Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

GeekWire Awards: CEO of the Year finalists innovating across fintech, climate, real estate and more

Published

on

The 2026 GeekWire Award CEO of the Year finalists, clockwise from top left: Tony Huang, Possible Finance; Shelia Stafford, TeamSense; Karen Huh, Zucca; Luis Poggi, HouseWhisper; Aina Abiodun, VertueLab.

The finalists for CEO of the Year at the 2026 GeekWire Awards are leading startups and organizations across a diverse cross-section of the innovation economy, touching upon fintech, climate tech, frontline workforce software, food-and-beverage AI, and real estate technology.

This award, sponsored by Wilson Sonsini, celebrates leaders with vision, fortitude, creativity, and that impossible to define x-factor. The CEO of the Year finalists are: Tony Huang of Possible Finance, Aina Abiodun of VertueLab, Shelia Stafford of TeamSense, Karen Huh of Zucca, and Luis Poggi of HouseWhisper AI.

Now in its 18th year, the GeekWire Awards is the premier event recognizing the top leaders, companies and breakthroughs in Pacific Northwest tech, bringing together hundreds of people to celebrate innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit. It takes place May 7 at the Showbox SoDo in Seattle.

The 2025 CEO of the Year was Read AI co-founder and CEO David Shim, who has lead the Seattle company to more than $80 million in funding for its cross-platform AI meeting assistant and productivity tools.

Continue reading for information on the 2026 CEO of the Year finalists, who were chosen by a panel of independent judges from community nominations. You can help pick the winner: Cast your ballot here or in the embedded form at the bottom. Voting runs through April 16.

Tony Huang is co-founder and CEO of Possible Finance, a fintech startup that provides small-dollar loans and paycheck advances to people who need quick cash without a traditional credit check. The company had its first full year of consolidated profitability last year along with over $100 million in annual revenue. Possible has given funds to 1.6 million unique individuals and Huang says they’ve saved “hardworking everyday Americans” over $700 million — “costs they would have incurred if Possible didn’t exist.” The company is also hiring at its new downtown headquarters with multiple roles currently open.

Advertisement

Huang was previously a lead project manager at Axon, the leading manufacturer of non-lethal Taser stun guns, policing software, and supplies including in-car and policy body cameras.

Aina Abiodun is president and executive director of VertueLab, a longtime nonprofit that supports climate tech entrepreneurs at every stage as a funder, accelerator and connector. Last year, VertueLab supported 120 founders through various programs, helped win nearly $30 million in grant funds, and saw a cumulative 781 jobs created by its portfolio companies. VertueLab also co-founded the first ever Seattle Climate Innovation Hub, which is home to more than 150 climate-focused companies.

Abiodun has previously launched startups providing climate tech financing and consulting in the sector, served as CEO of a Berlin wellness company, and led brand strategy and been a creative producer for multiple companies, among other roles.

Shelia Stafford is CEO of TeamSense, a software platform used by employers for absence reporting and employee communications. The tech is SMS text-based, with no app to download, zero training and available in employees’ native language. It serves hundreds of thousands of frontline workers across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, universities, stadium operations, mining, and more. 

Advertisement

Stafford’s background includes three years at General Motors as a project manager and engineer as well as almost 10 years at Whirlpool Corp. She was also director of the innovation studio at Everett, Wash.-based industrial giant Fortive.

Karen Huh is co-founder and CEO of Zucca, a startup that uses generative AI to help food and beverage companies reimagine product development. Spun out of Pioneer Square Labs in March 2025, Zucca raised a $5 million seed round last July, and in February launched Smart Specs and Smart NFP (patent pending), which together keep formulas, nutrition fact panels, specs, and more connected and true. The features are already in use at food and beverage brands managing active product pipelines.

Huh was previously CEO at Joywell Foods. She also spent more than 10 years at Starbucks, was a VP at Bulletproof 360, and was an entrepreneur in residence at PSL.

Luis Poggi is co-founder and CEO of HouseWhisper, a real estate tech startup that uses AI to help alleviate the administrative overload that bogs some agents down. HouseWhisper emerged from Stealth last year with $10 million in funding to back its conversational AI that acts as the ultimate 24/7 personal assistant, helping agents stay organized with help on following up with clients, scheduling, CRM updates and more. 

Advertisement

Poggi rose to VP of product and engineering during his more than 10 years at Zillow. He previously spent close to three years at online travel giant Expedia.

Astound Business Solutions is the presenting sponsor of the 2026 GeekWire Awards. Thanks also to gold sponsors Amazon Sustainability, BairdBECU, JLLFirst Tech and Wilson Sonsini, and silver sponsors Prime Team Partners.

The event will feature a VIP reception, sit-down dinner and fun entertainment mixed in. Tickets go fast. A limited number of half-table and full-table sponsorships are available. Contact events@geekwire.com to reserve a spot for your team today.

