Five years ago, Databricks coined the term ‘data lakehouse’ to describe a new type of data architecture that combines a data lake with a data warehouse. That term and data architecture are now commonplace across the data industry for analytics workloads.

Now, Databricks is once again looking to create a new category with its Lakebase service, now generally available today. While the data lakehouse construct deals with OLAP (online analytical processing) databases, Lakebase is all about OLTP (online transaction processing) and operational databases. The Lakebase service has been in development since June 2025 and is based on technology Databricks gained via its acquisition of PostgreSQL database provider Neon. It was further enhanced in October of 2025 with the acquisition of Mooncake, which brought capabilities to help bridge PostgreSQL with lakehouse data formats.

Lakebase is a serverless operational database that represents a fundamental rethinking of how databases work in the age of autonomous AI agents. Early adopters, including easyJet, Hafnia and Warner Music Group, are cutting application delivery times by 75 to 95%, but the deeper architectural innovation positions databases as ephemeral, self-service infrastructure that AI agents can provision and manage without human intervention.

This isn’t just another managed Postgres service. Lakebase treats operational databases as lightweight, disposable compute running on data lake storage rather than monolithic systems requiring careful capacity planning and database administrator (DBA) oversight.

 “Really, for the vibe coding trend to take off, you need developers to believe they can actually create new apps very quickly, but you also need the central IT team, or DBAs, to be comfortable with the tsunami of apps and databases,” Databricks co-founder Reynold Xin told VentureBeat. “Classic databases simply won’t scale to that because they can’t afford to put a DBA per database and per app.”

92% faster delivery: From two months to five days

The production numbers demonstrate immediate impact beyond the agent provisioning vision. Hafnia reduced delivery time for production-ready applications from two months to five days — or 92% — using Lakebase as the transactional engine for their internal operations portal. The shipping company moved beyond static BI reports to real-time business applications for fleet, commercial and finance workflows.

EasyJet consolidated more than 100 Git repositories into just two and cut development cycles from nine months to four months — a 56% reduction — while building a web-based revenue management hub on Lakebase to replace a decade-old desktop app and one of Europe’s largest legacy SQL Server environments.

Warner Music Group is moving insights directly into production systems using the unified foundation, while Quantum Capital Group uses it to maintain consistent, governed data for identifying and evaluating oil and gas investments — eliminating the data duplication that previously forced teams to maintain multiple copies in different formats.

The acceleration stems from the elimination of two major bottlenecks: database cloning for test environments and ETL pipeline maintenance for syncing operational and analytical data.

Technical architecture: Why this isn’t just managed Postgres

Traditional databases couple storage and compute — organizations provision a database instance with attached storage and scale by adding more instances or storage. AWS Aurora innovated by separating these layers using proprietary storage, but the storage remained locked inside AWS’s ecosystem and wasn’t independently accessible for analytics.

Lakebase takes the separation of storage and compute to its logical conclusion by putting storage directly in the data lakehouse. The compute layer runs essentially vanilla PostgreSQL— maintaining full compatibility with the Postgres ecosystem — but every write goes to lakehouse storage in formats that Spark, Databricks SQL and other analytics engines can immediately query without ETL.

“The unique technical insight was that data lakes decouple storage from compute, which was great, but we need to introduce data management capabilities like governance and transaction management into the data lake,” Xin explained. “We’re actually not that different from the lakehouse concept, but we’re building lightweight, ephemeral compute for OLTP databases on top.”

Databricks built Lakebase with the technology it gained from the acquisition of Neon. But Xin emphasized that Databricks significantly expanded Neon’s original capabilities to create something fundamentally different.

“They didn’t have the enterprise experience, and they didn’t have the cloud scale,” Xin said. “We brought the Neon team’s novel architectural idea together with the robustness of the Databricks infrastructure and combined them. So now we’ve created a super scalable platform.”

From hundreds of databases to millions built for agentic AI

Xin outlined a vision directly tied to the economics of AI coding tools that explains why the Lakebase construct matters beyond current use cases. As development costs plummet, enterprises will shift from buying hundreds of SaaS applications to building millions of bespoke internal applications.

“As the cost of software development goes down, which we’re seeing today because of AI coding tools, it will shift from the proliferation of SaaS in the last 10 to 15 years to the proliferation of in-house application development,” Xin said. “Instead of building maybe hundreds of applications, they’ll be building millions of bespoke apps over time.”

This creates an impossible fleet management problem with traditional approaches. You cannot hire enough DBAs to manually provision, monitor and troubleshoot thousands of databases. Xin’s solution: Treat database management itself as a data problem rather than an operations problem.

Lakebase stores all telemetry and metadata — query performance, resource utilization, connection patterns, error rates — directly in the lakehouse, where it can be analyzed using standard data engineering and data science tools. Instead of configuring dashboards in database-specific monitoring tools, data teams query telemetry data with SQL or analyze it with machine learning models to identify outliers and predict issues.

“Instead of creating a dashboard for every 50 or 100 databases, you can actually look at the chart to understand if something has misbehaved,” Xin explained. “Database management will look very similar to an analytics problem. You look at outliers, you look at trends, you try to understand why things happen. This is how you manage at scale when agents are creating and destroying databases programmatically.”

The implications extend to autonomous agents themselves. An AI agent experiencing performance issues could query the telemetry data to diagnose problems — treating database operations as just another analytics task rather than requiring specialized DBA knowledge. Database management becomes something agents can do for themselves using the same data analysis capabilities they already have.

What this means for enterprise data teams

The Lakebase construct signals a fundamental shift in how enterprises should think about operational databases — not as precious, carefully managed infrastructure requiring specialized DBAs, but as ephemeral, self-service resources that scale programmatically like cloud compute. 

This matters whether or not autonomous agents materialize as quickly as Databricks envisions, because the underlying architectural principle — treating database management as an analytics problem rather than an operations problem — changes the skill sets and team structures enterprises need.

Data leaders should pay attention to the convergence of operational and analytical data happening across the industry. When writes to an operational database are immediately queryable by analytics engines without ETL, the traditional boundaries between transactional systems and data warehouses blur. This unified architecture reduces the operational overhead of maintaining separate systems, but it also requires rethinking data team structures built around those boundaries.

When lakehouse launched, competitors rejected the concept before eventually adopting it themselves. Xin expects the same trajectory for Lakebase. 

