Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Spoiler: It’s more Siri stuff.
Apple is trucking ahead in preparation for the launch of iOS 27 this fall. Today, the company seeded the second beta of its upcoming operating systems to developers. The latest version expands on some of the features discussed during WWDC 2026, most notably those centered on the new and (hopefully) improved Siri. The same new features appear to be present across the beta 2 versions of iOS 27, iPadOS 27 and macOS 27 that dropped today, echoing the more holistic approach toward new features Apple took during that keynote presentation.
Testers will likely uncover additional details as they spend more time with the latest beta, but 9to5Mac posted a rundown of the major updates. Write with Siri has rolled out as a replacement for the old AI-powered Writing Tools prompt on both iPhone and iPads running the latest OS. A large prompt with the words “Write with Siri” will appear above the keyboard before you start typing anything, and it will shrink to just the Siri icon if you begin writing without the chatbot’s help. The other Siri features in this beta appear to be incremental changes, like faster performance and labeling elements of the Expressive Voice preview as “coming soon.”
9to5Mac also pointed to some welcome updates for RCS communications within the Messages app. We’ve been seeing more and more synergy and security between Apple and non-Apple device texts in recent months, and the new beta continues that trend. The latest version of iOS 27 introduces support for message reactions and in-line replies for RCS.
Other changes include improved iPhone Mirroring in macOS Golden Gate that resolved some issues from beta 1, as well as an update that allows AirPods Max 2 to update firmware. We’ll be keeping an eye out for any other intriguing changes as the operating systems’ official launch window draws nearer.
The Sonos Arc and newer Arc Ultra have long been among the standalone soundbars to beat for those seeking convincing Dolby Atmos sound in a minimalist design. Protracted app issues aside, Sonos’ chic sonic tube combines versatile multi-room expandability with a potent mix of expansive spatial audio effects, musicality, and authoritative bass, even without a sidecar subwoofer. While there have been plenty of challengers over the years, few have matched their performance for the money.
This year brings some impressive new contenders jockying for your console, including Samsung’s all-new HW-QS90H. This bar may have an uninspired name, and the design isn’t as striking as the Arc Ultra’s Scandi minimalism or Bose’s flashy new Lifestyle Ultra bar, but Samsung came to play. Within the QS90H’s brick-like frame is a well-balanced collection of drivers for solid immersion with 3D audio formats and enough bass to carve out serious cinematic drama from your favorite content.
The QS90H is no “Sonos killer,” and it doesn’t try to compete with the brand’s multi-room flexibility, but it offers plenty of forward-thinking features, especially for those with a newer Samsung TV. Most importantly, after dominating the multi-component soundbar space with the fantastic Q990 series for several generations, Samsung finally has its own standalone Atmos bar with competitive performance in a superbly simplified package.

The QS90H’s uniform industrial aesthetic feels blatantly basic when you first pull it from the foam, but a closer look reveals a few stylish deviations from Samsung’s other soundbars. Most notable are the thin chocolate ribbons of woodgrain plastic along the top, which add some personality to the otherwise faceless front grille.
A small collection of LEDs at the bar’s right face indicates settings and source changes, including a satisfying Knight Rider-esque volume beam, but like a lot of new models, the system is minimalist at best. The bar’s lengthy 49-inch frame makes it best suited for larger TVs like the 65-inch S90H OLED I used for my review, while its 2.7-inch height should slip beneath most modern screens. I do wish Samsung would follow Sony’s lead and add adjustable feet, which can help the bar’s 5-inch depth rise above a butting pedestal stand.
As I’ve come to expect from modern soundbars, there’s little variety for wired connection, with exactly zero analog inputs for legacy devices like a turntable, but unlike the pricier Arc Ultra and Bose Lifestyle Ultra, the QS90H does have a spare HDMI input for a Blu-ray player or game console. Oddly for 2026, it doesn’t support HDMI 2.1, meaning no passthrough for gaming features like VRR or 4K @ 120 Hz, but at least it’s an extra connection. A separate HDMI eARC port provides TV connection for seamless control of volume and power with most TV remotes, alongside an optical input for older devices (not compatible with 3D audio).
Those with select newer Samsung TVs like the S90H OLED can connect the bar wirelessly over Wi-Fi, no HDMI required. Other wireless connection options include Bluetooth and Wi-Fi streaming via Google Cast, Apple AirPlay, Spotify Connect, and TIDAL Connect. The bar is also Roon Ready for multi-room connectivity with other Roon hardware.
Unlike Sonos and Bose, Samsung doesn’t skimp on DTS, providing expansive support including DTS:X and full-range DTS-HD Master Audio and DTS-HD High Res Audio, along with lossless Dolby Atmos and Dolby Atmos Music. Unsurprisingly, it’s also compatible with Samsung and Google’s new Eclipsa Audio format.
Another Sonos omission the QS90H offers? A dedicated remote, which looks a lot like Samsung’s latest TV remotes, but with battery power instead of solar/USB-C. It’s mostly redundant between your TV remote and Samsung’s controller app, but it’s nice to have a backup.