(function(t,e,s,n){var o,a,c;t.SMCX=t.SMCX||[],e.getElementById(n)||(o=e.getElementsByTagName(s),a=o[o.length-1],c=e.createElement(s),c.type=”text/javascript”,c.async=!0,c.id=n,c.src=”https://widget.surveymonkey.com/collect/website/js/tRaiETqnLgj758hTBazgd5M58tggxeII7bOlSeQcq8A_2FgMSV6oauwlPEL4WBj_2Fnb.js”,a.parentNode.insertBefore(c,a))})(window,document,”script”,”smcx-sdk”); Create your own user feedback survey

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

KEF Muo (2nd Gen) Review

Published

on

Verdict

Taken on its own terms there’s a whole lot to like about the KEF Muo and not a great deal to take issue with. But nothing happens in isolation – and the little shortcomings this speaker demonstrates means it’s under threat from some slightly more well-rounded alternatives…

  • Insightful, rhythmically positive sound of impressive scale

  • Impressive all-round specification

  • Extremely well-made and -finished

  • Midrange reproduction is relatively blunt and approaching strident

  • Plenty of very capable alternatives

  • Rather brief control app

Key Features

  • Advertisement

    Power

    40 watts of Class D

  • Advertisement

    Connections

    aptX Adaptive and USB-C

  • Advertisement

    Water resistance

    IP67 rating

Introduction

It’s been a full 10 years since KEF launched its original Muo Bluetooth speaker, a wireless speaker that back then, promised a high-end performance at a premium price.

Advertisement

Since 2016 the company has enjoyed an enviable strike-rate where its new products are concerned – so does the 2nd Gen Muo chalk up another hit?

Advertisement

Design

Its dimensions, relatively light weight and very promising IP rating would tend to indicate the KEF Muo is a go-anywhere, do-anything kind of Bluetooth speaker. And it’s true, it’s built to survive in any realistic environment and to be no kind of hindrance when it comes to getting there or coming back again.

But bear in mind the majority of the Muo is built from smooth, tactile and exquisitely finished aluminium. The sort of material, in fact, that it’s not especially difficult to mark or scratch or even dent. So if you do intend to take your speaker with you into the Great Outdoors, be aware that there are devices that lend themselves much more readily to being slung into a backpack and bounced around in there than this one.

Advertisement
KEF Muo 2nd Gen designKEF Muo 2nd Gen design
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

And you’ll want to keep it pristine, because in any of the available finishes the Muo (to my eyes, at least) looks the business. I wouldn’t necessarily choose the Midnight Black of my review sample, but I’d happily take any of the Silver Dusk, Moss Green, Blue Aura, Cocoa Brown or Orange Moon alternatives.

There are some physical controls integrated into the rubber end-cap at the top of the speaker – they cover power on/off and volume up/down, and there’s a multifunction button that takes care of skip forwards/backwards, play/pause and answer/end/reject call (the mic that turns this into a speakerphone features noise- and echo-cancellation technology). There’s also a button to initiate Bluetooth pairing at the rear of the speaker – it’s just next to the USB-C slot.

Advertisement

KEF Muo 2nd Gen build qualityKEF Muo 2nd Gen build quality
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Features

  • Bluetooth 5.4 with aptX Adaptive
  • 40 watts of Class D power
  • Auracast-enabled

There are a couple of ways of getting audio information on board the Muo. The USB-C slot at the rear of the cabinet can be used for data transfer as well as charging the battery, and wireless connectivity is dealt with by Bluetooth 5.4 that’s compatible with the SBC, AAC and aptX Adaptive codecs. These options can deal with 16-bit/48Hz and 24-bit/48Hz resolutions respectively.

And there are further connectivity options. The Muo is Auracast-enabled, so can be part of an extremely expansive system as long as it’s partnered correctly. Two Muo (Muos?) can form a stereo pair. And both Microsoft Swift Pair and Google Fast Pair are available, too.

KEF Muo 2nd Gen BluetoothKEF Muo 2nd Gen Bluetooth
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Once the digital audio information is on board, it’s delivered by a two-driver array powered by a total of 40 Class D watts. A 20mm tweeter takes up 10 of those watts, the other 30 is taken by a 117mm x 58mm racetrack mid/bass driver that features the company’s P-Flex technology – this arrangement, says KEF, results in a frequency response of 43Hz – 20kHz.

There’s an accelerometer built into the Muo which allows it to detect its orientation and adjust its sound output accordingly. In portrait position, the tweeter is above the mid/bass driver; put the speaker into landscape orientation (it is fitted with four small rubber feet for this purpose) and obviously the drivers are now side-by-side.

Advertisement

Advertisement

KEF Muo 2nd Gen appKEF Muo 2nd Gen app
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

You can also exert control over the Muo by using the KEF Connect app. In this guise it deals only with input selection and volume control, but it does at least give access to five EQ presets and an indication of battery life too.

Battery life is quoted at 24 hours from a single charge (at moderate volume levels, naturally), and should the worst happen you can go from flat to full in around two hours via the USB-C input. A quick 15-minute burst should be enough to get another three hours of playback (again, provided you’re not going for it where volume levels are concerned).

Sound Quality

  • Nicely shaped and varied low-frequency response
  • Sizeable and detailed presentation
  • Can sound slightly strident, especially through the midrange

For a relatively compact speaker in physical terms, the sound the Muo makes is anything but discreet. No matter if you give it a bog-standard 320kbps MP3 file of Private Life by Grace Jones to deal with or a bigger 24-bit/44.1kHz FLAC file of By Storm’s Dead Weight, the KEF sounds big and spacious, and delivers a presentation that easily escapes the confines of its cabinet.

