Connect with us

Tech

5 Essential Apps Every Samsung User Should Know About

Published

on

Most Samsung Galaxy users download apps from the Google Play Store, but that’s not the only place to find useful apps. Samsung has its own store, called Galaxy Store, which provides apps created especially for the Galaxy smartphones. These apps can make your smartphone work faster, let you use additional camera options, and give you more customization options for your device. In this article, we look at five essential apps every Samsung user should know about and why they’re worth trying.

1. Good Lock

samsung app good lock

Good Lock is Samsung’s own customization app for Galaxy smartphones. With Good Lock, users get access to various settings that aren’t available in the default One UI interface. Rather than installing a third-party launcher to change your smartphone, Good Lock lets you personalize various aspects of your Galaxy device through official Samsung applications. Here are some of the most helpful modules from Good Lock:

  • Home Up: The Home Up module provides additional settings for the home screen. In particular, it allows users to resize folders, choose new layouts, use stickers, and activate looping for home screens.
  • Camera Assistant: With the Camera Assistant module, users can control extra features of the Samsung camera app. These include activating a 2x zoom shortcut, changing shutter button actions, and accessing such Samsung camera features as Single Take and Dual Recording.
  • One Hand Operation+: This module makes large Galaxy phones easier to use with one hand. Users can create custom swipe gestures, open an app switcher, and access quick tools with simple movements.
  • QuickStar: QuickStar lets users personalize the Quick Settings panel. It also allows them to hide selected status bar icons, change the panel’s appearance, and adjust the button layout.
  • Routines+: This is an expanded version of Samsung’s Modes and Routines feature. Users can create more automations and touch macros for daily tasks.
  • MultiStar: The MultiStar module provides more efficient usage of split-screen mode. Also, it enables additional cover screen features on Galaxy Z Flip models.

2. Good Guardians

Good Guardians is another helpful Samsung app that can be downloaded from the Galaxy Store. Similar to Good Lock, it comes with a number of downloadable modules. However, while Good Lock enhances customization options, Good Guardians helps enhance your phone’s performance and optimize its battery usage. These are some of the most helpful Good Guardians modules:

  • Battery Tracker: This module shows which apps have used the most battery over the last 24 hours or seven days. It also displays battery usage percentages and screen time for each app.
  • Battery Guardian: It provides users with a number of options to increase battery life, such as enabling power-saving mode at bedtime, optimizing display, and minimizing network usage for chosen apps.
  • Galaxy App Booster: This feature boosts app performance at just one click. According to Samsung, it should be run once a week and after any software update.
  • Thermal Guardian: The feature allows you to check your smartphone’s temperature and tells you why the phone heated up. Moreover, it monitors CPU utilization and lists apps that use maximum resources.
  • Memory Guardian: This tool clears unused RAM with one tap, helping free memory and improve overall performance.
  • Media File Guardian: It allows you to control media files stored on your phone, including files created by banking, shopping, and social media apps.

3. Expert RAW

Expert RAW

For Galaxy smartphone users who want professional-grade control options for their camera, Samsung provides Expert RAW. Though it can be used with the Camera app, it is not automatically downloaded from the start. The user will need to install it either from the Galaxy Store or the More tab of the Camera app.

The app targets photography enthusiasts who want greater control over their camera settings. With this application, users can change settings such as ISO, shutter speed, focusing, exposure, and more before capturing images. Images can be captured using the app in two different file formats: JPEG and RAW. Certain Galaxy flagships offer functions such as astrophotography and multiple-exposure images. Expert RAW is available only on selected Galaxy flagship models, so it may not appear on every Samsung phone.

4. Galaxy Enhance-X

Galaxy Enhance-X is Samsung’s AI-powered editing app designed for Galaxy devices. It makes image and video editing easy regardless of your level of expertise. Its one-click improvement capability ensures you don’t need advanced knowledge to edit your images.

Along with AI enhancement, the app includes tools to eliminate shadows and reflections, enhance facial features, crop photos, and adjust brightness. Users can also restore vintage photos and even create GIFs. Video editing functions encompass cutting videos, muting the sound, and applying various video effects.

Advertisement

Other options include plugins such as FilmStyle, Cinematic Glow, SkyGuide, and SpeedShuffle, which offer additional editing options. But please keep in mind that the available features may differ depending on the Galaxy model.

5. Edge Panel Apps

samsung apps edge panel

Samsung’s Edge Panel gives Galaxy users quick access to apps and useful tools from the side of the screen. The feature already includes shortcuts for apps, contacts, weather, reminders, clipboard, and other utilities. Galaxy phones include several built-in panel options, but users can expand them with additional downloads.

The Galaxy Store offers additional Edge Panels that add more functionality. The Galaxy Store offers additional Edge Panels that add more functionality. Samsung provides panels such as the Calculator Panel, Calendar Panel, Edge QuickNotes, and Direct Call Panel. The Calculator Panel lets users perform quick calculations without opening the Calculator app. The Calendar Panel displays a scrollable calendar, while Edge QuickNotes makes it easy to view or create notes. With the Direct Call Panel, you can make a call from your contact list with just one tap. Third-party Edge Panels are also available on Samsung through the Galaxy Store. These panels offer additional options that let users perform daily tasks without opening apps.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Apple warns of supply issues despite ‘strongest June quarter’

Published

on

Q3 revenue for 2026 stood at $109.4bn, up 16pc year-on-year.

Outgoing Apple CEO Tim Cook has warned of potential supply issues for iPhones and other Apple products in the months ahead despite the company reporting what Cook called its “strongest June quarter ever” yesterday (30 July).

A more cautious than anticipated outlook for Q4 – revealed on a conference call with analysts and investors following the publication of Q3 results – forecast growth of between 9pc and 11pc, less than the analyst benchmark of more than 12pc.