The bar’s 7.1.2-inch configuration comprises 13 drivers, including nine “full-range” drivers across the left, right, and center channels, dual side-firing channels, and dual upfiring drivers to provide the height element for 3D audio. The final four drivers make up the bar’s Quad Bass Woofer system, which faces two drivers upward and two downward, designed for balanced and powerful bass down to a claimed 38Hz. It can’t replace a full subwoofer, and the bar steps lightly into that register at best, but it’s enough to anchor the rest of the sound for serious punch.
Like previous Samsung models, the QS90H can be turned on its front for wall-mounting, using an internal gyroscope to reroute the primary sound to the top speakers. I wasn’t able to test this feature at home, but it’s a cool option, though I’d be surprised if you don’t lose at least a little fidelity.
Samsung supplements its physical hardware with plenty of digital trickery, starting with its “AI Adaptive Sound” mode, designed to automatically pick the proper sound format based on your source. While the “AI” part is new(ish), Adaptive Sound has long provided an effective set-it-and-forget-it setting for most content. That pairs with Samsung’s Space Fit Pro sound analyzer, designed to adapt the sound to your room for limited but noticeable tightening of detail, though it also tends to sharpen the sound signature.
Other digital settings include Sound Elevation, which effectively raises the soundstage to feel more even with your TV screen, Voice Amplifier Pro, which gets a little too bright for my taste and proved unnecessary, and a Night Mode for lowering bass in the wee hours.

Connecting the QS90H is as easy as you’d expect from a modern premium soundbar, with most folks able to simply connect the HDMI eARC port to their TV’s corresponding port with the included cable for full-bandwidth audio. Older TVs with HDMI ARC only will compress the sound, and some may require you to engage HDMI CEC to use your TV remote for basic controls.
For network connection, you’ll be prompted to download the new Samsung Sound app. I was initially annoyed at the need to download yet another dedicated Samsung app, but the bar connected quickly and the app’s layout and design are much friendlier than the broader Samsung SmartThings app.
As I expected, the QS90H automatically chose Samsung’s Q-Symphony mode when connecting to my review TV, designed to combine the S90H and soundbar in concert for bigger, more directional surround sound. No offense to the 2.1-channel system in Samsung’s slimline OLED (actually, some offense), but the sound was much better when I pulled the TV out of the chain. On the other hand, when I dropped the HDMI cable and connected to the TV wirelessly, I was pleased to find no major loss in fidelity, providing a clean way to lose a cable.
As for the app, it’s responsive and relatively intuitive, laying out nearly everything on the main page for quick access to settings like EQ, sound modes, woofer and channel levels, and add-on speakers like Samsung’s SWA-9500S wireless surrounds ($297.99). If you want to go more hands-on, the Standard sound mode provides a full multi-band EQ rather than just treble and bass, though it didn’t sound as clear to me by default.
The app is also helpful for streaming, though not in the same way as Sonos’ app and its 100+ built-in streaming services. Instead, Samsung simply points you to a few suggested services for streaming directly, like Spotify Connect. However, as I’ve noticed in other soundbars like Samsung’s own HW-Q990H ($1,997.99), changing volume within Spotify awkwardly moves the level multiple notches per tap, forcing me to go back to the Samsung app or remote for more precise control. It’s an annoying quirk, but not uncommon.

I knew Samsung’s new bar had something cooking when its sweeping, theatrical soundstage repeatedly drew my attention away from its sister model OLED, a fantastic performer in its own right. From crashing ocean tides and thunderous symphonic backing tracks of nature shows like Netflix’s Our Planet to the haunting dialogue and bellowing muscle cars of Mad Max: Fury Road, I was increasingly distracted and drawn to the sound behind the sights.
In many ways, the QS90H reminds me of a dressed-down version of one of my favorite standalone soundbars ever, the now-decommissioned Sony HT-A7000. The QS90H doesn’t offer the same level of near-holographic virtual surround, and it doesn’t sound quite as big either, but like Sony’s bar, it does a great job focusing on fundamental bass. The Quad Bass’ potency anchors the rest of the sound for a pulse-raising experience with your best content. Just as impressively, it does for much less than the A7000’s original $1,300 list price.
The QS90H does a fine job with regular fare like sitcoms and light dramas, with upfront dialogue even in muddled scenes, and often with some solid definition. It can sometimes sound thin, but details like the click of a gun or a creaking door pop out for a major upgrade over regular TV sound.
The QS90H is at its best when barreling through sweeping effects across the front of its soundstage with well-mixed films and TV shows. Bombastic soundtracks like the pumping percussion, flashy brass, and crunching car crashes in Sean Mendes’ Skyfall pull you in with a theatrical wall of sound. The depth and immersion increase further with Dolby Atmos content. Going back to Netflix’s Our Planet, scenes like the convergence of a pod of humpback whales provide palpable intensity as the giant sea creatures rise and crash with their massive dripping jaws slamming shut.

