Connect with us

Tech

How to Choose the Right Automation Stack

Published

on

Digital transformation has become an imperative. Companies throughout the US economy are in an all-out race to automate their workplaces, for all sorts of reasons: Labor is getting more expensive while robots are getting better and cheaper; real wages have been flat for years so companies are hiring less and machines more; and workers across multiple industries want machines alongside them, as a way of making their jobs (and joints) less painful. But in the quest for building the optimal automation stack, leaders are often left with a single important question:

Should we invest in RPA, BPM, or iPaaS — or all three?

It is important to know these differences before choosing an appropriate solution. Today, we unpack RPA, BPM and iPaaS in plain language — with facts and trends — so you can call your own shots.

First, Let’s Understand the Core Technologies

1. What is RPA?

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) applies bots to complete routine, rule-based tasks which would involve human interaction with digital systems. Similar bots log into applications, key in information, transfer files and conduct transactions in much the same way employees do — but faster, and without errors.

Advertisement

The global market for RPA software has grown into the double digits year over year, and this remained true even as organisations continued to automate back-office operations, according to Gartner. Many firms are teaming up with RPA services to fast-track the implementation process with enterprise-grade control.

RPA works best when:

Tasks are repetitive and rule-driven

Data is structured

Advertisement

Systems lack APIs (legacy applications)

Quick ROI is required

“RPA is, however, task-level automation — not full process optimisation.

2. What is BPM?

Business Process Management (BPM) is from a design, monitoring and reconfiguration perspective the whole workflow. Rather than automating discrete tasks, BPM enhances the entire process life cycle.

Advertisement

For example:

Employee onboarding

Insurance claims processing

Loan approval workflows

Advertisement

BPM solutions offer visibility, governance, compliance and control tracking, as well as workflow orchestration. If RPA is the “worker,” then BPM is the “manager” overseeing the entire operation.

BPM practitioners see improved efficiency, shorter cycle times, and better compliance in the context of regulated industries.

3. What is iPaaS?

iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service) is a cloud-based integration model that links applications, data and devices with connectors and APIs. It guarantees instant data synchronisation between those solutions and other systems (CRM, ERP, HRMS, cloud applications).

If you are a company that’s working with multi-cloud or hybrid solutions, iPaaS is an absolute must.

Advertisement

Being a backend data layer integration tool, and not operating at the user interface level like RPA, iPaaS is far more stable and scalable for long-term integration needs.

Key Differences at a Glance

Technology

Focus

Best For

Advertisement

Scalability

RPA

Task automation

Repetitive manual tasks

Advertisement

Medium

BPM

Process orchestration

End-to-end workflow optimisation

Advertisement

High

iPaaS

System integration

Connecting cloud & enterprise apps

Advertisement

Very High

Why Businesses Are Moving Toward Hyperautomation

The future of automation isn’t a question of picking one tool. It’s about combining them strategically.

This combination is known as hyperautomation – combining RPA, BPM, iPaaS and AI with analytics in a cohesive system.

Advertisement

The hyperautomation market is anticipated to expand substantially until 2030, as businesses increasingly require intelligent and scalable automation solutions, industry estimates say.

A good hyperautomation company generally assists companies to model multi-layered architectures where:

BPM manages workflows

iPaaS handles system integration

Advertisement

RPA automates individual tasks

AI enhances decision-making

This is orchestration that provides measurable ROI and long-term scalability.

When Should You Choose RPA?

RPA is ideal when:

Advertisement

You want to make quick wins with minimal changes in infrastructure

You do similar finance or HR jobs repeatedly

For legacy systems, you will require the automation

You want to do cheaper operations fast

Advertisement

Many companies kick off their automation journey with RPA services to eliminate manual roadblocks in for example finance and operations.

But RPA just might not scale well enough on its own, without tying in and orchestrating workflow.

When Should You Choose BPM?

Choose BPM if:

You really want to see everything that’s happening in workflows

Advertisement

Compliance and auditable trails are very essential.

Processes involve multiple departments

Continuous optimisation is required

BPM solutions empower you to redesign and automate inefficient workflows. This protects against the common pitfall of “automating broken processes”. 

Advertisement

When Should You Choose iPaaS?

Choose iPaaS if:

You use multiple SaaS applications

Real-time data flow is essential

API-driven architecture is available

Advertisement

You want scalable cloud integration

iPaaS lets you rely less on UI-based bots and provides more durable backend integrations.

The role of Low-Code and Test Automation

Modern automation stacks are helped alongside low-code and no-code application development platforms. Therefore with these types of tools, business teams can genuinely create workflows and apps without deep coding skills, further fueling digital initiatives.