“It just makes sense to separate storage and compute and put all the storage in the lake — it enables so many capabilities and possibilities,” he said.

OnePlus is tipped to deliver a major camera upgrade with its upcoming flagship, the OnePlus 16, expected later in 2026.

According to a new leak, the device will feature a 200MP telephoto sensor measuring 1/1.56 inches, a significant jump from the 50MP 1/2.76-inch telephoto lens found on the OnePlus 15. This change could dramatically improve zoom performance and image detail, while also introducing telephoto macro capabilities for close-up shots.

The leak, shared by @OnePlusClub on X, suggests OnePlus is finally addressing criticism of the OnePlus 15’s scaled-down camera system. That model shipped with smaller sensors and lacked Hasselblad colour tuning, leaving photography enthusiasts underwhelmed despite strong performance elsewhere.

The OnePlus 16’s rumoured telephoto upgrade would put it in line with rivals such as Oppo’s Find X9 series, which already offers telephoto macro functionality. 

Strong leadership is essential for IEEE to advance technology for humanity. The organization depends on the dedicated service of its volunteers to advance its mission.

Each year, the Nominations and Appointments (N&A) Committee is responsible for recommending candidates to the Board of Directors and the IEEE Assembly for volunteer leadership positions, including president-elect, corporate officers, committee chairs, and committee members. See below for the complete list.

By nominating qualified, experienced, committed volunteers, you help ensure continuity, good governance, and thoughtful decision-making at the highest levels of the organization. We encourage nominators to take a deliberate approach and align nominations with each candidate’s demonstrated experience and the specific qualifications of the role.

To nominate a person for a position, complete this form.

The N&A Committee is currently seeking nominees for the following positions:

2028 IEEE President-Elect (who will be elected in 2027 and will serve as President in 2029 )

2027 IEEE Corporate Officers

• Secretary
• Treasurer
• Vice President, Educational Activities
• Vice President, Publication Services and Products

2027 IEEE Committees Chairs and Members

• Audit
• Awards Board
• Collaboration and Engagement
• Conduct Review
• Election Oversight
• Employee Benefits and Compensation
• Ethics and Member Conduct
• European Public Policy
• Fellow
• Fellow Nominations and Appointments
• Governance
• History
• Humanitarian Technologies Board
• Industry Engagement
• Innovations (formerly New Initiatives)
• Nominations and Appointments
• Public Visibility
• Tellers

Deadlines for nominations

15 March

• Vice President, Educational Activities
• Vice President, Publication Services and Products
• Committee Chairs

15 June

• President-Elect
• Secretary
• Treasurer
• Committee Members

Deadlines for self-nominations

30 March

• Vice President, Educational Activities
• Vice President, Publication Services and Products
• Committee Chairs

30 June

• President-Elect
• Secretary
• Treasurer
• Committee Members

Who can nominate

Anyone may submit a nomination. Self-nominations are encouraged. Nominators need not be IEEE members, but nominees must meet specific qualifications. An IEEE organizational unit may submit recommendations endorsed by its governing body or the body’s designee.

A person may be nominated for more than one position, however nominators are encouraged to focus on positions that align closely with the candidate’s qualifications and experience. Nominators need not contact their nominees before submitting the form. The IEEE N&A committee will contact eligible nominees for the required documentation and for their interest and willingness to be considered for the position.

How to nominate

For information about the positions, including qualifications, estimates of the time required by each position during the term of office, and the nomination process check the IEEE Nominations and Appointments Committee website. To nominate a person for a position, complete this form.

Nominating tips

Make sure to check eligibility requirements on the N&A committee website before submitting a nomination as those that do not meet the stated requirements will not be advanced.

Volunteers with relevant prior experience in lower-level IEEE committees and units are recommended by the committee more often than volunteers without such experience.

Individuals recommended for president-elect and corporate officer positions are more likely to be recommended if they possess a strong track record of leadership, governance experience, and relevant accomplishments within and outside IEEE. Recommended president-elect candidates must have served on the IEEE Board of Directors for at least one year.

Contact nominations@ieee.org with any questions.

Pros

• Thoughtful recipes you won’t find everywhere
• Even the quick recipes felt special
• Extremely fresh ingredients
• Not a lot of plastic waste

Cons

• On the expensive side when you factor in shipping
• Market add-ons are not the best

Meal kits have been around for more than a decade. HelloFresh, Blue Apron, and Home Chef have been the most visible, blasting ads on social media and during your favorite podcast — but are they the best? 

After testing and retesting every meal kit service (here’s how we do it), crafting dozens of these meals-by-mail in our own kitchens, we’ve picked a new favorite for 2026, and it’s not one of the “big three.” 

Advertisement

Marley Spoon offers creative and tasty meals, which may come as no surprise when you learn who the woman behind the recipes is: kitchen maven herself, Martha Stewart.

Marley Spoon caters to adventurous home cooks and food enthusiasts with creative recipes that appeal to both beginners and more refined palates. Unlike some meal kit services that target newcomers with straightforward, quick-prep dishes, Marley Spoon offers more elevated fare featuring Martha’s own recipes. Many come straight from her cookbooks or personal collection, yet they remain accessible — you won’t need advanced techniques or professional training to pull them off.

Read more: Your Guide to Meal Kits: The Essential Tools You’ll Need to Get Started

Curious as we are at CNET about all things meal kits, we wanted to know just how good they are — and whether they’re worth the money. We tested a week’s worth of recipes for a third time to bring you this review of Marley Spoon’s meal kit delivery service.

How Marley Spoon works

Marley Spoon operates similarly to most others in the category and offers both meal kits with recipes that you cook and prepared meals that only require reheating.

After choosing between those two options, you will then answer the question, “What kid of meals do you like?” Meal kit options include everyday variety, low calorie, low carb, quick and easy, vegetarian, pescatarian and Mediterranean for two or four people and you can choose between two and six meals per week. The single-serving prepared meal options include everyday variety, low calorie or low carb and you can choose 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 or 18 meals per week.

Your box of meal kit ingredients is delivered once a week — unless you skip a week, which is easy to do — and you can either manually select recipes or let Martha Stewart personally choose them for you. OK, just kidding: She’s not your personal meal concierge, but you can let the brand select meals if you prefer a little mystery. You can select any day of the week for delivery, and the boxes will arrive between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. 

There are now more than 100 recipes each week, ranging in difficulty. Before you choose a recipe for delivery, you’ll see all the steps involved, the estimated time it takes to complete, and detailed nutritional information to help you decide.  

