Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Hobbit-like Humans May Have Scavenged Komodo Dragons’ Leftovers to Survive

Published

on

CNN reports:


Prehistoric human relatives, nicknamed “hobbits” due to their short stature, may have been scavengers, rather than skilled hunters capable of taking down big game or building cooking fires, according to new research. The study adds to growing evidence that Homo floresiensis, which had a brain only slightly bigger than that of a chimpanzee, wasn’t as advanced as scientists previously believed….

The researchers believe that much like how Komodo dragons hunt water buffaloes today, they were using their venomous bite to take down Stegodons — and after the scene was clear, Homo floresiensis swept in to cleave meat from what remained… The new study reinforces a long-held suspicion that Homo floresiensis is not a dwarfed form of Homo erectus but a descendant of a more primitive Homo habilis-like or Australopithecus-like form that arrived on the island more than1 million years ago, said Dr. Chris Stringer, a research leader specializing in human origins and paleoanthropology at London’s Natural History Museum.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

How to reserve and change your WhatsApp username

Published

on

Meta-owned chat app WhatsApp started to roll out username reservations for its 3 billion users earlier in June. The username feature is not active, but you can claim your username and start using it whenever the feature becomes available this year.

With usernames, people will be able to share their WhatsApp contact without having to disclose their phone number. This could be useful for people who want others to contact them on WhatsApp, but don’t want to share their information or their phone number. For businesses, it might be easier to share a name than a phone number to their customers.

WhatsApp username reservation rollout
Image Credits: Jagmeet Singh / TechCrunchImage Credits:Jagmeet Singh / TechCrunch

Here is how you can reserve your username:

  • Go to Settings > Account and tap on the Username option under the “Your Account” section
  • If you are setting up your username for the first time, you will get a “Create username” option, and then you can type in and choose your username.
  • If the username you chose is not available, WhatsApp will suggest some variations if you tap the “suggest a username” option.

WhatsApp is reserving certain usernames of public figures and entities, so you won’t be able to reserve them for yourself. If you already have a Facebook or an Instagram username, you can log in through either of the services and reserve your handle as a username too.

Once you set the username, you can go to the same menu and change it by tapping on the “Edit” button on the top right-hand corner. Alternatively, you can also delete your username.

WhatsApp also allows for an extra layer of protection with a username key. You can limit people who contact you from “Everyone” to “People who know my key” from the username menu. This means that people who know your username will also type in a four-digit key before contacting you for the first time. Users can save the key or generate a new key at any time.

Advertisement

The username feature will go live in the coming weeks. Until then, WhatsApp is only allowing people to claim their usernames to avoid duplication.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Is Big Tech Now Backpedaling on the AI Jobs Wipeout Scenario?

Published

on

“A year ago, the message from many business leaders was that AI was going to wipe out jobs,” remembers the Wall Street Journal.But “For the past month or so, tech CEOs have been striking a more optimistic tone.”


In late May, OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman — who has long predicted that AI will lead to seismic shifts in the workforce — said during a conference, “We’ve been roughly right on technological predictions and pretty wrong on the social and economic implications.” Soon after, he told CNBC, “Our industry underestimated how much we’re going to be able to keep people at the center of everything.”

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who warned in May 2025 that artificial intelligence could eliminate half of entry-level jobs, a year later highlighted more positive scenarios for AI-adopting businesses: “They can do the same thing with less resources, and that leads to things like layoffs, or they can do more with the same amount of resources. But that requires creativity….”

Is the sunnier outlook a move to win back customers and the public who are souring on AI’s world-upending promise? Or is the role of AI in the workplace now just better understood…?

Advertisement

Collectively, the narrative has shifted from worker-light doomsday scenarios caused by AI to a future in which workers keep their jobs — and get a productivity boost. The sentiment change isn’t limited to tech leaders: A survey by EY-Parthenon found that the percentage of CEOs who believe AI investments will result in significant reductions in head count fell from around 46% in January 2025 to just 20% this May.
“They may have noticed that the labor market is genuinely not changing (i.e., imploding) as rapidly as they expected,” said David Autor, a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “They may have realized it was simply bad business to say that your great new product will destroy the economy.”
The article notes Amazon founder Jeff Bezos “has a history of predicting that AI will create new jobs,” and in June said AI could even lead to a labor shortage. “When asked on CNBC in May about people being afraid of AI taking jobs, he said the reason they’re afraid is because ‘all these smart people keep saying that.’”

