Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Beef: When to Watch Season 2 on Netflix

Published

on

Expect more bottled-up frustration, resentment and insecurity this week as Netflix‘s anthology dramedy, Beef, returns for a second season with a fresh cast and setting. 

After picking up a trio of Emmy awards for its debut season, which starred Steven Yeun and Ali Wong, director and screenwriter Lee Sung Jin starts from a clean slate with an entirely different talent lineup. Great Gatsby star Carey Mulligan and Frankenstein’s Oscar Isaac lead the story as Joshua and Lindsay Martín, a couple whose marriage is more than rocky. Cailee Spaeny and Charles Melton play a newly engaged couple, Ashley and Austin, who both work under the Martíns.

Produced by A24 and featuring a soundtrack by Billie Eilish’s brother Finneas, Beef is set for more dark humor as season 2 delivers another high-stakes feud. Read on to find out more on how to stream Beef’s second season this month.

Advertisement

What’s the plot for Beef Season 2?

As with Season 1, this sophomore run of Beef centers around a big argument. But this time it’s between between Joshua and Lindsay, who are running an exclusive Southern California country club together. 

What starts off as a seemingly contained dispute quickly spirals, however, dragging in their friends and employees, including two staff members — the Gen Z couple played by Melton and Spaeny who witness their bosses’ shocking confrontation. 

The fallout from the argument triggers a chain of events, leading to both couples fighting for the approval of the club’s powerful billionaire owner played by Youn Yuh-jung. 

Advertisement

How to watch Beef Season 2

Beef’s entire eight-episode second season will arrive on April 16 on Netflix. The streaming service recently raised prices on its subscription plans, which now range from $9 to $27 a month. 

James Martin/CNET

Netflix offers three plans in the US, ranging from $9 a month for its ad-free version to $20 or $27 a month if you want to stream without ads. 

Advertisement

In the UK, the current pricing is £6 for Standard with Ads, £13 for Standard (Ad-Free) and £19 for Premium (Ad-Free). For Australian viewers, Standard with Ads comes in at AU$10, Standard (Ad-Free) is priced at AU$21, while Premium (Ad-Free) will set you back AU$30.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

After sale of its shoe business, Allbirds pivots to AI

Published

on

After selling its shoe brand and assets last month for $39 million, Allbirds is pivoting to AI. Of course, the company is also changing its name, since the footwear brand “Allbirds” was part of the sale. Introducing: NewBird AI, a “fully integrated GPU-as-a-Service and AI-native cloud solutions provider,” the company announced via its investor relations site on Wednesday.

The rebranded AI company also announced a $50 million investment from an undisclosed institutional investor in the form of a convertible financing facility.

It’s objectively pretty funny that Allbirds is becoming an AI company — not because it’s unusual for companies to pivot, but because of how extreme this pivot is. The maker of the shoes once craved by the Silicon Valley tech set is now going to be a provider of GPUs. It’s somewhat absurd — and risky — but you can see how the business came to this decision. After the asset and brand sale, Allbirds can keep the public company’s shell (it’s been traded on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “BIRD”) and then reuse it to invest in the hot AI sector.

This recalls the time in 2017 when the Long Island Iced Tea company pivoted to the blockchain, prompting the stock to jump some 275% after the rebranding. That pivot didn’t pan out, as the NASDAQ stock exchange delisted the stock the following year after Bitcoin fever died down.

Advertisement

Allbirds-turned-NewBird is likely hoping for a different outcome.

The company says that the financing and the asset sale are still subject to stockholder approval, with a meeting planned to take place on May 18. If the sale goes through, stockholders will receive a dividend during the third quarter. The new owner of the Allbirds brand and assets, American Exchange Group, will continue to make products for Allbirds customers.

Meanwhile, NewBird AI plans to use the new financing to acquire GPU assets, which it will offer to customers seeking AI compute capacity. Over time, the company hopes to grow its service offerings through partnerships and even strategic mergers and acquisitions — if the opportunity arises.

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This Country Is Home To The Most Deployed US Troops In 2026

Published

on





The United States has troops deployed all over the world, continuously growing and changing based on security and political priorities. U.S. troop numbers are estimated to be around 200,000 over the past decade, but the exact numbers could be different since the Pentagon doesn’t publish everything — these numbers could be higher. 

However, from what information we do have access to, we can see that Japan has the most U.S. troops, with 61,684 total personnel in 2025 — Japan isn’t considered a threat, but it does have high-tech next-gen fighter jets in the works. This number could have changed in 2026, however, after the start of the conflict in Iran. As of March 2026, there are 50,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East. 

The exact location of the troops is not public information, although they have historically been stationed around Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait. It’s not clear if the troops came from Japan or other countries with a lot of U.S. presence, which included Germany with 49,338 troops, South Korea with 26,722 troops, Italy with 15,365 troops, and the United Kingdom with 11,592 troops in 2025. This would shift these previous numbers as well.

Advertisement

What determines which countries U.S. troops are deployed in?

In general, U.S. troops are deployed based on the ever-changing geopolitical climate. If there is a country that seems more threatening to the United States’ safety, this is likely where troops would be deployed to. For this reason, the numbers are ever-changing based on politics, wars, tensions, and warnings — the goal is often to deter attacks, protect supply chains, and generally protecting national security. 

