Connect with us

Tech

Anthropic to pay Akamai $11.6 billion over seven years in cloud deal

Published

on

Anthropic will spend $11.6 billion over seven years on Akamai’s cloud infrastructure, Akamai said Thursday. That’s more than six times the size of a $1.8 billion deal between the two companies that Bloomberg reported in May. The commitment isn’t ironclad; according to Akamai’s securities filing, it depends on Akamai meeting certain delivery and service-availability requirements, and either company can end the agreement under certain conditions.

The deal is the largest in Akamai’s history and continues Anthropic’s compute gobbling-streak. It also represents a bet on a less-hyped corner of AI infrastructure: CPUs. Demand for CPUs, the general-purpose chips that handle work like running code and browsing the web, has grown as AI agents take on more tasks, though Akamai didn’t say what Anthropic will use them for. 

Akamai won’t see revenue from the deal this year. On an investor call Thursday, executives said they expect $150 million to $300 million in 2027, starting in the second half, with revenue reaching an annual pace of about $1.7 billion by the end of 2028. 

To build out the capacity, Akamai expects to spend about $5.5 billion. It is also adding about $1.7 billion to this year’s capital spending to buy components such as memory in advance. 

Advertisement

As part of the deal, Akamai issued Anthropic a warrant, essentially the right to buy shares at a set price, for nonvoting preferred stock convertible into 7.7 million common shares, or up to about 5% of the company’s outstanding stock, at $111.33 a share. About 2% is expected to vest, or become available to Anthropic once it makes its first payment under the deal. The rest is tied to Anthropic spending more. Each additional $3 billion it commits to Akamai’s cloud services unlocks roughly another 1%, so the deal could grow by as much as $9 billion, to about $20 billion in total.

It’s the first time Akamai has attached a warrant to a cloud deal, and the contract is the largest in company history, Bloomberg reported.

The warrant flips the more common pattern in circular AI deals, in which suppliers — chipmakers and cloud providers — invest directly in the AI labs that buy their products. Here, the supplier is instead giving its customer a potential stake, one that grows as Anthropic’s spending with Akamai does. AMD used a similar structure with OpenAI last year, tying warrants to chip-purchase milestones. 

Anthropic is no stranger to such arrangements. Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and AMD have all invested or agreed to invest in the company while selling it chips or cloud capacity. CEO Dario Amodei told The New York Times last December that Anthropic does not participate in these deals at the “same scale as some other players.”

Advertisement

Akamai shares rose as much as 17% in after-hours trading on Thursday, The Wall Street Journal reported.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Toyota’s 2028 Corolla could bring gas, hybrid, PHEV and EV powertrains

Published

on

Toyota is preparing a major overhaul of one of its most familiar nameplates, with the next-generation Corolla expected to arrive for the 2028 model year with a new platform, sharper styling and a much wider choice of powertrains. The lineup is expected to include petrol, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fully electric versions, giving buyers several ways to choose their next Corolla.

The Corolla has sold more than 57 million units worldwide since 1966, making it one of the best-selling vehicles ever. Toyota previewed the next-generation design in concept form at the Japan Mobility Show, where CEO Koji Sato outlined the company’s plan to evolve the nameplate across different power sources.

A new Corolla is coming with more than one way to power it

The next Corolla is expected to use a heavily revised version of Toyota’s TNGA-C architecture. The new platform is being designed to accommodate everything from a conventional gas engine to a battery-electric powertrain. That approach means Toyota does not have to turn the entire Corolla family electric at once.

The hybrid version is expected to use a new 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine paired with an electric motor, producing around 134 horsepower combined. According to Toyota engineers cited by Car and Driver, the new hybrid system could be 10 to 20 percent more efficient than the current setup. An all-wheel-drive version with an additional rear electric motor is also possible.

Advertisement

For buyers who still want a conventional engine, Toyota is expected to retain a gas-only Corolla. The company could use a turbocharged version of the new 1.5-liter engine, although a revised 2.0-liter four-cylinder remains another possibility.