The article then adds that “Fewer people are saying it now.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How Ring doorbell cameras breed paranoia in neighborhoods

Published

on

In 2022, a father and son in Florida received notifications from their Ring doorbell camera: Someone was at their door. The pair quickly jumped into action, scouring their apartment complex for a would-be intruder. The scene they happened upon was a woman checking her phone in her car. They fired seven shots at her as she drove away.

The woman, who survived, had never approached their door. The person who was captured on camera turned out to be a neighbor dropping off a package that had been mistakenly delivered to his home.

This is an extreme example of paranoia-fueled behavior spurred by home security systems, but it’s part of a larger trend. Footage of alleged porch pirates is regularly posted to community Facebook and Nextdoor groups, and any odd-seeming or erratic action can raise suspicion, especially if you’re a person of color.

This class of doorbell cameras, which includes Amazon-owned Ring, Google Nest Doorbell, and SimpliSafe, is marketed as a convenient means of seeing who’s at your door, a tool to catch burglars and trespassers and maybe even find your lost dog. In actuality, its uses are often more nefarious. Hundreds of local law enforcement and government agencies nationwide have joined Ring’s social app Neighbors, a platform where anyone, regardless of whether they own a Ring camera, can post a tip about crime or safety in their neighborhood, and where investigators can request footage from Ring users. And doorbell cameras are popular; 62 percent of respondents in a 2025 US News survey said they installed an outdoor security camera at home. Americans have turned their yards and porches into their own tiny surveillance states.

Advertisement
an illustration of a person peeking over a fence

Laura Simonati for Vox

In addition to the obvious legal and privacy concerns, there is scant evidence that doorbell cameras actually reduce crime — but there is reason to believe they are having an impact on our neighborly relationships. Research has shown that knowing we’re being watched makes us subconsciously more aware of others, which, in turn, may make us paranoid. Another paper found “the awareness of being watched can intensify existing distrust, paranoia, and fear.” This suspicion colors how we perceive and interact with each other.

“Being a good neighbor does not mean spying on your neighbors,” Will Owen, the communications director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, told Vox. “We do need to change our thinking around neighborhood surveillance and not buy into the big tech that is creating fear and distrust among neighbors.”

How cameras undermine trust

Even as more people outfit their homes with surveillance technology, ironically, Americans hold their neighbors in high regard. A recent report from the Survey Center on American Life found that 72 percent of Americans maintain some level of trust in their neighbors, a stark contrast to the just 30 percent of Americans who said they trusted others more broadly, according to last year’s World Happiness Report. These findings suggest people feel like they belong in their communities, even if they don’t regularly interact with their neighbors, Daniel Cox, the director of the Survey Center on American Life and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told Vox.

Advertisement

So, if we generally believe the people who surround us can be trusted, then who exactly are the cameras for? “If you already trust your neighbors…you can infer that the camera is there to deter people from outside your neighborhood from stealing,” Peter Kim, a professor of management and organization at the USC Marshall School of Business and author of How Trust Works: The Science of How Relationships Are Built, Broken and Repaired, told Vox. But if you don’t have actual relationships with your neighbors, you may become suspicious of them, too. Suddenly, everyone is a potential suspect.

Americans tend to consider their homes as their own domain that they alone are responsible for protecting. Instead of relying on communal support (Can I give you a spare key in case I ever get locked out? Do you need me to water your plants while you’re out of town? You’d let me know if you saw someone stealing my package, right?) we lean into individualistic forms of protection like personal security cameras. What this signals to the wider community is that, absent a camera, people cannot be trusted to not steal each other’s packages. And, sure, the camera maybe deters a few people from petty theft, but at what cost? “It’s no longer about those [good] behaviors being the result of your neighbors being trustworthy. Instead the inference becomes, they’re doing this because of this monitoring system, this real disincentive that’s in place,” Kim said. “People can behave in a trustworthy manner, but ironically, you can have less trust in them because you believe that if it were not for that system, they wouldn’t behave in a trustworthy way.”