Prepared meals are $12.99 each and shipping is $10.99 per box.

What are Martha Stewart & Marley Spoon meals like

As you might imagine, since Martha Stewart helped design the concept and created many of the recipes, there are some really interesting, high-end and gourmet dishes to choose from. Luckily, though, most are still fairly simple to make.

There are plenty of healthy recipes, along with dietary preferences to choose from. However, there are only between four and six vegan options each week so if you want more options, Purple Carrot may be a better choice for you. Other services that feature built-in diet meal plans include Green Chef, Home Chef or HelloFresh.

At Marley Spoon, you’ll find plenty of warming comfort dishes like French onion chicken breast and beef stroganoff, plus desserts you can add on to your box, such as baked gingerbread doughnuts and French-style cheesecake.

On the prepared-meal side, the recipes are just as creative. Some meals include tilapia with smoky tomato sauce and black bean street corn and merlot chicken meatballs with orzo pasta and green beans.

How easy are Martha Stewart & Marley Spoon meals to prepare?

Our meals ran the gamut from the super simple to a bit more complicated and time-intensive, but the good news is that it’s really up to you on how difficult you want the meals to be when you make your recipe selections.

The skillet chicken Parmesan, for instance, had a number of steps like preparing the chicken, cooking it, making the sauce and preparing the pasta (which had its own ingredients). For someone with a decent amount of cooking experience, this isn’t challenging, but some beginners might not be ready for such an involved meal. Other meals, such as the butternut squash pizza, were quite simple, tasty, and perfect for a weeknight when you don’t feel like fussing much or taking time to cook.  

Read more: Meal Kits Taught Me How to Cook. Now I Get to Test Them for a Living

What we cooked and how it went

Beef picadillo pockets with bell peppers and cilantro chimichurri: This meal was not only delicious but also fun to make. It was the first time I used raw dough in a meal kit recipe, and the results were well worth the effort. Although the empanadas were filling, I still would have liked it to have come with a side other than the chimichurri sauce.

Butternut squash pizza with ricotta, almonds and hot honey: I had never had butternut squash on a pizza before this meal, but I can definitely see myself making this again. It was a perfect fall meal with the onions, squash, rosemary and almonds added on top.

Seared salmon and citrus butter sauce with smashed potatoes and shaved Brussels salad: The Brussels sprout salad helped elevate this simple meal and take it to the next level. I cooked the salmon on the stovetop and the smashed potatoes in my air fryer.

Skillet chicken Parmesan with casarecce and sautéed spinach: This recipe was good and very comforting, though it certainly had a healthy share of carbs and calories. The red sauce was very simple and the chicken cutlets weren’t breaded so it felt a little healthier than normal chicken Parm but not quite enough to be really, truly healthy. I had lots of leftovers, which was nice. 

Honey miso salmon with roasted carrots and Brussels sprouts: This one was great and healthy, but it wasn’t particularly out-of-the-box. The salmon was high-quality and tasted super fresh.

Restorative chicken soup with sweet potato kale and quinoa: A very tasty and hearty soup I made and ate all week. The shredded chicken was already cooked, which surprised me but I appreciated, as it was still moist and flavorful. This entire meal was simple to prepare and felt like nourishing medicine, thanks to all those superfoods. 

Marley Spoon support materials 

I found the recipes clear, concise and easy to follow. There’s some nice background on the ingredients, too: my salmon recipe, for instance, provided context on miso for anyone unfamiliar with the fermented paste. The Marley Spoon app is also helpful with lots of information about each recipe and gives you the ability to order, pause, cancel or skip a week right from your mobile device. 

What makes Marley Spoon different from other meal kit services?

One thing to like about this service is it doesn’t try to be anything other than good. There’s no pandering to fad diets or giving users too much autonomy to change recipes or swap out meats. The meal kit service’s proposition is that the culinary team has come up with thoughtful, mostly healthy recipes they think you’ll enjoy — and they ask you to put your trust in them. I wouldn’t go so far as to call it stuffy or stubborn, but there is something very Martha Stewart about it. 

In that respect, it reminds me a bit of Sunbasket. That meal kit service also tries to keep the integrity of the original recipes they’ve created and while it might not please everyone, I think it pays off in the end for those who appreciate good food.

Who is Marley Spoon good for?

This is one of the best meal kit services for foodies and experienced cooks looking to shake up their weeknight dinner rotation. If you’re looking for interesting new recipes that are both gourmet and approachable, Martha Stewart’s meal kits are a good pick. It’s also a solid choice for a home cook who’s looking to hone new skills or work with new ingredients. 

A lot of the recipes are kid-friendly, so these meal kits would also work well for families of up to four people. And with as many as seven plant-based recipes each week, this is a good meal kit service for vegans, vegetarians or those trying to sprinkle in a few more non-meat dinners per week.

Who is Martha Stewart & Marley Spoon not good for?

If you’re an extremely picky eater, a very new cook, or are trying to keep a gluten-free diet, I would not suggest this meal kit. It’s also not a good meal delivery service if you’re simply looking to get dinner on the table each week and don’t care about the cooking process, since some of the recipes are involved.

Packaging and environmental friendliness 

I found Martha Stewart & Marley Spoon to be on the eco-friendly side of the meal kit spectrum. There was some single-use plastic waste, as there always is, but nothing excessive — and the ingredients were not individually packed in disposable bags as of 2025. The boxes, coolers and ice packs were also recyclable.

Changing, skipping or canceling your meal kit order

Between the website and mobile app, Marley Spoon makes it very easy to skip weeks, change out recipes or pause your subscription. Any changes must be made six days prior to the delivery date.

The final verdict on Martha Stewart & Marley Spoon

Being a Martha Stewart-conceived meal kit project, I had lofty expectations for this service and it mostly met them. When I flip through the menu each week, it boasts one of the highest percentages of recipes that make me go “ooh, that sounds good” right up there with Sunbasket. Most importantly, all the recipes we made delivered on the promise of a tasty and interesting meal. There wasn’t much blah factor, and we very much appreciate that.

The meal kit service also includes some thoughtful touches that others don’t, like quick ingredient explainers for new chefs and different chefs behind some of the recipes. The produce, meats and fish were also some of the freshest we’d received from a meal kit service and that goes a long way in creating a truly delicious dinner. The pricing is fair for what you get, and if you’re cooking for a large group, it actually gets rather affordable per serving. The market add-ons have also grown over the years.

