The National Guard soldiers in desert camo piled out of unmarked vans in East Los Angeles last June, cordoning off East Sixth Street, a residential street lined with single family houses, and blocking a nearby road leading to an elementary school.
A squad of federal agents moved in flinging flash-bang grenades — explosives designed to disorient — into a small home before storming inside. They’d come for Alejandro Orellana, a Marine Corps veteran and UPS employee accused of being a central figure in a secret confederacy of insurrectionists. A news video had shown the 30-year-old distributing water, food and face shields to people protesting the Trump administration’s immigration roundups in Los Angeles.
Advertisement
Bill Essayli, a former state legislator who leads the federal prosecutor’s office in Los Angeles, joined the raid along with a Fox News crew.
With cameras rolling, Orellana, his parents and brothers were led out in handcuffs as agents searched their home.
On Fox News, Essayli, sporting a blue FBI windbreaker, hyped the arrest of Orellana, a quiet, wiry man with a long mane of coal-black hair. “It appears they’re well-orchestrated and coordinated, and well-funded,” he said. “And today was one of the first arrests — first key arrests — that we did.”
Essayli would charge Orellana with conspiracy — under a federal statute typically used to build cases against drug traffickers and organized crime — and with aiding and abetting civil disorder.
Advertisement
Within weeks, the prosecutor’s marquee case would quietly fall apart. Agents who searched Orellana’s house found little that could be considered incriminating, and prosecutors never charged anyone else as part of the supposed conspiracy. By late July, they moved to have the charges dismissed.
It wouldn’t be the only such case.
Over the past 10 months, President Donald Trump’s administration has made much of its success in sweeping through U.S. cities, capturing unauthorized immigrants and arresting people who publicly oppose the operations, routinely accusing dissenters of being domestic terrorists or extremists. Federal agents have arrested hundreds of U.S. citizens like Orellana — including protesters, activists observing the immigration enforcement operations, bystanders and, in some cases, the family members of people targeted for deportation.
Less clear to the public is what has happened to those charged.
Advertisement
To find out, ProPublica and FRONTLINE combed through social media, court records and news stories. Reporters identified more than 300 protesters and bystanders who were arrested by federal agents during immigration sweeps and were accused of crimes such as assaulting or interfering with law enforcement.
But over and over those accusations fell apart under scrutiny. Our reviews of court files found that statements made by the arresting officers were repeatedly debunked by video footage. In more than a third of the cases, prosecutors quickly dismissed charges that couldn’t be substantiated, refused to file charges at all, or lost at trial. The tally of cases that end this way will likely climb as many of the arrests remain unresolved.
“What’s happening now is not comparable to anything that’s happened in the past,” said
Cuauhtémoc Ortega, the chief federal defender for the Central District of California, who personally represented Orellana and other protesters. “We’ve never had a situation where it seems like you arrest first and then try to justify the reasons for the arrests later.”
Advertisement
The Department of Homeland Security, which includes Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on the arrests and declined to answer detailed questions from ProPublica and FRONTLINE.
But in a statement in response to an earlier story, DHS said, “The First Amendment protects speech and peaceful assembly — not rioting. DHS is taking reasonable and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers.”
Watch FRONTLINE and ProPublica’s Documentary: “Caught in the Crackdown”
Advertisement
Given the unprecedented nature of the urban sweeps, it is difficult to compare the rate of failed cases to another time period or context. But current and former federal prosecutors and other legal experts said having that number of arrests come to nothing is particularly striking in the federal system, where U.S. attorneys usually secure convictions or guilty pleas in more than 90% of the cases they bring; only 8.2% of federal criminal cases were dismissed in 2022, according to data compiled by that court system.
The failures highlight the challenges of sending large numbers of federal agents into major cities to conduct roving immigration sweeps: They aren’t accustomed to dealing with crowds of angry protesters
Border Patrol agents are typically stationed at the border where their day-to-day work entails scooping up people who have crossed illegally. ICE agents, who often work in urban settings, had little prior experience handling hostile crowds. And FBI agents, who have aided in the immigration sweeps, would normally spend months or years painstakingly amassing evidence before making arrests.
That lack of experience in street policing and crowd control, coupled with the Trump administration’s demand for huge numbers of deportations, led agents to make a wave of unjustified arrests, legal experts say.
Advertisement
To be sure, protesters have often engaged in hostile behavior, hurling expletives, getting in agents’ faces and occasionally becoming violent. A woman in Minnesota is accused of biting off part of an agent’s finger during a scuffle after the killing of Alex Pretti in late January; in Los Angeles, an officer outside an immigration detention facility suffered a dislocated finger after a protester allegedly grabbed his bulletproof vest and shook him.
“The agents, they don’t know how to operate in these situations,” said Christy Lopez, a former Justice Department attorney who spent years investigating misconduct by law enforcement. Their behavior, she said, “is on par with the worst protest policing and just law enforcement that I’ve seen from any department, even in their worst days.
In its earlier statement, DHS said that “rioters and terrorists” have repeatedly attacked immigration agents, but ICE and Customs and Border Protection personnel “are trained to use the minimum amount of force necessary to resolve dangerous situations to prioritize the safety of the public and themselves.”
Advertisement
The arrests are not without consequence. Even unsuccessful prosecutions can be costly and emotionally taxing for defendants, said Jared Fishman, a former career prosecutor in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division. The aggressive tactics of the agents and the gleeful social media posts by DHS accusing protesters of serious crimes, Fishman said, affect people’s willingness to publicly challenge the mass deportation policies.
“If the goal of the Trump administration is to keep people out of the streets, then it doesn’t matter if the people are getting convicted,” said Fishman, now the executive director of the Justice Innovation Lab, a nonprofit focused on creating a more equitable and effective justice system. “I’m sure it’s having a chilling effect.”
After reviewing data and some court records for ProPublica and FRONTLINE, Fishman said, “The numbers seem to indicate a pattern and practice of illegal arrests.”
“We Must Identify Him”
The crackdown on protesters began in June of 2025, when the Department of Homeland Security launched its wave of major immigration sweeps in Southern California. The campaign was led by Gregory Bovino, a veteran Border Patrol chief who normally presided over a remote stretch of sand and scrub deep in the state’s Imperial Valley.
Advertisement
Bovino from the start encouraged his agents to shut down or arrest protesters.
“Arrest as many people that touch you as you want to. Those are the general orders, all the way to the top,” Bovino told his officers, footage from an agent’s body-worn camera shows. “Everybody fucking gets it if they touch you.”
He went on to remind them that their actions should be “legal, ethical, moral” while encouraging them to use so-called less lethal weapons on protesters.
