FiiO’s product pipeline has been relentless. Over the past two years, the company has introduced a few dozen new models spanning portable DACs, Bluetooth amplifiers, IEMs, headphones, desktop gear, and now increasingly innovative home audio components. Some have been clear hits. Others have felt like experiments in a very crowded field. That is the reality when a brand moves this fast.
The $199 FiiO BTR17, launched in late 2024 as a portable Bluetooth DAC and headphone amplifier, arrived during the early phase of this surge. At the time, it drew rave reviews and strong word of mouth. Now in 2026, it is no longer the newest device in the lineup, but it may be one of the most durable and worthwhile.
Behind the scenes, it is clear that FiiO has no intention of slowing down. What we have seen offline suggests that 2026 and 2027 will bring even more ambitious desktop and home audio components that push the brand further upmarket. Against that backdrop, the BTR17 stands out as one of the earlier releases from this cycle and possibly one of the most complete.
In a market overflowing with portable DAC and amplifier options between $99 and $299, the question is simple. Is the BTR17 still relevant in 2026, and was it quietly one of FiiO’s best moves during this recent run?
Advertisement
Specifications & Technology
Let’s start where it actually matters with the BTR17: the DAC and the amplification stage.
Digital to analogue conversion is handled by a pair of ESS Sabre ES9069Q chips. On paper, they are serious performers, rated at up to 130 dB dynamic range with THD plus noise hovering around -120 dB, all while keeping power consumption in check. These are not entry level DACs thrown in to hit a price point. They are modern, efficient, and more than capable of resolving fine detail without adding grit or glare of their own.
On the amplification side, FiiO opted for the THX AAA 78+ platform. The design uses eight op-amps in a parallel configuration and can deliver up to 650 mW from the balanced 4.4 mm output into 32 ohm headphones. There is an important caveat. That full output is only available in wired Desktop mode. In portable use, maximum output drops to 300 mW, which is still respectable but not the headline number.
Power delivery inside the BTR17 is not an afterthought. The internal supply is divided into three distinct stages to keep things stable and controlled:
Advertisement
Stage 1: Filtering and overvoltage protection
Stage 2: DC to DC boost conversion
Stage 3: High precision LDO voltage stabilization
Critical sections such as the DAC chips and the amplifier each receive power from dedicated rails, a design choice intended to reduce interference and improve overall performance. Whether that translates into audible benefits is something we will dig into in the listening section.
A quick word on Desktop mode, because it is one of the BTR17’s more practical features. Flip the switch and connect power to the dedicated USB C “power in” port, and the unit runs from an external supply instead of its internal battery. That means you can use it at a desk all day without cycling the battery. For anyone planning to use this as a compact home DAC and amp, that is not a small detail.
There are two additional operating modes: BT and PHONE.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
BT mode is exactly what it sounds like. It is engaged when using the BTR17 wirelessly. The unit runs Bluetooth 5.4 via Qualcomm’s QCC5181 platform, with support for transmission rates up to 2100 kbps, along with LDAC and aptX Lossless. In practical terms, that puts it at the front of the pack for high resolution wireless audio support at this price.
PHONE mode is more about power management. In this setting, the BTR17 shares the load with the connected source device rather than drawing heavily from it. The idea is to reduce battery drain on your phone or tablet during wired use. It is a thoughtful inclusion for anyone who has watched their phone battery nosedive during a long listening session.
Back to the hardware.
FiiO fitted the BTR17 with an XMOS XU316 USB processor, which is not bargain bin silicon. It offers low latency, stable data transmission, and support for 32-bit/768kHz PCM and native DSD512. Even with the built in parametric EQ engaged, it can handle up to 192 kHz. In short, there is more than enough headroom here for any real world use case.
Speaking of EQ, you get a full 10 band parametric setup to fine tune the sound. That means proper control over frequency, gain, and EQ, not just a handful of preset tone tweaks. Profiles can be saved, imported, exported, and shared through the FiiO Control app, so if you have a dialed in curve for a specific IEM or headphone, you can pass it along instead of trying to describe it over text like a lunatic.
Advertisement
The FiiO Control app also handles core settings and firmware updates. Most adjustments can be made directly on the device, but the app makes deeper configuration easier and keeps the unit current with software refinements.
