When Dr. Carolina Gutierrez’s physics students used artificial intelligence to solve problems, something unexpected happened: The answers were wrong. But instead of provoking frustration, those mistakes sparked the kind of learning teachers hope for. Students began asking why, adjusting their prompts and developing critical thinking skills that went beyond computational accuracy.
This is the kind of AI integration educators want — not shortcuts, but tools that deepen learning and engage students in authentic problem-solving. As AI becomes increasingly common in classrooms, teachers are moving beyond curiosity and caution to ask practical questions: How do we use these tools responsibly? How do we ensure equity? And how do we help all students benefit?
“We try to move past AI for efficiency,” explained Jessica Garner, senior director of innovative learning at ISTE+ASCD. “That’s a great place to start, but we focus on how AI can help make education what it should be for students — transforming the learning experience.” Garner leads GenerationAI’s Communities of Practice, which bring together educators in yearlong cohorts to explore shared problems of practice around AI. “We intentionally include educators from varied roles, regions and backgrounds — district leaders, administrators, classroom teachers, skeptics, novices and experts,” she said. “Through virtual and in-person convenings, participants learn, test ideas and support one another as they examine how AI can responsibly enhance teaching and learning in their own contexts.”
Recently, EdSurge host Carl Hooker moderated a webinar that brought together members of these communities to highlight practical solutions for implementing AI in K-12 classrooms. The panel included Garner; Dr. Craig Perrier, a high school social studies specialist in Virginia, who uses AI to support new standards and universal design for learning; Hannah Davis Ketteman, a digital learning coach in Texas, who works with teacher cohorts to integrate AI into assignments and assessments; and Gutierrez, a high school science teacher in Houston, who supports emergent bilingual students with AI-guided lessons.
Together, they discussed strategies for building student confidence, scaffolding learning and ensuring all students benefit from innovation.
Advertisement
EdSurge: How do you help teachers who are hesitant about using AI?
Davis Ketteman: As a digital learning coach, a big part of my job is teaching teachers how to use these tools. The spectrum of AI literacy among teachers can be surprising. Empowering teachers will ultimately empower students to become AI literate.
Scaffolding has been really important. People have a lot of opinions about tools like MagicSchool or SchoolAI, but those [simplified platforms with pre-built templates] can be great entry points for teachers who feel uncomfortable or aren’t confident with prompting. If we can give them small successes with tools that feel relevant and practical, they can build confidence and eventually move into larger language models. Starting with a small win helps them expand more easily.
What’s at the heart of your work with your problem of practice?
Advertisement
Perrier: For me, it’s personalization and adaptive learning. In Virginia, students earn verified credits for graduation, often through curriculum-embedded performance assessments based on the Inquiry Design Model.
The challenge is that the materials aren’t always accessible. For example, a primary source for an inquiry on the Crusades included a speech by Pope Urban in Middle English. No ninth grader can read that effectively. So we began using tools like MagicSchool and ChatGPT to modify texts to appropriate reading levels or summarize articles. The problem of practice was: How can we use AI to support the new standards and be emblematic of Universal Design for Learning?
This year, we extended that approach to podcasts and infographics. We used NotebookLM to create podcasts. But then we were surprised by how hard it was to find an AI-based infographic maker. We’d say, “Generate an infographic about the causes of the Civil War,” and the images might look like World War II, or the background language would be nonsense. It just wasn’t a good match for what we needed. We finally landed on Napkin AI through connections in the GenerationAI cohort.
Teachers can now offer a menu of accessible resources so every student can engage meaningfully. It’s shifted the mindset from “My students can’t do this” to “My students absolutely can.”
Gutierrez: For me, it’s about critical thinking and problem-solving, especially in AP Biology. It’s moving students from describing parts to asking: If I change this, what happens?
Advertisement
We use Gizmos, which lets students simulate being vets or doctors and interpret symptoms. I combine that with guided work using AI to generate prompts. For example, when my physics students used AI to solve problems, the answers were sometimes wrong. That led them to ask why and to learn how to adjust prompts or parameters, developing real critical thinking skills.
Hands-on work makes this even more visible. Using AI-generated guides, students followed step-by-step protocols for mini-labs. Breaking complex work into small, manageable steps helped students feel confident and engaged, especially my emergent bilingual learners. They began to participate, understand and stay invested. Quiet students took on leadership roles.
Once students learned how to ask better questions, use prompts effectively and think critically, they became empowered to manage their own learning.
Davis Ketteman: At the core, my work is really about critical thinking and problem-solving. Many teachers are wondering how to navigate a more boxed curriculum while maintaining autonomy. We’ve been talking about evaluating AI output and adapting it for the class.
Advertisement
One teacher I work with teaches math models to seniors. She reworked a budget project where students research a job, find a salary and build a budget. This time, students start by defining what “affordability” means. Then they draw a random life change, like a new roommate or a sick relative, and adjust their budgets. Finally, they present and redefine affordability as a group.