The cynicism actually leads to a cycle of bad behavior. When cameras are turned onto others, people readily admit to spying on their neighbors, watching back footage to overhear conversations, research found. (Two different participants in the study said they eavesdropped semi-regularly, even though they don’t typically talk to their neighbors in person.) What’s more, when we suspect others won’t abide by the standard neighborly social contract — don’t vandalize, don’t steal — we are less likely to abide by those unspoken rules, too, Kim said. “It becomes more of a, ‘I’m looking out for myself and to hell with all of you,’” Kim added.

How being surrounded by cameras makes us feel

Advertisement

In a 2022 study, participants were instructed to set up cameras and film themselves in various scenarios in their homes. Knowing they were being recorded, many participants reported feeling self-conscious, which impacted how they acted. They actually held back from showing affection to their partner, or from talking.

Other research has found that when people know they’re being watched, they’re able to detect human faces on a computer quicker than people who aren’t under surveillance. “It suggests that our brain might be in this hyper-alert state when we’re being surveilled to detect others in our environment and possibly threat in our environment,” Kiley Seymour, an associate professor of neuroscience and behavior at the University of Technology Sydney and the study’s lead author, told Vox. And participants weren’t even aware of how being on camera affected their response time. “They were like, ‘Oh no, we forgot the cameras were even there.’ … And, despite that, it’s really influencing how they respond to the stimuli that are put in front of them,” Seymour said.

In a neighborhood setting, constant surveillance could make us more sensitive to what our neighbors say, or we could perceive them as more threatening than they actually are, Seymour said. Being perpetually on the lookout for threats puts everyone on edge, ready for a fight.

an illustration of a woman sitting on a couch watching four views of surveillance footage

Laura Simonati for Vox

Home security cameras are often marketed as a form of community connection, but they are ultimately used as a means of isolation and community policing — and the negative consequences disproportionately impact minorities, according to Neilly Tan, a PhD researcher studying human centered design and engineering at the University of Washington. One study from MIT’s Media Lab analyzed public posts from users in Los Angeles on Ring’s social app Neighbors and found that “users actively frame video subjects as criminal and suspicious, that the race of a neighborhood has a significant impact on posting rates, and…that Neighbors may be used as a racial gatekeeping tool, particularly by white neighborhoods that border non-white areas in Los Angeles.”

Advertisement

“This idea of whiteness is apparent with using this technology,” Tan said, adding that one study participant talked about how filming someone with a security camera reminded them of the “Karen” archetype.

To be a good neighbor, spy less and talk more

Trusting our neighbors and resisting the urge to give in to paranoia or spy on them requires vulnerability, Kim said. Letting our guards down, perhaps by ditching the cameras, fosters goodwill when we realize we haven’t been taken advantage of.

To do so, we need to invest time in getting to know our neighbors. In his research, Cox has found that Americans consider a “good” neighbor someone who minds their own business and doesn’t get involved in your life. But the value in being part of a community is knowing each other. “It requires us to be more comfortable with our neighbors getting involved in our affairs and us getting involved in theirs,” Cox said.

Advertisement

The only way to do that is through genuine conversation. Start by simply saying hello when you cross paths in the hallway or while walking the dog, then transition to small talk. (Some possible conversation topics: the weather, events in your town, recommendations for a plumber.) “Neighborly small talk collectively really matters in instilling trust and understanding of your community,” Cox said. “We under-appreciate how important regular, routinized social interactions are either in the workplace or in our neighborhoods.”

