With a quote in minutes, Boxt Solar makes it easy to start your solar journey. I found that high-quality solar panels and professional installation let me make the most of my roof space and generate a decent amount of power from my south-facing roof.
Boxt Solar might not be right for those with special requirements (flat roofs aren’t supported, for example, and there’s only a basic choice of inverter and solar battery), but if your home is ripe for a straightforward installation, the service is professional and smooth.
Very competitive price
Simple quotation and installation process
Excellent and neat installation
High quality solar panels and other components
Initial communication could be better
No support for flat roofs
Introduction
Solar power is a brilliant, simple way to generate electricity from the sun. With technology improving, installation costs dropping, and high electricity prices, there’s never been a better time to kit your house out. While there are many companies offering installation, I’ve tried out Boxt Solar.
As with its boiler installation service, the idea behind Boxt Solar is to offer a simple quoting and installation process at very competitive prices. The flip side is that some types of roofs can’t be used for solar panels, and there’s a more limited choice of hardware than you might get with some alternatives. But, if you’ve got a house that can take a straightforward installation, the quality and simplicity of Boxt could make it a good choice.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Quote and buying
Get a quote fast
Competitive pricing
Project finalisation could do with extra detail
The Boxt Solar installation process starts with the website and a super-quick quotation process. Just tap in your postcode, select your home using the satellite image, and answer a few basic questions about the house and roof type, and you get a basic quote through.
This basic quotation makes an initial assumption about the number of solar panels you can have, and gives you a choice over the number and type of batteries you might want.
It’s remarkably quick. Having been thinking about getting solar installed for some time, I’ve been through the quotation process with several other providers in the past, and in many cases have had to wait for a final quote.
Even where I have had a quote instantly elsewhere, the price was higher and Boxt, as it is for its boiler service, is hugely competitive.
This initial quote process does highlight some of the restrictions of Boxt’s service. For starters, the company doesn’t support flat roofs. Depending on which way your house is orientated, that could be an issue.
Advertisement
Advertisement
For example, I live in a Victorian terraced house, and have had a loft conversion, so the back part of the roof is all flat. Fortunately, the front of my house is pretty much due south, which is ideal for solar; however, my neighbours over the road with loft conversions would find that their south-facing roofs are all flat, so not suitable for solar with Boxt.
There’s an argument for my house to use the flat roof for increased solar capacity, although that wouldn’t be possible with Boxt. I do get why this decision has been made. Installing solar on a flat roof is more complicated, so it’s harder to give an instant quote for and would make the system more complicated.
If you do have a lot of flat roof that you want to use, then Boxt isn’t for you, and you’ll want to talk to a more specialist company that can offer this kind of installation.
Advertisement
Next, from the installation process, you’ll see that the choice of components is relatively small. You can have a Sunsynk hybrid inverter only, rated to match the size of your array.
Then there’s a choice of just Sunsynk batteries (up to three 5.3kWh), or a Tesla PowerWall 3 13.5kWh.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
While the choice is limited, Boxt has at least taken highly-rated products, well-suited to the jobs. The Sunsynk 3.6kW Ecco Hybrid Inverter that was quoted for my system is compact and rated for up to 7000W of DC input, with a constant 3.6kWh output and support for batteries. Likewise, the companies batteries are highly specced.
While the choice may be low, focusing on a few key components makes the process simple and helps keep the price down.
Advertisement
It’s the same with the solar panels, which are all AIKO NEOSTART S3 Mono-Glass panels. These are highly rated panels, and Boxt will update to the best available. When I got my first quote, it was for 460W panels, but before installation, they were upgraded to 475W panels at no extra cost.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
I decided not to opt for a battery: working at home all day, I tend to use a lot of electricity throughout the day; I don’t have a huge amount of space to put a battery; and the relatively small footprint of my roof limits the size of array I can have and, therefore, how much spare power there is to charge a battery. Whether or not a battery is right for you will depend on your installation and how much power you generate.
Overall, the system came in at £4699 for five panels and no battery (with buy one get one free on the solar panels, and bird protection), which is great value. Pricing and offers do change quite regularly, but this gives you an idea of the cost.
Advertisement
A quote includes the full installation cost, with scaffolding, and there’s a two-year workmanship guarantee covered. All installations come with an HIES deposit guarantee, which protects your deposit should the installer cease trading before work is completed.
Advertisement
Before installation can go ahead, you need to provide images of your home, including the roof, and inside and outside areas. You then have a call to confirm your selection and what can be done on your house.
It’s at this point that you need to think about where to put everything. If you’ve got a garage or side wall with plenty of space on a path, using that space probably makes sense; if not, then you’ll need space for the inverter and battery. Both can go outside, but it’s important to clarify where you’d like them to go.
As mentioned, I didn’t go for a battery, so I needed space for the inverter only, which I wanted on my external wall, to the left of the bay window. I did feel as though this process could do with a bit more information and, perhaps, some photos of what an installed inverter looks like in a typical house (inside and out) for size reasons.