The bigger change comes with the arrival of the first Corolla plug-in hybrid and battery-electric models. The PHEV is expected to feature a larger battery and provide more electric driving range, although Toyota has not released detailed specifications. The electric Corolla could be offered with single- or dual-motor configurations and at least 250 miles of range, but its availability in the US remains uncertain.

Sharper design, modern cabin and a new challenge for sedans

The powertrain changes are only part of the transformation. Toyota’s concept preview points toward a much sharper exterior design, while the production car is expected to retain much of that dramatic styling. Inside, the next Corolla is expected to get a more modern cabin with a more open layout, larger displays and simplified controls.

That redesign comes at an important time for the Corolla. In the US, it was Toyota’s fourth-best-selling model in 2025, with 248,088 sales, but compact sedans face growing pressure from small SUVs and established rivals such as the Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra and Nissan Sentra.

The US market could be where the electric Corolla gets most interesting. If Toyota can keep the EV close to the estimated $30,000 price point, it would sit near the bottom end of today’s new-EV market. The 2026 Nissan Leaf starts at $29,990, Chevrolet’s Bolt starts at $27,600 and the Equinox EV starts at $34,995. Hyundai’s Ioniq 5 starts at an estimated $35,000, while Ford’s Mustang Mach-E begins at $37,795.

But price alone may not determine whether the Corolla EV works. US consumers have increasingly gravitated toward SUVs, while the Corolla remains a compact sedan. Toyota’s decision to offer gas, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and electric versions could therefore allow the company to keep the nameplate relevant across different buyer preferences instead of betting everything on EV adoption. The bigger question is whether the electric Corolla actually comes to the US. That remains unconfirmed, and Toyota is expected to reveal more as the 2028 model approaches.

Advertisement

Related coverage:

EV batteries are lasting much longer than the industry expected

The used EV landmine: Why reading the odometer isn’t enough anymore

EV vs. PHEV vs. hybrid: What’s the difference?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

12 Best White Elephant Gifts, Plus a Prank Box to Put Them In (2026)

Published

on

Honorable Mentions

Nowadays Cannabis Infused Beverage, Starting at $40: Bringing a bottle of booze is a white elephant classic; my husband’s work team almost exclusively exchanges bottles of liquor as a safe bet for enthusiasm. I think you can do better, though, and bring a THC spirit instead. This spirit is light and a little fruity, sitting somewhere in between the flavor profile of a floral gin and a sweet sake. My friends and I tried it mixed into a pomegranate cocktail instead of tequila, which was fantastic, and we also loved it with seltzer as a THC twist on a gin and tonic. It’s delicious alone, too. I’d skip this for a work party or any group that might not be green-friendly, though.

Booze in general: This is always a safe pick! You could also bring a bottle of nonalcoholic wine if you wanted an option that everyone can have.

Advertisement

Something edible: As long as you’re in the loop on food allergies, of course. One of the best gifts I received at a Secret Santa was persimmon cookies, made in honor of my love for persimmon fruit. I think baking something delicious would be a fun option for a white elephant, too, especially if you’re someone who has sourdough starter in their kitchen or makes a mean banana bread (my version uses brown butter and Nutella, and it might be my gift of choice this year!)

What Not to Bring to a White Elephant

Here’s what was the least fought over at the white elephant parties I attended last year, or the most inappropriate ideas our team has heard of:

  • A basic, single candle. Nobody needs a candle they could pick up at the store. Unless there’s a fun theme that you’re certain appeals to the group attending, skip bringing a single candle to a white elephant exchange. Or make the candle part of a gift basket; our favorite tomato-scented candle goes great with some kitchen or garden accessories.
  • Puzzles. I think puzzles are hard to randomly gift—true puzzle fanatics will want a lot of pieces, while novices will want an easier one, and you never know which one you’ll get. If you choose a puzzle with too specific a theme, the receiver might not like it as much as a true puzzler or fan of that theme would, but it’s often not beloved enough to be steal-worthy.
  • Live animals. Look, you shouldn’t give baby chicks at Easter, and you shouldn’t give anything even remotely similar—including a mouse, fish, or anything alive.
  • Actual trash. I didn’t think I had to write this one down, but at one gift exchange I went to, someone literally wrapped up a piece of garbage as a joke. As the person who unwrapped the trash gift, I beg of you: Don’t do this.

