluate is not an advisory body at all,” the letter stated. “It is decoration and accountability theatre.”
Meta deferred comment on the resignations to the GIFCT. An unsigned statement sent to WIRED by a GIFCT spokesperson on behalf of the consortium’s leadership and the Meta-chaired operating board says the proposed changes have been “informed by several rounds of feedback” and are not yet final. They came out of discussions on “how to more effectively engage civil society and governments for substantive input” as “multi-stakeholderism is a core principle” for the GIFCT.
The consortium has about 35 members; other long-time board members include Microsoft and YouTube. A small staff alerts members to violent content, helps them exchange threat intelligence, and commissions research on countering extremism. While the coordination has helped some platforms combat problematic content, critics believe the group isn’t living up to its potential.
A WIRED investigation in 2024 uncovered several issues with GIFCT, including Meta delaying TikTok’s membership bid and poor relations between the companies at the helm and the unpaid independent advisory body. It also revealed failures in the tip-sharing database the consortium oversees to coordinate takedowns of problematic content.
Advertisement
The dismantling of the advisory group threatens to deteriorate the organization’s work further at a time when balancing free expression and online safety has become more challenging. Generative AI tools have simplified content creation but imposed limited guardrails.
The experts who resigned include university researchers and representatives of civil society organizations. They had agreed with McCarthy on the need for changes to improve the results of the decade-old anti-terrorism consortium. But they believe the proposal, which could be finalized soon, amounts to a step backward.
“There won’t be critical voices raising concerns about what GIFCT is doing or is not doing,” one of the departing experts says. “It may seem politically convenient for them to abolish the independent advisory committee, but they are going to regret it in the longer term.”
The successful mission also deployed 26 of SpaceX’s latest Starlink satellites.
SpaceX
For its 14th flight, SpaceX’s Starship powered by its Super Heavy megarocket has entered low-Earth orbit for the first time. SpaceX kicked off this major undertaking early Monday morning but had to deal with some hiccups on the way, including losing one of its six Raptor engines. Ultimately, SpaceX decided to push on with the mission and successfully reached orbit albeit with some compromise.
SpaceX originally planned to have Starship orbit Earth six times over a span of nearly 10 hours for the Flight 14 mission. With one of the engines offline, the plan changed to only spend approximately three hours in orbit before reentering the Earth’s atmosphere and landing in the Pacific Ocean. As part of the same mission, SpaceX managed to deploy 26 of its Starlink V3 satellites into orbit. SpaceX said that its Starlink team has made contact with all newly-deployed 26 satellites in orbit, which will eventually be used to improve Internet speeds for customers. While previous Starship missions also carried several V3 satellites, they only remained in suborbital space and served as test flights to see if the new satellites would connect to the existing Starlink constellation.
While Starship’s flight 14 marked a major milestone of reaching orbit, the mission also served as a test of the reusability of its Super Heavy rocket. After providing the necessary boost to Starship, Super Heavy landed in the Gulf of Mexico, where it will eventually be retrieved, but not by a launch tower‘s “chopsticks” as previously demonstrated.
Mipmapping is a good way to add a lot more detail to a 3D scene without overburdening the rendering hardware with detail that won’t be seen by the user. This level-of-detail rendering technique was demonstrated on the N64 console hardware a few years ago by [James Lambert] with [Michael Biggins], also known as [PhonicUK], now demonstrating it on the ESP32-S3 using his own Jet rendering engine.
Although level-of-detail rendering really speeds things up, it does also require far larger texture sizes, with [James]’s N64 demo taking up 40 MB of a 64 MB cartridge. To fit it on an ESP32-S3 with 16 MB of PSRAM and no SD card expansion or such the textures were further compressed to use 8-bit indexing, resulting in a mere 5.01 MB of textures.