I was told that I needed space for the inverter, but regulations mean that you need isolation switches, and you may need an additional consumer input for the incoming feed. Where you want all of this stuff should be considered before installation.
Advertisement
During the call, there’s a confirmation of how many solar panels you can have. There’s no site visit, so satellite photos and images of neighbouring properties are used as a guide. In my case, my next-door neighbour already has solar, with six panels, so that was used as a guide.
Advertisement
I was told that potentially it would be five panels rather than six, due to the size of the panel that Boxt uses. That’s fine, as there’s only so much physical space, but at this point it would have been useful if I had been sent a quote for both a five- and six-panel system.
That’s particularly important, as the quote gives you a breakdown of how much electricity you will likely generate over the year, as well as how long it will take the system to pay itself off.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
It’s a detailed report, but there is a difference between having five and six panels, and it’s good to have all of the information to hand. I say this more as a piece of information: if you start going through a quote with Boxt, just make sure you ask for additional quotes if there’s a chance you’ll end up with fewer solar panels than you first thought.
What I can say is that the report generated is thorough. It uses average data based from across the UK, based on the orientation of your roof, and makes it easier to make an informed decision based on your home.
I’m lucky in that my roof is almost directly south-facing, so about as good as you’ll get. If your house has an east- or west-facing roof, then you’ll get less direct sun, so you’ll generate less power and it will take longer to pay back.
Advertisement
In all cases, solar is a long-term investment. For my house, the system is estimated to take 11 years to pay back, paying up front. If you want to take finance, then the report lets you select three, five or 10 year finance options to see the difference in payback time and savings.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Having all of this to hand makes it much easier to make an informed decision. With any solar installation, it’s well worth analysing the data to make sure the system is worth it.
Assuming everything aligns and you’re happy with the quote, then the installation can be booked in. Boxt, like other solar installers are busy, but it shouldn’t take more than a few weeks until a slot is available.
Installation
Professional, clean installation
Make sure you’re very clear where everything will go
Installation is via one of Boxt’s teams. There’s good communication, with clear information on when the scaffolding will go up and come back down, and when the installation team will be on site, turning up with the solar panels, inverter and, if you ordered, a battery.
Advertisement
My scaffolding went up a few days before the planned installation. It was done neatly and professionally, and it was securely fastened to a stable work platform for the solar team to work on. As an aside, it was also useful to get up to the roof and sort out the very dirty gutters!
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
On installation day, the team arrived on time and were great: friendly, polite and easy to deal with. The first thing mentioned was that the six panels I’d ordered wouldn’t fit, so it would have to be five panels.
This is something that a site visit would have confirmed immediately. And, if I’d have had the five-panel quote, I would have had more information on whether to progress or not. I still would have gone ahead, but finding out on the day that I was effectively one panel down wasn’t ideal, and a bit more communication from Boxt pre-installation would have been good.
Advertisement
As the team had a spare solar panel, this was left at the end of installation, and needed to be collected separately. I left the panel outside (it’s too big to fit in my home) and found out a few days later that the collection hadn’t been arranged; a quick online chat with the help team fixed it.
Back to the installation, the job on the roof was immaculate. Many solar installations use mounting bars for the panels. Depending on the number and orientation of the panels, this can mean the ends of the bars stick out. Boxt uses individual mounts for each panel, that clamp under the tiles.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
This gives a much neater finish winothing sticking out from the sides of the panels.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Likewise, the bird proofing is very neat. Rather than using a mesh, which a bird could get its foot caught in, Boxt uses vertical bits of metal, which feels safer, while stopping pigeons from getting under the panels.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
I can’t say how important it is to opt for the bird proofing. My neighbours originally had their system installed without, and pigeons got under it, with red mites making their way into their home, so they retrospectively added it. Avoid this and make sure you have bird proofing from the start.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The rest of the installation was done with precision and neatness, and I like the way that the cables on the roof where tucked under the tiles to keep them out of site. Sure, I was always going to end up with some cables running down the front of the house, but where cables could be hidden, they were.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
There are a few more components to think about. An extra consumer unit was required, which can go inside or out.
I went for an outside installation, with a neat weatherproof box on the wall. Regulations require that an isolator switch is installed below this, which is fine: this switch is a bit ugly, but a pot-plant in front of it hides the switch, while still giving easy access to it.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
My inverter was installed at head height, even though I had asked the pre-installation team to keep it as low as possible. Where the scaffolding was prevented a lower fitting at the time of installation.