Rules of a White Elephant

If you’re headed to your first white elephant gift exchange, here’s a quick explainer on what’s about to happen.

Advertisement

Everyone will bring a wrapped gift (often under a certain price, like $25) and place it into a pile or central spot. Then, each person will draw a number that indicates their place in the gift-choosing order. When your number is called, you can either choose and unwrap a gift from the pile, or steal one that has already been unwrapped by someone. Most exchanges will have a limit on how often a gift can be stolen—usually around three times—so if you have the best gift in your hands when it’s time for someone else to choose, there’s no guarantee you’ll get to keep it. If your gift is stolen, you can either unwrap a new one or steal someone else’s gift (no take-backs, sorry).

These rules can vary based on the host and their house rules, so make sure to ask what the rules are at the start of the game. Happy exchanging!


Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

When Trust Is the Product: Scammers and Silicon Valley Are Playing the Same Game

Published

on

Two stories dominating tech circles this week have almost nothing to do with each other on the surface. One is about criminals mailing fake credit cards to unsuspecting Europeans. The other is about a cuddly, Labubu-like mascot Meta built to represent its AI assistant. But look closer, and both are studies in the same discipline: engineering trust so people stop asking questions.

Start with the scammers. In Portugal, France, and Germany, fraud rings have been sending out convincing replacement credit cards through the mail, complete with real customer names printed on the plastic, paired with letters warning that a current card is about to expire. Scan the included QR code to “activate” the new card, and victims land on a fake banking site designed to harvest their real credentials. Georg Hauer, an advisor for digital banks, says the physical card itself is the con’s masterstroke: “The card is almost like a token that creates the trust that is needed in order to fall for the actual trick.” Thanks to cheap AI-assisted design tools, criminals can now mock up a passable replica of a real bank card for a fraction of what it used to cost — and Hauer expects the scheme to keep spreading to new countries precisely because the conversion rate per victim is so high.

Meanwhile, in the US, federal prosecutors in Alabama last week indicted two Romanian nationals for allegedly running old-fashioned skimming operations aimed squarely at SNAP food assistance recipients, whose Electronic Benefit Transfer cards still rely on magnetic stripes rather than chips. The FBI says EBT skimming has been rising steadily since 2021, and US Attorney Phillip W. Williams Jr. called it “a silent insidious theft that occurs by merely swiping a credit card at a point of sale.” Skimming fraud broadly costs Americans more than $1 billion a year, according to prosecutors. Gary Warner of the cybersecurity firm DarkTower notes that even chip-enabled cards remain vulnerable at non-bank ATMs and smaller merchants, where skimmers are sometimes rigged to force a chip read to fail, pushing the transaction back to the far less secure stripe. Mastercard has said it won’t fully retire the magnetic stripe until 2033 — a reminder that “old” technology has a long tail, and so does the fraud built around it.

Now consider Meta’s Muse. The AI agent’s mascot, a fuzzy, wide-eyed character named Jolly, dresses up in outfits, appears in Instagram ads doing bicep curls, and will soon get its own Tamagotchi-style physical gadget for the holidays. Muse is explicitly restricted to adults 18 and over, yet nearly everyone who has looked at Jolly has had the same reaction: it looks like a toy built for toddlers. “Oh my God, it looks like a Teletubby,” says Josh Golin of the children’s advocacy nonprofit Fairplay, who argues the rounded, soft shapes are textbook design language for appealing to preschoolers, adult-only branding notwithstanding.