If you’ve been wanting to try a meal kit service with a range of healthy, hearty and comforting meals and you already have the cooking basics down, I’d say give Martha’s meals a whirl. 

Stepping into VR is about more than strapping on a headset and loading a game. The best VR headsets today are gateways to fully realized experiences, whether that’s gaming, fitness, creative work or simply spending time inside a richly rendered virtual world. As the hardware has improved, so has the sense of presence, with sharper displays, wider fields of view and tracking systems that make movement feel more natural and responsive. The result is VR that feels less like a novelty and more like a platform you can actually spend time in.

That said, not every headset is built for the same function. Some prioritize ease of use and standalone play, while others demand a powerful PC in exchange for higher fidelity. Compatibility also matters more than ever, especially as VR begins to overlap with mixed reality and early smart glasses experiments. Whether you want a simple way to explore virtual spaces or a high-end rig that pushes immersion as far as possible, this guide breaks down the best VR headsets you can buy in 2026 and explains who each one is really for.

Table of contents

Best VR headsets for 2026

Photo by Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

Read our full Meta Quest 3 VR headset review

Advertisement

Storage capacity: 128GB | Battery life: 2.2 hours | Field of view: 110 degrees (horizontal), 96 degrees (vertical) | Max refresh rate: 120Hz

The long-awaited follow-up to the Quest 2 is an upgrade in every respect: It’s more comfortable to wear, it has higher quality screens and it has full-color mixed reality cameras, allowing you to see the real world alongside virtual elements. While it’s more expensive at $500, it’s also a far more capable headset than the Quest 2 and the new Quest 3S, with hardware and optics that will keep you happily immersed in VR for years.

The Quest 3 is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chip, which Meta says has double the graphics power of the Quest 2. That additional power is noticeable in games like Red Matter 2, which feature updated textures that deliver an experience closer to PC VR. The Quest 3’s new displays run at 2,064 by 2,208 pixels per eye, offering an even better experience than the PlayStation VR2. Its mixed reality cameras also let you easily see the real world, in case you need to quickly answer a text or Slack message. And they enable games that can be built around your room.

What makes the Quest 3 interesting is that it offers more than just solid VR: It also gives you a glimpse at what a mixed reality future could be, blurring the line between the real world and a virtual world. While it’s not as sharp or capable as Apple’s Vision Pro, that’s understandable. And just like previous Quest headsets, you can also plug it into a gaming PC for higher quality VR experiences, expanding its compatibility beyond standalone use.

Advertisement

Pros

• Sharp new screens and lenses
• Faster performance
• Mixed reality cameras make it easier to see the real world
• Adjustable for glasses

Cons

• More expensive than before
• Only 128GB of storage to start
• No battery life improvements

Devindra Hardawar for Engadget

Read our full Apple Vision Pro M5 review

Advertisement

Storage capacity: Up to 1TB | Battery life: 2.5 hours | Field of view: 100 degrees | Max refresh rate: 120Hz

Apple’s first update for the Vision Pro is basically just a spec bump, but it’s at least a sign that the company hasn’t forgotten about its whole spatial computing endeavour. It’s faster and more power efficient, thanks to the M5 chip, and it also ships with a more comfortable Dual Knit Band that does a better job of balancing such a heavy headset.

With its additional power, the M5 Vision Pro can render 10 percent more pixels than the original model, and it can reach up to a faster 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. I couldn’t see a major difference in our testing, but I can confirm its Micro OLED screens still look phenomenal. They’re crisp enough for reading text on websites and a mirrored Mac, plus can also scale to extreme heights for stunning Immersive Video content.

Given its high $3,500 price and limited content, though, the Vision Pro is still clearly not meant for typical consumers, with its primary function leaning more toward development and experimentation than everyday VR use. Instead, like the original, it’s basically just a highly polished developer kit for people interested in building visionOS apps. Apple diehards will likely get a kick out of it too, but practically most people interested in AR and VR are better off buying a Meta Quest 3 alongside a gaming PC, especially as lighter smart glasses concepts continue to evolve separately from full headsets.

Advertisement

Pros

• Faster M5 chip
• Excellent displays
• Hand and eye tracking work well
• Support for PS VR2 controllers

Cons

• Expensive
• Limited immersive video and apps
• Relatively heavy

Photo by Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

Read our full Meta Quest 3S VR headset review

Advertisement

Storage capacity: 128GB, 256GB | Battery life: 2-3 hours | Field of view: 96 degrees | Max refresh rate: 120Hz

The Quest 3S is Meta’s latest entry-level VR headset, but don’t let its reasonable $300 price fool you: It’s also a remarkable achievement for the company. It sports the same Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chip as the Quest 3, as well as a healthy 8GB of RAM, allowing it to power the same experiences as its pricier sibling. It also features Meta’s excellent Touch Plus controllers, which deliver solid motion controls, as well as responsive joysticks and buttons.

The only major downside is that the Quest 3S isn’t nearly as sharp as the Quest 3. It features the same 1,830 by 1,920 pixel per eye screen from the Quest 2, while the Quest 3’s screen offers 30 percent more pixels (2,264 by 2,208 pixels per eye), to deliver a sharper and more realistic image.

VR newbies probably won’t notice the difference much though, and that’s what really matters. The Quest 3S is just as comfortable as the Quest 3 to wear, and it can easily access the same apps and games on the Meta Quest Store. There’s no headphone jack either, but its built-in speakers deliver solid enveloping audio for games like Maestro, and you could also plug in a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter, or just pair wireless headphones.

Advertisement

The Quest 3S can connect to gaming PCs over USB-C or wirelessly to play more intense VR experiences, giving it strong compatibility with both standalone and PC-based setups. It can also wirelessly stream your gameplay to Chromecast devices, or to AirPlay devices by mirroring the Quest app from an iPhone. If you’re still holding onto the Quest 2, or an original Quest, the Quest 3S is precisely the inexpensive upgrade you’ve been waiting for.