Testing more primed Atmos content like the “Amaze” scene from Dolby’s demo test disc, the QS90H effectively immerses you in jungle insects at the intro, while the storm scene brings some raucous thunder and a well-defined crescendo of rain overhead. The soundbar feels closer to cheaper systems like Klipsch’s Core 200 than the Arc Ultra here, with scenes like a bird flying behind you or the swirling vacuum in Marvel’s Ant-Man offering more dimensionality from Sonos’ model. Still, there’s enough to feel the hemispheric expansion that makes 3D audio so exciting, including the occasional “brush past your face” effect, and the hearty bass response helps elevate the other elements for a fun ride.
When it comes to music, the QS90H provides a pleasing presentation, led by its forward bass and solid clarity up top. Acoustic guitars have a warm, natural tone, while horns and strings come through with pleasing fluidity. Piano and vocals carry convincing presence. Instruments like a tight snare and trap set come through cleanly, and pad instruments spread out nicely across the bar’s wide frame, though particularly bright instruments sometimes sound brittle. You’ll find better overall instrumental definition in speakers like Denon’s Home 400, but the QS90H does about as well as I’d expect from its thin profile.
Dipping into some Dolby Atmos Music over AirPlay from Amazon Music Unlimited opened up the soundstage significantly. While most tracks are primarily confined to the front of the room, there’s expansive spacing, including some subtle effects that seem to slip toward your ears in tracks like Elton John’s “Goodbye, Yellow Brick Road” and George Harrison’s “My Sweet Lord.” John Batiste’s “Freedom” sounds fuller in Atmos, with some nuanced spherical effects and better spacing than the stereo version. Like much of the QS90H’s performance, the song leans foremost on its full and musical bass for an impressive listen.
Samsung’s latest all-in-one Dolby Atmos bar won’t replace Sonos at the top of the heap, and its 3D audio effects are middle of the pack for its price, but its mix of heart-pounding bass and versatile features makes it an excellent new option, especially for Samsung TV owners. It also offers some traditional features Sonos and other rivals lack, like full DTS support, a spare HDMI input, and a dedicated remote.
Not for nothing, the QS90H’s $1,000 list price is likely to come down quickly, helping it undercut Sonos, Bose, and several others. In fact, as I write this, the QS90H is already on sale for $800, making it a serious value. Those looking for a slim and powerful one-piece Dolby Atmos system to pair with a newer Samsung TV, or simply to upgrade their aging TV audio setup, will find a game companion in the QS90H.
★★★★★★★★★★ Performance
★★★★★★★★★★ Usability
★★★★★★★★★★ Build Quality
★★★★★★★★★★ Value
A new backdoor dubbed Mistic has been observed in financially motivated attacks targeting organizations in the insurance, education, IT, and professional services sectors.
The malware is believed to be linked to KongTuke/Woodgnat, an initial access broker active since at least 2024 that specializes in compromising corporate networks and selling that access to ransomware groups, including Qilin, Interlock, Rhysida, Akira, 8Base, and Black Basta.
Researchers at cybersecurity company Symantec say that Mistic has been used in intrusions since April.
In at least one incident, it was deployed shortly after ModeloRAT, a backdoor attributed to KongTuke and delivered via social engineering attacks over Microsoft Teams.
Symantec believes that Mistic is a newly developed, stealthy backdoor designed for long-term persistence in compromised networks.
In the attacks investigated by Symantec, the infection started with the launch of the legitimate executable MpExtMs.exe to side-load a malicious DLL named version.dll, which acts as the loader of Mistic (EndpointDlp.dll).
The researchers note that the filename chosen for Mistic resembles Microsoft endpoint security tooling, which may help the malware blend in with trusted software on the host.
A separate .NET DLL is also loaded, which displays a fake login screen to the victim to steal their account credentials.
Once loaded, Mistic communicates with its command-and-control infrastructure and can receive commands from the operator. Symantec lists the following capabilities:
According to Symantec’s analysis, Mistic appears to have been designed for stealth, enabling attackers to maintain a persistent foothold within compromised networks over extended periods.
“The backdoor runs payloads in memory with no file written to disk and includes a kill switch that lets it delete itself, which are features consistent with an operator seeking long-term, low-visibility access,” the researchers say.
Symantec does not provide details on how the infection begins, but KongTuke has been known to use ClickFix, and its FileFix and CrashFix variants, since early 2025 to deliver the ModeloRAT malware.
In a technical report this week, cloud security company Zscaler notes that Mistic, which it tracks as MTLBackdoor, was delivered as a payload in a multi-stage ClickFix infection chain in May.
Zscaler researchers say that “one of the most powerful features [in MTLBackdoor] is the ability to load Beacon Object Files (BOFs) to expand its capabilities.”
BOFs are small programs in C that can execute directly in the memory of a command-and-control (C2) process, leaving no footprint on the disk and evading detection of security agents. They are common in red team products, such as Cobalt Strike, for the post-exploitation stage.
Symantec believes that Mistic confirms the observed trend of custom tools being used in ransomware attacks, although the backdoor appears to have been developed by an initial access broker closely connected to the ransomware scene.
KongTuke is known to use multiple other tools, such as the legitimate WinPython and Node.js runtimes to execute malicious code, finger.exe to retrieve obfuscated payloads, the fake NexShield browser extension, the encrypted GateKeeper .NET payload, and the MintsLoader and D3F@ck Loader malware loaders to deliver additional payloads.