As for battery life, FiiO rates the BTR17 at roughly eight hours using the 4.4 mm balanced output. In practice, that figure held up during continuous use with LDAC over Bluetooth. For a compact all in one DAC and amplifier at $199, that is a solid, realistic result rather than marketing fantasy.
Design & Build Quality
The centerpiece of the BTR17’s design is its display. The 1.3 inch IPS screen, with a 240 x 240 resolution, is bright enough for outdoor use and delivers surprisingly vibrant color for a device this small. Key information is always front and center, including volume level, active Bluetooth codec, and sampling rate. Each codec is color coded, which makes it easy to see at a glance what you are actually streaming.
FiiO makes a point of highlighting the tactile, stepped volume knob. In practice, it is serviceable but not exactly luxurious. The rotation feels a bit light, and the integrated push button comes across slightly hollow and sticky when pressed. It works, but I have handled more refined implementations on competing devices.
The back panel is wrapped in raw leather, which adds some welcome texture and grip. The main chassis is aluminum alloy, something that still is not guaranteed in the sub $200 category. The overall construction feels solid even if the control hardware is not class leading.
Advertisement
In the box, FiiO includes the usual documentation, a well made leatherette case, and an eight stranded USB C to C cable that looks and feels more premium than expected at this price.
Physically, the BTR17 measures 16.3 mm x 41.2 mm x 86.6 mm, which translates to roughly 0.64 x 1.62 x 3.41 inches. It weighs about 73.4 grams, or approximately 2.6 ounces. In daily use, it is compact and light enough to disappear into a pocket. Our review sample was black, but it is also available in a striking blue finish.
On the right side of the chassis you will find the physical controls. Just below the volume knob sits the power button. Beneath that are the forward and backward track buttons, which also double as EQ preset selectors. Further down are the switches for power mode selection and Desktop mode activation.
Along the bottom edge are two USB-C ports. One handles data transfer and charging, while the second is dedicated to external power input when using Desktop mode. Up top are the headphone outputs: a standard 3.5 mm single ended jack and a 4.4 mm balanced Pentaconn connection.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Listening & Headphone Synergy
With output figures that edge toward a full watt in Desktop mode, the BTR17 has more than enough muscle for the vast majority of full size over ear headphones. Even in portable mode, there is sufficient headroom for anyone who listens at spirited levels.
At that point, the conversation shifts. Raw power is only part of the equation. The real question is how clean, controlled, and refined that power sounds. Quality of amplification matters just as much as quantity, and in many cases more.
It is also worth saying that using a Bluetooth DAC and amplifier in general feels liberating. Being able to move around freely without being anchored to a desk changes the experience in a very real way. That freedom alone makes listening more enjoyable, and it gives the BTR17 an advantage that is not captured on a spec sheet.
The first thing I noticed after plugging the HiFiMAN HE1000 Unveiled into the BTR17 was a subtle but clear sense of added weight down low, even with no EQ engaged. I do not believe the unit is altering frequency response in any dramatic way, but there is a perceptible increase in bass impact and authority compared to some other solid state DAC and amp combinations.
Advertisement
On “Why So Serious?” by Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard, the subterranean swell that creeps in around the three and a half minute mark had more physical presence and drive than I heard from the FiiO JM21 DAP I reviewed recently. The BTR17 gives that moment extra grunt, which makes the track feel more visceral without tipping into exaggeration.
That translates into a slightly warm overall character, but not one that sounds bloated or soft. The midrange remains articulate and clean, and there is a mild lift in the upper mids that enhances perceived detail. Dynamics are lively across the spectrum, with good separation and fine note clarity. Treble extension is intact with no obvious roll off, though it stops short of the most ethereal or shimmering presentation I have heard. Even so, the delicate triangle hits in L’Impératrice’s “La Lune” came through clearly and without any significant loss of detail.
I have often felt that the HE1000 Unveiled can use a touch more foundation in the bass. The BTR17 does not transform it into a reference caliber headphone in that range, but it does add just enough authority down low to counterbalance the headphone’s inherent treble energy. The pairing felt cohesive and well judged rather than artificially thickened.
Listening was split between wired Desktop mode and wireless operation over LDAC from my phone. Despite the lower maximum output and reduced sampling rate in Bluetooth mode, I was genuinely hard pressed to identify meaningful sonic differences between the two in casual and focused listening. That should reassure anyone planning to use this primarily as a wireless solution.
