Elon Musk’s reach spans multiple global industries, placing the billionaire (sometimes trillionaire, depending on the stock market) at the center of the electric-vehicle industry, space exploration, artificial intelligence and national politics. He’s already involved in telecommunications through his company SpaceX and its global satellite internet service, Starlink, but recent developments may soon expand his influence with satellite-to-cellular coverage.

SpaceX announced on X Thursday that it has agreed to acquire nationwide 800 MHz low-band spectrum to help build Starlink Mobile into a major US cellular carrier. By acquiring these low-band airwaves, SpaceX said it aims to improve signal propagation, allowing satellite coverage to bypass physical obstacles like building walls, dense foliage, and hilly terrain

“This is the last critical piece of the spectrum puzzle needed for SpaceX to provide complete phone coverage in America,” Musk posted on X.

A SpaceX representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Under the terms of Thursday’s announcement, SpaceX will acquire investment firm Grain Management’s nationwide 800 MHz low-band spectrum portfolio for an estimated $8 billion. The deal gives the satellite operator up to 14 megahertz of paired airwaves, enabling two-way data transmission between satellites and mobile devices. The acquisition remains subject to approval by the Federal Communications Commission, which has not yet set a timeline for a decision.

Acquiring the low-band spectrum is crucial for Starlink Mobile’s cellular ambitions. Unlike the high-frequency beams used currently, these low-band airwaves possess the physical properties required to pierce concrete walls, dense foliage and urban infrastructure, effectively solving the indoor dead zone problem that has long limited satellite-to-phone connectivity.

Also this week, the FCC gave SpaceX the go-ahead to launch 15,000 satellites, which the company said can deliver more than 100 times the bandwidth of its current satellites. These satellites are direct to device, meaning that they can transmit phone calls, texts and other data straight from space to devices on the ground. SpaceX said the new satellites will bring “high-speed service directly to unmodified devices anywhere in the world.”

What does it mean for consumers?

For people looking for an alternative to the big three cellphone carriers AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless, Starlink Mobile could eventually be an option.

If and when the FCC approves the deal with Grain Management, Starlink Mobile will combine its newly acquired low-band spectrum with a massive, freshly approved fleet of 15,000 next-generation satellites. This hybrid network will use a mix of satellite beams and ground infrastructure to penetrate walls and eliminate indoor dead zones across the US while leveraging its high-bandwidth frequencies to deliver high-speed data directly to ordinary mobile devices. SpaceX plans to accelerate deployment of the new system next year.

But according to analyst Tim Farrar, an industry expert with research firm Telecom, Media and Finance Associates, simply acquiring low-spectrum bandwidth in this week’s deal won’t be enough to compete strongly against AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless, which uses thousands of cellphone towers.

“It’s still a very limited amount of spectrum, and to get reliable building penetration in urban areas, SpaceX would have to deploy towers on the ground,” Farrar told CNBC.

Last month, T-Mobile’s chief financial officer, Peter Osvaldik, dismissed the idea that Starlink’s satellite-to-cell service could adequately compete with the traditional wireless coverage offered by the major carriers. “It’s not a competitive threat,” Osvaldik said at the Global TMT Conference.

“By the time the signal has gotten to your phone, you have no signal strength left,” he added. “You can have a million satellites up there with all the spectrum in the world, you can’t break the fundamental laws of physics.”

Ever since being admittedly fascinated by the Cambridge coffee webcam from the 1990s, I’ve written about VPNs, the NFL, smartphones, living wages, over/unders and everything in between.

See full bio

PC shipments saw a steep drop of about 20 percent in Q3 2026, analysts reported this week.

The industry saw its “sharpest decline since “Q1 2023,” Omdia said in an announcement toady. Global shipments of laptops, desktops, and workstations fell 21.2 percent year over year (YoY) to 58.1 million devices, the analyst said.