Pros

• Fast performance
• Comfortable to wear
• Excellent controllers
• Large app library

Cons

• Older Fresnel lenses lead to artifacts
• No headphone jack
• Average mixed reality cameras

Photo By Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

Advertisement

Read our full PlayStation VR2 headset review

Storage capacity: 128GB, 256GB | Battery life: 3 hours | Field of view: 110 degrees | Max refresh rate: 120Hz

The PS VR2 is one of the best headset we’ve tested. It offers dual 2K OLED HDR screens, effectively giving you 4K quality. It’s one of the most comfortable headsets around. And it has some genuinely refreshing new features, like eye tracking and headset haptics. (Yes, it can literally rock your noggin.) Best of all, the PS VR2 delivers high-quality virtual reality without the need for a $1,000+ gaming PC – all you need is a PlayStation 5, making its core function tightly focused on console gaming.

Now, our recommendation comes with a few caveats. At $550, the PS VR2 is more expensive than the PS5 itself. And it’s unclear how quickly its game library will fill up. The initial run has only a few exclusives, like Horizon VR and Gran Turismo 7, and we haven’t seen many new titles since then. But it’s still the easiest way to experience high-end VR, and it’s a major upgrade over the original PS VR.

Advertisement

Pros

• Excellent OLED displays
• Comfortable fit
• Headset haptics feel immersive
• Sense controllers are solid

Cons

• Incredibly high launch price
• Limited new titles
• Long term development is suspect

Photo by Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

Read our full Valve Index VR kit review

Advertisement

Storage capacity: N/A | Battery life: 7 hours | Field of view: 108 degrees | Max refresh rate: 120Hz

Valve’s Index kit remains one of the best high-end solutions on the market that provides a truly immersive VR experience. For $999 you get the Index headset, Valve’s finger tracking controllers and two SteamVR base stations. While we’ve seen higher-resolution headsets arrive in the last two years, it’s still a very solid option, with a 1,440 by 1,600 pixel resolution, an eye-watering 144Hz refresh rate and a massive 130-degree field of view. I’d gladly lose a few pixels for the Index’s smoother and more expansive screen, which are still far beyond most other consumer headsets.

As a SteamVR product, the Index requires installing two sensors at opposite corners of your room, which limits its compatibility but enables extremely precise tracking. And of course, it’s wired to your PC. But that clunkiness is worth it for the higher refresh rate and more accurate tracking, especially if you want the deepest possible sense of immersion in a virtual world. Sure, it’s not as easy to use as the Quest 3S, but at this price range, we assume you’ll suffer a bit of inconvenience to get a truly high-quality VR experience.

Valve’s finger tracking controllers are fantastic as well, with a convenient strap that locks them onto your hands. They make playing Half-Life: Alyx feel like a dream. It’s unfortunate that other VR games haven’t fully taken advantage of the finger tracking though.

Advertisement

Pros

• 144Hz refresh rate with a 130-degree field of view
• Excellent finger-tracking controllers
• Stellar performance

Cons

• Requires installing sensors in your room
• Wired design

Photo by Devindra Hardawar / Engadget

Read our full Bigscreen Beyond VR headset review

Advertisement

Storage capacity: N/A | Battery life: 2 hours | Field of view: 102 degrees | Max refresh rate: 90Hz

Essentially an upgrade for the Index, the Beyond is a unique spin on a VR headset from Bigscreen, with a function that prioritizes comfort and visual fidelity over convenience, the developer of a popular app for watching video in VR. It looks more like an oversized pair of goggles than a massive VR headset. The $999 Beyond is the lightest VR option we’ve ever seen (it weighs a tad more than a deck of playing cards), and its Micro-OLED screens are sharp and offer near-perfect contrast. Unlike LCD screens, black can look genuinely black with the Beyond.

The downside, though, is that the Bigscreen Beyond is expensive. It’s $999 on its own if you’re just upgrading a Valve Index setup. If you’re starting from scratch, though, you’ll also need to buy two Steam VR base stations and a pair of Index controllers. That adds up to a whopping $1,578.

The Bigscreen Beyond also requires a custom face cushion, which is built from a 3D facescan when you place your order. Unfortunately, that makes it harder to share than other headsets. There’s also no room for glasses, since it’s so slim. You can buy prescription lens inserts from Bigscreen for an additional fee. And of course, you’ll have to live with a cable tethered to your PC, there’s none of the freedom of the cordless Meta Quest headsets.

Advertisement

For all of its complexity, though, the Bigscreen Beyond delivers the most immersive PC VR experience I’ve ever seen. Since it’s so light, you can easily wear it for hours. Together with its glorious screens, it’s the best option for VR enthusiasts who don’t mind dealing with cost and complexity for true immersion.

Pros

• Incredibly light and comfortable
• Sharp and bright Micro-OLED screens
• Works alongside existing Valve Index accessories

Cons

• Expensive
• No built-in audio
• Still exhibits artifacting like other VR headsets

How we test VR headsets

I tend to judge candidates for the best VR headset on a few basic criteria: Ergonomics, immersion and controls. It’s not that hard to shove a mobile display into a plastic headset and strap some cheap elastic headbands onto it. But it takes real design skill to craft something that’s well balanced, includes a supportive headstrap, and doesn’t feel uncomfortable after 30 minutes.

My test for ergonomics is fairly simple: How long can I wear a headset until I start to feel discomfort? For the most ergonomic devices, like the Quest 3, that could easily be an hour or two. But heavier PC hardware often feels cumbersome after just 15 minutes — you won’t find those kinds of devices in our list of the best VR headsets.

Immersion, meanwhile, comes from having high resolution screens with fast refresh rates, like a 120Hz refresh rate, helping users feel fully present inside a virtual world. Field of view is also a major element, as it describes how well VR screens can cover what you see. A narrow FOV makes it feel like you’re peering through a pair of binoculars, which limits your sense of “presence.” The best VR headsets aim for a wider field of view, helping virtual environments feel more natural and fully surround you.

A wide field of view, on the other hand, can make it seem like you’re actually flying over the globe in Google Earth. We look at a few popular video games, like Superhot, Beat Saber and Pistol Whip, on every headset to judge how immersed we feel and how enjoyable the gaming experience is overall.

The best controllers fit naturally in your hands and offer accurate tracking. The industry has basically adopted the design of Meta’s excellent touch controllers, but we’re also seeing intriguing leaps forward like Valve’s finger tracking gamepads. We judge controllers based on how easy they are to hold, how they hold up to sweaty gameplay sessions and how easily headsets can track their position in space.