Apples shares fell by around 7pc last night on the back of the forecast.

Advertisement

Third fiscal quarter revenue for 2026 stood at $109.4bn, up 16pc year-on-year. Sales for iPhones came in at $54.3bn, Mac computers at $10.4bn, iPads at $6.2bn and wearables at $7.9bn for the three months ending on 27 June.

“We continue to expect high levels of demand. However, with less flexibility in the supply chain, we expect the impact from the supply constraints to increase significantly sequentially,” Cook said on the call.

“The DRAM market has three suppliers. Obviously, if there were more suppliers, that would be good, and it would help us on the supply side and perhaps the pricing side. It’s unclear on the pricing side, but it could help on the supply side. And so we’re evaluating all options.”

He said that beyond September, the market pricing for memory would continue to rise, resulting in “an increasing impact on our business”.

Advertisement

He equated the current surge in the cost of and demand for memory chips to a “100-year flood”, while also noting that demand for Apple’s phones and computers was currently even higher than anticipated.

“It’s an incredibly strong iPhone and Mac product cycle that has really yielded a demand beyond our expectation,” he said.

Last month, Apple raised prices on a variety of its product lines. At the time, a company spokesperson told news publications that “rapid expansion of AI data centres has created an extraordinary surge in demand for memory and storage”, adding that Apple has “never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly”.

Earlier this week, the company launched a new leasing service for devices including iPhones, Macs, iPads and Apple Watches. The company posted its “best March quarter ever” three months ago, driven largely by demand for iPhones.

Advertisement

On 1 September, Tim Cook will be replaced as CEO by John Ternus, the company’s current senior vice-president of hardware engineering.

“There is so much opportunity for us with everything that’s happening in this space, and we’re just really focused on our plans and very excited about it,” Ternus said during yesterday’s earnings call.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

D&D Rolls a Natural 20 on Nerd Collabs, Announcing World of Warcraft and Star Wars Sets

Published

on

Today, I can play a game of Dungeons & Dragons around the table with my friends where humans, elves and orcs battle in campaigns of fantasy adventure. But the best-known tabletop roleplaying game in the world is moving beyond its own universe. Soon, dice-rollers all over will be able to play pen-and-paper versions of World of Warcraft and Star Wars with official D&D rules.

On the opening night of GenCon, the massive annual tabletop gaming convention in Indianapolis, D&D creator Wizards of the Coast announced the news during its keynote at the grand Indiana Repertory Theater. These two partnerships are the first in the new Universes Beyond line and, just like the identically named series from Magic: The Gathering, will fold creative universes from other companies into D&D. 

By the end of the year, players can buy the core World of Warcraft rulebook and make their own adventures with features from the popular massively multiplayer online RPG that fit in the D&D system. They’ll be able to build their own characters from species and classes who can meet (and fight) iconic heroes and villains from the online game, each built out in D&D rules to be compatible with adventures in its own or any other setting that uses D&D’s D20 system. The D&D team unveiled a series of books and products that can be preordered now and will debut on store shelves in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Advertisement

“One of the lovely things about D&D is it comes alive with your imagination, and to be able to take some of the world of Azeroth and World of Warcraft and allow players to create their adventures based on a world they’ve loved and known — or maybe they’re just getting introduced to through D&D — that was the focus,” said Holly Longdale, executive producer and vice president of World of Warcraft.

Blizzard’s game is the first crossover foray, and sometime next year, players will be able to run D&D games in the Star Wars universe, too — but Wizards has been far more tight-lipped about what’s coming from a galaxy far, far away. They want to let the Warcraft expansion have its time in the sun as the first release of Universes Beyond, with plans to reveal more about the Star Wars expansion in the months to come.

“The [D&D] team is very excited for all the opportunities that Star Wars has to offer, and we’re really hoping to bring a lot of joy to the fans with the things we’re going to be offering,” said D&D product architect Laura Hohman. 

The GenCon 2026 roadmap for the next year of D&D content.

After 50 years of Dungeons & Dragons, this is a new chapter

The launch of Universes Beyond is just one part of a new direction for D&D, which is looking to the past as well as the future. Dan Ayoub, senior vice president and head of the D&D franchise, opened the keynote with a promise to increase transparency for upcoming projects and releases, including annual roadmaps unveiled at every GenCon. 

Also announced on stage are upcoming collaborations with legends from D&D’s past as part of the franchise’s Icons series. Luke Gygax will assist with new content from Greyhawk (one of D&D’s first settings that was created by his father, Gary Gygax), Tracy Hickman and Margaret Weis will come back for Dragonlance and R.A. Salvatore will return for Legends of Drizzt, after the drow ranger from Forgotten Realms.

Advertisement

After 50 years of D&D, comes another first: the return of Dark Sun, a post-magical-apocalypse setting originally released in the early 1990s, now resurrected as the tabletop game’s first mature release. Grim wonder abounds in D&D’s trial run on making a more adult setting full of blood, violence and survival that the presenter on stage claimed is so explicit, they have to shrink-wrap the source book and slap a warning label on it.

A row of people on stage, each of which had taken part in the D&D keynote during GenCon 2026.
At the end of the D&D GenCon 2026 keynote presentation, every presenter came up for a bow.David Lumb/CNET

A new chapter means new tech, and D&D showed off a couple of updates coming for the company’s online resources. D&D Beyond, the online character-builder and resource portal, will soon get a tool called Look For Group that will work like a Yelp list for games being run by hobby shops and other providers. The D&D Beyond mobile app is also getting an overhaul in the near future, with a revamped interface that lets players run real-life games on their phones, from rolling dice to using skills to casting spells.