Desktop PC shipments (including desktop workstations) decreased 23.5 percent to 11.7 million units, and laptop shipments (including laptop workstations) declined 20.6 percent to 46.4 million, per Omdia.

IDC shared similar findings. The analyst said this week that PC shipments fell 20.1 percent YoY to 62.7 million units, compared to 78.5 million in Q3 2025.

Advertisement

The industry also shipped 9.1 percent fewer PCs in Q3 2026 than it did in Q2 2026, when 68.2 million units shipped, per IDC.

The 20.1 percent YoY decline is the biggest drop that the IDC has ever recorded during a year’s third quarter, the IDC said, per PCMag.

The drop in shipments is also notable considering that Q3 PC shipments usually surpass Q2’s numbers.

“If looking at all quarters, then we have seen other quarters in recent years with larger declines, such as 2022 Q4, which was -28.2 percent, and 2023 Q1, which was -28.7 percent. Both were coming off pandemic highs,” Jitesh Ubrani, research director for consumer devices at IDC, told PCMag.

Advertisement

In its announcement this week, IDC said that many PC vendors and sales channels stocked up on PC shipments earlier in the year in anticipation of memory price hikes. That meant minimal demand remained during Q3.

“[Sales] channels are now worried about carrying too much inventory into a market where high prices are suppressing demand,” Ubrani said in a statement.

PDFBear is a broad browser-based PDF toolkit that covers common jobs such as converting, merging, splitting, compressing, signing, and organizing files without installing desktop software. Its standard tools can be useful for occasional PDF work, but the free-plan limits, cloud file handling, Premium-only AI features, and a few unclear product details are worth understanding before you upload important documents or pay.

This is a research-based review, not a hands-on performance test. The verdict therefore focuses on what PDFBear currently offers, what its published policies say, where those policies create practical trade-offs, and which claims cannot be independently confirmed from the available evidence.

Is PDFBear Worth Using?

PDFBear is worth considering for occasional browser-based PDF work because its standard toolset covers many everyday tasks without requiring a paid subscription. The current free plan includes standard conversion, merge, split, compression, and signing tools, with files up to 50 MB.

The main question is not whether PDFBear has enough tools. It does. The more useful question is whether its operating model fits the documents you handle.

If you mainly need to convert a Word document, combine a few PDFs, compress an attachment, rotate pages, or sign a document from a browser, the free tier may cover the job. A registered free account currently supports unlimited conversions with up to 30 pages or images per conversion, while guests are limited to five conversions per day with up to 10 pages or images each.

Premium becomes more relevant when you need optical character recognition (OCR), AI document tools, larger page batches, priority processing, or longer file availability. OCR is the technology that turns text inside scanned pages into searchable and selectable text.

The biggest caution is privacy rather than basic functionality. PDFBear is an online service, so documents are uploaded for processing instead of remaining entirely on your computer. That does not automatically make the service unsuitable, but it matters if the file contains information you would normally avoid sending to a third-party cloud service.

How This PDFBear Review Was Researched

That distinction matters because feature availability does not prove quality. A service can offer PDF-to-Word conversion without that establishing how accurately it reproduces a difficult document. Likewise, PDFBear advertises priority processing for Premium users, but that does not provide an independent benchmark for how much faster it is.

Independent review evidence is also limited. G2 currently shows six PDFBear reviews with a 2.4 out of 5 average. Six reviews can surface individual experiences, but the sample is too small to support a broad conclusion about reliability, support quality, or typical user satisfaction.

What PDFBear Can Do

PDFBear is more than a single converter. Its current tool catalog covers conversion, organization, optimization, editing, signing, security, OCR, and AI-assisted document work.

The standard tools include familiar jobs such as converting Word, Excel, PowerPoint, images, and other formats to PDF; converting PDFs back to common formats; merging and splitting documents; compressing files; rotating or organizing pages; signing PDFs; filling forms; and applying basic document-security tools. PDFBear says these standard tools are available without Premium.