Advertisement
Beneath the inverter, there was another strip of cabling with another isolator. Again, this is because of regulations. With the scaffolding up, the inverter wasn’t too visible; with the scaffolding down, the first thing you could see when walking past my house was an inverter, its red and green lights on the Wi-Fi module (please, smart home manufacturers, stop putting lights on everything), and the switches below. While the finish was very professional, the overall look wasn’t great.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
I spoke to Boxt, and had the inverter lowered by just over 50cm, which largely hides it from view as you walk past.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The isolator switches were relocated to under the left-hand-side of the bay window, where they’re easy to access but, crucially, remain hidden.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
I mention this as more of a guide for anyone using Boxt (or, indeed, another installer): make sure you know exactly where the inverter and any switches will go, and confirm exactly where you want them prior to installation.
Overall, the final installation was expertly done, and looked neater than other installations I’ve spotted walking around my neighbourhood, particularly with the panels themselves. I also prefer the inverter to be outside, as it would take up too much room inside a small, terraced house (it’s almost like those pesky Victorians didn’t think about solar panels when building millions of these houses).
At the end of the installation, Boxt commissions the inverter and gets it connected to your Wi-Fi. Boxt maintains the inverter’s master account and invites you as a full admin guest.
This makes a lot of sense, as if there are any issues, the support team can look at the app and see what’s going on.
Advertisement
From the Sunsynk app, you can see how much solar is being generated, what a battery (if connected) is doing and, via a clamp, how much power you’re drawing or sending to the grid. This information can have a slight delay, but it should give a close approximation of what’s going on.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
For overall power consumption, I find that the Octopus app is best, but the Sunsynk app gives me a breakdown between solar and grid that’s very useful, so I know what I’m generating.
After the installation I was emailed the installation certificates and all the data that’s required for getting on a feed-in tariff. I signed up for the Octopus feed-in tariff as soon as I could, which means I get paid 15p per kWh exported to the grid. This took a few weeks to complete, after which I got a new dashboard in the Octopus app to track my earnings.
Performance
Lots of power on a clear day
Helpful support team
The first thing that I noticed was that the Synsynk app was often quite wrong. It would register the amount of solar power I was generating properly, but the house load and information from the grid was often completely wrong, even accounting for a delay. For example, on a cloudy day with 60W of solar, the Synsynk app would report that I was exporting 14W to the grid, suggesting a house load of just 46W; the Octopus app had it right at around 473W consumed.
Talking to the support team, they could view my inverter and see that the data wasn’t quite right. After sending a firmware update to the inverter and monitoring the system, sent someone round who moved the internal clamp, fixing the issue.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
I find the Sunsynk app useful for seeing how much power I’m generating at any one time, but the Octopus app is better for seeing actual live household use.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Aside from monitoring solar and, if you have one, battery performance, the Sunsynk app isn’t much use. It has a section called Intelligent, where I could connect my Philips Hue lights to the system, using colour-changing to show the state of battery charge. That’s pretty useless, and it’s a shame that there aren’t more features.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
For example, I’d like the app to have the ability to send a notification when solar generation exceeds a certain level, as a prompt to use up some power by turning on the washing machine or dishwasher.
Solar is very much an individual thing, but I can say that I’m impressed with my system. Having had it installed late in December, I was just in time for the shortest days, mixed with dull, cloudy days.
Advertisement
On a clean, bright, sunny day, the system can (so far) deliver up to 1.4kW from a notional capacity of 2.37kW. Once the solar array is fully cranked up, it’s free power in the house, and it’s always nice to check the real-time information from Octopus and see a deficit – sometimes over 1kW.
Advertisement
What difference solar makes can only really be seen over a year, and maximising it does involve rethinking how appliances are used. I can see where solar is working.
Going away at the end of November, with nobody in the house, the 30 November was a nice, bright sunny day. Overall, that day, my usage in the house was just 4.14kWh, which is tiny. Without solar, and just background device usage (fridge, router, etc), I’d expect at least 7kWh. Compared to the previous day (29 November), when we were away but it was cloudy, the hourly breakdown shows what solar does – there are hours where no external power is used.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Pre-installation in November, my average usage was 12.89kWh of power per day; in December that came down to 11.79kWh per day with similar conditions throughout the month.
Where possible, I do try to maximise solar usage. So, on a bright sunny day when running a deficit, I try to run the washing machine, dishwasher and/or tumble dryer. Effectively, these appliances become free to run if there’s solar power.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Via my export tariff, I managed to export 13.75kWh in December, with the tariff only kicking in half-way through the month. That’s £2.06 of earnings. In January, I exported 31.59kWh of power (earning £4.74).
The best export day I had was 4.2kWh, but on dull, cloudy days, there’s nothing going out. What this shows me is that in the colder, darker months, when I use more power, there’s rarely enough spare power to charge a battery for later, so I think I made the right decision not to have one.
While the export figures I have are hardly life-changing, they do make an impact: I basically export enough power that I claw back enough to pay for one and two days’ worth of electricity for nothing.
Once we hit the summer months, with a higher sun and longer daylight hours, my electricity production should massively jump, and sunny days should be almost free for me. I’ll update this review over the year to give a better idea.
Advertisement
Exact savings depend on the amount of sunlight and overall electricity demand, but I can say with confidence that on bright days, the solar panels can generate more power than I use and cope with spikes from higher-demand appliances, such as a washing machine. There’s a clear impact.