It extracts and reveals plenty of detail, both broad and fine, at every stage of the frequency range – which goes a long way to convincing you, as the listener, that you’re getting a full account of what’s going on.

Advertisement

Advertisement
KEF Muo 2nd Gen controlsKEF Muo 2nd Gen controls
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Down at the bottom end there’s a lot of information regarding texture made available, and bass sounds are nicely shaped and controlled too – so as well as an impressive amount of variation at the low end, rhythms are expressed with genuine positivity. It’s a similar story at the opposite end, inasmuch as treble sounds have shape and substance to go along with a fair amount of bite – and harmonic variation is apparent at every turn.

As well as the more understated dynamics of harmonic fluctuations, the Muo is also quite adept at dealing with the big dynamic variations that come when a recording ramps up the volume or the intensity. It has no problem tracking changes in attack, and maintains the distance between quiet and loud even if you’re listening quite loud in the first place.

Turning the volume up doesn’t alter the evenness of the frequency response or harm the natural, neutral tonality the speaker demonstrates at either end of the frequency range, either.

KEF Muo 2nd Gen playbackKEF Muo 2nd Gen playback
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

In the midrange, though, things aren’t quite so clear-cut. There’s still an admirable amount of detail available, and the transition from the midrange to the stuff going on either side of it, is smoothly and naturalistically achieved.

Advertisement

But there’s not a huge amount in common where tonality is concerned – the way the KEF hands over the midrange in general, and voices in particular, isn’t in absolute sympathy with the bass or treble reproduction. There’s a mild abrasiveness to the tonality here, which can result in voices becoming slightly strident or, in extremis, actually rather hard-edged and unyielding.  

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

You value the look and the feel of your Bluetooth speaker as much as you value the sound

Advertisement

You’re after the best sound

You’re after an entirely even-handed and uncoloured account of your music

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

KEF has been out of the Bluetooth speaker conversation for quite a while – but the quality of the products it has launched since it last had a Bluetooth speaker in its line-up made me very optimistic about the new Muo’s chances.
 
I’m in no doubt that it’s one of the more covetable and more desirable designs around – but the question of whether it sounds like £249-worth is not quite so straightforward to answer, especially not if you’ve heard the Bang & Olufsen A1 3rd Gen in action…

How We Test

I listen to the Muo on my desk, in the kitchen, and in the garden (during those few moments when it isn’t raining sideways around here). I connect it wirelessly to an Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and to a FiiO M15S which allows the use of the aptX codec.

I also hard-wire it to an Apple MacBook Pro (running Colibro software) using its USB-C slot.

FAQs

Is this a hi-res speaker?
Advertisement

Kind of, sort of – aptX Adaptive can operate at a lossy 24-bit/48Hz and the USB-C slot can deal with 16-bit/48Hz

Can I charge it wirelessly?

No, it can only be charged via its USB-C input

Advertisement

Advertisement

Full Specs

  KEF Muo (2nd Gen) Review
UK RRP £249
USA RRP $249
EU RRP €269
CA RRP CA$349
AUD RRP AU$449
Manufacturer KEF
IP rating IP67
Battery Hours 24
Fast Charging Yes
Size (Dimensions) 82 x 59 x 216 MM
Weight 740 G
Release Date 2026
Audio Resolution SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Driver (s) 20mm tweeter, 58 x 117mm mid/bass
Ports USB-C
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.4
Colours Midnight Black, Silver Dusk, Moss Green, Blue Aura, Cocoa Brown, Orange Moon
Frequency Range 43 20000 – Hz
Speaker Type Portable Speaker

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Max severity Flowise RCE vulnerability now exploited in attacks

Published

on

Max severity Flowise RCE vulnerability now exploited in attacks

Hackers are exploiting a maximum-severity vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-59528, in the open-source platform Flowise for building custom LLM apps and agentic systems to execute arbitrary code.

The flaw allows injecting JavaScript code without any security checks and was publicly disclosed last September, with the warning that successful exploitation leads to command execution and file system access.

The problem is with the Flowise CustomMCP node allowing configuration settings to connect to an external Model Context Protocol (MCP) server and unsafely evaluating the mcpServerConfig input from the user. During this process, it can execute JavaScript without first validating its safety.

Wiz

The developer addressed the issue in Flowise version 3.0.6. The latest current version is 3.1.1, released two weeks ago.

Flowise is an open-source, low-code platform for building AI agents and LLM-based workflows. It provides a drag-and-drop interface that lets users connect components into pipelines powering chatbots, automation, and AI systems.

Advertisement

It is used by a broad range of users, including developers working in AI prototyping, non-technical users working with no-code toolsets, and companies that operate customer support chatbots and knowledge-based assistants.

Caitlin Condon, security researcher at vulnerability intelligence company VulnCheck, announced on LinkedIn that exploitation of CVE-2025-59528 has been detected by their Canary network.

“Early this morning, VulnCheck’s Canary network began detecting first-time exploitation of CVE-2025-59528, a CVSS-10 arbitrary JavaScript code injection vulnerability in Flowise, an open-source AI development platform,” Condon warned.

Although the activity appears limited at this time, originating from a single Starlink IP, the researchers warned that there are between 12,000 and 15,000 Flowise instances exposed online right now.

Advertisement

However, it is unclear what percentage of those are vulnerable Flowise servers.