With time, you’ll become an established part of each other’s days — a familiar face you see around the neighborhood, someone to ask a favor of, someone to do a favor for. Someone who isn’t a threat or someone to spy on, but another person living their lives in proximity to yours.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Station F ramps up as a launchpad for Europe’s hottest AI startups

Published

on

Station F, a Paris-based startup hub founded by French billionaire Xavier Niel, is gearing up for a new edition of its F/ai accelerator program in a bid to strengthen its positioning as a stepping stone for promising AI startups.

Launched in January of this year, F/ai’s planning to kick-start its second batch this September, aiming to help a handful of AI-focused startups move from early product to real revenue in a matter of weeks.

Spanning 538,000 square feet, Station F is often described as a co-working space, but its footprint extends beyond the physical space, its director Roxanne Varza told TechCrunch.

One example is Station F’s Future 40 annual selection, in which the team names the most promising teams among some 1,000 companies it welcomes each year. In 2024, TechCrunch observed that nearly all of that annual cohort incorporated AI into its core business.

Advertisement

Station F today has a front row seat to the rise of AI startups, leveraging its position as a cornerstone of “la French Tech.” The startup hub has also successfully leveraged its position to capture equity stakes in its Future 40 companies. “We have been investing [in these companies] since 2022,” Varza said.

Helped both by its size and Niel’s connections, Station F has become a frequent stop for officials seeking to connect with Europe’s tech scene, with no less than 11 presidential visits since President Macron’s inaugural tour in 2017. It has also welcomed AI big names like Sam Altman, and is now leveraging these ties for F/ai.

The first cohort of F/ai’s program was backed by a long list of significant tech companies — AMD, Anthropic, AWS, Clay, Google, G42, Hugging Face, Lovable, Meta, Microsoft, Mistral AI, OpenAI, OVHcloud, Snowflake, and Qualcomm — not to mention several VC funds.

The second cohort will add a few more big names, TechCrunch has learned: Eleven Labs, Nebius, Rippling, OpenRouter, HubSpot, and GitHub.

Advertisement

“The goal was to bring together all the major players and make it much easier for [AI] startups looking to launch in Europe to connect with them,” Varza said.

Two teams from the accelerator’s first batch have already gained international recognition: Alpic, which won the global grand finale of The Pitch, a competition organized by Deel; and Rippletide, which won the OpenAI Codex Hackathon.

While awards rarely hurt, especially when they bring funding, F/ai is focused on helping its cohort generate revenue, targeting €1 million (about $1.14 million) within six months. “We’d heard quite a bit of criticism about the slow pace of commercialization of European startups,” Varza said. “This brings them on par with what investors are seeing in the U.S.”

Investors seem to like what they’ve seen so far. The first cohort collectively raised $34 million in pre-seed funding, according to Station F. The teams’ track record may have also helped: 80% of these 20 AI startups were founded by repeat entrepreneurs, a third of whom hold PhDs.

Advertisement

The founder profile skews that way mostly because F/ai selects its cohort exclusively via recommendations from founders, partners, and investors — a process that could add to the cliquishness and elitism France’s tech scene is at times accused of.

But while teams can’t apply directly, they can get in touch with one of F/ai’s many partners, and perhaps soon with alumni, Varza said. She added that Station F has some 30 other programs startups can apply to.

Access appears to be a key focus for F/ai, which has in the past hosted the likes of Turing Award winner Yann LeCun for private chats. “Today, if the founders here want to speak to people at this level, they all seem to think they need to go to the U.S. and join a program there. We actually want to show that you can stay here and do it from here,” Varza said.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic expands in Seattle as AI boom offers hope for struggling office market

Published

on

Anthropic’s booth at AWS re:Invent in 2025. Its new Seattle lease puts it just up the street from Amazon. (GeekWire File Photo)

Anthropic is embarking on a major expansion in Seattle, underscoring how artificial intelligence companies are emerging as one of the few bright spots in the region’s office market.

The maker of the Claude AI model recently finalized a lease at Dexter Yard North in Seattle’s South Lake Union neighborhood, capping months of speculation about the company’s expansion plans in the region.

Terms of the deal were not publicly disclosed, but CoStar News reports that the company leased 113,000 square feet of space across multiple floors in the north tower at 700 Dexter Avenue North. CoStar called it one of the largest office deals of the year so far in Seattle.