However, it seems like the United States has troops in areas where we aren’t currently feeling a lot of tension. For example, why are we in Japan? These stations are selected due to their navel access and rapid response capabilities. There are also some military bases that were built back in World War II that the United States continues to use, largely in Japan and Germany. This would explain why those two countries have so much military presence each year. The U.S. similarly set up bases in South Korea after the Korean War to fight communism as well as around Europe during the Cold War — in the early 1950s, there were over 400,000 troops around Europe to stop the Soviet Union from expanding. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Anker Soundcore Boom 2 Packs Real Power Into a Speaker Built for Real Life

Published

on

Soundcore Boom 2 by Anker Bluetooth Speaker
People prefer to bring this portable speaker with them on weekend treks or to backyard gatherings, and before long, they’re using it almost daily. For $90 (was $140), it punches far below what many people expect to pay for portable audio. Anker engineered the Boom 2 to endure whatever life throws at it and still create a sound that’s a lot greater than you’d expect from a speaker of this size.



The sound immediately fills the space, with a nice balance of highs and deep lows.That’s thanks to two tweeters and a separate subwoofer that produce a total of 80 watts of sound. The bass strikes strong enough to be noticeable on drum loops or electronic beats, but it remains under control, so you don’t have to worry about it getting too crazy. Voices are smooth and clear and come across effectively across all music kinds. Turn up the volume, and the speaker holds its own without becoming overly feedbacky or breaking up. The free app on your phone lets you become a little more adventurous with a 9-band equalizer and a few preset options, so you can tune in exactly the sound you like without having to fiddle around.

Sale


Soundcore Boom 2 By Anker, Outdoor Speaker, 80W, Subwoofer, BassUp 2.0, 24H Playtime, IPX7 Waterproof…
  • 80W Max Booming Bass: Feel the power of the bass in every song thanks to a racetrack subwoofer for added depth and clarity. And with BassUp 2.0, you…
  • 2.1 Stereo Clarity: A 50W racetrack subwoofer and dual 15W tweeters deliver crisp highs and deep bass, balanced by smart crossover technology, for an…
  • Listen All-Day Anywhere: Boom 2 outdoor speaker keep the beats playing for 24 hours on a single charge, and with the built-in power bank, you can keep…

The battery life is particularly impressive here, with users able to get up to 24 hours at moderate volumes with the lights and extra bass off.Heavy usage of those functions still provides plenty of hours before the device requires recharging. A USB-C port gets it back up and running in around 5.5 hours. The built-in USB-A output also functions as a power bank to top off your phone as needed, so one device covers music while keeping other gear operating.

Advertisement


This speaker’s compact size and built-in handle make it easy to transport.It weighs only approximately 4 pounds and dimensions 7 x 12 x 4 inches, so it fits easily into a backpack. An IPX7 rating means that a dunk in water will not harm it, and even if it falls into a lake or pool, it will simply float.The enclosed rear hatch protects the ports from getting wet in the rain.


It also has vibrant lighting for evening use, with the bright LEDs pulsing and shifting in a variety of patterns that either match the music or remain stable.You can manage the basic volume and power on the speaker, but the app allows you to be a little more creative with the lighting. Pairing up over Bluetooth 5.3 is a breeze to say the least, and the built-in microphone performs an excellent job of picking up calls for group chats without having to yell.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Most US teens say TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat aren’t hurting (or helping) their mental health

Published

on

Most teens in the United States say that Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat aren’t harming their mental health, though a slightly higher proportion report negative effects on their sleep and productivity, according to a new report from Pew Research. The report offers fresh insights into how teens perceive the effects of social media at a time when there are increasing calls to ban younger teens from social platforms altogether.

The report is based on a survey of 1,458 teens between the ages of 13 and 17. Teens were asked about their use of Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok and how those apps affect them. Pew also asked the teens’ parents to weigh in.

Relatively few teens reported negative mental health effects, with 9 percent of Snapchat and TikTok users and 11 percent of Instagram users saying they thought the services had hurt their mental health. More teens reported negative effects on sleep and productivity, however, especially when it comes to use of TikTok. Thirty-seven percent of teens said their use of the app had hurt their sleep and 29 percent reported that it had affected their productivity. Even so, the majority of teens responded that the apps had “neither helped nor hurt” their mental health, sleep or productivity.

Teens and their parents differed on the effects of social media platforms.

Teens and their parents differed on the effects of social media platforms. (Pew Research)

A significant number of teens did say that social media apps had helped their friendships, particularly Snapchat. At the same time, the app had a “somewhat higher rate” of bullying and harassment compared with the other services.

Advertisement

While the self-reported data is hardly a definitive answer to whether social media is harming teens, the numbers do offer a somewhat different narrative than the one that lawmakers, regulators and other critics have used to pursue social media bans and civil litigation against major companies. Meta, Snap and TikTok are all facing lawsuits that claim the platforms have purposefully created addicting features and enabled other harms to teen users,

Perhaps unsurprisingly, when researchers surveyed those same teens’ parents, they had a more negative view of the apps’ impact on their children. About four in ten parents said that social media hurts their kids’ sleep and productivity and about a quarter thought it hurt their mental health. Forty-four percent of parents whose teens use TikTok said they thought their child was spending “too much” time in the app.