“We’re gonna look at shipping tractor trailers full of that shit in here,” he said.
Bovino’s aggressive tactics sparked intense opposition from Angelenos, including those gathered in the streets in front of the sprawling federal office complex in downtown Los Angeles on June 9.
That day Orellana drove his Ford F-150 pickup truck loaded with bottled water, snacks and cardboard boxes containing Uvex brand face shields — clear plastic masks designed to protect industrial workers from flying debris and chemical splashes — to the protest.
When he arrived in front of the federal building, another person hopped into the bed and began handing out the supplies to protesters gathered outside the entrance.
Advertisement
Orellana told FRONTLINE and ProPublica that he decided to help distribute the supplies after watching federal agents fire tear gas and rubber bullets into crowds at an earlier demonstration.
“A bunch of us took it upon ourselves to, you know, go downtown and give out these resources — the food, water and of course the PPE,” he said, referring to personal protective equipment.
Video and photos quickly made their way onto social media. An X user with more than 30,000 followers posted a photo of Orellana. “A photograph of the man delivering boxes of gas masks to the rioters has emerged,” wrote the poster. “We must identify him, so we can track down who is funding this coordinated attack.”
From there the thread was picked up by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who has a vast audience on the platform. Jones, who repeatedly claimed that financier and philanthropist George Soros was funding the protests, eventually named Orellana as the driver of the pickup. More than two million people saw the post.
Advertisement
Within 48 hours, the soldiers and federal agents arrived to arrest Orellana.
Over the next five months, they arrested more than one hundred U.S. citizens in Los Angeles and other cities in Southern California — most of them demonstrators — charging them with assaulting federal law enforcement personnel or interfering with agents’ activities. Others were accused of damaging government property. At least 16, like Orellana, were charged with conspiracy, which can carry a sentence of up to six years in prison.
ProPublica and FRONTLINE found that more than a third of those cases crumbled. In eight instances, juries acquitted defendants at trial. But more frequently, prosecutors dropped charges when the claims made by immigration officers and agents didn’t match video evidence or other inconsistencies emerged. In several cases, prosecutors declined to file charges at all.
There have been some successful prosecutions: 32 of the 116 people whose arrests in California we reviewed have been convicted, many pleading guilty to misdemeanor charges. And in late February, jurors convicted two activists on stalking charges after they livestreamed themselves following an immigration agent to his home; the pair were acquitted of conspiracy.
Advertisement
Today 38 cases are still pending.
Essayli has stated on social media that his office brought more than 100 cases and secured convictions in more than half of them. When asked about the discrepancy between his claims and the data compiled by ProPublica and FRONTLINE, he declined to comment.
“The U.S. attorney’s office does not lose cases because they’re bad lawyers,” said Carley Palmer, who spent eight years as a federal prosecutor in the office Essayli now runs. “They are excellent trial attorneys. So if they’re losing a case, it may mean that the evidence isn’t there, or it may mean that the community doesn’t believe it should be a federal crime.”
Palmer, who is now in private practice, said the glut of protest and low-level criminal immigration cases have shifted resources away from the complex prosecutions the DOJ is uniquely equipped to handle: environmental crimes, public corruption, financial fraud, cyberscams, civil rights violations.
Advertisement
Essayli declined to be interviewed for this story or an accompanying FRONTLINE documentary set to air Tuesday. He was appointed by the Trump administration in early 2025, but he has never been confirmed by the Senate, raising ongoing questions about the legality of his role as top prosecutor for the region. His office did not respond to detailed questions sent by email.
Like Orellana, Julian Pecora Cardenas, 31, was charged with conspiracy last summer after following a convoy of federal agents in his car.
On the morning of July 5, Pecora Cardenas followed vans full of Border Patrol agents after they left a Coast Guard station in San Pedro, south of Los Angeles, livestreaming their movements on Instagram. “It’s every citizen’s duty to conduct oversight of their government,” he said. “I was within my First Amendment rights.”
After roughly 30 minutes, the agents stopped, pulled Pecora Cardenas from his Hyundai and slammed him to the pavement. “I honestly thought it was going to be like a George Floyd moment,” Pecora Cardenas recalled in an interview, alleging that multiple agents pinned him to the asphalt with their knees. He suffered a concussion, needed stitches over his left eye and wore an orthopedic collar to stabilize his injured neck.
Advertisement
Federal prosecutors charged Pecora Cardenas and another activist with conspiracy to impede the federal agents, saying that they “were illegally maneuvering their vehicles through traffic, stop lights, and stop signs to stay behind the agent’s vehicles,” that they tried to block the Border Patrol vehicles, and that they created “hazardous conditions on the road.”
Pecora Cardenas’ own video of the day’s events told a different story. The footage, which ProPublica and FRONTLINE have reviewed, contradicts the claims that the men had interfered with the agents. Within days of seeing the images, Essayli’s office jettisoned the charges “in the interest of justice.”
Pecora Cardenas hasn’t tried to observe federal agents or participate in a protest since his arrest. “I don’t want to be assaulted again. I don’t want to wind up back in federal prison for something that I didn’t do.”
“They Were Just Randomly Grabbing People”
When Bovino, the Border Patrol chief, left California and took his forces to Illinois last fall, their focus on protesters intensified.
Advertisement
In roughly one month, federal agents arrested more than a hundred American citizens, many of them activists participating in demonstrations or documenting the movements of immigration agents as their convoys of rented SUVs rolled through the streets of Chicago and surrounding communities.
On the morning of Oct. 3, 2025, about two hundred demonstrators gathered near the ICE facility in Broadview, a small town in the western suburbs of Chicago. Tucked away in a quiet industrial park, the nondescript building had become the locus of ongoing protests since Bovino and his forces had arrived in Illinois.
Then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, accompanied by a DHS video team, was on site that day wearing a baseball cap and a black ballistic vest.
Advertisement
Also present was Benny Johnson, a prominent podcaster and online influencer who is close to the Trump administration. Johnson, who had brought his own camera crew to shoot video for his YouTube channel and other social media accounts, was effectively embedded with Noem, Bovino and the immigration agents.
At about 9 a.m., Bovino and a phalanx of heavily armed agents in combat gear began striding down Harvard Street toward the protesters. “Walk slowly,” Bovino told his men.
Without a bullhorn or any sort of amplification, Bovino informed the crowd that they were being dispersed. Then he and his colleagues began shoving people to the ground and arresting them.
In a matter of minutes, a dozen protesters had been handcuffed. Three arrestees interviewed by ProPublica and FRONTLINE told us they were confused because they’d been standing in a “free speech zone” set up by state officials.