The expansion would significantly increase Anthropic’s footprint in Seattle, where the San Francisco-based company established an engineering office in 2024 as it recruited talent from the region’s deep pool of AI researchers and software engineers.

It would also place Anthropic next door to Amazon. The companies in April expanded their existing partnership: Amazon committed to invest up to $25 billion in Anthropic, which simultaneously made a $100 billion-plus spending commitment to AWS over 10 years. 

Advertisement

The following month, Anthropic announced $65 billion in funding at a $965 billion valuation, thought to be the last venture round before an initial public offering later this year.

On Thursday, Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5, which the company says “can make plans, use tools like browsers and terminals, and run autonomously at a level that, just a few months ago, required larger and more expensive models.”

Also this week, The U.S. Department of Commerce removed export controls on the company’s Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, part of an ongoing back-and-forth with the Trump administration.

Anthropic’s Seattle lease provides hope that demand from AI companies could help revive parts of Seattle’s office market after several years of elevated vacancy driven by remote work and tech industry cutbacks. Seattle’s office vacancy rate inched up to 28% during the first quarter, the highest in the region.

Advertisement

Other AI firms, including OpenAI and Databricks, have also expanded their Seattle-area office footprints in recent months. In those instances, the companies chose to grow in nearby Bellevue.

Dexter Yard, a two-building office and life sciences campus developed by BioMed Realty, opened in 2022 and was designed to accommodate both technology and biotech tenants. The north tower contains approximately 163,000 square feet of office and lab space.

Anthropic has a number of open engineering roles spread across Seattle, New York and San Francisco. The company says it expects all staff to be in one of their offices at least 25% of the time.

A spokesperson for Anthropic acknowledged the new lease, but did not respond to requests for additional comment.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Google Ordered to Pay $2 Billion For Anti-Competitive Practices By Swedish Court

Published

on

Google was ordered to pay almost $2 billion this week to Pricerunner, reports Bloomberg:

The Patent and Market Court in Stockholm, which issued the judgment on Wednesday, dismissed most parts of the claim in which Pricerunner sought 80 billion Swedish kronor, or roughly $8.2 billion, in the wake of a European Union antitrust crackdown… The Swedish price-comparison website argued that Google has been abusing its dominant position as a search engine by favoring its own comparison shopping service over competing portals for more than a decade. Wednesday’s award compensates for lost revenue caused by Google’s preferential treatment of its own comparison-shopping service over independent price-comparison services, conduct that also drives up costs for consumers, [Pricerunner owner] Klarna said in a statement after the judgment…

A Google spokesperson said the company doesn’t agree with the court’s decision and will consider its legal options. [The ruling can be appealed.] Changes implemented in 2017 to Google’s platform are working and generating growth and jobs for hundreds of comparison shopping services operating more than 1500 websites across Europe, according to the statement.

The litigation is linked to a 2017 decision by the European Commission to fine Google €2.4 billion for illegally leveraging its search dominance to give its own shopping service an edge. The EU decision unleashed a wave of so-called follow-on suits, which were delayed for years as Google appealed the EU fine. Two years ago the EU’s top tribunal confirmed that the company did violate antitrust laws — meaning EU-based plaintiffs no longer have to prove that in court. A Berlin court last year ordered the tech giant to pay €573 million in damages to two German price-comparison websites, a ruling Google appealed. Similar cases are pending across Europe.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Alibaba is banning its workers from using Claude Code as US v China AI battle heats up

Published

on


  • Alibaba bans access to Claude Code, tells employees to use internal Qoder instead
  • Anthropic was tracking markers to indicate which users were in China
  • Anthropic accused Alibaba of major Claude model distillation effort

Alibaba has reportedly banned its employees from using Claude Code internally, beginning July 10 2026, classifying it as a high-risk tool that risks organizational security.