Both Zscaler and Symantec reports [1, 2] provide indicators of compromise for the Mistic/MTLBackdoor malware and note that it is a stealthy tool that can expand its functionality.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Day 2 of Prime Day 2026 deepens Apple discounts, led by a new $100 markdown on every iPad mini 7 configuration, alongside record-low prices on AirPods Max 2 and the Apple Watch Series 11. Here are the deals worth buying.
The second day of Prime Day is well underway, with Apple’s iPad mini getting a steeper markdown at $100 off. Plus, grab some of the year’s lowest prices on dozens of products before Amazon’s shopping event ends.
AirPods prices have dipped to as low as $99 this Prime Day, with AirPods Pro 3 coming in as a top-seller this Prime Day. The 2026 AirPods Max 2 have also hit a record-low $399, making it an attractive purchase this Prime Day.
Apple’s second-generation AirTag has been priced at MSRP since its release, but Amazon issued a material discount on both the single pack and 4-pack for Prime Day.
Amazon launched a steeper iPad mini discount on Wednesday, with a $100 markdown across all of the configurations. You can score deals from just $299 in our iPad Price Guide.
Day 2 of the Prime Day shopping event is seeing stockouts on several Apple Watch deals, but there’s also a new markdown worth checking out. This 46mm cellular Series 11 model is now $150 off.
Prime Day deals are available on Mac computers as well, with Apple’s budget-friendly MacBook Neo dipping to $589.99.
M5 MacBook Air models are also as low as $949, while B&H is running a DealZone on June 24 only on a closeout M4 15-inch MacBook Air.
Compare prices across dozens of configurations in our Mac Price Guide.
Whether you need a new case to freshen up your iPhone or are looking for a dock for your Mac to connect peripherals, there are Prime Day deals offering up to 71% off.
security
‘Permanent biometric surveillance of the public square’ incompatible with policing by consent, say critics
The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) will start using static live facial recognition (LFR) cameras in London’s West End and Soho by the end of this year following a six-month pilot in the south London borough of Croydon.

Static LFR involves the police temporarily attaching cameras to lampposts or similar infrastructure, with the feeds monitored remotely and officers on the ground stopping people whom the technology matches to images on its watchlist. The MPS said that each of the 24 deployments in central Croydon between October 2025 and March 2026 used a bespoke watchlist created up to 24 hours in advance and deleted afterward.
Civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, which in April lost a High Court challenge to police use of LFR, said the force was rushing ahead with deployment before Parliament has passed legislation regulating the technology’s use. “We are calling on the Met to stop this experiment until, at least, Parliament has spoken,” Jack Coulson, the group’s head of advocacy, said in a press release. “Policing by consent is a cultural inheritance we must protect. Permanent biometric surveillance of the public square is incompatible with that ideal.”
He highlighted the case of Alvi Choudhury, a Southampton man arrested and held for ten hours in January after a retrospective LFR system run by Thames Valley Police matched him to a crime committed in Milton Keynes, a city he had never visited. “It is predictable, given the technology’s racial bias, that Mr Choudhury was confused for another Asian man,” said Coulson.
The MPS said that in Croydon more than 470,000 people walked past the LFR cameras, leading to 173 arrests and one false alert, which resulted in officers stopping someone without arresting them, realizing the mistake, and letting them go. The force added that one of those arrested, a registered sex offender who was communicating with a child under 16, was subsequently sentenced to two years in prison in May for breaching a sexual harm prevention order and making indecent images of children.
MPS Commissioner Mark Rowley said on June 24 that the force planned to “significantly step up our use of technology to fundamentally change how we protect the public” through the use of live LFR, a city-wide emergency services drone network, and AI to analyze the footage from the capital’s one million CCTV cameras. Rowley added that the force needs to spend more on technology but its budgets for doing so have been repeatedly cut, with spending of around £6,000 per person compared with budgets of more than double that at some government agencies.
Earlier this month, the commissioner said the MPS would have to cut around 700 frontline posts after London’s deputy mayor for policing and crime, Kaya Comer-Schwartz, refused to approve its plan to award a major contract to controversial US supplier Palantir. ®
Irresistible force, meet immovable object. Tech leaders are under pressure to satisfy growing demand for AI while keeping a lid on costs.
That is becoming harder as Anthropic, OpenAI, and GitHub shift some services away from flat-rate subscriptions toward usage-based billing. Database vendors claim they can help by cutting the number of calls made to AI models and handling the new workloads generated by developer agents.
According to IDC research director Devin Pratt, “demand for the underlying capability is strong, because agentic adoption is already broad.”
Around 79 percent of organizations are either investing significantly in agentic AI with a set budget or already running agentic applications in production, according to IDC.
“The appetite for the data infrastructure beneath it is real,” Pratt said. “The open question is whether the specialists win or the capability gets absorbed into the platforms enterprises already run, much as it did with vector databases.”
Among the specialists taking on the omnipresent cloud platforms and their embedded data services is Pinecone. It carved out a niche as a vector database vendor for users wanting to put LLMs into production. Although that term became commonplace among mainstream database companies, Pinecone always argued it maintained a technical advantage for the biggest use cases.
