Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

A Model For HHS: New Mexico Measles Outbreak Was Curtailed With Mass Vaccination Campaign

Published

on

from the no-shit dept

With RFK Jr. and his version of HHS entirely out to lunch on the ongoing measles issue in America, it’s been left to states and local medical professionals to try to figure out how to do combat with one of the most infectious diseases on the planet. In a sane world with a real, big boy executive branch, HHS would be taking the lead on this sort of thing. Since Kennedy’s eugenics-lite belief system promotes a “survival of the fittest” mentality instead, we get to examine how different states and local governments react to measles outbreaks. South Carolina, for instance, appears to be largely uninterested at the governmental level in doing anything at all about the failure in data-sharing, case-reporting, and combating the bullshit religious exemptions to vaccinations that led to a loss of herd immunity to begin with.

New Mexico, which suffered its own measles outbreak last year, went the opposite route. And when you compare that state’s response specifically to Texas’, as they were both part of the same outbreak, the lessons learned are even more instructive.

Texas declared the outbreak within its borders over on August 18, with an end tally of 762 cases. In New Mexico, officials declared its outbreak, which began in February, over on September 26, with a total of just 99 cases.

One of the key differences, according to a new study, was that in New Mexico, the rapid spread of the highly infectious virus spurred a massive surge in measles vaccinations among children and adults. Overall, shots of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine increased 55 percent statewide from January to September compared to the same period in 2024.

This is all based on a recent CDC study. I simply must point out that it’s quite interesting to see this uptick in vaccinations. It’s what I’ve advocated for, of course, but it certainly calls into question the reasoning for having not vaccinated before the reports of the outbreak. If these were more religious exemptions, did people suddenly become less religious? If it was fear of all the nonsense dangers RFK Jr. warns about with the MMR vaccines that kept them from vaccinating before, are they suddenly less afraid now? Or was all of that performative excuse making for people not wanting to get a simple shot in their arm?

Advertisement

Regardless, it was a coordinated effort by New Mexico government groups and local doctors to be transparent about the outbreak, its dangers, and mobilize for mass vaccinations.

In the MMWR report, officials explained that they had a data-driven response effort that assessed local vaccination coverage and real-time vaccine inventories and targeted mobile vaccination delivery. They went all out on communication, releasing 12 health advisories to clinicians, 26 press releases to the public, and 184 social media posts. They also launched a regularly updated measles outbreak data page with information in English and Spanish. Finally, they set up a measles helpline, which got over 2,000 calls during the outbreak. The officials noted that their response to the outbreak was built on lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In all, “the strategies implemented in New Mexico could serve as a model for other states that are addressing measles cases or outbreaks,” they concluded.

Or, gee, I don’t know, how about it being a model for the federal fucking agency with a charter that centers on keeping Americans healthy and combating infectious diseases? Why is this left to the states to figure out? States can be laboratories for democracy all we like, but infectious diseases don’t respect state borders.

Instead of spending time licking his wounds from his recent losses in federal court, it sure would be nice if Kennedy could spend that time actually getting involved in combating measles, a disease that could only be resurrected thanks to the misinformation he spewed for decades.

Advertisement

Filed Under: cdc, health & human services, measles, new mexico, outbreaks, rfk jr., texas, vaccines

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

AI nailed emergency diagnoses better than doctors in Harvard trials

Published

on

AI has plenty of messy use cases, but emergency medicine may be one place where it can do some real good. A Harvard study comparing AI performance against doctors using patient data from emergency-room cases revealed that OpenAI’s o1 reasoning model outperformed human doctors in emergency triage diagnosis, especially in cases where decisions had to be made quickly with limited information.

What did the test reveal?

A part of the Harvard trial included 76 patients who arrived at the emergency room of a Boston hospital. The AI model and two human doctors were given the same electronic health record, including basic details like vital signs, demographic information, and a short nurse-written note explaining why the patient had come in.

The AI managed to identify the exact or near-exact diagnosis 67% of cases. Meanwhile, the human doctors scored between 50% and 55%. In the second test, more detailed information was provided, which caused the AI’s accuracy to rise to 82%. On the other hand, the humans scored between 70% and 79%. It is worth noting that this gap was not statistically significant.

Why doctors aren’t being replaced yet

The premise of this study revolves around text-based medical reasoning, and not the full reality of emergency care. Researchers note that AI did not assess a patient’s distress, appearance, tone, body language, or other real-world signals doctors use in the actual ER.

Dr Adam Rodman, another lead author and a doctor at Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, said AI could become part of a “triadic care model” involving the doctor, patient, and AI system.

While the results are impressive, the technology isn’t ready to be dropped into emergency rooms just yet. Experts raised concerns over accountability, patient safety, AI errors, and whether doctors may start deferring too quickly to AI recommendations. As of right now, it can only be good enough to offer second opinion when doctors need one fast.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

People are finally using Reddit’s search

Published

on

After being harried by complaints that its search function needed improving, Reddit has in the last few years invested in its search engine, and has even added AI features to help its users find what they’re looking for. It appears that investment is finally paying off: The company has seen a 30% year-on-year jump in the number of people using search every week, CEO Steve Huffman said on Thursday.

Huffman noted that search has been one of the major drivers of user acquisition and retention for the platform.