“The share of parents who say the same of Snapchat and Instagram is lower,” the researchers note. “But the same pattern continues for both, with parents being more likely than teens to describe their teens’ use of these sites as excessive.”

The report isn’t the first time Pew has polled teens on their relationship with social media. Last year, a separate report found that teens were becoming more worried about social media, though they were less likely to say they had been negatively impacted on a personal level.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

China’s New Drone Swarm System Allegedly Controls Over 90 Aircraft At A Time

Published

on





Drones have grown out of being support tools that provide reconnaissance to something that entire wars are fought on. And when hundreds of units are deployed at a time, it sometimes makes sense to control them as a group rather than waste time and resources handling each unit individually. China is claiming to do just that with its new drone swarm operations system. The country’s state broadcaster CCTV has shown what it says is an entire fleet of drones being controlled by a single person.

The footage, aired on March 25, showed Atlas — the name of the system — reportedly running a complete operational chain. Three visually similar targets were placed in a strike zone, and Atlas allegedly controlled everything on its own. That includes coordinating reconnaissance, figuring out on its own which one was the command vehicle, opening its launcher, and sending drones after it. At the end of it, the drones are seen locking onto those targets mid-flight and hitting them precisely.

Advertisement

Making all this possible is the Swarm-2 ground combat vehicle, which serves as the launch platform. It first popped up at Airshow China 2024 in Zhuhai, which is the same event where some of China’s most advanced military weapons have debuted. Each Swarm-2 is said to carry and fire off 48 fixed-wing drones. Then there’s a separate command vehicle that can reportedly manage up to 96 drones at once, which means two launchers feeding into a single control point. CCTV compares this to one person flying 100 kites on a single string. A support vehicle rounds out the fleet, handling logistics and maintenance during longer operations in the field. The launch vehicle is seen with the logo of China Electronics Technology Group Corp slapped across its side, which is one of the country’s biggest state-owned defense contractors.

Advertisement

The algorithms tying it all together

Making everything work together so seamlessly is an advanced swarm-control algorithm. The algorithm is claimed to give each drone the ability to make its own decisions. They share information in real time, adjust their positions accordingly, and coordinate tight formations even at high speeds. They’re also smart enough to adapt to environmental factors like wind speed changes and airflow disturbances, all on their own. They don’t have to wait for new instructions for the basic stuff.

Moreover, thanks to a modular design, the system also allows multiple battlefield applications. For instance, the system can also perform saturation attacks. That basically involves flooding enemy air defenses with drones from multiple directions and in multiple waves. Defenders get overwhelmed and simply can’t keep up. It’s worth mentioning here that China is also developing the other side of that equation — its Hurricane 3000 microwave weapon, which is specifically designed to shoot down drones in bulk.

Drones powered by Atlas can also loiter over a target and watch it continuously prior to attack. This significantly boosts precision. And for more long-range applications, drones with ranges stretching up to thousands of kilometers can fly low and slow, making detection difficult — at least initially.

Wang Yunfei, a Chinese military expert who spoke to the Global Times, said that all this has only been possible thanks to China’s massive progress in AI. But China isn’t alone in such advancements, as the U.S. has also been exploring ways to upgrade its own swarm tech with battlefield-tested Ukrainian UAVs.

Advertisement

That said, it’s worth keeping in mind that everything we know about Atlas comes from Chinese state media and state-affiliated experts. None of these capabilities have been independently verified.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

A Tale Of Cheap Hard Drives And Expensive Lessons

Published

on

When it comes to electronic gadgets, I’m a sucker for a good deal. If it’s got a circuit board on the inside and a low enough price tag on the outside, you can be pretty sure I’ll be taking it home with me. So a few years ago, when I saw USB external hard drives on the shelf of a national discount chain for just $10, I couldn’t resist picking one up. What I didn’t realize at the time however, was that I’d be getting more in the bargain than just some extra storage space.

It’s a story that I actually hadn’t thought of for some time — it only came to mind recently after reading about how the rising cost of computer components has pushed more users to the secondhand market than ever before. That makes the lessons from this experience, for both the buyer and the seller, particularly relevant.

What’s in the Box?

It wasn’t just the low price that attracted me to these hard drives, it was also the stated capacity. They were listed as 80 GB, which is an unusually low figure to see on a box in 2026. Obviously nobody is making 80 GB drives these days, so given the price, my first thought was that it would contain a jerry-rigged USB flash drive. But if that was the case, you would expect the capacity to be some power of two.

Upon opening up the case, what I found inside was somehow both surprising and incredibly obvious. The last thing I expected to see was an actual spinning hard drive, but only because I lacked the imagination of whoever put this product together. I was thinking in terms of newly manufactured, modern, hardware. Instead, this drive was nearly 20 years old, and must have been available for pennies on the dollar since they were presumably just collecting dust in a warehouse somewhere.

Advertisement

Or at least, that’s what I assumed. After all, surely nobody would have the audacity to take a take a bunch of ancient used hard drives and repackage them as new products…right?

Certified Pre-Owned

Once I saw that the drive inside the enclosure was older than both of my children, I got curious about its history. Especially given the scuff marks and dirt on the drive itself. A new old stock drive from 2008 is one thing, but if this drive actually had any time on the clock, that’s a very different story. Forget the implications of selling used merchandise as new — if the drive has seen significant use, even $10 is a steep price.