Advertisement

Meta insists the cuteness is just good product design, not a dodge around its own age restrictions — the company says it checks birthdates and screens for underage users. But researchers who study AI companions see something more calculated at work. Julian De Freitas, a Harvard marketing professor who studies AI companions, points out that Meta is fighting an uphill battle for goodwill after settling social-media-addiction claims for as much as $16.7 billion this year. “These types of cute factors can make the product seem warm and less threatening,” he says. Jathan Sadowski, of Monash University’s Emerging Technologies Research Lab, is blunter: he argues design features like cuteness and frictionless interaction are “sly ways to make people drop their guard, stop asking critical questions, and slip into being passive users” — masking the fact that, by default, Meta trains its models on your conversations with Muse unless you opt out.

It’s a strange symmetry. The scam letter and the plush AI mascot are both, in their own registers, exercises in disarming skepticism. One borrows the visual authority of a bank to get a QR code scanned; the other borrows the visual language of a children’s toy to make an always-on surveillance product feel like a friend in your pocket. Neither depends on breaking any new technological ground — the letter scam runs on a laser printer and a mail slot, and Muse runs, in Meta’s own words, on making an AI agent feel less like “a corporate logo or entity.” The technology is almost beside the point. The real innovation, in both cases, is psychological.

Elsewhere in tech this week, the news was more mundane, if still telling about how central network infrastructure and browser habits have become to daily life. Wired’s testing lineup of mesh Wi-Fi systems for 2026 comes with an unusual asterisk: the FCC’s foreign-made router ban, announced in March, could bar companies without a “Conditional Approval” from selling new mesh systems in the US at all, though existing stock can still be sold and updated through 2029. Netgear, Eero, and Asus have already secured approval, a quiet reminder that geopolitics now shapes what shows up in your living room just as much as engineering does. And for anyone whose real enemy is not scammers or chatbots but their own 40 open browser tabs, a free extension called Tuck has emerged as a small, welcome fix — letting you “snooze” tabs the way Gmail lets you snooze email, no account or data collection required.

Taken together, the week’s tech stories tell a consistent story: whether the goal is stealing your savings or simply your attention, the winning strategy in 2026 rarely involves dazzling new technology. It involves understanding exactly how much trust people are willing to extend to something that looks familiar, official, or adorable — and building products, real or fraudulent, to exploit precisely that.

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Tech

Meta says it will run ads for ‘Musk’ documentary after all

Published

on

At least one social media company appears to be reversing its stance on whether it will accept advertising for director Alex Gibney’s upcoming documentary about Elon Musk.

The Hollywood Reporter published a story Friday saying that TikTok, Meta, YouTube, and X had all refused to run paid ads promoting the trailer for “Musk.” However, when TechCrunch reached out to Meta on Saturday, a spokesperson said, “This was an error and the ads are being restored.”

We’ve asked Meta for more details and will update this article if we hear back.

X’s rejection is unsurprising — Musk, who owns the social media platform, recently posted that “Dogshit is worth more respect than Gibney.” 

Advertisement

But Meta, TikTok, and YouTube reportedly rejected the ad for “political content,” which the platforms have various restrictions on. (Meta said last year that it will stop accepting political ads in the European Union, while TikTok says it doesn’t run them at all.) It’s not clear how a documentary trailer counts as campaign advertising, and the film’s U.S. distributor Bleecker Street told the Hollywood Reporter that it’s appealing the rejections.

Gibney previously directed acclaimed documentaries including “Going Clear” (about the Church of Scientology) and “The Inventor” (about Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos), as well as a movie about Steve Jobs. “Musk,” his latest, premiered at the Venice International Film Festival earlier this month and has received almost universally positive reviews. The film currently has a 100% “fresh” rating on Rotten Tomatoes and is set for theatrical release in the United States on October 9.

Vulture’s Bilge Ebiri described the nearly four-hour movie as a revealing look at Musk’s tech career, his alliance with President Donald Trump, and his personal life, with interview subjects including ex-wife Justine Musk and former right-wing influencer Ashley St. Clair (who recently had a child with Musk but now describes him as “a nuke”).