Condon notes that the observed activity related to CVE-2025-59528 occurs in addition to CVE-2025-8943 and CVE-2025-26319, which also impact Flowise and for which active exploitation in the wild has been observed.

Currently, VulnCheck provides exploit samples, network signatures, and YARA rules only to its customers.

Users of Flowise are recommended to upgrade to version 3.1.1 or at least 3.0.6 as soon as possible. They should also consider removing their instances from the public internet if external access is not needed.

Advertisement

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HexemBio raises $10.4M for a stem cell rejuvenation therapy

Published

on

The Berkeley biotech is backing a Nature-published approach that recreates the embryonic environment where blood stem cells first form, rather than reprogramming aged cells chemically or genetically. Its lead programme targets bone marrow transplant in blood cancers and has received FDA Orphan Drug Designation.


HexemBio has publicly launched with a $10.4 million seed round led by Draper Associates, with participation from SOSV, Seraphim, and other investors. The Berkeley and New York-based company is developing what it describes as the first blood stem cell rejuvenation therapy, built around a platform called the Synthetic Human Yolk Sac.

Rather than editing or chemically reprogramming aged haematopoietic stem cells, the technology temporarily places a patient’s own cells into a recreated version of the developmental environment where blood stem cells first emerge in the embryo, then returns them via standard IV infusion.

Haematopoietic stem cells sit deep in the bone marrow and give rise to every blood and immune cell in the human body. Their decline with age is linked to weakened immunity, chronic inflammation, and increased susceptibility to conditions including blood cancers and neurodegeneration.

Advertisement

Previous attempts to reverse this decline have typically involved transcription-factor reprogramming, cytokine treatments, or gene editing, approaches that can push cells into unstable states or carry safety risks HexemBio says its method sidesteps.

The Synthetic Human Yolk Sac recreates the microenvironment that generates the body’s first blood stem cells during early embryonic development. Foundational work supporting the platform was published in Nature in February 2024, by a team led by Mo Ebrahimkhani at the University of Pittsburgh, with Samira Kiani and Joshua Hislop among the authors. All three are now co-founders of HexemBio.

The company’s lead clinical programme targets bone marrow transplant in patients with blood cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

HexemBio received FDA Orphan Drug Designation for this indication in July 2025 and completed its FDA Pre-IND meeting in January 2026. First-in-human trials are targeted for 2027.

Regulatory strategy focuses on bone marrow transplant outcomes because ageing itself is not currently recognised as a regulatory indication, a constraint that has shaped how several longevity-adjacent biotechs have structured their early clinical programmes.

Advertisement

The founding team spans MIT, UC Berkeley, Harvard, and Y Combinator. Gabriel Levesque Tremblay, a former YC founder and UC Berkeley postdoc, serves as CEO. Samira Kiani, a Presidential Early Career Award recipient who trained at MIT, is CTO.

Mo Ebrahimkhani, the inventor of the underlying technology and a pioneer in synthetic developmental biology, is CSO. Joshua Hislop, whose doctoral work contributed directly to the Nature publication, leads the company’s AI platform, which includes proprietary tools called YolkGPT and YolkScore. Samet Yildirim, a former YC founder with drug development experience at Boehringer Ingelheim, is chief business officer.

The advisory board includes Robert S. Langer, Institute Professor at MIT and co-founder of Moderna, who called the approach “fundamentally different from transcription-factor reprogramming or gene editing’ and said the early data were ‘extremely compelling.”

Further advisors include Peter Barton Hutt, former chief counsel of the FDA and current Moderna board member; Joanne Kurtzberg of Duke University, one of the leading bone marrow transplant clinicians in the US; David Harris, founder of the first public cord blood bank in the United States; Felipe Sierra, former director of the Division of Aging Biology at the NIH; Jens Nielsen, CEO of the BioInnovation Institute; and George Church, professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Colossal Biosciences.

Advertisement

Seed funding will be used to complete IND-enabling studies and GMP manufacturing ahead of the 2027 trial target.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

New Revelations Reignite Crypto Scandal Involving Argentina’s President Milei

Published

on

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times: President Javier Milei of Argentina promoted a cryptocurrency last year that quickly skyrocketed in value then cratered just as fast, costing investors millions of dollars and setting off a scandal and an investigation. Mr. Milei said he was simply highlighting a private venture and had no connection to the digital coin called $Libra. New evidence is now raising questions about his assertion. Phone logs from a federal investigation by Argentine prosecutors into the coin’s collapse show seven phone calls between Mr. Milei and one of the entrepreneurs behind the cryptocurrency on the night in 2025 when Mr. Milei posted about $Libra on X. The contents of the calls, which took place before and after Mr. Milei’s post, are not known.

But the phone logs — which were obtained by The New York Times and first reported by a local cable news channel, C5N — suggest a greater degree of communication between Mr. Milei and the entrepreneurs who launched the token than what the president has publicly acknowledged. Newly uncovered messages also suggest Mr. Milei received regular payments from one of the entrepreneurs while he was a congressman. Mr. Milei has not publicly commented on the call logs and other documents, and he did not respond to a request for comment. He is named as a person of interest in the federal prosecutor’s continuing investigation into the digital coin, according to court documents reviewed by The Times, but has not been formally charged with any crime. The latest revelations have revived a scandal that threatens the very foundation of a president who rose to power and was elected president in 2023 by attacking a political class he called corrupt.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Google’s AI mental health features feel helpful – but not enough alone

Published

on

Google is sharpening its focus on mental health safety with a key update to its Gemini platform, introducing a “one-touch” crisis support feature designed to connect users with real-world help faster. The move is part of a broader push to ensure AI tools act responsibly in sensitive situations, especially when users may be experiencing distress.