Plus, collaborating with such providers who deliver the top test automation services ensures that your automation scripts, along with integrations and workflows are consistent even as systems change over time. Testing is key because poorly controlled automation systems can be broken by UI changes, API updates or workflow adjustments.

Advertisement

How to Build Your Automation Stack (Step-By-Step Framework)

Here’s a basic expert framework to guide you in the decision:

Step 1: Identify Your Bottleneck

Are we actually faced with task repetition, that is lack of efficiency or division within the system?

Task problem → RPA

Advertisement

Workflow problem → BPM

Integration problem → iPaaS

Step 2: Assess Technical Environment

Legacy systems → RPA shines here

Advertisement

systems with an API → iPaaS is awesome

Complex cross-functional processes → BPM is necessary

Step 3: Plan for Scalability

Avoid building isolated automation silos. Integrate technologies in an organised automation infrastructure.

Advertisement

This is one of the reasons that companies frequently partner with providers who bring additional RPA Services to the table with an IR group that speaks BPM and integration frameworks design.

Real-World Example

Picture a health care provider sifting through thousands of insurance claims.

BPM designs the claims workflow

RPA pulls data from the old systems

Advertisement

iPaaS consolidates CRM, billing and compliance systems

Automated tests guarantee that workflows work without interruption

The result:

Faster processing time

Advertisement

Reduced manual errors

Improved regulatory compliance

Better patient experience

What are the Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Automating without process redesign

Advertisement

2. RPA only without integration

3. Ignoring governance and testing

4. Not planning for long-term scalability

An organisation with RPA Services ensures that these pitfalls are avoided.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts: What’s the Best Option?

RPA vs BPM vs iPaaS: No clear winner.

The correct answer will vary based on your business goal, technical ecosystem and long-term strategy.

If you can’t afford to wait for efficiency gains, open with RPA.

If you need additional governance and optimisation, do BPBM.

Advertisement

If you want to make data communications seamless, put some money into iPaaS.

If you want to transform at an enterprise level, that’s when you choose hyperautomation.

The most successful organisations view automation as a strategic capability, and not just another investment in technology.

Together with RPA, BPM, iPaaS, low-code platforms and powerful test frameworks in place this will allow your business to create a strong automation ecosystem which brings measurable ROI and power for sustainable growth. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

The death of ‘perfect’ photos? Why 2026’s major new cameras are wildly retro

Published

on

We’re six weeks into 2026 and there have been three major camera launches so far; the Leica Q3 Monochrom, Ricoh GR IV Monochrome and Fujifilm Instax Mini Evo Cinema.

That’s two pricey black-and-white-only compact cameras and a Super 8-style instant camera…that also shoots video.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

CBS Staffers Jump Ship Ahead Of More Layoffs From Another Pointless Media Merger

Published

on

from the inevitable-outcomes dept

U.S. media mergers always follow the same trajectory. Pre-merger, executives promise all manner of amazing synergies and deal benefits. Post-merger, not only do those benefits generally never arrive, the debt from the acquisition spree usually results in significant layoffs, lower quality product, and higher rates for consumers. The Time Warner Discovery disaster was the poster child for this phenomenon.

After paying Trump his $16 million bribe, CBS and Skydance (Trump’s friends in the Ellison family) recently finalized their $8 billion merger. It didn’t take long for the company to announce that the only way it could pay for the debt of the pointless deal is by firing a whole bunch of people in “painful” fashion.

Despite a lot of promises last summer by Paramount executives that the layoffs would come in one fell swoop, CBS News boss Bari Weiss has implemented staggered cuts as she converts what was left of CBS into yet another safe space for right wing autocrats and their dwindling cult.

Apparently “a lot of people” at CBS News are taking Weiss up on a January town hall promise of buyouts for those insufficiently deferential to Larry Ellison’s ambitions:

Advertisement

“They include at least six producers out of the show’s total of roughly 20, according to another source, who added: “Seems like people are jumping ship.”

“It’s a lot of people,” a CBS insider said.”

In her head, I really do think Weiss believes she’s reshaping CBS News into a better news organization. In reality, Weiss was specifically hired by billionaire Trump ally Larry Ellison to convert CBS into yet another autocrat-friendly safe space for the perpetually aggrieved.

Weiss’ problem to date has been that she’s not just bad at management, judgment, and journalism, she’s bad at ratings-grabbing agitprop — the real reason she was hired by billionaires in the first place.