There’s a demonstration video over on the associated Reddit thread, which shows the camera moving through the scene. Even if not as exciting as the Wipeout port by [Michael] that we previously covered, it does make clear that even without a proper 3D GPU the ESP32-S3 is already a pretty capable gaming machine that can go toe-to-toe with some 1990s consoles.
There are five weeks left until the midterm elections, and extremism is on the ballot in much of the US. A WIRED review of candidates running for statewide and federal positions in November, along with exclusive data on candidates running for state-level positions, reveals hundreds of Republican candidates who openly express virulently hateful ideologies, share racist content online, have close ties to white supremacist and antisemitic figures, and are members of far-right groups online. President Donald Trump and his administration have openly embraced, endorsed and defended many of these candidates.
At a local level, over 500 candidates running for state legislator positions in November are members of far-right groups on Facebook that promote militias, gun rights, and Christian nationalism, according to data collected by the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights and shared with WIRED.
“The candidates are taking a page out of the Trump administration’s playbook,” Luke Baumgartner, a former research fellow at George Washington University’s Program on Extremism, tells WIRED. Baumgartner claims that many of the candidates running in November have been inspired by those in the White House. “In essence, the executive branch has handed them a permission slip to say and do what would have been unthinkable during the George W. Bush, McCain, or [Mitt] Romney eras of the GOP,” he says.
Advertisement
Extremist rhetoric has led to real world political threats. In 2025, terrorism and targeted violence incidents rose 19 percent compared to 2024, according to researchers at the University of Maryland; the US Capitol Police reported an increase in “threat assessment cases” against members of Congress for the third year in a row, with a 58 percent increase from 2024; and the US Marshals Service documented threats against almost 400 judges, a roughly 5 percent increase from the previous year.
Here are five races involving candidates who have shared extremist ideologies or have close ties to extremist figures, that WIRED is watching ahead of the November midterms.
The Texas Railroad Commissioner Race
Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images
Bo French, the GOP candidate for Texas Railroad Commissioner, is so extreme that Republican strategist Karl Rove has said he would vote for a Democrat rather than supporting a “bigot.”
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Roborock Qvero 2 Pro: 30-second review
The Qrevo 2 Pro is the latest robot vacuum and mop combo cleaner from Roborock and includes detachable mop plates to help ensure it doesn’t get carpets wet while cleaning.
Cleaning performance is a match for some of the most expensive options on the market with its mopping being as good as I have ever tested making it a fantastic pick for the price.
Advertisement
It is relatively tall so it can’t clean under low furniture and its hard floor cleaning isn’t flawless but it is an excellent option, especially when on sale.
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
Advertisement
Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro: price & availability
List price: $799.99 / £649.99 / AU$1,199
Launch date: August 2026
Availability: worldwide
The Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro sits right on the line between premium and mid-range robot vacuums, with a list price $799.99 / £649.99 / AU$1,199. However, almost immediately after launch I have already seen it get a significant discount to $549 / £549.99, tipping it firmly into the more affordable category — especially considering the features and performance.
Even at full price it sits below the Roborock’s Curv models and produces similar results (although it doesn’t have the AdaptLift chassis for getting over higher thresholds between rooms) making it an excellent value pick. If you’re looking to spend less, the Roborock Q7 is a good alternative although it has much lower suction power and doesn’t have an auto-empty dock.
A branded floor cleaner compatible with the Qrevo 2 Pro is available on Roborock’s website but they don’t push this hard and after testing it without it, it’s definitely not required.
You don’t have to use Roborock’s own floor cleaner, but you will need to buy disposable dust bags (Image credit: Future)
What you will need to buy are disposable dust bags as these are thrown away once full. A three-pack costs $39.90 in the US, and a six-pack is £31.99 in the UK, so this needs to be considered in the running costs. I have tested Roborocks with cheaper unbranded dust bags in the past and not encountered problems, but check model compatibility before ordering.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Advertisement
You can also buy replacement brushes, mop pads, filters and other parts in case anything breaks.
Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro review: design
Smart-looking robot and dock
Can’t get under low furniture
Smart home integration
Available in all white or black (currently only available in white in the UK and Australia) it is pretty unfussy in terms of design with the dock a bit squarer than the slightly bulbous base stations of Roborock’s Curv series.
The robot is circular, measuring 14 inches wide with a 6-inch cleaning opening underneath for picking up dirt.
The lidar scanner the robot uses to navigate sits in a cage on top of the robot, increasing its height and reducing its clearance so it won’t be able to vacuum under low furniture like a sofa, unlike Roborock’s Qvrevo CurvX with its retractable lidar scanner.
Advertisement
Image 1 of 2
The robot’s lidar scanner doesn’t retract, so it can’t fit under low furniture
(Image credit: Future)
The dock is easy to set up, provided you have sufficient space
(Image credit: Future)
Setting the dock up is easy, involving just attaching the ramp to the front of the dock, filling the clean water tank and plugging it in. The more difficult part may be finding a place for it as it needs to sit on a hard floor with at least 1.5 inches either side and 27.5 inches of clear space in front of the dock. It also needs to be within reach of a power socket and somewhere you won’t trip up over it or mind looking at it everyday.
Set up is simple, you will need to find an appropriate spot for the dock on a hard floor with plenty of space either side. You then download the app, pair the robot and then you can send it on a discovery run around your house to build a map.
Once it has scanned the space you can then edit the map to combine or divide spaces into rooms, mark areas as no-go zones, manually designate floor types and mark things like curtains and furniture. I found that aside from ensuring the rooms are divided correctly I didn’t have to make any changes to get it to work well, with the carpeted areas successfully detected.
Advertisement
The robot has detachable mop pads, which it leaves in its dock after mopping your floors (Image credit: Future)
After setup you can use the app to kickstart cleans of the whole map, one or more selected rooms or a designated zone clean you can mark on the map. As well as ad hoc cleans you can set routines for different types of cleans from deep intensive cleans, to specific after dinner cleans of smaller zones or light maintenance vacuuming without mopping.
As the Qrevo 2 Pro has detachable mops, rather than vacuuming and mopping room by room it first goes around the carpeted areas of the whole space you are cleaning first. Once that is complete it returns to the dock to reattach the mop heads before cleaning the rest of the hard floors.
Obstacle detection was generally good, though the Qrevo 2 Pro did get caught on a USB charging cable (Image credit: Future)
Cleaning performance is OK on hard floors, although it can lead to some spreading of larger debris as the edge cleaning arm sent rice grains skittering across the floor. It did better with fine particles, although there was still some tea visible on a pass on the standard cleaning settings.
It handled larger particles much better on carpet, picking up almost every single grain of rice, although there was some tea left after the first pass.
Advertisement
As with most robot vacuums, its edge cleaning wasn’t great on carpet, but the sweeping brush does well to move material into the vacuum’s path on hard floors..
During the obstacle avoidance tests it did well to identify the shoe and sock, staying clear as it cleaned around them but it did go over the charging cable, getting it stuck in the cleaning brushes and needing me to rescue it before it could continue cleaning.
During my mopping tests on first pass it did a reasonable job taking up a fair bit of the ketchup although there was a hint of the soy sauce remaining. Trying a second clean on maximum water flow and cleaning settings it did a fantastic job cleaning off even the dried on patches of ketchup.
While the most intensive cleaning took some time and left the floor relatively wet, it was some of the best mopping I have ever seen from a robot. You do need to delve into the settings to get the best performance and it probably is only practical for small zone cleaning but it’s still a lot less effort than getting out a mop and bucket.
Advertisement
On regular cleaning settings it can manage around five regular rooms before needing recharging so depending on your home it may need to recharge before completing a full clean. Recharging takes around four hours.
It’s not loud in operation, registering around 60db while cleaning on carpet. The dock emptying is a little louder, topping out at 69db (around the level of normal conversation), although this is pretty brief so shouldn’t be too disruptive.