Advertisement
“I felt somebody grab my shoulder and pull me to the ground,” said Juan Muñoz, a business owner and elected leader in nearby Oak Park Township. “And once I fell onto my back, that’s when I saw it was Greg Bovino.”
Kyle Frankovich, a Harvard data scientist and Chicago resident, was also arrested. “They were just randomly grabbing people,” he recalled. “There was nowhere to go, people were falling all over the place, and several of the people they arrested simply had the misfortune of tripping over all of the other protesters” as federal agents surged into the crowd.
Frankovich said FBI agents who questioned him asked who had paid for him to participate in the demonstration and who “covered the transportation cost for you to be here today.”
Johnson’s video team and a DHS camera crew filmed the arrested protesters as they were lined up outside the ICE building, while Noem looked on. DHS posted photos of Frankovich in handcuffs on X and Facebook with the message, “We will NOT allow violent activist to lay hands on our law enforcement.”
Advertisement
Johnson, who has more than more than 4 million followers on X and more than 6 million subscribers on YouTube, posted a video on X panning across the arrested protesters and wrote: “I saw dozens of Democrat domestic terrorists arrested today for VIOLENT ASSAULT on federal law enforcement. Every activist here attacked ICE agents in broad daylight just for enforcing American law.” He made the same claim in a nearly 13-minute-long YouTube video.
Such social media content had become a central feature of the Trump administration’s deportation campaign. DHS, Border Patrol and a raft of allied social media influencers regularly produced slick videos showing agents in action: riding in helicopters, striding through city streets clutching rifles, breaking down doors, and apprehending immigrants and activists.
But on that day in Chicago, DHS had strayed far from the facts. And so had Johnson, a 38-year-old former journalist who turned to social media after being embroiled in plagiarism scandals at BuzzFeed and the Independent Journal Review.
After about eight hours in custody, Frankovich, Muñoz and nearly all the others were released without charges. In the end, only one person would be prosecuted.
Advertisement
Neither DHS nor Johnson have taken the posts down. Johnson did not respond to emailed requests for comment.
The lone person charged with a crime that day was Cole Sheridan, who was accused of attacking Bovino and sending him to the hospital with an injured groin muscle.
Sheridan spent three and a half days in jail — “probably the most unpleasant thing I’ve ever had to experience,” he said in an interview with FRONTLINE and ProPublica — before being released.
In court, a prosecutor said that Sheridan had thrown a punch at Bovino and pushed him, transcripts show.
Advertisement
The evidence presented by the Justice Department, though, was slim. Bovino didn’t wear a body camera, so prosecutors relied on video from the body camera of Border Patrol agent Jason Epperson. But it didn’t show Sheridan assaulting anyone — though he did call Bovino “a fucking idiot.” In statements to investigators, Bovino and Epperson had offered conflicting accounts of the encounter.
About a month after Sheridan was arrested, prosecutors moved to dismiss the case after a bystander video surfaced showing clearly that Sheridan hadn’t assaulted Bovino.
“I don’t know if I’ve ever experienced something truly that bizarre and absurd as, like, seeing a law enforcement agent concoct a narrative to arrest me, to press charges against me,” said Sheridan, who describes himself as intensely private and was initially reluctant to talk publicly about his arrest. “That was extremely unnerving.”
He remains worried that he’ll be harassed or even physically attacked because of the inflammatory social media posts about him. “What a farce. Every element of it felt staged,” he said.
Advertisement
In a statement to ProPublica and FRONTLINE, Chicago U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros said, “Our willingness to be open-minded and dismiss cases — or not file charges in the first place — reflects our commitment to do the right thing even in those cases where a crime was committed and the conduct in question clearly falls outside any protected First Amendment activity.” He declined to comment directly on Sheridan’s case.
FRONTLINE and ProPublica showed video of Sheridan’s arrest to Lopez, the former Justice Department attorney. “It’s just a gross abuse of power,” she said. “And we’ve almost normalized that this is how federal law enforcement behaves now. They just arrest people.”
Of the 109 arrests that ProPublica and FRONTLINE documented in the Chicago area, federal prosecutors dropped charges in at least 75 cases.
Felony Charges Downgraded
When Bovino and his forces arrived in North Carolina last November, they were greeted by protesters opposed to the deportation sweeps, as they had been in previous cities.
Advertisement
Heather Morrow was one of them. She had joined a small group of demonstrators, chanting and banging on metal dishes outside an immigration facility in Charlotte when ICE officers confronted the group.
They handcuffed Morrow, 45, and another activist, stuffed them in the back of a federal vehicle and, according to Morrow, kept them there for hours before finally taking her to jail.
“I was so traumatized,” Morrow, a school bus driver and dog boarder, said in an interview. “I didn’t expect them to be so overly aggressive. I really showed up there expecting conversation, making them come to their senses.”
After a full day and night in custody, she was released to face federal felony assault charges. A Department of Justice press release accused her of attacking an ICE officer just as he showed up for his work shift, grabbing his shoulders and trying to jump on his back.
Advertisement
But a shaky phone video circulating on social media showed what appeared to be a very different scene. In it, an officer comes from behind and abruptly tackles Morrow to the pavement. The video doesn’t show her assaulting anyone.
When prosecutors saw the video, they dumped the felony charges. But they promptly filed a new misdemeanor case against Morrow and the other activist, alleging the pair impeded ICE officers and failed to follow their orders. It took a month for Morrow to get her phone back from federal custody, while her other confiscated possessions, including her keys, have been lost, Morrow’s attorney said. Because she’s on pretrial probation, the federal government has seized her passport. Morrow has pleaded not guilty, and her case is ongoing.
In Handcuffs and Intimidated
In early January, Bovino arrived in Minneapolis with his social media team. Within weeks, two activists — Renee Good and Alex Pretti — were shot and killed by immigration agents. The Trump administration immediately portrayed Good as an extremist; Bovino claimed that Pretti was planning to kill federal personnel when he was shot to death.
The killings, which sparked national outcry, would prompt the administration to recalibrate. By Jan. 26, Bovino had been demoted and sent back to his home station in the California desert.
Advertisement
But immigration agents continued to roam the Twin Cities, and activists continued to get arrested.
Civil rights attorneys from around the country gathered in a Minneapolis conference room on Jan. 30 to discuss those arrests.
During a break for lunch, Jon Feinberg, president of the National Police Accountability Project, stepped out of the room and spoke to reporters. “To be charged with a federal crime is something that is life-altering,” said Feinberg, who is based in Philadelphia. “The consequences of being accused and possibly convicted of a federal offense are devastating, especially when people have not engaged in criminal conduct from any reasonable person’s perspective.”