Ebiri wrote that while the film is a “fascinating” character study, adding, “As a tale of modern business, it’s revealing. And as a warning about our future, it’s terrifying.”

Advertisement

Despite the initial wave of critical acclaim, The Hollywood Reporter also said that Universal Pictures was wavering in its commitment to distribute the film internationally, reportedly due to the studio’s fear of angering the Trump administration. (Universal subsequently said it will release the documentary in theaters but is still figuring out its release strategy).

TechCrunch has also reached out to YouTube, TikTok, X, and Bleecker Street for comment.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple owes Taction $5.7B after losing haptic feedback IP trial

Published

on

An intellectual property lawsuit over the Apple Watch’s Taptic Engine has resulted in a loss for Apple, as a jury ruled that it owes Taction more than $5.7 billion for infringing patents.

Apple and many other device manufacturers rely on haptic feedback to alert users that they have pressed a button successfully, as well as for alerts and message notifications. However, Apple’s implementation of the concept has resulted in a very hefty legal bill.

In April 2021, Taction Technology sued Apple for allegedly infringing on a pair of Taction patents, which were supposedly used in the Taptic Engine. Over five years later, Reuters reports that a jury has sided against Apple on the matter.

The verdict form reveals that Taction has managed to prove to the jury that Apple had infringed on two claims in one patent, and one in the other. However, on the second question, asking if Taction had proved Apple willfully infringed, the jury said it had not.

Advertisement

In effect, the jury says that Taction has proven Apple has infringed, but not that Apple did so knowingly. It wasn’t necessarily an intentional infringement by Apple.

The third page of the form asks if Apple had proved that the three argued claims were invalid. Apple failed on all three parts.

The fourth part of the form, where the jury determines the damages it believes Taction is owed from Apple, advises that Apple owes $5,721,961,750.

Following the result, Taction attorney Lance Yang said that the company was happy the jury found in its favor and vindicated its patent rights.

Advertisement

Apple, meanwhile, insists it doesn’t infringe on Taction’s technology. Furthermore, it maintains that Taction isn’t entitled to any damages, and what was awarded wasn’t based on any evidence in the court’s record.

Apple has also said it disagrees with the verdict and will appeal.

Apple’s statement, shared with AppleInsider, states:

While we thank the jury for their consideration, we strongly disagree with today’s verdict and the damages awarded, which are entirely unsupported by the facts. Apple’s Taptic Engine is fundamentally different from Taction’s technology, which Taction’s own testing of Apple’s products confirmed during trial. Apple does not use Taction’s technology, and we will appeal.

Apple introduced the Taptic Engine with the Apple Watch in 2014, as a new kind of haptic feedback system that used a linear resonant actuator instead of vibratory motors. The change meant that there was a lot of control over the moving mass, allowing for tactile experiences ranging from buzzing and tapping to simulating a heartbeat.

Advertisement

It was so much of a success that the concept was incorporated into other products, including the iPhone.

In 2021, Taction sued Apple, saying Apple initially used coil springs to provide controlled resistance to Taptic’s moving mass, complete with a central locating rod. Newer designs use flexures with ferrofluid to locate the mass and provide controlled resistance.

Apple was accused of buying and reverse-engineering two Kannon headsets that used the technology.

A San Diego federal judge ruled in 2023 that Apple did not infringe the patents. However the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived the case in 2025.

Advertisement

Updated on September 26, 2026 at 1PM ET: Added Apple’s statement.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Australian inquiry asks Altman and Amodei to testify

Published

on

The heads of OpenAI and Anthropic have been asked to face an Australian Senate inquiry into AI and datacentres. The move follows cases in which OpenAI agents got into Australian and US government websites, Luca Ittimani reported for the Guardian on Saturday.

The Greens run the inquiry, and Senator Sarah Hanson-Young chairs it. Its next hearing is in Canberra on 1 October. A second committee, led by Labor, has not asked Sam Altman or Dario Amodei to appear, the Guardian reported.

“This can’t all be done behind closed doors,” Hanson-Young said. “The public has a right to know what went on here.”