Building on top of its vector database technology, the vendor has recently launched Nexus – a “knowledge engine, not a retrieval system” – and embedded it in Microsoft’s OneLake, a hybrid data lake and data warehouse environment.
Pinecone’s idea is that by compiling a knowledge base of an organization’s data structure and content, its technology can avoid burning through tokens back and forth between the data and AI agents. Nexus is designed to structure, contextualize, and compose specialized contexts – derived artifacts – in advance of agent demand.
Pinecone product veep Jeff Zhu told The Register the idea was to prevent agents from repeating the same work to understand the structure of business data and its context.
“All these coding agents, for example, are really good at doing a bunch of exploratory work if you ask them a question,” Zhu said. “It’s going to make a call, get the table schema, do some exploratory work, figure out what the top rows of this one table are, and ultimately it will eventually get to the right answer most of the time, but it’s going to burn through a bunch of tokens, because every single time it creates a specific answer to a question, it has to understand your business context and rediscover it every single time.”
Nexus provides a semantic layer of business data for a given use case or outcome. Imagine a finance analyst agent versus an HR agent: it is very possible they could use the same data, but they would want very different outcomes as a result, Zhu said.
“Our system is an engine that can support any number of use cases. Based on your particular use case, and the tasks that you want to accomplish, we use your data sources – which can be SQL databases, unstructured documents, PDFs, and so on – we build a task-specific context which is used for that individual agent’s job or role.”
IDC’s Pratt said that the hard part of agentic deployments has shifted from the model to the data plumbing around it. Agents reason continuously and act on live data, and the traditional split between operational stores, analytical warehouses, vector indexes, and the pipelines stitching them together was built for humans, not software running in loops. A recent IDC Data Management survey found that the two biggest data roadblocks IT leaders name for scaling generative and agentic AI are security and compliance constraints and cost. Fragmentation compounds it, with nearly two-thirds of organizations running 11 or more distinct database technologies.
Pratt said Pinecone is betting that retrieval as practiced today does not scale to agents and that, rather than have an agent rediscover and re-read raw content on every call, Nexus does the reasoning once, upstream, and stores reusable, task-specific context. The idea is credible, and the positioning is smart, moving Pinecone from a vector database to a knowledge layer. Its query language, KnowQL, also includes a budget primitive, and the platform gives a single dashboard for token usage and spend. By doing that work once rather than on every inference call, the design directly addresses one of IT leaders’ chief concerns: cost.
“What is interesting about Nexus is that it treats cost as a design constraint, not an afterthought, with a budget control and token accounting built into the query layer. That is exactly where IT leaders feel the pain,” Pratt said.
Changes in the wider tech landscape have previously forced new ways of looking at databases and related software. The market responded to the so-called Big Data problem – the staggering volume of information generated by mobile devices and web clickstream data – with Hadoop and Apache Spark. The former has largely been superseded; the latter is still very much with us. The demands consumers and businesses place on globally scaled web systems prompted a generation of NoSQL databases like Couchbase, Cassandra, and MongoDB, as well as new distributed relational databases.
Another database vendor hoping to help tech teams manage the escalating costs of deploying AI agents is Tiger Data, the company behind the PostgreSQL time-series database TimescaleDB. It has built Ghost, a technology designed specifically for developers working with AI agents.
The company argues that agents helping build software experiment constantly and need isolation to do it safely. When an agent fails, the blast radius should be one database, not a shared environment that other agents and humans depend on. The Ghost platform offers instant PostgreSQL databases with fast forking, which agents can access through the Ghost CLI or MCP server. It comes with a terabyte of free storage.
Ajay Kulkarni, co-founder and CEO of Tiger Data, told The Register the company had also adopted a new database charging model better suited to AI agents, which typically produce spikes and falls in demand.
“Instead of being packaged at the traditional database level, we provide usage-based pricing at the compute-hour level, so no matter how many databases you have – it could be one, it could be 50 – it’ll cost the same, and you’ll just be metered by how many compute hours you consume,” Kulkarni said.
Tiger Data offers a free tier with 100 compute-hours per month. Users can pay for additional usage in 15-minute active windows. “That really allows for experimentation and allows for this idea of multiple databases, with every agent getting its own database, because you’re not paying on that dimension, you’re paying on the compute-hour dimension,” he said.
IDC’s Pratt said Ghost solves a different but equally concrete problem. It gives each agent or task its own disposable PostgreSQL database, allowing an agent to branch a dataset in seconds and discard it afterward. Because billing is based on usage rather than the number of databases, Tiger Data offers a practical way for organizations to stay with PostgreSQL. However, many Postgres vendors are racing toward the same capability.
“Ghost is the most pragmatic of these. It hands each agent a throwaway PostgreSQL workspace to experiment in without risking production, and by staying on PostgreSQL it asks IT teams to learn almost nothing new,” he said.
Pratt argued that agent-ready data infrastructure is turning into its own category, and the platform vendors are the ones to watch. On the context and vector side, Pinecone competes with companies such as Weaviate and Qdrant, as well as the pgvector ecosystem inside every Postgres distribution. On the agent workspace side, Tiger Data’s Ghost sits alongside Neon, now owned by Databricks, and Supabase.