The service also includes more specialized tools such as OCR, Chat with PDF, summarization, translation, and a PDF question generator. These are materially different from a normal file conversion because some depend on artificial intelligence and are reserved for Premium accounts.

That separation is useful when deciding whether you actually need a subscription. Someone who occasionally merges invoices and converts Office files has a very different workload from someone extracting text from hundreds of scanned pages or asking an AI system to summarize long reports.

PDFBear operates through a web browser, so its core tools do not require desktop installation. That cross-device convenience is one of the service’s clearer strengths, especially when you move between computers or only need a PDF tool occasionally.

PDFBear Free vs Premium: Limits and Pricing

The free plan handles routine PDF work, while Premium mainly raises processing allowances and unlocks OCR, AI features, batch processing, priority service, and an ad-free experience. The distinction is easier to understand when the limits are placed side by side.

PDFBear currently offers a 7-day Premium trial and a $99.99 yearly plan. Its FAQ also lists a $13.99 monthly option. Prices and promotional terms can change, so check the checkout page before subscribing.

There is an important qualification behind the word “unlimited.” Standard Premium tasks may have no daily conversion limit, but PDFBear’s AI features remain subject to fair-use controls. The Terms describe per-file page limits, a monthly AI allowance, a maximum upload size of 50 MB per file, and restrictions on automated or unusually high-volume processing.

Premium is therefore better understood as a higher-capacity individual plan than an unrestricted bulk-processing service. If your workflow is automated, shared across many people, or processes unusually large numbers of documents, a normal Premium account should not be assumed to cover it.

Warning
!PDFBear’s official documentation currently conflicts regarding watermarks on free conversions. Its pricing page lists watermark-free PDF output as a Premium-only feature, and its developer documentation states that free conversions receive a small “PDFBEAR.COM – Free Ver.” badge. Conversely, its FAQ states converted files carry no watermark. If clean, unbranded output is essential for client-facing documents, portfolios, or resumes, run a sample test on the exact tool before relying on the free tier.

Because those first-party statements conflict, do not assume one rule applies uniformly to every free website workflow. Testing your specific file path beforehand prevents unexpected formatting revisions when submitting time-sensitive files.

How PDFBear Handles Your Files and Privacy

Uploading a PDF to an online converter means the document leaves your device for processing. For routine files that may be an acceptable trade-off for convenience, but sensitive documents deserve a closer look at storage, deletion, sharing, and AI processing.

Files are transferred through encrypted HTTPS connections while moving between your device and PDFBear. HTTPS protects data in transit, but it is not the same as an independent guarantee that no security incident can occur.

For a free account, a file is removed 30 days after its last activity. Downloading the file or opening its share link counts as activity and resets that timer. Premium files remain available while the subscription is active and are removed 30 days after the subscription ends.

Signed-in users can also delete files manually from the file manager. PDFBear’s Privacy Policy states that uploaded and converted files may be stored on S3-compatible infrastructure such as Wasabi or Amazon Web Services.

Sharing creates another consideration. A shared page is configured so search engines should not index it, but anyone who has the share link can view the file until it is deleted. A no-index setting reduces search-engine discovery; it does not restrict access to one named recipient.

AI tools add another data path. When you use Chat with PDF, summarization, translation, the question generator, or other AI-assisted functions, relevant file content or text may be sent to a third-party AI provider to generate the result. Ordinary conversion should not be described as the same process simply because AI tools are available elsewhere on the service.

If a document contains confidential business information, identity documents, medical information, financial records, private legal material, or another category your organization restricts from external AI services, that distinction matters. Follow the applicable data policy rather than assuming an online AI feature is suitable because the underlying website uses HTTPS.

PDFBear states that human review is not part of its normal automated document-processing workflow. That is a provider statement about its operating practice, not an independent security certification, so it should not be treated as proof that every possible privacy or security risk has been eliminated.

Where PDFBear Falls Short

The first limitation is structural: PDFBear is primarily an online workflow. If your requirement is that a confidential document never leave your own computer, a remote processing service is the wrong model regardless of how convenient its interface may be.