ProPublica and FRONTLINE have identified nearly 80 arrests stemming from the Minnesota immigration sweeps. Most of the cases are still ongoing, though a handful have been dismissed.
Advertisement
Daniel Rosen, the U.S. attorney for Minnesota, did not respond to requests for comment.
One of those arrested was Rebecca Ringstrom, who lives in Blaine, a quiet suburb north of Minneapolis.
Ringstrom, 42, is a member of an activist group that tracks immigration agents as they move around Blaine. “There was a vehicle with four agents inside that I could see. All four were in tactical gear,” she said in an interview with ProPublica and FRONTLINE. “I was able to look at the plate and see that it was a confirmed ICE vehicle.”
Behind the wheel of her Kia, she began following them; Ringstrom insists her driving was safe and lawful. But in a matter of minutes, she’d been arrested and accused of interfering with federal law enforcement.
Advertisement
Ringstrom said an agent at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, where she was briefly held after her arrest, said he wished he’d arrested her — because he would’ve made the experience more unpleasant and violent. “There was no reason to say that. I’m already here. I’m in handcuffs. It’s just a way to intimidate,” she recalled.
She was charged with interfering with a federal agent and issued a notice of violation — essentially a ticket — for the misdemeanor offense. Since then, Ringstrom has lined up a pro bono lawyer, but she has also lost her job, “likely due to the ongoing coverage” of her arrest.
She is scheduled to make her first court appearance later this month.
During an investor call following the release of AMD’s first-quarter 2026 earnings, CEO Lisa Su confirmed that the Epyc Venice processors remain on schedule for launch later this year. The server CPUs will mark the debut of the Zen 6 architecture and AMD’s first move to TSMC’s 2nm process technology. Read Entire Article Source link
A leader in almost everything tech and home-office related for over 40 years, Swiss-founded Logitech offers a vast array of products, including keyboards, consoles, webcams, and tech gear made especially for education, business, and gaming. We at WIRED know the company’s wares well (obviously), so we’ve found the latest Logitech promo codes and deals to save on any type of tech purchase.
Logitech makes seriously great Bluetooth keyboards, keyboard cases, and smart pencils that made our Best iPad Accessories list. We also named the Logitech Pro X 2 the best gaming headset in our wireless headphones guide. If you want to keep the spirit of playfulness alive, fellow F1 enthusiast (and senior editor of product reviews) Parker Hall raved about Logitech’s high-tech wheel, pedals, and seat racing simulation set to help you become the Lewis Hamilton of your gaming fantasies. Check out these Logitech discounts we’ve found to help you ball (technologically) on a budget.
Get a Free Gift With Select Purchases at Logitech
Right now, Logitech wants to reward you for choosing them, with tons of free gifts with select purchases at Logitech. These Logitech deals include major savings, like a free Logitech Desk Mat when you buy any two Ergo Products, ($23 value), or a free Logitech Accessory Case when you purchase a Crayon & Combo Touch Case ($30 value). There are tons of savings on accessories, like a free Wooden Headset Stand when you buy a qualifying Logitech Zone Headset, ($40 value), or a free MX Keyboard Sleeve when you purchase a qualifying MX Mini Keyboard ($30 value). Plus, you can claim a free 6-month Perplexity Pro membership, worth $120, when you buy an eligible MX Series, Ergo Series, or iPad Keyboard case over $119.
Save up to $100 On Refurbished Premium Gear
The Logitech outlet is one of the best ways to save big on your important tech purchases on premium gear with exclusive gear. With the outlet, you’ll find like-new refurbished devices and limited-time favorites to shop before they’re gone forever (so be sure to check often and act soon!). Some of the best deals we’ve seen so far include: $50 off a refurbished X56 HOTAS VR flight simulator controller, $60 off a refurbished G715 wireless gaming keyboard, and $20 off a refurbished Folio Touch for iPad Air and Pro models.
Advertisement
Tips and Tricks for More Logitech Discounts
Even if you don’t have a promo code on hand, Logitech has plenty of ways to save, with free shipping on orders of $29 or more (a super-easy mark to hit). Many products also qualify for a gift with purchase, so take advantage of a free MX travel case, keyboard sleeve, or 1 month of Adobe Creative Cloud. And for a limited time, when you buy one product, you can get a second for 25% off.
With an array of helpful products for students, Logitech is making it easier to get all this game-changing tech. Students can get a 25% discount on products after registering and verifying their student status with UNiDAYS.
{Logitech 20% Off: Students & Heroes
Logitech wants to benefit as many people as it can, with a 20% discount for some of our most valuable community members who can benefit from this important, but sometimes pricey tech. That’s why Logitech is offering a 20% Logitech promo code discount of 20% off for heroes and students—this includes students, teachers, medical professionals, military, and first responders. Just verify your status to get the Logitech discount code.
25% Off Logitech Gaming Gear
Logitech G Play Days sales event is a celebration of all things gaming. During the Logitech G Play Days sales event, you’ll save with exclusive promotions and score 25% off select gear for a limited time. So whether you (or a friend) is in need of a new gaming headset or wants to upgrade your keyboard, there’s gear (and discounts) for every type of gamer.
Advertisement
Shop Trending Logitech Products
As mentioned, Logitech has nearly every type of tech product needed for productivity in your office or school, but also has some really innovative tech products for home and gaming. Looking to get serious about your WFH (or gaming) setup? Logitech’s MX Keys S Advanced Wireless Illuminated Keyboard is a bestseller because of its portability, ergonomic design, and cheap price point. The bestselling MX Vertical Advanced Ergonomic Mouse is occasionally discounted, so save your hand the cramps and carpal tunnel (while saving some coin, too).
In Polymarket’s prediction market, “most people end up losing money,” reports the Washington Post — typically a few bucks.
“Since Polymarket launched in 2022, a few thousand people have lost the bulk of the money… and an even smaller group — .05 percent of users — has gone home with most of the overall profits, according to a new analysis from finance researcher Pat Akey and colleagues.”
A lot of users aren’t that good at predicting the future. They’re losing money at roughly the same rate as online gamblers betting on sports and other real-life events at traditional sportsbooks, according to the U.K. gambling regulator’s analysis of 2024 data. On Polymarket, the odds of making a profit are slightly higher on weather and tech markets — and a little lower on sports…
On Polymarket, just 1,200 people took more than half the profits — $591 million, or more than $100,000 each. [“The top 1% of users capture 76.5% of all trading gains,” the researchers write.] When you dabble in prediction markets, you’re competing against these sophisticated players who consistently win. Most of those 1,200 big winners didn’t place just a few smart bets. They appear to be pros making thousands of trades, mostly in the past year and a half, that were probably automated. One user made $3 million since January on more than a million trades about the Oscars, according to TRM Labs…
Advertisement
The most profitable participants are also just good at picking what to bet on, Akey found, winning so often it was statistically unlikely to be dumb luck. They had some sort of edge — expertise, deep research or, perhaps, inside knowledge. “Our results suggest that the informational benefits of prediction markets come at a cost to unsophisticated participants,” the researchers conclude.