With an appearance by the cast of D&D’s official Let’s Play show Dungeon Masters, whose next season will run the World of Warcraft game, the keynote had something for seemingly every player, new or old. It ended with the lights out and the heavy breathing of a certain Sith Lord before a Darth Vader cosplayer showed up on stage, but there was little else shown about the Star Wars set coming next year. But we can look to the World of Warcraft release for clues — I chatted with Blizzard and D&D folks about their collaboration coming later in 2026.

A set of books, maps, tokens and other products laid out against a colorful background.
The full product family for the World of Warcraft set: the sourcebook (left center), special collector’s edition sourcebook (center), Icecrown Citadel adventure (center right), paired map pack (top) and dungeon master’s screen (bottom).

What you’ll get in the World of Warcraft’s D&D set

The World of Warcraft set will have a 256-page sourcebook to introduce the new set, which works with D&D’s 2024 version of 5th edition, also known as D&D 5.5E.

The sourcebook packs a ton of material from the game, detailing 16 species, 11 of which are new to D&D (like the Dracthyr, Earthen and Pandaren). It has nine subclasses, six of which are brand-new (like Demon Hunters and Shadow Priests). Iconic locations like Orgrimmar and Icecrown Citadel are included, as well as stat blocks for famous characters like Arthas Menethil, Jaina Proudmoore, Anduin Lothar, Thrall and Sylvanas Windrunner should you want to befriend (or fight) them. Signature Warcraft items, mounts, bosses — they’re all in the book.

Two piles of books on a table: one for Warcraft's original D&D collaboration in the early 2000s, the other a stack of D&D 3.5 edition rulebooks that the Warcraft books were compatible with.
The original Warcraft Roleplaying Game (left) matches Dungeons & Dragons 3.5 edition rules (right).

If some of this sounds familiar, you might be as old as I am — two decades ago, there was an official Warcraft crossover book for D&D’s 3.5 edition. When I brought this up to Wizards of the Coast’s folks who worked on the upcoming collaboration, they pointed out that the far older crossover spent a lot of its sourcebook establishing baseline tabletop rules. 

The new Universes Beyond version leaves a lot of that out, relying on the streamlined rules of D&D 5.5 and enjoying the greater popularity of D&D to assume that players will know the basics — leaving more room for monsters, artifacts, areas and other iconic parts of World of Warcraft.

Advertisement
A set of products in the Icecrown Citadel adventure pack: a book, maps and character tokens.
The Icecrown Citadel adventure book (right) can be paired with the map pack (center), featuring layouts of pivotal battles in the expedition.

Once the set becomes available for purchase, newcomers can log on to D&D Beyond for a free starting adventure for heroes just starting out from levels one to five. For more advanced players, the set will include a new adventure to Icecrown Citadel for characters of level 16-20. Within, they’ll take on various champions of the undead realm at the northernmost point in Azeroth before confronting the big boss himself, the Lich King. 

Players of the MMORPG may remember taking on the dreaded death knight with two dozen others in massive raids, but the challenges have been scaled down to be undertaken by standard D&D parties of three to five dice-rolling players who fit around a table. Not that the team didn’t think about it — when Hohman brought up the possibility of a 20-person encounter, she was immediately rebuffed.

“If you can get 20 people to align at a D&D table the same night and bring snacks, I think you should run Dungeons & Dragons World of Warcraft with them,” joked Justice Arman, D&D game design director. “If you can get 20, more power to you. If you can get five, we’ve got you covered.”

The team was very thoughtful about how to adapt an MMORPG into a tabletop system, Arman explained: They wanted to be authentic to both, which means not trying to reproduce the mechanics of a digital game, which makes so many decisions for the player that, in a tabletop game, would be managed by its real-time manager, the dungeon master. 

In addition to the main sourcebook, the World of Warcraft set will also include miniatures, a map pack and a dungeon master’s screen with extensive art featuring heroes and villains from the game’s two-decade-plus history. And all you D&D collectors, rest easy: there will be special editions of the set sourcebook that come with a slipcover adorned with the Horde and Alliance faction icons, as well as one covered in Murlocs that’s exclusive to hobby stores.

Advertisement
A set of products -- books on the left, and a DM screen on the right.
The World of Warcraft D&D sourcebook (left) comes in three varieties — a collector’s edition, hobby store edition and standard edition — while the DM screen (right) has extensive art on the outside with quick-access rule resources on the inside.

The overlap between Warcraft and D&D is… a circle?

The Universes Beyond sets are aimed at drawing in new and returning players to D&D using the appeal of the borrowed franchise. With World of Warcraft, there’s a lot of overlap between the fantasy themes, adventurous quests and epic boss showdowns. 

The partnership is coming full circle, said Blizzard’s Longdale, affirming that the company’s online game is one of many RPGs that D&D has spawned. Adapting the MMORPG to pen-and-paper made sense and offers a lot for players who met online to bring their digital game to real-life tables. Moreover, a lot of Blizzard developers on the game have played D&D for years — many of whom discovered just this week that their favorite tabletop system was getting a version based on the very game they work on, Longdale said, indicating the severe secrecy of the collaboration… which had started two years ago.

“I don’t know how many people on our team raised their hand and said, ‘Well, I’ve been a DM, I could have helped,’” Longdale said, laughing.

Three artist interpretations of the Death Knight class across different species: Tauren, Human, and Undead.

The same is true for Wizards of the Coast, as the D&D team itself has plenty of World of Warcraft players, said Ayoub. It meant two teams passionate about both games that led to an excitement and a desire that’ll bear out in the quality of the final product.

“Authenticity was really key. A lot of the ways you look at it is, how does the [D&D] system become an operating system, if you will, to bring this world to life?” Ayoub said. “You turn brilliant designers from two teams together to just make it happen.”