The 50 MB per-file ceiling can also become restrictive with high-resolution scans, image-heavy reports, design files, or long archives. Premium raises the number of pages or images allowed in a conversion, but the current Terms still cap an uploaded file at 50 MB.

Premium’s AI tools also come with limits behind the headline feature list. OCR, Chat with PDF, summarization, translation, and the question generator are included with Premium, but AI usage has monthly and per-file fair-use controls. Heavy AI users should not interpret Premium as unlimited automated document analysis.

There is also no basis for promising flawless output. PDFBear’s Terms state that conversions and AI outputs are not guaranteed to be error-free and advise users to keep backups of important files. That matters most for complex tables, uncommon fonts, scanned text, forms, and intricate layouts, where a converted result should be checked before you rely on it or discard the original.

Free-output watermarking remains unclear because PDFBear’s own current pages disagree. If an unbranded PDF is essential to your workflow, confirm the result with the specific free tool before relying on it repeatedly.

Independent review evidence is too limited for a strong reliability verdict. G2 currently lists only six PDFBear reviews. That is enough to justify reading individual complaints or praise before subscribing, but not enough to establish how the service performs for most users.

PDFBear Alternatives

The most useful alternative depends on why PDFBear does not fit. Replacing it with another cloud converter does not solve much if your actual concern is keeping documents off third-party servers.

If your main task is Merge PDF, compare free PDF merger tools by processing location, free-use restrictions, offline support, and document controls. That comparison is more useful than paying for a broad PDF suite when combining files is the only job you regularly perform.

If you still want another browser-based conversion and editing service, CocoDoc PDF Converter is another option to evaluate. The important comparison is not simply which site has more tools. Check the current free limits, processing model, privacy policy, pricing, and the exact functions you need before moving a sensitive or repeated workflow.

For documents that must stay local, prioritize an offline desktop application or a browser-local tool whose processing genuinely occurs on your own device. Dedicated desktop software such as PDFgear or open-source editors like LibreOffice Draw process files entirely on local hardware without sending document bytes across the network. Choosing a true offline tool or a client-side WebAssembly processor changes the privacy model far more meaningfully than switching between two competing cloud converters.

Who Should and Shouldn’t Use PDFBear

PDFBear is a reasonable fit for people who occasionally need common PDF tasks from a browser and do not want to install dedicated desktop software. The free account is especially relevant when your files stay below 50 MB and your conversions fit within the current 30-page or image allowance.

Premium makes more sense when OCR, AI document tools, batches of up to 200 pages or images, priority processing, or longer file availability are part of your regular work. Even then, the AI fair-use policy should be checked if you expect unusually heavy use.

PDFBear is a weaker fit if you require local-only processing, routinely work with files above 50 MB, need independently benchmarked conversion accuracy, or plan to automate high-volume PDF processing through a normal consumer Premium account.

It also deserves extra scrutiny when the documents are highly sensitive. The service publishes information about HTTPS, retention, deletion, storage providers, and AI subprocessors, which gives you useful policy details to evaluate. Those disclosures still do not remove the basic fact that an online workflow transfers document data to external infrastructure.

If your decision comes down to privacy, start with the data rather than the tool list: identify what the document contains, whether external processing is permitted, whether an AI feature is involved, and how soon you need the result removed. That will usually tell you more than a long feature comparison.

Verdict

Canadian cybersecurity executive Edward Dubrovsky has been arrested in Pennsylvania in connection with alleged extortion activity that multiple reports have linked to the FBI’s ongoing crackdown on the ShinyHunters hacking group.

Dubrovsky, 54, has had senior roles at cybersecurity firms that help data breach and ransomware victims negotiate extortion payments with cybercriminals.