However, it’s important to look at a virtual reality headset’s specs as a whole, including compatibility with your existing hardware and the kind of experiences you plan to use it for. Depending on what you’re looking for in yourVR headset, you’ll want to consider factors like your PC’s CPU and graphics card if you plan to use the headset to play the best VR games. You might not need a super powerful PC, but you should check the minimum requirements for the headset you’re looking to purchase. If you’re not looking to invest in a VR headset solely for gaming, features like head tracking allow you to explore your environment just by simply moving your head in the simulator. This often results in a more immersive and realistic experience.

Other VR headsets we’ve tested

HTC Vive Focus Vision

The Vive Focus Vision is a sleek premium standalone VR headset that can also deliver solid PC VR. But it’s also running aging hardware, it’s riddled with software issues and it’s expensive compared to the Meta Quest 3.

Meta Quest Pro

As great as the Meta Quest 3 is, the Quest 2 is still a very good entry-level VR headset, and it’s worth considering if it’s on sale below its current $250 list price. The Meta Quest Pro, on the the hand, is an expensive boondoggle best ignored.

HTC Vive Pro 2

Outside of Meta’s hardware, the HTC Vive Pro 2 remains a fantastic PC headset, but it’s far more expensive than the Valve Index, which is more comfortable and offers better audio.

VR headset FAQs

How do VR headsets work?

At the most basic level, a VR headset is simply a high quality screen that you’re holding up to your face. For a wired headset, the actual work of rendering a game is done on either a PC or game console. For completely wireless devices, like the Meta Quest 3, that work is handled right on the headset. They rely on either external sensors, or sensors built into the headsets, to map your physical space. While you can use a traditional gamepad or keyboard and mouse in VR, they typically use motion tracking controllers to immerse you in their 3D environments.

What VR headset is best for full body tracking?

While we’re still waiting for a truly great haptic VR bodysuit to arrive, you can still achieve accurate body tracking with most Steam VR-compatible PC headsets. The Valve Index and HTC Vive Pro 2 both rely on room-tracking sensors that can map your body more effectively than the built-in sensors on competitors. You can also add HTC Vive Trackers to wrist and leg straps, as well as belts, for even better coverage. The Meta Quest 3 doesn’t have any easy body tracking solutions, but you can add Vive trackers when it’s plugged into your PC to mimic a Steam VR headset.

Only a few experiences, like VRChat, take advantage of full body tracking at the moment. Currently there aren’t any body tracking solutions for the PlayStation VR and VR2, but we’re intrigued by the company’s Mocopi body trackers, which were really announced in Japan.

What VR headsets are better than Oculus?

Oculus is the previous name for Meta’s VR hardware. Currently, Meta only supports the Quest 3, Quest 3S and Quest Pro, all of which are wireless headsets. As we explain above, PC VR headsets can generally achieve better quality virtual reality, since they rely on more powerful graphics hardware.

What VR headsets work with Xbox?

Currently, Microsoft’s Xbox consoles don’t support any VR headsets.

Recent updates

November 2025: Updated to include the Apple Vision Pro M5.

April 2025: Updated to include review scores for our top picks, where applicable.

November 2024: Added the HTC Vive Focus Vision to the “others we tested” section.

October 2024: Updated our “best cheap VR headset” top pick to be the Meta Quest 3S.

Xbox Cloud Gaming is one of the key selling points of Xbox Game Pass, and it generally works well. The service lets gamers stream Xbox titles to a wide range of devices, including phones, tablets, handhelds and select smart TVs from Samsung, LG and Hisense. However, following the Xbox Game Pass price increase from November, streaming alone may not be enough to keep some subscribers on board, which is where an ad-supported tier could come into play.

Microsoft confirmed the existence of an ad-supported tier last year but has not shared details on when it will launch or what it will include. New screenshots shared by players suggest the tier may be arriving soon, though questions remain about how it will work and what limitations it may have.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

When will the Xbox Cloud Gaming ad-supported tier launch? 

Microsoft hasn’t made an official announcement yet, but it’s expected to roll out sometime this year, according to Windows Central. Last month, some gamers saw a different loading screen for Xbox Cloud Gaming with a message saying “1 hour of ad-supported play time per session,” which would point to the ads coming soon. 

How much will the Xbox Cloud Gaming ad-supported tier cost? 

In October, Microsoft confirmed it was internally testing the ad-supported tier, and at the time, said it would be free. Going by the load screen message I mentioned earlier, there will likely be a limit on how long people can play on the tier and during internal testing, players would have to watch a 2-minute ad. 

What games will be available on the ad-supported tier? 

Rumors about the internal testing suggested players would only have access to certain games for free, but the question is, which ones? Microsoft has a significant number of games available to stream, whether it’s purchased digital games or those available with an Xbox Game Pass subscription. Microsoft may allow all the digital games in a player’s library to be streamed and might make a few games available for free on a weekly or monthly basis, similar to the Free Play Days games. 

ARCAM is pushing the Radia Series beyond two-channel and straight into serious home theater territory. At ISE 2026 in Barcelona, the brand will debut its new Radia AV lineup—AVA15, AVA25, AVA35, and the AVP45 sixteen-channel AV processor, along with PA4 and PA9 power amplifiers.

The three new AVA models are essentially A/V receivers. However, because they do not include traditional AM/FM radio tuners, ARCAM has chosen to label them AVA (Audio/Video Amplifiers) rather than AVR (Audio/Video Receivers). AVP, meanwhile, stands for Audio/Video Preamp or Processor, a term commonly used to describe surround processors that require external power amplification.

The new lineup replaces the AVR11, AVR21, AVR31, and AV41 models introduced in 2022, delivering a full design refresh that brings ARCAM’s home theater components into visual alignment with the existing Radia Series hi-fi models. More importantly, the new AVA and AVP models add support for Dirac Live Active Room Treatment (Dirac ART), a notable step forward over the previous generation, which was limited to Dirac Live and Dirac Bass Control room correction upgrades.

The move positions ARCAM’s new AV components as fully modern cinema hubs, combining Dirac Live room correction with optional Dirac Live Bass Control and Dirac Live Active Room Treatment (ART) upgrades to actively manage low-frequency resonances and reflections. The result is tighter, more controlled bass, improved dialogue clarity, and a wider, more consistent sweet spot—even in asymmetrical or acoustically challenging rooms where traditional correction methods start to show their limits.