That said, perspective matters. Moving over to a dedicated desktop chain like the SMSL DO400 paired with the Aune S17 Pro immediately delivered greater soundstage width, more defined layering, and a higher level of micro detail. The BTR17 gets impressively close for a compact all in one device, but a serious desktop stack still has the edge in outright scale and refinement.
The Bottom Line
The FiiO BTR17 gets the fundamentals right.
It delivers clean, controlled power with a slightly warm tilt that adds welcome body without sacrificing clarity. The dual ESS DAC implementation, THX AAA amplification, XMOS USB stage, and full 10 band parametric EQ are not filler features. They translate into real flexibility and performance that push this well beyond basic Bluetooth dongle territory. In Desktop mode, it has enough output to handle demanding full size headphones. In wireless mode over LDAC or aptX Lossless, it retains far more composure and resolution than most portable solutions in this price bracket.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
What it does not do is replace a serious desktop stack. You will still get greater scale, layering, and ultimate refinement from a dedicated DAC and amplifier chain. The volume control hardware is also merely adequate rather than premium. If you are chasing the last word in micro detail or build finesse, this is not that device.
What makes the BTR17 compelling in 2026 is the combination of genuine audiophile architecture, robust codec support, proper EQ control, and real world usability in a device that fits in your pocket. It is as comfortable on a desk in Desktop mode as it is clipped to a jacket streaming from your phone.
Who should consider it? Anyone who wants near desktop performance without being chained to a desk and headphone enthusiasts with multiple pairs of headphones and IEMs to drive; and that includes commuters and business travellers who have not ventured down the wireless earbud or headphone rabbit hole.
In a cycle where FiiO has released dozens of products, the BTR17 stands out as one of the more complete and mature executions. Not perfect. Not revolutionary. But very, very well executed for $199.
Advertisement
Pros:
Powerful for the size – Up to 650 mW balanced in Desktop mode with enough headroom for most full size headphones, including higher impedance models.
Excellent wireless support – Bluetooth 5.4 with LDAC and aptX Lossless delivers near wired performance in real world use.
High end internal architecture – Dual ESS ES9069Q DACs, THX AAA 78+ amplification, and XMOS XU316 USB stage at $199 is strong value.
Full 10 band parametric EQ – Deep tuning capability with profile import and export via the FiiO Control app.
Flexible use cases – Desktop mode, PHONE mode power management, balanced and single ended outputs, compact and genuinely portable.
Cons:
Not a true desktop replacement – Dedicated DAC and amplifier stacks still outperform it in staging, layering, and ultimate refinement.
Volume knob feels average – Tactile response and integrated button lack a premium feel.
Power drops in portable mode – Maximum output is reduced outside Desktop mode.
Treble is clean but not exceptional – Extended and articulate, though not the most airy presentation.
Feature density may overwhelm casual users – Extensive settings and modes require some learning curve.
Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.
For today’s Connections: Sports Edition, the purple category came to me right away, and it’s usually the toughest. I also got a kick out of the green category. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.
Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.
Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.
Yellow group hint: Same-same.
Advertisement
Green group hint: Otto, Anna.
Blue group hint: He ain’t heavy…
Purple group hint: The DMZ is one.
Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? It’s not too tough, but 7-Across made me stop and start thinking of five-letter beverage brands. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.
If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.
Samsung’s next generation of foldable phones could bring some changes to charging, though not all of them might be what fans are hoping for. According to recent certification listings spotted via SammyGuru, upcoming devices like the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and a new “Wide Fold” variant have appeared on China’s 3C database, hinting at potential updates to charging capabilities.
Samsung
These listings typically reveal wired charging specs ahead of launch, making them an early indicator of what to expect. But here’s the catch: the “upgrade” might not be as big as it sounds.
What do the leaks actually reveal?
Two upcoming devices, SM-F9710 and SM-F9760, are believed to be the Chinese variants of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and a new “Galaxy Z Wide Fold.” These listings show support for 15V at 3A charging, which translates to 45W wired charging. If accurate, that would mark a noticeable jump over previous Fold models, which have typically been limited to 25W wired charging.
SammyGuru
However, a separate listing for what’s believed to be the Galaxy Z Flip 8 shows 9V at 2.77A (~25W) charging, essentially unchanged from its predecessor. So while the Fold lineup may finally see a boost, the Flip series appears to be sticking with the same charging speeds for now.