Authenticity kept coming up in my chats with both Blizzard and D&D folks involved in bringing the World of Warcraft and Star Wars collaborations to the tabletop game. There’s surely pressure to make a proper adaptation that does justice to the source material, but there’s a lot of potential for these popular works to bring in players who hadn’t tried tabletop gaming before, easing the burden of tabletop complexity with a universe they already love. 

Advertisement
Art depicting the Demon Hunter class in World of Warcraft’s D&D set — here embodied by the dark hero Illidan Stormrage.

“They have a shared understanding and a shared language,” Hohman said. “As soon as you say, ‘Hey, we’re going to play Star Wars,’ a lot of people understand what that means immediately. They understand the worlds. They understand the sort of characters and stories they might be investing their time into.”

D&D isn’t detailing what’s next for Universes Beyond. The team will see how this year’s worth of content lands, Hohman said, and future partnership announcements will hinge on the timing that works for D&D and its partners — taking it one step at a time. But right now, the team’s ears are open.

“If fans have things they would love to see, worlds they’d love to play in, however close or however far it feels from traditional Dungeons & Dragons, I would definitely love to know that,” Hohman said. “I’m excited to hear what people would be excited about.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple stockpiles inventory as it braces for ‘significant supply constraints’

Published

on

As the generative AI boom drives steep demand for hardware components, Apple and other hardware makers are facing what outgoing CEO Tim Cook calls “a hundred-year flood [on] memory pricing,” which is severely impacting the cost of producing iPhones, MacBooks, and other devices.

Apple described its recent earnings report as its “strongest June quarter ever,” with iPhone and Mac sales performing better than expected, growing 22% and 29%, respectively, year-over-year. Yet the company is bracing for memory shortages, known as RAMageddon, to get even worse. Apple’s biggest challenge is securing the advanced memory nodes used in its Apple silicon chips, which power the A-Series and M-Series processors used in iPhones and Macs.

“We continue to expect high levels of demand. However, with less flexibility in supply chain, we expect the impact from the supply constraints to increase significantly sequentially,” Cook said on Apple’s quarterly earnings call. “We’re seeing some very significant constraints currently with limited flexibility in the supply chain to remedy it.”

Apple is evidently worried enough about supply shortages that it reported $11.1 billion in inventory, nearly double the $5.7 billion it reported last September. This marks a break from Cook’s long-held supply chain approach, which has emphasized minimizing how much inventory Apple has on hand.

Advertisement

These constraints led Apple to “reluctantly” raise the price of Macs and iPads last month, Cook added. Other companies that have raised hardware prices include Meta, SamsungMicrosoft, and Sony.

“We’re going to be scrambling on the supply side, essentially,” Cook said.

For the upcoming quarter, Apple is predicting revenue growth between 9% and 11% year-over-year. But in the last several quarters, Apple has maintained about 16% year-over-year growth. Of course, that worries investors — Apple stock dropped 6% in after-hours trading.

When Senior VP of Hardware Engineering John Ternus steps into the CEO role in September, the company could be facing a rough patch, but at least Apple isn’t alone in its supply struggles.

Advertisement

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic says its own AI models breached three companies during security tests

Published

on

Anthropic said Thursday that an internal investigation uncovered three incidents in which its AI model Claude breached the systems of three organizations while conducting cybersecurity tests. The investigation, and disclosure, comes more than a week after OpenAI disclosed that one of its unreleased models breached Hugging Face’s systems during internal testing.

In all three cases, a Claude model reached the internet from within a testing environment while interacting with a third party and then gained unauthorized access to the live systems of these organizations, Anthropic said in a blog post, describing what it found and what the company plans to change to prevent this from happening again.

Anthropic said the OpenAI episode earlier this month prompted the company to conduct its own cybersecurity evaluation. It specifically looked for evidence that Claude had accessed the internet from within testing environments, which are designed to act as sandboxes and keep models isolated.

Among the 141,006 evaluation runs it reviewed, the AI lab found three incidents in which its model accessed the internet while interacting with Irregular, one of its third-party partners. Anthropic said the access traced back to a misconfiguration in the evaluation environment run with Irregular. It called this a “misunderstanding” between the two companies over whether the test setup had internet access, when in fact it did.

Advertisement

Anthropic said it isn’t placing blame and is “approaching the fixes as if the responsibility were ours alone,” while observing that Irregular is conducting its own separate investigation.

Because of that open connection, the model gained unauthorized access to the production infrastructure of three different organizations. Anthropic said the incidents involved three different Claude models: Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research test model.

Notably, Anthropic said that in each of these cases “Claude was explicitly told by our prompt that it had no internet access.” It appears that the AI model assumed real-world systems to be part of the exercise it was asked to perform.

That assumption didn’t hold up uniformly, as it turns out. The three models didn’t behave the same way once evidence emerged that their targets were real, which Anthropic flagged as one of the more eye-opening findings Thursday.

Advertisement

Opus 4.7, the oldest of the three, recognized that it had reached a real production system in all four runs of that incident. In two of them, it rationalized that the real company must somehow be part of the exercise, but in all four, it kept attacking anyway, including pulling credentials and touching a database of production data. Mythos 5 also picked up on signs that it was on the real internet, but it talked itself back into believing it was still in a simulation, going on to publish a malicious software package to the public Python software registry PyPI, which was then downloaded and run by outside systems before being caught. Only the internal research test model, Anthropic’s newest, stopped on its own once it concluded the target was real.

In response, Anthropic said significant controls must be placed on these kinds of evaluations if powerful AI models are involved, echoing some sentiments within the cybersecurity community.

The company also noted that Claude was running without the additional safety monitoring and classifiers it deploys on generally available models — safeguards it said would have blocked the behavior, because the evaluations are designed to measure the underlying model’s raw capabilities.