Bigger platform vendors such as Snowflake, Oracle, and Microsoft are also absorbing these capabilities into the stacks customers know well.
“The independents are defining these categories, but watch the platform vendors. Most organizations tell us they expect to do their vector work inside the database or lakehouse they already run, not in a separate specialist tool,” Pratt said.
Aaron Rosenbaum, Gartner senior director analyst, said that building this context layer is critical for both token efficiency and better answers. “We’ve seen significant development across the industry; Snowflake introduced Horizon Context; Databricks introduced Genie Ontology, and we will see significant growth in the quality and depth of new tools introduced throughout the year. While most of the leading data platform vendors have their own solution, there will be enterprises that look for solutions independent of those platforms that Pinecone Nexus can address,” he said.
He also noted that there was a string of vendors examining the different DBMS workloads created by agents compared with those created by humans.
“It’s driving new innovation across the industry right now,” Rosenbaum said.
As technology leaders try to negotiate better deals with AI providers to keep costs down, they can also look to their data platforms to ease the financial burden created by the often-unmanaged surge in demand from AI workloads.
“There are many options available today from all the major providers, and no clear leader has emerged. History has shown that the established DBMS vendors have been very agile at supporting new workloads, and it’s likely that will continue,” Rosenbaum said. ®
alternative_right shares a report from ScienceAlert: If you consumed a wild mushroom and suddenly started seeing tiny people around you, you might reasonably assume it contained a familiar psychedelic. But that does not appear to be the case with Lanmaoa asiatica, known locally as jian shou qing, a mushroom species sold in markets in Yunnan, southwestern China. When eaten undercooked, the mushroom can produce vivid visions of miniature people — not unlike Gulliver on his travels to Lilliput. To try and find out the root cause, University of Utah mycologists Colin Domnauer and Bryn Dentinger sequenced the genomes of 53 mushroom samples from across the wider Lanmaoa genus. And despite the reported hallucinations, they found no close matches to genes associated with psilocybin or ibotenic acid, two well-known mushroom hallucinogens whose biosynthetic pathways were specifically examined in the study.
“Biosynthetic gene mining of the L. asiatica genome found no close hits with any genes known in the production of mushroom psychoactive compounds,” write the researchers in their published paper. “This supports our hypothesis of the presence of a novel unidentified metabolite responsible for the unique hallucinogenic properties of L. asiatica.” […] Whatever chemical pathways are causing these effects in the brain, the responsible compound appears to be something scientists have not yet identified. […] By identifying 1,515 corresponding genes across the selected specimens, the researchers obtained a clearer answer to the question of what defines a mushroom species as part of the genus Lanmaoa. There are now 17 recognized species in the genus, including four that haven’t been identified before, two of which the researchers specifically named here: Lanmaoa fallax and Lanmaoa carbonilivor. The researchers say the Lanmaoa family and evolutionary tree can now be more fully mapped out, and some existing specimens may need to be reclassified.
We’ve been waiting for the Pixel Watch 4 to hit a price that’s friendly on the wallet, and Prime Day has finally made that happen.
The Google Pixel Watch 4 is now £239 this Prime Day, £110 off the usual £349, making it 32% cheaper and the lowest our deals expert can remember this dropping to.
Google’s Pixel Watch 4 has fallen to an all‑time‑low Prime Day price, slicing 32% off — making it well worth your time, pun included
Google’s Pixel Watch 4 has fallen to an all‑time‑low Prime Day price, shaving 32% off and making it well worth your time.

That price drop opens up a watch built around a display that earns its place, with the Actua 360 running to 3,000 nits of peak brightness and wrapping the full face rather than stopping short at a flat edge.
Battery runs to 40 hours on a single charge with Google’s fastest charging yet, which means wearing it through the night for sleep tracking and through the next day without it becoming a daily charging ritual.
Heart rate accuracy sits at the core of what the Pixel Watch 4 does differently, feeding into sleep insights, recovery data, and workout guidance in a way that builds a picture of your health over time rather than just logging individual sessions.


Gemini sits on the wrist and responds to natural questions about your health data, training load, or whatever else you’d normally pull your phone out to check, which removes one of the small frictions that adds up across a day.
Loss of Pulse Detection can identify a cardiac event and prompt a call to emergency services automatically, and SOS satellite connectivity means it can reach help even without a mobile signal, which shifts it from useful to genuinely reassuring.
Six months of Fitbit Premium is included, unlocking deeper workout analysis and personalised suggestions for anyone who wants more than the default tracking out of the box.
If the Pixel Watch 4 isn’t quite what you’re after, we’ve tested and ranked the best smartwatches you can buy right now in our guide to the 12 Best Smartwatches, or if budget is the priority, our Best Cheap Smartwatch 2026 roundup has plenty of alternatives worth considering.
The Pixel Watch 4 is undoubtedly the best Google wearable to date; it perfects the sleek, dome-shaped design, offers a unique take on Wear OS 6 with Material 3 Expressive, Fitbit-powered fitness tracking and excellent battery life. It’s not quite as long-lasting as the OnePlus Watch 3, and Fitbit Premium gripes remain, but overall, it’s a package that most people will enjoy.