At the core of this update is a redesigned safety mechanism that activates when Gemini detects signals of potential mental health crises, including self-harm or suicidal thoughts. Instead of continuing a standard AI conversation, the system shifts toward immediate intervention. Users are presented with a simplified interface that allows them to instantly reach out to professional support through calls, texts, live chat, or official crisis hotline websites.

What makes this approach notable is its persistence

Once the one-touch interface is triggered, access to crisis support remains visible throughout the conversation, ensuring users are continually encouraged to seek human help rather than relying solely on AI-generated responses. The design prioritizes urgency and ease of access, reducing friction at moments when quick action can be critical.

This update reflects a growing recognition that AI must do more than provide information – it must actively guide users toward safe outcomes. Google says the system has been developed in collaboration with clinical experts, ensuring that responses are structured to encourage help-seeking behavior without reinforcing harmful thoughts or actions.

Advertisement

Importantly, Gemini is also being trained to avoid validating dangerous beliefs or behaviors

Instead, it aims to gently redirect users, distinguish between subjective feelings and objective reality, and prioritize connections to real-world resources. This balance between responsiveness and restraint is central to the platform’s evolving safety framework.

The significance of this feature lies in its potential real-world impact. With over one billion people globally affected by mental health challenges, digital tools like Gemini are increasingly becoming the first points of contact during vulnerable moments. By embedding a one-touch pathway to professional support, Google is attempting to bridge the gap between online interaction and offline care.

For users, this means faster, more direct access to help when it matters most. The update reduces the burden of searching for resources and ensures that support options are presented clearly and immediately.

Looking ahead, Google plans to continue refining these guardrails through ongoing research, testing, and collaboration with mental health professionals. As AI becomes more integrated into everyday life, features like one-touch crisis support could play a crucial role in shaping how technology responds to human vulnerability – prioritizing safety, accountability, and real-world connection over convenience alone.

What we think

Google’s AI mental health features feel like a step in the right direction, especially with tools that quickly guide users toward real-world help. The one-touch crisis support and improved responses show a clear intent to prioritize safety over engagement.

Advertisement

But there’s an inherent limitation here – AI can assist, but it cannot replace human empathy, clinical judgment, or long-term care. For someone in distress, a well-timed prompt helps, but it’s not a solution. These tools work best as bridges, not endpoints. The real challenge is ensuring users don’t stop at AI interaction and actually reach professional support when it truly matters.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Authorities disrupt router DNS hijacks used to steal Microsoft 365 logins

Published

on

Authorities disrupt DNS hijacks used to steal Microsoft 365 logins

An international operation from law enforcement authorities in partnership with private companies has disrupted FrostArmada, an APT28 campaign hijacking local traffic from MikroTik and TP-Link routers to steal Microsoft account credentials.

The Russian threat group APT28, also tracked as Fancy Bear, Sofacy, Forest Blizzard, Strontium, Storm-2754, and Sednit, has been linked to Russia’s General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) 85th Main Special Service Center (GTsSS) military unit 26165.

In the FrostArmada attacks, the hackers compromised mainly small office/home office (SOHO) routers and altered the domain name system (DNS) settings to point to virtual private servers (VPS) under their control, which acted as DNS resolvers.

Wiz

This allowed APT28 to intercept authentication traffic to targeted domains and steal Microsoft logins and OAuth tokens.

At its peak in December 2025, FrostArmada infected 18,000 devices across 120 countries, primarily targeting government agencies, law enforcement, IT and hosting providers, and organizations operating their own servers.

Advertisement

Microsoft, whose services were targeted by this campaign, worked together with Black Lotus Labs (BLL), Lumen’s threat research and operations division, to map the malicious activity and identify victims.

With support from the FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Polish government, the offending infrastructure has been taken offline.

FrostArmada activity

The attackers targeted internet-exposed routers, primarily MikroTik and TP-Link, as well as some firewall products from Nethesis and older Fortinet models.

Once compromised, the devices communicated with the attackers’ infrastructure and received DNS configuration changes that redirected traffic to malicious VPS nodes.

Advertisement

The new DNS settings were automatically pushed to internal devices via the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP).

When clients queried authentication-related domains the threat actor targeted, the DNS server returned the attacker’s IP instead of the real one, redirecting victims to an adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) proxy.

DNS request redirection at the router level
DNS request redirection at the router level
Source: Black Lotus Labs

The only visible sign of fraud for the victim would have been a warning for an invalid TLS certificate, which could have easily been dismissed. However, ignoring the alert gave the threat actor access to the victim’s unencrypted internet communication.

“The actor essentially ran a proxy service as the AitM that the end user was directed to via DNS,” Lumen’s Black Lotus Labs researchers explain.

“The only sign of this attack would be a pop-up warning about connecting to an untrusted source because of the ‘break and inspect’ configuration.”