Yesterday, FBI Director Kash Patel announced that agents had arrested “another suspected co-conspirator of the ShinyHunters group”.  The New York Times reported that the suspect was a Canadian citizen arrested in Pennsylvania and believed to be a primary co-conspirator in the recent ShinyHunters FBI Jobs hack.

Last night, both Politico and KrebsOnSecurity reported that Dubrovsky was arrested in Pennsylvania, where he was attending a cybersecurity conference.

Publicly available court records show that Dubrovsky appeared in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after being taken into custody. A later court order says he was transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, where the charges were filed, with the order stating that he remains in custody.

While the complaint is currently under seal, the docket lists conspiracy and extortion-related charges.

“18:371 AND 1030(a)(7)(B) – CONSPIRACY TO THREATEN TO IMPAIR THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION WITH THE INTENT TO EXTORT MONEY; 18:1951(a) AND (b)(2) – INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREATS (HOBBS ACT EXTORTION AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT HOBBS ACT EXTORTION),” reads the case docket.

While the FBI has not publicly confirmed that Dubrovsky is the suspected ShinyHunters co-conspirator, KrebsOnSecurity reports that multiple sources linked Dubrovsky’s arrest to the ShinyHunters investigation.

Dubrovsky previously co-founded Canadian cybersecurity company CYPFER and has also been associated with CyberSteward, another firm specializing in ransomware negotiation and cyber-extortion response.

Politico reports that CyberSteward is a trade name used by CYPFER and that the firms help organizations negotiate and send extortion payments to cybercriminals.

Dubrovsky also recently published a book, “Cyber Extortion Strategic Response,” about handling cyber extortion.

According to KrebsOnSecurity, Dubrovsky had previously posted on LinkedIn that he planned to attend the NetDiligence Cyber Risk Summit in Pennsylvania with the CyberSteward team.

ShinyHunters is an extortion group known for stealing data from web applications and cloud-based SaaS platforms, then demanding ransom payments from victims or the stolen data would be published.

Over time, the ShinyHunters name has been used by numerous threat actors involved in data theft and extortion campaigns worldwide.

In addition to conducting its own breaches, the group has also operated as an extortion-as-a-service operation, helping other hackers extort organizations they had already compromised into paying ransom demands.

More recently, ShinyHunters has increasingly targeted cloud environments and enterprise SaaS platforms, often using stolen credentials, authentication tokens, phishing, and social engineering to gain access to corporate systems and steal data.

According to the FBI, ShinyHunters and associated actors have breached more than 140 organizations and collected more than $70 million in extortion payments over the past year.

The FBI has stepped up pressure on the group since the breach of its jobs portal, with multiple arrests and detentions linked to alleged ShinyHunters members in recent weeks.

Because the complaint against Dubrovsky remains sealed, it is still unclear what he is accused of doing or whether the case is connected to the FBI breach.

Join Mikko Hyppönen and security leaders from the NFL, CHANEL, and Atlassian for a two-hour digital summit on what AI-speed attacks change, what defenders should stop doing, and how to validate, decide, fix, and re-validate at machine speed.

Save your seat

3D scanners are useful for everything from reverse engineering and automotive work to creating digital models of physical objects. However, many professional scanners still rely heavily on a connected computer, which can make scanning large objects or working in the field more cumbersome. To address this problem, Creality launched the Sermoon P1S. The scanner has onboard processing, 256GB of storage, and a 6-inch touchscreen, letting users capture objects, check scan coverage, and do common processing tasks without constantly connecting to a computer.

Four Scanning Modes & High-End Hardware

The Sermoon P1S combines 34 cross laser lines, seven parallel laser lines, a blue laser line, and NIR structured light. These modes are designed for different types of objects and surfaces. The 34 cross laser lines focus on larger surfaces, while the seven parallel lines target finer details. The single blue laser line can help capture recessed areas such as grooves and deep holes. NIR structured light is designed for smaller and medium-sized objects and detailed surface capture.