The evaluation this project demands from both teacher and students is astounding. And for students who aren’t strong in math, we focus beyond computation. They analyze what the output means in context. Seeing those light bulbs go off has been amazing.
What advice would you give to educators looking to implement AI?
Gutierrez: First, keep an open mind about the tools you use, what you’ll learn and whose perspective you’re approaching the work from. Are you thinking about the student experience, or are you using it to enhance your lessons?
Learn to pivot when challenges arise. Don’t give up at the first obstacle. AI is a valuable tool, and just as we adapted to computers, it’s becoming part of our classrooms. If we guide students responsibly, they can navigate it safely.
Advertisement
Davis Ketteman: I have two pieces of advice. First, start where you are. AI can feel intimidating, but tools like ChatGPT are still new. Find one small task — maybe cleaning up slides — and try it.
Second, just do it. Opportunities come when you put yourself out there. Apply for webinars or presentations that interest you. Don’t let self-doubt hold you back. Find your people, network and get involved.
Perrier: This falls under self-awareness. You need to be aware and comfortable that you can’t keep up with everything in AI. Some feel they have to be first to know and first to use, but I’m comfortable knowing I can’t do it all.
Stay networked. Find your community, like the one Jessica leads. Being connected opens possibilities instead of constantly chasing them.
Advertisement
Garner: This makes my heart happy. The ways they are working with AI are exactly what we want to see!
Through GenerationAI, ISTE+ASCD and six coalition partners are bringing together a diverse group of educators to examine the impact of generative AI on education and to give educators time and space to consider its use in a safe and responsible way. Join the movement at https://generationai.org to participate in our ongoing exploration of how we can harness AI’s potential to create more engaging, equitable and transformative learning experiences for all students. Sign up here.
YouTube is improving its auto-dubbing feature further to make it easier for viewers to watch videos in languages they actually understand. Auto-dubbing uses AI to translate and replace a video’s spoken audio with a dubbed version in another language.
The feature now supports 27 languages, and viewers can set a preferred language in YouTube’s settings. When a dubbed version is available, YouTube will automatically serve it in the selected language. So if a video exists in another language, YouTube wants it to feel accessible the moment you press play.
YouTube is making auto-dubs sound more natural
YouTube
YouTube says it knows dubbing can feel awkward if it sounds robotic or out of sync. To address this, the company has rolled out Expressive Speech, a feature designed to preserve tone, emotion, and pacing in translated audio.
It is currently available for all YouTube channels in English, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish, with more languages expected later.
The platform is also testing a Lip Sync pilot, which subtly adjusts a speaker’s lip movements to better match the translated audio. This will make dubbed videos feel closer to the original, especially for viewers who find mismatched audio and visuals distracting.
Advertisement
Auto-dubs are generated automatically, but creators are not locked in. They can disable auto-dubbing entirely or upload their own dubbed versions if they prefer more control.
YouTube also uses automatic smart filtering to avoid dubbing content that does not make sense to translate, such as music-only videos or silent vlogs.
However, YouTube acknowledges that auto-dubs can still contain errors, often caused by imperfect speech recognition or unclear audio. The company says these systems will improve over time as more feedback comes in.
Users shouldn’t be afraid of exploring music or letting their kids choose a song, but since Apple Music lacks manual algorithm controls, one wrong song can upend your recommendations for weeks.
Apple Music is great except when you accidentally poison your algorithm
Apple Music is debatably the best option for music streaming, especially for those committed to the Apple ecosystem. However, as great as the app and human curation aspects can be, there is a fatal flaw that requires users to either actively fight it or give up entirely. It seems like it should be obvious to Apple’s development team, but year after year, we have gone without the ability to fine-tune our algorithm. If you dare to listen to a single Christmas song, video game soundtrack, or sleep-focused playlist without first turning off the algorithm altogether, your recommendations will be ruined for an indefinite amount of time. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
How the Apple Vision Pro has and has not moved forward in two years, plus what’s going on with Gemini and Siri, and what comes after the iPhone Fold, on the AppleInsider Podcast.
Apple Vision Pro seemed like the future, but for the present, it’s past its launch halo. And instead eyes are turning to the iPhone Fold and its different forms
It’s a week of looking back, forward, but as it turns out, not suspiciously. For despite reports of Apple and Google making contradictory statements about the tie-up between Siri and Gemini, the truth turns out to be plain and simple — and look fine. But as we wait for the actual results of that deal, there is also the fact that it’s now two entire years since the Apple Vision Pro came out. One of your hosts remains a supporter, but perhaps less of a fan, and wonders what Apple’s plan for the device can be. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Photo-sharing platform Flickr is notifying users of a potential data breach after a vulnerability at a third-party email service provider exposed their real names, email addresses, IP addresses, and account activity.
Founded in 2004, Flickr is one of the world’s largest photography communities and sharing sites, hosting over 28 billion photos and videos. The company says it has 35 million monthly users and 800 million monthly page views.