Fortunately, we can easily find out this information through Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology (SMART). Using the smartctl tool, we can get a readout of all the drive’s SMART parameters and figure out what we’re dealing with:

Well, now we know why these things are so cheap. According to the SMART data, this particular drive has gone through 9,538 power cycles and accumulated a whopping 31,049 hours of total powered on time. I’ll save you the math, that’s a little over 3.5 years.

Advertisement

Note that all of the attributes are either Old_age or Pre-fail. The term “used” barely covers it, this drive has been beat to hell.

Buried Treasure

It’s a fair bet that anyone finding themselves regularly reading Hackaday possesses an inquisitive mind. So at his point, I’m willing to bet you’re wondering the same thing I did: if this drive has been used for years, could it still contain files from its previous life?

Obviously it was formatted before getting boxed up and put back on the shelf. But frankly, anyone who’s unscrupulous enough to pass off decades-old salvaged drives as new probably isn’t putting in the effort to make sure said drives are securely wiped.

I was willing to bet that the drive went through nothing more than a standard quick format, and that even a simplistic attempt at file recovery would return some interesting results. As it so happens, “Simplistic Attempt” is basically my middle name, so I fired up PhotoRec and pointed it at our bargain drive.

It only took a few minutes before the file counters started jumping, proving that no effort was made to properly sanitize the drive before repackaging it. So not only is this drive old and used, but it still contains information from wherever it was for all those years. If it came from an individual’s personal computer, the information could be private in nature. If it was a business machine, the files may contain valuable proprietary data.

Advertisement

In this case, it looks to be a little of both. I didn’t spend a lot of time poring over the recovered files, but I spot checked enough of them to know that there’s somebody in China who probably wouldn’t be too happy to know their old hard drive ended up on the shelf in an American discount store.

For one thing we’ve got hundreds of personal photographs, ranging from vacation shots to formal portraits.

The pictures show fun in the sun, but the DOC and PDF files are all business. I won’t reveal the name of the company this individual worked for, but I found business proposals for various civil engineering projects within the Minhang District of Shanghai worth millions of dollars.

Advertisement

Once is Happenstance….

I know what you’re wondering, Dear Reader. If the first drive I pulled off the shelf happened to have a trove of personal and professional information on it, what are the chances that it would happen again? Perhaps it was a fluke, and the rest of the drives would be blank.

That’s an excellent question, and of course we can’t make a determination either way with only a single point of data. Which is why I went back the next day and bought three more drives.

Right off the bat, it’s worth noting that no two drives are actually the same. Two are Western Digital and two are Fujitsu, but none of them have the same model number. The keen-eyed reader will also note that one of the drives is 100 GB, but it has been partitioned to 80 GB to match the others.

Three of the drives were manufactured in 2008, and one is from 2007. I won’t go through the SMART data for each one, but suffice it to say that each drive has several thousand hours on the clock. Although for what it’s worth, the first drive is the lifetime leader by far.

Advertisement

In terms of file recovery, each drive gave up several gigabytes worth of data. In addition to the one we’ve already looked at, two more were clearly the primary drives in Windows boxes, and each contained a mix of personal data and technical documents such as AutoCAD drawings, datasheets, bills of materials, and schematics. Given their contents, I would guess the drives came from off-lease computers that were used by engineering firms.

The fourth drive was different. It contained more than 32 GBs worth of Hollywood movies, the most recent of which was released in 2010. I imagine this drive came out of somebody’s media center. Now I haven’t sailed the high seas, as it were, since my teenage years, but even if I had wanted to add these titles to my ill-gotten trove of films, it was a non-starter. Given the time period they were downloaded in, most of them were below DVD resolution.

Plus, they were all dubbed in Chinese. Not exactly my idea of a movie night.

A Cautionary Tale

Admittedly, given that they were being sold in a home electronics chain-store, the likelihood that these drives would be purchased by somebody with the means to extract any meaningful data from them isn’t very high. But since you’re reading this, you know the chances clearly aren’t zero. I didn’t have any malicious intent, but the same can’t necessarily be said for others.

So what can we take away from this? To start with, if you’re planning on selling or giving away any of your old drives, make sure they are properly wiped. In the dusty past, the recommendation would have been to use the Linux-based Darik’s Boot and Nuke (DBAN) live CD, but the project was was acquired back in 2012 and development was halted a few years later. Luckily, the GPLv2 tool that DBAN actually ran against the drive was forked and is now available as nwipe.

Advertisement

But as mentioned earlier, I get the impression that these drives were from businesses that unloaded their old machines. In that case, the users can’t really be blamed, as they wouldn’t have been able to wipe the drives even if they knew ahead of time their work computers were getting swapped out. But they certainly could have made an effort to keep their personal data off of company property. It’s one thing to have some corporate secrets stolen down the line, but you don’t want pictures of your kids to be in the mix.

In short, nobody cares about what happens with your personal data more than you do, so make sure it doesn’t get away from you. Otherwise some bargain-hunting nerd might be pawing through it in a few years.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Adobe Is Working With Anthropic to Bring a Creative AI Agent to Claude

Published

on

Adobe is diving deeper into agentic AI and expanding its partnership roster in a new deal with the AI developer Anthropic. Adobe on Wednesday introduced its latest conversational, agentic creative assistant, which is the technological foundation for its work with Anthropic.