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
You want a simple process and a good price
Advertisement
If you can go for a simple straightforward installation, Boxt’s combination of simple sign-up, fast installation and quality components are a winner.
Advertisement
You have more complex needs
If you need to specify which components you want, or have need of a more complicated installation, such as on a flat roof, an alternative supplier might be best.
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
Are solar panels worth it? Without a doubt, if you’ve got the right type of roof that gets adequate sunshine, then a solar system will save you money and generate power that you can use, export and/or top up a battery. It’s worth doing your sums to make sure that any system will pay for itself in an acceptable time frame and if a battery will be of benefit to you.
Would I buy from Boxt Solar? Yes, I would, but with some caveats. For those who need a more complicated installation, such as on a flat roof, or who want specific components (battery, inverter, etc.), then Boxt isn’t for you.
If you want a straightforward installation, then the combination of low price, high-quality components and quality installation is a winner. Just make sure that you get all of your questions answered up front, including where the kit will go exactly, and get quotes for all variations of the number of panels you might have installed, just in case things change on the day. With that information, you can’t go wrong.
FAQs
Do solar panels work on cloudy days?
Advertisement
Yes, but not as efficiently. On an overcast day, my five-panel array can hit up to 267W; on a bright, sunny day, I’ve seen up to 1.4kW of power.
Do solar panels have be cleaned?
Rain will mostly clean off the panels, but having them cleaned yearly can help maintain maximum performance.
Uber Eats is testing a new feature that tries to remove the most annoying part of ordering groceries, the endless searching and tapping. It’s called Cart Assistant, and it can take a typed list or an image and draft a basket for you inside the app.
It’s rolling out as a beta. You’ll see it as a purple icon on a grocery store storefront after you search for the store from the home screen.
Uber hasn’t said exactly which stores and cities get it first, or whether any devices are excluded. It frames the launch as a US release and an early step toward more agent-style help in Uber Eats, where the app handles setup and you handle decisions.
It turns notes into a basket
Cart Assistant is built for the moment you already know what you need. Paste in your grocery notes, or upload an image, including a photo of handwritten items or a screenshot of recipe ingredients, and the app translates that into shoppable picks.
Advertisement
As it drafts the basket, Uber says it checks store availability and surfaces store-level details like pricing and promotions. Then you can edit normally. Swap brands, adjust sizes, remove extras, or keep browsing before checkout.
Uber
Repeat orders get smarter
Uber says Cart Assistant uses your past orders to prioritize familiar staples, which should cut down the time it takes to restock the same basics each week. That’s the kind of AI that earns its keep, because it saves effort without changing how you shop.
It also hints at where Uber wants to go next. The company positions this beta as part of a broader move toward agentic AI, meaning the app can take on multi-step tasks and hand you a result you can still tweak.
Where it helps, and where it may not
You’ll notice Cart Assistant most on routine grocery runs, when you want a solid first draft and you’re happy to fine-tune the last details. It’s less about discovery and more about getting the boring part done.
There’s one catch Uber hasn’t addressed yet, image accuracy. How well it handles low light, cramped handwriting, or very specific branded ingredients will decide whether it feels like magic or like extra cleanup.
Advertisement
Treat it like a draft, not autopilot. If you spot the purple icon, try a short list first, then scale up once you trust its picks on sizes and brands.
Nothing has begun teasing the upcoming Phone 4a with its colour options as a standout feature.
A recent post on X showed coloured dots forming the ‘a’ logo in Nothing’s signature dot‑matrix style. The dots appeared in blue, yellow, pink, white, and black, strongly suggesting these will be the launch colours.
The ‘a’ series remains Nothing’s best‑selling line, so expanding its finishes makes sense. Offering multiple colours could broaden appeal, especially as the Phone 4a edges closer to the flagship experience.
Co‑founder Carl Pei has already confirmed plans to push the device toward higher‑end territory, while still keeping the ‘a’ line affordable compared to the main flagship.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Leaks suggest the Phone 4a will arrive in two versions, mirroring the Phone 3a. This means a standard model and a Pro variant, though Nothing has yet to confirm.
Internally, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chipset is tipped to power the devices, offering improved performance over the previous generation. Cameras are expected to remain similar to the Phone 3a, keeping continuity for existing users while focusing upgrades elsewhere.
The codename for the Phone 4a carries the name “Bellsprout,” continuing Nothing’s tradition of Pokémon‑inspired names. Alongside the phone, another codename, “Hoppip,” points to a possible audio product. Reports suggest new budget-focused Headphone a could launch, though details remain unclear.
Advertisement
Nothing has also stressed that it won’t churn out flagships annually. This stance means the Phone 4 replacement will not arrive soon, leaving the Phone 4a as the next major release. The company’s recent teasers and activity suggest the announcement is close, with leaks pointing to a launch window in the coming weeks.