Earlier this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said an OpenAI agent had got into the Medicare statistics portal in June. OpenAI took almost three months to report it, and the country’s cyber agency is still looking into what happened.

OpenAI said there was no sign that patient records had been seen, Al Jazeera reported.

Advertisement

The firm has since said its models also reached US government sites, such as those of the Census Bureau and the SEC, the US markets regulator, according to Bloomberg.

On Saturday, Albanese said there had been dozens of cases of AI agents getting data they were not allowed to see.

“There needs to be [an] appropriate national response, as well as an international response, to make sure that humans stay in charge,” Albanese told reporters.

Environment minister Murray Watt also called OpenAI’s conduct completely unacceptable. He said the firm had work to do to earn the trust of Australians.

The request comes as OpenAI and Anthropic push the government to let them train AI on more Australian content, in return for a bigger local presence. Albanese did not say directly this week whether the breach had changed his view of a deal with OpenAI.

Advertisement

The Guardian said it had asked both firms for comment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

AI Finds So Many Linux Bugs, Canonical Changes to a Two-Week Stable Release Update Cycle

Published

on

“Finding vulnerabilities faster also puts pressure on Linux distributions to fix and deliver patches faster,” writes Slashdot reader BrianFagioli

AI has transformed bug discovery from “a manual, time-intensive process into a highly automated engine,” notes Canonical’s blog, leading to a “recent explosion in the volume of CVEs”.

Additionally, the upstream kernel community became its own CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) and assigned CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) identifiers to thousands of bugs, arguing that at the kernel level, almost any type of bug that can affect a running system, could potentially be classified as a vulnerability. As a result, the volume of CVEs has skyrocketed exponentially, creating a massive backlog of alerts and forcing defenders to drastically increase the speed of their fixes to close the window of risk.

To address the growing volume of CVEs and the demand for faster security fixes, we are transitioning to a unified, 2-week release cycle…

Advertisement

While a patch is being prepared, Canonical aims to provide safe workarounds where applicable, so users aren’t left exposed in the meantime. Where no safe workaround exists, Canonical will say so clearly and point users toward general hardening steps instead. The goal is to get environments into a defensible, safer state within 24 to 48 hours of public disclosure — well before a patch ships. This doesn’t replace the patch; it buys the time needed to fix the vulnerability properly, without sacrificing security.

“Linux did not suddenly become wildly insecure overnight,” notes the blog Nerds.xyz. “We are getting much better at finding and cataloging problems that may have previously gone unnoticed.”

There is something almost ironic about all of this. AI is routinely pitched as a tool that will make software development faster, but it is also making vulnerability discovery faster. That means maintainers now have to accelerate the other side of the equation too.
For Ubuntu users, that should ultimately be good news. More bugs being discovered is preferable to vulnerabilities sitting unnoticed in the Linux kernel.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

iPhone 18 Pro vs iPhone 14 Pro: Is it finally time to upgrade?

Published

on

Still sporting the 2022 iPhone 14 Pro and are debating whether it’s time to upgrade? You’ve come to the right place.

We’ve compared the specs of the iPhone 18 Pro to the iPhone 14 Pro and noted the key differences to help you decide whether you think it’s worth splurging on the newer model.

Once you’re finished here, make sure you visit our round-up of the best smartphones and best iPhones.

Specs Comparison Table

iPhone 18 Pro iPhone 14 Pro 
Battery Up to 36 hours video playback Up to 23 hours video playback
Chipset A20 Pro A16 
Rear Cameras 48MP + 48MP + 48MP 48MP + 12MP + 12MP
Screen Size 6.3-inch 6.1-inch
Charging port USB-C Lightning
UK RRP £1199 Around £400 refurbished

Price and Availability

The iPhone 18 Pro is currently available to buy, with a starting price of £1199/$1199 for its 256GB handset. It also comes in a choice between four colours: Black, Silver, Glacier and Burgundy.