The Qrevo 2 Pro uses dust bags so emptying it of dirt is quick and neat, although that does add ongoing costs to using it. You will also need to empty the waste water and refill the clean water tanks regularly which is easy to do (as long as you leave enough clearance room above the robot) as these lift out of the dock and then can be unclipped open for emptying or filling.
Smart home integration worked well for starting a whole house clean but I did have a little trouble using the room clean function for custom named rooms. Naming a room one of the default names such as Kitchen or Living Room worked fine, but a custom name such as Utility Room sparked a whole house clean instead.
Advertisement
While custom room names would be helpful, even getting default room cleaning to work is not a guarantee with any of the robot vacuum cleaners I have tested so, relatively, this is a success.
Performance score: 4.5 out of 5
Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro: app
Easy setup
Clear house map
Can set frequent types of clean and schedule cleans
The app is simple to use, although I did find it can sometimes get a little lost if you select your cleaning mode too quickly, meaning you have to move to another mode and back again before getting the options you need.
Once you select the robot you are shown the map of your home and have four tabs to select the type of clean you want, ‘Full’, ‘Room’, ‘Zone’ and ‘Routine’. ‘Full’ starts a clean of the whole map and to the left of the play button there is a button for adjusting the type of clean including whether you want to vacuum and mop, just vacuum or just mop. There are also controls for the level of suction, waterflow, amount of times you want the robot to clean the area and the intensity of the cleaning pattern.
Image 1 of 4
The app is simple to use provided you don’t hop between modes too quickly
(Image credit: Future)
Select your robot to see a map of your home
(Image credit: Future)
You can adjust the settings for the vacuum and mop independently
(Image credit: Future)
The ‘Routine’ option allows you to schedule different types of cleaning
(Image credit: Future)
Room allows you to select one or more rooms to clean, while Zones lets you pick multiple rectangular sections of your chosen size on the map for it to clean, allowing you to spot clean specific sections of floor.
‘Routine’ is the final option and allows you to create shortcuts for regular types of clean that will then be available from the opening screen on the app. This is useful for setting up things like zone cleans that focus around a dining table following a meal or if you want a predefined deep clean compared with a light maintenance clean.
Advertisement
Despite the name, ‘Routine’ doesn’t include any scheduling functionality by default. That is hidden somewhat in the settings menu, but can be used with scheduled cleans (if your home doesn’t regularly have bits of Lego on the floor like mine does).
Should you buy the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro?
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Attribute
Notes
Advertisement
Score
Value for money
Even at full price the Qrevo 2 Pro represents good value and at a discount price it is a fantastic deal. You will need to consider the price of disposable dust bags in the running costs but you’ll be hard pressed to find these features and performance for less.
5/5
Advertisement
Design
The design is more focused on function than form but it is unfussy and designed to fit into most homes. The tall mounting of the lidar scanner will stop it from cleaning under low furniture.
4/5
Performance
Advertisement
Vacuuming performance is good and mopping is excellent although It did have trouble picking up on a charging cable in our object avoidance tests leading it to get stuck.
4.5/5
App
The app makes it easy to control, with simple options for choosing the type and location of cleans as well as a clear map of your home.
Advertisement
5/5
Buy it if
Don’t buy it if
Advertisement
How I tested the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro
I tested the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro over a period of over two weeks, using it as an everyday cleaner of a busy household.
As well as day to day use I put it through a series of tests, assessing its performance picking up fine particles and larger debris on carpet and hard floor by having it clean an area with a set amount of rice and tea sprinkled on the surface. Edge cleaning was also tested using tea on the edge of a carpet and hard floor area.
Mopping performance was tested by having the robot clean up a spill of soy sauce, as well as tackling a patch of dried ketchup. After an initial pass on regular settings, this was then retested with cleaning settings set to maximum.