Weiss’ inaugural “town hall” with opportunistic right wing grifter Erika Kirk was a ratings dud, her new nightly news broadcast has been an error-prone hot mess, and her murder of a 60 Minutes story about Trump concentration camps — and the network’s decision to air a story lying about the ICE murder of Nicole Good — spurred a revolt among the CBS journalists who hadn’t quit yet.

Advertisement

Weiss’ weird ego trip is playing out alongside the old traditional failures of mindless media consolidation, the last refuge of executives who are all out of original ideas, but desperately want to goose quarterly earnings, generate temporary tax cuts, and get “savvy dealmaker” stamped on their LinkedIn profile.

The thing is, merger related promises both before and after the deal are always meaningless. The layoffs are driven by debt from acquisitions, and the new CBS has been making plenty of those, including a new $7.7 billion deal to acquire the exclusive rights to MMA fights, a costly campaign to steal Warner Brothers, and that $150 million deal to acquire Bari Weiss’ lazy contrarian propaganda blog.

Larry Ellison clearly wants to hoover up what’s left of corporate media (including CBS, CNN, HBO) — and fuse it with his co-ownership of TikTok to create a sort of Hungary-esque autocratic state media. The only thing saving us from this outcome to date is the fact that absolutely nobody in this weird assortment of nepobabies and brunchlords appears to have absolutely any idea what they’re doing.

Filed Under: bari weiss, cbs news, consolidation, journalism, larry ellison, layoffs, media, mergers

Companies: cbs, paramount, skydance

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Your Friends Could Be Sharing Your Phone Number with ChatGPT

Published

on

“ChatGPT is getting more social,” reports PC Magazine, “with a new feature that allows you to sync your contacts to see if any of your friends are using the chatbot or any other OpenAI product…”


It’s “completely optional,” [OpenAI] says. However, even if you don’t opt in, anyone with your number who syncs their contacts are giving OpenAI your digits. “OpenAI may process your phone number if someone you know has your phone number saved in their device’s address book and chooses to upload their contacts,” the company says

But why would you follow someone on ChatGPT? It lines up with reports, dating back to April, that OpenAI is building a social network. We haven’t seen much since then, save for the Sora generative video app, which exists outside of ChatGPT and is more of a novelty. Contact sharing might be the first step toward a much bigger evolution for the world’s most popular chatbot.
ChatGPT also supports group chats that let up to 20 people discuss and research something using the chatbot. Contact syncing could make it easier to invite people to these chats…

[OpenAI] claims it will not store the full data that might appear in your contact list, such as names or email addresses — just phone numbers. However, the company does store the phone numbers in its servers in a coded (or hashed) format. You can also revoke access in your device’s settings.
09

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Luxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier

Published

on

Very few consumer A/V brands reach a century in operation. Luxman has already passed that mark, and the D-100 SACD/CD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier are not presented as anniversary products, but as current production models that define the company’s direction going forward.

With these components, Luxman is positioning itself clearly within the high-end segment. Rather than competing on volume or feature density like Denon or Yamaha, Luxman continues to operate in a smaller category alongside manufacturers such as McIntosh, Pass Labs, and Mark Levinson. The emphasis is on long term ownership, conservative engineering, and product lifespans measured in years rather than release cycles.

Integrated amplifiers have been part of Luxman’s core lineup since the 1960s, and the L-100 CENTENNIAL Integrated Amplifier makes that continuity explicit. The recent wave of new products is not driven by short update cycles or marketing pressure, but by development timelines extended during the pandemic.

Luxman has always felt aspirational in the best possible way. The gear is built to an exceptionally high standard, it sounds better than 98 percent of what is out there, and it manages to do so without requiring the sale of a child or a second mortgage. This is not part of the new wave of affordable high end audio and no one is pretending otherwise. The D-100 and L-100 are eye watering in terms of price, but they would land on any serious endgame short list without hesitation. Luxman lasts. It has soul. And yes, it still has VU meters that look unapologetically sexy because great engineering should never be afraid to look the part.

Advertisement

L-100 Integrated Amplifier Defines Luxman’s Vision for Its Second Century

luxman-l-100-centennial-front
Luxman L-100 Centennial

The Luxman L-100 Integrated Amplifier sits at the center of the company’s 100 Centennial Series and makes its priorities clear immediately. Rated at 20 watts per channel into 8 ohms and 40 watts into 4 ohms, the numbers are modest on paper and entirely deliberate in execution. This is a pure Class A integrated amplifier, not Class A/B and certainly not Class D. Every watt is delivered in continuous Class A operation, with the output devices conducting at all times. That choice favors linearity and tonal density over headline power, and it comes with the usual side effect. Yes, the amplifier runs warm. That is the cost of admission. JCP&L will be thrilled. Your accountant? Not so much.