Flickr did not disclose which third-party provider was involved or how many users were potentially affected by this incident. A Flickr spokesperson was not immediately available for comment when contacted by BleepingComputer earlier today for more details.
The company said that it shut down access to the affected system within hours after being informed of the security flaw on February 5. While the vulnerability “may have” provided access to some member information, Flickr said that passwords and payment card numbers were not compromised in the incident.
“On February 5, 2026, we were alerted to a vulnerability in a system operated by one of our email service providers,” the company said in emails to affected users. “This flaw may have allowed unauthorized access to some Flickr member information. We shut down access to the affected system within hours of learning about it.”
Advertisement
The exposed information includes member names, email addresses, Flickr usernames, account types, IP addresses, general location data, and their activity on the platform.
The company has also encouraged affected users to review their account settings for any unexpected changes and to remain vigilant against phishing emails that may use their Flickr account information, noting that it will never request passwords over email.
Users are also recommended to update their passwords as soon as possible if they use their Flickr credentials on other services.
“We sincerely apologize for this incident and for the concern it may cause,” Flickr added in the emailed notifications.
Advertisement
“We take the privacy and security of your data extremely seriously, and we are taking immediate action to prevent any similar issues by conducting a thorough investigation, strengthening our system architecture, & further enhancing our monitoring of third-party service providers.”
Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.
In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.
A new NYT Strands puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Saturday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Strands hints and answers for Saturday, February 7 (game #706).
Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.
Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.
Advertisement
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #707) – hint #1 – today’s theme
What is the theme of today’s NYT Strands?
• Today’s NYT Strands theme is… Make it fancy
NYT Strands today (game #707) – hint #2 – clue words
Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.
SHARP
STICK
CLAP
GLOVE
SLOG
CRISP
NYT Strands today (game #707) – hint #3 – spangram letters
How many letters are in today’s spangram?
• Spangram has 15 letters
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #707) – hint #4 – spangram position
What are two sides of the board that today’s spangram touches?
First side: top, 2nd column
Last side: bottom, 5th column
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #707) – the answers
(Image credit: New York Times)
The answers to today’s Strands, game #707, are…
Advertisement
OLIVE
CHERRY
SHRIMP
TWIST
CELERY
SPRIG
SPANGRAM: COCKTAILGARNISH
My rating: Hard
My score: 1 hint
I knew I was in trouble after getting six non-game words without a clue as to what today’s theme was about.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
A hint gave me OLIVE, but it took me a little while to twist it into a word despite it being just five letters long. At this point I thought the search must be for hors d’oeuvres and fancy party snacks.
After getting CHERRY I finally got it and worked my way around the board gathering other cocktail fancies, including the spectacular spangram in the shape of a cocktail glass – chin, chin.
Advertisement
Yesterday’s NYT Strands answers (Saturday, February 7, game #706)
DULL
MUNDANE
DREARY
TIRESOME
HUMDRUM
SPANGRAM: WATCHINGPAINTDRY
What is NYT Strands?
Strands is the NYT’s not-so-new-any-more word game, following Wordle and Connections. It’s now a fully fledged member of the NYT’s games stable that has been running for a year and which can be played on the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
I’ve got a full guide to how to play NYT Strands, complete with tips for solving it, so check that out if you’re struggling to beat it each day.
Els Pet Orbitie for $290: This is one of the least expensive automatic litter boxes, but it functions much like the more expensive models, with an internal 65-liter-capacity orb that rotates and catches clumps with a plastic grate, depositing them into a bag-lined box below. The opening is a generous 12 by 12 inches—plenty big enough for my two 7-year-old cats, who took to it almost immediately despite never having seen anything but a traditional litter box. The accompanying Orbitie app doesn’t offer an extensive amount of information; it tells the user the volume of litter and what step of the cleaning phase the box is currently in, as well as how many times the box has been used and at what times. The first test unit I received was faulty—it sent multiple phantom alerts to the app, letting me know it had cleaned itself as many as 36 times a day, which I knew for a fact was not true. The replacement unit, however, works just as intended, though the bin beneath fills up fast (about every other day with my two cats), and it occasionally needs to be disassembled and cleaned, as tiny pieces of cat litter have a tendency to get in the gears beneath the orb (and make a loud grinding noise). However, this isn’t an unusual occurrence even with pricier boxes. Online reviews panned an earlier version of this box, but Orbitie says this is an improved version. Thankfully, like the bigger brands, Orbitie also offers a 90-day money-back guarantee if you’re on the fence. —Kat Merck
Photograph: Molly Higgins
FurryTail Automatic Litter Box Pro for $400: I was surprised by how quickly and easily my cats took to this device—even my larger cat, who hates change, started using it right away. Setup was super easy, and the box comes with a year’s supply of waste bag liners, an additional grate attachment, and a mat to reduce litter tracking. Similar to many models, the spherical orb rotates, sifting dirty litter into a waste bag, which, on this model, is on top of the machine rather than below. The box has both a manual display and buttons on the machine, as well as an app to adjust settings. I’d include this model in our top picks because of how easy it was to set up and use, as well as how much my cats liked it, but the app was basically useless. Through the app, you can adjust settings like timed cleanings and do-not-disturb modes, manually clean, and monitor waste levels. However, the app never tracked usage or weight, and for the majority of the time, didn’t clean when I manually instructed it to. The sensors would sense ghost cats and refuse to clean, with the device not automatically cycling for the majority of the day (which sort of defeats the purpose). This automatic box has tons of potential, but I can’t fully recommend it until the kinks (especially in the app) are ironed out.