Importantly, Anthropic said it found no evidence of any model “pursuing a goal of its own” and instead merely tried to complete the task it was asked to do.

Advertisement

Though comparisons between the mishaps of these fiercely competitive companies are inevitable, Anthropic in its blog post drew a clear distinction between its cybersecurity tests and those of OpenAI, noting where OpenAI’s model exploited an unknown software vulnerability to break out of its test environment, Anthropic’s models instead reached the internet through a path that had, by mistake, been left open.

Anthropic also drew a distinction between itself and OpenAI by noting that it discovered the incidents itself, through a proactive review, and that the two affected organizations it was able to reach hadn’t previously detected the activity or flagged it to Anthropic. (In contrast, Hugging Face detected the recent intrusion of its own systems first; it was only in the following days that OpenAI identified and disclosed that its own AI agent was the perpetrator.)

The company added that it’s now working with the independent evaluation group METR on a third-party review of the incidents.

OpenAI’s accidental breach of Hugging Face, which was the first verifiable case of an AI lab losing control of its model, has sparked a string of wildly differing reactions from the industry and politicians. This latest disclosure from Anthropic ensures the debate over AI models and security will continue.

Advertisement

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

High iPhone demand won’t be met by supply in Q4

Published

on

As it has been almost all of 2026, Apple’s September-quarter growth is expected to be slowed by a lack of supply-side availability that won’t be able to meet “incredibly strong demand” for iPhone, iPad, and Mac products.

If you’re going to have a problem in this world, it isn’t so bad to have an Apple problem. In spite of its $109 billion record breaking June quarter, analysts are already sweating about the September quarter.

Apple didn’t warn of some catastrophic fall in demand or lack of RAM that might impact revenue streams. No, instead Apple CEO Tim Cook shared that demand was so incredibly high that the supply chain wouldn’t be able to keep up.

“Let me stress this again,” Cook said during the earnings call, “this isn’t a partner or supplier issue. This issue is an incredibly strong demand.”

Advertisement

Cook really wants to ensure that investors know that the supply chain is more than capable of providing orders at the usual scale. However, the issue is that demand is much higher and supply constraints have increased to the point that Apple can’t simply order more product.

Realistically, this means that September’s revenue will be lower than it potentially could have been simply because there wasn’t enough inventory available to buy during that quarter. It remains to be seen if supply-side inventory will catch up during the December quarter or not, or if these constraints will continue into 2027.

High demand and growth are good problems to have

Revenue growth is expected to be in the teens for the September quarter.

It is an incredible assertion considering September can be an awkward quarter for Apple. Savvy customers know an iPhone is on the way, so they’ll hold back on purchases.

Advertisement

However, the iPhone does launch with a couple of weeks’ worth of sales in September, which can provide a boost. From what it sounds like, Tim Cook is talking about the iPhone 17 lineup demand more than the upcoming iPhone 18 lineup.

Of course, the discussion also pertains to iPads and Macs. Those products won’t see a refresh until later in the fall, so what demand there is for current options will carry through the quarter.

Supply-side inventory will continue to be a constraint going forward, but expected iPhone price hikes could also create a problem for Apple. That won’t be known until guidance is provided in October or revenue is shared in December.

The counterbalance here is the new Apple Intelligence and Siri AI. Beta testing shows these are well-executed products that could drive incredible demand, even with potential price increases.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Netflix Sued For Losing ‘Master Copy’ of Unreleased Nicolas Cage Movie

Published

on

A production company and filmmaker are suing Netflix for $105 million, alleging the streamer lost a stolen drive containing an unencrypted master copy of the unreleased Nicolas Cage film Fortitude, which they claim damage its exclusivity and market value. Netflix denied responsibility for the lost film but said it takes content security seriously and has offered to monitor piracy sites for unauthorized copies. CBS News reports: The complaint filed on Wednesday in California district court alleges that the film’s associate producer, Daniel Haido, hand-delivered an unencrypted master copy of the film to Netflix so the company could screen it as a potential buyer. Haido verbally instructed the employee to delete the files after the screening, according to the suit. A little over a week after the screening, Netflix emailed the filmmakers to say the drive had been stolen, the plaintiffs allege. “Someone stole a good amount of drives from our office desks this past week,” a Netflix executive wrote in the email, according to the suit.

The complaint notes the movie, entitled “Fortitude,” took over seven years to make and cost $45 million. It tells the story of a secret mission called Operation Fortitude during World War II that was orchestrated to mislead the Nazis about the Allied invasion of Europe. The film stars Nicolas Cage as Dusko Popov, a real-life spy during World War II, as well as Sir Ben Kingsley and Ron Perlman.

The plaintiffs said studios will now be dissuaded from buying the rights to the movie, knowing that a version of it could be released by a third party for free. “The film’s value depended in significant part on its exclusivity as an unreleased, first-to-market work,” the complaint states. “By losing control of the film, Netflix destroyed that exclusivity and materially, if not completely, impaired the film’s marketability.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Honda ‘Accord SUV’ Could Take On The Subaru Outback In 2029

Published

on





The Subaru Outback, an affordably priced mid-size SUV meant to tackle off-roading adventures, hasn’t really seen a lot of competition in the United States. That may change in 2029 when Honda’s so-called “Accord SUV” goes into production, as confirmed by an anonymous insider (via Automotive News). 

The “Accord SUV” appears as a lifted Accord hatchback with added utility in Honda’s internal planning document — this includes a higher driving position and a useful cargo area. By using the existing Accord platform, Honda could take advantage of the vehicle’s long wheelbase, offering a vehicle that would sit somewhere between a sedan and a full crossover. It may also appeal to drivers that miss the days when the Outback was a station wagon rather than an SUV. Not much is known about the rumored Honda Accord SUV — the insider claims that it will arrive alongside the redesigned Accord in 2030 with Honda’s next-generation hybrid powertrain. However, Honda told Car and Driver it has no plan to make “this type of vehicle.” 