The output stage uses a triple parallel bipolar push pull configuration supported by a substantial power supply built around a custom EI core transformer and eight large filter capacitors totaling 80,000 microfarads. This foundation provides the current stability required for Class A operation and helps explain the L-100’s damping factor of 300, which is unusually high for a low power Class A design. Luxman has focused on maintaining control and composure rather than chasing wattage for its own sake.

luxman-l-100-centennial-internal

At the circuit level, the L-100 employs version 1.1 of Luxman’s LIFES architecture, an evolution of the company’s long running Only Distortion Negative Feedback concept first introduced in 1999. Instead of applying global feedback indiscriminately, LIFES concentrates on detecting and correcting distortion components only.

By using multiple field effect transistors in parallel at the input of the error detection circuit, Luxman aims to reduce distortion and improve linearity while preserving the tonal weight and harmonic structure the brand is known for. The result is extremely low measured distortion without the flattened dynamics often associated with heavy feedback designs.

Volume control is handled by the LECUA1000 attenuator, an 88 step electronically controlled system integrated directly into the amplifier circuitry. Shortened signal paths and discrete buffer stages derived from Luxman’s flagship preamplifiers are used to minimize degradation and maintain drive capability.

luxman-l-100-centennial-rear

Connectivity is comprehensive and practical, with balanced and unbalanced line inputs, a high quality MM/MC phono stage, pre out and main in connections, dual speaker terminals for bi-wiring, and both 6.3 mm and 4.4 mm headphone outputs. The balanced headphone output uses independent grounds for left and right channels to improve separation and imaging.

Measured performance is consistent with Luxman’s design goals. Total harmonic distortion is specified at 0.005 percent or less at 1 kHz into 8 ohms, rising modestly to 0.015 percent across the full audio band. Frequency response extends from 20 Hz to 100 kHz on line inputs, while signal to noise ratios reach 98 dB for line level sources. Power consumption is substantial at 260 watts under operation, which again comes with the territory when running true Class A.

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Physically, the L-100 weighs 25.4kg (56 lbs) and looks exactly like what it is. A serious integrated amplifier built to last. The illuminated VU meters, brushed aluminum front panel, and restrained proportions are unmistakably Luxman, but the execution is modern rather than nostalgic. Meter illumination and the central LED volume display can be switched off if desired, though few owners are likely to do so.

The L-100 is not chasing trends, efficiency charts, or lifestyle friendly form factors. It is a deliberately uncompromising Class A integrated amplifier that prioritizes operating purity, long term ownership, and musical density over convenience. It will get warm. It will not be cheap. And it sounds like Luxman doing exactly what Luxman has always done best. If that does not move the needle for you, this was never your amplifier anyway.

D-100 SACD CD Player Reminds the Streaming Crowd Why Discs Still Matter

luxman-d-100-centennial-front

The Luxman D-100 SACD/CD Player serves as the digital counterpoint to the L-100 integrated amplifier and replaces the long-running D-10X. This is not a light refresh or a cosmetic update. Luxman has rebuilt its disc playback platform from the ground up, making it clear that optical media remains a core part of its second century rather than a legacy side project.

At the heart of the redesign is Luxman’s proprietary LxDTM-i disc transport, short for Disc Transport Mechanism improved. The mechanism is fully integrated into the main chassis and reinforced with thick aluminum side frames, a steel top plate, and an aluminum base to improve rigidity and suppress vibration. Mechanical stability remains a defining Luxman priority and the D-100 doubles down on that philosophy with cast-iron isolation feet.

Advertisement

Digital conversion is handled by ROHM BD34302EKV DACs in a true dual-mono configuration. File playback support is extensive, with PCM up to 768 kHz at 32-bit and DSD up to 22.5 MHz via USB, alongside native SACD and CD playback. Luxman has also focused heavily on clocking and noise management, employing a large quartz oscillator and ultra-low phase-noise circuitry to stabilize timing across both disc and file-based playback paths. Assuming it follows the same functional model as the D-10X, the D-100 can also operate as an external DAC for a high-end streamer.

The analog output stage mirrors the amplifier’s approach, using the latest LIFES 1.1 circuit in a fully balanced configuration feeding both RCA and XLR outputs. A large monochrome OLED display replaces the fluorescent panel used on earlier Luxman players, modernizing usability without turning the front panel into a glowing tablet. Luxman has not yet confirmed whether coaxial or optical digital outputs will be included as they were on the outgoing model, and the company has remained quiet on several secondary specifications.