For blue-laser scanning, Creality claims up to 0.02mm accuracy, with volumetric accuracy of 0.02mm + 0.08mm/m. Blue-laser scanning reaches up to 60fps in standalone mode and 100fps when connected to a PC.

The scanner weighs 807 grams with its battery and runs on an 8-core Qualcomm CPU clocked at up to 3.36GHz, an Adreno 740 GPU, and an FPGA. It also has 16GB LPDDR5X RAM and 256GB UFS 4.0 storage. Users can operate the scanner independently or connect it to a PC wirelessly or through USB 3.0. Wi-Fi 7 enables wireless connectivity, while two replaceable 3,300mAh batteries and PD 3.0 fast charging support longer scanning sessions. The P1S can also operate outdoors, with blue-laser scanning supporting environments up to 110,000 lux. With the included NIR filter, NIR scanning supports up to 80,000 lux.

Creality’s software supports scanning, optimization, and basic model processing, with support for STL, OBJ, and PLY formats. It also includes AI-assisted hole filling to help repair missing surfaces. Users can then move the resulting models into CAD, 3D modeling, or fabrication software. Creality says it will continue updating the scanner through OTA updates. The Creality Sermoon P1S is available worldwide from September 22, 2026, through the Creality Store. It normally costs $2,299, but an early-bird price of $2,099 is available through October 12, offering a $200 discount.

Keep track of important updates without having to open the app every two minutes.

Using Live Activities on CarPlay

Adnan Ahmed for Engadget

Apple could add a personal touch to its upcoming iPhone Duo launch, letting buyers see their names on the screen the first time they turn on their new phones. According to Bloomberg journalist Mark Gurman, Apple retail stores in the US will have a system to customise the device’s initial greeting, so it displays a message such as “Hello, Mark” instead of the usual generic welcome.

The feature is expected to be exclusive to the iPhone Duo and limited to the US, with support for English and Spanish. It is a small change, but one that could make unboxing a new iPhone feel a little more personal.

Apple is adding a personal touch to the iPhone Duo experience

The custom greeting is a small software detail, but it fits Apple’s broader approach of making its products feel personal from the moment users start using them. Instead of seeing the same welcome screen as everyone else, buyers could see their own names appear during the initial setup.

According to Gurman, the feature will be available only at Apple retail stores in the US, and only on the iPhone Duo. Customers can choose between English and Spanish. Apple has not announced whether the personalisation will extend to online orders or other iPhone models.

The feature is also a reminder that Apple’s first foldable iPhone is being treated as a special launch. The iPhone Duo opens into a 7.6-inch display and has a 5.4-inch outer screen when folded. Apple has positioned it as a device for multitasking, gaming, and watching content, rather than simply a conventional iPhone with a hinge.

iPhone Duo starts at $1,999 in the US

The timing is notable because Apple’s first foldable iPhone is approaching its retail launch. The company says US pre-orders begin on October 16, with availability starting October 23. The iPhone Duo starts at $1,999 for 256GB, with higher-capacity versions costing more.

The device opens into a 7.6-inch inner display and has a 5.4-inch outer screen when folded. Apple is pitching it as a device for multitasking, gaming and watching content, combining the flexibility of a larger screen with a phone-sized design.

For US buyers considering a $2,000 phone, a personalised greeting will hardly be the deciding factor. Still, it is a memorable flourish for a product that marks Apple’s entry into the foldable-phone market. The bigger questions remain how well the folding design holds up, how useful the larger display proves in everyday use, and whether buyers think the price is justified.

For now, the name-on-screen feature remains an unconfirmed retail detail. Apple has yet to explain exactly how stores will set it up or whether the option will expand to other devices.

RELATED COVERAGE:

[This is a sponsored article with MDEC, but the editorial team had full control over the content. ]

If you haven’t been living under a rock, you’d know that Malaysia is now at the centre of Southeast Asia’s AI infrastructure boom.

New data centres are continuously being announced across Johor and the Klang Valley, with the most recent ones being China’s Alibaba and Singapore-based Digital Decarbonization Solutions Platform (DDSP). 

