TL;DR
OpenAI filed confidentially for an IPO with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, potentially listing this autumn. Anthropic filed last week at $965bn. SpaceX lists Thursday at $1.8tn. The AI public market is about to absorb three mega-listings.
More white-collar workers are turning to unions and trade associations for help after losing their jobs.
The National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has also seen more cases of retrenchments due to business restructuring recently, said its assistant secretary-general Patrick Tay.
NTUC handled over 3,900 retrenchment and termination-related cases for professionals, managers and executives (PMEs), up 5% from 2024.
Some cases stemmed from offshoring and relocation as companies cut costs, Tay told The Straits Times in an interview. In some instances, roles are being shifted out of Singapore “even when local PMEs are experienced and capable,” he said.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is also emerging as a factor, though economy-wide data remains limited. “We are also seeing businesses cite investments in AI as a factor for workforce restructuring,” said Tay. “Some workers find themselves displaced because job roles are changing faster than they can adapt.”
The figures cover cases handled across NTUC’s 58 affiliated trade unions and six trade associations, including the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management@NTUC. They exclude cases from its Employment and Employability Institute (e2i).
While total employment in Singapore has grown and the unemployment rate has remained low at 2% in 2024 and 2025, retrenchments have increased over the past few years from 6,440 in 2022 to 13,020 in 2024 and 14,400 in 2025.
Tay said that NTUC is concerned that many PMEs are still not aware that they can join unions and be represented by labour movements during retrenchments.
It is particularly worried about those in the professional services, finance and infocomm and technology sectors as they are most exposed to the effects of generative AI at work, said the Pioneer MP, who is also director of strategy and legal at NTUC.
NTUC is working to do more for PMEs, said Tay, noting that unions’ scope to represent them has widened over time. Previously, PMEs could only be represented individually on limited matters. But 2015 amendments to the Industrial Relations Act expanded this, allowing rank-and-file unions to represent them collectively as a class.
Now, only employees with clear conflicts of interest—such as those involved in hiring and firing, or with access to confidential personnel and budget information—are excluded from union representation during retrenchment.
As industries transform and PMEs face growing retrenchment exposure, NTUC is pushing for stronger protections, Tay said. This includes advocating in Parliament for earlier retrenchment notices and broader access to the SkillsFuture Jobseekers’ Support Scheme for the involuntarily unemployed.
NTUC is also working with the Government and employers on the Employment Act review, hoping provisions can extend further to PMEs, he added.
“We’re trying to get more of the PMEs to be aware that they can be part of a union and that actually we can represent them,” he added.
Labour economist Walter Theseira warned that mandating additional worker protections could make Singapore’s labour market more rigid and hurt competitiveness. But he also acknowledged that workers are currently “too exposed to the risks of retrenchment.”
The Singapore University of Social Sciences associate professor also noted that benefits are not legally mandated, but subject to the solvency of a company and its willingness to pay.
“The presumption that PMEs can ‘self-insure’ places a burden on families to set aside substantial savings in case of retrenchment,” he said.
Unemployment benefits in the form of the Jobseekers’ Support Scheme are also currently too limited to lower-income workers, Theseira added.
As such, Theseira suggested that including higher-income workers with larger payout levels through a scheme jointly funded by workers and employers could be useful.
Another solution the professor posited was retrenchment benefit insurance that companies are required to contribute to, which could also be useful in providing guaranteed benefits.
A risk-pooled retrenchment benefits system could be more efficient than leaving workers to fend for themselves, he added, with safeguards to encourage reskilling and job search while receiving support.
Featured Image Credit: TK Kurikawa/ Shutterstock.com
offbeat
Prochain arrê: Gare du Bork! French capital city train does the tech can-can
BORK!BORK!BORK! Good news from the Paris Metro. To show off the nation’s technological prowess, Parisian techies have eschewed such fripperies as advertisements and transit information in favor of a good, old-fashioned directory browser.
Spotted by eagle-eyed Register reader “DJ Finsletown,” the screen adorned a carriage of Line 11 at the Chatêlet terminus earlier in June. It looks to us as though a web server threw a bit of a wobbly and showed users its undercarriage.
Then again, France did give us the can-can dance, in which participants perform high kicks that reveal their underwear, so perhaps this is simply the tech version of the music hall standard.

Our reader pondered whether the system behind the scenes was struggling with a recent heatwave, or the borkage was the result of some over-exuberance by football fans following PSG’s recent Champion’s League final victory.
