Tech
7 Best Outdoor Security Cameras (2026) After Testing Dozens
Compare The Top 7 Security Cameras
Best MicroSD Cards
Some security cameras support local storage, enabling you to record videos on the camera or a linked hub. A few hubs have built-in storage, and some provide slots for hard drives, but most rely on microSD cards. This is a quick guide on what to look for (plus some recommendations).
The microSD card you choose should have fast read and write speeds so you can record high-quality video and play it back without delay. I recommend going for Class 10 microSD cards rated as U1 or U3. You can dive deeper into what that means in our SD card explainer. Before you buy, check the card type, format, and maximum supported card size for your security camera. Consider how many hours of video each card capacity can store. For example, you might get a couple of days of HD video on a 32-GB card. If you want to record continuously, you likely want a higher-capacity card.
Courtesy of Samsung
I recommend formatting the card as soon as you insert it into the camera. You will usually be prompted to do this, but if not, there is generally an option in the settings. Just remember, formatting will wipe anything on the microSD card, so back up the contents first.
Some security camera manufacturers offer their own branded microSD cards. They work just fine, but for maximum reliability, I’d suggest one of the following options. Remember to always check the specs. Even different sizes of cards in the same range often have different capabilities.
Note: Memory card prices have gone crazy due to the AI chip shortage, so you may want to wait or shop around, as some of these cards are four times the usual price.
Other Good Outdoor Security Cameras I’ve Tested
I’ve tested several other outdoor security cameras. These are the ones I like, but they just missed out on a place above. Some of our indoor camera picks can also be used outdoors.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Eufy Eufycam C37 for $90: If you want a pan-and-tilt camera but find the EufyCam S4 too pricey, the C37 is worth considering. The 2K footage is clear, it can pan through 360 degrees, the automatic subject tracking works well, and you can record locally with a microSD card (sold separately) or hook it up to Eufy’s HomeBase Mini or HomeBase 3. You also get reasonably accurate onboard AI that can identify people, vehicles, and pets. The detachable solar panel is a welcome inclusion and keeps the battery topped off. On the downside, it took me several attempts to update the firmware (connectivity is 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi), my test unit had trouble staying connected, and it sometimes refused to load the live feed. It worked far more reliably when connected to the HomeBase 3.
Baseus Security X1 Pro Outdoor Dual Camera for $150: With dual 3K lenses and the ability to pan through 300 degrees, this feature-packed camera looks interesting. It can record locally on a microSD card, has a sun-tracking solar panel (which is a bit gimmicky), onboard AI detection, and supports patrolling and automatic subject tracking. But it sometimes failed to detect motion events in my tests, randomly lost connectivity a couple of times, and frequently took a while to load the live feed.
Wyze Window Cam for $35: If you can’t fit a camera on your exterior for some reason, this could be a handy option because it sticks directly to the inside of your window. You must run the 10-foot power cord to an outlet, which doesn’t look pretty, but it will afford you a decent view with minimal glare, though it’s only 1080p and can’t compete with the cameras above on picture quality. It’s quick and easy to set up, and you can record locally on a microSD card, but you can’t really angle it, so you need a good spot to make it worthwhile.
TP-Link Tapo C675D for $230: I’m a little disappointed by TP-Link’s newer Tapo cameras, and the C675D is no exception. On paper, a dual-lens 4K camera with automatic subject tracking and zoom, local recording, and a solar panel sounds great at this price, but real-life performance was underwhelming. The frame rate is only 15, so the footage is often blurry. It also lacks HDR, and I experienced intermittent connectivity issues. I’d rather have 2K with a higher frame rate and HDR. Sure, you can zoom in and read a distant license plate, if that’s important to you, but moving subjects are not as clear, and the camera is so slow it sometimes misses the action. I don’t mind cloud storage and advanced AI being subscription-only, but I’m annoyed that TP-Link paywalls snapshot notifications and smart filters. All that said, there’s some impressive hardware here at a lower price than competitors, and it could work well in the right spot (shaded under eaves at a corner).
Photograph: Simon Hill
Reolink Altas PT Ultra for $220: This battery-powered camera supports continuous recording in up to 4K resolution. It can pan 355 degrees and tilt 90 degrees, supports Wi-Fi 6 (2.4 or 5 GHz), and has a versatile L-shaped bracket for installation on a wall or roof. It is bulkier than your average security camera because of the whopping 20,000-mAh battery. The optional solar panel will keep it topped up if you live somewhere sunny enough. You can record locally to a microSD card, Reolink Home Hub, or opt for cloud storage starting from $3.50 per month. The continuous recording captures low-frame-rate footage (5 fps by default, but you can select 1, 2, or 10), and the camera kicks up to its full frame rate when motion is detected, but it only maxes out at 15 fps, so it’s often blurry. The 10 prerecorded seconds on each clip can be handy, and the footage is generally decent, though the camera could benefit from HDR to prevent bright areas from blowing out. The color night vision is good if there’s at least a little light, and there’s a spotlight if you prefer. The two-way audio can be a little laggy, but the live stream usually loads quickly, and the camera sends accurate alerts. It can recognize people, vehicles, and animals and automatically track them before returning to its starting position.
Arlo Go 2 (Battery) for $200: If you need a security camera in an area with patchy or no Wi-Fi, go with the Arlo Go 2. It boasts 4G LTE support, and in the US, you can get service from T-Mobile, Verizon, AT&T, Cellcom, or UScellular. You can take it camping, use it with your RV, or install it in another remote spot you want to keep an eye on. Video quality is solid but limited to 1080p to keep the data requirements under control. There’s also two-way audio, a siren, a spotlight for color night vision, and optional local storage with a microSD card (sold separately). The camera is IP65-rated and completely wireless, with a hefty battery inside (mine was at 39 percent after two months). If you’re worried about charging it, you can buy a solar panel ($60) accessory. It employs the same excellent app as my top pick, with smart alerts and rich notifications, so you can filter for people, animals, vehicles, and packages. Alerts are swift and accurate in my testing, but your mileage will vary based on local signal strength. You will need an Arlo Secure plan, which can get expensive. Video recorded on the microSD card cannot be accessed remotely; it’s more of a backup that you can check later if required. One thing that elevates this camera over many other LTE cameras is that it supports Wi-Fi and automatically connects where it’s available, which is ideal for RV owners.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Eufy S4 Max for $1,500: Eufy’s high-end NVR (network video recorder) package is an impressively versatile home security system that keeps everything local, but it’s overkill for the average home (it puts Tony Montana’s setup to shame). This pricey kit includes an NVR with 2 TB of storage (expandable to 16 TB and 16 channels) and four of its clever new pan/tilt, triple-lens S4 cameras that connect via Ethernet cable (each one requires two channels). As an 8-port PoE system, a single cable transfers data and delivers power, but you must run separate cables to each camera. The camera is an enhanced version of our pan/tilt pick above, adding a fixed 4K camera with a 122-degree field of view above dual 2K pan/tilt lenses that can track subjects and zoom up to 8X. The onboard AI is solid, offering accurate subject detection and tracking across your cameras, though the face recognition sometimes gets it wrong. Handily, you can search footage with keywords, and it’s all handled locally. You can reduce the price by mixing and matching different camera types, and add-on cameras are available.
Arlo Essential Pan Tilt Security Camera for $60: Surprisingly affordable, this camera is easy to recommend for anyone with an Arlo system. It can pan through 360 degrees and tilt close to 180 degrees, serves up clear 2K footage, and benefits from Arlo’s smart detection and reliable alerts, though you do need a subscription to make it worth buying. At $10 per month for a single camera, it’s very expensive, though it makes more sense if you have multiple cameras since $20 a month covers unlimited devices (you can bring those prices down to $8 a month and $18 a month if you pay annually). The motion tracking is good, but I worry a little about the longevity, and this camera doesn’t have an IP rating (it’s just described as weather-resistant).
Blink Mini Arc for $100: The Blink Arc is a smart bit of innovation in the form of a plastic mount that holds two Blink Mini 2K+ or Mini 2 cameras and stitches the footage together in the software to give you a 180-degree view that’s perfect for covering a complete side of your house. On the downside, you must plug the cameras in, which means running a power cable, and you must subscribe to Blink Plus ($12 per month or $120 a year) to get the panoramic stitched together view. If you already have the Mini 2K+ cameras, you can just buy the mount ($20). Either way, you’ll need the Blink Weather-Resistant Power Adapter ($10) to use this outdoors. If you’re already invested in Blink, this could be worthwhile, but if you just want a 180-degree camera, the Reolink Argus 4 Pro recommended above is a better bet for most folks.
Eufy C35 2-Cam Kit for $200: For folks with modest needs, this is a very affordable kit that sets you up with two cameras and a local hub with 8 GB of storage (expandable to 1 TB). The cameras are compact, with a lovely magnetic mount that makes installation a breeze, but the resolution is just 1080p, the frame rate is 15 fps, and there’s no HDR, so footage can be a bit blurry or overexposed at times. Eufy’s app is solid and feature-rich without the need for a subscription. Watch out for frequent discounts that make this kit a real bargain.
Google Nest Cam (Battery, Outdoor) for $180: If you can’t run a power cable, this battery-powered camera is easy enough for renters to install, with a proprietary magnetic mount to customize the angle. The 130-degree field of view encompassed my driveway, front door, and most of my front yard. It captures sharp 1080p video with HDR and night vision, and it has a clear speaker and microphone. The alerts are seamless, and the motion detector was accurate and sensitive enough to tell that the slight whisk of a passing ponytail was a person. You should also consider the Nest Cam with Floodlight. WIRED editor Julian Chokkattu has been using it for more than two years with no problems. While it’s the same battery-powered camera, it needs to be hardwired to power the lights (and keep the battery running). Just like the Nest Cam above, you need a Google Home Premium subscription, from $10 per month, to unlock smart features and cloud storage (you only get three hours of video history without a subscription).
Photograph: Simon Hill
TP-Link Tapo C660 for $170: I was excited to try TP-Link’s line of Tapo cameras, and the C660 immediately jumped out with some compelling features. Offering 4K footage, 360-degree pan and 90-degree tilt, a 10,000-mAh battery, a sizable solar panel, and local storage on a microSD card, the C660 is a solid choice for hard-to-reach areas. To sweeten the deal, it has on-device AI detection and dual-band Wi-Fi support, and it can record continuously at 1 fps (you can up the capture interval to every 5, 10, 20, 30, or 60 seconds). Sadly, I found the tracking was flaky, moving subjects at night often appeared blurry (the frame rate is 15 to 20 fps), and the sound was tinny and echoey. The camera has to be mounted quite high, as it’s angled down, and I have concerns about continuous recording and battery life in the winter. It handled a router change without issue, staying connected, and despite a few false positives, the AI detection works well, and the app loads swiftly. For some folks, it may be a better option than our pan/tilt recommendations above.