What the ARCAM AVA & AVP Models Share

• Dirac: Dirac Live Room Correction is standard, with optional upgrades for Dirac Live Bass Control and Dirac Live Active Room Treatment (ART).
• Dolby Atmos: Industry-standard immersive surround sound support.
• DTS:X: Immersive surround format offering more flexible speaker layout options than Dolby Atmos.
• Remote Control: Included Bluetooth remote operates without line-of-sight requirements.
• App Control: AVA and AVP models work with the ARCAM Radia app for setup, control, Internet Radio, podcasts, and UPnP playback on iOS, Android, and Windows PCs.
• Streaming Support: Apple AirPlay, Google Cast, Spotify Connect, TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, and Roon support are all included, enabling direct streaming from lossless music services on Apple and Android devices.
• Bluetooth Support: Built-in Bluetooth with Snapdragon Sound and Auracast support.
• Front Panel Display: Large, high-resolution front-panel display provides clear system status and metadata visibility from the listening position.
• Form Factor: The AVA15, AVA25, AVA35, and AVP45 all share the same chassis dimensions.

What’s New?

The biggest changes over the previous generation of ARCAM AVRs are the new Radia Series design, added support for Dirac Live Active Room Treatment (ART), and an increase from seven to nine built-in amplified channels. These upgrades, however, come with a notable price increase, and both Dirac Live Bass Control and Dirac Live Active Room Treatment remain paid upgrades rather than standard features.

AVA15 

This AVA15 sits in the entry-level position within ARCAM’s lineup, but the feature set is anything but basic. It delivers nine channels of built-in Class D amplification, with the ability to expand to twelve channels through the use of external power amplifiers. This enables 7.1.2 or 5.1.4 speaker configurations using onboard amplification alone, while adding external amplification opens the door to 9.1.2 layouts. Additional system flexibility is available through configurable speaker assignments for extra subwoofers, height, or surround channels. For users seeking flexible Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support without jumping to a full separates setup, the AVA15 covers a lot of ground.

AVA25

The AVA25 steps things up with more robust amplification and enhanced audio decoding and processing, featuring nine channels of built-in Class A/B amplification rated at 100 watts per channel for greater control in larger rooms or with more demanding loudspeakers. In addition to Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support, it adds Auro-3D surround sound, includes a Zone 2 output for multi-room configurations, and employs a toroidal linear power supply to deliver stable, consistent power under load.

AVA35

The top-of-the-line AVA35 also delivers nine channels of built-in amplification but moves to Class G topology, which ARCAM claims offers roughly twice the efficiency of the AVA25’s Class A/B design. According to ARCAM, this results in more controlled, precise performance with greater consistency across the full dynamic range. The AVA35 also benefits from an upgraded DAC architecture borrowed from the Radia Series hi-fi lineup, positioning it as the strongest option of the three for two-channel music listening as well as home cinema duties.

AVP45

For those who prefer a separates-based approach, the ARCAM AVP45 is designed to serve as the central hub of a home cinema system, offering sixteen unamplified channels of decoding with support for Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, Auro-3D, and IMAX Enhanced. Balanced outputs ensure a clean signal path, while Matrix Channel Assignment enables flexible speaker configurations and includes Zone 2 output for multi-room integration.

As a preamp/processor, the AVP45 requires external power amplification to deliver sound, but that flexibility allows users to choose amplification that best matches their speakers and listening priorities.

PA4

Housed in a slimline 1U chassis, the PA4 power amplifier provides four channels of Class D amplification. It can be paired with any multi-channel preamp/processor but is specifically designed to expand ARCAM Radia AV systems. The PA4 can be used to add additional channels to the AVA15, AVA25, and AVA35, or to offload the most demanding power requirements to the front main channels in a home theater setup.

PA9

Designed to partner with the AVP45 processor, the PA9 provides nine channels of Class D amplification, delivering controlled, effortless power across all channels. Built for high-channel-count immersive systems, the PA9 allows Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and Auro-3D setups to perform at their best when paired with a dedicated processor-based configuration.

Comparison

The Competition

There’s no avoiding the fact that the new Radia Home Theater lineup is expensive, with pricing ranging from $4,500 to $7,000. That said, it’s largely in line with competing high-end options, including Denon’s $5,200 AVR-A10H and $7,200 AVR-A1H, as well as the $4,700 Marantz Cinema 30. On the AV preamp/processor side, the AVP45 faces direct competition from Marantz’s $8,000 AV10, $6,000 AV20, and $4,000 AV30.

The Bottom Line

ARCAM’s decision to bring Dirac Live Active Room Treatment to the Radia AV lineup is the defining upgrade. This is not a checkbox feature or marketing noise—it’s a real performance tool that elevates the AVA15, AVA25, AVA35, and AVP45 into serious home cinema territory for listeners who understand that the room is part of the system. What’s new is substantial: the Radia design language, higher channel counts, optional Dirac ART, Bluetooth with Snapdragon Sound and Auracast, HDR10+ Gaming support, and streamlined setup and control via the Radia Control app. What’s missing is equally clear: there’s no AM/FM radio tuner, and Dirac’s advanced processing options remain paid upgrades.

This lineup is aimed at buyers moving beyond mass-market AVRs—people building modern, immersive systems who care about bass control, timing, and consistency across multiple seats, not just a single sweet spot. With the simultaneous launch of the new ARCAM Radia Series loudspeakers at ISE 2026, ARCAM is making a coordinated push into high-performance home theater, offering a complete ecosystem designed for listeners who expect precision, not compromises.

Pricing & Availability

The ARCAM Radia AVA and AVP models will be available from authorized ARCAM dealers from Q3 2026. The PA amplifiers are scheduled for Q4 2026.

• ARCAM Radia AVA15: £2,599 / €2,999 / $4,499.95 
• ARCAM Radia AVA25: £4,499 / €4,999 / $5,499.95 
• ARCAM Radia AVA35: £5,999 / €6,999 / $6,999.95  
• ARCAM Radia AVP45: £5,299 / €5,999 / $5,999.95
• ARCAM Radia PA4: £899 / €999 / $1,499.95
• ARCAM Radia PA9: £3,499 / €3,999 / $4,999.95  

Related Reading:

from the incentives-are-everything dept

For years, we watched Silicon Valley executives perform elaborate corporate theater about “values” and “belonging” and “bringing your whole self to work.” If you were skeptical that any of that was real, well, congrats.

Aaron Zamost, a longtime tech communications exec, has a piece in the NY Times that should be required reading for anyone trying to understand the tech industry’s sudden, conspicuous rightward lurch. His argument is refreshingly blunt: this isn’t about ideology. It never was. It’s about leverage.