The change follows similar trends already observed among American tech giants, banning Chinese tools from internal use, but Alibaba cited genuine concerns that have been acknowledged by Claude-maker Anthropic.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Opinion: Governor’s new economic council snubs startups, forgets AI

Published

on

Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson. (Flickr Photo via Governor’s Office)

Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson last week announced an Economic Development Council to “identify practical actions that strengthen Washington’s economy, expand opportunity and help more Washingtonians succeed.”

To Ferguson’s credit, he may finally be recognizing that Washington’s business climate is deteriorating.

While he didn’t admit any responsibility for that decline, the number of companies and highly successful job creators that have said “Bye Bob” and taken jobs to other states — Starbucks and Janicki Industries to name two recent examples — cannot have escaped his attention.

Who’s who

The council’s composition gives us a glimpse into the governor’s economic mindset. Unfortunately, it isn’t forward-looking.

@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}

There are more nonprofits and governmental agencies than businesses. Except for one small homebuilder, none of the participating companies were founded this century. Calling the council a “historic convening” is unintentionally apt.

Advertisement

There is zero representation from entrepreneurs, the startup ecosystem or anyone building the industries of the future. The mayor of Cleveland remains better plugged into our startup community than any politician in Washington.

The largest participants on the governor’s new council are notable for mass layoffs and shifting their workforces out of the state.

Amazon and Microsoft have each cut tens of thousands of jobs, as they become more capital-intensive and lean into AI-driven productivity. Boeing now has nearly two-thirds of its employees outside Washington state, and that shift continues.

Oblivious to AI

Also missing from the governor’s framing is the single biggest force shaping the economy today: AI.

Advertisement

He namechecks quantum computing, advanced manufacturing, and clean energy, but omits AI.

New jobs overwhelmingly come from young growth companies, and AI is driving new company formation. 

Beyond startups, AI is going to dramatically reshape knowledge work and boost productivity in every single organization (including, hopefully, government). 

It is impossible to talk about “the next chapter of economic prosperity for our state” without discussing the implications of AI.

Advertisement

The committee agenda

“The council will meet quarterly and submit advisory reports to the governor with its findings and recommendations.” 

The first report, in its entirety, should say “STOP DRIVING BUSINESS AWAY.”

Starbucks, perhaps not surprisingly, was not invited to participate on the council, though Gov. Ferguson tells The Seattle Times he understands the coffee giant’s importance to the region and “has a direct line of communication with them.”

The governor suggests he “would be open to more aggressive financial incentives to attract out-of-state business,” but why not prioritize keeping companies that are already here? 

Advertisement

The zero-sum view of job creation — that you must pay to lure companies from other states — reflects a profound ignorance of the magic of economic growth.

Just nurture an environment conducive to growth. Effective and efficient delivery of public services, predictable taxes, and sensible regulation. But that would require changes in how state government operates today.

In other words, grow what you’ve got.

Learning from Cleveland

I have argued that the software era is ending, and we need to find our next economic act in Washington state. Prosperity is precarious and can’t be taken for granted. 

Advertisement

The governor was invited, through a representative, to join GeekWire’s recent visit to Cleveland but never responded. I still hope he can learn from Cleveland as part of his interest in economic development.

Cleveland’s experience after its industrial economy fractured painfully demonstrates the potential downside we face. More than a half century later, that city is still working extraordinarily hard to recover. 

The mayor of Cleveland observed that when the Rust Belt started to rust: “We didn’t pivot fast enough, and the world left us behind.”

Today, every level of government in Ohio is laser-focused on jobs, economic growth and prosperity. Our state should be just as focused, especially as our economic tectonic plates shift.

Advertisement

It is a very positive milestone that our governor is seeking “the next chapter of economic prosperity for our state.”

But committees don’t drive economic growth. It starts with “first do no harm.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Moody Bible Institute breach leaves 2.3M accounts needing salvation, says cyber expert

Published

on

Security

ShinyHunters leaks names, addresses, DOBs, and more after Christian college discloses cyberattack

Data on more than 2.3 million people associated with Moody Bible Institute (MBI) has been exposed online after the Christian college was targeted by ShinyHunters.