Advertisement

Why is the Subaru Outback no longer a station wagon?

The Subaru Outback was introduced in 1995 as an off-roading variant of the Legacy sedan, covered in plastic cladding and given extra ground clearance. Over the past few decades, the Outback has been one of Subaru’s best-selling vehicles. So, fans of the station wagon were shocked when the 2026 model took a totally different turn

The Subaru Outback is now an SUV rather than a station wagon. This is because Subaru discontinued the Legacy at the end of 2025, meaning the Outback no longer had a sedan to be built off of. The Outback still has all-wheel drive, plastic cladding, and other Outback-y features, but there is now a space for the Honda Accord SUV, a lifted sedan that isn’t quite an SUV — especially if it’s as capable off-roading as the Outback. Not everyone wants a Honda CR-V — although it’s currently the best-selling SUV in the United States in 2026

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Gemini Spark can now use Chrome logins and saved passwords to run errands on your behalf

Published

on

Google is integrating Gemini Spark with Chrome so it can carry web-based tasks further without users having to take over at every step. The search giant is also expanding access to AI Pro subscribers in more than 160 additional countries, although the new browser capabilities are initially limited to the United States.

How Chrome auto browse works

Chrome auto browse allows Spark to navigate websites using the accounts you are already signed into and passwords saved in the browser. Access requires permission from the user rather than being enabled automatically.

Google says Spark can use the feature to schedule viewings for saved apartment listings, compare flight options, and begin the booking process. It can move between pages and complete several steps without requiring the user to guide every action.

Spark hands control back before sensitive actions such as payments. Google also says it has added protections against prompt injection, where instructions hidden on a webpage attempt to manipulate an AI agent into performing an unintended action. Chrome auto-browse is rolling out first in the US, with additional regions expected to follow later.

Spark is reaching considerably more users

Gemini Spark launched at Google I/O in May as a cloud-based agent that can continue working after a laptop is closed or a phone is locked. It initially focused on Google services such as Gmail, Drive, Docs, Calendar, Keep, and Tasks before adding several third-party integrations.

Advertisement

Spark also arrived on the Mac in June, gaining the ability to organize local files and work across supported desktop apps. Google recently expanded access beyond its expensive Ultra subscription, bringing Spark to the $20-per-month Google AI Pro plan in the US.

Pro subscribers in more than 160 additional countries are now gaining access. Chrome integration is one of Spark’s most important upgrades so far. It removes one of the agent’s biggest limitations by allowing tasks to continue beyond connected apps instead of stopping when the next step requires navigating a website.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Apple AI compute costs will be covered by iCloud+ subscriptions

Published

on

Monetizing AI is a tricky business and it seems Apple’s only plans so far are tying daily usage limits to users’ iCloud+ subscription tier, but whether or not that’ll be enough isn’t yet known.

Apple may be prioritizing on-device AI, but the requests that need to go to Private Cloud Compute servers still cost money. Those costs will be offset by offering increased daily usage limits for higher iCloud+ tiers, but that may only be the start of Apple’s AI monetization plan.

Apple CEO Tim Cook responded to an analyst question during the Q3 earnings call regarding AI compute costs with information that was shared previously. However, one tidbit stood out that hints at Apple’s ambitions for drawing in more revenue from AI.

“And so, we couldn’t be happier with how things are going,” Cook said of iOS 27 AI beta testing. “In terms of what it means for compute cost, it’s obviously early going for us, and so I don’t want to say that we have a complete plan for that.”

Advertisement

He states here, and again later in the call, that AI daily usage limits will be tied to a user’s iCloud+ subscription tier. What that means and which tier gets what hasn’t been detailed yet, but this information was shared during the WWDC keynote as well.

In response to another question, Cook shared that operation expenditures will increase thanks to AI. He says that whether or not iCloud+ plans will balance the books is “uncertain.”

Apple has also confirmed that iCloud+ tiers will determine how much AI video recognition functionality users will get in their Apple Home. Users need the 2TB or Apple One Premier plan to get unlimited cameras and AI footage analysis.

iCloud+ and AI

Apple Intelligence and Siri AI are free to use as long as you have devices that support those features. However, server-side operations are limited.

Advertisement
Blue cloud icon on a rounded white square with soft shadow, centered above the text iCloud+ on a light gray background

iCloud+ will provide more usage tokens to users

Users will have to pay more to get more AI tokens. Though, unlike Apple’s competitors, its user base may already be subscribed to a service that will grant them additional tokens.

iCloud has a free 5GB tier that likely includes very few AI usage tokens overall. A user might blow through these tokens after a few prompts for an image, for example.

iCloud+ starts with a $1 per month tier for 50GB of storage and additional tokens. It’s also included in the Apple One Individual plan.

Advertisement

The $3 iCloud+ tier includes 200GB of storage, additional token usage, and is included in Apple One Family. The $10 tier is 2TB of storage, more tokens still, and unlimited HomeKit Secure Video cameras with AI video analysis, which is included with Apple One Premier.

Those that need even more storage after buying Apple One Premier can add on any additional iCloud+ subscription, including the $1, $3, and $10 plans. After that, there are two iCloud+ tiers that stand on their own: $30 for 6TB and $60 for 12TB.

Apple will likely tie even higher AI token usage limits to these very expensive tiers. Although, it seems very expensive considering the abilities of Apple Intelligence and Siri AI today, especially if you don’t need the storage space.

AI driving services growth

As Cook said, Apple will evaluate compute costs versus iCloud+ subscription rates to see how things balance. If more options are needed, Apple will bring them about.