A new NYT Connections puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Sunday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Connections hints and answers for Sunday, May 10 (game #1064).
Good morning! Let’s play Connections, the NYT’s clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need Connections hints.
What should you do once you’ve finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I’ve also got daily Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too, while Marc’s Wordle today page covers the original viral word game.
Advertisement
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Latest Videos From
NYT Connections today (game #1065) – today’s words
(Image credit: New York Times)
Today’s NYT Connections words are…
Advertisement
COLOR
CREEP
SHANDY
KARMA
KNIVES OUT
SLIP
PYRAMID
RHYME
STEAL
CHINATOWN
KEYED
SNEAK
SEVEN
PONZI
ELEGY
VERTIGO
NYT Connections today (game #1065) – hint #1 – group hints
What are some clues for today’s NYT Connections groups?
BLUE: Crime films
GREEN: Types of plan
YELLOW: Move slowly without being seen
PURPLE: Hidden anatomy
Need more clues?
We’re firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today’s NYT Connections puzzles…
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Advertisement
NYT Connections today (game #1065) – hint #2 – group answers
What are the answers for today’s NYT Connections groups?
BLUE: DETECTIVE MOVIES
GREEN: KINDS OF SCHEMES
YELLOW: MOVE STEALTHILY, WITH “IN”
PURPLE: BODY PARTS SURROUNDED BY TWO LETTERS
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
NYT Connections today (game #1065) – the answers
(Image credit: New York Times)
The answers to today’s Connections, game #1065, are…
YELLOW: MOVE STEALTHILY, WITH “IN” CREEP, SLIP, SNEAK, STEAL
GREEN: KINDS OF SCHEMES COLOR, PONZI, PYRAMID, RHYME
BLUE: DETECTIVE MOVIES CHINATOWN, KNIVES OUT, SEVEN, VERTIGO
PURPLE: BODY PARTS SURROUNDED BY TWO LETTERS ELEGY, KARMA, KEYED, SHANDY
My rating: Easy
My score: Perfect
Today’s purple group looks a lot more gettable than normal and I’m annoyed at myself for not taking more time over today’s game. Congratulations if you saw the four BODY PARTS SURROUNDED BY TWO LETTERS.
Instead, I rushed in spotting the four DETECTIVE MOVIES — not that I saw the link at first, just that they are all great films.
Next, PONZI could only be here for one thing, although I did hesitate over the fourth tile, getting caught up in thinking SLIP scheme could be something as well as SLIP stream.
Advertisement
With just eight tiles left CREEP, SLIP, SNEAK, and STEAL were impossible to resist.
Yesterday’s NYT Connections answers (Sunday, May 10, game #1064)
YELLOW: MUSIC PLAYER BUTTONS PLAY, REPEAT, SHUFFLE, SKIP
GREEN: DESTINED BOUND, CERTAIN, FATED, SURE
BLUE: VERBS IN MAKING A MOJITO GARNISH, MUDDLE, POUR, STIR
PURPLE: WHAT “SPRING” MIGHT REFER TO COIL, FOUNTAIN, LEAP, SEASON
What is NYT Connections?
NYT Connections is one of several increasingly popular word games made by the New York Times. It challenges you to find groups of four items that share something in common, and each group has a different difficulty level: green is easy, yellow a little harder, blue often quite tough and purple usually very difficult.
On the plus side, you don’t technically need to solve the final one, as you’ll be able to answer that one by a process of elimination. What’s more, you can make up to four mistakes, which gives you a little bit of breathing room.
Advertisement
It’s a little more involved than something like Wordle, however, and there are plenty of opportunities for the game to trip you up with tricks. For instance, watch out for homophones and other word games that could disguise the answers.
It’s playable for free via the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
A new NYT Strands puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Sunday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Strands hints and answers for Sunday, May 10 (game #798).
Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.
Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.
Advertisement
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Latest Videos From
NYT Strands today (game #799) – hint #1 – today’s theme
What is the theme of today’s NYT Strands?
• Today’s NYT Strands theme is… A nice medley
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #799) – hint #2 – clue words
Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.
DRIES
GAPE
MULES
BEND
STIR
SOAR
NYT Strands today (game #799) – hint #3 – spangram letters
How many letters are in today’s spangram?
• Spangram has 11 letters
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #799) – hint #4 – spangram position
What are two sides of the board that today’s spangram touches?
First side: left, 5th row
Last side: bottom, 3rd column
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
NYT Strands today (game #799) – the answers
(Image credit: New York Times)
The answers to today’s Strands, game #799, are…
JUMBLE
HODGEPODGE
VARIETY
MISHMASH
RAGBAG
SPANGRAM: ODDSANDENDS
My rating: Easy
My score: Perfect
After struggling to see yesterday’s blatantly obvious words I roared through today’s messy selection — all of which probably says a lot about my brain and/or my organizational skills.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Advertisement
I really love all of these words and personally I think they sum up the glorious VARIETY and reality of life, where nothing is in straight lines or ordered and everything comes at you in a MISHMASH.
I also really enjoyed how today’s words revealed themselves to me, with the spangram slowly becoming obvious after I solved the words surrounding it.
Advertisement
Yesterday’s NYT Strands answers (Sunday, May 10, game #798)
OVERT
BRAZEN
GLARING
BLATANT
OBVIOUS
FLAGRANT
SPANGRAM: CLEARCUT
What is NYT Strands?
Strands is the NYT’s not-so-new-any-more word game, following Wordle and Connections. It’s now a fully fledged member of the NYT’s games stable that has been running for a year and which can be played on the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
I’ve got a full guide to how to play NYT Strands, complete with tips for solving it, so check that out if you’re struggling to beat it each day.
For as many speakers as someone can cram into a surround sound system, humans still (generally) only have two ears to listen to those sounds with. This means that, for recording purposes, it’s possible to create incredibly vivid three-dimensional sounds with just two microphones, provided that there’s an actual physical replica of a human ear attached to each microphone. This helps ensure that all the qualities of the sounds are preserved in a way a real human would experience them, and as [David Green] demonstrates, these systems don’t need to be very expensive.