Physically, the D-100 is very similar in size and mass to the D-10X, but weighs 3kg (6.6 lbs) more at nearly 50 lbs. The D-100 measures 440mm (17.3″) wide by 154mm (6.1″) high by 420mm (16.5″) deep.

luxman-d-100-centennial-rear

The D-100 exists because Luxman believes physical media still deserves reference-level hardware. It is unapologetically heavy, mechanically serious, and engineered for listeners who still care about discs and are willing to pay for the privilege. Streaming may be convenient. Luxman is clearly arguing that convenience is not the same thing as satisfaction.

Advertisement

The Bottom Line

Luxman’s D-100 and L-100 are not casual upgrades, they are statement pieces built for listeners who still care about engineering, longevity, and physical media. The L-100 is a pure Class A integrated that prioritizes operating purity over bragging rights, pairing Luxman’s LIFES 1.1 feedback architecture with the LECUA1000 88 step attenuator, a serious power supply, and full featured connectivity including balanced inputs and MM MC phono.

The D-100 is its matching digital counterweight, a ground up disc platform with the LxDTM-i transport, dual mono ROHM conversion, fully balanced analog output using LIFES 1.1, and the kind of mechanical overbuild that makes most modern disc players feel like toys.

Who is this for. The buyer who wants an endgame two box front end, values build quality and service life, and still spins discs while using a streamer as a transport when it suits the mood. Not for bargain hunters, not for minimalists, and definitely not for anyone who thinks a phone and a soundbar counts as a system.

luxman-l-100-centennial-badge

Price & Availability

The products will begin shipping in North America in late May or June 2026, with their first public showing expected at AXPONA in April.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

North American retail pricing is set at $11,995 for the L-100 and $18,995 for the D-100. Nothing about this pairing suggests affordable. It suggests buy it once, keep it for 20 years, and stop shopping.

For more information: luxman.com

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung readies LPCAMM2 LPDDR5X modules with up to 96GB and 9600 MT/s

Published

on


The LPCAMM2 design is part of an ongoing effort to replace soldered LPDDR in mobile and ultra-thin systems with memory that is both upgradeable and space-efficient. It builds on first-generation LPCAMM2 modules, which typically shipped with LPDDR5 memory. The new LPDDR5X variant continues that evolution, delivering higher efficiency and faster…
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung’s making a big mistake if it skips this feature in the Galaxy S26 range

Published

on

I’m not asking Samsung to reinvent the smartphone every year. If we’re being honest, it feels like the era of genuinely “new” phones is behind us – aside from occasional outliers like the Clicks Communicator and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold – and that’s fine.

What I do want, however, is for Samsung to stop treating genuinely useful, quality-of-life upgrades like optional extras. 

And if the latest Galaxy S26 chatter is on the money, Samsung is about to make a very avoidable mistake by launching yet another flagship lineup without built-in magnets for proper Qi2 wireless charging.

Yes, faster wireless charging is nice, but magnetic wireless charging is the bit that actually changes how you use your phone day-to-day. It’s something I’ve experienced not only on the iPhone side of things but also with this year’s Google Pixel 10 range, and it made using the phones so much easier. 

Advertisement

Leaks suggest a very familiar smartphone collection

The big S26 leak doing the rounds reads like the most Samsung thing imaginable: a spreadsheet of small, sensible upgrades that won’t exactly cause much excitement. 

Advertisement

If it’s accurate, we’re looking at the expected Galaxy S26, S26 Plus and S26 Ultra trio, with no S25 Edge successor in sight. The chipset split is said to return, with UK and EU users getting the Exynos 2600 while US users get the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, paired with 12GB of RAM across the board.

Samsung Galaxy S25Samsung Galaxy S25
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The regular Galaxy S26 is getting a slightly larger 6.3-inch screen, while the 6.7-inch S26 Plus and 6.9-inch S26 Ultra remain unchanged. That slightly larger screen means the S26 can pack a slightly larger 4300mAh cell, but the S26 Plus and Ultra’s cells remain the same as those of the S25 equivalents. 

There are a few minor camera improvements, but expect the same trio of 50MP main, 10MP telephoto and 12MP ultrawide sensors on the S26 and S26 Plus. The Ultra is said to get an improved f/1.4 aperture on its main lens, along with tweaked zoom and ultrawide lenses, but the resolutions similarly stay the same across the board.

Advertisement

Now, don’t get me wrong; none of that is explicitly bad. It’s just very familiar, for what feels like the millionth year in a row. And when a range feels this iterative, the smaller usability wins matter even more – which brings us nicely to charging.