What is perhaps more likely is that some techie in a backroom somewhere opted for a Gallic shrug rather than reaching for the inevitable CTRL-ALT-DEL to revive the stricken system.
Line 11 is notable for being one of the least-used lines of the Paris metro system until a recent extension. It also featured some of the oldest-running stock and was notable for rubber-tired trains and heat that might make London’s Central Line commuters mutter “steady on.”
It was also one of the last lines to be constructed in central Paris, on the former route of the Belleville funicular. The funicular, which ran along the streets in a manner familiar to San Francisco residents, ceased operation just over 100 years ago, in 1924. Line 11 got the nod in 1935.
As for the web server disgorging its contents, that is a far more modern innovation. Heck, it might even be some AI advert demonstrating what might, or might not, happen if an agent is let loose on a system. In the case of the latter, a borked display would, we suspect, be the least of the problems faced by passengers.
Or, as our reader joked, “Probably likely the train’s IT systems just went on strike, like all good French fonctionnaires!” ®
Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Today’s NYT Strands puzzle was an especially tough one, I thought. Some of the answers are difficult to unscramble, so if you need hints and answers, read on.
I go into depth about the rules for Strands in this story.
If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections and Mini Crossword answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.
Read more: NYT Connections Turns 1: These Are the 5 Toughest Puzzles So Far
Today’s Strands theme is: Dramamine, anyone?
If that doesn’t help you, here’s a clue: Maybe a yacht.
Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle’s theme. If you’re stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work:
These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers:
The completed NYT Strands puzzle for June 9, 2026.
Today’s Strands spangram is IMONABOAT. To find it, start with the I that’s five letters down on the far-left row, and wind across.
#1: To get more clue words, see if you can tweak the words you’ve already found, by adding an “S” or other variants. And if you find a word like WILL, see if other letters are close enough to help you make SILL, or BILL.
#2: Once you get one theme word, look at the puzzle to see if you can spot other related words.
#3: If you’ve been given the letters for a theme word, but can’t figure it out, guess three more clue words, and the puzzle will light up each letter in order, revealing the word.
Buying new tools can be expensive, and if you only need them for one or two jobs, it might not seem worth the money. Investing in an attachment for an existing tool rather than forking out for a new one might seem like a good alternative, but there are many pitfalls to be aware of. There are certainly plenty of weird third-party drill attachments available on sites like Amazon, but if you buy an attachment from a no-name brand, there’s a significant risk that it won’t perform as well as advertised. It might even be a safety hazard, as YouTuber Project Farm found out firsthand when he bought a selection of drill attachments to see if they could replace his power tools.
Some of the attachments he tested proved to be up to the task for occasional use, but others broke during testing, and a few were downright dangerous. The first attachment he tested, a vegetation cutter, was particularly sketchy. The cheap Chinese-made attachment had sharp but flimsy blades and partially came apart during testing, with a fastener breaking off while the attachment was spinning. If another fastener or two had detached, it could have very easily sent the blade flying. Project Farm deemed the attachment “the most dangerous […] I’ve ever tested,” but it wasn’t the only attachment in the video that proved to be a safety risk.
The second attachment that Project Farm tested was a circular saw attachment that had to be manually assembled and was missing some key safety features. For starters, there was no blade guard, and there was also no way to center the blade on the shaft. The blade also proved to be poor quality, and as a result, Project Farm couldn’t get a clean cut. Comparing the attachment to a circular saw from a major brand, the difference was night and day. Not only was the circular saw far faster, but it also produced a much neater cut.
It’s well worth watching the whole video to see the range of attachments tested and their varying performances. A few attachments worked surprisingly well for occasional use, and a couple of DeWalt attachments that Project Farm tested were decently capable. However, given the hit-and-miss quality of most of the attachments he tested, we can safely conclude that attempting to replace all of your power tools with drill attachments isn’t a good idea.
One or two of them might be genuinely useful, but plenty of others will likely be poorly built and, in a worst-case scenario, could leave you needing a trip to the nearest emergency room. Some drill attachments get good ratings on platforms like Amazon, but it’s best not to rely on them to do a job that would otherwise require a dedicated tool.
OpenAI filed confidentially for an IPO with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, potentially listing this autumn. Anthropic filed last week at $965bn. SpaceX lists Thursday at $1.8tn. The AI public market is about to absorb three mega-listings.