Advertisement
Bar chart titled Services Revenue per Quarter showing steady growth in orange bars from about 10,000 million in 2018 Q3 to over 30,000 million by 2026 Q3

Apple’s quest for infinite services growth continues

I expect that there will be a hybrid system in place, eventually. Sure, having token usage tiers tied to iCloud+ is fine, but requiring users to pay for storage they don’t need is silly.

Instead, for those on the Apple One Premier plan for example, I expect Apple will also sell one-time purchase packs or a separate token-use subscription. Never count Apple out of offering more services.

This is not even the beginning of Apple Intelligence and Siri AI, as they are still in a beta preview. Things could evolve quickly in the coming months and years, and while Apple AI usage is limited today, it won’t always be.

Advertisement

As Apple gives us more ways to use AI, its costs will increase, and so the users’ costs will too. Increased monetization efforts means more services revenue, which should calm down those investors and analysts still worrying for Apple’s survival after a $109 billion Q3.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

China’s cheap AI models pose a big threat to Claude and ChatGPT

Published

on

The AI industry’s investors and critics don’t agree on much. But many in each camp share at least one basic conviction: America’s top labs are about to make a killing.

Capital markets have signaled their faith in Anthropic and OpenAI’s impending hyper-profitability, valuing each at nearly $1 trillion. Many of Silicon Valley’s progressive adversaries also expect the labs to grow filthy rich but fear the implications, warning that AI-induced automation could transfer vast sums of money from ordinary workers to a handful of giant tech companies. Sen. Bernie Sanders’s call for nationalizing the top AI labs rests partly on that concern.

  • The AI industry may be more competitive than investors expected.
  • Chinese labs are producing models nearly as powerful as Claude and ChatGPT — and dramatically cheaper.
  • That could make frontier AI a low-margin business.
  • A world of cheap, open-source AI would bring both promise and danger.

But recent advances in Chinese AI call all of this into question.

Over the past two months, Chinese companies have released three AI models that are nearly as powerful as America’s frontier systems — and radically less expensive.

In June, Beijing’s Z.ai debuted a model that performed nearly as well as Claude and ChatGPT’s second-tier systems on independent benchmarks. Weeks later, another Chinese firm, Moonshot, unveiled “Kimi K3,” a model that allegedly outperforms all of its American rivals except for the very latest versions of Claude and ChatGPT. Finally, just days ago, Alibaba launched a preview of Qwen3.8 Max, which purportedly outclasses even OpenAI’s most advanced systems, while trailing only Claude’s Fable in its capabilities. (Disclosure: Vox Media is one of several publishers that have signed partnership agreements with OpenAI. Our reporting remains editorially independent.)

Advertisement

These developments don’t merely threaten America’s AI giants with stiffer competition in the race for superintelligence. Rather, they raise a more harrowing prospect: that the AI race’s ultimate rewards will be far smaller than anticipated. In a world where new advances can regularly be leapfrogged by cheaper upstarts, hoarding the technology — and its profits — will be harder for any one company to do.

In other words, building a machine God might not be as lucrative as it’s cracked up to be. AI, it turns out, may “want to be free.”

How AI was supposed to pay off

To see how China’s new models threaten Anthropic’s profit expectations, we must first examine why those expectations have been so high.

Advertisement

This is not entirely self-evident. After all, AI labs aren’t much like the hyper-profitable tech giants of the 2010s. Facebook and Airbrb were relatively capital-light businesses with ultra-low marginal costs (adding a profile to Facebook or listing to Airbnb costs the companies virtually nothing). And once each gained a foothold in their respective markets, network effects enabled them to retain formidable positions without needing to constantly upgrade their products.

Building a state-of-the-art AI company is a much more involved — and astronomically more expensive — endeavor. To get to the frontier, Anthropic and OpenAI have sunk (at least) tens of billions into semiconductors, data centers, power plants, and other capital investments. Staying at the cutting-edge, meanwhile, compels them to perpetually churn out evermore costly models.

To put a new Claude model through its initial training — in which it spends months digesting the internet and sussing out statistical patterns within its text — can now cost hundreds of millions of dollars. And such foundational computation is only the beginning. A truly superlative model requires several additional months of fine-tuning. Armies of contracted experts — such as computer scientists, physicians, and mathematicians — tutor the models, grading their answers and guiding them towards better ones. Then the AI systems complete millions of rounds of practice, in which they learn through trial and error how to solve countless problems. This arduous process, known as “post-training,” compounds the costs of a single model’s development.

All of which raises the question: Why would investors expect businesses with a cost-structure this challenging to be not merely profitable, but massively so?

Advertisement

There are (at least) two answers. The first (and most obvious) is that the market for superintelligent machines is liable to be vast. Frontier AI systems promise to reduce costs and improve performance in myriad white-collar sectors. And Anthropic’s soaring revenues indicate that firms do, in fact, find Claude useful. A company like AirBnB has earned billions by revolutionizing a single industry; imagine then what a technology that remade virtually all industries might be worth.

Of course, plenty of technologies are valuable but not massively profitable to produce. After all, in well-functioning markets, competition should eventually erode individual firms’ margins, even if the underlying technology continues generating huge value.

But this is where the second answer comes in: Frontier labs’ immense costs are a burden, but they’re also a safeguard against competition — or, in industry parlance, a “moat.”

Startups may be able to afford to build or acquire more rudimentary models, many of which are “open source.” But, the thinking goes, they won’t be able to deliver Claude Fable-level performance without raising giant amounts of capital. And what investors will be willing to pour hundreds of billions into an AI pipsqueak that’s light-years behind Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI?

Advertisement

Alas, the Chinese AI labs’ rapid progress — and the way it was achieved — suggest that Anthropic’s moat may be shallower than previously thought.