The attack was first disclosed by MBI in June, and the extortion crew later leaked the stolen data. Have I Been Pwned has since added the cache to its breach notification database, putting a figure on the number of exposed accounts.

Advertisement

MBI is one of many victims of ShinyHunters’ pay-or-leak attacks in 2026, and while the organization has not explicitly commented on whether it negotiated with the criminals, the leak suggests that the group’s extortion demands were not met.

Broadly consistent with ShinyHunters’ claims, the MBI data made available for download on June 23 includes names, genders, dates of birth, physical and email addresses, phone numbers, and marital statuses.

The cache also included documents concerning donor relations, MBI’s supporters, students, and alumni.

MBI has not spoken publicly since June 22, the day before ShinyHunters leaked its files. 

Advertisement

The organization stated that its tech team had addressed a vulnerability and brought in external cybersecurity experts to help with its incident response. 

It urged those affiliated with MBI to monitor their accounts and make use of free credit freezes and fraud alerts until it had completed its investigation.

“Throughout this process, we are grateful for the Lord’s faithfulness and for the dedicated teams and outside experts working tirelessly to protect our ministry and those we serve,” said MBI.

“We are confident that God remains sovereign over every circumstance, and we trust Him to grant wisdom and discernment as we navigate this situation together.”

Advertisement

MBI has various operations, or “ministries.” Chief among them is its university, which offers undergraduate, graduate, and online courses for those pursuing ministry work. It also offers aviation courses with a theology component.

More than 250,000 students have studied at MBI since it was first established in 1886.

It also runs Moody Radio, a Christian radio network/station, and a publishing arm devoted to Christian literature.

ShinyHunters’ leak site lists 86 victims since January, although the number for the year is likely higher, since those who paid extortion fees would be removed from the list of breached organizations.

Advertisement

The group has been linked to high-profile attacks involving Salesforce, Carnival, and Pitney Bowes.

The gang has also claimed that a Oracle PeopleSoft campaign affected more than 100 organizations, and cited a PeopleSoft breach in the details about its attack on MBI.

National security alerts were issued about ShinyHunters earlier in the year following its attack on learning platform Canvas, which compromised the data of an estimated 275 million students. ®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Tesla launches Robotaxi in Miami with no safety monitor

Published

on

Tesla’s driverless cabs have reached a fifth US city. This time, there is no human minder in the car at all.

The company rolled out its Robotaxi service in part of Miami on Friday, it announced on X. A map in the post showed a small patch of West Miami, well away from the busy downtown. That mirrors how Tesla started in Dallas and Houston earlier this year.

No safety monitor this time

One detail stands out. Tesla is running the Miami cars without a safety monitor, its VP of AI software Ashok Elluswamy said on X. The Information first flagged the change. It marks a jump in confidence. When Tesla launched in Austin in June 2025, it put a monitor in the passenger seat. The company dropped them there only later.

The rollout follows a familiar script. Tesla opens in a tight zone, then widens it. Austin grew from a small area to the whole metro last month. Miami will probably follow the same path.

Advertisement

A crowded road

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Tesla is not alone in the city. Waymo launched its driverless service in Miami in April. Amazon’s Zoox is testing there too. Miami is fast becoming a proving ground for robotaxis, much as Phoenix and Austin were before it.

Tesla still trails the market leader on scale. Waymo runs a far bigger fleet, and the gap is a matter of public record. But Tesla is moving fast, and its camera-only approach is cheaper to deploy than the sensor-laden systems its rivals favour.

Advertisement

What comes next

The company wants to go much further, fast. On its April earnings call, CEO Elon Musk said Tesla aims to offer the service in a dozen states by the end of the year. It has publicly floated cities in Florida, Arizona and Nevada as the next stops, including Orlando, Tampa and Phoenix.

That timeline is ambitious. Tesla has a habit of missing its self-driving deadlines, so the map may fill in slower than Musk suggests. There is also the safety question. Taking out the human monitor raises the stakes on every ride, and regulators are watching. Tesla has already settled a fatal Full Self-Driving crash case. For now, though, the driverless map keeps growing. Miami is the latest pin.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025