The colour tease indeed adds excitement. Nothing’s design language consistently leans toward bold, distinctive aesthetics. A multicoloured lineup would give buyers more choice and reinforce the brand’s playful identity.
Combined with performance upgrades and a Pro option, the Phone 4a could become one of the most appealing mid‑range releases of 2026.
On Wednesday, former OpenAI researcher Zoë Hitzig published a guest essay in The New York Times announcing that she resigned from the company on Monday, the same day OpenAI began testing advertisements inside ChatGPT. Hitzig, an economist and published poet who holds a junior fellowship at the Harvard Society of Fellows, spent two years at OpenAI helping shape how its AI models were built and priced. She wrote that OpenAI’s advertising strategy risks repeating the same mistakes that Facebook made a decade ago.
“I once believed I could help the people building A.I. get ahead of the problems it would create,” Hitzig wrote. “This week confirmed my slow realization that OpenAI seems to have stopped asking the questions I’d joined to help answer.”
Hitzig did not call advertising itself immoral. Instead, she argued that the nature of the data at stake makes ChatGPT ads especially risky. Users have shared medical fears, relationship problems, and religious beliefs with the chatbot, she wrote, often “because people believed they were talking to something that had no ulterior agenda.” She called this accumulated record of personal disclosures “an archive of human candor that has no precedent.”
She also drew a direct parallel to Facebook’s early history, noting that the social media company once promised users control over their data and the ability to vote on policy changes. Those pledges eroded over time, Hitzig wrote, and the Federal Trade Commission found that privacy changes Facebook marketed as giving users more control actually did the opposite.
Advertisement
She warned that a similar trajectory could play out with ChatGPT: “I believe the first iteration of ads will probably follow those principles. But I’m worried subsequent iterations won’t, because the company is building an economic engine that creates strong incentives to override its own rules.”
Ads arrive after a week of AI industry sparring
Hitzig’s resignation adds another voice to a growing debate over advertising in AI chatbots. OpenAI announced in January that it would begin testing ads in the US for users on its free and $8-per-month “Go” subscription tiers, while paid Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Education subscribers would not see ads. The company said ads would appear at the bottom of ChatGPT responses, be clearly labeled, and would not influence the chatbot’s answers.
AI models intended to provide companionship for humans are on the rise. People are already frequently developing relationships with chatbots, seeking not just a personal assistant but a source of emotional support.
In response, apps dedicated to providing companionship (such as Character.ai or Replika) have recently grown to host millions of users. Some companies are now putting AI into toys and desktop devices as well, bringing digital companions into the physical world. Many of these devices were on display at CES last month, including products designed specifically for children, seniors, and even your pets.
AI companions are designed to simulate human relationships by interacting with users like a friend would. But human-AI relationships are not well understood, and companies are facing concern about whether the benefits outweigh the risks and potential harm of these relationships, especially for young people. In addition to questions about users’ mental health and emotional well being, sharing intimate personal information with a chatbot poses data privacy issues.
Nevertheless, more and more users are finding value in sharing their lives with AI. So how can we understand the bonds that form between humans and chatbots?
Jaime Banks is a professor at the Syracuse University School of Information Studies who researches the interactions between people and technology—in particular, robots and AI. Banks spoke with IEEE Spectrum about how people perceive and relate to machines, and the emerging relationships between humans and their machine companions.
Defining AI Companionship
How do you define AI companionship?
Advertisement
Jaime Banks: My definition is evolving as we learn more about these relationships. For now, I define it as a connection between a human and a machine that is dyadic, so there’s an exchange between them. It is also sustained over time; a one-off interaction doesn’t count as a relationship. It’s positively valenced—we like being in it. And it is autotelic, meaning we do it for its own sake. So there’s not some extrinsic motivation, it’s not defined by an ability to help us do our jobs or make us money.
I have recently been challenged by that definition, though, when I was developing an instrument to measure machine companionship. After developing the scale and working to initially validate it, I saw an interesting situation where some people do move toward this autotelic relationship pattern. “I appreciate my AI for what it is and I love it and I don’t want to change it.” It fit all those parts of the definition. But then there seems to be this other relational template that can actually be both appreciating the AI for its own sake, but also engaging it for utilitarian purposes.
That makes sense when we think about how people come to be in relationships with AI companions. They often don’t go into it purposefully seeking companionship. A lot of people go into using, for instance, ChatGPT for some other purpose and end up finding companionship through the course of those conversations. And we have these AI companion apps like Replika and Nomi and Paradot that are designed for social interaction. But that’s not to say that they couldn’t help you with practical topics.
Jaime Banks customizes the software for an embodied AI social humanoid robot.Angela Ryan/Syracuse University
Different models are also programmed to have different “personalities.” How does that contribute to the relationship between humans and AI companions?
Advertisement
Banks: One of our Ph.D. students just finished a project about what happened when OpenAI demoted GPT-4o and the problems that people encountered, in terms of companionship experiences when the personality of their AI just completely changed. It didn’t have the same depth. It couldn’t remember things in the same way.