Charming take on Wear OS 6
Excellent Fitbit-powered health tracking
LTE and satellite connectivity
Multi-day battery life and rapid charging
Fitbit Premium locks some health data behind a paywall
Exposed screen could make it more prone to damage
Some AI features not available outside the US
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964
Afew weeks ago, Walled Culture wrote about Hadopi, France’s infamous copyright enforcement mechanism. The so-called “graduated response” – aka “three strikes and you are out” – has been around for over 15 years now, has cost French taxpayers a fortune, and has never achieved any of its aims. As the Walled Culture post suggested, the latest court ruling might finally put the benighted scheme out of its misery.
But even if it does, there is already another disproportionately heavy-handed attempt to enforce copyright up and running in the shape of Italy’s Piracy Shield. It works by blocking access to unauthorized material using court orders against Internet Service Providers (ISPs). That would clearly be problematic, even if it were implemented properly, and well run. It is neither, as academic research from the end of last year underlined. Since the massive extension of its powers a year ago, things have gone relatively quiet on the Piracy Shield front in terms of new developments, and there are no signs that the Italian government has taken the many criticisms to heart.
That’s depressing enough, but even more worrying is that alongside France’s Hadopi fiasco, and Italy’s troubling Piracy Shield, Spain too seems intent on letting the copyright industry attack the Internet’s basic plumbing and thereby disrupt other sites, as well as downgrading the experience of thousands of innocent users. It’s increasingly clear that what’s happening in Spain is now a serious a threat to the operation of the online world there, but one that is still little-known. That makes a post from the Disruptive Competition Project (DisCo), which comes from the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), particularly useful. Its title picks up on the similarities with Italy’s approach: “Repeating Failure: How Spanish Overblocking Ignores the Lessons of Italy’s Broken Piracy Shield”. Here’s what has been happening in Spain for over a year now:
Since early 2025, LaLiga (Spain’s top-tier football league) has been operating an aggressive and largely unchecked IP-address blocking regime in an attempt to tackle sports piracy. In 2024, LaLiga and several Spanish internet service providers (ISPs), some of whom have direct commercial interests in LaLiga broadcasting, sought a court order authorising the blocking of specific domain names.
They succeeded in this particular endeavour. However, LaLiga has thereafter continued to interpret this order as a green light to unilaterally select Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and domains to block, without ongoing court oversight or accountability.
It turns out that the legal basis of the current action is flimsy in the extreme:
The legal foundation of LaLiga’s anti-piracy enforcement model rests on a single, seven-page judgment issued by a Commercial Court in Barcelona on 18 December 2024. This ruling should have never been treated as setting a strong precedent, as it was not the result of a rigorous legal battle and didn’t seriously examine whether the blocking approach is lawful or proportionate under EU law.
As has happened so often in the world of copyright, the companies involved have taken a very narrow, and possibly flawed legal judgment and applied it as widely and broadly as possible, without asking further permission from the courts:
LaLiga now compiles and updates lists of IP addresses and domain names that it wants to see blocked. This process is completely opaque: these lists are not publicly disclosed, there is no independent technical or judicial validation before new addresses are added, and the court does not appear to continuously review any additions.
Once someone gets blocked, there is no redress mechanism to remove addresses from the list, even when they are no longer associated with infringing content, nor any appeal process for mistakenly blocked services.
It will come as no surprise to readers of this blog that this cavalier approach has already led to the overblocking of sites, just as has happened in Italy because of Piracy Shield’s poor implementation:
LaLiga’s approach has caused widespread disruption, preventing access to tens of thousands of legitimate websites in recent years – including critical services such as payment providers and a national health operator. This disproportionate cost is borne by innocent third parties and small businesses, reflecting a mistaken belief that the commercial interests of one dominant party should trump Spanish consumers’ rights to a functioning internet.
The second of those overblocking incidents is particularly serious, since it involves a healthcare provider, which potentially puts people’s lives at risk. According to an article on La Razón (via Google Translate):
During the weekend of December 13-14, access to the Madrid Health website was blocked. While the duration of the access interruption and the message displayed upon entering the website varied depending on the internet service provider blocking access at LaLiga’s request.
Despite the serious nature of this overblocking, which effectively places the enforcement of copyright above protecting people’s health, the Spanish government is trying to wash its hands of the problem:
The situation has become so severe that members of the Spanish Parliament have sought explanations from the government. While acknowledging that the blocks have significantly impacted legitimate websites, the Spanish Government maintains that this is a judicial matter falling under the jurisdiction of the courts.
However, the courts seem to be entirely on the side of LaLiga, since they didn’t even give Internet companies a chance to present their side of the story earlier this year.
In February 2026, the Commercial Court of Córdoba even granted [LaLiga] an ex-parte preliminary injunction against NordVPN and ProtonVPN. This means the court issued a binding order, based solely on LaLiga’s arguments, without notifying those virtual private networks (VPNs) or allowing them to present a defence beforehand. The VPNs only discovered the judgment through the media and are now obliged to implement the blocks enforced by LaLiga.