TL;DR
OpenAI submitted confidential IPO paperwork to the SEC on Monday, the company confirmed. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are advising on a potential listing that could come as soon as the autumn, according to people familiar with the matter.
The filing makes OpenAI the third major AI-adjacent company to move towards public markets in a single week. Anthropic filed confidentially last week at a $965 billion private valuation. SpaceX, which now includes xAI, is expected to begin trading on Thursday at roughly $1.8 trillion.
“We have not decided on timing yet; it may be a while because there are things we want to do that are likely easier as a private company,” OpenAI said in a statement. “But it’s a complicated set of tradeoffs and this gives us the option to go public sooner if that ends up being best.”
The company is also planning a tender sale of shares in the coming weeks to provide liquidity to employees before any public listing. OpenAI completed a $122 billion funding round in March at an $852 billion valuation, the largest private raise in history.
Anthropic’s valuation leapt past OpenAI’s for the first time in its latest private round, hitting $965 billion as its revenue surged. That reversal, combined with SpaceX’s imminent $1.8 trillion listing, creates pressure for OpenAI to establish a public-market benchmark before its competitors define the terms.
OpenAI has told investors it plans to spend roughly $600 billion on AI infrastructure by 2030. That kind of capital requirement is difficult to fund indefinitely through private rounds, even at OpenAI’s scale.
The S-1, when it becomes public, will need to address several known issues. OpenAI reportedly missed certain internal revenue and user growth targets. Several key executives have departed or stepped back from their roles.
The company’s restructuring from a non-profit to a for-profit entity is ongoing, and the failed Musk lawsuit to block the conversion, while legally resolved, surfaced internal documents that will be scrutinised by public-market investors.
The convergence of OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX in public markets within months of each other will test whether investor appetite for AI is deep enough to absorb three mega-listings simultaneously. SpaceX alone is seeking $75 billion.
If all three succeed, AI companies will have raised more capital from public markets in a single year than in the entire history of the sector. If demand falters, the one that files last will pay the highest price for waiting.
Whether you’re a novice getting your PPL, an experienced pilot with thousands of hours of flight time, or an avid simmer, you’re probably familiar with the basics of aircraft weight and balance. Arguably, it’s one of the most important and fundamental concepts of flight; you cannot fly an aircraft that is overweight, nor can you fly one with all its weight in the nose or tail. Okay, that much is common sense, but let’s be more specific. Why, exactly, does this matter so much? Why do rules like MTOW and center of gravity need to be accurately calculated?
The short answer is that manufacturers determine what is and isn’t acceptable for their specific aircraft from the factory, and list these parameters as reference points. If any of these aren’t adhered to, then you won’t be able to sustain flight, if indeed you can take off at all. That’s because an overweight aircraft cannot produce enough lift to overcome the force pushing all that weight toward the ground, and an unbalanced aircraft will either want to go nose up or nose down to the point where it’s uncontrollable.
Full lectures are available online for free that describe this phenomenon in detail, such as this one from the Free Pilot Training YouTube Channel. You could also peruse the official FAA handbook on the topic. But what about a more general overview and basic guidelines to get you started? That’s what we’ll address in this article. Let’s take a look and explain the physics behind these concepts.
If you’re a frequent flyer, you’ve undoubtedly noticed that many international and budget flights have baggage weight restrictions, generally around 30 to 40 pounds. Why this limit is so important relates to an aircraft’s overall weight and where that weight is placed — more on the second point later.
Firstly, what exactly is weight? In aeronautics, weight is defined as the force generated by gravity pulling the aircraft back to Earth. Every component of the aircraft bears a specific weight, which is all calculated on the Newtonian equation of W=mg, or Weight = Mass multiplied by Gravity. The mass is determined by a component’s material composition; an object’s mass is its total density multiplied by its volume. Therefore, a denser part in the same space is heavier than an identical part made from a less dense material.
All of these factors go into an aircraft’s structural Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW), the absolute weight limit the aircraft can safely take off with. This is a hard limit that doesn’t change with external factors like altitude and air pressure; the equations account only for the gravitational force and density. Therefore, a Boeing 737 has this same weight limit regardless of whether it’s in Denver or Amsterdam, though its actual safe takeoff weight will be lower in Denver’s thin air.
Manufacturers want to shed as much weight as possible without compromising structural rigidity to allow for more fuel, passengers, cargo, and on-board systems to be carried. They can also increase the weight the aircraft can carry during takeoff by adding more power, more durable structural members, or even small rocket engines that provide extra speed, known as JATO (jet-assisted takeoff).
If the weight is the total force pushing down on the aircraft, then its center of gravity is the point where that weight is evenly distributed. In other words, if you were on a seesaw and a different weight was opposite you, it’s where you (or the weight) would need to be for that seesaw to be perfectly balanced.
Take a basic front-engine airplane, for example. You have a big lump of engine in the front and nothing in the back — common sense means the aircraft is nose-heavy. To balance that out, you have the aircraft’s tail, which provides a certain amount of downward force to counteract the force exerted by the weight differential. This can then be extrapolated to all aircraft as well; a typical passenger airliner, for instance, will account for the weight of all passengers, cargo, and fuel on board, which is why some flights have weight limits.
Now you know how to find the balance; next is the Center of Lift (COL). You want the COL slightly behind the center of gravity (CG), so the aircraft naturally tends to go nose-down. This tendency has a term: the Angle of Attack, or AOA, which is defined as the angle at which the wing’s chord line (an imaginary line from the leading to the trailing edge) intersects the wind. A higher AOA means the aircraft is pitched up. Too much AOA and the aircraft stalls; too little and it’s plummeting. You want to balance the aircraft so that the COL naturally tends to keep the aircraft at the ideal AOA, allowing it to fly without stressing its control surfaces. An awkward CG is why some rear-engine aircraft, like the Boeing 727, proved especially tricky to fly.
We’ve been testing (aka eating) Blue Apron for our guide to the best meal kit subscriptions for nearly half a decade.The Gear team likes this service so much, it has its own story. If you’ve been struggling with figuring out what to make for dinner, you can save some money on our top service right now using a Blue Apron coupon or deal featured right here on WIRED.
Blue Apron makes it easy—new customers can enjoy $100 off for the first five weeks of a new subscription—plus the first week ships free). Blue Apron is offering discounts of up to $4 per serving, depending on whether you opt for 4, 6, 8, or 10 meals per week. WIRED readers get rewarded—in discounts on delicious food—with $25 off your first 2 orders with promo code CONDE25, until August 11 2026. There’s also other sitewide deals for 20% off your first 2 orders with code WELCOME20 and25% off with code WELCOME25 at checkout Check out Blue Apron and see if it’s the right meal kit service for you, and from there you’ll be able to claim the deal with either promo code, and both codes are valid site wide.
Apron now offers an Autoship & Save program, which includes a 5% discount on every autoship order. Be sure to download the Blue Apron app, which allows you to easily manage subscriptions, get notifications, and live delivery updates through your phone. With Autoship & Save, you’ll set up recurring deliveries on a schedule that works for you, and you can save 5% on every order. This includes setting your own schedule, including how often you want deliveries and what day of the week you want them. Plus, you can always skip a delivery if you don’t need it that week. To get started, you just need to choose your menu items from a wide range of options, and every order is pre-filled with meals Blue Apron recommends, but you can always add, swap, or remove anything before it ships out.
If you’re a commitment-phobe like me and don’t want to sign up for pricey recurring orders in the subscription model before trying, we have good news. Unlike almost all other meal kits and delivery services, Blue Apron just updated their model to include a la carte meal kits and ready-to-eat meals that don’t require a recurring plan. You can get delivery in as little as three days, and it requires no commitment or mandatory subscription.
Meal Kits include step-by-step recipes and pre-portioned food, from $7 to $13 per serving. Easy ‘Assemble & Bake’ meals require minimal prep and are $11 to $13 per serving, and ‘Dish by Blue Apron’ are ready to eat, heat-and-serve meals from $9 to $12 per serving. They’ve also expanded their menu with new recipes, now with over 100 meals to choose from.
Blue Apron now also has a membership program, where for $10 per month, you’ll get free shipping on all orders, unlimited Tastemade+ streaming (this includes food, home and travel shows, a $50 value), and exclusive deals promotions throughout the year. If the bonus promos seem like something you’d use, the membership program is a good deal, because delivery is already $10 per month, so you’re getting free shipping plus all of these extra goodies. If you’re unsure, you can try it out with a 30 day free trial, just follow the link here. The good news is that you can get 20% off an annual Blue Apron+ membership, now at $80 per year instead of $100.
Blue Apron wants to reward our everyday heroes, and has discounts for Military members, Students, Graduates, Teachers, Seniors, Medical Staff, and First responders. Members of these groups can get $150 off the first five weeks of a new subscription, plus free shipping for the first week of subscriptions. To get this discount, you’ll need to verify through ID.me or GovXID.
OpenAI announced on Monday that it confidentially filed for an IPO, marking what could become one of the defining public offerings of the decade. And then there’s OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s other company, Tools for Humanity, which is reportedly conducting layoffs, according to Business Insider. TechCrunch has reached out to the company for confirmation.
You might know Tools for Humanity better through its verification project known as World — and its related device, a creepy silver orb that wants to scan your eyeballs. The idea is that the company will be able to verify people’s identities using unique iris scans, helping to distinguish human activity from bot activity in the increasingly automated world that Tools for Humanity co-founder and chairman Altman is constructing. The company would also use these scans to validate people’s identities to support the trade of its own cryptocurrency, Worldcoin.

These vague, suspicious ambitions were enough to raise money at a $2.5 billion valuation from investors like Andreessen Horowitz, Bain Capital, and other funds backing blockchain companies. But now the company is reportedly downsizing as it struggles to create revenue.
In the U.S., companies like Tinder, Zoom, and Docusign have partnered on Altman’s side project. Internationally, Tools for Humanity has faced regulatory and ethical concerns. In Kenya, India, and Hong Kong, for example, people were offered the equivalent of $50 in Worldcoin in exchange for their biometric data. Kenya later banned World from operating in the country, citing privacy and financial concerns; meanwhile, South Korea fined the company $830,000 for allegedly violating local privacy law.
Who would’ve thought? People don’t feel great about giving their biometric data to a startup in exchange for $50 worth of crypto.
Sneaky: Initially released in 1998, Thief is considered a landmark video game, particularly for the PC gaming industry. The Windows-exclusive title was groundbreaking in many ways and is now set to introduce a whole new generation of players to its pioneering first-person stealth gameplay.
Remake specialists at Nightdive Studios are working on yet another classic PC title. Thief: The Dark Project Remastered is a modern take on the groundbreaking 1998 stealth classic developed by Looking Glass Studios. The remaster is designed to preserve the original experience while updating the visuals for modern players.
Nightdive unveiled the project during the recent PC Gaming Show digital showcase. The studio highlighted the innovative gameplay that made Thief stand out in the late 90s, when most first-person games focused on shooting and direct combat. Instead, Thief challenged players to navigate carefully crafted environments, relying on stealth, timing, and observation rather than brute force to complete missions.
Thief played a pivotal role in popularizing the stealth genre and cast a long shadow over immersive sims and later stealth franchises such as Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell and Hitman. It was also the first game to successfully make environmental lighting and sound central gameplay mechanics, using sophisticated AI systems to create dynamic, emergent gameplay.
Like previous Nightdive remasters, Thief: The Dark Project Remastered will use the company’s KEX Engine to faithfully recreate the game’s stealth gameplay. The remaster will include the original missions, along with the additional content released in the 1999 Thief Gold edition.
According to the game’s Steam page, Thief Remastered should not require particularly modern hardware to run. As with System Shock 2 and other restored classics, Nightdive appears to be taking a conservative approach to updating the Looking Glass Studios original.
At the same time, the remaster is expected to include features modern players now take for granted. These include support for 4K resolution and high frame rates (up to 120 FPS), controller support, and improved textures, 3D models, and animations.
While the original Thief was released exclusively on PC, added controller support should also make it more accessible on modern consoles. The series continued with two sequels – Thief II: The Metal Age in 2000 and Thief: Deadly Shadows in 2004 – while Eidos-Montréal attempted a reboot in 2014 with Thief, which received mixed reviews.
‘There are things we want to do that are likely easier as a private company’, says OpenAI.
OpenAI has confidentially filed to go public, but said it could be a “while” before it ceases to be a private company.
“We have not decided on timing yet; it may be a while because there are things we want to do that are likely easier as a private company,” OpenAI said in a short statement yesterday (8 June). “But it’s a complicated set of trade-offs and this gives us the option to go public sooner if that ends up being best.”
Estimates from last year suggest an initial public offering (IPO) could value the ChatGPT-maker at up to $1trn, in one of the largest listings in history. The company, at the time, was expected to raise at least $60bn in the IPO.
While newer reports suggest that the company is also in talks with the US government in the hope that it purchases some of its shares once it goes public.
The IPO announcement comes just days after the $852bn AI company’s fiercest rival Anthropic also filed to go public.
Meanwhile, the tug of war for the biggest IPO raise is currently led by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which is expected to raise a targeted $75bn in its listing. The X and xAI parent company filed for an IPO late last month.
Anthropic – currently more valuable than OpenAI at $965bn – has been encroaching on its enterprise customer base, with reports from earlier this year finding that the Claude-parent was capturing a significant portion of first-time enterprise AI customers over OpenAI.
As a countermeasure, OpenAI is reportedly working on the biggest ChatGPT overhaul since its launch in 2022 to better compete with Anthropic, which has held a narrower focus on its enterprise business.
According to reports, the new desktop ‘superapp’ will focus strongly on OpenAI’s coding tool Codex, a move that reflects shifting interests from AI chatbots to agents that perform tasks for users. The app will also feature the AI chatbot, as well as the AI-powered browser Atlas.
OpenAI executives view ChatGPT as an introductory tool to encourage pick-up of higher-value products. The changes are expected to be rolled out in the coming weeks.
The company has also made big name hires to develop its “next generation of personal agents”, while shutting down less profitable ventures such as its Sora video generation model.
A majority of OpenAI’s 1bn monthly active ChatGPT customers use the free version of the tool. The company has between 5m and 9m business users, according to different blogs on its website, while the Financial Times reports that it has 2m businesses under its wing and 5m weekly active Codex users.
The company expects revenue from its business customers, which represents 40pc of its total revenue, to grow to 50pc by the end of the year.
Still, OpenAI is far from being profitable, making around $13bn in revenue last year with a planned spending of about $600bn by 2030.
Sources told CNBC earlier this year that the company projects its total revenue for 2030 to be more than $280bn – nearly 20-times its 2025 earnings – with near equal contributions from its consumer and enterprise businesses.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Most people don’t think about their online security until something goes wrong, and by then the damage to their identity, finances, or personal data has already been done.
That distance between complacency and consequence is exactly what McAfee Total Protection is built to close, and at 89% off, dropping from £84.99 to just £8.99 with the MCAFEE40 code, the only question is why you haven’t already sorted this.
McAfee Total Protection is now 89% off for 15 months on five devices, with antivirus, VPN and scam protection included.
The savings here are substantial enough that the question isn’t is this worth it, but whether £8.99 has ever bought more peace of mind.

Fifteen months of coverage across five devices for under a tenner is the kind of deal that reframes how you think about what security software actually costs per day to run.
The antivirus layer is the foundation, using AI-powered threat detection to catch both familiar and emerging malware across phones, tablets, and computers before anything takes hold.
What makes McAfee Total Protection more than just antivirus is the way it handles the threats that traditional virus scanners were never designed to catch, particularly the kind aimed at your identity rather than your machine.
The Scam Detector analyses incoming texts, emails, and video content in real time, flagging deepfakes and phishing attempts that would pass a casual glance from even a careful reader.


Identity Monitoring runs in the background around the clock, scanning the dark web for your personal information and alerting you immediately if anything surfaces that shouldn’t be out there.
The Secure VPN completes the picture by activating automatically on public Wi-Fi networks, encrypting your browsing, banking, and shopping activity without requiring you to remember to switch it on yourself.
Do note that a payment method is required to complete activation and the subscription renews automatically after the 15-month period, so it’s worth setting a reminder to review before the annual billing date arrives.
For anyone running multiple devices across a household and currently relying on nothing but instinct to stay safe online, the savings here are substantial enough that the question isn’t really whether McAfee Total Protection is worth it, but whether £8.99 has ever bought more peace of mind.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964
Weekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
French Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
Jensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
CryZENx Releases Fresh Playable Content Deep Inside Jabu-Jabu for His Ocarina of Time Remake
Trump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
Republicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
Senator Cynthia Lummis Calls CLARITY Act the Most Consequential Financial Legislation of This Generation
The Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
The Best Mystery Series of All Time Is Surging on Streaming 30 Years After It Ended
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
Microsoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
Microsoft unveils seven homegrown AI models in new bid for ‘long term self-sufficiency’
Trump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
Suspicious Polyfill login prompts pop up on Toshiba, Muji websites
Alexander Zverev wins the French Open to finally earn a 1st Grand Slam title
(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
PagerDuty, Inc. (PD) Presents at Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference Transcript
Anatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor
RCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
Meta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
You must be logged in to post a comment Login