How Moonshot swam Anthropic’s moat

The existence of powerful, Chinese AI systems is neither new nor surprising. Xi Jinping’s government has made vying for global AI dominance a key economic goal. And China’s DeepSeek, which also has stunned US companies with its lower-cost competitive models, surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free iPhone app more than a year ago.

The latest models, however, have dramatically narrowed the gap in capabilities between frontier American systems and their Chinese rivals. Just as critically, they’ve done so in a manner that other, relatively underfunded AI upstarts might be able to emulate.

Advertisement

Alibaba and Moonshot needed to invest massive resources to train their base models. But they allegedly found a low-cost way to refine those models into near-frontier systems: Just ask Claude.

Or, more specifically: Engage Claude in 16 million conversations, using 24,000 fake accounts. In each of those exchanges, ask the model to not only answer countless difficult questions but also, walk you through its reasoning, step by step. Then take all of this data and feed it into your own model as study material, training it to respond to the world’s most challenging queries as Claude would.

Through this process — known as “distillation” — an AI lab can replicate virtually all of a frontier model’s capacities, without sinking vast sums into human experts and post-training computing runs.

China’s AI labs have not admitted to using distillation. But OpenAI and Anthropic both reportedly uncovered Chinese distillation attempts earlier this year. And some of the new models appear to display tell-tale signs of distillation in conversations with ordinary users; Kimi K3 has routinely identified itself as “Claude.”

Advertisement

Chinese AI companies are hardly alone in using distillation to catch up with frontier labs. Earlier this year, Elon Musk admitted in court that xAI enhanced Grok’s capabilities by running distillation techniques on Claude and ChatGPT. Nonetheless, China’s latest models appear to demonstrate that distillation can help take a second-tier model to the frontier’s threshold.

America’s frontier labs have tried to defend themselves against such imitators. But this is technically difficult when distillers can assemble massive networks of bots, each asking an inconspicuous number of questions. And legally, it is difficult for America’s AI giants to argue that distillers are stealing their intellectual property. After all, in a sense, China’s copycats are merely doing to Anthropic and OpenAI what those companies did to journalists, coders, lawyers and other specialists: Feeding their public-facing outputs into a model, which then replicates their capabilities by discerning underlying patterns within the text.

Oh, and China’s giving these models away

The new Chinese models would have caused Silicon Valley enough headaches, if they merely provided stiffer competition, while demonstrating the power of distillation.

Advertisement

What makes Kimi K3 and Qwen3.8 Max especially threatening to the American AI giants’ profitmaking potential, however, is that they are officially open source — meaning that the models’ parameters can be downloaded for free. (Alibaba and Moonshot have not yet released these parameters, but they say they will shortly.)

In other words, any company or hobbyist with enough computing power will soon be able to run a near-frontier Chinese model on their own hardware, modify that model to better serve a specialized purpose, and then sell access to their new version — without paying Alibiba a single yuan.

As Kimi and Qwen grow more capable, their market-share is likely to grow, at American AI giants’ expense.

For many of Anthropic and OpenAI’s potential customers, that proposition may be hard to turn down. Most businesses don’t need the world’s smartest AI, just one competent at their enterprise’s core tasks — compiling legal research, answering IT queries, writing working code, etc. A model that produces outputs 90 percent as good as Claude’s — at roughly one-sixth of the cost — will sound pretty good to many corporations.

Advertisement

Further, open source models aren’t just cheaper than frontier systems, but potentially more secure. If you run an AI on your firm’s own servers, then you don’t need to entrust sensitive data to Anthropic, Google, or OpenAI.

All this had led much of corporate America to embrace open-source models, even before the latest versions narrowed the capabilities gap. In a Linux Foundation survey, 63 percent of organizations reported using open-source AI systems.

And increasingly, those models are Chinese. According to Sequoia Capital, one of Silicon Valley’s premier venture capitalist firms, a majority of American AI startups now use open-source Chinese systems. As Kimi and Qwen grow more capable, their market-share is likely to grow, at American AI giants’ expense.

What’s bad for OpenAI is good (and/or catastrophic) for humanity

Advertisement

All this said, it is still entirely possible that OpenAI and Anthropic will justify their colossal valuations. In many highly competitive economic domains, having access to the world’s very best AI model will remain highly valuable. And America’s frontier labs still outperform all their peers.

But it’s increasingly plausible that selling state-of-the-art AI systems will prove to be a low-margin undertaking. In a world of ubiquitous, near-frontier open source models, the AI sector’s big winners probably won’t be its top labs, but rather, its chipmakers and cloud computing providers.

For ordinary people, a future where superintelligence is dirt cheap — and rival AI companies are constantly rising and falling, rather than consolidating into mega-corporations — would look somewhat different than the cyberpunk dystopia that the left’s been dreading.

And not entirely in a good way. For one thing, in that reality, mitigating AI’s biggest risks would be immensely difficult. Having a handful of firms monopolize control over frontier AI systems is bad in many respects. But it does make those models easier to regulate, as the Trump administration’s decision to temporarily block Claude’s Fable in the name of cybersecurity demonstrated.

Advertisement

By contrast, if recipes for ultra-powerful AI models are published all over the internet — and anyone with modest technical skills can modify them at will — then systems willing to help their users hack government bureaucracies or engineer bio-weapons are liable to proliferate.

From another angle, however, the “AI becomes almost free” scenario may look like capitalism at its finest: Retrospectively, such a development would mean that a small number of extremely rich people bankrolled the creation of an immensely useful technology, under the expectation of massive profits, only to see competition erode their returns — and disperse that tech’s benefits across a wider group of businesses and consumers.

Granted, in the case of AI, this process might also generate a super-virus that kills us all. But hey, no system is perfect.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025