Firefly is the hub for all things Adobe AI, with integrations across other popular Creative Cloud apps such as Photoshop, Acrobat and Premiere Pro. The new Firefly AI assistant is agentic, which means that it can perform tasks with minimal human oversight. You can upload a batch of photos and have the AI edit them for you, automatically adjusting the lighting and cropping, for example. One way to think about it is as a new school AI tool that you can use to do old-school, or non-generative, editing. 

Adobe has been building assistants into its creative software for a while now. It introduced AI assistants in Adobe Express and Photoshop back in October. Agentic AI tools like the kind Adobe is building are becoming rapidly popular across the entire AI industry, with tools like Claude Code and OpenClaw shaking up legacy tech companies.

Advertisement

This new partnership brings Adobe’s creative agent to Claude. This is Claude’s first major creative AI tool, expanding the popular app’s capabilities beyond the coding and enterprise prowess it’s known for.

Adobe wrote in its blog post that it is “enabling creators to access the best of Adobe directly across the surfaces where they work every day,” by bringing its tools to third-party models like Claude. Anthropic declined to comment.

Firefly AI assistant window where the AI is retouching a headshot

This is an example of how the Firefly assistant can make photo edits by itself.

Advertisement

Adobe

More details about the Adobe connector to Claude should be released in the coming weeks, including the exact date it will become available. The Firefly assistant will be released as a public beta later this month.

There are a few other Firefly updates that are available now. Firefly’s video editor is getting better audio, advanced coloring options and more integrations with Adobe Stock. Firefly’s image editing suite is also getting a few upgrades. New Kling models, Kling 3.0 and 3.0 Omni, will also be added to the 30-plus outside AI models that creators can use through Firefly.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

7 Of The Most Powerful American Engines Ever Built

Published

on





If there’s one thing the American automotive industry is probably best known for, it’s engines. Big ones, too, with plenty of classic, high-speed muscle cars from the 1960s sporting 400 cubic-inch V8s making healthy amounts of power. But while those engines that gearheads may look back on with fondness were very capable in their heyday, they’re not really all that powerful compared to what American automakers have to offer now.

Engines like the 426 HEMI might be iconic (and deservedly so, might we add), but its advertised 425 hp and 490 lb-ft of torque pales in comparison to big-power modern V8s from the likes of GM, Ford, and Dodge. These automakers have continued pushing the horsepower envelope forward with each passing decade, breaking past barriers that engineers working in the ’60s and ’70s probably thought were outright impossible.

Advertisement

American carmakers don’t have a monopoly on big, high-performance power plants, of course. Some of the world’s most powerful V8s, for example, are the products of European automakers and their engineers. But that’s another topic for another time; for now, let’s dive into the world of high-power American engines and see just how crazy they can get.

Advertisement

Dodge Viper V10 — 645 hp

The legendarily hard-to-drive Dodge Viper was, arguably, one of the most iconic American vehicles of its day. From its outrageous design to the massive V10 under the hood, the Viper was, and will likely always remain, a unique and likely impossible-to-replicate performance car. That said, the 1991 Viper’s 8.0-liter V10 only made 400 hp, which is honestly pretty tame by modern standards — and wasn’t necessarily earth-shattering even back then.

Dodge increased the Viper V10’s power and displacement over the years, though. The first bump came in 2003 with the third-gen Viper’s 8.3-liter, 500-hp power plant, followed soon by another bump to 8.4 liters and 600 hp in 2008. While these numbers are solid, some might feel that the V10 never quite made the amount of power one might hope from such a massive engine. That said, its final iteration was at least good enough to earn a place on this list.

In 2013, Dodge unveiled the fifth-generation VX I Viper, which boasted several improvements over its predecessors. It was a comfier and more luxurious car, with higher-quality materials and a more accommodating interior. Things improved under the hood, too: The 8.4-liter V10 now made 640 hp and 600 lb-ft of torque, good enough for Chrysler to claim that it was the most powerful naturally aspirated sports car engine on the market. The Viper’s engineers weren’t quite done, though, and they managed to squeeze out an extra 5 hp for 2015, bumping the V10’s output to 645 hp — a number it retained until the end of production in 2017.

Advertisement

Chevrolet LT6 — 670 hp

Chevrolet’s LS series of small-block V8s may be the more recognizable of the automaker’s modern compact performance powerplants — and an incredibly popular choice for engine swaps the world over — but if it’s power you want, the newer LT engines are the ones to pay attention to. Case in point: The 5.5-liter LT6, which debuted in the 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 with an impressive 670 hp and 460 lb-ft of torque. 

One of the secrets to the LT6’s impressive power output is the flat-plane crankshaft that Chevy engineers adopted for the engine. While we don’t have the space to dig into the differences between cross-plane and flat-plane cranks here, the gist is that flat-plane crankshafts require less balancing and are thus lighter. This, in turn, allows designers to make an engine that revs incredibly high and makes a lot of power while doing so; the LT6 specifically generates its 670 hp at 8,400 rpm, with redline arriving at 8,600 rpm.