Advertisement

“If warnings were present and ignored or clicked through, the actor proxied requests to the legitimate services, collecting the data at the midpoint and collecting data associated with the targeted account by passing the valid OAuth token.”

In some cases, though, the hackers spoofed DNS responses for certain domains, thus forcing affected endpoints to connect to the attack infrastructures, Microsoft says in a report today.

Lumen reports that FrostArmada operated in two distinct clusters, one called the ‘Expansion team’ dedicated to device compromise and botnet growth, and the second handling the AiTM and credential collection operations.

Overview of the Expansion branch operations
Overview of the Expansion branch operations
Source: Black Lotus Labs

The researchers report that FrostArmada activity increased sharply following an August 2025 report from the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) in the UK describing a Forest Blizzard toolset that targeted Microsoft account credentials and tokens.

Microsoft confirmed that APT28 carried out AitM attacks against domains associated with the Microsoft 365 service, as subdomains for Microsoft Outlook on the web have also been targeted.

Advertisement

Additionally, the company observed this activity on servers belonging to three government organizations in Africa that were not hosted on Microsoft infrastructure. In those attacks, “Forest Blizzard intercepted DNS requests and conducted follow-on collection.”

Black Lotus Labs also observed the threat actor targeting entities with on-premise email servers and “a small number of government organizations” in North Africa, Central America, and Southeast Asia.

The researchers note that “there was also a connection to a national identity platform in one European country.”

In a report today, the UK agency says that the AitM activity impacted both browser sessions and desktop applications, and the DNS hijacking is believed to have been opportunistic in nature to build a large pool of potential targets and then filtering those of interest.

Advertisement

Black Lotus Labs has published a small set of indicators of compromise for the VPS servers used during the FrostArmada campaign:


Advertisement



Advertisement



Advertisement



IP address First Seen Last Seen
64.120.31[.]96 May 19, 2025 March 31, 2026
79.141.160[.]78 July 19, 2025 March 31, 2026
23.106.120[.]119 July 19, 2025 March 31, 2026
79.141.173[.]211 July 19, 2025 March 31, 2026
185.117.89[.]32 September 9, 2025 September 9, 2025
185.237.166[.]55 December 30, 2025 December 30, 2025

The researchers note that defenders should implement certificate pinning for corporate devices (laptops, mobile phones) controlled via an MDM solution, which would generate an error when the attacker tries to intercept and analyze traffic on their VPS infrastructure.

Advertisement

Another recommendation is to minimize the attack surface through patching, limiting exposure on the public web, and removing all end-of-life equipment.

Microsoft and the NCSC also provide a list of IoCs and protection guidance to help defenders identify and prevent DNS hijacking attacks.

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Volkswagens May Be Getting More Expensive For Americans

Published

on





Volkswagen Group may have to rethink its strategy in North America, which could mean raising the price of its vehicles in the United States, due to the country’s high tariffs on vehicles imported from Mexico

Volkswagen is running out of options, and it may have to look reorganizing its production structure in Mexico to cut costs, while also launching new models across its brands that could better compete in the current market. CEO Oliver Blume also stated that VW is attempting to negotiate a solution that would let them keep their production in Mexico without punitive tariffs.

Advertisement

With VW’s production no longer saving money, so it may have to look outside of its own processes to shift the burden. It’s possible that consumers may take part of the hit for Volkswagen, with prices of its models increasing in the United States to offset some of the tariffs.

The automaker has also been expanding into the American market, in a roundabout way, by reviving the American brand Scout Motors, which has an electric SUV and pickup planned. Unfortunately, the profits from these vehicles won’t come in time to relieve Volkswagen from the current tariffs. Volkswagen is set to become a much more expensive car brand in the U.S. due to these tariffs.

Advertisement

Why is Volkswagen so heavily impacted by tariffs?

Mexico is currently where Volkswagen produces 70% of its cars, shipping them across the border for U.S. customers. The 27.5% tariffs on vehicles imported from Mexico into the United States cost Volkswagen $3.3 billion in 2025 alone. VW’s profits have also declined, with sales dropping by 12%, putting the automaker in a pretty tough spot. “It is is no longer economically viable to export many vehicles from Mexico to the U.S.,” Blume stated

However, moving out of Mexico isn’t an option. Blume already stated that Volkswagen won’t “invest billions” in moving production to the United States, adding it would take years. Currently, VW has the Volkswagen de Mexico complex in Puebla that manufactured a total of 335,716 vehicles in 2025, including the Jetta, Tiguan, and Taos, as well as an engine plant in Silao that can make more than 2,500 engines a day, and Audi’s assembly plant in San Jose Chiapa, which largely produces the Audi Q5. With VW being so localized in Mexico, it seems that customers could end up cushioning some of the blow for its vehicles imported into the U.S.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why Ford Says New Mustang GTD Owners Shouldn’t Drive Their Cars For 30 Days

Published

on





The Ford Mustang GTD is unquestionably the halo performance car in Ford’s lineup right now. It has the same basic shape as a Mustang, but under its skin, it’s much more like a supercar than your standard-issue Mustang. Taking ownership of one of these 800-horsepower, exotic Mustangs is not an easy process. 