Advertisement

Advertisement

As the iPhone 14 Pro launched back in 2022, it’s not surprising that it’s no longer available to buy directly from Apple. However, it is possible to find refurbished handsets on third-party sites, with the price ranging from around £300 to £400 depending on the condition.

iPhone 18 Pro runs on Apple’s most powerful chip – A20 Pro

One of the biggest differences between the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro comes under the hood. While the iPhone 18 Pro runs on Apple’s A20 Pro, a mobile chip that’s hailed as the brand’s fastest ever, the iPhone 14 Pro is powered by the four-year-old A16 Pro.

We’re yet to review the A20 Pro chip ourselves, however Apple claims it enables multi-tasking, gaming and AI tools to all run impressively quickly and smoothly, without any lag. 

Advertisement
iPhone 14 Pro standing upiPhone 14 Pro standing up
iPhone 14 Pro. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

That’s not to say the iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 chip isn’t impressive. During our time with the phone, we found that it was able to comfortably play any Apple Arcade game and could even handle video exports and edits too. In fact, we concluded that there was “almost too much power here”. 

Apple Intelligence is not available on the iPhone 14 Pro

Following on from the above, while the iPhone 18 Pro’s A20 Pro chip enables the running of Apple Intelligence, the iPhone 14 Pro’s A16 doesn’t. 

Advertisement

While we don’t recommend buying an iPhone purely for Apple Intelligence, as it still feels very much like an afterthought and many of its features will likely go unused, it’s undeniable that the lack of the toolkit ages the iPhone 14 Pro. 

iPhone 18 ProiPhone 18 Pro
Image Credit (Apple)

Even so, although Apple doesn’t publicly reveal how many years of software support iPhones receive, we can guess that the iPhone 14 Pro likely has around three more years of updates. This is based on the assumption that Apple gives its iPhones seven years of updates – and that Apple has recently ceased support for the 2019 iPhone X series.

iPhone 18 Pro has Pro camera controls and variable aperture

The iPhone 18 Pro is equipped with three rear cameras, which are headlined by the 48MP fusion main lens with variable aperture. This, according to Apple, is its most “advanced camera ever made” and promises excellent performance across both bright and low lighting conditions, as it’s able to let in more or less light according to your shooting conditions. 

Advertisement
iPhone 18 Pro Glacier cameraiPhone 18 Pro Glacier camera
iPhone 18 Pro. Image Credit (Apple)

Apple’s Pro controls return for the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max, which means you can customise your shooting experience. For example, you can manually adjust the aperture, the shutter speed or customise the photographic styles too.

Advertisement

Although the iPhone 14 Pro also has three rear lenses albeit with different resolutions, including a 48MP main lens, 12MP ultrawide and 12MP telephoto. Overall we found the iPhone 14 Pro able to take excellent shots regardless of the lighting conditions and even stated it to be one of the best camera phones of its time. 

iPhone 14 Pro held in hand showing the backiPhone 14 Pro held in hand showing the back
iPhone 14 Pro. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

However, it does lack the Pro controls that the iPhone 18 Pro is fitted with. In addition, while the iPhone 18 Pro can shoot in up to 4K@120fps, the iPhone 14 Pro maxes out at 4K@60fps. Finally, the iPhone 18 Pro can reach up to 8x zoom whereas the iPhone 14 Pro reaches 3x.

iPhone 18 Pro has a slightly larger display

The age of small phones like the iPhone 13 Mini seems to be well and truly over, as the iPhone 18 Pro measures 6.3-inches compared to the iPhone 14 Pro’s 6.1-inches. Even so, both handsets are equipped with plenty of premium screen technologies including ProMotion, an always-on screen and a Dynamic Island too. 

Dynamic Island on iPhone 18 ProDynamic Island on iPhone 18 Pro
iPhone 18 Pro Dynamic Island. Image Credit (Apple)

iPhone 18 Pro has USB-C charging

Another feature that ages the iPhone 14 Pro is with its charging port. While the iPhone 18 Pro, and all other iPhones since the iPhone 15 series, has a USB-C port, the iPhone 14 Pro still uses Apple’s old Lightning port. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Early Verdict

The iPhone 18 Pro looks like a serious upgrade over the iPhone 14 Pro, thanks to its powerful A20 Pro chip, triple 48MP camera set-up and the inclusion of Apple Intelligence. If you want the most powerful iPhone then the 18 Pro is an easy recommendation. 