That echoes what we saw a couple years ago with Replika. Because of legal problems, Replika disabled for a period of time the erotic roleplay module and people described their companions as though they had been lobotomized, that they had this relationship and then one day they didn’t anymore. With my project on the tanking of the soulmate app, many people in their reflection were like, “I’m never trusting AI companies again. I’m only going to have an AI companion if I can run it from my computer so I know that it will always be there.”
Benefits and Risks of AI Relationships
What are the benefits and risks of these relationships?
Banks: There’s a lot of talk about the risks and a little talk about benefits. But frankly, we are only just on the precipice of starting to have longitudinal data that might allow people to make causal claims. The headlines would have you believe that these are the end of mankind, that they’re going to make you commit suicide or abandon other humans. But much of those are based on these unfortunate, but uncommon situations.
Advertisement
Most scholars gave up technological determinism as a perspective a long time ago. In the communication sciences at least, we don’t generally assume that machines make us do something because we have some degree of agency in our interactions with technologies. Yet much of the fretting around potential risks is deterministic—AI companions make people delusional, make them suicidal, make them reject other relationships. A large number of people get real benefits from AI companions. They narrate experiences that are deeply meaningful to them. I think it’s irresponsible of us to discount those lived experiences.
When we think about concerns linking AI companions to loneliness, we don’t have much data that can support causal claims. Some studies suggest AI companions lead to loneliness, but other work suggests it reduces loneliness, and other work suggests that loneliness is what comes first. Social relatedness is one of our three intrinsic psychological needs, and if we don’t have that we will seek it out, whether it’s from a volleyball for a castaway, my dog, or an AI that will allow me to feel connected to something in my world.
Some people, and governments for that matter, may move toward a protective stance. For instance, there are problems around what gets done with your intimate data that you hand over to an agent owned and maintained by a company—that’s a very reasonable concern. Dealing with the potential for children to interact, where children don’t always navigate the boundaries between fiction and actuality. There are real, valid concerns. However, we need some balance in also thinking about what people are getting from it that’s positive, productive, healthy. Scholars need to make sure we’re being cautious about our claims based on our data. And human interactants need to educate themselves.
Jaime Banks holds a mechanical hand.Angela Ryan/Syracuse University
Why do you think that AI companions are becoming more popular now?
Advertisement
Banks: I feel like we had this perfect storm, if you will, of the maturation of large language models and coming out of COVID, where people had been physically and sometimes socially isolated for quite some time. When those conditions converged, we had on our hands a believable social agent at a time when people were seeking social connection. Outside of that, we are increasingly just not nice to one another. So, it’s not entirely surprising that if I just don’t like the people around me, or I feel disconnected, that I would try to find some other outlet for feeling connected.
More recently there’s been a shift to embodied companions, in desktop devices or other formats beyond chatbots. How does that change the relationship, if it does?
Banks: I’m part of a Facebook group about robotic companions and I watch how people talk, and it almost seems like it crosses this boundary between toy and companion. When you have a companion with a physical body, you are in some ways limited by the abilities of that body, whereas with digital-only AI, you have the ability to explore fantastic things—places that you would never be able to go with another physical entity, fantasy scenarios.
But in robotics, once we get into a space where there are bodies that are sophisticated, they become very expensive and that means that they are not accessible to a lot of people. That’s what I’m observing in many of these online groups. These toylike bodies are still accessible, but they are also quite limiting.
Advertisement
Do you have any favorite examples from popular culture to help explain AI companionship, either how it is now or how it could be?
Banks: I really enjoy a lot of the short fiction in Clarkesworld magazine, because the stories push me to think about what questions we might need to answer now to be prepared for a future hybrid society. Top of mind are the stories “Wanting Things,” “Seven Sexy Cowboy Robots,” and “Today I am Paul.” Outside of that, I’ll point to the game Cyberpunk 2077, because the character Johnny Silverhand complicates the norms for what counts as a machine and what counts as companionship.
Amazon-owned eero is selling a new add-on called eero Signal 4G LTE, a compact box meant to keep your home network online during internet outages. Plug it into a compatible eero router and your Wi-Fi can fall back to cellular data, so work calls, cameras, and smart home routines don’t instantly go dark.
There’s a catch, the cellular data is tied to an annual eero Plus plan managed in the eero app. The hardware by itself won’t provide the fallback connection, you’re also committing to eero’s service to actually use the backup.
It plugs in, then takes over
Signal connects over USB-C to any USB-C powered eero that supports Wi-Fi 6 or newer, plus eero PoE Gateway. It can share a single power adapter with the eero it’s attached to, which keeps the setup from turning into another pile of bricks and cables.
After you add it in the eero app, Signal stays in standby until your primary connection fails. When it does, Signal switches the whole network over to LTE, then drops back to standby once your ISP is back. No extra steps.