This build doesn’t just use models of human ears for recording sounds through. The silicone ears are mounted on a styrofoam mannequin head as well, which provides some sound isolation between the two microphones, much like a real human head. The ears are mounted in appropriate locations with the microphones installed inside, and the entire microphone apparatus is positioned on a PVC rig with a camera so that binaural audio will be recorded for anything [David] points it at.
Although he had some issues interfacing two microphones using 19th-century technology instead of soldering everything together, the build still eventually came together, and only for around $70 USD. However, this build is a bit dated now, so prices may have changed by now. It’s still a great way to produce realistic stereo sound without breaking the bank, but it’s not the only way of getting this job done.
A developer has built a remarkably thin computer that is almost the same size and thickness as a standard credit card, potentially opening the door to a new category of ultra-portable computing devices.
Called the “Muxcard,” the experimental device combines a fully functional microcomputer, wireless connectivity, NFC support, sensors, and an E Ink display into a body measuring just 1mm thick – thin enough to fit inside a regular wallet alongside bank cards. The project, created by GitHub user “krauseler,” has quickly drawn attention from the maker and hardware enthusiast community for pushing the physical limits of compact electronics.
A tiny computer designed to fit in your wallet
Despite its slim form factor, the Muxcard includes surprisingly capable hardware. The device is powered by an ESP32-C3 microcontroller and integrates a 1.54-inch flexible E Ink display, NFC hardware, an IMU motion sensor, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity, and a miniature lithium-polymer battery.
Muxcardkrauseler/Github
The engineering challenge was not simply shrinking components, but making them durable enough to survive everyday bending and pressure inside a wallet. According to project details shared online, the creator used flexible PCBs and carefully separated sensitive components into “islands” connected through bend-tolerant sections to reduce mechanical stress.
One of the biggest hurdles involved integrating the E Ink display into such a thin device. Traditional connectors were reportedly too bulky, forcing the creator to hand-solder connections directly onto the display flex cable. Power management also became a major challenge because ultra-thin batteries offer extremely limited capacity.
Advertisement
Why this matters beyond a DIY project
At first glance, the Muxcard may seem like a niche experiment for hobbyists. However, the project reflects a broader trend toward invisible and ambient computing – devices becoming smaller, thinner, and more seamlessly integrated into everyday objects.
Muxcardkrauseler/Github
The use of an E Ink screen is particularly important because it consumes almost no power while displaying static information, allowing the card to remain functional for longer periods despite its tiny battery. The low-power design could make devices like this suitable for secure identification, digital business cards, two-factor authentication systems, event passes, or minimalist smart home controls.
For consumers, projects like the Muxcard offer a glimpse into how future computing devices may evolve beyond phones and wearables into objects people already carry every day.
What comes next
The Muxcard remains an experimental open-source project rather than a commercial product. However, the hardware files and firmware have already been published online for non-commercial use, meaning developers and enthusiasts can attempt to build their own versions.
As flexible electronics, thin batteries, and low-power displays continue improving, concepts like the Muxcard could eventually influence future digital IDs, secure authentication tools, and ultra-portable computing devices.
A new Linux zero-day exploit, named Dirty Frag, allows local attackers to gain root privileges on most major Linux distributions with a single command.
Security researcher Hyunwoo Kim, who disclosed it earlier today and published a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit, says this local privilege escalation was introduced roughly nine years ago in the Linux kernel’s algif_aead cryptographic algorithm interface.
Dirty Frag works by chaining two separate kernel flaws, the xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write vulnerability and the RxRPC Page-Cache Write vulnerability, to modify protected system files in memory without authorization and achieve privilege escalation.
Also, while Dirty Frag belongs to the same class as the Dirty Pipe and Copy Fail Linux vulnerabilities, it exploits the fragment field of a different kernel data structure.
Advertisement
“As with the previous Copy Fail vulnerability, Dirty Frag likewise allows immediate root privilege escalation on all major distributions, and it
“Dirty Frag is a case that extends the bug class to which Dirty Pipe and Copy Fail belong. Because it is a deterministic logic bug that does not depend on a timing window, no race condition is required, the kernel does not panic when the exploit fails, and the success rate is very high.”
This kernel privilege escalation affects a wide range of Linux distros, including Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, CentOS Stream, AlmaLinux, openSUSE Tumbleweed, and Fedora, which have not yet received patches.
Dirty Frag demo (Hyunwoo Kim)
Kim released complete Dirty Frag documentation and a PoC exploit with distribution maintainers’ agreement after an embargo on full public disclosure was broken on May 7, 2026, when an unrelated third party independently published the exploit.
“Because the embargo has currently been broken, no patch or CVE exists. After consultation with the maintainers on linux-distros@vs.openwall.org and at their request, this Dirty Frag document is being published,” Kim said.
Advertisement
To secure systems against attacks, Linux users can use the following command to remove the vulnerable esp4, esp6, and rxrpc kernel modules (however, it’s important to note that this will break IPsec VPNs and AFS distributed network file systems):
This new zero-day disclosure comes as Linux distro maintainers are still rolling out patches for “Copy Fail,” another root privilege escalation vulnerability now actively exploited in attacks.
“This type of vulnerability is a frequent attack vector for malicious cyber actors and poses significant risks to the federal enterprise,” the U.S. cybersecurity agency warned at the time. “Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Advertisement
In April, Linux distros patched another root-privilege escalation vulnerability (dubbed Pack2TheRoot) that had been found after a decade since it was introduced in the PackageKit daemon.
Update May 08, 09:58 EDT: The two page-cache write vulnerabilities chained by Dirty Frag are now tracked under the following CVE IDs: the xfrm-ESP one was assigned CVE-2026-43284, and the RxRPC isye is now CVE-2026-43500.
AI chained four zero-days into one exploit that bypassed both renderer and OS sandboxes. A wave of new exploits is coming.
At the Autonomous Validation Summit (May 12 & 14), see how autonomous, context-rich validation finds what’s exploitable, proves controls hold, and closes the remediation loop.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Edifier M90: One-minute review
When you get into audio, it quickly becomes clear that the best stereo speakers won’t be enough. Sure, they’ll cover your living room, but what about your desktop? Your TV set-up? It’s time to buy more speakers!
…or you could accept the the Edifier M90 speakers’ pitch, which is to just buy one pair of speakers that have absolutely loads of connection options. Not only do they have the basics — Bluetooth 6.0 and aux-in — they have support for optical, USB-C in and HDMI eARC.
Advertisement
That latter’s a big selling point here, so you can plug the Edifier M90 speakers into your TV without losing audio fidelity, as it’s something not offered by too many similar options.
Latest Videos From
But the real appeal is being able to do all of these things at once: I could connect the Edifier M90 to my TV, turntable, MP3 player and phone all at the same time, and use the remote to flick between them easily. They replaced every part of my hi-fi set-up, just like that.