TP-Link Tapo HybridCam Duo C246D for $70: Undeniably great value, this dual-lens pan-and-tilt camera from TP-Link is worth a look. The versatile design allows for indoor or outdoor use, and you can sit the camera on a table or shelf or mount it the other way round using the supplied bracket. The only complication for outdoor use is the need to run the USB-C power cable to an outlet. There’s a 2K fixed lens with a 130-degree field of view and a second 2K telephoto lens that can pan 360 degrees and tilt 135 degrees. You can insert a microSD card if you want to record locally, and there’s on-device AI detection that works pretty well (I did get the odd false positive). The automatic tracking is quite good but not perfect, especially at night. Fast-moving subjects can appear blurry, and the frame rate maxes out at 15 fps.
TP-Link Tapo C325WB for $70: Our hardwired camera pick for a long time, the C325WB boasts a large aperture and image sensor that enables color nighttime footage without a spotlight, making it ideal for dark corridors and side passages. It also has a motion-triggered spotlight. You can filter for people, pets, or vehicles, and set up private zones in the Tapo app. This camera is weatherproof with an IP66 rating and can take up to 512 GB microSD cards for local recordings. By default, the camera mostly records at 720p, so you need to dig into the settings to push the resolution to 2K and turn on HDR, or you can expect choppy, overexposed video. I also had to reduce the motion-detection sensitivity to prevent false positives, and the onboard AI is flaky, frequently identifying my cat as a person. While the feed was mostly quick to load in the Tapo app, it was sometimes slow or failed to load on my Nest Hub. There’s an Ethernet port here, too, but sadly, no PoE (power over Ethernet) support. Cloud storage is an option with Tapo Care (from $3.50 monthly for a single camera).
Photograph: Simon Hill
Swann MaxRanger 4K 2-Camera Kit for $462: This kit was very easy to set up, as the cameras come paired with the hub, so you just need to plug the hub into your router. The 4K video is crisp and clear with vibrant colors, and the cameras worked well day or night. The main selling point is range, and I was able to put a camera at the bottom of my garden, which is too far away for most security cameras to work well. I also love that you can see multiple feeds simultaneously in the app, and the hub has a backup battery, just in case the power goes out. But the solar panels on top of these cameras don’t seem to work well, and one of the cameras drained quite quickly, even with ample sunlight. I also had to turn off and reconnect the system after changing my router, despite having the same network name and details. While it was generally quick, the feed sometimes took a while and, on one occasion, completely refused to load, so I have concerns about consistency.
Imilab EC6 Panorama for $170: This interesting camera combines a 180-degree view created by stitching two lenses together, like the Reolink Argus 4 Pro above, with pan (344 degrees) and tilt (90 degrees) functionality to give an expansive view that might usually require multiple cameras. It’s large and designed to sit under your eaves, but you will also have to run a power cable, as there’s no battery. You get decent 3.5K quality footage and infrared night vision. It works with Xiaomi’s Home app, and you can record locally on a microSD card. There is on-device AI detection for people and vehicles, and the camera can automatically track subjects, though it doesn’t always work well, especially at night. Daytime footage is also much better than nighttime, even with the spotlight to enable color capture.
Eufy Security Solar Wall Light Cam S120 for $100: In the right spot, this weather-resistant security camera and motion-activated light from Eufy is an excellent set-and-forget device. It records 2K video on 8 GB of built-in storage, has a 300-lumen, motion-activated light, and a solar panel to keep it charged up (it needs two hours of sunlight a day to stay charged). The camera is not Eufy’s best, as it’s limited to a 120-degree field of view, it doesn’t have HDR, and the frame rate is only 15 fps. The footage is reasonably crisp when you set the resolution to 2K, and alerts come through reliably and swiftly. You can also set privacy and activity zones in the app, set detection to human-only, and tweak how the light works. The S120 has an alarm built in, offers reasonable two-way audio (though only one way at a time), and has night vision. The S120 is a little slower to load than the other Eufy cameras I recommend here, and it sometimes misses the beginning, starting the video with subjects already halfway across the frame. But as a one-off purchase, with no need for a subscription, it will suit some folks.
Philips Hue Secure Camera for $99: Homes kitted out with Philips Hue smart lights may find the company’s security camera range interesting. The Philips Hue Secure Wired Camera (7/10, WIRED Recommends) is quick and easy to add to the Hue app, offers crisp 1080p video, and is weatherproof, with an IP65 rating. It offers a fairly expansive 140-degree field of view, two-way audio, and a siren, and is quick to send motion alerts. The live feed loads swiftly in the Hue app. You now get 24 hours of video history included, but you must subscribe for $4 per month ($40/year) for a single camera to get 30 days of cloud storage and unlock smart detection features. You can set up privacy and activity zones, and filter by person, animal, vehicle, and package. The AI performed well for me, and all video is end-to-end encrypted (there’s no local storage option). If you have a Hue Bridge, you can have the cameras trigger your indoor or outdoor lighting. The Battery camera drained by only 12 percent in the first two weeks (on course for between three and four months), but then it seemed to die overnight. I have since recharged (which took more than eight hours), and it seems to be working normally. Ultimately, the wired camera works better, but both are unreliable when it comes to alerts, sometimes missing events that other cameras caught, so they’re only worth considering for Hue fans. Philips Hue has also announced a new 2K range, but we haven’t tested them yet.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Baseus S2 4K for $80: This camera has two lenses (a regular wide-angle and a telephoto for close-ups), which is an interesting idea but requires careful placement. The footage is good at up to 4K but only 15 fps, and there’s no color night vision without the spotlight. It records locally to a microSD card (up to 512 GB). The cameras can’t move, but the solar panel on top can rotate to catch more rays. While mine stayed topped up, this feels a bit gimmicky. There is human and vehicle detection, but I got several false positives (cats flagged as humans), and it sometimes alerted me, but failed to record video clips. The two-way audio is good. While this system doesn’t match the EufyCam S3 Pro above, it is cheaper.
Reolink Duo 3 PoE for $200 or Duo 3 Wi-Fi for $220: Most folks seeking a dual-lens camera that stitches together for a 180-degree view should opt for the Reolink Argus 4 Pro listed above, but if you can run an Ethernet or power cable, you could save some money with the Duo 3. It also offers a higher resolution than the Argus, but it only has color night vision with a spotlight. The Wi-Fi version only needs a power cable, but annoyingly, you do have to plug in via Ethernet during the initial setup. Both versions work well and use the same app as the Reolink cameras above.
Annke NightChroma NCD800 for $280: Probably best suited for a small business, this PoE dual-lens camera offers clear 4K footage and color night vision. It stitches the two images to give you a complete 180-degree view. There is built-in AI human and vehicle detection, and Annke claims it can learn to disregard waving branches, raindrops, and other false positives. There’s a spotlight that can strobe along with the siren sounding to scare intruders away, decent two-way audio, and local recording via NVR, NAS, or microSD card. Setup is tricky, and you need to run an Ethernet cable to the camera as there’s no battery or Wi-Fi.
Logitech Circle View for $160: There are some big caveats to this camera, including the permanently attached 10-foot power cord that’s not weatherproof, the need for a HomeKit hub, such as HomePod Mini or Apple TV, and zero compatibility with Android. If none of that fazes you, then it’s a solid outdoor camera for privacy-minded folks. It doesn’t have a separate app of its own; you add it directly in Apple’s Home app by scanning a QR code. It captures Full HD video and boasts an extremely wide 180-degree field of view, though there’s a bit of a fish-eye effect here. (The lack of HDR also means areas are sometimes too dark or blown out.) There’s motion detection, two-way audio, and decent night vision, and you can ask Siri to display the live feed, which loads quickly.
Annke C800 for $90: This is a solid PoE (Power-over-Ethernet) camera that supports the Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and Open Network Video Interface Forum (ONVIF), making it a good choice for folks with a network video recorder (NVR), though it also has a microSD card (up to 512 GB) slot for local recording. The footage is crisp at up to 4K with a 123-degree field of view, and there’s color night vision, with black-and-white and a spotlight as backups. Installation may be tricky as you must run an Ethernet cable, but that means no worries about power and no Wi-Fi woes. I tested the turret version, but this camera also comes in a dome or bullet shape. The motion detection is quite good, with minimal false positives, and the camera recognizes humans and vehicles reasonably accurately. Annke’s software is a bit clunky, though.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Safemo Set P1 (2-Pack) for $250: I love the idea of a simple kit like this, where you just plug the hub in, connect it to your router, and install the pre-paired cameras. Each has an optional solar panel to keep the battery charged. The Safemo app is well-designed, video goes up to 4K, and this entirely local system boasts 32 GB of storage (expandable up to 4 TB). It even has locally processed person, vehicle, pet, and package detection. The person detection was mostly accurate (it occasionally flagged my cat), and the vehicle detection flagged my robot lawnmower (close enough) and an inflatable donut that blew across the backyard, but false positives were rare. What prevents me from wholeheartedly recommending this impressive debut is the lack of 2FA (Safemo says it is coming) and connectivity issues, where one of the cameras would occasionally disconnect from the hub and be inaccessible in the app. This always righted itself without me moving anything, but worryingly, it happened a few times. If you plan to up the resolution to 4K from the default SD, you will need fast internet, especially to view the live feed, which I found was choppy and pixelated at 4K, though recorded videos were sharp and detailed.
Imilab EC6 Dual 2K WiFi Plug-in Spotlight Camera for $140: With dual 2K lenses, this security camera can cover a fixed spot and simultaneously track a subject. The bottom camera offers pan/tilt controls. It works via the Xiaomi Home app, making it an easier sell if you already have a Xiaomi phone or other gadgets from the Chinese brand. You can insert a microSD card for local storage or subscribe to cloud storage. The person detection and tracking worked well in my tests. The video was mostly crisp, but movement was sometimes a bit jerky, and fast-moving subjects can get blurry. It does have WDR, but could use HDR to prevent bright areas from blowing out.