Advertisement
Courtesy of Smarty Pear
Casa Leo Leo’s Loo Too Automatic Litter Box for $700: This automatic litter box was a top pick for a long time, but it’s pricey and a bit cramped for some cats. We still like it, but think the options above are better for most people (and cats). There are four weight sensors inside the barrel to detect when a cat is still inside (it needs just 1 pound of weight to detect your cat), an anti-pinch sensor (for fingers and paws), and a radar system that detects when anyone, feline or human, is near it. For extra cleanliness, it also uses ultraviolet light for extra sanitation. The Smarty Pear app (on iOS and Android) alerts you when the drawer is full (about once a week), records the times your cat uses it and the cat’s weight, and you can set it to automatically clean six seconds to 20 minutes after your cat uses it. You can start a cleaning session manually from the app or use your voice if you connect the box to Alexa or Google Assistant. Former WIRED reviewer Medea Giordano’s biggest struggle using the Loo Too was pouring new litter into it, which can be tricky because of the small entry hole. The barrel is also pretty cramped, especially for her 12-pound cat.
Photograph: Simon Hill
PetSafe ScoopFree SmartSpin Self-Cleaning Litter Box for $370: This basic automatic litter box is around half the price but has a similar design to more expensive models. This futuristic-looking pod on legs has a rubbery bottom, a weight detector that sets off the cleaning cycle a few minutes after your cat has done its business, and a slide-out tray in the bottom. After they’ve been, the body rotates, and a mesh catches the clumps and deposits them in the tray, where there’s a bag with a wee deodorizer unit that smells like watermelon. You can connect it to Wi-Fi and review your cat’s toilet visits in the app on your phone, where each entry displays the time they went, their weight, and toilet trip duration. This self-cleaning box was easy to build and works surprisingly well, even though it feels kinda cheap. Ultimately, as a relatively affordable self-cleaning device, the PetSafe ScoopFree SmartSpin is worth a look. —Simon Hill
Not Recommended
Photograph: Molly Higgins
PetSnowy Snow+ Self-Cleaning Litter Box for $680: This box looks like something from Kubrick’s visions of space travel, or if Eames started making plastic litter boxes. It takes up quite a bit of horizontal floor space, so it may not be ideal for those in cramped apartments looking to conserve space. Unlike all others on this list, this globe is closed during cleaning, which could cause injury if the machine malfunctioned and didn’t sense a cat. The box also doesn’t tell you when the litter’s low or needs to be refilled. My cats had a really hard time using it—they just couldn’t understand that it was a litter box. Older cats could have a tough time jumping into it, and the smaller opening could be a problem if you have bigger cats. It might be great for someone who wants to keep things tidy—it’s extremely clean, smells good, and hugely reduces litter tracking. However, we just can’t recommend the device since it’s closed during cleaning, which is not safe.
Advertisement
Petlibro Luma Smart Litter Box for $600: I’m a big fan of Petlibro’s automatic feeders and fountains, but I’ve found that the brand’s other tech products, like this automatic litter box and AI-enabled pet camera, aren’t on the same level. First, we cannot recommend any model that closes completely during cleaning cycles. The Luma is outfitted with tons of sensors to prevent cleaning while a cat (or any object) is inside or near the entrance, and I highly doubt injury would occur. But the globe spins backward and forward, rather than clockwise and counterclockwise, meaning that the entrance is closed during cycling. If a sensing malfunction happened, the cat would be trapped inside. I appreciated the button controls on the outside top, which allow for manual control. However, they’re on a touchscreen above the camera. So, oftentimes, when I tried to manually reset, the camera caught me and wouldn’t continue the cleaning or control I asked of it, because the safety features would prevent action inside the box. It was very frustrating. When I went out of town, it got stuck in the middle of the cleaning cycle for two days because it kept sensing a ghost cat. The globe was mid-cycle, and the entrance was covered; I couldn’t bypass via the app to keep cleaning. (Thank God I had a second litter box for my cats available, or I would’ve been SOL.) The auto-deodorizing feature goes off automatically for five minutes after each use and sounds like an airplane engine. There’s no way to turn it off; you can turn the power down to a lower level, but it’s still egregiously loud. Right now, I can’t recommend this model (mostly for safety reasons), but a lot of the design flaws could be fixed in future iterations to make it a solid choice.