And you’re not replacing them with just anything, either. Thanks to their big mid-bass drivers, these things deliver powerful mids and bass frequencies, defying their relatively compact stature to fill small and medium rooms.
In some cases, the treble was a little weaker than it could have been, but the Connex app equalizer can go some way in fixing that. Although, that may be the only time you use the app, as it doesn’t do much else…
Advertisement
If anything will put buyers off the Edifier M90, it’s the price. It’s not expensive for what you get, but it’s a big step up from the Edifier M60, and some might not deem the improved specs or eARC addition worth it.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Edifier M90 review: Price and release date
(Image credit: Future)
Announced in January 2026
On sale in US, not UK or AU yet
Priced at $369 (about £270, AU$520)
The Edifier M90 were unveiled at the start of 2026, at CES on January 6, and have been slowly rolling out to physical and online store shelves ever since.
They’re priced at $369 (about £270 / AU$520, but a release in the UK or Australia has yet to be confirmed). That’s quite a step up from the $199 / £159 / AU$289 Edifier M60, but it’s fitting for the spec and size increase.
Advertisement
Depending on where you live, these are cheaper or pricier than the five-star Dali Kupid, which go for $599 / £299 / AU$599, and they closely match the $399.99 / £333.32 / A$620 Fluance RI71, two options that are on our list of the best stereo speakers.
Edifier M90 review: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Drivers
1-inch tweeter, 4-inch mid-bass driver
Advertisement
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 6.0
Connections:
Bluetooth, AUX, USB-C, HDMI eARC, optical
Advertisement
Edifier M90 review: Features
(Image credit: Future)
USB-C, Bluetooth, optical, 3.5mm and HDMI eARC connections
App lets you change remote presets
Built-in amplification and DAC
Perhaps the most tempting reason to buy the Edifier M90 is its range of connection options. You can hook it up to outputs via Bluetooth (at the 6.0 standard), 3.5mm aux-in, USB-C, optical, or HDMI eARC — all at the same time, to jump between using the remote.
The last of those connections is perhaps the most intriguing addition, letting you connect them to your TV so they can be an alternative to a soundbar. This is still relatively uncommon in bookshelf speakers like this (though it’s growing).
Edifier has an app, called ConneX, which you can use for a few extra features. Like the remote, ConneX lets you jump between input sources, control your media playback, and see what you’re actually listening to.
But you can also use the app to customize what the remote’s EQ buttons do, tweaking the settings on a nine-band equalizer. You can also set up a custom mode, which I turned into a movie-tuned balance.
Advertisement
As you can tell from that short list of features, ConneX is far from necessary — I didn’t use it for the first few weeks of testing, and didn’t open it again after setting up my equalizers — and I can see many users ignoring it completely.
This means you’re not getting any in-app streaming support (since there’s no Wi-Fi) or multi-room support. There’s no automatic room correction for the sound or anything like that either.
Edifier M90 review: Sound quality
(Image credit: Future)
1-inch driver + 4-inch mid-bass driver
50W output for each unit
Solid bass and mids, trebles could fall out a little
Each Edifier M90 unit has a one-inch tweeter and four-inch mid-bass driver, totaling 50W of amplification, which is naturally doubled for the pair. That’s 100W in total, and it was sufficient for my medium-sized living room as an ersatz soundbar or bookshelf speaker — for a desktop setup, it’ll offer more than enough oomph.
The larger driver does a great job in making a subwoofer feel unnecessary, with bass lines broadcast around my living room and mids given glorious prominence in tunes. Frankly, I was surprised by how much low-end I’d get from songs, given that it’s only 2.0 sound, but it was a supported, scooping bass that maintained clarity.
Advertisement
Higher lines such as tinkling piano, higher-pitched vocals and strings maintained the clarity and detail of bass, but were sometimes a little lost in the mix for certain tracks. Dope Lemon’s Marinade is my go-to track for stereo imaging, and its rhythm guitar was hard to make out from the specific speaker I should have been able to hear it in.
Meanwhile, Michigan Rattlers’ Desert Heat’s sax wasn’t as sparkling as on some other speakers I’ve tested.
Testing the M90s alongside a TV, you’re naturally not getting the soundstage or blasting power of a really big soundbar, but I was pleased with the performance as a solid step up from my set’s built-in speakers. I put it through its paces through a variety of genres, and it was only big, bombastic battle scenes where it felt like it was struggling to express everything.
Advertisement
Edifier M90 review: Design
(Image credit: Future)
Familiar boxy design in white or black
8.35 x 5.24 x 8.86 in / 21.2 x 13.3 x 22.5cm, 6.6lbs / 3kg each
Some controls on back of unit
The Edifier M90 will look familiar to people who’ve been shopping around the brand’s options, as it’s a doppelganger for the M60. You’re getting two clean and simple speakers, with a large woofer topped by a smaller tweeter, in either white or black.
The speakers are 8.35 inches tall, 5.24 inches wide and 8.86 inches deep, so they can fit on your desktop by your monitor, or on a bookshelf (as you can see in the pictures). They’re light enough not to worry fragile shelves, and to be easy to move about your apartment too.
While the M90 look clean at the front, there’s a mess at the back. One of the speakers has five different jacks hidden around the corner – not including the audio input – as well as a power switch and volume dial. We’ll get more into this jacks in the Features section, but because of them, the back of my unit quickly became a mess of cables (as you’ll see in the images).
It’s a little annoying that these controls are hidden around the back of the speaker, but the remote makes up for it.
The in-box remote takes two AAA batteries, and it’s nice and small. It has the expected buttons — volume, skip tracks, mute — as well as options to quickly change the input, which I found useful for changing between my TV connection, Bluetooth phone, and any wired options such as a turntable.
Advertisement
You can also use the remote to flick between three presets: Classic Dynamic and Monitor, which you can set up yourself.
Edifier M90 review: Value
(Image credit: Future)
Fits many niches in your home hi-fi set-up
Not quite as good as any one unit it replaces
The Edifier M90’s price step up from its sibling might give some buyers pause, and a good argument would be made for other stereo speaker setups, which could get you more for your money — especially when it comes to better stereo imaging.
But when you consider how versatile the M90s are, the value proposition becomes a little clearer. These aren’t just for your bookshelf, but can be used for your desktop and TV as well. And so they could be a great value option rather than buying separate pieces of tech for your hi-fi setup — a real all-rounder.
Advertisement
Should I buy the Edifier M90?
(Image credit: Future)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Edifier M90 scorecard
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Features
Advertisement
The range of connection options is great, but the app doesn’t add much.