The forthcoming iPhone Duo has more features than Apple has revealed, including a whole series of faces for its StandBy mode. Here’s what to eventually look for.
While pre-orders for iPhone Duo don’t start until October 16, and the Xcode betas still don’t show developers everything, one has found many new options coming to iOS 27 for this device.
Developer pdfu reports that the Xcode 27.1 simulator is lacking Rushmore, an app that is for displaying the new StandBy faces. But despite that, they have managed to get certain of the new faces running.
Here’s a deep dive into StandBy mode on iPhone Duo.
Rushmore, the app meant to host the redesigned faces, is missing from the iOS 27.1 simulator.
Advertisement
But its localization strings reveal unreported faces, and I got some new faces running in the current renderer. pic.twitter.com/lDQHOy5R0e
These working ones are variants on familiar clock and calendar faces as used on the iPhone‘s current StandBy mode. But code references describe several more options.
Here’s a deep dive into StandBy mode on iPhone Duo.
Rushmore, the app meant to host the redesigned faces, is missing from the iOS 27.1 simulator.
Advertisement
But its localization strings reveal unreported faces, and I got some new faces running in the current renderer. pic.twitter.com/lDQHOy5R0e
Just because something is referenced in code, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it will launch immediately. But those code references show five more faces:
Home Camera: up to nine camera views
Home Module
Flow
Fade
Snoopy
There are no details for Home Modular, Flow, or Fade. But the code for Flow also includes the term ResponsiveArt, which suggests that it will at least be an animated face.
Face editor
The iPhone Duo will also feature a revised editor for customizing these StandBy faces. It’s very similar to the existing one on iPhone and is perhaps more like the Apple Watch face editor.
Advertisement
Users can swipe left and right to adjust, for instance, the style of an analog clock, its numerals, light mode and dark mode, plus the color of the face and the hands.
Some of these clock faces also have room for two widgets. Then some more are digital instead of analog and there pdfu has found code references for five layouts:
StandBy
Stacked
Top
Middle
Bottom
The presumption is that all but the StandBy one may actually be intended for when the iPhone is opened like a book.
Developer pdfu has a strong track record for examining beta code. They confirmed that the iPhone Duo would use Touch ID, for instance, and most recently uncovered that Siri could be replaced by Claude or ChatGPT.
The JadePuffer ransomware operator is targeting Azure tenants with agent-driven attacks that conduct reconnaissance, steal credentials, and destroy core components.
The malware emerged in July, with researchers at cloud security company Sysdig highlighting that it uses AI agents to automate the entire attack chain, from reconnaissance, credential theft, and lateral movement to persistence and data encryption.
Shortly after, the company noted that JadePuffer expanded its focus to AI assets, training datasets, and vector databases, using a tool called EncForge.
Microsoft Security Research observed two JadePuffer attacks in June that mapped cloud resources, retrieved storage account keys, and deleted Azure Storage accounts.
Advertisement
The destructive stage lasted seven minutes and targeted more than 100 storage accounts, as well as Key Vaults, Function Apps, Virtual Machines, and App Services.
Although the threat actor was able to delete most of the targeted Azure Storage accounts, some remained unaffected because of Azure resource locks and storage account-level protections.
Microsoft tracks the JadePuffer threat actor as Storm-3168 and says it used two compromised service principals – security identities that enable applications, hosted services, and automated tools to authenticate to Azure and access assigned resources.
Both service principals belonged to the same tenant. One was used for reconnaissance and resource discovery, while the other “performed discovery, destructive operations, and credential collection.”
Advertisement
Timeline of observed attacks Source: Microsoft
The attacker removed backup and recovery protections (Azure Site Recovery locks), indicating an effort to make restoration more difficult.
This operational pattern could further support ransomware extortion, although Microsoft did not report anything about financial demands and didn’t confirm data theft in the observed cases.
According to the researchers, attempts to delete Azure SQL databases failed because the attacker used an unsupported API version. Attempts to remove recovery protection locks also failed.