Advertisement
Where you place it matters because reception is everything. eero’s guidance is to pair Signal with the eero located where cell service is strongest, ideally higher up and closer to an exterior wall.
The subscription caveat
The backup connection runs through eero Plus, with two data tiers. The standard annual eero Plus plan includes up to 10GB of backup data per year, aimed at brief, occasional outages. New annual eero Plus subscribers who buy Signal get six months included, then the service renews at $99.99 for the next 12 months.
If you need more breathing room, eero Plus 100 includes up to 100GB of backup data per month. eero lists it at $99 for the first year (50% off), then it renews at $199.99 per year.
What to watch next
Signal is designed as a safety net at one address and it still expects a working primary internet connection most of the time, so it’s not a replacement for broadband. eero includes a three-year warranty and says Signal receives updates for security patches and new features.
Advertisement
Before you buy, check LTE strength where your router lives, then decide whether 10GB a year matches your typical outage pattern. If you can wait, eero says a 5G version is planned for later in 2026 with a $199.99 price.
Signal is available in the US for $99.99 on eero.com and Amazon.
Apple has reportedly delayed some of Siri’s AI features beyond iOS 26.4
These will apparently now land as part of iOS 26.5 or iOS 27
These features were first announced back in June 2024
Siri’s long-promised AI overhaul is becoming a huge embarrassment for Apple, as while this was initially announced back in June of 2024, at which point Apple said it would launch as part of iOS 18 that year, we’re now in 2026 and it still hasn’t arrived. Not only that, but it’s reportedly now being delayed even further.
We’d heard that it might finally arrive – at least in part – with iOS 26.4, which is expected to roll out soon, but now Apple watcher Mark Gurman, writing for Bloomberg (via 9to5Mac), has said that at least some of the features that were previously planned for iOS 26.4 will now ship with iOS 26.5, which is expected in May, and iOS 27, due in September, instead.
Gurman – who has a superb track record for Apple information – cites “people familiar with the matter”, and adds that the most likely features to slip are “voice-based control of in-app actions”, and “the expanded ability for Siri to tap into personal data,” which, as Gurman explains, “would let users ask the assistant to, say, search old text messages to locate a podcast shared by a friend and immediately play it.”
So if this is correct, Siri’s AI overhaul won’t get most of its core features until around two years after it was first announced, and parts that don’t arrive until iOS 27 will be a full two years later than Apple initially said to expect them.
(Image credit: Apple)
An unreasonably long wait
Even in isolation, this would be a ridiculously long delay, and one that’s not very fair on customers – including myself – who upgraded to iPhone 16-series phones in part down to the promise of these features.
But it gets even worse when you consider just how far ahead Android is when it comes to AI features, with Gemini having delivered much of what Apple is promising for Siri for years now.
Advertisement
In fact, Apple is so far behind that it seems to have – for the time being at least – essentially given up on trying to directly compete, and has instead inked a deal with Google to use Gemini as the brains behind Siri. But even with that deal in place, the wait goes on.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Apple is no stranger to embarrassments and failures, from ‘antennagate’ and ‘bendgate’ to the awful state Apple Maps launched in and the abandoned AirPower wireless charger, but none of these issues dragged on for quite as long as the current Siri debacle.
And not only is Siri miles behind the competition here, but even before AI emerged, Siri was generally considered less capable than rivals, so for whatever reason this is something Apple has struggled with in one way or another since the launch of Siri itself.
Advertisement
Hopefully, Siri will finally be competitive once this promised AI overhaul is delivered, but with the way things have been going so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets even further delayed.
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
For an easy and affordable way to turn your TV into a smart streaming hub, one of the top recommendations you’re going to hear is a Fire TV Stick. It doesn’t even matter if you have a Roku TV or other streaming OS built into your television. People get a Fire TV Stick because it does a better job integrating with smart homes, supports voice assistants, and streamlines all your movies, shows, music, and live TV into one easy-to-use place. Install is super easy because it’s just plug-and-play: just stick it into the HDMI port on the back of a TV, connect the power cable, and you’re good to go.
But the Fire TV Stick shouldn’t be limited to your house’s TV alone. This Amazon hardware is a lot more flexible than people realize. As it turns out, there are several other useful ways you can use one. No matter if you’re working with a Fire TV Stick HD, one of the 4k models of the Fire TV Stick, or one of Amazon’s other Fire TV offerings, we’ve rounded up four other compatible devices you can use a Fire TV Stick with.
Advertisement
Projectors
Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock
If you have a nice, big wall of open space in your house (or one of those backyard setups any neighbor would be jealous of), you might’ve already invested in a projector. They’re one of the most common alternatives to traditional TVs, and they do a great job giving you that movie theater experience from home. Turns out, they can also pair with a Fire TV Stick. Most modern projectors include at least one HDMI input, and that’s all the Fire TV Stick needs for video and audio output.