As more and more global technology firms expand their cloud and AI capabilities here, it’s easy to get awed by the billion-ringgit investment flowing into our digital economy. These investments also reflect Malaysia’s growing strengths under the Malaysia Digital (MD) national strategic initiative, which is accelerating the development of a robust digital and AI ecosystem.

But have you ever wondered why Malaysia is chosen for these expansions?

Out of all our SEA-blings, why Malaysia?

Today, Malaysia is one of the few countries in the Southeast Asia region that has built something worth betting on before the hyperscalers arrived.

NationGate, a Penang-based manufacturer, had spent years quietly qualifying for one of NVIDIA’s most exclusive global partnerships. They’re currently one of only four companies across all of Asia that have earned the right to assemble NVIDIA’s most advanced AI servers. 

Similarly, SNS Network in Cyberjaya is making high-performance GPU computing accessible to businesses that would otherwise struggle to afford the hardware themselves.

MDEC’s Founders Center of Excellence (FOX) programme has also assembled a cohort of high-growth Malaysia Digital (MD) status software companies, giving them the strategic support to scale, expand regionally and contribute to Malaysia’s growing AI ecosystem.

So how does each layer actually work? Let’s break it down.

The hardware layer: Building the machines that power AI

You probably won’t see NationGate’s name on your AI tools, but their systems run on the infrastructure the firm helped build.

Founded in 2010 by Datuk Ooi Eng Leong and his wife Tan Ah Geok, NationGate started as a general electronics manufacturing services provider before pivoting into AI server assembly. That pivot proved timely. 

As demand for AI infrastructure accelerated worldwide, NationGate emerged as one of its beneficiaries. In just 2024 alone, the firm’s revenue reportedly surged from RM638 million to RM5.27 billion, an increase of more than eightfold.

Beyond the NVIDIA partnership, what makes NationGate’s position defensible is its operational depth. The company assembles servers using NVIDIA’s H200 and B200 AI GPU chips—among the most sought-after in the world—and ships them primarily to Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand. 

It also offers servers using the older H100 chips and Intel rack servers, positioning NationGate to serve both cutting-edge AI workloads and more cost-sensitive enterprise deployments. This diversification is highly important as AI infrastructure demand continues to expand faster than supply can keep up.

The access layer: Putting GPU power within local (and global) reach

As one of Malaysia’s leading ICT distributors and super server suppliers, SNS Network is far from a new player in the AI boom.

The Ipoh-founded company built its name in the local tech supply chain as a distributor of hardware and servers to businesses. But as competition in AI server distribution grew, SNS Network shifted its focus into GPU-as-a-Service (GPUaaS).

Called SNS AI Factory, it’s a fully managed AI cloud infrastructure service built with NVIDIA and Dell Technologies. Instead of buying expensive hardware, companies can rent computing power for workloads across industries like financial services, healthcare, retail, manufacturing, and telecommunications. 

Its GPUaaS also addresses another challenge facing AI adoption: data sovereignty.

For banks, hospitals, and government agencies, sensitive data often cannot be freely stored or processed overseas due to regulatory and security requirements. By keeping the infrastructure in Malaysia, companies can easily overcome these barriers to adopting AI.

Pricing starts at around RM35,000 per GPU per month, as SNS Network aims to offer more companies access to AI infrastructure without large upfront costs. “[This] allows (companies) flexibility to scale their computing needs on demand,” stated its Managing Director, Ko Yun Hung.

The intelligence layer: What gets plugged in

Hardware alone doesn’t build an AI economy. Data centres and GPU clusters are only the foundation. What matters is what gets built on top of them.

That’s where Malaysia’s MD status ecosystem and the MDEC Founders Centre of Excellence (FOX) programme come in. An invitation-only initiative, FOX provides Malaysian companies with strategic support, investor access, and regional expansion opportunities to scale up.

Three MD status companies show how this plays out.