There are many theories about Silicon Valley’s swift, and very conspicuous, rightward turn. Tech leaders course-corrected from an overly permissive era. The Trump administration demands fealty in exchange for critical regulatory favors. Mr. Trump’s re-election reshaped the national climate and reoriented the values of tech leadership.

Each of these explanations is convenient, but none are correct. I’ve worked in tech for 20 years, across both Big Tech and venture-backed start-ups, and I can tell you the truth is much more mundane. Silicon Valley’s chief executives have always been driven by economics, not ideology. As Michael Corleone put it: It’s not personal — it’s strictly business.

This tracks with everything we’ve observed about how these companies actually operate. The notion that tech CEOs underwent some kind of ideological awakening—either leftward in 2020 or rightward in 2024—always gave them way too much credit for having coherent beliefs about anything other than what would help them with Wall Street in the long run.

What actually happened? This is where my undergrad degree in labor relations actually comes in handy: because, as Aaron notes: labor economics happened. When you’re in a vicious war for talent and engineers have infinite options, you do whatever it takes to keep them happy. And if that means mental health stipends and letting employees “bring their whole selves to work,” then that’s what you do. Not because you believe in it. Because replacing a top engineer costs a fortune.

Big tech companies and growing start-ups are in constant, vicious competition with one another to hire and retain the best employees, especially in product and engineering roles. When these companies are in hypergrowth mode, and particularly when the job market is tight, hiring top talent can be nothing short of a matter of survival. And they are fishing in a largely progressive pond: Political donation data shows tech employees are predominantly Democratic-leaning.

The late 2010s and early 2020s were a particularly intense period in the industry’s war for talent. Hiring exploded. Meta nearly doubled to 86,000 employees in 2022 from approximately 45,000 three years earlier. Amazon added over 400,000 employees in 2020 alone. As Silicon Valley recruiting teams relentlessly poached one another’s people, tech labor had infinite choices and all the leverage.

So what did companies do when a generous compensation package was no longer enough to win over candidates? They instead sold a sense of belonging. Amid fierce competition, many companies realized that encouraging workers to bring their perspectives and passions to the office could increase their loyalty and their willingness to work hard. That, in turn, served the real financial objective: higher job acceptance rates, lower employee attrition and faster growth.

So when tech companies said all those nice things about diversity and belonging and employee voice, it was merely a calculated business decision to attract and retain workers in a brutally competitive labor market. The “whole self” culture wasn’t a political movement. It was, as Zamost puts it, “a labor-market artifact where talent war conditions made employee empowerment economically rational.”

And then the market shifted.

Growth slowed. Interest rates rose. Suddenly companies didn’t need to compete for labor at any cost. And the moment that leverage flipped back to management, all those “values” evaporated faster than you can say “return to office mandate.”

It’s worth asking whether many tech companies’ professed values were ever real. We’ve seen leaders who built their reputations on defying authority become foot soldiers for the administration. The same elasticity informs their rollback of the culture they once championed.

Four years ago, Marc Benioff, the Salesforce boss, said, “Office mandates are never going to work.” He now works from home in Hawaii much of the time while most of his employees are required to be in-office three to five days a week. In 2020, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook would donate $10 million to groups working on racial justice. Last year he rolled back Meta’s D.E.I. programs. Did his values change? Or did the power dynamics?

The answer, obviously, is the power dynamics. And this isn’t a particularly controversial thing to say. The thing that gets lost in all the discourse about tech’s “MAGA turn” is how utterly banal the explanation actually is. It’s got nothing to do with ideology. These are business actors responding to incentives. When employees had leverage, executives catered to them. When executives got leverage back, they stopped.

Zamost makes an important point that may get buried by the rest of the article though: the response to all this from tech workers hasn’t been outrage. It’s been detachment. And that’s going to boomerang back on these tech leaders.

This about-face will prove counterproductive over the long term. In my conversations with tech employees, the result hasn’t been anger at hypocrisy so much as detachment — a loss of tribal loyalty (fewer T-shirts emblazoned with tech company logos), and a clearer understanding of the limits of corporate idealism.

This is the part that should worry these executives. They’ve revealed the game. They’ve shown that all the talk about values and culture and belonging was contingent on market conditions. And employees noticed. They’re not mad—they’re just not going to forget.

And, yes, the cynical among you will say “come on, no one ever believed these companies were serious” and perhaps that’s true. But there was a time when Silicon Valley employees really liked where they were working and really felt like, as a team, they were achieving stuff.

That’s gone.

Labor markets are cyclical. At some point, these companies will need to compete for talent again. And when they do, they’re going to discover that the employees they’re trying to recruit remember what happened. They remember that the “values” disappeared the moment they became inconvenient. They remember which executives lined up behind Trump. They remember the layoffs and the return-to-office mandates and the sudden silence when it actually mattered.

The recent reassertion of managerial prerogative was only possible in an economic environment where top executives could flex their muscles like a boss. It won’t last forever. When labor is scarce again, many of these companies will rediscover the values they abandoned. The question is whether employees will forget just as quickly.

The optimistic read is that employees won’t forget. That this period will serve as a permanent reminder that corporate values are, at best, marketing. That the next generation of tech workers will enter these companies with clear eyes about what the relationship actually is: transactional.

The pessimistic read is that Zamost is right to pose it as a question. Because companies have been pulling this bait-and-switch for decades, and workers keep falling for it. Maybe the cycle just repeats.

Either way, the lesson isn’t really about politics. It’s about understanding what these companies actually are. They’re not movements. They’re not communities. They’re not families. They’re businesses that will say whatever they need to say to achieve their business objectives. And right now, the (somewhat short-sighted) business objective is staying in the good graces of an administration that has made clear it rewards loyalty and punishes dissent.

So no, they didn’t really want you to bring your whole self to work. They wanted you to bring the parts that were useful to them, for exactly as long as it was useful to them. The “whole self” thing was just the price of admission in a seller’s market. Now that it’s a buyer’s market, they’d prefer you just shut up and (use AI to write) code.

The irony is that employees who actually believe in what they’re building tend to build better things. These executives may have just taught an entire generation of workers that the relationship is purely transactional. When the labor market tightens again—and it will—they might find that lesson stuck.

Filed Under: hiring, labor economics, politics, retention, silicon valley, values