Photograph: Molly Higgins
The Pet Zone Smart Scoop for $166: This is probably the least “smart” automatic litter box we’ve tested—it’s a typical rectangular plastic box with an automatic arm that acts as a rake and scoops the clumped (soiled) litter into a small bin on the other side. Once the cat leaves, it begins a 15-minute countdown and the rake slides over the length of the box, (ideally) scooping up the waste and lifting it into the receptacle. You’re only allowed to fill the device with about an inch and a half of litter, which my cats didn’t like (they prefer a few inches to really bury it). The rake doesn’t stop when it’s in the cleaning cycle—even if something jumps in, which is potentially dangerous. My cats tend to pee on the side of the litter box, which, because of the rake’s placement, means it misses an inch on either side—I still had to scrape the caked-on litter from the edges. The cycle timing can’t be adjusted, so the litter didn’t have time to clump completely, and the rake would immediately break it down into smaller clumps that would then be missed because they were too small. For me, the hassle’s not worth it, and I’d rather just scoop it myself.
How Do Automatic Litter Boxes Work?
Automatic litter boxes vary depending on the brand and litter type. Generally, they have sensors, either by motion or weight, to tell when a cat has entered or exited the device. Usually customizable and controlled via app on your phone, or on a more rudimentary timer system, the cleaning cycle will begin a short time after the cat has used the box. With dome-shaped litter boxes, the cleaning will happen via a cycle where the litter spins and rotates around the spherical interior; the bigger soiled clumps will be deposited into the waste basket while the clean granules pass through the grates and get recycled back into the box.
The Petkit PuraMax 2, for example, rotates backward and then forward (rather than a clock-wise/counter-clockwise spin cycle) to sift the clumps from the clean litter, depositing the larger clumps into the waste basket. The Pet Zone Smart Scoop is the most rudimentary we tested, simply using a rake attachment to scoop the bigger clumps into a waste receptacle in the back.
Advertisement
Are Automatic Litter Boxes Safe?
Pet owners should always do research and make an informed decision regarding which box is best for them and their cat. We only tested automatic litter boxes that remain open during cycling to ensure that if for some reason the weight sensors didn’t pick up on a cat being inside, the cat could jump out. We don’t recommend devices that close completely because of the potential that the machine could not sense the cat and kill it during its automatic cycle.
These automatic boxes use sensors—some only needing 1 pound of weight to detect your cat—where the cycle will automatically stop no matter where it is in the cleaning process. Many also have anti-pinch sensors. For added security, the devices on this list have customizable schedules, including “do not disturb” modes. If you’re a neurotic helicopter cat mom like me, you could only run the clean cycles when you choose, like when you’re in the room to observe the cycle (although if you do that, the box won’t stay clean for as long).
Where Should I Put the Automatic Litter Box?
Advertisement
All of these automatic litter boxes require electricity, so they will need to be near an outlet. Since cats will generally take a little while to get comfortable with their new potty, I recommend that you keep your old litter box until they use the device regularly. It helps to put the new automatic litter box near the old boxes to familiarize your cat with it. Adding in litter attractant and using old litter from the previous box also encourages your cat to use the new model.
As a general rule, for old-school litter boxes, you should have one box for each cat, plus one. With automatic models constantly cleaning, there is less need for multiple options, but we recommend leaving your old litter box out for an extended period to ensure the cat has acclimated to the new automatic box.
History of the Automatic Litter Box
Rudimentary automatic litter boxes have been around since the late ’80s. These early models featured an automatic rake attachment (much like the Pet Zone Smart Scoop box) but had problems with reliability and loudness. It wasn’t until the 2010s that the devices started incorporating advanced tech like Wi-Fi and app control. In the decade since, that technology has continuously grown and improved, with most devices providing insight into your cats’ habits and health—truly becoming an asset in understanding your feline friends even better.
Advertisement
What Should You Look for When Shopping?
After testing around a dozen automatic litter boxes, I look for several things that make day-to-day life with the device easier for you and your pet. First, the connected app. This is what you’ll be checking daily, so it’s important that it works well. This is one of the reasons the Litter-Robot 4 was our top pick for a long time: its connected app is intuitive, simple to use, and reliable. I absolutely love the Petkit models we’ve tested, but the app is subpar, overcrowded with ads for other products and poorly translated. I also look for anything that makes filling litter easier: I love the Litter-Hopper attachment, which refills litter for you on Litter-Robot models, the self-filling litter reservoir on Homerunpet, and the self-sealing waste bags of the newest Petkit models. You’ll also want to keep the cat’s size in mind. My two cats are large, so I tend to opt for something with an extra-large, front-facing hole. What box you choose depends on litter type and compatibility—if you’re using tofu litter, make sure you get a model that is compatible with your preferred type. Budget is also a factor, with some models as low as $150 or as high as nearly a grand.
How Does WIRED Select Models to Be Reviewed?
I do a lot of research, looking up other reviews online, including our competitors, to see which are getting buzz. Since I’m the pet tech writer here at WIRED, I also have knowledge from other pet tech brands I love for things like automatic feeders and pet water fountains. Most of these brands also have automatic litter boxes, which I always try to test among their lineup of new pet tech. I also talk to other cat-parents to see what they’re using (and liking). I aim to test a wide range of styles and price points for every type of budget and cat.
Advertisement
How Does WIRED Acquire the Boxes?
Oftentimes, we reach out to brands we’re excited about and are gifted them for potential review. Other times, if there is a model we want to try but can’t reach the brand for, we will buy it ourselves. I bought the The Pet Zone Smart Scoop, but it isn’t a model we recommend others buy.
What Does WIRED Do With Them After Testing?
Some products that we’re really excited about, we keep for long-term testing to see if they hold up over time. This is especially useful for our former top pick, the Litter-Robot 4, whose Litter-Hopper attachment eventually stopped working, or the Petkit models, whose AI starts falling flat without a Care+ subscription. Keeping some devices for longer-term testing helps ensure that we are giving our readers a comprehensive review. Most models we test for several weeks and donate locally when finished.
During the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, 5G and 4K were the leading technologies available to many viewers. There was some AI, but it was mostly used for athletes’ benefit. For the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Games there will be more technology than ever, for both athletes and fans.
Much of that technology has never been used at the Games before, says Yiannis Exarchos, the managing director of Olympic Broadcasting Services and executive director of Olympic Channel Services. The two organizations are responsible for producing much of the television, radio, and digital coverage, and content on Olympics.com. “In Milano Cortina, people will have unprecedented experiences,” Exarchos says.
Here’s everything you need to know.
New Technologies at the 2026 Winter Olympics
Advertisement
Drone Views of Athlete Performances
One of the big technologies coming to the Milano Cortina Olympics are first-person view, or FPV, drones. These radio-controlled aircraft transmit images from their onboard cameras in real time to “offer dynamic perspectives on the race tracks,” Exarchos explains.
This year’s Games will also be the first to offer 360-degree real-time replay. Offered as part of a collaboration with Alibaba, the system uses multi-camera replay systems and stoboscopic analysis to ofter multi-angle views, freeze frames, and slow-motion images of athlete’s incredible moves.
Another first is a new tracking system for curling stones. “It will be possible to view the path, speed, and rotation of each stone in real time,” Exarchos explains. Suspended rail cameras and ice-level views will help viewers understand the game better, as will detailed stone trajectory graphics and real-time data.
Advertisement
The Olympics’ New AI Tool: Olympic GPT
Got a question about this year’s Games? Olympic GPT is here to help. The bot specializes in producing content for the Olympics.com website. It’ll offer real-time results and information on sport regulations, and, for the first time, will have the ability to interact with questions about the results of ongoing competitions.
“Artificial-intelligence-based article summaries on Olympics.com will give fans a quick and clear overview,” Exarchos says. “They highlight key points to help users decide what to explore further, while also improving accessibility and reading from mobile devices.”
Virtual Video Production
Advertisement
For the 2026 Winter Olympic Games, a lot of the video production will be moving to the cloud. Virtual outside broadcasting (OB) vans will help decentralize the process of getting images from events to fans’ screens. Using virtual cloud infrastructure, organizers say, helps reduce energy consumption by some 50 percent and enables remote production for events like curling and speed skating.
Everything will be managed through an entirely cloud-based master control room recently tested at the Dakar Rally in Saudi Arabia in January. There, space savings were 75 percent over the previous championship, while energy consumption was reduced by 65 percent.
The Olympics’ Big Data Moment
For this winter’s Games, Olympic Broadcasting Services is also testing an automated description platform to help teams manage the huge volume of video coming in live during their events. “Artificial intelligence breaks down broadcasts into searchable clips, suggests shot descriptions and keywords, and helps users quickly find highlights, making storytelling faster and easier,” says Exarchos. AI will then analyze real-time traffic spikes on Olympics.com and identify the most valuable moments for fans.
Advertisement
This story originally appeared inWIRED Italia. It has been translated from Italian.
It’s 2005, and the computer room has been vibrating for two hours straight, my fingers gliding across the keyboard copying HTML and Java code while jamming to the latest R&B CD I burned. No, I’m not a computer programming wiz — I’m designing my MySpace page. I spend countless hours choosing the perfect song, trying to figure out why my About section header isn’t bold, and how to get those glittery GIFs to work.
I was in sixth grade when MySpace became popular, and today, my niece, an avid TikTok-er, is the same age I was back then. So after spending most of the summer rejecting my niece’s urgent requests to join in on her trending TikTok dances, I did what any researcher would do — start with “me-search.” I asked my niece what her TikTok would tell someone about her that they wouldn’t otherwise know.
“I’m trendy. I’m into fashion. I like to dance,” she said.
Thinking back to my constant MySpace page redesigning, Top 8 tweaks, and song choice updates, my obsession with getting the page just right wasn’t all that different from Gen Z and Gen Alpha’s TikTok fixation.
Granted, I could easily shut down the computer, leave the room, go hang out with friends, do homework, and not think about it until a new song hit me so deeply I thought, “this should be on my page!”
Advertisement
In contrast, observing my niece and her friends today, I wonder why kids just can’t get off that particular app.
Yes, there have been relative social and cultural changes since the mid-2000s, but there is one inimitable variable: the COVID-19 shutdowns. We heard a lot about Gen Z or “Zoomers,” during the COVID-19 pandemic, coming of age and entering college in virtual school classrooms. But the pandemic shutdowns also forced the newest generation at the time, Gen Alpha, to interact in the virtual world. I remember my niece’s last few months of kindergarten on Zoom. For career day, she said she wanted to be a “brain doctor,” so we dressed her up as a surgeon. Watching the kids excitedly scan their classmates’ Zoom boxes to guess each other’s costumes. Between this virtual reality and TikTok’s tweaks to its algorithms and features, we have the perfect storm for what psychologists call “short video addiction.”
This timeline doesn’t start with TikTok, but its accessible video creation lowered the stakes when the mass exodus from what used to be Twitter turned users toward other platforms that prioritize influencers and sponsored content in its feeds, making the average user a content- consuming doom scroller instead of a participant in —– our not-so-social —– social media. Over the past few years, surveys of user behavior have shown a downward trend in people posting and an increase in influencer and product ads. When TikTok’s low-stakes algorithms made going viral seem attainable for any user who can hop on a trending sound or dance, the rest of its competitors iterated — Instagram Reels, FaceBook Reels, YouTube Shorts — all on an eternally refreshing loop of new content.
With how much time and energy children today pour into videos and social media, it prompts the question of whether we can harness that for something potentially a little more productive: education.
Advertisement
Scroll Science
Can learning be as addictive as TikTok?
Well, let’s look at the science behind why it’s so addictive. You’ve probably heard about dopamine. It isn’t just our brain’s pleasure chemical — it’s also the learning signal that releases after unexpected rewards, especially from low-effort activity, like swiping from reel to reel and finding even better DIY project ideas you’ve been wanting to get to.
We experience either positive, negative, or zero reward prediction error, which keeps us striving for more rewards. Neuroscience research gives us a clear picture of what’s happening in our brains when we’re watching short-form videos. Our brains are constantly predicting what will happen next — it’s one of the ways we stay safe and make sense of the world. Reward prediction error is that chemical magic that happens when our prediction is wrong. It’s the same basic mechanism used to design slot machines and other variable-reward systems.
With endless video loops, when the next clip is better than we expected — the kind that’s so spot-on you immediately save it or send it to the group chat — our brain gives us a small dopamine boost. When a video is boring, we get no dopamine. When it’s disappointing, dopamine briefly dips. That constant cycle of maybe this next one will be great, new information, or useful is what keeps us scrolling.With every social media feed carefully curated for each user, there are dozens of algorithms learning what holds your gaze to feed you more of what will keep you on the app or website. For me, it’s funny parenting reels and home improvement YouTube Shorts. Of course I need to see the difference between galvanized and stainless steel screws for my next DIY project. That’s the sense of novelty and variable rewards that keeps us scrolling.
Advertisement
Lastly, because the feeds just keep feeding more content through the infinite scroll feature, there’s no natural stopping point, so there is never a cue to stop and end the scrolling session.
Recent neuroscience studies show that high TikTok usage can activate brain regions tied to impulse and habit formation. In another recent study, researchers looked at electroencephalogram, or EEG tests, to assess the relationship between youth and young adults’ frequent short video consumption and reduced attention control, higher levels of stress, and learning fatigue. These are the makings of short video addiction, a condition researchers suggest is worthy of a spot in the DSM-5.
We Can Make Learning As Addictive
But should we?
It sounds like a good idea. It reminds me of when adults would say, “if only you knew your times tables like you know those rap songs.” But in this case, it’s not as simple as putting math on hip-hop beats.
Imagine your child or student’s TikTok infinite scroll were actually mini-lessons on tectonic plates, followed by how a basketball arc follows a parabola, and each 30‑second video ended with a satisfying “aha” moment and a surprising new fact. The algorithm could learn what students enjoy and what they are struggling with, then feed them culturally relevant examples with humor and well-timed reveals. It would feel great, and your students might start saying, “Just one more reel,” as they send you GIFs and memes — seemingly addicted to learning!
Advertisement
Let’s look deeper at the science of learning. These techniques would likely keep students engaged, producing frequent dopamine hits, but for information to register as learning, though, we need a little more than dopamine and surprise rewards. Learning requires effortful processing, retrieval, and opportunities to apply ideas in new situations. Otherwise, our educational TikTok app prototype could fall into the loop of attention trap, making it easy to go from education to edu-tainment without the friction of problem-solving that makes learning stick.