However, that doesn’t mean the iPhone 14 Pro is a bad option. In fact, its chip is still pretty powerful, its camera set-up is solid and it’s a decent size too – especially if you prefer smaller handsets. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

PixelMob Portable AI Workstation review

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

PixelMob Portable AI Workstation: 30-second review

Specs

Display: 7-inch OLED touchscreen
Brightness: 1,100 nits
Operating system: Android
Memory: 12GB LPDDR5 RAM
Internal storage: 256GB as standard
Storage expansion: Three M.2 slots, supporting up to 24TB total storage
Card slots: CFexpress Type B, SD and microSD
Connectivity: USB-A, USB-C, HDMI input, HDMI output, LAN and 3.5mm headphone jack
CFexpress transfer speed: Up to 800MB/s
Internal battery: 11,600mAh
External battery: Sony NP-F compatible
Dimensions: 104 x 195 x 25mm
Weight: 550g

Advertisement

If digital creatives, from photographers to videographers, were to design a piece of kit, it would be the PixelMob Pro. It’s essentially a fully featured asset manager that lets you plug in a variety of storage media from cameras or external hard drives, then organise and edit them onto its internal storage, all through its large touchscreen interface.

The system runs on Android, and much of the interface and usability will feel familiar to many. Still, dedicated apps such as Lightbox, Sequence, Cones, and Framebox let you manage and edit all the files, and in addition to these there are a few familiar apps that you can download as well, such as CapCut, Lightroom and a selection from DJI; there’s even a direct connection to Cloud Storage for additional backup.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Meta’s new AI tools turn prompts into games you can then play inside Facebook and Instagram feeds

Published

on

First look: Meta is rolling out two AI-powered tools designed to make game creation for Horizon more accessible: Horizon Create, a mobile app, and Horizon Studio, a browser-based tool with more granular controls. Games made with the tools will also reach users on Facebook and Instagram. Both products will initially be available through early access, with Meta now accepting waitlist sign-ups.

The tools let creators use prompts to build 2D or 3D mobile titles. Meta said the games can include multiplayer, progression systems, art direction and difficulty balancing. Creators can also revise the games after the AI generates an initial version.

“Both enable creators to turn any idea into a complete 2D or 3D mobile game, complete with progression systems, balanced difficulty, art direction, multiplayer, and more, then refine every element to their standards,” Meta said.

Meta has not revealed how much control creators will have over the generated game logic, artwork or other technical components. But the company is still presenting the tools as a way to create full games rather than simple interactive experiments.

Advertisement

That is an important difference in the emerging market for AI game-development tools. Google’s Project Genie, for example, can create short interactive experiences, but Meta says Horizon Create and Horizon Studio are built to produce games with the systems that support longer play sessions.

Meta will also promote games created with the new tools across Facebook and Instagram. Titles built with Horizon Create and Horizon Studio can be recommended to users on both platforms and played directly without leaving the apps.

The company said someone viewing a game clip on Instagram could join a multiplayer game in seconds without downloading another app or being sent elsewhere. “Your game lives natively in the feeds where people already discover content and connect with friends,” Meta said.

The move also reflects Meta’s effort to make Horizon less dependent on virtual reality. Horizon began as a VR app, but Meta has recently shifted its focus to mobile access. Putting Horizon-made games inside Facebook and Instagram could expose them to a much larger audience than the Horizon platform has attracted on its own.

Advertisement

The company is also moving into an area where Roblox has a major advantage. The online game platform has 123 million daily active users and has been adding AI-powered creation features, including a mobile tool that lets users generate games with prompts. Horizon, in contrast, has not reached anything close to that scale.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending