A leaked internal briefing note describes a new admin role on the £330m Federated Data Platform that lets external staff bypass case-by-case data approvals. Patient groups and Labour MPs have called the change dangerous.

NHS England has decided to allow external personnel from contractors, including Palantir, to access identifiable patient data through a new administrative role on its main data platform, the Guardian reported on Sunday, citing an internal briefing note.

The change applies to the National Data Integration Tenant, a controlled environment that NHS England describes as a “haven” for identifiable patient data before that data is pseudonymised and passed into other systems connected to the Federated Data Platform (FDP).

Under existing rules, anyone working on the platform has to apply for approval to access specific datasets, a process known as a Controlled Data Access (CDA) request.

The briefing note seen by the Guardian says NHS England is creating a new “admin” role that grants broader permissions to approved external staff in a single approval, on the basis that applying for individual CDAs had become “too inconvenient”.

Palantir Technologies won the £330m FDP contract in 2023 and is the primary external contractor on the platform. NHS England has said that anyone external requiring access under the new arrangement must hold government security clearance and be approved by an NHS England director or more senior official. The list of contractors with potential access also includes consultancy firms supporting the programme.

The Federated Data Platform is designed to pull operational data from trusts across the NHS into a single environment for planning, waiting-list management and resource allocation.

Identifiable patient information is meant to remain inside the National Data Integration Tenant, with only pseudonymised or aggregate data passed to downstream FDP modules. The new admin role applies to staff working inside the tenant itself.

Patient groups and several Labour MPs criticised the change. Labour MP Rachael Maskell told the Guardian the move was “dangerous” and urged ministers to intervene to halt the broader FDP project. medConfidential, a patient-data-rights group, said the new role represented a material shift in how identifiable data is governed inside NHS England’s largest data programme.

NHS England said the change had been internally approved by its information-governance team and that all access remained subject to existing legal and clinical-safety frameworks.

Palantir declined to comment on the specifics of the access arrangement. The company has previously said it processes NHS data only on instructions from NHS England and does not own or commercialise the underlying data.

The change reignites a long-running political dispute over the FDP contract. Critics have argued from the start of the procurement process that giving a single US-headquartered defence and intelligence contractor central access to the NHS data spine creates concentration risk and undermines public trust.

NHS England and the Department of Health have defended the contract on the basis that it improves operational efficiency and reduces clinical-safety risk by consolidating fragmented data systems.

Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has not made a public statement on the latest disclosure. The government’s broader position has been that the FDP is essential to NHS modernisation and that data-access processes are subject to robust controls.

The briefing note suggests the trade-off the new admin role embodies: faster operational onboarding of external staff against tighter case-by-case oversight of which datasets they access.

The Information Commissioner’s Office has not formally commented on whether the new role triggers any additional regulatory review. The Guardian’s reporting did not indicate when the role was scheduled to take effect; NHS England did not provide a date when asked.

Conspiracy theorists, wellness influencers, and grifters have already started promoting wild claims about the hantavirus outbreak that began aboard the MV Hondius, a cruise ship on the Atlantic.

Some conspiracy theorists compared the outbreak to the Covid-19 pandemic, claiming it was another effort to control the global population, while others pushed a false narrative that the Covid-19 vaccine caused hantavirus. Many others promoted ivermectin as a treatment, using the incident as a way to sell emergency medical kits featuring the antiparasitic drug typically used as a horse dewormer.

In more recent days, many of these same people spreading conspiracy theories have promoted the baseless and antisemitic claims that the entire incident is a false flag orchestrated by Israel.

Conspiracy theories flooding social media in response to breaking news are nothing new, but what is notable about those being pushed around the hantavirus outbreak is just how closely they echo the conspiracy theories promoted during the Covid-19 pandemic.

“One of the most striking shifts since the Covid pandemic is how rapidly misinformation narratives now organize themselves around emerging outbreaks,” Katrine Wallace, an epidemiologist at University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, tells WIRED.

“Within hours of the first hantavirus headlines, social media accounts were already promoting ivermectin, attributing the outbreak to Covid vaccines, and warning about a hantavirus vaccine that does not exist. The claims themselves were often contradictory, but that contradiction no longer appears to limit their spread.”

Once the hantavirus outbreak started making headlines around the world, conspiracy theorists and grifters jumped into action, spreading dangerously ill-informed claims and, of course, trying to sell people ivermectin.

“Ivermectin should work against it,” Mary Talley Bowden wrote on X. Bowden, a doctor, is a prominent promoter of medical misinformation who has promoted ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19 and prescribed ivermectin to a Covid-19 patient. Hours after her first post on Hantavirus went viral, she followed up to say that she is selling ivermectin to Texans. Bowden did not respond to a request for comment.

Her post, which has been viewed 4 million times, was shared by former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who added that vitamin D and zinc would help fight the infection. Greene even claimed that not getting the Covid-19 vaccine had somehow allowed her to “develop natural immunity” against hantavirus.

Greene separately claimed, without evidence, that the pharmaceutical company Moderna had purposely manipulated the virus in order to allow them to cash in by developing a hantavirus vaccine. Greene did not respond to a request for comment.

Other prolific health disinformation promoters boosted the ivermectin claims, including Simone Gold, the founder of Covid denial group America’s Frontline Doctors, and Peter McCullough, a disinformation peddler who promoted the “sudden death” conspiracy theory about the Covid-19 vaccine, which falsely claimed that those who received the shot were at risk of dropping dead without any warning.

McCullough is also the chief scientific officer for The Wellness Company, which has been described as “Goop for the GOP.” The company has used the hantavirus outbreak to promote a $325 “Contagion Emergency Kit” which includes both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

All the false claims and posts about ivermectin gained enough traction online that the World Health Organization responded to say that there is no research to suggest ivermectin is an effective treatment for hantavirus.

Conspiracy theorists have, meanwhile, been pushing the baseless idea that a side effect of Covid vaccines includes a hantavirus infection.

Sony is still keeping things wide open when it comes to its next-generation console.

According to the company’s latest earnings call, the PlayStation 6 still has no confirmed release date or price. Sony says it is closely monitoring rising memory costs and wider market conditions before locking anything in.

The update came during Sony’s annual corporate strategy and investor Q&A session. At this session, CEO Hiroki Totoki addressed concerns about how global supply pressures could shape the company’s next console. His message was simple: nothing is decided yet.

As shared by Eurogamer, Totoki explained that the ongoing memory shortage is driving up manufacturing costs. This is increasing the overall bill of materials (BoM) for hardware like the PS6. While Sony has already secured enough components for 2026 and has some pricing agreements in place, the outlook beyond that is far less stable.

Looking further ahead, he warns that memory prices will likely remain high into FY2027. This means Sony is still evaluating how that will impact production costs and retail pricing. That uncertainty is now directly feeding into PS6 planning.

“We have not yet decided at what timing we will launch the new console, or at what prices,” Totoki said, adding that Sony is running multiple scenarios to figure out its next move. That includes, notably, the possibility of adjusting its business model. However, the company didn’t expand on what that could actually mean for players.

For now, it’s all positioning rather than specifics. Sony isn’t confirming features, pricing tiers, or even a launch window. The company is just acknowledging that external pressures, particularly AI-driven demand for memory, are reshaping its hardware strategy.

The comments echo wider industry concerns, with companies across the tech space warning about supply bottlenecks affecting future products. Within PlayStation itself, former executives and hardware leads have also hinted that the next generation may need a different approach compared to the PS5 era.

As it stands, the PS6 remains firmly in the planning phase. And while speculation around features and timelines continues to build, Sony’s message is clear: the final shape of its next console will depend as much on the global market as it does on its own roadmap.

Waymo has issued a software update to its fleet of nearly 4,000 vehicles to help them avoid flooded roads as part of a recall announced by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on Tuesday.

But the company hasn’t fully solved the problem of how its vehicles behave in these conditions. In documents released by NHTSA, the federal safety regulator says Waymo is still “developing the final remedy for this recall.”

The issue appears to be that Waymo’s robotaxis were slowing, but not stopping, when encountering flooded roads that they could not traverse, according to NHTSA. Robotaxis using both Waymo’s fifth- and sixth-generation autonomous vehicle systems are affected.

The regulator said the recall applies to 3,791 vehicles — giving us a more up-to-date understanding of just how many vehicles Waymo has on the roads in around a dozen U.S. cities.

Waymo has now issued multiple recalls for its self-driving cars. The company’s first recall came in February 2024 after it discovered two robotaxis in Phoenix had separately crashed into the same towed vehicle. Since then, Waymo has issued recalls to fix low-speed crashes with parking gates and telephone poles, as well as to address illegal driving in the vicinity of school buses.

Waymo decided to issue the recall in late April after its robotaxis struggled to navigate flooding in central Texas; in one incident, an empty robotaxi was swept away in San Antonio. The company has also paused operations in the city.

The initial update sent to its fleet places “restrictions at times and in locations where there is an elevated risk of encountering a flooded, higher-speed roadway,” according to NHTSA.

“We have identified an area of improvement regarding untraversable flooded lanes specific to higher-speed roadways, and have made the decision to file a voluntary software recall with NHTSA related to this scenario,” Waymo said in a statement. “We are working to implement additional software safeguards and have put mitigations in place, including refining our extreme weather operations during periods of intense rain, limiting access to areas where flash flooding might occur.”

from the censorial-fascist-weirdos dept

ABC/Disney, like most major media companies, has spent much of its time during America’s bout with authoritarianism being a feckless wimp. The company was quick to ditch its already fleeting embrace of civil rights to please our dim, racist president, and were just as quick to pay Trump a $15 million bribe to settle a baseless Trump lawsuit they could have easily won.

But as Trump’s health and power becomes more shaky, ABC appears to be showing the faint outline of a backbone.

ABC/Disney execs are now more directly accusing the Trump administration of violating the First Amendment with its endless threats to pull the company’s broadcast licenses if it platforms journalists, comedians, or talk show hosts who refuse to kiss the administration’s ass.

Quick background: we’ve noted repeatedly how Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr has been abusing the FCC’s dated “equal opportunity” (or “equal time”) rule to try and threaten daytime and late night talk shows with government retribution if they refuse to enthusiastically coddle Republicans.

Recently, the Carr FCC took the unprecedented step of demanding that ABC-owned Houston affiliate KTRK file a petition for declaratory ruling to the FCC, explaining to the agency why it didn’t file the appropriate paperwork for a February 2nd appearance by Democrat James Talarico on The View (the traction Talarico is making among Christians clearly seems to worry the administration).

So KTRK last week filed their petition for declaratory ruling. And it shows slightly more backbone that we’ve become used to, directly stating that the Trump FCC’s actions violate the First Amendment and are having a “chilling effect” on free speech. While the petition is technically on behalf of KTRK, it was signed by Paul Clement, a former Bush-era solicitor general and very experienced Supreme Court litigator.

Talk shows have historically been exempt from the dated, golden-era-of-television rules, which required that any airing of a political candidate on “publicly owned” airwaves is countered with the appearance from a candidate from the opposing party. But Carr isn’t interested in equilibrium; he’s interested abusing FCC authority to try and silence critics of Donald Trump and his increasingly unpopular policies.

ABC’s notice to the FCC notes that the target of the administration’s censorial rage, The View, was clearly granted a Bona Fide Exemption to the rule back in 2002. Most talk shows have broadly been viewed as exempt since 1984 or so (and increasingly so, as the Internet challenged TV’s supremacy). From the ABC filing:

“The View has been broadcasting under a bona fide news exemption granted to it more
than twenty years ago, consistent with longstanding Commission interpretations designed to
minimize the serious First Amendment problems inherent in the equal time regime.
The View’s exemption remains valid and the constitutional infirmities in the equal time doctrine are even more pronounced today, when the broadcast airwaves account for a slice of the numerous media options through which Americans get their political information.”

Carr’s FCC has also been threatening to pull ABC’s broadcast licenses in the wake of Jimmy Kimmel making fun of the president’s wife; but as we’ve previously reported, ABC only holds eight broadcast licenses in total; most in reality are owned by right wing affiliate companies already loyal to Trumpism.

Here’s an interesting bit of note: It appears that the Carr FCC staged things in advance with the help of those affiliates to make ABC-owned KTRK seem like it was doing something wrong.

First, the FCC tried to tell ABC and KTRK that The View being widely viewed as exempt is “not a position uniformly held by broadcasters that air the program” (it is).

But on pages 3-4 of ABC’s filing, they note that not only did those other affiliates not originally file the paperwork for the appearance (because there’s no need to given their exemption), the FCC personally reached out to a number of non-ABC owned affiliates to have them file paperwork late so it would appear that the ABC-owned KTRK was an outlier that did something wrong. From ABC’s filing:

“The Bureau neglected to note, however, that while certain ABC affiliates documented Talarico’s appearance in their online public inspection files, the filings were made more than two weeks after Talarico’s appearance and apparently at the request of the FCC, which reportedly promised to eschew enforcement for the late filing. KTRK Television received no such request and no such offer, despite the Bureau specifically contacting it about the Talarico appearance less than 10 days after it occurred.”

That’s really profoundly greasy behavior. These other affiliates, that the FCC pressured to file late notices of Talarico’s appearances, would be companies like Sinclair, Tegna, Nexstar, Gray Media, or Scripps, most of which are owned by Trump-loyalists and/or are seeking FCC approval for approval for mergers that illegally ignore the country’s last remaining media consolidation limits.

So again, the FCC accused ABC and its directly owned affiliate of something false, then told non-ABC owned affiliates to file paperwork they never would have otherwise planned to if they wanted merger approval to make it seem like KTRK did something wrong. And since a lot of these affiliates are already very Trump-friendly propaganda mills, the FCC likely didn’t have to apply much pressure.

While it’s always possible the Trump-stocked Supreme Court makes an insane ruling in Trump’s favor, these threats to pull broadcast licenses are not fights the Trump FCC wants to actually litigate. They’re designed to simply be a form of harassment that makes life so costly and difficult for companies that threat targets — and everybody else — just pre-emptively bows to pressure to censor.

Trump and Carr expect companies to pre-emptively quiver and not put up a costly fight. And while these threats have worked for a while (because our corporate media is broadly opportunistic and pathetic), Trump’s abysmal poll numbers in the wake of the Iran war and soaring gas prices are likely instilling new confidence even among the most weak-kneed companies.

Filed Under: affiliates, brendan carr, censorship, equal time rule, fcc, first amendment, free speech, james talarico

Companies: abc, disney

If you have a Google smart display or speaker at home, there are new updates you should know about. Google has rolled out a fresh batch of improvements to Gemini for Home, making the assistant noticeably smarter and faster across smart speakers and displays.

Gemini for Home is getting smarter and more personal

The most interesting addition is how Gemini now uses information you’ve saved in Ask Home to answer camera-related questions. If you’ve saved a note saying your nanny’s name is Alice, you can ask Gemini when Alice arrived, and it will pull up the relevant camera footage automatically.

You can also ask for a Home Brief on your speaker or display to get a quick summary of everything that happened at home while you were away. On smart displays, Gemini will now show thumbs-up and thumbs-down buttons after most voice interactions, making it easier to give Google quick feedback.

Response times have also improved across the board. Backend processing for common commands has been optimized, so things like turning on lights, setting alarms, and managing timers should feel noticeably quicker than before.

Adult users will also now get more helpful responses to general queries, including things like cocktail recipes, while parental controls remain in place to protect younger users.

The Google Home app is getting useful upgrades too

These updates arrive alongside version 4.16 of the Google Home app, which brings its own set of improvements. Device setup is now simpler thanks to a new QR code discovery flow that automatically directs you to the right setup path for your device.

Nest Thermostat users can now pause outdoor temperature settings with a single tap, without affecting their long-term schedule. Thermostat schedule banners also now display more relevant and timely information.

Lastly, iPhone users can now manage compatible third-party thermostats and air conditioners directly in the app, catching up with what Android users could already do.

Most TV speakers treat dialogue as an afterthought, burying it beneath a wall of compressed sound that makes you reach for the subtitles before the first scene is done.

The Fire TV Soundbar Plus is the answer to that frustration, and with the 3.1-channel system now down from $249.99 to $174.99, a built-in subwoofer and spatial audio are available at a price that makes upgrading feel like an obvious rather than an extravagant decision.