“On search, we have seen great performance. Search DAUs, WAUs, and queries are up meaningfully year-over-year. It’s a great driver of retention and DAUs. The search team is, quite frankly, I think doing a great job. If you use Reddit Answers, you can see it is better integrated into the product,” he said on the company’s first quarter post-results conference call.

Earlier in February, the platform started testing product placement through AI search results in the U.S.

Advertisement

Huffman said that around 40% of conversations on Reddit are commercial in nature, and 84% shoppers feel more confident in their buying decisions after researching on Reddit.

The social platform ended the quarter with more than 493 million weekly active unique users (WAUq), up 23% from the same period last year, and about 126 million daily active unique users (DAUq), a 17% improvement from a year earlier.

Reddit reported a 7% improvement in U.S. visitors, reaching 53.5 million DAUqs, and 73.3 million DAUqs internationally, a 26% increase. The company said it plans to reach a billion daily users worldwide and 100 million daily users in the U.S.

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

Besides search, the company said its machine translation feature, which now supports over 30 languages, has driven significant user growth in the past few quarters.

Advertisement

Reddit reported revenue of $663 million in Q1 2026, beating Wall Street’s expectations of $609.8 million. The company also said it only spent $1 million in capital expenditures in the quarter.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

S’pore added 5K jobs in Q1, but hiring and salary plans are cooling

Published

on

MOM just released its latest advanced quarterly labour report & employers are showing signs of caution

Singapore’s labour market continued to expand in Q1 2026, but employers are showing early signs of caution as they tighten hiring plans, according to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM)’s latest advance quarterly labour market report released today (Apr 30).

The report, based on preliminary data, found that the city-state added 5,000 jobs in the first quarter of 2026, extending an 18-quarter growth streak.

While this was higher than the 2,300 jobs added in Q1 2025, it marked a sharp slowdown from the 17,700 jobs recorded in Q4 2025.

MOM attributed the softer pace largely to seasonal factors and a high base in the previous quarter, rather than a broad-based weakening in labour demand. It noted, for instance, that construction activity typically slows during the Chinese New Year period.

Advertisement

At the same time, the share of firms planning to hire in the next three months fell from 54.6% in Feb to 44.6% in Mar. The proportion of firms expecting to raise salaries in the next three months also dropped from 39.3% to 25.4% over the same period.

Earlier this month, the Monetary Authority of Singapore warned that the business outlook had softened and employment growth would likely ease from 2025’s gains because of the Middle East conflict.

MOM noted that hiring sentiment has yet to recover to Feb levels before the conflict began, despite early signs of stabilisation in April.

“This suggests a more measured pace of hiring and emerging caution among firms, with potential softening if external conditions weaken,” said MOM.

Advertisement

Employment growth among Singaporeans and permanent residents for Q1 2026 was concentrated in sectors such as transportation and storage, and administrative and support services, while non-resident employment growth continued to be driven by the construction sector.

Meanwhile, unemployment rates remained low and broadly stable. The overall rate edged up to 2.1% in Ma, from 2% in Dec 2025. Among citizens, the rate rose to 3.1% from 3% in the previous quarter.

Some 3,700 workers were retrenched in Q1 2026, up from 3,590 a year ago, and 3,690 in the last quarter of 2025. For every 1,000 employees, 1.5 people were retrenched in the Jan to Mar period, the same as the last quarter.

“Retrenchments were stable or declined across most sectors, with a majority occurring due to business reorganisation or restructuring,” said MOM.

Advertisement

The full labour market report for Q1 2026 will be released by MOM in mid-Jun.

Job market forecast

Looking ahead to Q2 2026, the labour market is expected to remain tight and continue to expand, said MOM.

However, geopolitical tensions and increased economic uncertainty are also expected to make businesses cautious about hiring and wages.

Commenting on MOM’s report, Callam Pickering, senior economist at Indeed, said: “An uncertain business environment, both in Singapore and globally, will make it more difficult for Singapore businesses to plan ahead and understand their staffing needs.”

Advertisement

Pickering also noted that labour demand also shows signs of deterioration, with job postings on Indeed down 2.8% in Mar, compared to the end of last year, continuing a three-year downward trend in hiring demand.

Nonetheless, he pointed out that the job market “continues to be healthy,” with unemployment and retrenchment figures still low. “We expect the job market to weaken this year, but strong fundamentals will help Singapore weather the storm,” Pickering reflected.

  • Read more articles we’ve written on Singapore’s job trends here.

Featured Image Credit: Shadow_of_light/ depositphotos

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Nissan Abandons Plans For US EV Plant

Published

on





Nissan has abandoned a $500 million plan to build all-electric vehicles at its Canton, Mississippi assembly plant, the company said in a statement to Automotive News. The automaker will instead shift production to conventional gasoline and hybrid vehicles at the 4.7-million-square-foot facility. It made the move to “better align with market conditions, customer demand and Nissan’s updated strategic direction,” Nissan told AN in a statement. 

As part of “Ambition 2030,” Nissan announced in 2021 that it would retool its Canton facility to build EVs along with batteries for multiple Nissan and Infinity models, with the aim of selling 200,000 EVs in the US by 2028. Tepid US EV sales and the Trump administration’s elimination of the $7,500 federal tax credit caused the company to rethink that plan, though. 

Last year, Nissan cancelled the Ariya electric crossover in the US along with two electric sedans, and now, the automaker has completely dropped its plan to expand Canton, where all its US EVs including the upcoming PZ1K were to be built. The company has three US manufacturing plants (Canton, Smyrna, TN and Decherd, TN), but only made one EV — the Ariya — in the US. 

Advertisement

Instead, it will manufacture ICE and hybrid vehicles at that facility, starting with a new body-on-frame Xterra, set to arrive in the US by 2028. That will be followed by the three-row Nissan Frontier and at least three other models, all built using the same platform.

Other manufacturers in the US including Ford and GM have also cancelled or scaled back EV programs, focusing instead on hybrid or ICE vehicles. In other parts of the world including Asia and Europe, however, EV sales are hitting new highs in the face of record gas prices caused by the US war with Iran. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

I held off on the MacBook Neo. I hope the next one fixes these 5 papercuts before I plonk cash

Published

on

The MacBook Neo stopped me in my tracks, not because it’s a beautiful piece of tech that appeals to the enthusiast inside me. It’s the overall pitch that Apple puts on the table — aluminum build, efficient silicon, and great battery life — all at an implausible price tag of $599. I wanted to experience it, and I almost bought it a couple of weeks ago. 

But I didn’t. And it wasn’t because Neo is a bad machine. I got to experience the device for a couple of days (thanks to my friend who splurged his money on it), and the more I dug into what Apple had left out to hit the astonishingly low price, the more I felt like pushing my purchase until the Neo gets better. 

5 things I want the next MacBook Neo to fix

Because here’s the thing: I get most of the trade-offs. What I don’t understand, however, is why some of the cuts were made in the first place, as they’re more about snatching away the iconic MacBook experience than saving costs for the company. So, dear Apple, fix these five things on the next MacBook Neo, and I’ll have my wallet out before you guys start accepting pre-orders. 

Spec MacBook Neo (2026)
Chip Apple A18 Pro (6-core CPU, 5-core GPU)
RAM 8GB unified memory (not upgradeable)
Storage 256GB / 512GB SSD
Display 13-inch Liquid Retina, 2408×1506, 500 nits, 1 billion colors
Battery Up to 16 hours
Ports 2x USB-C (left: USB 3, right: USB 2)
Camera 1080p FaceTime HD
Connectivity Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth
Starting Price $599 ($499 education)

A19 Pro could help push the performance ceiling

For a first-generation device, the MacBook Neo does really well with Apple’s A18 Pro chip (borrowed from the iPhone 16 Pro, with one less GPU core). I was surprised at how well it handles everyday tasks like browsing, emailing, and, most importantly, multitasking with a dozen different Chrome tabs. 

But here’s why I pumped the brakes. The A18 Pro holds its own at day-to-day tasks, but due to the lack of additional cores compared to the M-series, it runs behind in intense workflows like photo editing, graphic designing, or even coding.

Advertisement

This is where a better, more powerful chip could help the Neo up its game, not just for immediate gains, but to keep the Neo relevant for the next four or five years, especially as AI-driven tasks would require even more computational power

The good news? Apple is already working on putting the A19 Pro (from the iPhone 17 Pro) inside the next iteration, and I’ll take that all day. The chip brings meaningful upgrades across the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine, and should enhance the overall Neo experience.

It’s Apple’s optimization that’s doing the heavy lifting here, not 8GB of RAM

I’ll give credit where it’s due. It isn’t just the 8GB of physical RAM on the MacBook Neo doing the heavy lifting. It’s Apple’s iron grip over hardware and software optimization (including temporary swap-in memory) that makes browsing, streaming, and general multitasking feel like a breeze on the Neo.

However, the moment I pushed it by running multiple apps simultaneously, like Chrome (with over two dozen active tabs) with Apple Music, and added FaceTime to this combination, the memory ceiling became apparent. Unlike a Windows laptop, where upgrading RAM is an option, with MacBooks, what you buy is what you live with.

In my opinion, the device is aimed squarely at first-time laptop buyers: students, new professionals, and people looking for a secondary on-the-go device, and it serves them quite well. But with the unavoidable memory slowdown, 8GB of RAM isn’t going to cut the mustard forever.

For me, more RAM doesn’t just solve the immediate multitasking bottleneck; it solves the longevity problem, too. Fortunately, the A19 Pro chip is rumored to bring 12GB of unified memory as a standard on the next Neo, and that should’ve been the baseline from day one.

Advertisement

I type in the dark every single day

While the other things are not immediately apparent, this one baffled me right when I unfolded the thing for the first time. The Neo skips the backlit keyboard, a feature so standard in 2026 that even budget Windows laptops don’t think twice about it.

Apple’s workaround is the color-matched keyboard with lighter keys across all four finishes, and sure, the display’s glow does a decent job of illuminating the keys. However, it’s no workaround for a good old backlit keyboard, which even my M1 MacBook Air has, not only because it looks cool at night, but because it makes finding the function keys a whole lot easier. 

I can’t stress enough how much a backlit keyboard would help the Neo’s target audience: students working on assignments late at night, frequent travelers working on the go, in dimly lit plane seats or train compartments, or people like me, who’d rather work outside at night than be cooped up indoors. 

The trackpad doesn’t feel like it’s on a MacBook

One of the most distinctive aspects of MacBooks, a hallmark of every MacBook for nearly a decade, is the haptic trackpad. It was one of the features that wowed me before my first-ever MacBook purchase, and calling it anything but iconic would be a mistake. And the Neo, somehow, doesn’t have it. 

Instead, it has a mechanical trackpad that clicks like a budget Windows laptop or Chromebook, and that’s exactly what I’ll never expect or accept, not from Apple. Don’t get me wrong, though. The Neo’s trackpad works just fine, but the moment you use it after using another MacBook, the difference is impossible to miss.

And while we’re at it, paywalling Touch ID on a higher storage tier is something that didn’t sit well with me either, but I’ll let it pass given that it isn’t something I use as often as the keyboard and the trackpad.

Advertisement

The USB 2 port doesn’t come in handy while transferring files

It could be while someone is trying to offload their iPhone’s data on the MacBook, or getting pictures or videos of a vacation via an external storage drive, that Neo users would notice how tremendously slow the USB 2 port on the device is (the one closer to the trackpad). 

And it adds up faster than anyone would think. Even a 20GB iPhone backup that takes minutes via a USB 3 connection will have you wait for about half an hour on USB 2. For people who are always working, trying to be productive around the clock, that feels like the deepest cut. 

I’m not asking for a Thunderbolt port, but both ports running at USB 3 speeds is, in my opinion, a reasonable ask in 2026. 

Feature Current State on Neo What’s Needed
Chip A18 Pro, binned from iPhone 16 Pro A19 Pro for better CPU, GPU & Neural Engine performance
RAM 8GB, fixed — no upgrade path 12GB as a baseline, not a premium tier
Keyboard Backlight No backlight — color-matched keys as a workaround Standard backlit keyboard, like every other MacBook
Haptic Trackpad Mechanical click trackpad, no Force Touch Force Touch haptic trackpad — an iconic MacBook staple
USB-C Ports Left: USB 3 / Right: USB 2 (effectively decorative) Both ports at USB 3 speeds minimum

Bottom line

None of these things is a dealbreaker at $599, and not even a question at $499 with education pricing. To Apple’s credit, the Neo is one of the most impressive first-generation devices I’ve seen and used in a long time.

Clearly, it’s the years of experience in making MacBooks that help the company. What annoys me, however, is when the Neo starts feeling like it’s one-upping the competition rather than staying true to its Apple roots. 

The chipa nd RAM upgrades are already rumored, and I’m cautiously excited about them. But if anyone at Apple is reading this, please bring back the backlit keyboard, haptic trackpad, and bring both ports to the same USB 3 standard. Do that, and the next MacBook Neo will have something more than my attention — my money.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Amazon’s new AI shopping podcasts are going off the rails

Published

on

Amazon is giving product pages the podcast treatment, and it’s as useful as it sounds. This might sound like a neat new trick till you hear what some of these AI “hosts” are actually discussing.

The company recently expanded its “Hear the highlights” feature with a new interactive mode called “Join the chat.” This feature lets shoppers listen to AI-generated audio summaries about the products they are viewing, and even ask questions by text or voice while the audio is playing. It added a layer of interactivity, with these AI hosts being capable of pausing and answering in real time. But that’s where the handy idea ends, and the bizarre bit starts.

How the early examples are already strange

Amazon’s Hear the highlights creates short audio conversations about key product features, who a product might be good for, and what shoppers should know before buying. The feature basically pulls from product details, customer reviews, and other publicly available information.

In practice, a quick audio summary could help save time and cut through the mess of shopping pages. But the problem is that products do not always deserve a cheery mini-podcast.

Futurism highlighted examples originally surfaced by Business Insider’s Katie Notopoulos, including an AI-generated shopping discussion about adult diaper rash cream. In another example, the feature reportedly generated enthusiastic commentary for a fake dog poop product, praising details like its size and realism. At this point, it becomes an automated infomercial machine rather than a helpful shopping assistant.

Advertisement

Useful idea with an awkward execution

Amazon is trying to make the system more conversational. The company is already pushing AI deeper into its retail experience. Rufus is one such example, functioning as an AI shopping assistant that offers product summaries.

Asking whether a humidifier works with essential oils, or whether earbuds are good for calls, can be genuinely helpful. But this is unintentionally funny when it is applied across odd, intimate, or novelty products.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Kia’s PV5 Electric Van Now Launches a Drone for South Korean Police Duty

Published

on

Kia PV5 Korean National Police Agency Build Drone
Officers from the Seoul police force pull up in a crowded alley, where the sound of feet echoing between the buildings is almost deafening, in their high-tech vehicle powered by the quiet electric power of its motors, before, like a jack-in-the-box, a panel at the top of the roof slides open and a sleek little drone rises up to scan the lay of the land from above. This is Kia’s latest project, and it was developed in close collaboration with the Korean National Police Agency, with experimental operations due to begin in only a month.



The PV5, a practical electric vehicle built to navigate busy delivery routes and complete tasks, served as the foundation. Kia built on the same sturdy base and electric power as before, but included all of the safety elements required by the police. The paint job is stylish black and white, with large blue and yellow markings that clearly indicate the van’s duty while parked at a scene. A big light bar runs along the top of the van, flashing as needed, and despite all of the extra equipment, the overall design remains clean and modern, with the standard bright LED lighting still in place.


DJI Neo 2 (Drone Only), Lightweight & Foldable 4K Drone With Camera, Palm Takeoff & Landing, Gesture…
  • Lightweight & Portable Design – Weighing just 151g [9] and C0 certified, this compact drone features full-coverage propeller guards for safer…
  • Palm Takeoff & Landing [1], Gesture Control [2] – Enjoy easy palm takeoff and landing, plus intuitive gesture controls for hands-free operation and…
  • Smooth & Reliable Tracking – ActiveTrack [3] keeps your subject in focus, while Apple Watch lets you view live feed, check flight status, or use voice…

The game changer is the top section, which is an extended housing that remains hidden until the police need it. Then a panel slides back, a platform appears, and the drone, which is equipped with a thermal imaging camera and can zoom in 90 times, takes off, all while the officers remain in the vehicle. It’s a fairly slick piece of gear, and once it’s finished exploring the area, the drone flies back down to the roof and recharges directly from the van’s electrical system.

Kia PV5 Korean National Police Agency Build Drone
The van is equipped with three high-resolution cameras, providing officers with 360-degree surveillance. Even as the van is traveling through traffic, the cameras continue to film, and all of the footage is relayed to screens within the cargo area, allowing cops to view what’s going on from the comfort of their seats. To make things even better, the installed software does some really intelligent things, such as identifying persons in a crowd based on their clothing, detecting anyone with a weapon, and alerting anyone on the ground who may require medical assistance. Even growing smoke or sudden crowd pressure are detected, and the crew receives an instant alert.

Kia PV5 Korean National Police Agency Build Drone
A 71.2-kilowatt-hour battery powers the entire operation, along with a zippy electric motor producing 161 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. The standard driving range is roughly 350 km (217 mi), however, as expected, the top structure adds considerable wind resistance, reducing the total in police trim. Don’t worry, Kia left the battery and drivetrain alone, so the van retains superb efficiency and plenty of power.

Kia PV5 Korean National Police Agency Build Drone
The project’s true goal was to provide the police with the tools they needed to complete their duties without putting more officers in danger. The Korean National Police Agency sought to respond faster in congested urban areas and have a better understanding of what was going on without endangering more lives. This means it will be deployed as part of the Metropolitan Preventive Patrol Unit, where the crew will test it on real-world streets beginning in June.
[Source]

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

A Flying Taxi Just Took Its First Trip Through The Skies Of New York

Published

on





Electric flying vehicle manufacturer Joby just achieved a milestone in its quest to bring electric air taxis to reality. On April 27th, a Joby electric air taxi completed its first point-to-point flight in New York City, flying between JFK airport and various heliports dotted around the city.

A press release from Joby notes that this is the first time an electric vertical takeoff air taxi has performed a point-to-point flight in New York City. That’s a very specific superlative, but it’s a big deal for Joby as it demonstrates that the technology is viable for use as transportation.

Advertisement

Joby’s goal is to create electric air taxis that generate fewer emissions than conventional helicopters and other aircraft. Additionally, Joby’s aircraft are purported to generate less noise, which is probably a relief for New Yorkers. The company intends to work with its subsidiary, Blade, as well as Uber and Delta Airlines, to coordinate future flights if (or when) its flying taxi enters full service.

Advertisement

An electrifying development

Joby’s aircraft itself looks like a big drone and flies sort of like a V-22 Osprey. It’s capable of taking off vertically using its six motors and then pivoting the rotors to fly horizontally. Joby states that it has a top speed of 200 mph and can hit a maximum ceiling of 10,000 feet, perfect for short flights around big cities. Through its lithium-ion batteries, it has a reported range of just over 150 miles on a charge.

It has a carbon fiber airframe and a total weight of 5,300 pounds when carrying a pilot and four passengers. That makes it a little heavier than a more conventional helicopter like the Bell 505, which has a max gross weight of 4,475 pounds with an external load. Joby’s recent NYC test was part of the FAA’s pilot program for air-taxi testing, but it’s not yet known when Joby’s air taxi will go public — or, at least, as public as a likely expensive air taxi ride can ever be.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs Review: Pruning made way easier

Published

on

Verdict

A brilliant, lightweight and powerful tool, the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs can cut through branches up to 25mm thick, and last for up to 2000 cuts on a single charge, making them fast and easy to use for even large pruning jobs.

  • Simple to use

  • Very powerful

  • Far quicker than manually cutting

  • Expensive compared to manual secateurs

Key Features

Introduction

If you’ve got a lot of pruning to do, particularly with thicker branches, the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs is for you. This lightweight, battery-operated tool makes it easy to quickly cut through branches up to 25mm thick, making short work of any job.

Advertisement

Sure, they’re much more expensive than a manual set of secateurs, but given how easy they make life, they’re well worth the outlay.

Advertisement

Design and features

  • Uses the 10.8V AS battery system
  • Two cutting settings
  • Useful LCD

Stihl’s rapidly growing its range of tools powered by its AS 10.8V battery system. Taking in everything from the Stihl GTA 26 pruner to the Stihl BGA 30 Cordless Blower, the range is designed to be light and easy to use.

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs batteryStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs battery
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

That battery system is particularly well-suited to handheld tools, such as the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs that I have on review here, with the tiny battery not adding much weight and keeping this tool firmly within the one-hand category.

Yes, the ASA 20 is heavier than a manual set of secateurs, at just under 1kg with the battery, but the weight is well distributed, and I’ve used the set for long periods without even really thinking about it.

Build quality is as you’d expect from Stihl, with a reassuring feel to it. This is a product that’s designed to last.

Advertisement

Advertisement

It’s thoughtfully designed, too. There’s a cover for the blades, so you can store the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs safely. It’s a rugged plastic cover that clicks neatly into place.

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs close upStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs close up
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The battery goes into the handle, clipping into place. If you don’t have an AS 2 battery already, you can buy the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs with a charger and battery; if you’ve got other tools, then you can choose to buy these clippers as a barebones system instead.

Using the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs is easy. First, you need to power them on using the dedicated power button.

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs power buttonStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs power button
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Once there’s a beep, the secateurs are ready to use. Following the handy sticker on the side, two squeezes of the trigger open the blades ready for action; holding the trigger in for three seconds switches between to the two cutting widths (19mm and 25mm); holding the trigger for five seconds closes the blades, so you can power the system down.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs control informationStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs control information
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The current cutting mode is shown on the handy LCD, which also shows you the current cut count. 

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cut countStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cut count
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

To use the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs, just line them up, squeeze the trigger and let the motor do the rest. It’s that easy, and there’s absolutely no fatigue in using them.

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cuttingStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cutting
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

There’s only a basic battery meter on this, with three LEDs that extinguish one at a time. 

Advertisement

Every 4000 cuts, Stihl says that the blades should be oiled with Stihl Multioil Bio, and the company recommends getting the product serviced annually.

Performance

  • Fast to use
  • Cuts through thicker branches with ease

Using the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs is a joy. With simpler cuts, such as deadheading a buddleia, I found this tool far faster than using a manual pair of secateurs. 

The controls are very intuitive. With a progressive cut, the blade only moves as far as the trigger is pulled, so as soon as you’re through a branch, you can release and move on. It’s a little thing, but it makes the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs feel like manual secateurs, only faster.

I just clipped, moved on, clipped, moved on, and so on. In fact, it’s almost harder to stop pruning; the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs make life that easy. And, they cut cleanly, too.

Advertisement
Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cutting buddleiaStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs cutting buddleia
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

There’s no need to switch tools as with regular secateurs, either, as the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs’ two modes make it well-suited for all typical garden jobs.

Even dealing with thicker growth is easy. Approaching the 25mm limit of the tool, I cut my large rosemary back. Its thicker branches were dealt with just as easily, with no motor grinding or noticeable change in performance.

Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs thick rosemary cutStihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs thick rosemary cut
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

On a full charge, the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs can last for up to 2000 cuts. In other words, a full charge will let you do a full job, regardless of size.

Should you buy it?

You want to make pruning faster and easier

Advertisement

Powerful and fast to use, these secateurs make life easier and let you make more cuts with no fatigue.

Advertisement

You don’t have much to prune

These are more expensive than a manual set of secateurs, so only buy them if you’ll get the most out of them.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

More expensive than a set of secateurs, the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs really do make life easier. Whether you’re deadheading, cutting back or just tidying up growth, this is a brilliant tool.

How We Test

We test every pair of secateurs we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Advertisement
  • We test each hedge pair of secateurs for ease of use and handling
  • We cut a variety of branches to see what jobs each pair of secateurs is good (or bad) at
  • For battery-powered models, we see how far they can cut before running out of power

FAQs

How many cuts can the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs make on a charge?

It can make up to 2000 cuts per full charge.

Which batteries do the Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs take?

These use the AS system of batteries, so you can swap batteries between other compatible tools.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs Review
Manufacturer
Size (Dimensions) x x INCHES
Weight 980 G
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 01/05/2026
Model Number Stihl ASA 20 Cordless Secateurs
Modes 19mm or 25mm
Adjustable length
Power source Battery
Hedge trimmer type Hedge trimmer

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What did Steve Jobs do as Apple CEO?

Published

on

There’s plenty to like, admire, and definitely dislike about Steve Jobs, but he did an incredible job saving Apple, and will forever be treated like a rock star.

The greatest thing that Gil Amelio, Apple’s fifth CEO, ever did was pave the way for Steve Jobs to become its sixth. It was great for Apple, it was great for users, but it was probably horrible for Amelio himself.

That’s because what he did was have Apple acquire Steve Jobs’s failed NeXT firm. As part of that acquisition he got Jobs as no more than an advisor.

He must surely have guessed that Jobs wanted more. When Amelio was just a board member, Jobs had asked him to support an ousting of the then-CEO. Jobs wanted Amelio’s backing to take over the company.

Advertisement

Jobs didn’t get it then, and he didn’t get it when Amelio later bought NeXT. But by then, Jobs was both savvy enough about business, and popular enough with Apple staff, that he didn’t need anyone’s help to take over.

He just needed some time and a bit of leverage.

Apple bought NeXT for about $400 million and it was specifically so it could base the next Mac OS on that firm’s NeXTStep operating system. NeXT had brilliant software and excellent hardware, but it had failed at both and was going nowhere.

So maybe being bought by Apple was a lifeline. Or maybe it was the plan all along.

Advertisement

As presented in Aaron Sorkin’s “Steve Jobs” film, it’s possible that Steve Jobs had being acquired by Apple in mind the whole time. For all its strengths, that film is not noted for its accuracy, but it’s a possibility that fits with Jobs having gone to Amelio.

Yet speaking about his return much later, Jobs made it sound like the whole thing was unexpected and perhaps even unwanted.

“When I was trying to decide whether to come back to Apple or not I struggled. I talked to a lot of people and got a lot of opinions,” Jobs said in 2001. “And then there I was, late one night, struggling with this and I called up a friend of mine at 2am.”

“I said, ‘should I come back, should I not?’ and the friend replied, ‘Steve, look. I don’t give a f*ck about Apple. Just make up your mind’ and hung up,” continued Jobs. “It was in that moment that I realized I truly cared about Apple.”

Advertisement

People change their minds, people misremember details, and people lie. Gil Amelio would probably presume the latter in Steve Jobs’s case, because Jobs allegedly did lie to him.

As part of that deal to buy NeXT, Steve Jobs was personally give shares in Apple, on the promise that he wouldn’t sell them. Shortly afterwards, just about exactly that number of shares were sold and despite Amelio and the industry suspecting it was Jobs, he denied it.

But later, legal and financial reporting laws meant the seller was identified and it was Jobs. The move was seemingly part of his signalling to investors that Apple was not a good buy, and that was something he knew would be heard by the company’s board.

It wasn’t a simple series of steps, and there was much more involved than we may ever know, but Jobs worked steadily to make sure that Amelio was fired.

Advertisement

Once the board fired Amelio, it needed a new CEO and, oh look, here’s one. Here’s a man who knows Apple more than anyone, and has been the CEO of NeXT, which was a huge corporation.

Jobs gets the job

Yet reportedly, Steve Jobs did not lobby to become CEO, and he even asked to not be considered for the role. He asked to be involved in choosing Amelio’s replacement.

It’s hard to be sure of his plan, or even whether he truly had one or was just lurching from opportunity to opportunity. But if you want a job, sometimes the last thing you should do is be visibly keen to get it.

Especially if you are already in a situation where you might as well have the role because you are already taking on all of the responsibility. Certainly from the time that Amelio left, and maybe even earlier, Apple was being run by Steve Jobs.

Advertisement
Retro Apple rainbow logo and NeXT cube logo with colorful text, separated by a computer cursor clicking a Merge button, above bold caption Apple and NeXT announce merger

Apple called it buying NeXT, but NeXT claimed it was a merger – image credit: NeXT

It was also being staffed by him, as he put many ex-NeXT people into key roles. That must have stung existing Apple employees, especially since 3,000 of them were laid off in the February after Jobs returned.

In September 1997, Steve Jobs declared himself the interim CEO, the iCEO. He would stay as that until Macworld Expo in 2000, which is when he formally announced having become Apple’s proper CEO.

Getting to work

He didn’t wait for any title, though, as he immediately got to work trying to bring Apple back from the brink of financial ruin. You can argue that he was petty in cancelling projects like the Newton, but he was also doing it from necessity.

Advertisement

Apple was 90 days or so away from bankruptcy, and the steps Jobs took are the only reason the company survived that time. That includes the then shocking deal he made with Microsoft’s Bill Gates.

That deal is usually presented as being how Microsoft saved Apple. Bill Gates agreed to invest $150 million in Apple, and to develop Microsoft Office for Mac for the following five years.

It is true that Apple needed this. It also needed to be free of the costly litigation that was going on between it and Microsoft over how Windows was copying the Mac.

Jobs must have seen that Apple was not going to win that fight, even if it should have, so he let it go in order to cut that expense. Separately, Microsoft was in trouble with the Department of Justice, though, over being allegedly a monopoly.

Advertisement

By having a Mac version of Office as well as the Windows one, Microsoft could and did make the case that was competing like any other firm.

So it was a win/win for Apple and Microsoft, it was a win/win for Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. But at this time, Mac users and Window users were oil and water, and having the Apple founder appear to bow to the maker of Windows, was not popular.

Jobs could’ve thought ahead about the optics of it all, too. Gates did not come to the event, which was one bad point, and he did a video call instead, which proved to be a worse one.

Bill Gates appeared on an enormous screen, totally dominating the stage and sending every signal possible that Windows was king. He spoke briefly, but the visuals were the thing.

Advertisement

That did make it look as if Apple was over. That it might continue without going bankrupt, but maybe it would never be the same Apple again.

Never the same Apple

It was never the same again. It was better.

Jony Ive was promoted to Senior Vice President of Industrial Design, and by 1998 he had created the iMac. You can point to several devices that saved Apple, including the iPod and the iPhone, but the first one was the iMac.

That was released on May 6, 1998, and it came with a new focus. “Even though this is a full-blooded Macintosh,” said Jobs at its launch, “we are targeting this for the #1 use consumers tell us they want a computer for, which is to get on the Internet, simply and fast.”

Advertisement

But Apple was also focusing on something else. “Apple will be working on strengthening its brand name,” Jobs told a financial site when the iMac launched. He specifically compared Apple to Nike, Disney and Sony, and that focus worked.

We know that now because of how incredibly well known the Apple brand is. But while that took time, Apple made it seem inexorable. By 2017, Interbrand named Apple the year’s most valuable brand, for the fifth year in a row.

That was more significant than perhaps it seems, and it was certainly more important than rival technology firms thought. What the iMac brought was a concentration on what users would use it for, rather than what great technology it could have.

If any one thing describes Apple, both under Steve Jobs and later, it’s this. That design is more than what something looks like, it is how it is used.

Advertisement

“The one thing Apple’s providing now is leadership in colors,” Bill Gates said of the iMac, entirely missing the point. “It won’t take long for us to catch up with that, I don’t think.”

It says a lot that Gates, head of the practically totally dominant Windows firm, was even asked to comment about Apple at this point. It says a lot, too, that he meant it about catching up.

Microsoft, back then, had no reason to compete with Apple except perhaps a bit of pride. Anything they can do, we can do better, appears to have been at the forefront of Microsoft’s collective mind.

So yes, within weeks there were colorful PCs from all sorts of manufacturers. They didn’t change a single thing about Windows, they just used some color plastic on the case instead of beige.

Advertisement

The iPod changes Apple

Originally, Apple never crossed Microsoft’s mind as it worked with vendors around the year 2000. It was working with them to create MP3 music players around its Windows Media Player.

But then in 2001, Steve Jobs launched the iPod and changed everything, eventually. It was typical Apple, which means typical Jobs, in that it was far from the first MP3 music player, but it was profoundly better than anything that came before it.

Initially just for Mac users, the iPod would go on to work with Windows too, and Microsoft was not happy. It could have carried on with other partners, it didn’t have to make its own rival to the iPod, but for one illustration of why it did, there’s a now famous email.

“I have to tell you my experience with our software and this device Creative’s Nomad Jukebox Zen Xtra is really terrible,” wrote Windows Vista development chief Jim Allchin in a 2003 internal email. “Apple is just so far ahead. How can we get the [firms] to create something that is competitive with the iPod? I looked at the Dell system and that is not close either.”

Advertisement

Allchin could have looked closer to home and reexamined Windows Media Player. But over and over again, Microsoft recognized where Apple was superior, and failed to match it despite trying.

For instance, Microsoft probably wasn’t trying to copy Apple when it first attempted to launch an online music store. It was more likely that it wanted some of the action that Napster was getting, but then it saw how the iTunes Music Store was working.

So Microsoft famously introduced the Zune and the less-remembered Zune Marketplace to compete with little Apple. If you need an example of Microsoft thinking of technology and never users, there’s its PlaysForSure program.

There were competing music formats, there were digital rights issues, it was surprisingly complex at the time. Apple hid all of that complexity, Apple made everything seamless for users.

Advertisement

And Microsoft launched its PlaysForSure program. If you got a portable digital player with the PlaysForSure logo on it, you knew you were good to go.

Except Microsoft’s own Zune player didn’t work with it.

Apple had been dying, then under Steve Jobs it was punching far above its weight in terms of industry recognition. Then with the iMac and especially the iPod, and especially against this kind of startlingly poor competition, Apple was becoming the one to beat.

Steve Jobs destroyed the iPod

It took Microsoft years before it abandoned the worthless Zune. In comparison, the iPod was an enormous success, yet under Steve Jobs, Apple killed the iPod.

Advertisement

Apple deliberately destroyed what had been one of the most incredibly lucrative devices made up to that point. And it did it because where other firms would be doubling down on a hit, Apple was looking to what Jobs felt was certain to come next.

On January 9, 2007, Steve Jobs launched the iPhone. You can say that the rest is history, but it’s economic history, it’s business history, and it is social history.

Growing Apple

Before Jobs, John Sculley had done a remarkable job as CEO, increasing Apple’s fortunes, before those fortunes rather went away again. After Jobs, Tim Cook raised its fortunes by a staggering amount to make Apple the biggest company in the world.

Between them, Steve Jobs also increased Apple’s financial fortunes. He raised it by more than Sculley, it raised it by less than Cook, but he raised it at the single most crucial time in Apple’s history.

Advertisement

In 2009, Steve Jobs was named the best-performing CEO in the world by Harvard Business Review, for how he’d increased Apple’s income.

“The #1 CEO on the list, Steve Jobs, delivered a whopping 3,188% industry-adjusted return (34% compounded annually) after he rejoined Apple as CEO in 1997, when the company was in dire shape,” said the magazine. “From that time until the end of September 2009, Apple’s market value increased by $150 billion.”

Shortly after that report, Apple under Steve Jobs launched the iPad. At times it’s been mocked for being just a large iPhone, at other times it’s been criticized as a media consumption device, but there is still no tablet to rival it.

The iPad took longer to become a hit, and it never became the success the iPhone did, but it was a key part of Steve Jobs’s era.

Advertisement

It was also the last major product released during his time.

Steve Jobs steps down

Steve Jobs was the sixth CEO of Apple. Of his predecessors, Mike Markkula stepped aside for John Sculley, but every other one was fired.

Doubtlessly, Steve Jobs would not have stepped down for anyone, and equally certainly, no Apple board would ever have fired him.

But on August 24, 2011, Steve Jobs quit as CEO. He’d already had leaves of absence over health issues, during which Tim Cook became acting CEO.

Advertisement

Now his failing health was too much and Cook became his full-time replacement. Steve Jobs died on October 5, 2011, aged 56. The cause of death was officially respiratory arrest, but the underlying cause was his “metastatic pancreas neuroendocrine tumor.”

“I believe Apple’s brightest and most innovative days are ahead of it,” Jobs had written in his resignation letter. He also told his team, particularly Tim Cook, that they should never look back.

He told them to not ask “what would Steve do.”

You have to imagine that they do ask that, that they do all wonder that, at least at times. But during his time as CEO, Steve Jobs set up Apple for the future, and protected it from ever coming so close to failing again.

Advertisement

It was time for Tim Cook to shape what happened next.

Apple at 50: How each of its CEOs shaped the company

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025