It’s not solely down to the crankshaft design, of course: Chevy engineers pulled out all the stops to make nearly 700 hp from a 5.5-liter engine without the aid of boost. Other clever tricks include a high-flow exhaust, an oversquare bore and stroke that reduces piston speed at high revs, and an active intake manifold that rams extra air into the combustion chamber via a behavior known as resonance supercharging to squeeze as much power as possible out of the LT6. The result is a naturally aspirated small-block V8 that’s easily one of the most powerful Corvette engines ever.

Advertisement

Chevrolet Performance ZZ632/1000 — 1,004 hp

Not all mega-powerful American engines come installed in cars from the factory; instead, some ship as crate engines. One of the most pertinent examples is the Chevrolet Performance ZZ632/1000. As the name indicates, the ZZ632 is a massive 632 cubic-inch tall-deck, big-block V8 that, as shipped, is good for 1,004 hp and 876 lb-ft of torque.

Advertisement

The ZZ632 is a modern entry in Chevy’s storied lineage of big block engines, with the powerplant flying the same flag once flown by iconic big blocks like the 454 that powered the C3 ‘Vette, Monte Carlo and Caprice. Just with a lot more power, of course. However, unlike many other modern 1,000-hp American V8s, the ZZ632/1000 manages it without forced induction; instead, it’s a naturally aspirated motor that makes a strong argument for the old adage of there being no replacement for displacement.

Chevy predictably equips the ZZ632 with heavy-duty components to handle all that power (and 12.0:1 compression). It boasts forged internals all around barring the camshaft, which is billet steel. The rest, including the pistons, crankshaft, and rocker arms, are all forged aluminum or steel of some sort. It also has fuel injectors that deliver 86 pounds-per-hour and makes its headline figures on 93 octane gas — no E85 necessary here. There have been plenty of engine swaps featuring the ZZ632 over the years, but one of the most memorable is likely Hot Rod magazine’s yellow 1957 Chevy known as Project X, which got a ZZ632/1000 in a 2023 episode of “Hot Rod Garage.”

Advertisement

Dodge Hellephant — 1,000/1,025 hp

What carries more weight than a Hellcat? If you ask Dodge, it’s the Hellephant. The automaker has used the name for two distinct engines, both of which one-upped the already powerful Hellcat engines by generating four-figure power numbers.

Dodge first revealed the 426 Hellephant at the 2018 SEMA show, where it sat in the engine bay of a restomodded ’68 Charger. The engine was based on the 6.2-liter Hellcat but achieved 1,000 hp and 950 lb-ft of torque on pump gas via several mods. These included an aluminum engine block, a 3.0-liter supercharger, special forged pistons, and an aggressive, high-lift camshaft, amongst other upgrades. Availability was very limited to start with, however, with units selling out within 48 hours and later delayed due to camshaft issues.

In 2023, Dodge released the Dodge Challenger SRT Demon 170, with a 6.2-liter, 1,025-hp (on E85) Hellephant engine under the hood. Changes for this HEMI included a new 3.0-liter supercharger (with more boost courtesy of a 3.02-inch pulley) and a larger throttle body. Like the 426 Hellephant, Dodge sold the engine as a crate motor, calling it the Hellephant C170. As of mid-2026, Direct Connection has two variants of the Hellephant listed: The E85-capable, 6.2-liter 1,025-hp C170 and the 1,000-hp Hellephant A30 426 that it reintroduced in 2025. The C170 is technically the more powerful of the two, but we felt both were deserving of equal billing here — what’s 25 horsepower between friends, after all?

Advertisement

Chevrolet LT7 — 1,064 hp

The 670-hp LT6 that debuted in the 2023 C8 Corvette Z06 was already very powerful, especially for a naturally aspirated powerplant. Despite that, even the most casual petrolhead would have guessed that there was predictably no way that the automaker was going to stick with a sub-700-hp engine for the C8 ZR1. And this hypothetical individual was proven very, very right in 2024, when Chevy revealed that the ZR1 would make 1,064 hp from its 5.5-liter, twin-turbocharged LT7 engine.

Advertisement

Chevy’s chosen name is, of course, indicative of the engine’s family resemblance to the LT6, but there’s more to separate the two engines than the turbos. These include chunkier internals — with forged titanium connecting rods and all-new forged aluminum pistons — and altered cylinder heads to accept the 20 PSI that the turbos put out. This head casting also allows for both port and direct fuel injection, unlike the direct injection-only LT6. Another difference is that the engine designers developed an anti-lag system for the LT7, ensuring it stays in boost. Paired with a similarly upgraded transmission, the LT7’s 1,064 hp pushed the ZR1 to a record-breaking 233 mph top speed in 2024.

While the LT7’s raw power is the focus of this list, it would be remiss of us not to mention the electrified 1,250-hp Corvette ZR1x. This latest iteration of the C8 ‘Vette pairs the LT7 with a modified version of the front motor from the Corvette E-Ray, making for what is likely to be the quickest (and fastest) Corvette ever.

Advertisement

SSC Tuatara V8 — 1,350/1,750 hp

While naturally aspirated, high-power V8s are undoubtedly impressive, getting huge power numbers out of eight cylinders invariably requires a bit of help, be it from a supercharger or twin turbos. Dodge went down the former route with the 1,000-hp Hellephant, while Chevy went for the latter to squeeze 1,064 hp out of the 5.5-liter LT7. But both of those pale in comparison to what Nelson Racing Engines (NRE) and SSC cooked up for the SSC Tuatara.

The Tuatara’s V8 is a 5.9-liter V8 that rocks dual 76mm NRE turbos and a flat-plane crankshaft that allows it to rev up to a dizzying 8,800 rpm. To allow the engine to get up that high, NRE engineers designed a large-bore, short-stroke engine to keep piston speeds down. Similarly, short-skirt pistons and lightweight titanium connecting rods ensure that the V8’s rotating assembly is lightweight enough to allow the engine to rev safely to nearly 9,000 rpm. It’s admittedly not quite one of the highest-revving production car engines ever, but it’s still plenty impressive for a such a large V8.

Cooling the hot air from NRE’s in-house twin turbos are two air-to-water intercoolers located in the intake manifold. These allegedly halve the intake air temperature and help squeeze out even more power from the engine. The final icing on the cake of ultra-high-horsepower is, of course, biofuel: The V8 makes its 1,750 hp when gassed up with ethanol or methanol. Without it, you’re looking at a paltry 1,350 hp instead. Still great, but not nearly as great as 1,750 hp.

Advertisement

Hennessey Fury V8 — 1,817/2,031 hp

Hennessey Performance is known for building many incredibly powerful vehicles, from a 1,200-hp version of the Cadillac CTS-V to the 1,400-hp Venom GT based on the Lotus Exige. But while all of those were indeed impressive achievements, the engine powering company’s most recent hypercar (as of 2026) easily bests them all: Say hello to the Fury V8.

Advertisement

This ludicrously overpowered engine was revealed alongside the Venom F5 in 2020, with frankly mind-boggling numbers straight from the off. Hennessey claimed that the twin-turbocharged, 6.6-liter V8, which was based on GM’s classic LS small-block V8, would make 1,817 hp and a ludicrous 1,193 lb-ft of torque. While we’re not sure if any third-party outlet ever dared to take a Venom F5 to the dyno, we don’t see any reason to doubt those numbers, not least due to the F5’s impressive 221-mph half-mile and our own Dave McQuiling’s experience behind the wheel of one back in 2024.

Managing just over 1,800 hp from a 6.6-liter V8 would already have guaranteed the Hennessey and its Fury V8 a place in the history books, but the Texas-based tuner was far from done. In 2025, Hennessey announced the Evolution package for the Venom F5, which bumped output up to an even crazier 2,031 hp and 1,445 lb-ft of torque. This extra 200 hp or so comes courtesy of new turbos, updated billet aluminum pistons, higher-flow injectors, and lighter valve covers — and E85 fuel, of course.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

April updates trigger BitLocker key prompts on some servers

Published

on

Windows BitLocker

Microsoft confirmed on Tuesday that some Windows Server 2025 devices will boot into BitLocker recovery after installing the April 2026 KB5082063 Windows security update.

BitLocker is a Windows security feature that encrypts storage drives to prevent data theft. Windows computers typically enter BitLocker recovery mode after hardware changes or events such as TPM (Trusted Platform Module) updates, to regain access to protected drives that have not been unlocked via the default unlock mechanism.

“Some devices with an unrecommended BitLocker Group Policy configuration might be required to enter their BitLocker recovery key on the first restart after installing this update,” Microsoft said.

Wiz

“In this scenario, the BitLocker recovery key only needs to be entered once — subsequent restarts will not trigger a BitLocker recovery screen, as long as the group policy configuration remains unchanged.”

However, as the company explained, this only happens for very specific configurations, on systems where all the following conditions are met:

Advertisement
  1. BitLocker is enabled on the OS drive.
  2. The Group Policy “Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations” is configured, and PCR7 is included in the validation profile (or the equivalent registry key is set manually).
  3. System Information (msinfo32.exe) reports that the Secure Boot State PCR7 Binding is “Not Possible“.
  4. The Windows UEFI CA 2023 certificate is present in the device’s Secure Boot Signature Database (DB), making the device eligible for the 2023‑signed Windows Boot Manager to be made the default.
  5. The device is not already running the 2023-signed Windows Boot Manager.

Microsoft added that this known issue is unlikely to affect personal devices, as impacted configurations are typically found on systems managed by enterprise IT teams.

BitLocker recovery screen
BitLocker recovery screen (Microsoft)

​The company is now working on a solution to this issue and has shared temporary workarounds that allow installation of this month’s security updates.

Admins are advised to remove the Group Policy configuration before deploying the KB5082063 update, and to ensure that BitLocker bindings use the PCR7 profile by following these steps.

Those who can’t remove the PCR7 group policy before installing can apply a Known Issue Rollback (KIR) on affected devices to prevent the automatic switch to the 2023 Boot Manager and to avoid triggering BitLocker recovery.

In May 2025, Microsoft released emergency updates to address a similar issue that was causing Windows 10 systems to boot into BitLocker recovery after installing the May 2025 security updates.

One year earlier, in August 2024, Microsoft fixed another known issue triggering BitLocker recovery prompts across all supported Windows versions after installing the July 2024 Windows security updates.

Advertisement

In August 2022, Windows devices also became stuck at a BitLocker recovery prompt after installing the KB5012170 security update.

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google leaders including Demis Hassabis push back on claim of uneven AI adoption internally

Published

on

A viral post on X from veteran programmer and former Google engineer Steve Yegge set off a rhetorical firestorm this week, drawing sharp public rebuttals from some of Google’s most prominent AI leaders and reopening a sensitive question for the company: how deeply are its own engineers really using the latest generation of AI coding tools?

The debate began after Yegge summarized what he said was the view of his friend, a current and longtime Google employee (or Googler), who claimed the Gemini AI-firm’s internal AI adoption looks much more ordinary and less cutting-edge than outsiders might expect.

Yegge said Googler friend claimed Google engineering mirrors an “average” industry pattern of a 20%-60%-20% split: a small group of outright AI refusers (20%) a much larger middle still relying mainly on simpler chat and coding-assistant workflows (60%), and another small group of AI-first, cutting-edge engineers using agentic tools extensively and mastering them (20%).

A VentureBeat search of X using its parent company’s AI assistant Grok found that Yegge’s April 13 post spread quickly, topping 4,500 likes, 205 quote posts, 458 replies and 1.9 million views as of April 14.

Advertisement

We’ve reached out to Google for comment on the claims and will update when we receive a response.

A veteran, oustpoken Googler voice

Why did the opinion of Yegge’s unnamed Googler friend land so hard? In part because Yegge is not just another commentator taking shots from the sidelines.

He spent about 13 years at Google after earlier stints at Amazon and GeoWorks, later joined Grab, and then became head of engineering at Sourcegraph in 2022. He has long been known in software circles for widely read essays on programming and engineering culture, and for an earlier internal Google memo that accidentally became public in 2011 and drew broad media attention.

That history helps explain why engineers and executives still take his critiques seriously, even when they reject them.

Advertisement

Yegge has built a reputation over many years as a blunt insider-outsider voice on software culture, someone with enough standing in the industry that his judgments can travel fast, especially when they touch nerves inside big technology companies.

Wikipedia’s summary of his career notes his long Google tenure and the outsized attention his blog posts and prior Google critiques have received.

Unpacking Yegge’s friend’s argument

In this case, Yegge’s argument was not simply that Google uses too little AI. It was that the company’s adoption may be uneven, culturally constrained and less transformed than its branding implies.

His friend supposedly argued that some Googlers could not use Anthropic’s Claude Code because it was framed as “the enemy,” and that Gemini was not yet sufficient for the fullest agentic coding workflows. He contrasted Google with what he described as a smaller set of companies moving much faster.

Advertisement

Pushback from Hassabis and current Googlers

The first major pushback came from Demis Hassabis, the co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, who replied directly and forcefully. “Maybe tell your buddy to do some actual work and to stop spreading absolute nonsense. This post is completely false and just pure clickbait,” Hassabis wrote.

Other Google leaders followed with lengthier defenses.

Addy Osmani, a director at Google Cloud AI, wrote that Yegge’s account “doesn’t match the state of agentic coding at our company.” He added, “Over 40K SWEs use agentic coding weekly here.”

Osmani said Googlers have access to internal tools and systems including “custom models, skills, CLIs and MCPs,” and pushed back on the idea that Google employees are sealed off from outside models, writing that “folks can even use @AnthropicAI’s models on Vertex” and concluding that “Google is anything but average.”

Advertisement

Other current Google employees reinforced that message. Jaana Dogan, a software engineer at Google, wrote in a quote tweet: “Everyone I work with uses @antigravity like every second of the day,” later following up with another X post stating: “Unpopular opinion: If you think tokens burned is a productivity metric, no one should take you seriously. Imagine you are a top 0.0001% writer and they are only counting the tokens you produce.”

Paige Bailey, a DevX engineering lead at Google DeepMind, said teams had agents “running 24/7.”

Several other Google and DeepMind figures also challenged Yegge’s characterization, some disputing the factual basis of his claims and others suggesting he lacked visibility into current internal usage.

Yegge’s rebuttal

Yegge, for his part, did not retreat. In a follow-up to Hassabis, he wrote, “I’m not trying to misrepresent anyone,” but argued that by his own standard for advanced AI adoption, Google still does not appear to be doing especially well.

Advertisement

He pointed to token usage and the replacement of older development habits with truly agentic workflows as the more meaningful benchmark, and said he would be willing to retract his criticism if Google could show its engineers were operating at that level.

AI adoption vs. AI transformation

That leaves the core dispute unresolved, but clearer. This is less a fight over whether Google engineers use AI at all than a fight over what should count as meaningful adoption.

Googlers are pointing to scale, weekly usage and the availability of internal and external tools. Yegge is arguing that those measures may capture broad exposure without proving a deeper change, an AI transformation, in how engineering work gets done. The clash reflects a wider industry split between visible usage metrics and more transformative, power-user behavior.

For Google, the subject is especially sensitive. Yegge has criticized the company before, including in a 2018 essay explaining why he left, where he argued Google had become too risk-averse and had lost much of its ability to innovate.

Advertisement

If his latest critique had come from a lesser-known poster, it might have faded. Coming from a former longtime Google engineer with a record of memorable public criticism, it instead drew direct responses from some of the company’s top AI figures — and turned a single post into a broader public argument about whether Google’s AI leadership is as deep internally as it looks from the outside.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025