Reolink Go PT Ultra for $230: If you need a wireless security camera that can connect to cellular 3G or 4G LTE networks, you could do worse than this offering from Reolink. It’s a pan-and-tilt camera that can record up to 4K video on a local microSD card (sold separately), or you can subscribe for cloud storage. It has a wee spotlight and decent color night vision, and it comes with a solar panel to keep the battery topped up. The detection is reliable, but it doesn’t always categorize subjects correctly. Loading time and lag will depend on the strength of the signal. Just make sure you check carrier compatibility and get a SIM card before you buy.
Swann AllSecure650 4 Camera Kit for $700: This kit includes four wireless, battery-powered cameras and a network video recorder (NVR) that can plug into a TV or monitor via HDMI. The cameras can record up to 2K, and footage is crisp and detailed enough to zoom in on, though there is a mild fish-eye effect. The night vision is reasonably good, but the two-way audio lags and sounds distorted. I like the option to view all camera feeds simultaneously, the backup battery in the NVR makes it a cinch to swap batteries when a camera is running low, and everything is local with no need for a subscription. Unfortunately, the mobile app is poor, camera feeds sometimes take several seconds to load, and there doesn’t seem to be any 2FA. The NVR interface is also clunky to navigate with the provided mouse.
Wyze Cam Outdoor V2 for $90: This was our budget camera pick, offering 1080p with a 110-degree field of view. It comes with a base station that takes a microSD card (not included) for local video recording. If you prefer the cloud, you can pay $24 per year for unlimited video length and no cooldowns, along with other perks like person detection. The stated battery life is between three and six months, but mine needed a charge before it reached three. This camera model was not one of those affected by the security flaw that Wyze failed to fix or report to customers for three years, but repeated security breaches from Wyze, exposing thousands of camera feeds to other customers, may still give you pause. We have started testing Wyze cameras again after the firm beefed up its security policies.
I have also tested the Wyze Cam OG ($30) and Wyze Cam OG Telephoto ($40), an interesting pair of affordable cameras that work well together. The OG gives you a 120-degree wide view and sports a spotlight, and the OG Telephoto has a 3X optical zoom. For example, you might have the OG cover your backyard and use the Telephoto to focus on the gate area, and you can set up a picture-in-picture view in the Wyze app. Both are IP65-rated, but if you want to use an outdoor socket, you have to buy the Wyze Outdoor Power Adapter ($16).
Don’t Buy These Security Cameras
I didn’t like every camera I tested. These are the ones to avoid.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Night Owl Solar Wi-Fi Battery Camera: Offering decent 2K video, a built-in solar panel to keep the battery topped up, and local storage on a microSD card or Night Owl hub (sold separately), this seems compelling for the price. Sadly, the app is a mess, and I ran into a weird issue immediately with account creation, where I got stuck in a loop of “Account doesn’t exist,” but it wouldn’t let me sign up with another email because my phone number had been used. I got around it with fresh details, but then the camera disconnected when I changed my router (same details) without any warning, and refused to reconnect until I reset it.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Vosker VKX: Sometimes you need a security camera in a location without Wi-Fi, so something like the Vosker VKX with 4G LTE connectivity could be handy. With a durable design, including a built-in solar panel, my first impression was good. The camera provided regular snapshots of my chosen test area at the far end of my backyard. You can schedule the camera, and it has a built-in deterrent light, but there is no subject recognition, so any motion will trigger it (you can tweak the sensitivity). The still images looked fine, but the video was choppy, with bright areas completely blown out. Sadly, you have to change modes to record video, and my video tests failed with no explanation around half the time. You cannot stream live video from this camera, and it requires an expensive plan (starting from $10 per month). The basic plan limits you to 500 alerts and just 10 downloads. You need to upgrade to Elite at $20 a month for unlimited alerts and 40 downloads. It seems like a terrible deal when any motion can trigger an alert.
Baseus N1 2K HD 2-Cam Kit: This kit from Baseus includes two security cameras and a base station with 16 GB of storage (expandable to 16 TB) for local recordings (no cloud option). The camera was easy to set up and sent alerts for most motion events, but the human detection was inaccurate, sometimes erroneously suggesting a human and sometimes ignoring actual people. The app is relatively barebones, and there is no 2FA. Although it does record up to 2K footage, the relatively low frame rate (15 fps) and lack of HDR can make for blurry, blown-out video. Tapping on notifications annoyingly does not load the video clip or the live view, making it slow to use. Baseus is new to security cameras, and it shows.
Noorio Spotlight Cam B210: This orb-shaped wireless security camera comes with a magnetic mount for easy positioning. The 2K video is reasonably sharp, but I found that bright sun completely blew out areas of the footage. The 16 GB of built-in storage is welcome, but I had some connection issues where the camera went offline without alerting me, and recorded clips sometimes refused to play back. I also tested the similar, cheaper B200 ($70), which maxes out at 1080p and has 8 GB of storage, and the more expensive Noorio Floodlight Cam B310 ($110), which adds a 600-lumen floodlight, but both cameras had the same connectivity issues.
Winees L1: This is an affordable outdoor security camera that comes with a solar panel, can record up to 2K video, and has 8 GB of storage onboard. There’s no need for a subscription, and it’s a pretty complete package. You even get on-board human, pet, and vehicle detection, though I found it a bit flaky. Unfortunately, this camera was often slow to start recording, so clips began with the subject halfway through the frame. The AiDot app that you use with this camera is also quite confusing, as it is designed to control a host of smart home devices.
Encalife Outdoor Wi-Fi Security Camera: This affordable tethered camera must be plugged into an outlet. It connects via Wi-Fi or Ethernet cable, offers reasonably clear 1080p footage, and has pan, tilt, and zoom capabilities. You can record locally on a microSD card (sold separately) or sign up for cloud storage, but the iCSee app is flaky and lacks 2FA, so I have concerns about how secure it is. I also tested the more expensive Encalife Smart Surveillance Camera, which adds two-way audio but relies on the same flawed app, and the Encalife 4G Security Camera, which employs the even worse CamHi Pro app.
Switchbot Outdoor Spotlight Cam: Simple to set up, this orb-shaped camera offers 1080p footage that is reasonably good quality, but it really struggles with mixed lighting, badly overexposing bright areas. There is decent night vision, a built-in spotlight, and two-way audio. You can also insert a microSD card up to 256 GB for local recording, which is just as well because the cloud subscription is far too expensive. Sadly, the busy app is flaky and sometimes drops or refuses to load the live feed. I liked the 5W solar panel option to keep the battery topped up, but you can get the same thing with better cameras than this.
Canary Flex: I love the curved lozenge design of the Canary Flex, but it is by far the most unreliable security camera I tested. It frequently missed people walking past altogether, or started recording when they had almost left the frame. Night vision and low-light video quality are poor, and the app is very slow to load.
What Do I Need to Know Before Buying a Security Camera?
Security cameras can be very useful, but you need to choose carefully. You might not be as concerned about potential hacks as you would be with indoor security cameras, but no one wants strangers tuning in to their backyard. Follow these tips to get the peace of mind you crave without infringing on anyone’s privacy.
Choose your brand carefully: There are countless outdoor security cameras on the market at temptingly low prices. But unknown brands represent a real privacy risk. Some of the top security camera manufacturers—including Ring, Wyze, and Eufy—have been breached, but public scrutiny has at least forced them to make improvements. Any system is potentially hackable, but lesser-known brands are less likely to be called out and often disappear (or change names) when they are.
Consider security: A strong password is good, but biometric support is much more convenient and secure. I prefer security cameras with mobile apps that support fingerprint or face unlock. Two-factor authentication (2FA) ensures that someone with your username and password cannot log in to your camera. Usually, it requires a code from an SMS, email, or an authenticator app, adding an extra layer of security. It’s an industry standard, but it’s still something you need to manually activate. I do not recommend any cameras here that don’t at least offer 2FA as an option.
Keep it updated: It’s vital to regularly check for software updates, not just for your security cameras and apps but also for your router and other internet-connected devices. Ideally, your chosen security camera has an automatic update option.
What Features Should I Look for in Outdoor Security Cameras?
There is a lot to consider when you are shopping for an outdoor security camera. It can be tough to determine which features you need, so here are some important questions to run through.
Video quality: You may be tempted to go with the highest-resolution video you can get, but this isn’t always the best idea. You can see more details in a 4K video, but high resolution 4K video requires much more bandwidth to stream and more storage space to record than Full HD (1080p) or 2K resolution. Folks with limited Wi-Fi should be cautious. You will generally want a wide field of view, so the camera takes in more, but this can cause a curved fish-eye effect at the corners, and some cameras are better than others at correcting for distortion. An important feature, particularly if your camera is facing a mixed lighting location with some shadow and direct sunlight (or a streetlight), is HDR (high dynamic range) support, as it can prevent light areas from blowing out or dark areas from losing detail. One last thing to consider on video quality is the frame rate. A low frame rate can cause artifacts and blurring with moving subjects, and anything below 20 frames per second is likely to be jerky.
Connectivity: Most security cameras will connect to your Wi-Fi router on the 2.4-GHz band. Depending on where you intend to install them, you may appreciate the support for the 5-GHz band, which enables the stream to load more quickly. Some systems come with a hub that can act as a Wi-Fi range extender. Bear in mind that you shouldn’t install a security camera in a location without a strong Wi-Fi signal.
Subscription model: Most security camera manufacturers offer a subscription service that provides cloud storage for video recording. It isn’t always as optional as it seems. Some manufacturers bundle in smart features such as person detection or activity zones, making a subscription essential to get the best from their cameras. Always factor in the subscription cost, and make sure you are clear on what is included before you buy.
Local or cloud storage: If you don’t want to sign up for a subscription service and upload video clips to the cloud, make sure your chosen camera offers local storage. Some security cameras have microSD card slots, while others record video to a hub device inside your home. A few manufacturers offer limited cloud storage for free, but you can usually expect to pay somewhere around $3 to $10 per month for 30 days of storage for a single camera. For multiple cameras, a longer recording period, or continuous recording, you are looking at paying between $10 and $20 per month. There are usually discounts if you pay annually.
Placement is important: Remember that a visible security camera is a powerful deterrent. You don’t want to hide your cameras away. Also, make sure the view isn’t peering into a neighbor’s window. Most cameras offer customizable zones to filter out recording or motion detection for areas of the camera’s frame. If you buy a battery-powered camera, remember that you will have to charge it periodically, so it has to be somewhat accessible. The ideal placement for security cameras is around 7 feet above the ground and angled slightly downwards.
False positives: Unless you want your phone to ping every time your cat wanders onto the porch or when the neighbor’s dog runs through your garden, consider a security camera that can detect people and filter alerts. Good cameras will also enable you to set privacy or activity zones.
Night vision and spotlights: Outdoor security cameras generally have infrared night vision, but low-light performance varies wildly. You always lose some detail when light levels are low. Most night vision modes produce monochrome footage. Some manufacturers offer color night vision, though it is often colorized by software and can look odd. We prefer spotlights, as they allow the camera to capture better-quality footage, and the light acts as a further deterrent to any intruder. But they aren’t suitable for every situation, and they drain batteries faster if not wired.
Camera theft: Concerned about camera theft? Choose a camera that doesn’t have onboard storage. You might also want to consider a protective cage and screw mount rather than a magnetic mount. Some manufacturers have replacement policies for camera theft, especially if you have a subscription, but they usually require you to file a police report and have exclusions. Check the policy thoroughly before you buy.
Is It Better to Have Wired or Wireless Security Cameras?
Wired cameras usually require some drilling to install, must be within reach of a power outlet, and will turn off if the power source does, but they never need to be charged. If you buy battery-powered security cameras, the installation is easier, and you can pick the spots you want. They usually run for months before needing to be recharged and will warn you when the battery is low, but that does mean you have to remove the battery, or sometimes the entire camera, to recharge it, which typically takes a few hours. It’s worth noting that you can buy solar panels to power some battery-powered cameras now, which gives you the best of both worlds.
Why We Hesitate to Recommend Ring
How We Test Security Cameras
I test every security camera for at least two weeks, but often far longer. I run through the installation process and note any issues. I check that alerts come through correctly to my phone when I am home, connected to Wi-Fi, or when I’m away and connected to a cellular network. I usually place two or more cameras in the same spot to compare picture quality, motion detection, and other features. I consider the image resolution, frame rate, and audio quality of videos and the live feed. I also check for lag with the live feed. I test the performance during the day and see how it copes with the sun facing the lens, and how it performs in the dark at night (testing both spotlight and night vision). I check how long the live feed and recorded videos take to load at different times of the day.
I play around with the settings in the app to try every mode and feature. I test any smart-detection features to see if they can correctly identify people. I test the two-way audio for a short conversation and try the siren where applicable. I also test local storage and cloud storage options for recording videos. If there are any smart-home integrations, I set them up and check how quickly the feed loads on a smart display. I always ensure that the cameras recommended support 2FA and test any additional security or privacy features.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
Tech
Amazon Drops Sam Altman Movie After Announcing OpenAI Partnership
Amazon MGM has dropped Luca Guadagnino’s nearly completed Sam Altman biopic Artificial and is seeking another distributor for the film. The move comes months after Amazon expanded its multibillion-dollar partnership with OpenAI, fueling speculation about a potential conflict given the movie’s reportedly unflattering portrayal of Altman. The Independent reports: Artificial would have marked the Oscar-nominated Call Me By Your Name director’s third Amazon film, following the critically acclaimed Zendaya-led tennis romance Challengers (2024) and the academic scandal drama After the Hunt (2025), starring Julia Roberts. The new movie is said to chronicle the brief period when Altman was abruptly ousted as OpenAI’s CEO in 2023 and subsequently rehired. Monica Barbaro and Ike Barinholtz star alongside Garfield as former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, while Yura Borisov, Cooper Hoffman, Jason Schwartzman, Cooper Koch, Billie Lourd, Zosia Mamet, Angus Imrie, Chris O’Dowd, Mark Rylance and Margo’s Got Money Troubles breakout Thaddea Graham round out the cast.
It is unclear exactly why the film was dropped, but according to Variety, the news came after it had already undergone positive screen tests. An early viewer told the publication that the film’s portrayals of Altman and newly minted trillionaire Musk are the two characters audiences would “like the least.” It was also reported that Amazon had already seen every early iteration of the script before Guadagnino was hired to direct. Altman and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos have developed a high-profile friendship over the years. In fact, the former was in attendance at Bezos’s wedding to Lauren Sanchez, which took place in Venice, Italy, in 2025. In recent months, the two have continued to deepen their professional partnership that began in 2015, when Amazon became one of OpenAI’s first investors. Ten years later, the companies closed their first major deal in November 2025, allowing the ChatGPT maker to run its systems on Amazon’s U.S. data centers.
Tech
Worlds collide at Amazon Spheres as pro-Palestinian group protests cloud giant’s Israel contracts

Carrying bullhorns and signs depicting Amazon executives as war criminals, about two dozen people protested outside the Amazon Spheres in Seattle on Thursday evening, calling on the company to stop providing technology to Israel for what they described as genocide in Gaza.
The protesters said they were trying to disrupt what they believed to be a gathering of Amazon executives, state and local leaders, U.S. State Department officials and Australian government representatives on an upper floor of the Spheres, on the eve of the World Cup match between the U.S. and Australia.
Contacted Friday, Amazon described the gathering differently. The company said the event underway during the protest was for members of Seattle’s business and sports communities, Australian parliamentarians, and Amazon employees celebrating the World Cup. A separate meeting concluded before the protests began, the company said, without specifying who attended that meeting.
“We respect individuals’ rights to engage in peaceful public demonstrations,” said Montana MacLachlan, Amazon spokesperson, in response to GeekWire’s inquiry. The company, she added, is “committed to being a responsible corporate citizen in the Puget Sound region, Washington state, and every community we serve.”
The protest group, which goes by the name Amazon Worker Intifada, described the protest as part of an effort to escalate pressure on the company’s leaders over the issues. An affiliated group, No Azure for Apartheid, has been protesting Microsoft for more than a year over its work for Israel.
The protesters object to Amazon’s work with Israel, including Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract that Amazon and Google won in 2021 to provide cloud and AI services to the Israeli government, including the Israeli military and weapons suppliers, according to leaked contract and procurement documents.
The protesters marched to the Spheres shortly before 6 p.m. Thursday, walking in a circle outside the glass-domed buildings with signs, drums, balloons, noisemakers and Palestinian flags, engaging in call-and-repeat chants such as, “Say it loud and say it clear — Amazon’s a war profiteer.”
Amazon workers and soccer fans walked by on the sidewalk, some stopping to take in the scene. Small groups of people in business attire walked through the protest to the Spheres entrance.
A banner at the edge of the space read “Amazon War Criminals Meeting Here.” Another depicted Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and AWS CEO Matt Garman, with blood on their hands, embracing what appeared to be a bomb. “We See Your Crimes,” it read.
Members of what appeared to be a wedding party, including a woman in a white bridal dress and a man in a suit, emerged at one point from one of the restaurants at the base of the Spheres and tried unsuccessfully to persuade the protesters to stop or move elsewhere.
In a press release after the protest, the group said its demonstration forced Amazon to reroute attendees, and that an arriving Australian delegation had to use a different entrance to get around the protesters. The group also said an event attendee grabbed and shoved a protester’s camera.
After protesting for an hour at entrances on both ends of the courtyard between the Spheres and Amazon’s Day One tower, the group moved to the Lenora Street side of the Spheres, where they released two helium balloons on strings with loud noisemakers attached, attempting to position the noisemakers outside the windows where an event could be seen taking place inside.
One of the leaders of the protest Thursday was Ahmed Shahrour, a Palestinian software engineer in Amazon’s Whole Foods division in Seattle who was fired in October over internal Slack posts criticizing the company’s ties to Israel.
Amazon said at the time that he violated multiple company policies, alleging that he “misused company resources, including by posting numerous non-work-related messages pertaining to the Israel-Palestine conflict.”
Shahrour called it “a blatant act of retaliation designed to silence dissent from Palestinian voices within Amazon and shield Amazon’s collaboration in the genocide from internal scrutiny.”
On Friday, Amazon spokesperson MacLachlan said of that incident, “We don’t tolerate discrimination, harassment, or threatening behavior or language of any kind in our workplace, and when any conduct of that nature is reported, we investigate it and take appropriate action based on our findings.”
No Azure for Apartheid, which includes current and former Microsoft workers, has staged repeated protests of its own, similarly calling on Microsoft to cut ties with Israel.
They set up an encampment on the Redmond campus last year, where 20 people were arrested for trespassing, and later occupied the office of Microsoft President Brad Smith. Microsoft has fired several employees over various protests and activities, citing violations of company policies.
After a Guardian investigation revealed that an Israeli military unit had used Microsoft’s Azure cloud to store millions of intercepted Palestinian phone calls, the company cut off the unit’s access and opened a review that recently led the company to announce that it would tighten its human-rights controls on its work with national security agencies.
Tech
Gen Z Singles Are Trying to Make ‘Solomaxxing’ Aspirational
For young people, the trend removes the stigma of being unmarried and alone, and recasts it as something to aim for, not avoid.
Tech
Top Apple tablets tested and ranked
Although there’s more competition than ever from the likes of Samsung, OnePlus and Honor, iPads still reign as some of the best tablet computers you can buy. Even if you are a longtime Apple fan however, it can be tricky to know which iPad is best suited for your needs given just how many options there are in 2026. If you’re tempted to upgrade or buy your very first iPad tablet then here are our current rankings.
One of the best things about buying an iPad in 2026 is that there’s a model to suit pretty much every use case and budget. For instance, the standard entry-level iPad is ideal for budget buyers, whilst the iPad Air is ideal for students who need a solid all-rounder for their studies. The iPad Pro is perfect for professionals who require all the power they can get, and the iPad Mini is made with artists in mind who love to draw and sketch throughout the day.
There are lots of great reasons to buy each for the aforementioned models but what unites them all is iPadOS. Easily the biggest reason as to why you should buy an iPad over one of the best Android tablets, iPadOS is unparalleled when it comes to offering a robust App Store filled with all of your go-to apps, alongside a UI that now allows for seamless multitasking.
iPadOS also comes into its own if you’re already part of the wider Apple ecosystem. AirPods of all varieties will immediately swap from your iPhone to your iPad depending on which device you’re using in the moment, and you can see health data collected via your Apple Watch as well.
There are plenty of other reasons as to why iPads are largely unbeaten in the tablet space, but the important thing to know is that this list can pair you with the model that makes the most sense for your needs so that you don’t inadvertently overspend. Keep reading to see which iPads impressed our team the most, or check out our round-up of the best tablets to see what Apple’s devices are up against. The best cheap tablets are also an instant win for anyone tied to a strict budget.
SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST
Every tablet in this list has been properly tested and used for an extended period of time by one of our product experts. We will never recommend a tablet to you that we haven’t personally used and put through a set series of tests. These tests can include colourimeter checks to gauge screen accuracy and brightness levels, various benchmarks to evaluate performance, and battery drains to judge endurance.
Our reviewer will also always judge performance for everyday use. This will see them use it as their primary tablet to conduct typical tasks like gaming, web browsing and video calling.
If the device is targeted at a specific market such as digital artists, they’ll also consider areas such as digital stylus support and whether it can effectively run relevant applications.
The performance of the mid-range iPad continues to improve
Improved connectivity
Two size options is always welcome
Great accessories
No ProMotion
Colour options are welcome, but a little drab
Even though it’s not the cheapest iPad in the range, the iPad Air is easily the best value option of the bunch given just how much you get in return for your money, especially with the new iPad Air M4. This is a tablet that boasts iPad Pro-levels of power but without the hefty price tag that typically comes with it.
Apple fans may remember that the launch of the iPad Pro M4 was a big deal as it was the first Apple device anywhere to feature the M4 chip, leapfrogging the various MacBooks available at the time. Well, that power has now trickled down to the iPad Air range and it blows pretty much every other tablet around the £599/$599 mark out of the water.
You probably won’t notice that much up an uptick if you own the iPad Air M3, but compared to older M-series chips it’s a big leap. Multitasking happens without issue and you can indulge in fairly heavy-duty video and photo editing without ever seeing where the limits are. It’s all very impressive for a tablet, and it’s made even better with the Magic Keyboard in tow. There’s also improved connectivity in this iPad Air with the N1 network chip which adds Wi-Fi 7 for faster internet speeds as you work. Of course, for as great as the iPad Air is for productivity, it still remains a solid entertainment device with a bright, vibrant screen that really shows off some impressive detail when streaming the latest shows on Apple TV.
It would have been nice for Apple to finally bring the 120Hz ProMotion display down to the iPad Air range in a similar fashion to the entry-level iPhone 17, but it’s so much of an issue to detract from how much fun the tablet is to use on a daily basis.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208285
Upgraded base RAM
Wi-Fi 7 support
The best screen on any tablet
iPadOS is getting better and better
Give us some fun colours
A fairly minor update
If you want the absolute best that Apple’s iPad lineup has to offer, the iPad Pro M5 is it.
Loaded with premium hardware, the finest screen you’ll find on any iPad, and performance that genuinely impresses. It’s also the best-looking tablet money can buy right now. Thin, light, and supremely sleek, the design carries over from the previous generation, and that’s no bad thing.
Under the hood, however, things have moved on. A new M5 chip handles everything from casual browsing to demanding creative work without breaking a sweat, and an N1 networking chip joins the party too.
The specific chip configuration varies depending on which storage tier you go for, but every version of the Pro M5 delivers serious power. Apple has also bumped the base RAM up to 12GB, a genuine step up from the 8GB found in the older model, and the difference is felt in day-to-day use. iPadOS has matured significantly as well, and the software now feels worthy of the hardware it runs on.
What truly sets the Pro apart from something like the Air is the screen. That OLED panel remains in a league of its own, hitting peak brightness of 1600 nits with rich, accurate colours and excellent HDR support. Whether you’re watching films, editing photos, or cutting video, it looks stunning throughout.
The design is a massive upgrade
USB-C is far more convenient than Lightning
Smart front camera placement
Unbeatable tablet apps and software
Huge price jump, especially in Europe makes its position in Apple’s iPad range confusing
Odd Apple Pencil integration
64GB isn’t enough (256GB probably too much)
Apple’s baffling decision to increase the price of the iPad in its 10th generation made the tablet tricky to recommend at launch. However, a recent drop down to $329/£329 has pulled the iPad 10 back to an affordable price, making it our go-to budget iPad once again.
The iPad has taken design queues from the pricier iPad Air, including flat edges, slimmer bezels and the absence of a home button. The tablet is also 10g lighter and chargers via USB-C, meaning it can share its charger with more devices.
While the 10.9-inch Liquid Retina Display lacks the P3 colour gamut and anti-glare coating found on higher-end iPads, it still has a higher resolution than that of the iPad 9, making it an easy upgrade compared to its predecessor, while producing a sharp, colourful image.
There’s a 12-megapixel rear camera for snapping photos and scanning documents, along with a 12-megapixel ultra-wide front camera that now sits on the long edge for holding video calls in landscape orientation. The A14 Bionic chip delivers strong performance, including a noticeable improvement in gaming performance and video export times compared to previous generations. The RAM is up from 3GB to 4GB too, though the storage remains lacking with 64GB being the base configuration.
The 10-hour battery life is in line with most iPads, while Apple Pencil and Magic Keyboard Folio compatibility makes the iPad 10 a very versatile device.
Great new design
Works with the second-gen Apple Pencil
Super-speedy thanks to the A15 Bionic chipset
5G option makes for great portability
Odd storage sizes
Expensive
Some iOS elements are too small
The iPad Mini 6 won’t be everyone. It’s expensive, lacks the Magic Keyboard support of the Air and Pro and suffers from slightly inferior battery life. However, if you’re after a small iPad for watching videos, reading or note-taking then this is still an option we’re happy to recommend,
Most of the features here are stripped from the iPad Air series. It mirrors that slate’s design, colour choices and screen tech. However the performance isn’t quite as high-end, so it scores lower in benchmark tests. In real-world use though, it’s still very snappy in all ways.
The smaller 8.3-inch display makes this a different proposition from the iPad Air. It’s less of a laptop replacement and more of a companion; a media-centric device that fits in smaller bags. Pair it with the Apple Pencil (2nd gen) and you’ve got a fantastic mini notebook and sketchpad. The smaller display also makes it great for gaming, especially if you pair up a Bluetooth controller.
We found that the battery life is a little shorter than the iPad Air, but at least there’s a USB-C port on the bottom.
No, no iPad can natively run Mac apps – even if you have an M1 iPad and the app is built for an M1 Mac. Instead, all apps for an iPad must come from the App Store.
The original Apple Pencil has a glossy finish and charges by plugging directly into an iPad’s Lightning port – though no iPad in our list supports this older accessory. The Apple Pencil 2nd Gen charges wirelessly and has a matte finish. Any iPad with a USB-C port will support this Pencil. The new Apple Pencil Pro, with support for rotation and squeeze gestures, will only work with the latest iPad Air and iPad Pro M4 due to the relocation of the magnets within the iPad chassis.How we test all the iPads we review
FAQs
Test Data
Apple iPad Air M4
Apple iPad Pro M5
Apple iPad (10th gen)
iPad Mini 6
Geekbench 5 single core
–
–
1557
1594
Geekbench 5 multi core
–
–
3190
4687
Geekbench 6 single core
3726
4081
–
–
Geekbench 6 multi core
13286
16441
–
–
Geekbench 6 GPU
52607
74536
–
–
3DMark Solar Bay
12727
–
–
–
sRGB
–
–
–
90 %
Adobe RGB
–
–
–
62.8 %
DCI-P3
–
–
–
64 %
Max brightness
–
–
467 nits
439 nits
1 hour video playback (Netflix, HDR)
–
3 %
6 %
6 %
30 minute gaming (intensive)
–
–
7 %
9 %
30 minute gaming (light)
–
–
5 %
8 %
1 hour music streaming (online)
–
–
–
1 %
1 hour music streaming (offline)
–
–
1 %
1 %
Time from 0-100% charge
–
–
120 min
–
GFXBench – Aztec Ruins
60 fps
60 fps
–
–
GFXBench – Car Chase
60 fps
60 fps
–
–
Full Specs
Apple iPad Air M4 Review
Apple iPad Pro M5 Review
Apple iPad (10th gen) Review
iPad Mini 6 Review
UK RRP
£599
£999
£349
£479
USA RRP
$599
$995
$349
$499
EU RRP
–
–
€439
€559
CA RRP
–
–
–
CA$649
AUD RRP
–
–
–
AU$749
Manufacturer
Apple
Apple
Apple
Apple
Screen Size
11 inches
11 inches
10.9 inches
8.2 inches
Storage Capacity
128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB
64GB
256GB, 64GB
Rear Camera
12MP
12MP
12MP
12MP
Front Camera
12MP
12MP
12MP
12MP
Video Recording
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
IP rating
No
No
IP57
No
Battery
28.93 Whr
31.29 Whr
–
19.3 Whr
Fast Charging
Yes
Yes
–
Yes
Size (Dimensions)
x x INCHES
x x INCHES
179.5 x 248.6 x 7 MM
5.3 x 7.69 x 0.25 INCHES
Weight
462 G
446 G
477 G
293 G
ASIN
–
–
B0BJLG85NS
B09G9LDWYQ
Operating System
iPadOS 26
iPadOS
iPadOS 16.1
iPadOS 15
Release Date
2026
2025
2022
2021
First Reviewed Date
09/03/2026
16/06/2026
–
08/10/2021
Resolution
2360 x 1640
2420 x 1668
1640 x 2360
2266 x 1488
HDR
–
Yes
Yes
Yes
Refresh Rate
60 Hz
120 Hz
60 Hz
60 Hz
Ports
USB-C
Thunderbolt / USB 4 port
USB-C
USB-C
Chipset
Apple M4
Apple M5
Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm)
A15
RAM
12GB
12GB, 16GB
4GB
12GB
Colours
Blue, Purple, Starlight, Space Grey
Grey, Silver
Silver, Blue, Pink, White
Space Gray, Pink, Purple, Starlight
Tech
7,000 Langflow servers are under attack. LangGraph and LangChain have the same holes
Your AI agent did exactly what it was designed to do. The framework underneath it just handed an attacker a shell on the box that holds your OpenAI key, your database credentials, and your CRM tokens.
That is not a hypothetical. In a few months, three of the most widely deployed AI agent frameworks each turned a known, ordinary bug class into a way through. Check Point Research chained a SQL injection in LangGraph’s SQLite checkpointer to full remote code execution. Tenable and VulnCheck tracked a path traversal in Langflow’s file upload endpoint to active, in-the-wild RCE. Cyera documented a path traversal in LangChain-core’s prompt loader that reads your secrets off disk. Two paths to a shell, one to your keys. They are the same bug, wearing three frameworks.
These frameworks became production infrastructure faster than anyone secured them. They store agent state, take file uploads, load prompt configs, and hold the credentials to databases, CRMs, and internal APIs. The edge tools watch traffic. The endpoint tools watch processes. Neither was built to treat an imported framework as a boundary worth guarding, and that blind spot is exactly where all three chains live, widening every week as these frameworks ship to production.
The LangGraph chain, SQL injection to a Python shell
Start with the one most teams pulled into production this quarter. LangGraph gives AI agents memory through checkpointers, the persistence layer that stores execution state. It has cleared over 50 million downloads a month. Yarden Porat of Check Point Research took that layer apart and found three vulnerabilities. Two of them chain to RCE.
CVE-2025-67644, rated CVSS 7.3, is a SQL injection in the SQLite checkpointer. The function that builds the WHERE clause for checkpoint lookups drops user-controlled filter keys straight into the query with no parameterization and no escaping. This does not hit everyone, but where it hits, it is serious. A deployment is exposed when it self-hosts LangGraph on the SQLite or Redis checkpointer and lets untrusted input reach get_state_history() or a similar history endpoint. Meet those conditions, and an attacker who controls the filter writes a fabricated row straight into the checkpoint table. Run LangChain’s managed LangSmith platform on PostgreSQL, and the exposure is gone.
Then CVE-2026-28277, CVSS 6.8, finishes the job. LangGraph’s msgpack checkpoint decoder rebuilds Python objects from the stored data, which lets it import a module and call a named function with attacker-supplied arguments. That step needs write access to the checkpoint store; the SQL injection is what grants it remotely. LangGraph loads the forged row as a legitimate checkpoint, the decoder runs the specified function, including os.system, and code executes under the identity of the agent server. A third issue, CVE-2026-27022, CVSS 6.5, reaches the same place through the Redis checkpointer.
There has been no confirmed exploitation in the wild yet. A working proof-of-concept is public in Check Point’s disclosure. The fixes are version bumps: langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite to 3.0.1, langgraph to 1.0.10, and langgraph-checkpoint-redis to 1.0.2.
The Langflow chain, one unauthenticated request to RCE
Langflow is the one already under attack. CVE-2026-5027, CVSS 8.8, is a path traversal in the POST /api/v2/files endpoint, which takes the filename straight from the form data and writes it to disk unsanitized. An attacker packs that filename with traversal sequences and drops a file anywhere, such as a cron job in /etc/cron.d/. Because Langflow ships with auto-login enabled in its default configuration, an exposed instance needs no credentials at all. A single unauthenticated request reaches the endpoint, and the next cron run hands over a shell.
VulnCheck’s Caitlin Condon confirmed exploitation on June 9: “Our Canaries observed exploitation of CVE-2026-5027 that successfully leveraged the path traversal to write what appear to be test files on victim systems.” Censys put roughly 7,000 exposed instances on the internet, most in North America. This is the third Langflow flaw to draw active exploitation this year, after CVE-2025-34291, which the Iranian state-sponsored group MuddyWater weaponized and which CISA added to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog in May. CVE-2026-5027 itself was patched in version 1.9.0, released April 15.
The timeline is what sets the clock. The patch shipped April 15. Attacks started in June, and VulnCheck added CVE-2026-5027 to its exploited-vulnerabilities list June 8 once its sensors caught the first in-the-wild hits. Every instance left unpatched between those two dates has been sitting in the open for almost two months. The lesson for security teams is to start the patch clock at disclosure, not at a federal catalog entry.
The LangChain-core gap, arbitrary file reads through the prompt loader
LangChain-core, the foundation under both, disclosed CVE-2026-34070, CVSS 7.5, a path traversal in its legacy prompt-loading API. The load_prompt() functions read a file path out of a config dict with no check against traversal sequences or absolute paths, so an attacker who influences that path reads arbitrary files the process can reach, including the .env file holding OPENAI_API_KEY and ANTHROPIC_API_KEY. Cyera paired it with CVE-2025-68664, CVSS 9.3, a deserialization flaw that resolves environment secrets through a crafted object. The fix versions differ, which matters when you patch: CVE-2026-34070 lands in langchain-core 1.2.22 and 0.3.86; CVE-2025-68664 lands earlier in 1.2.5 and 0.3.81. Clear both, or the higher-severity flaw stays live behind a patched one.
Three frameworks, three classic AppSec bugs. Path traversal. SQL injection. Unsafe deserialization. Nothing exotic, nothing AI-specific, just old vulnerabilities living inside new infrastructure. None of this is a frontier-model problem. It is plumbing, sitting in the layer where AI meets the enterprise.
Why the scanner cannot see it
Merritt Baer, CSO at Enkrypt AI and former deputy CISO at AWS, has named what makes this kind of failure hard to see coming. It does not announce itself as an AI problem. “CISOs will experience MCP insecurity not in the abstract, but when an employee pastes sensitive data into a tool, or when an attacker finds an unauthenticated MCP server in your cloud,” Baer told VentureBeat. “It won’t feel like ‘AI risk.’ It will feel like your traditional security program failing.” The framework chains here are the same shape. An exposed Langflow instance is an unauthenticated server in your cloud, and the alert, if one fires, reads like an ordinary incident.
That is the gap in one sentence. The exploit lives in the framework your code imports. The WAF never sees a msgpack decoder running three layers down. The EDR watches the agent server make the same process calls it makes a thousand times a day and waves it through. Both tools are doing their job. Nobody scoped the framework itself as the thing that could turn on you.
The root cause is older than AI, and Baer names it. “MCP is shipping with the same mistake we’ve seen in every major protocol rollout: insecure defaults,” she told VentureBeat. “If we don’t build authentication and least privilege in from day one, we’ll be cleaning up breaches for the next decade.” Langflow’s auto-login is that mistake shipped. LangChain-core’s unguarded prompt loader is that mistake shipped. The convenient default is the vulnerability. And the moment an agent connects to anything, that risk compounds. “You’re not just trusting your own security, you’re inheriting the hygiene of every tool, every credential, every developer in that chain,” Baer said. “That’s a supply chain risk in real time.”
There is a governance failure layered on top of the technical one, and it is the same miscategorization Assaf Keren, chief security officer at Qualtrics and former CISO at PayPal, has flagged in adjacent tooling. “Most security teams still classify experience management platforms as ‘survey tools,’ which sit in the same risk tier as a project management app,” Keren told VentureBeat. “This is a massive miscategorization.” Swap in AI agent frameworks, and it still holds. Teams file LangGraph, Langflow, and LangChain under developer convenience, then wire them into databases, CRMs, and provider keys. “Security has to be an enabler,” Keren said, “or teams route around it.” These frameworks are what routing around it looks like.
Follow the money and it points at the same layer. On its Q1 fiscal 2027 earnings call, CrowdStrike reported its AI detection and response line up more than 250% sequentially, and on June 17 it extended that runtime coverage to agent, LLM, and MCP traffic on AWS. George Kurtz, the company’s co-founder and CEO, named the reason in plain terms: “Agents run on the endpoint. They make tool calls, access files, invoke APIs, and move data at the process level.” That is the exact plumbing these chains abuse, and real money is now moving to the layer your AppSec scan skips.
What to put in front of the board
The board does not need the CVE numbers. It needs the consequence, and Keren draws the line the board cares about. Most teams have mapped the technical blast radius. “But not the business blast radius,” Keren told VentureBeat. “When an AI engine triggers a compensation adjustment based on poisoned data, the damage is not a security incident. It is a wrong business decision executed at machine speed.” A framework RCE is the same problem one layer earlier. The agent does not just leak a credential; it acts on production systems with it, and the business sees an outcome no one can explain.
So frame it the way a board frames it: we run AI agent frameworks in production that can be turned into remote shells through bugs our scanners are not built to find, all three are patched, one is under active attack, and here is the date every instance is verified and closed. None of this required custom malware or a zero-day.
The six-question checklist
Six trust boundaries, one per row, each with the question, the proof point, the command, the fix, and the board line. Run it tonight.
|
Trust-Boundary Question |
Proof Point |
What Broke |
Verify Before You Install |
The Fix |
Board Language |
|
1. Can the agent’s state store be poisoned with code? |
LangGraph SQLi-to-RCE chain. CVE-2025-67644 (CVSS 7.3) chains into CVE-2026-28277 (CVSS 6.8). PoC public, no in-the-wild use yet. |
Filter keys interpolated into SQL with an f-string. Forged checkpoint row hits the msgpack decoder, which imports and runs an attacker-named callable. |
pip show langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite. Below 3.0.1 = vulnerable. Confirm get_state_history() is not exposed to network input. |
Upgrade langgraph-checkpoint-sqlite to 3.0.1, langgraph to 1.0.10, langgraph-checkpoint-redis to 1.0.2. |
“Our agent memory layer can be tricked into running attacker code. Vendor has patched it. We are upgrading and confirming the endpoint is not exposed.” |
|
2. Can an unauthenticated request write a file to our agent server? |
Langflow CVE-2026-5027 (CVSS 8.8). On VulnCheck KEV (June 8). Active exploitation confirmed June 9. ~7,000 exposed instances (Censys). |
Path traversal in POST /api/v2/files. Filename unsanitized. Auto-login on by default. Two HTTP calls drop a cron job and earn a shell. |
Query Censys or Shodan for your Langflow, Flowise, n8n, and Dify instances on the perimeter. Check whether auto-login is enabled. |
Upgrade Langflow to 1.9.0+. Disable auto-login. Pull AI dev tools behind VPN or zero-trust. Isolate port 7860. |
“Our AI dev tools are reachable from the internet with login off. This exact flaw is under active attack now. We are pulling them behind access controls today.” |
|
3. Can our prompt loader read files it should never touch? |
LangChain-core CVE-2026-34070 (CVSS 7.5), path traversal in the prompt-loading API. Paired with deserialization CVE-2025-68664 (CVSS 9.3). |
load_prompt() reads a config-supplied path with no traversal check, returning files such as the .env holding OPENAI_API_KEY and ANTHROPIC_API_KEY. |
pip show langchain-core. Below 1.2.22 (1.x) or 0.3.86 (0.x) = vulnerable. Audit any code passing user-influenced paths to load_prompt(). |
Upgrade langchain-core past both fixes: 1.2.22 / 0.3.86 (CVE-2026-34070) and 1.2.5 / 0.3.81 (CVE-2025-68664). Replace load_prompt() with an allowlisted directory. Run as non-root. |
“Our prompt system could be steered to read our API keys off disk. We are patching and removing the legacy loader.” |
|
4. Does a compromised framework hand over every credential at once? |
These frameworks are often deployed with provider keys, database credentials, and integration tokens available to the process environment. Cyera documents the credential-exfiltration path. |
One RCE on the agent server exposes every secret the process can read. Blast radius is the full credential set, not one app. |
Inventory which secrets each framework process can reach. Confirm keys come from a secrets manager, not static .env files. |
Move provider keys to ephemeral injection. Rotate any key a vulnerable instance could have read. Scope each key to least privilege. |
“A single break in one AI framework exposes the keys to every model and data store it touches. We are rotating and scoping them now.” |
|
5. Are these frameworks running outside security governance? |
A prior Langflow flaw, CVE-2025-34291, was weaponized by Iranian-linked MuddyWater and added to CISA KEV in May. Shadow AI is the new shadow IT. |
Teams stand frameworks up for speed, give them credentials, and never bring them under review. The security team cannot see what it does not know exists. |
Run a discovery sweep for AI frameworks outside change management. Map each to an owner and an approval record. |
Assign every framework a documented owner and a place in the approval process. Offer a sanctioned alternative so teams do not route around you. |
“We have AI frameworks in production that no one formally approved. We are bringing them under governance, not banning them.” |
|
6. Can our scanners even see inside the framework at runtime? |
Runtime detection is forming around this layer: CrowdStrike Falcon AIDR expanded to AWS June 17 (Bedrock, Kiro, Strands); its QuiltWorks coalition now covers cloud workloads. |
WAF reads HTTP at the edge. EDR watches the endpoint. By default, neither reliably models a msgpack decoder or a prompt loader three layers down in an imported framework as a separate trust boundary. |
Test whether your AppSec scan covers third-party framework internals. Track CVEs by dependency, not just by what your edge tools can parse. |
Add framework dependencies to vuln management. Treat agent output and stored state as untrusted. Patch on disclosure, not on KEV listing. |
“Our scanners check our code, not the frameworks our code imports. We are closing that blind spot and patching on disclosure, not waiting for the federal catalog.” |
How to read this table: each row is one trust boundary, left to right, from the question to ask to the line to read your board.
Give the board the deadline, not the technology
The fixes are not a re-architecture. They are version bumps and config changes you can land this week. The exposure is the gap between the day the patch shipped and the day your team runs the checks, and right now that gap is measured in months. The frameworks did exactly what they were built to do.
Tech
The Most Promising Ebola Vaccine Has Been Sitting on the Shelf for 15 Years
“We thought that’s probably the one that’s least likely to pop up,” Geisbert says. “We guessed wrong.”
Concerned by that knowledge gap, in 2011 he decided to modify a vaccine, which led to the crab-eating macaque study. In the same study, he also finally tested a blend of existing ebola vaccines on the Bundibugyo strain, but they didn’t provide 100-percent protection.
If the 2012 outbreak had occurred after the major Zaire outbreak, Geisbert says, it’s possible pharmaceutical companies might’ve been more keen to commercialize a vaccine that protects against the Bundibugyo strain.
But with the present outbreak rivaling the 2013 to 2016 one in terms of scale and scope, efforts to play catch-up are going into high gear. Geisbert suspects WHO’s experience with Ervebo is one of the reasons they favor his vaccine candidate, which is basically “Bundibugyo Ervebo,” he says.
WHO also noted the success of a similar rVSV-based vaccine targeting the Sudan strain of ebola in a ring vaccination trial in 2025.
The rVSV-based Bundibugyo candidate’s suitability for ring vaccination was backed by a 2023 study showing most of the monkeys were protected from the virus even after they were exposed if they had been vaccinated. That is crucial for ring vaccination to work. While the researchers vaccinated the monkeys an unrealistically quick 20 minutes after exposure, the proof of concept sets it apart from Moderna and the University of Oxford’s candidates under development.
“There hasn’t really been much development since that 2023 study, because we weren’t really expecting to see that strain and also because historically it’s been associated with lower-rate mortality as well,” said Courtney Woolsey, the lead author on the paper (Geisbert was a coauthor) and an assistant professor within the University of Texas Medical Branch.
“Nobody really makes money off these vaccines,” she adds, “so there are funding barriers as well to advance these vaccines where people likely aren’t going to make money.”
The nonprofit Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations has offered funding of up to $3.2 million to prepare and start testing the material needed to manufacture Gesbert’s vaccine, which would be the first step towards human trials.
The “extensive safety data and prior regulatory experience” from the rVSV-based vaccines used to combat the Zaire strain “could help expedite approval pathways if it is shown to be successful,” Rachael Bonawitz, filovirus disease programme lead at CEPI, tells WIRED over email, adding that developers would also be able to build on existing manufacturing processes.
“Even if it’s not used in this outbreak, hopefully there will be clinical material that can be used in humans available for the next outbreak,” Geisbert says, “because it will probably pop up again.”
Even as it shows promise, there is still a chance his vaccine won’t work. Scientists have not been able to obtain a live Bundibugyo virus sample for testing due to stretched resources in the DRC and the logistical and bureaucratic complexity of obtaining and transporting refrigerated blood back to the US. While scientists believe the current strain is around 98-percent similar to the strain that caused the previous outbreaks, that unknown 2 percent presents a risk the vaccine won’t be as effective as it was against the previous strain.
“When you look at the sequences it’s not different enough that I would predict that there would be a problem, but nothing’s foolproof,” Geisbert says.
The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative in New York will prepare the vaccine candidate for production. The nonprofit biomedical research organization focuses on developing vaccines for global diseases where there is little financial incentive for development.
“The baton has been handed off, and I just sit back and hope that it works, whether it’s the vaccine, whether it’s somebody else’s vaccine,” Geisbert says.
Tech
Aura’s impressive e-ink photo frame doesn’t even look digital
What’s the most cliche possible gift you can give a relative? A digital photo frame, displaying a rotating slideshow of family photos. Now Aura has completely refreshed this product space with its gorgeous Aura Ink frame, which uses e-ink to create a display that doesn’t even look digital.
Digital frames have always been so popular (yet mostly disappointing) because there’s an undeniable allure to the idea of them — it feels like magic to imagine hanging artwork on your wall that you can change depending on your mood. In practice, these devices usually look clunky. You need to plug them in and figure out how to hide a bulky cord, and does anyone even want another bright screen in their home anyway? This problem was already on the Aura founders’ minds when they started the company 10 years ago, but color e-ink wasn’t feasible until now to use in a digital frame.
“E-ink is definitely next level,” co-founder and CTO Eric Jensen told TechCrunch. “We have people tell us that they hung it up, had friends over, and their friends were like, ‘How did you print that picture so quickly?’”
E-ink is the same technology that you see on e-readers, which lets you read a book without feeling the same strain that you get from staring at an LED screen for too long. But there aren’t that many color e-ink devices on the market aside from the Kindle Colorsoft, because the company that manufactures e-ink displays can only currently produce six colors: red, blue, green, yellow, white, and black.
It’s hard to imagine what your favorite family portraits and travel photos would look like with only six colors. But Aura has created a dithering algorithm — a technique that blends a limited color palette into patterns the eye reads as smooth gradients — that renders images close enough to the originals that its e-ink frame could finally go to market.
“I’m learning color theory from our chief scientists, and as far as I understand it, there’s not a good definition for how many colors this represents well,” Jensen said. “It’s all sort of theoretical and comes down to how people perceive it. Everyone’s a little different, so it’s actually taken a lot of testing with a lot of people in a lot of different spaces and different lighting conditions in order to get where we are today.”

All of Aura’s frames connect to the Aura app, which is where you can upload photos from your phone, web, email, iCloud, or Google Photos. I found the process to be pretty user-friendly — easy enough for a less tech-savvy relative to navigate, which matters for a product that lives or dies on whether non-technical users will actually set it up.
The app also has social features, so if your sister has a great new photo of her baby, she can upload it to your shared library and it will appear on your frame. (I didn’t try this, since I don’t know anyone else with an Aura frame, but if I did, I would probably use this feature to prank my family members with ridiculous photos. Am I a bad person?)
In addition to the 13.3-inch Ink frame, Aura also sent me its more classic, 12-inch LED Aspen frame as a point of comparison. But the LED frame surprised me with how good it looks in its own right (it feels like the Prada of digital frames). The lighting is about as unobtrusive as an LED screen can be, and it’s anti-glare, which makes the frame look way more premium. Aura’s frames also benefit by surrounding the LED screen with a paper-like matting display, which helps trick the eye into reading it as a printed photograph.
Aura says it designed its dithering algorithm for portraits of people, since users tend to highlight family photos. I’m a rebel, so I decided to load my frames with travel photos. When comparing the same photo on the Ink and the Aspen, it’s very clear that the colors aren’t exact, but as a digital photographer who isn’t that picky, I didn’t care very much. The distorted color palette almost seems like an artistic choice, even if I know it’s reflective of a technological limitation. But when I showed the two Aura frames to an analog film photographer who painstakingly studies the small color aberrations in his darkroom prints, he thought that the Ink frame needed some work. I disagree, but if you look at the photos below and are bothered that the white balance isn’t perfectly consistent across each of the three image from my phone, then you might not like the Ink frame.

By default, the Ink frame changes photos once per day, and it will usually do this change in the middle of the night, when you’re least likely to be paying attention. If you manually change the pictures via the app, do not be alarmed if the frame looks like it’s glitching — it takes about a minute for the hardware to run the dithering process and render the six-color, e-ink version of your image.
I am very bad with anything involving hammers and nails — all of the art in my apartment is hung up using Command strips — but mounting hardware that Aura includes feels sturdy. It’s easy to take the frame on and off the wall, but you probably only will need to take it down to charge the frame via USB-C once per month. (When the lights are off or you’re not in the room, the display will go to sleep, helping save battery.) I don’t think that the Ink frame looks too out of place, but if it does, maybe it’s because it’s surrounded by art made in other mediums. Or maybe it’s the black frame. Or I did a bad job at placement. Look, I can’t help that I added the Ink frame to a gallery wall that I assembled three years ago!

At $499, I wouldn’t call the Ink frame cheap (the Aspen runs $229, by the way). But aside from its color inconsistencies — which you can argue are more of a feature than a bug — I’ve loved having the Ink frame on my wall. With the unavoidable technical limitations of e-ink in mind, it’s hard for me to imagine how Aura could’ve made a better product.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Tech
Go eyes robotaxis and acquisitions after Japan’s biggest IPO of 2026. Here’s why it matters
Go’s IPO — Japan’s biggest so far this year — has done more than provide a much-needed boost to the country’s languishing listing season. It has also supplied the taxi-hailing app with the capital required to address an existential issue: Japan’s shortage of drivers.
Go, which went public Tuesday, plans to use the ¥88.6 billion ($553 million) raised in its IPO to expand its robotaxi business and make acquisitions, according to a company spokesperson.
“We intend to use the proceeds from the sale of newly issued shares toward investment in research and development related to robotaxis and investment in business expansions, including strategic mergers and acquisitions in our business inside and outside of the taxi industry,” the spokesperson said.
The Japanese taxi-hailing company’s debut came in one of Japan’s quietest listing seasons, at a time when the government has been telling startups to sell themselves rather than go public. Go drew investments from BlackRock, Wellington Management, and M&G Investment Management in the process, underscoring where global institutional money is willing to go in Japan right now. The stock has since pulled back below its offering price, closing at ¥2,314 on Friday, down about 4% from the IPO price of ¥2,400.
Go’s robotaxi ambitions are rooted in a human problem. Japan’s taxi industry is running out of drivers. The number of taxi drivers has fallen roughly 20% in recent years, according to a report citing Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.
An aging population means that figure is unlikely to recover. Ride-share services launched in Japan in 2024, but remain limited to certain areas and require drivers to be employed by a taxi company; restrictions that have done little to address the shortage.
Go was founded in 1977 as a taxi operator and now runs Japan’s largest ride-hailing app with 35 million downloads, 85,000 partner vehicles, and an 80% share of Japan’s taxi app market by usage time, covering 46 of Japan’s 47 prefectures.
Go believes robotaxis will be part of its future — although it’s not clear when that vision will become a reality.
Go has partnered with Waymo, an autonomous driving subsidiary of Alphabet, alongside Nihon Kotsu, one of Japan’s biggest taxi operators. Go is responsible for strategic coordination of the partnership, according to the spokesperson. CEO Hiroshi Nakajima has previously said that Go will not invest in autonomous driving systems itself, according to Nikkei Asia.
Go has not set a timeline for fully driverless operations.
“We plan to begin driving fully autonomously, without a human specialist present, when we validate our technology and receive approval to do so,” the spokesperson said.
In the meantime, Go is looking for ways to give its traditional business a competitive edge. For instance, the company has partnered with Kakao T, Alipay, and WeChat Pay that allows inbound travelers from South Korea, China, and Taiwan to hail Go-affiliated taxis directly from their local apps.
Go is not the only company betting on Tokyo’s robotaxi future.
In March, Uber, Wayve, and Nissan announced plans to pilot robotaxi services in Tokyo by late 2026, marking Uber’s first autonomous vehicle partnership in Japan. The service will use Nissan Leaf electric vehicles powered by Wayve’s AI Driver, and will be bookable through the Uber app.
Uber has also teamed up with S.Ride to let international visitors book rides through the Uber app. Didi Mobility Japan, a joint venture between SoftBank and Didi Chuxing, has a similar arrangement.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Tech
Honor of Kings Introduces Hero Devara and Launches HOK Plus 2.0 in India
Honor of Kings is increasing its reach in India through the release of HOK Plus 2.0. This update comes with various enhancements, including more rewards, improved gameplay, creator programs, and esports developments. Another feature of this update is a new character named Devara, who draws inspiration from Indian culture.
Honor of Kings is rolling out a ₹10 million reward program for its users in India with the launch of HOK Plus 2.0. Through “Play to Earn”, players will be motivated to play the game, create content, participate in campus activities, and socialize. Players will get the opportunity to participate in the Treasure Hunt game and stand a chance of winning smartphones and Amazon gift cards. Honor of Kings will give even greater rewards to players as part of its celebration on June 27.
Devara Debuts as Honor of Kings’ New India-Inspired Hero
HOK Plus 2.0 will introduce Devara, a hero inspired by India, in the game Honor of Kings. Devara battles at the Clash Lane and uses his lightning abilities when he is battling. He is able to deal massive damage and perform well from the front line. Honor of Kings has been inviting people to suggest Hindi lines for their heroes. Some of these lines have been selected and used in Devara’s voice lines, which were recorded by Sanket Mhatre.
The launch of Devara will be marked by a range of offline events in Delhi, Mumbai, and Bengaluru. These will allow gamers to experience themed activities and engage with other players. The events aim to celebrate the hero’s debut and strengthen the game’s connection with its Indian player community.
HOK Studio Expands Support for Indian Content Creators

HOK Plus 2.0 introduces new opportunities for content creators through HOK Studio. The new creator policy rewards content creators for strong performance and regional rankings. Selected creators can move into the HOK Advanced Creator Program and receive exclusive benefits. The company has also partnered with Live Insaan to support community growth. Players will soon be able to join influencer-led teams in the HOK India Influencer Team Tournament.
Honor of Kings is also bringing new activities to campuses and gaming cafes across India. The campus program will cover 32 colleges in four cities between July and September. Students will have opportunities to compete, create content, and engage with the community. The game will also organize Devara-themed 1v1 challenges at selected gaming cafés. Participants can earn rewards and compete for cash prizes and smartphone giveaways.
Revenant XSpark has qualified to represent India at the 2026 Asian Games Esports Qualifiers. The team claimed its place by winning the NESC 2026 LAN Grand Finals held in Pune. The competition in Kuala Lumpur brings together top teams from across the region. Successful teams will secure spots at the 20th Asian Games in Nagoya, Japan. Their qualification showcases the progress of India’s Honor of Kings esports ecosystem.
New Heroes, Gameplay Modes, and Quality-of-Life Improvements
There are new updates in Honor of Kings to enhance its gameplay through HOK Plus 2.0. The players can get familiar with Annette, Lorion, and Florentino in Arena of Valor. Users can discover Super Flow Brawl 2.0 and apply strategic thinking and gameplay mechanics in this mode. There are even certain events happening during the match to affect its flow.
June 27 marks the date of the Peak Day festival, where players in Honor of Kings will have various opportunities to get rewarded during the event. Participants in the event will be able to engage in specific activities, collaborations, and community events at the festival. There are limited-time vouchers and unique collectibles for the participants. The participants will have access to free heroes and bonuses at the festival.
Tech
LEGO Builds a Life-Size Koenigsegg Sadair’s Spear Megacar That Hits 69 MPH

Collaboration between LEGO and Koenigsegg built a vehicle that turns heads for all the right reasons. The two companies created a full-scale version of the Sadair’s Spear using LEGO Technic pieces, and the finished machine drives under its own power on real roads and courses.
Over 327,906 unique components went into this massive effort, which resulted in an automobile weighing a whopping 1800 kilos, despite the fact that the bricks themselves only accounted for about 400 kg. The long and laborious procedure came to a conclusion after almost 9,400 hours of work, when the team gave their approval and declared it ready for testing.
Sale
LEGO Technic Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut Grey Hypercar, Sports Car Building Set for Boys and Girls, Vehicle…
- A hypercar toy for kids ages 10 and up – This LEGO Technic Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut Grey Hypercar car building toy set for kids features authentic…
- Build the features of this sport car toy – Builders explore lots of engineering concepts as they assemble the articulated V8 engine and the…
- Realistic door design – The model features a dihedral synchro-helix door system, which allows the doors to rotate 90 degrees while moving outwards…
The entire car is built from the ground up on a lightweight body made of LEGO Technic pieces, while a custom-made chassis underneath handles all structural stresses and houses the electric motor and complex mechanisms that bring this cool car to life, and then there’s that one show-stopping feature we can’t get enough of. The car has a working Ghost Mode, a trick that the real hypercar does as well, in which the rear body portion lifts up, the dihedral synchro-helix doors swing out on their own, and the mirrors fold flat.



The next challenge came on the Goodwood hillclimb track in the United Kingdom. Markus Lundh, the test driver, drove the brick-built automobile up the famed incline in reverse configuration, reaching a high speed of 111 kilometers per hour, or 69 miles per hour in the United States. This figure more than twice the previous record for the fastest drivable LEGO car manufactured by the LEGO Group.



Markus said he had a great time driving the thing; it reminded him of the time he got the Sadair’s Spear to the top of that hill the year before, but when he took the LEGO version up, he was particularly impressed with the engineering that the Technic team did. The massive life-size creation corresponds with a new official 1:8 scale LEGO Technic model of the same car, which has 4,104 pieces and reproduces many of the same features, but at a scale that allows it to be displayed on a desk or shelf. The smaller counterpart also includes a working Ghost Mode sequence, a detailed V8 engine with moving parts, a 9-speed transmission that moves, and suspension at both ends.
-
Business5 days agoNo Jackpot Winner as $257 Million Prize Rolls Over to $269 Million Monday Draw
-
Crypto World5 days agoZimbabwe Requires Crypto Businesses to Register Annually Under New FIU Regulations
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitget enters Argentina’s regulated crypto market through PSAV registration
-
Tech7 days agoNanoClaw integrates JFrog registries to secure AI agent downloads
-
Entertainment5 days agoMatt Damon’s Viral Sci-Fi Thriller Has Taken Over HBO Max
-
Business5 days agoAnthropic staff to meet White House officials next week, Axios reports
-
Tech5 days agoAs AI companies race to go public, who else is along for the ride?
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin could crash to $48,000, if this historical pattern is triggered
-
Politics5 days ago“Israel’s” ban on ICRC visits ruled illegal, but Knesset moves to stop them permanently
-
NewsBeat5 days agoWarning of disruption as Cardiff Crossrail works to start
-
News Videos5 days agoFinancial Accounting | Last Day Revision Strategy and Booster | CMA Inter – June 2026
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTributes to former deputy head teacher at Cambridge school among death and funeral notices
-
NewsBeat5 days agowhat doctors are seeing in ebike crashes
-
Entertainment6 days agoDeion Sanders Shares Powerful Post After Viral Advice To Deiondra
-
Entertainment5 days agoKate Middleton Glare Goes Viral After Kids Booed At Royal Event
-
Crypto World5 days agoXRP ETFs Outperform As Bitcoin And Ethereum Funds Extend Outflow Trend
-
Crypto World5 days ago
Market Preview: SpaceX (SPCX) IPO Record, Federal Reserve Meeting, and Iran Nuclear Agreement
-
Tech5 days agoOver 400 Arch Linux packages compromised to push rootkit, infostealer
-
Business5 days agoInvesco Quality Income Fund Q1 2026 Commentary
-
Entertainment7 days ago44 Years Later, This Is the Greatest Star Trek Quote in Sci-Fi History












You must be logged in to post a comment Login