Full Qi2 was rumoured, but it’s not looking good

For a while, it sounded like the Galaxy S26 range might finally go all-in on the “proper” version of Qi2 – you know, the one that works like you’d expect, with magnets inside the phone so accessories snap nicely into place.

Advertisement

We’ve seen it from multiple generations of iPhone and Google’s Pixel 10 series, including the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, so it should be relatively easy for Samsung to do the same, right?

Advertisement
Galaxy S25 Ultra - top down - backGalaxy S25 Ultra - top down - back
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Unfortunately, the latest chatter around certification suggests otherwise. The Galaxy S26 models are indeed tipped to support the Qi 2.2.1 standard, which is a genuine step forward, but the listings make no mention of the Magnetic Power Profile marker you’d see if magnets are actually inside the phone.

And, without that, you end up right back where we are now; if you want a neat snap-on experience with chargers, mounts and accessories, you’ll need to stick the phone in a magnetic case first.

That’s not exactly the end of the world, but it is annoying. And it’s exactly the sort of annoyance that shouldn’t exist on a phone you’re paying proper flagship money for – especially when the competition on both sides of the iPhone/Android divide are beginning to offer it on similarly-priced handsets. 

Advertisement

Magnets make accessories much easier to use

The best thing about magnets in a phone is the sheer lack of drama it brings. 

Advertisement

Wireless charging without magnets is the kind of ‘convenience’ that somehow still needs managing. You put the phone down, you shuffle it a bit, you glance for the charging icon and you hope that your cat doesn’t nudge it off-centre when you don’t notice. With magnetic alignment, however, you drop it on and it lands where it should. Every. Single. Time. 

Then there’s everything else to consider. Car mounts become something you can use one-handed without wrestling with a fiddly spring-loaded clamp, battery packs stop sliding around like a bar of soap in your pocket and wallet add-ons ensure you’ve always got your phone and cash in one place. 

UGreen MagFlow connected to a Pixel 10UGreen MagFlow connected to a Pixel 10
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It’s also great for content creators, with magnetic tripod mounts that make setting up shots a doddle, and you can even get dedicated camera grips to turn your phone into something more like a classic digital camera. 

Essentially, it turns accessories into things you actually want to use, rather than things you tolerate because you’ve already bought them. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Yes, a case can give you most of that – but “most of that” is doing a lot of work there. A case adds cost and bulk and forces you to shop around for the right one, which means Samsung still hasn’t really delivered on the feature. 

Still getting faster Qi2 charging, but it’s not enough

Let me be clear; faster wireless charging would still be a welcome change to the Galaxy S26 collection.

If the S26 range does indeed land with Qi 2.2.1 support and boosted wireless charging rates – leaks suggest 15W on the S26 and S26 Plus, with 25W on the Ultra – that’s a change you’ll likely notice, especially if you’re coming from an older model of Galaxy S.

However, I’d argue that speed isn’t the frustration that Qi2 is meant to fix; it’s alignment.

Advertisement
Galaxy S25 Plus and S25 standingGalaxy S25 Plus and S25 standing
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

If Samsung improves the numbers but still makes you buy a magnetic case to get the ‘it just works’ experience, it’ll feel like a feature implemented with one hand tied behind its back. 

Advertisement

The worst part is that it’ll be easy for Samsung to market it as Qi2 charging, while a lot of people will discover the catch after they’ve bought a charger or mount and wonder why their £1000/$1000 phone doesn’t behave quite like they expected. 

If the Galaxy S26 range really is shaping up to be yet another year of sensible, incremental upgrades, then Samsung needs at least one change that feels properly modern in daily use. 

Built-in magnets are that change. Not flashy, not headline-grabbing, but the kind of smart, practical improvement that you’ll genuinely appreciate in day-to-day use. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘Clueless’ -inspired app Alta partners with brand Public School to start integrating styling tools into websites

Published

on

Much has changed for Jenny Wang, the founder who’s bringing “Clueless” fashion tech to life. 

Last year, her company, Alta, raised $11 million in a round led by Menlo Ventures to let users create digital closets and try on their clothes with their own virtual avatars. It’s a tech once seen only in movies, most notably in “Clueless,” where Cher styles and plans her outfits using computer technology. Alta is similar to that, allowing users to plan and style outfits using the latest AI innovations.

A slew of big names participated in Atla’s round last year, including models Jasmine Tookes and Karlie Kloss, Anthropic’s VC arm Anthology Fund, and Rent the Runway cofounder Jenny Fleiss. 

TechCrunch caught up with Wang during New York Fashion Week to talk about how the company has expanded since that round.