Once you get it connected, just find an outlet to plug the Fire TV Stick’s power cord into, and you’re all set to stream HD or 4k content. The Fire TV Stick HD supports resolutions up to 1080p at 60 frames per second, while the Fire TV Stick 4K Plus and its siblings can output up to 2160p with support for HDR formats like Dolby Vision and HDR10+. Combined with a compatible projector, you’ll easily be able to stream movies, live sports, or other content from the projector to the screen. If you’re planning on using it outside, just make sure your Wi-Fi signal can reach.
Advertisement
Computers
Tina Simakova/Getty Images
If you’re away from home, it’s nice knowing certain desktop displays and even laptops can support a Fire TV Stick. As long as it has an HDMI input that supports external devices, you’ll be able to plug it in and start streaming. Once it’s connected, the Fire TV Stick basically turns your monitor into a display separate from the computer’s operating system. This comes in handy in offices, dorm rooms, or work-from-home setups where a TV would be too big or too excessive for the space.
If you’re already strapped for space, don’t worry: The Fire TV Stick’s small size and low power requirements mean it won’t be a burden that clutters up your desktop setup. Pair some Bluetooth headphones to your computer, and you can enjoy some private listening as well. As a note: Not every laptop computer has an HDMI port, and of the ones that do, not all of them support HDMI input. Check your computer’s specs before committing.
Advertisement
Hotel room TVs
Pranithan Chorruangsak/Getty Images
On vacation or a work trip and can’t find anything good to watch on the hotel or Airbnb’s TV? You might want to remember to pack your Fire TV Stick next time. That way, you won’t have to bother with those limited channel selections, locked menus, or unreliable casting options and can just watch what you want to watch instead. As long as the hotel TV has an accessible HDMI port, your Fire TV Stick has space to shine. (Just don’t forget it when it comes time to check out.)
Some hotels and short-term rentals have started encouraging people to log into their personal streaming services on the place’s smart TV, but that’s a pain. Plus, you have to remember to log out before you leave. Using a Fire TV Stick instead means you just plug it in, sign into the Wi-Fi, and start streaming off your own apps without needing to fiddle with the hotel’s. And some good news: If your device supports 4k but the hotel’s TV doesn’t, the device will simply adjust to the resolution of the screen.
Advertisement
AV Receiver
Alexstepanov/Getty Images
If you have an AV receiver and really want to get the most out of your Fire TV Stick’s surround sound support, just plug it right into the receiver’s HDMI port. No need to plug it into the TV at all! Just cut out the middle man and go straight to the source. Plenty of modern receivers give you both HDMI inputs and outputs, meaning they’ll route video to your projector or TV while taking care of the audio separately. No extra hardware required.
The Fire TV Stick 4K Plus and Fire TV Stick 4K Max work especially well with AV receivers because of their Dolby Atmos support, not to mention the multi-channel audio pass-through and HDMI 2.1 features like ARC. The included Alexa Voice Remote might also be able to control certain receiver functions, including power and volume, depending on how smart your setup is. That said, a Fire TV Stick HD will work just fine in the receiver, too.
Water wells are simple things, but that doesn’t mean they are maintenance-free. It can be important to monitor water levels in a well, and that gets complicated when the well is remote. Commercial solutions exist, of course, but tend to be expensive and even impractical in some cases. That’s where [Hans Gaensbauer]’s low-cost, buoyancy-based well monitor comes in. An Engineers Without Border project, it not only cleverly measures water level in a simple way — logging to a text file on a USB stick in the process — but it’s so low-power that a single battery can run it for years.
The steel cable (bottom left) is attached to a submerged length of pipe, and inside the cylinder is a custom load cell. The lower the water level, the higher the apparent weight of the submerged pipe.
The monitor [Hans] designed works in the following way: suspend a length of pipe inside the well, and attach that pipe to a load cell. The apparent weight of the pipe will be directly proportional to how much of the pipe is above water. The fuller the well, the less the pipe will seem to weigh. It’s very clever, requires nothing to be in the well that isn’t already water-safe, and was designed so that the electronics sit outside in a weatherproof enclosure. Cost comes out to about $25 each, which compares pretty favorably to the $1000+ range of industrial sensors.
The concept is clever, but it took more that that to create a workable solution. For one thing, space was an issue. The entire well cap was only six inches in diameter, most of which was already occupied. [Hans] figured he had only about an inch to work with, but he made it work by designing a custom load cell out of a piece of aluminum with four strain gauges bonded to it. The resulting sensor is narrow, and sits within a nylon and PTFE tube that mounts vertically to the top of the well cap. Out from the bottom comes a steel cable that attaches to the submerged tube, and out the top comes a cable that brings the signals to the rest of the electronics in a separate enclosure. More details on the well monitor are in the project’s GitHub repository.
All one has to do after it’s installed is swap out the USB stick to retrieve readings, and every once in a long while change the battery. It sure beats taking manual sensor readings constantly, like meteorologists did back in WWII.