This is where the attention trap shows up: a stream of highly optimized, bite-sized “aha” moments can keep eyes glued to the screen while quietly removing the productive friction of wrestling with problems, making choices, and getting feedback — the very processes that strengthen memory, understanding, and transfer. When the system does all the cognitive heavy lifting, students get edu‑tainment: they feel informed and interested, but they have not built the durable mental models that let them explain, use, or remember the ideas later.
Learning takes more than clever hooks and sticky formats. Digital experiences can be engaging — even addictive — but if they skip struggle and retrieval, they risk producing the illusion of learning rather than the real thing. As educators, the goal is not to compete with short‑form platforms on sheer stickiness, but to design experiences where attention is channeled into thinking, problem‑solving, and revisiting ideas over time.
Education apps can be addictive, but I’m not sure we want them to be. Then there might be too many people like me — addicted to the infinite scroll of YouTube Shorts on neuroscience and psychology research.
“U.S. and World Health Organization guidelines no longer specify a minimum duration of moderate or vigorous aerobic activity.”
Movement-tracking studies show even tiny, regular bursts of effort — as short as 30 seconds — can capture many of the health benefits of the gym. Climbing two to three flights of stairs a few times per day could change your life. Experts call it VILPA, or vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity. “The message now is that all activity counts,” said Martin Gibala, a professor and former chair of the kinesiology department at McMaster University in Canada… Just taking the stairs daily is associated with lower body weight and cutting the risk of stroke and heart disease — the leading (and largely preventable) cause of death globally. While it may not burn many calories (most exercise doesn’t), it does appear to extend your health span. Leg power — a measure of explosive muscle strength — was a stronger predictor of brain aging than any lifestyle factors measured in a 2015 study in the journal Gerontology…
Advertisement
How little activity can you do? Four minutes daily. Essentially, a few flights of stairs at a vigorous pace. That’s the effort [Emmanuel Stamatakis, a professor of physical activity and population health at the University of Sydney] found delivered significant health benefits in that 2022 study of British non-exercisers. “We saw benefits from the first minute,” Stamatakis said. For Americans, the effect is even more dramatic: a 44 percent drop in deaths, according to a peer-reviewed paper recently accepted for publication. “We showed for the first time that vigorous intensity, even if it’s done as part of the day-to-day routine, not in a planned and structured manner, works miracles,” Stamatakis said. “The key principle here is start with one, two minutes a day. The focus should be on making sure that it’s something that you can incorporate into your daily routine. Then you can start thinking about increasing the dose.”
Intensity is the most important factor. You won’t break a sweat in a brief burst, but you do need to feel it. A highly conditioned athlete might need to sprint to reach vigorous territory. But many people need only to take the stairs. Use your breathing as a guide, Stamatakis said: If you can sing, it’s light intensity. If you can speak but not sing, you’re entering moderate exertion. If you can’t hold a conversation, it’s vigorous. The biggest benefits come from moderate to vigorous movement. One minute of incidental vigorous activity prevents premature deaths, heart attacks or strokes as well as about three minutes of moderate activity or 35 to 49 minutes of light activity.
The European Commission said today that TikTok is facing a fine because its addictive features, including infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications, and personalized recommendation systems, are breaching the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA).
According to preliminary findings, TikTok has failed to adequately assess how these features could harm users’ physical and mental well-being, including minors and vulnerable adults.
The commission found that TikTok fuels the users’ urge to keep scrolling and shifts their brains into “autopilot mode” by constantly rewarding users with new content, potentially reducing self-control and leading to compulsive behavior.
TikTok has also disregarded important indicators of compulsive use, including the time minors spend on the app at night and how frequently users open it, the commission added.
If the findings are confirmed, the violations could trigger a fine of up to 6% of TikTok’s global annual turnover. To avoid being fined for violating the EU’s digital regulations, the commission said TikTok needs to change its core service design by implementing screen time breaks, adapting its recommendation system, and disabling key addictive features.
Advertisement
“Social media addiction can have detrimental effects on the developing minds of children and teens, said EU tech commissioner Henna Virkkunen on Friday.
“The Digital Services Act makes platforms responsible for the effects they can have on their users. In Europe, we enforce our legislation to protect our children and our citizens online.”
The commission added that while TikTok has some mitigation measures, such as parental controls and screen-time management tools, these are likely ineffective because they are easy to dismiss and require parents to enable them manually.
In November, French prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into TikTok, accusing it of failing to safeguard the mental health of children.
Advertisement
The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) fined TikTok €530 million (over $601 million) in May 2025 for illegally transferring the personal data of users in the European Economic Area (EEA) to China, in violation of the EU’s GDPR data protection regulations.
Two years earlier, the Irish watchdog slapped TikTok with a €345 million ($368 million) fine for violating children’s privacy by processing their data and employing “dark patterns” during registration and video posting.
Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.
In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.