Advertisement

For starters, the product is officially in the app store; Time and Vogue named it one of the best innovations of last year, and Wang said more than 100 million outfits have been generated on the platform since its launch in 2023.  It has partnerships with Poshmark and the Council of Fashion Designers of America, with more partnerships to be announced soon.

“Alta’s own app also features thousands of brands that users can shop from,” Wang said. 

Right now, the company is focused on building app and website integration experiences for brands, she said, where customers can try on a designer’s clothing using a personalized Alta Avatar. This week, the company unveiled its first integration collaboration, teaming up with Public School, a storied New York City brand. 

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

Boston, MA
|
June 23, 2026

“Shoppers can style looks from the new collection on their own Alta avatar,” Wang said. 

Advertisement

She met the Public School team — Dao-Yi Chow and Maxwell Osborne — through the founder of Poshmak, who is also an angel investor in both companies. 

“Public School designers Dao-Yi Chow and Maxwell Osborne had been looking for an AI partner and virtual try-on avatar solution, and Dao-Yi has been an Alta app user himself,” Wang said. 

Public School actually went on hiatus for a few years, with this NYFW marking its grand re-debut. When asked, the founders of the brand said they rediscovered their voices and what they wanted to say.

“We have to look at tech as a partner in the business today,” Chow told TechCrunch, adding, “It’s not 2015 anymore,” so the team wants to take advantage of the latest technological developments. “We want to be thoughtful on how we use tech and AI,” he continued, “not as a design tool but as a tool to extend our storytelling and a tool to interact with the consumer and have them experience the brand even if they can’t do so in person.”

Advertisement
Image Credits:Alta

Wang said this is one of the first instances of a designer embedding personal avatar and styling technology into its own website. Near the bottom of Public School’s product page, there is an icon that says Style by Alta. Clicking that takes the customer to Alta for them to then style their avatars and test out how Public School clothing would look on them, should they purchase. 

Users on Alta’s standalone app can also access Public School through Alta’s app. Wang said the goal is for Alta to integrate more experiences like this into other brands and websites, so Alta users can try on clothes on other websites even while outside the Alta app. 

“Right now, a user would have to add a potential purchase into their Alta wishlist, then style outfits and try on their avatar, versus being able to do that directly on the brand website.” (For every site but Public School, that is.) “The goal is to bring their community on a new journey to engage with and shop the brand.” 

Many major fashion brands, like Zara and Balmain, have already experimented with digital avatars. Wang said what makes Alta different here, especially compared to Zara, is that Alta avatars can put on at least 8 items within seconds, whereas Zara avatars can wear only four and often take around two minutes. 

Overall, demand for virtual avatars has increased. Wang considers Alta both still the “Cluless”  technology that it started out with, and a digital avatar business. 

Advertisement

“The consumer Alta app is the ‘Clueless’ closet, while the enterprise Alta experience allows shoppers to style pieces and try the outfits on their pre-existing Alta avatar,” he said. Eventually, Wang said she wants Alta to be the “personal identity layer for the future of consumer AI and shopping.”

For agentic commerce to truly work, she said, “We need a data layer that understands the shopper’s style preferences, such as their closet, past purchases, and their avatar, likeness, and body, which is Alta.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

That SSSS On Your Boarding Pass Could Mean TSA Will Swab Your Electronics

Published

on





No one wants to be stuck in the airport, as long lines, delayed flights, and frustrated passengers can make even the shortest trip feel much longer. Despite security tech projects that could change airport screening, the process can be even more of a hassle if you have SSSS on your boarding pass. This code means that you could be subject to enhanced screening that may involve the swabbing of your personal belongings, including electronics.

SSSS stands for Secondary Security Screening Selection, and it’s a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) designation. It’s used to identify passengers who need additional screening by the TSA. Passengers labeled SSSS typically don’t know the reason why, and neither do the TSA agents in charge of the screening. Often, it’s due to random selection, though the TSA can choose passengers for additional screening at its discretion. The DHS could also be selecting passengers using the Secure Flight program, which identifies suspected terrorists or other suspicious individuals.

Neither the DHS nor the TSA has publicly confirmed that the SSSS designation and the accompanying electronics swab are linked to Explosive Trace Detection (ETD). However, ETD screening is being carried out in some airports. It involves swabbing a passenger’s hands or belongings at the TSA checkpoint. The swab is then analyzed by a special device that can detect even the tiniest amounts of trace residue.

Advertisement

Enhanced airport screening and how to avoid delays

Air travelers can be repeatedly selected for enhanced screening by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) because their identification is similar to someone on a government watchlist. Because of this, the DHS developed the TRIP program, which generates a Redress Control Number (RCN) for affected travelers, which can be used when booking future flight reservations to avoid misidentification. However, having an RCN doesn’t mean that a passenger won’t get pulled for enhanced screening for other reasons.

In fact, anyone going through the airport can be subjected to further screening, as the TSA can pull you from the line when you’re going through a checkpoint. Even wearing baggy clothes could get you patted down, and your bags may be checked. The TSA doesn’t publicly disclose all its reasons for performing further screening, but it’s clear from what it has published online that it reserves the right to conduct such screenings whenever it feels necessary.

Advertisement

While it might be impossible to completely avoid such delays at the airport, TSA is expanding the precheck system to make the process smoother. You can also take some steps yourself that might help. First, empty your pockets and remove any big jewelry. Place your laptop in a bin before it goes through the scanner, make sure your devices are charged and ready to power on, and as you’re leaving the checkpoint, be sure to collect all of your items so you don’t have to backtrack later.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘I’m tired of that narrative’: Seattle VC pushes back on tech exodus talk

Published

on

The AI House in Seattle held a launch party when the startup hub opened last year along the waterfront. (GeekWire File Photo / Taylor Soper)

Enough with the hot takes about Seattle’s tech downfall.

That’s the message from Jacob Colker, managing director at the AI2 Incubator, who published a LinkedIn post Thursday pushing back on what he described as a “breathless narrative” that Seattle is one tax bill away from decline.

Colker didn’t cite specific posts or headlines. But debate has intensified in recent months as Washington lawmakers consider tax proposals that some business leaders warn could hurt the region’s innovation economy, including a bill targeting startup exits and the so-called “millionaire’s tax.”

“The math doesn’t math,” he wrote, arguing that a few points of capital gains tax don’t outweigh the region’s deep bench of AI talent, investment dollars, space leadership, fusion startups, biotech momentum, and quality of life.

He added: “Should we be thoughtful about tax policy? Heck yeah. Should it be tied to better stewardship of spending? Darn right. But the breathless narrative that Seattle is one bill from collapse is not serious analysis.”

Advertisement

His post sparked plenty of reaction.

  • “been reading the same slop since I moved here 20 years ago… The ecosystem keeps getting better and I’m not leaving either.” — Brian Glaister, exec at Axon
  • “When I moved to Seattle in 2007, a large part of that decision was bc the state constitution guaranteed no income tax. I moved here from CA. This change in policy is also why I will leave. Taking 20% of my stock is real and it’s a reason to leave.” — Aaron Bird, CEO at Inflection.io
  • “When I moved to Seattle 20+ years ago this same theme was banging around. Since then, hard to count how many multi-billion $ companies have been built and the pre-seed/early stage investment capital scene is SO much better. Bullish on Seattle.” — Robert Pease, managing partner at Cascade Seed Fund
  • “love this. two things can be true at the same time!” — Kirby Winfield, founder at Ascend

The debate over the state of Seattle’s startup scene comes as some founders relocate to San Francisco amid the AI boom.

Colker helps run AI2 Incubator, one of Seattle’s most prominent early stage startup investors. The firm launched an $80 million fund in October and operates AI House, the startup hub that opened last year along Seattle’s waterfront and serves as AI2 Incubator’s headquarters along with event space and co-working offices.

“Seattle isn’t perfect,” Colker wrote in his post. “No city is. But the sky isn’t falling. And I’m proud to triple down on this region — taxes or not.”

Related reading:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for Feb. 15 #510

Published

on

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.


Today’s Connections: Sports Edition pays homage to the Winter Olympics. The purple category is tough, as always — and today it expects you to hunt out hidden words inside longer words. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it free online.

Advertisement

Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: Lillehammer is another one.

Advertisement

Green group hint: Great White North.

Blue group hint: Think Chloe Kim.

Purple group hint: Look for a hidden word.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: Previous Winter Olympic hosts.

Advertisement

Green group: Canada men’s hockey players.

Blue group: Snowboarding terms.

Purple group: Ends in a piece of winter sports equipment.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

Advertisement

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for Feb. 15, 2026

The completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for Feb. 15, 2026.

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is previous Winter Olympic hosts. The four answers are Albertville, Chamonix, Oslo and St. Moritz.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is Canada men’s hockey players. The four answers are Celebrini, Crosby, Marner and McDavid.

Advertisement

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is snowboarding terms. The four answers are cork, frontside, goofy and McTwist.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is ends in a piece of winter sports equipment. The four answers are cheapskate, chopstick, Lipinski and milestone.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025