For starters, you’ll have to shell out the approximately $350,000 that the GTD costs, and that’s only if you’re lucky enough to get the opportunity. Ford requires prospective Mustang GTD buyers to submit an application, through which the company determines who the GTD allocations will go to. Should you be fortunate enough to have your Mustang GTD application accepted so you can begin the order process and later take delivery of your car, Ford then recommends that owners wait an additional 30 days after delivery before they actually drive their GTD on the road.

Advertisement

The reason is not for something mechanical; it’s because of the paint on the GTD’s unique carbon fiber body panels, which Ford says needs an additional 30 days to cure before any sort of paint protection film (PPF) is applied. The Mustang GTD’s body is wider and more aggressive than the regular Mustang’s and uses carbon fiber panels throughout. The car’s fenders, hood, trunk lid, roof, and door sills are all made of the exotic, lightweight material — to which Ford then applies the paint color of the customer’s choice, with nearly unlimited custom options for buyers who want something out of the ordinary.

Advertisement

What’s an extra 30 days?

Because of the carbon-painted panels, Ford recommends Mustang GTD owners wait the extra time before driving their cars. More specifically, owners should wait 30 days after delivery before applying paint protection film. PPF is a clear film that’s used to protect paint jobs from long-term sun and water damage, as well as the inevitable rock chips and road grime you get while driving. It’s a popular addition for cars of all types these days, and most would agree that PPF is a necessity on a car as rare and expensive as a Mustang GTD. Even more so with the likelihood of the car’s extra-wide tires throwing up rocks onto the paint.

If you were to ignore Ford’s advice and apply PPF to the car before the paint has fully cured, it could result in permanent air bubbles and other long-term paint damage — which is undesirable on any car, and even more so on a Mustang GTD. The good news is that experienced PPF installers should be able to look at the car and know exactly when the paint has cured.

It might be a bummer take delivery of your brand-new, carbon-bodied Mustang GTD and then have to wait to go for a spirited drive. We’re assuming most owners will be fine waiting an extra 30 days before enjoying their cars. Because if you’ve already gone through the long process of having your application chosen and then spec’ing out your dream GTD build, what’s an extra 30 days of patience?

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This NAS drive helped me get control of my spiralling subscription costs

Published

on

Cloud services like Google Drive and iCloud are fantastic – they let me access my most important files from any device, anywhere – but the free storage is never enough. 

Google offers 15GB while Apple offers an even more paltry 5GB of storage – but even the biggest ‘free’ tier isn’t enough for the vast majority of users with thousands of photos and videos, countless files and more to keep safe. 

So what do you do? You start paying, of course. It starts off cheap with the lowest tier paid option – £1.59/$1.99 for 100GB, in the case of Google’s cloud storage – and that’s enough to tide you over. For a while, anyway. 

As sure as day follows night, over time, you’ll begin to fill all that storage space back up – even if you delete files you no longer need. Slowly, all those holiday snaps, videos of nights out, and even work documents, all add up.

Advertisement

And with both Google and Apple, it also includes storage linked to associated services like Gmail or iCloud, so any large files you receive in your inbox further add to your quota.

Advertisement

Again, you have no choice but to upgrade to the next tier of storage, which for Google, is 200GB for £2.49/$2.99 per month. That’s not bad, but go above that limit and you’ll face a massive jump not only in storage but also in monthly cost, at a whopping £7.99/$9.99 per month for 2TB. 

Like our growing storage needs, it adds up over time. That’s just under £96/$120 per year if you pay for the 2TB option monthly, just to store your files.

Advertisement

And so on, and so on. It’s a never-ending loop of filling up storage and paying for more. It’s either that or say goodbye to years of precious memories. 

Pay up, or lose access

The worst part about Google and Apple’s monopoly on the cloud storage market is that they don’t just handle storage – they’re central to the digital experience for many of us. Google, for example, handles not just Drive but Gmail, Docs, Sheets and more, while Apple similarly handles iCloud email, iMessage and the like.

That may not sound like a big problem – one subscription covers multiple apps, after all – but it is once you start running out of storage. 

Advertisement

Advertisement
Google One low storage reminderGoogle One low storage reminder
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

No matter whether you’re in camp Apple or Google, if you run out of storage or miss a monthly payment, you don’t just lose the ability to upload new files to your cloud storage – it also locks you out of other services. 

That means no access to Gmail or iMessage if you don’t pay up, and those are pretty central to the online experience for many. 

That’s too much power for my liking – but what was I supposed to do? I have over 30,000 photos and 5,000 videos tied to my Google Drive account, as well as thousands of emails linked to my Gmail over the years. The answer was simple in the end; get a NAS drive.   

UGreen’s latest NAS is the perfect remedy

NAS drives were all the rage in computing before the days of cloud storage, offering oodles of local storage accessible via your home network. But despite a lull in interest over the past few years, the hardware is more capable than ever. 

UGreen NASync DH4300 Plus on a shelfUGreen NASync DH4300 Plus on a shelf
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

That’s certainly the case with the UGreen NASync DH4300 Plus, which was released at the tail-end of 2025. 

Advertisement

The bigger brother to the DH2300, the DH4300 Plus is a four-bay SATA NAS drive that supports up to 120TB of storage – 30TB per drive – for frankly massive amounts of storage. It’s powered by an 8-core processor and sports 8GB of RAM to keep things running smoothly, and its 2.5GbE LAN port boasts transfer speeds of up to 312.5MB/s depending on your home setup. Safe to say, it’s a bit of a beast. 

UGreen NASync DH4300 Plus internal baysUGreen NASync DH4300 Plus internal bays
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

But despite its intimidating spec sheet, it was an absolute breeze to set up; all I had to do was insert the HDDs, plug it into my router via the provided high-speed Ethernet cable and power it on. From there, everything else was handled via the UGreen NAS companion app, and setup took no more than a couple of minutes – a far cry from the early days of NAS drive networking setup. 

That’s when I could start, what I affectionately called Operation Get Away From Google Drive As Soon As Possible, or OGAFGDASAP. Catchy, I know.

Advertisement

Getting out from Google’s clutches

This part was surprisingly easy; thanks to EU rules (gotta love the Europeans), cloud storage providers like Google and Apple have to make it easy to either download all your data or transfer it to another (ideally cheaper) service. 

Advertisement

For me, that meant going to Google Takeout, selecting the data I wanted to download – my Google Photos library and my Drive contents – and requesting a download link. Once I had the link, I downloaded the (frankly massive) nearly 300GB of data on my PC, and extracted the ZIP files to my NAS drive via my home network. 

Photos on the UGreen appPhotos on the UGreen app
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

But why stop at Google? I also pay for iCloud storage for when I’m testing the best iPhones, and that isn’t all that often, so I repeated the process, this time with iCloud. 

Now, that did introduce a few issues – the biggest being duplicate photos where the images were backed up on both Apple and Google cloud servers – but UGreen likely anticipated this issue. There’s baked-in AI accessible via the companion app on both PC and mobile that lets you easily identify and delete duplicate photos. It cleared nearly 10,000 duplicate images for me in the space of a few minutes. 

UGreen app duplicate photo menuUGreen app duplicate photo menu
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Now, all I have to do is open the UGreen companion app on my phone, and all my photos and videos are there waiting for me, complete with features like custom folders and facial recognition we’ve come to expect from the big platforms. 

And despite being linked to my home network, I can access my files from anywhere with an internet connection via UGreen’s cloud service network. It doesn’t actually store your files in the cloud; rather, it just provides cloud-based access to the drive, which means you don’t need to faff around with port forwarding as you do with more basic drives. 

Advertisement

Not just for network storage either

Now the beauty of the UGreen NASync DH4300 Plus is that it’s not just for network storage. With a fairly powerful spec under the hood, the NAS drive can also run full apps that can massively expand what it can do.

It meant that, rather than splashing out £112 for a Home Assistant Green to get more advanced control over my smart home tech, I could install and run it directly from my NAS drive – with great results, might I add.

UGreen app menuUGreen app menu
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It’s not the only app either; there’s actually an app store accessible via the app that gives you access to a range of apps including a Google Docs, Sheets and Slides alternative called Online Office that you can access via browser from any PC, further reducing my reliance on Google’s cloud-based services. 

Advertisement

There’s also Docker support, so depending on your level of tech knowledge, you can run other custom apps directly from the NAS.

Advertisement

Yes, it’s an expensive upfront cost, but it’ll save you a lot in the long run, and with the UGreen DH4300 Plus specifically, there’s much more to it than simply acting as a way to back up your photos and videos. Goodbye, Google Drive. I definitely won’t miss you.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Starfish Space raises $110M to scale up its satellite servicing missions

Published

on

Illustration: Starfish Space Otter space vehicle in orbit with Earth's full disk in background
An artist’s conception shows Starfish Space’s Otter satellite servicing vehicle in geostationary Earth orbit. (Starfish Space Illustration)

Tukwila, Wash.-based Starfish Space says it has raised about $110 million in a funding round that will help the company execute its first satellite servicing missions and scale up operations for more business.

The Series B round was led by Point72 Ventures. Activate Capital and Shield Capital were co-leaders of the round. Additional major participants included Industrious Ventures and NightDragon. The round also drew support from several existing Starfish investors (NFX, Munich Re Ventures, Toyota Ventures and PSL Ventures) as well as new investors (Nomi Capital, Gaingels and Overlap Holdings). 

The new capital adds to previous funding rounds announced in 2021, 2023 and 2024, and pushes Starfish’s total investment past the $150 million mark.

Starfish Space was founded in 2019 by engineers Austin Link and Trevor Bennett, two veterans of Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin space venture. The company has developed a space vehicle called Otter, which is designed to rendezvous and dock with other objects in orbit — either to maneuver them into a different orbit or guide them to safe disposal.

The company demonstrated its technologies during a software test in 2025, code-named Remora, and during two orbital test missions involving scaled-down Otter Pup prototypes.

Advertisement

Starfish already has several Otter missions under contract, including:

“Closing this round reflects the real momentum we are seeing across both our technology and our customer base,” Link said in a news release. “We have Otter missions under contract, successful demos, and our first operational mission launching this year. We’re ready to help organizations get the most out of their on-orbit infrastructure.”

Starfish said it will use proceeds from the investment round to execute contracted Otter missions, scale the Otter business line to meet customer demand and grow the company’s team, which currently has more than 90 employees.

“From our perspective, Starfish has made steady progress toward practical on‑orbit servicing,” said Chris Morales, partner at Point72 Ventures. “We believe their early traction with defense and commercial customers and successful autonomous missions show these capabilities are becoming increasingly relevant to space operations and national security.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025