“The parallel targeting of Azure SQL databases and storage accounts suggests an effort to broaden the destructive impact across different data services rather than concentrating on a single resource type,” Microsoft said.
Roughly half an hour after the wipe attempts, Storm-3168 returned to perform more than 30 requests for storage account keys, most of which succeeded.
Advertisement
Microsoft could not determine exactly how the initial access occurred, but noted that credentials for one service principal appeared in a public GitHub issue before the attacks.
The researchers recommend several mitigation steps and guidance for system administrators, including activating cloud workload protections, checking for secrets in public repositories, and evaluating Azure RBAC permissions against least-privilege principles.
Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.
Snapdragon Summit in Maui, Hawaii, has come and during the show, Qualcomm (who paid for my travel and accommodations) announced two new top tier phone processors. They are the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 and the Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. The former is the successor to last year’s flagship while the latter is a new even more premium tier of performance.
Both chips run off of two 5GHz prime cores and six 4GHz performance cores built on a 2nm process. The key differences between the two include Matrix cores included in the Extreme’s GPU, additional video processing (8K/60fps) on the Extreme, and more. For the average consumer, you probably won’t notice a ton of differences between the two in day-to-day tasks, but when it comes to gaming, AI (agentic AI was a key theme at the conference), and sustained performance, that’s when you’ll notice the difference.
According to Qualcomm, the reason for the two premium tiers stems from phone maker demand. Consumers have been vying for more premium options in the smartphone space, and these chips are designed to address that need. Speaking of phones, there were two major phone announcements at Snapdragon Summit. The Xiaomi 18 Pro and Pro Max will run the Elite and Extreme processors respectively. The Motorola Signature 27 will also run the Extreme chip, and both of those phones are exciting for different reasons.
Advertisement
Motorola Signature 27 brings Motorola back into flagship territory
Adam Doud/SlashGear
Motorola’s Signature series of smartphones have typically been reserved for overseas sales only, with no presence in the U.S. That looks to change with the Signature 27, which will get a North American release. The Signature 27 is peak Motorola flagship material — Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, a six-antenna design, a 200-megapixel telephoto lens, and Bang & Olufsen audio, which was recently announced.
Those specs all sound great, but it’s mostly just great to see a Motorola flagship on U.S. shores again. Motorola has been doing very well with its flip phones and midrange candybar phones, but it’s been a while since a real flagship came to the States, so that alone is worth celebrating. That’s especially true in light of OnePlus’s exit from the U.S. market — there’s another premium flagship taking its place, and it looks like a real beast. Stay tuned to SlashGear for more news about the Motorola Signature coming — hopefully — soon.
Advertisement
Xiaomi 18 Pro and 18 Pro Max split the difference
Adam Doud/SlashGear
Xiaomi is a phone that will not come to the U.S., though it will likely be relatively easy to import if you so choose. The 18 Pro series brings a boatload of great specifications to the table, and it also represents the diversity that Qualcomm was talking about. Both phones have similar specifications and capabilities, and they also bring a couple of neat features to the lineup as well.
The first is the rear-facing screen. Picture an iPhone 18 Pro, and replace the camera island with a rear facing screen. You can use this for taking selfies with the main cameras, but Xiaomi will also bring some apps and functionality to the rear screen as well. The options we could play with were limited to things like answering calls, playing music, and some AI-generated animals, which were admittedly pretty cute, but not terribly functional.
Advertisement
The other cool thing, and honestly the thing that excites me the most, is the privacy display. This works basically the same as the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra’s display with pixels that turn off, and software that runs the whole thing. Xiaomi re-did the subpixels a bit, which is supposed to give better color even with the privacy display on, and it was not terribly noticeable, but it’ll take more experimentation to determine. But I mainly like the idea that someone else beyond Samsung is making this feature. Hopefully it’s only a matter of time before it catches on with more phone makers.
.jpg)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login