3.5 / 5
Sound quality
I was impressed by the bass capability and volume, though could have done with clearer treble.
Advertisement
4 / 5
Design
They’re relatively compact and clean-looking, with a useful remote.
4 / 5
Advertisement
Value
As a Swiss Army Knife for audio, they’re good value for what they offer.
4 / 5
Advertisement
Buy them if…
Don’t buy them if…
Edifier M90 review: Also consider
How I tested the Edifier M90
(Image credit: Future)
Tested for several months
Tested at home connected to phones, laptops, TVs, turntables and more
I used the Edifier M90 for several months before writing this review. In that time I used the M90 alongside a vast range of devices. I connected them wirelessly to several smartphones, via USB-C or aux to phones, MP3 players and laptops, and also to my TV and turntable.
That means they were used for streaming music, records, MP3 tracks, lossless music, movies, TV shows and games. Several devices I’ve tested in the last few months, including the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Majority MP3 Player, got particular time with the M90.
Advertisement
I’ve been testing audio products for TechRadar for years, including other Edifier speakers, Bluetooth speakers and headphones.
After months of rumours and sly teasers, Google has finally officially unveiled the Fitbit Air – its screenless wearable.
But how does the screenless Fitbit Air compare to the four-star Fitbit Charge 6? Is the Fitbit Air considered an upgrade, or is it only designed with certain users in mind?
We’ve assessed the Fitbit Air’s specs and compared them to the Fitbit Charge 6’s own to help you decide which wearable will suit you best.
At the time of writing, the Fitbit Air is available for pre-order and will launch officially in the US and UK from May 26. With an official RRP of £84.99/$99.99, it’s one of the cheaper options in Google’s Fitbit range.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208510
In comparison, the Fitbit Charge 6 is available to buy now and has a higher RRP of £139/$159.95. However, as the Fitbit Charge 6 is a few years old, it’s possible to pick up the wearable with a solid price cut. For example, at the time of writing US customers could pick up the Fitbit Charge 6 for just $119.95 from Google’s official store.
Advertisement
Although both wearables can be used without a subscription, they are compatible with Google Health Premium – the newest monthly plan that unlocks features such as Google Health Coach. This plan will set you back an additional $9.99 a month (the UK price is TBC at the time of writing).
Fitbit Air is screenless
Take one look at the Fitbit Air and Fitbit Charge 6 and the difference is clear: the Fitbit Air is entirely screenless. Much like Whoop, the Fitbit Air is designed to quietly track your health and fitness data without any distraction.
Advertisement
Fitbit Air on wrist. Image Credit (Google)
This might sound confusing to those who have never used a screenless fitness tracker, as you might be wondering how you control the Fitbit Air or track a workout without the use of a screen. Essentially, you can use the companion smartphone app (Google Health) to see your metrics and data, plus manually start or add a workout. However, the Fitbit Air benefits from auto-workout detection which means it will know when you’ve started exercising and will track and log the workout accordingly.
Google Health app. Image Credit (Google)
In comparison, the Fitbit Charge 6 is fitted with a 1.4-inch AMOLED touchscreen display that has a Gorilla Glass 3 covering for scratch resistance. The display is bright, detailed and offers an always-on option (although keep in mind that’ll drain the battery faster). Plus, the inclusion of the display means you’ll have access to Google Wallet, Google Maps and even YouTube Music Controls without needing to rely on your phone.
Fitbit Charge 6 on wrist. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
This means the Fitbit Charge 6 can double as a smartwatch, rather than just being a fitness tracker.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Fitbit Air charges faster, but both promise the same battery life
We should disclaim that battery life will vary depending on your individual usage. However, both the Fitbit Air and Fitbit Charge 6 generally promise up to seven days of battery life – however when its always-on display is enabled, the Fitbit Charge 6 drops down to around four days.
The Fitbit Air does promise to offer faster charging than the Fitbit Charge 6, with Google claiming the wearable can go from 0 to 100% in about 90 minutes. In addition, a five minute charge should result in one day of power too.
In comparison, we found that the Fitbit Charge 6 takes around two hours to reach 100% power.
Fitbit Air. Image Credit (Google)
Fitbit Charge 6 has built-in GPS
Although the Fitbit Air can track runs and the like, it doesn’t actually have built-in GPS. Instead, you’ll need to ensure your paired phone is with you. On the other hand, the Fitbit Charge 6 technically benefits from on-device GPS which means you shouldn’t need to carry your phone out with you.
We should disclaim that its GPS isn’t particularly reliable, as we found it works best when your paired phone is with you and the Fitbit Charge 6 can swap between your handset’s GPS and the device’s antenna based on signal strength. However, once you leave your phone at home, we found the Charge 6 struggles to accurately track your route and instead bases distance on the accelerometer instead. This is a known issue, and one that appeared on the 2021 Fitbit Charge 5 too.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Fitbit Charge 6. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Fitbit Air promises more accurate sleep tracking
Google promises that the Fitbit Air sees huge improvements in sleep tracking compared to previous Fitbit models. Not only does the Fitbit Air see in-depth tracking that captures time spent in each sleep stage and breathing regularity, but it also summarises this information into a personalised Sleep Score. This, Google explains, is powered by advanced new machine learning models that are 15% more accurate than before.
The Fitbit Charge 6 does offer impressively accurate sleep tracking, and we even concluded that it feels more accurate than rival offerings. With this in mind, the promise of more accurate tracking is certainly promising.
Sleep on the Google Health app. Image Credit (Google)
Fitbit Air is designed for Google Health Coach
One of the key features of the Fitbit Air is, somewhat annoyingly, sat behind Google’s monthly subscription, Google Health Premium. However, at $9.99 a month, it’s arguably an easier pill to swallow than the likes of Whoop’s annual subscription costs.
Signing up to Google Health Premium unlocks Google Health Coach, a personalised coach that’s built with Google’s Gemini. The Coach promises to deliver personalised guidance based on your metrics, fitness goals and lifestyle too. Plus, Health Coach unlocks the aforementioned Sleep Score and can also answer your specific health and fitness-related questions too.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Early Verdict
The Fitbit Air is easily one of the most exciting Fitbit launches in recent times, and looks set to be a genuinely viable competitor to Whoop. Deciding between the Fitbit Air and Fitbit Charge 6 will depend entirely on your personal preference – if you want a wearable that doubles as a smartwatch then the Fitbit Charge 6 is an easy choice.
On the other hand, if you want a dedicated fitness tracker that benefits from Google’s Gemini-powered Health Coach, then the Fitbit Air is an appealing alternative.
We’ll be sure to update this versus once we review the Fitbit Air, so make sure you visit back in due course.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login