Glem.ai tackles the deployment gap. Its AI platform helps large organisations, regulated industries, and government users scale AI deployments without being locked into a single vendor. 

This addresses the practical roadblocks that often prevent AI projects from moving past the pilot stage. As its CEO, Ryan Tay, puts it plainly: “Our focus has always been on solving the real barriers that stop enterprises and institutions from deploying AI at scale: data sovereignty, governance, and production reliability.” 

Since its launch last year, the company has won the Talent Innovation Award at ITEC 2025 in Beijing, showing what’s possible when local innovation is nurtured with the right support and opportunities to scale internationally.

On the other hand, DeltaSpike addresses the blind spot that tends to get discovered too late. As AI becomes more integrated in critical business workflows, it also becomes a target. This gap is what DeltaSpike aims to fill with its Agentic SOC: an intelligence-drive, automation-first security operations model designed to proactively contain security threats.

“Our goal is to embed intelligent, proactive protection into the DNA of business growth. This investment serves as a mandate to accelerate Malaysia’s cybersecurity capability while providing a robust security anchor for Southeast Asia,” shared its Chairman,Taufik Othman.

DeltaSpike’s vision has since attracted institutional backing. In April 2026, DeltaSpike secured a strategic investment from VentureTECH to accelerate its capabilities and regional expansion across Southeast Asia.

Last but not least is Cloud Space, a cloud and AI infrastructure solutions provider focused on helping businesses deploy scalable digital systems across regional markets.

As Malaysia’s 2025 Google Cloud Country Partner of the Year, Cloud Space helps enterprises modernise legacy systems, migrate to cloud infrastructure, and deploy AI-enabled applications at scale.

Google Cloud’s President of Global Partner Ecosystem, Kevin Ichhpurani, commended the firm in 2025, stating, “Cloud Space’s commitment to delivering innovative cloud solutions and measurable outcomes for clients has made a significant impact over the past year.”

More than the sum of its parts

Taken on their own, NationGate, SNS Network and MD status companies Glem.ai, DeltaSpike, and Cloud Space are already strong stories. But what makes Malaysia’s position interesting is how they connect.

Each layer feeds the next. Easier access to GPU infrastructure lowers the barrier for enterprises to experiment with AI, which drives demand for local AI applications. As adoption grows, it increases the need for more computing capacity underneath. 

Over time, this builds a full ecosystem that continues to attract foreign investment, accelerate AI adoption and reinforce Malaysia’s position as a regional digital hub.

As Malaysia’s AI ecosystem continues to grow, the capabilities being built today will help advance the aspirations of Malaysia Digital 2030 (MD2030) while laying the foundations for Malaysia’s vision of becoming an AI Nation by 2030.

• Learn more about MDEC and the MD Status here.

Featured Image Credit: NationGate / Pixabay

Turkey will bar social media platforms from serving children under 15 from 1 November, under rules published in the country’s Official Gazette, Inci Ozbek reported for Bloomberg.

Platforms must check users’ ages when they sign up, using a token from Turkey’s e-government system. Anyone found to be under 15 must be blocked.

Existing accounts must be checked by 31 March 2027, and those held by under-15s shut down.

Strict limits for older teens

Accounts for 15 to 17-year-olds will be private by default and filtered. They cannot show personalised ads or offer livestreaming, and platforms must block screenshots of them.

Teens can only message accounts they already follow, and endless scrolling feeds must be switched off, Daily Sabah reported.

Parents must get tools to manage settings, limit screen time and approve purchases.

The rules cover platforms including Instagram, Facebook, X, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord and Reddit, Daily Sabah said.

Fines of up to 3%

Firms that break the rules face fines of up to 3% of global revenue, ad bans and cuts to their internet bandwidth under Turkey’s internet law.

Parliament passed the law in April, a week after a school shooting.

Turkey joins a growing list of countries trying to keep children off social media. Australia led the way, but its under-16 ban has struggled with enforcement.