How big of an upgrade is this?
For the Fold lineup, this is actually a meaningful upgrade. Samsung has stuck with 25W charging for years, so moving to 45W would finally bring it closer to its Galaxy S Ultra devices and noticeably cut down charging times. That said, these numbers only apply to wired charging, as 3C listings don’t reveal wireless speeds.
Nirave Gondhia / Digital Trends
For buyers, this is a welcome but uneven improvement. The Fold 8 and Wide Fold could see a solid boost, while the Flip 8 may remain unchanged, creating a clear divide in the lineup. It’s a step in the right direction, but not quite the full upgrade many were hoping for. Especially when you already have players like OnePlus and other Chinese brands that go well beyond 100W.
Elon Musk made a game-changing announcement hours ago when he revealed plans for Tesla’s Terafab during a live event, taking its work on vehicles and robots literally out of this world. The initiative is a game changer, bringing together SpaceX and xAI to create the world’s largest chip factory. The sheer scale of the operation is mind-boggling, since Terafab will be capable of producing 1 trillion watts of finished chips every year, all under one gigantic roof that will house logic circuits, memory storage, and final packaging.
All of this is important because we desperately need a reliable mechanism to generate solar energy that can be beamed back from space. Terafab is specifically built to accomplish just that. We’re talking about launching an incredible 100 million tons of capture equipment into orbit EVERY YEAR. To accomplish this, we must be able to move millions of tons of material year after year. Once in orbit, solar-powered satellites will conduct all of the AI heavy lifting, with millions of Tesla Optimus robots on hand to erect and maintain those structures well above the good old earth.
Each of those Optimus robots is a significant undertaking, as they require between 100 and 200 billion watts of chips just to function. When you factor in the satellites, you can see the tremendous demand we’re talking about: trillions of watts of chips that no existing chip manufacturer can possibly offer, at least not yet. According to projections, we will have the same shortage until 2030.
That is where Terafab comes in, since it is specifically designed to bridge that gap, with the kind of huge capacity that has the ability to overcome the hurdles that have been holding back both ground-based robot fleets and processing power in orbit. To get it erected, the construction team will use established launch techniques to transport the enormous cargo into place. To get the factory up and running, robots that are already in development will take on assembly tasks that are simply too dangerous for humans to do on a regular basis. As a result, we will have a consistent supply of chips to meet our rising requirements on Earth and beyond.
Advertisement
ELON MUSK: “We’re starting off with an advanced technology fab here in Austin, and I’d like to thank @GregAbbott_TX and the state of Texas for the support.
So in the advanced technology fab, we will have all of the equipment necessary to make a chip of any kind logical memory,… pic.twitter.com/kQ1r5pCgcn
The driving factor behind all of this is a strong desire to explore the universe, not just envision what’s out there, but to experience it firsthand. As one of the speakers put it, “understanding comes only from direct experience out there in the universe,” and Terafab is the first step in translating that idea into something concrete, something that anyone can track, from the start of creation to the end of delivery.
The decision, made public on Thursday, concludes that Apple’s latest implementation of pulse-oximetry functionality falls outside the scope of Masimo’s asserted rights. The full ITC commission will now review the judge’s ruling and decide whether to adopt it – a step that will determine whether the redesigned watches remain protected… Read Entire Article Source link
The 2026 C# Course Bundle offers 8 courses that cover everything C#. You’ll master the fundamentals, explore object-oriented programming, and start building your own apps in no time. It’s on sale for $40.
Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.
‘We should regard it as a privilege to be stepping stones to higher things’: How Arthur C Clarke predicted the rise of AGI and the looming demise of humanity back in 1964
While debate over the timeline – or even the potential – for artificial general intelligence (AGI) rages on in 2026, one futurist may have predicted the breakthrough more than 60 years ago.
Noted British science fiction writer and futurist Arthur C. Clarke touted the arrival of AGI during an interview at the 1964 World’s Fair in New York City.
Speaking to the BBCat the time, Clarke’s sweeping interview predicted everything from “replicator” tools which can “make an exact copy of anything” (3D printing, perhaps?) to the creation of “intelligent and useful servants among the other animals on this planet”.
Advertisement
Article continues below
Great apes, dolphins, and whales were all noted as potential “servants” in this regard, according to Clarke. Suffice to say this prediction hasn’t materialized. What does stand out, however, are his predictions about the future of intelligent machines.
“The most intelligent inhabitants of that future world won’t be men or monkeys,” he said. “They’ll be machines, the remote descendants of today’s computers.”
Advertisement
“Present-day electronic brains are complete morons, but this will not be true in another generation. They will start to think, and eventually, they will completely out-think their makers.”
Clarke pondered whether this prospect was “depressing”, but noted that advances in technology on this front represent the next evolutionary step in humanity’s journey.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
“We superseded the Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal men, and we presume we’re an improvement,” he added.
Advertisement
“We should regard it as a privilege to be stepping stones to higher things. I suspect that organic evolution has about come to its end, and we are now at the beginning of inorganic or mechanical evolution, which will be thousands of times swifter.”
The AGI conundrum
The debate over whether AGI is even attainable has raged for some. While typically confined to the realms of science fiction, the advent of generative AI in late 2022 once again brought the topic back to the fore.
Notably, debate over the actual definition of AGI is a key sticking point for many in the industry, and society more broadly. By Google’s definition, for example, AGI refers to:
“The hypothetical intelligence of a machine that possesses the ability to understand or learn any intellectual task that a human being can. It is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that aims to mimic the cognitive abilities of the human brain.”
Taking this into account, it’s safe to say that humanity hasn’t reached AGI quite yet, or is anywhere close to reaching that goal. But major industry players such as OpenAI insist that reaching AGI is their ultimate end goal.
In a 2025 blog post last year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reflected on the company’s pursuit of this so far elusive moment, noting that progress is being made at a nominal pace.
Advertisement
“We are now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it,” Altman wrote.
During a September 2025 interview at the WELT AI Summit, Altman once again banged the drum for an imminent AGI breakthrough, claiming that AI will surpass human intelligence by 2030.
It’s worth noting that OpenAI’s own definition of AGI differs from that of the aforementioned Google – a fact that underscores the conflicting outlook on this subject.
OpenAI defines AGI as a “highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work”. That definition might, at least in some circles, be a rather low bar to set – especially given advances in AI over the last 18 months.
Advertisement
The path to AGI is becoming clearer
The advent of agentic AI suggests that progress by OpenAI’s definition is being made to some extent. Rather than traditional AI “assistants” rolled out by big tech providers during the early days of the generative AI boom, agents are capable of autonomously conducting tasks on behalf of human workers.
That marked a step change in how enterprises and consumers alike engage with the technology, and it has wide-reaching implications for the future of work. Areas such as customer service, for example, have been firmly in the crosshairs of agentic AI providers, with these roles identified as prime candidates for automation.
In other professions, such as software development, AI is already outperforming human workers in areas such as coding.
Advertisement
To some, these advances might point toward humanity reaching the tipping point on AGI, but a key factor in whether or not AGI can be acknowledged lies in generality.
Specialist AI tools or agents aimed specifically at conducting one particular task isn’t a marker of AGI, more that these tools and bots have been trained with these tasks in mind.
However, being able to switch between tasks and carry them out at the same level of efficiency is, according to Google. Core characteristics of AGI by the tech giant’s definition include “generalization ability”.
“AGI can transfer knowledge and skills learned in one domain to another, enabling it to adapt to new and unseen situations effectively,” the company notes.
Advertisement
Common cause in big tech
Altman isn’t the only leading industry figure convinced that AGI is achievable and looming around the corner. A host of industry leaders such as Dario Amodei and Elon Musk have also touted the potential in the near future.
What these figures all have in common, however, is that their long-term roadmap is based on achieving this goal, and it’s becoming increasingly important in deals between industry players.
Clarke may have loosely predicted a future of intelligent machines capable of human-level thinking, but what he likely couldn’t have predicted is exactly how much was at stake from a financial perspective.
Hannspree Hybri monitor uses ambient light to significantly reduce energy consumption
Reflective display design aims to mimic paper-like readability and comfort
Automatic switching enables backlight use in low ambient light conditions
The Hannspree Hybri monitor attempts to merge paper-like readability with modern display performance, claiming an 80% reduction in energy use through innovative use of ambient light.
At illumination levels above 1000lux, common in offices, classrooms, and outdoor-adjacent spaces, the monitor reflects surrounding light instead of relying solely on a backlight.
This reflective approach is designed to mimic the visual comfort of paper, offering high contrast and clarity while lowering eye strain.
Article continues below
Advertisement
Hybrid operation adapts automatically
Its advanced TLCD architecture, coupled with micro-perforated backlight control, supports hybrid operation.
This allows the monitor to switch automatically to backlighting when ambient light falls below 500lux.
Advertisement
A built-in sensor adjusts brightness in ‘smart mode’, aiming to maintain eye protection and consistent visibility in fluctuating light conditions.
Measuring 23.8in, the Hybri features the ecoVISION Paper Display, which reduces harmful blue light exposure and provides a flicker-free, anti-glare experience.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
The display supports 16.7 million colors at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, with a refresh rate of 75Hz and a typical response time of 5ms.
Advertisement
Connectivity includes HDMI, DisplayPort, VGA, and USB Type-C with up to 65W power delivery, while the ergonomic stand offers tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustments.
“This is more than just a new product. Hybri sets a new standard for the display industry, where well-being, efficiency, and performance finally come together,” said Martin Kent, Territory Manager, HANNspree.
“It’s a new vision for how we should interact with screens. Paper-like comfort, superior eye care, and full multimedia performance in one device is the future of healthier, smarter digital work and life.”
Advertisement
This device achieves energy savings primarily through its reliance on natural light, consuming as little as 5.2W under bright conditions.
The monitor’s design emphasizes eye care, claiming zero blue light in Eye-care mode, flicker-free operation through DC dimming, sunlight readability, and anti-glare surfaces.
It also features four preset modes that optimize viewing for different tasks, from coding to reading and general productivity.
Despite these claims, the effectiveness of paper-like displays in maintaining clarity in varied lighting remains context dependent.
Advertisement
While the Hybri monitor addresses energy consumption and eye strain, the reliance on reflective light may limit brightness consistency in dim environments.
Professionals or students accustomed to traditional backlit business monitors might notice differences in color vibrancy and motion performance, particularly in low-light conditions.
The hybrid approach offers a compromise, although long-term benefits in both energy savings and visual comfort will require real-world evaluation.
Reddit may soon ask users to prove they’re human, and it might involve your face. During a TBPN podcast, Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, confirmed that the platform is exploring new identity verification methods, including using Face ID or Touch ID-style authentication, to tackle its growing bot problem.
RDDT requiring Face ID was not something I had on my bingo card but something has got to be done about all the fake / botted content — I just don’t know how to sell face-scanning to redditors or even lurkers. https://t.co/7e7K3Di4ip
The idea is simple: as AI-generated accounts become more convincing, Reddit wants stronger ways to confirm that users are real people and not bots pretending to be one.
Why is Reddit considering Face ID-style verification?
Unfortunately, bots are getting too good. Huffman has previously emphasized keeping the platform “human,” and this move fits right into that strategy. AI-generated content and automated accounts are becoming harder to detect, making moderation more challenging and threatening the authenticity of discussions.
Advertisement
Moinak Pal/Digital Trends
As such, verification methods like Face ID or biometric checks could act as a quick way to confirm a real person is behind an account, without requiring traditional ID uploads. But of course, it’s not that simple.
So… are we really scanning faces now?
Reddit isn’t going full sci-fi just yet. The company is still “weighing” its options, which could mean optional verification for certain features, regions, or accounts rather than forcing everyone to scan their face. We’ve already seen a preview of this in places like the UK, where Reddit uses selfies or ID checks for age verification.
Brett Jordan / Pexels
The next step could make things feel a lot more seamless and a bit more invasive. Instead of uploading IDs, Reddit may lean on device-level tools like Face ID to confirm you’re human, turning verification into something that happens in the background rather than a full process. Of course, that’s where things get messy.
Biometric checks raise big questions around privacy, data security, and consent, and users aren’t exactly thrilled about handing over their face to prove they’re not a bot. Reddit may be solving one problem, but it opens up another: how much verification is too much? Especially on a platform where anonymity is kind of the whole point?
According to Business Insider, the issue came up during a January Google DeepMind town hall, where VP of Global Affairs Tom Lue said the company was “leaning more” into national security work. Read Entire Article Source link
You must be logged in to post a comment Login