It’s true that the same court has just rejected LaLiga’s request for coercive fines, and accepted that there was a technical dispute over whether the blocking could be implemented. But the refusal to allow the VPN companies to present a defense remains a deeply troubling precedent, and runs contrary to basic principles of justice. Moreover, as TorrentFreak reports, this latest ruling may be only a temporary reprieve for the VPN providers:
The league confirms that the decision merely sets aside the coercive fines while the proceedings continue, stressing that it does not exempt NordVPN from implementing IP blocks where LaLiga can prove piracy is taking place.
It is the usual one-sided justice that is typical when copyright is involved. It seems that LaLiga is being given carte blanche to do whatever it likes here, and never mind the consequences for Internet companies and their users. As Hadopi fades, and Italy’s Piracy Shield carries on as before, the fear has to be that Spain’s unconstrained approach to copyright enforcement could end up being worse than both.
There is currently a rare opportunity to comment on the issue of EU copyright enforcement in the realm of sports and other live events. There is an open Call for Evidence from the European Commission, which:
aims to collect the information necessary to support the review of the 2019 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive, and to seek feedback on the challenges linked in particular to the exercise of copyright and related rights in the context of technological developments and potential ways to address them.
As well as that general review of the main EU Copyright Directive, discussed at length in Walled Culture the book (free digital versions available), and the issue of live streaming, the Commission is seeking people’s views on an important upcoming legislative proposal aimed at strengthening copyright (yet again) in the light of AI, which is planned for the first quarter of 2027. The Call for Evidence closes on 25 June, so you have a couple of weeks to hone your thoughts and submit them. Based on previous experience, we can probably expect the European Commission to ignore what anyone except the copyright industry thinks, but it’s worth a try.
Follow me @glynmoody on Mastodon and on Bluesky. Republished from WalledCulture.
Filed Under: copyright, france, hadopi, ip blocks, italy, piracy shield, spain
Companies: laliga, nordvpn, proton
Alibaba has taken the US Department of Defense to court over a label the company insists it does not deserve. In a complaint filed on Tuesday in the federal court in San Jose, California, the Hangzhou group asked a judge to strike its name from the Pentagon’s list of “Chinese military companies” and declared the designation, in its own words, to have “no basis in fact or law.”
The list in question is the one maintained under Section 1260H of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, which requires the Pentagon to name Chinese firms it judges to have direct or indirect ties to the People’s Liberation Army.
Alibaba was added on June 8, alongside Baidu, BYD, the robotics maker Unitree, and others, in an update that pushed the roster to 188 entities, up from 134 the year before.
In its filing, Alibaba argued that it is governed by an independent board, none of whom has any military affiliation, and that its products and services are built “for retail, logistics, and enterprise information technology, not weapons, defense, or intelligence.”
The Pentagon’s justification, set out in a June statement, was that the company is “a military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base” through its affiliation with China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, with an indirect link to the state asset regulator known as SASAC.
The designation does not, by itself, ban anyone from doing business with Alibaba. What it does is layer on consequences.
Under the relevant law, the Defense Department cannot enter into or renew contracts directly with listed entities from June 30, and from 2027 it cannot buy their goods or services through third parties either.
Government contracts are prized by technology firms, and the company told the court that the listing creates barriers to financing, sourcing, and partnerships with American counterparties, reducing its access to capital and raising its risk profile. It also claimed the move violates its constitutional rights to due process and free speech.
Alibaba had signalled it would fight. When the June update appeared, a company spokesperson said it was “not a Chinese military company nor part of any military-civil fusion strategy” and promised to “take all available legal action.” China’s embassy in Washington called the designations “discriminatory.”
It is not the only listed firm to reach for a lawyer. WuXi AppTec, the biotech contract research group added in the same round, filed a similar suit on June 11.
Earlier rounds drew the same complaint without the litigation: when Tencent was added in January 2025, it called its inclusion “a mistake.” The Pentagon is not required to publish evidence. The criteria turn on military-civil fusion, broad enough to sweep in companies whose main business is consumer technology.
That breadth is part of why the list has become a recurring headache for the Chinese tech sector. It sits alongside export controls on chipmaking equipment, tariffs, and the Entity List run by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, the same bureau now at the centre of a separate fight over access to advanced AI models.
For Alibaba, whose cloud division underpins much of China’s AI infrastructure and whose US footprint spans cloud, advertising, and research, the designation turns every American business relationship into a compliance calculation.
The timing did Beijing no favours. The June update landed during a fragile trade truce, and a day before Alibaba sued, China added 10 US firms to its own export control list. The two governments keep escalating in parallel while insisting they are talking.
What happens next is a matter for the court in San Jose, where Alibaba and WuXi will press their cases. The Defense Department has not commented.
The contracting bans take effect at the end of the month regardless, which means the practical clock and the legal one are running at different speeds. Alibaba is asking a judge to stop both.
The Google-owned platform has thousands of similar lawsuits pending.
Following a similar lawsuit earlier this year, Google has settled with a minor known as “R.K.C.” who claimed that social media platforms harmed them, Reuters reported. Terms of the settlement were confidential, the lawyers said yesterday. The same plaintiff also sued Meta, Snap and TikTok, with those trials set to proceed next month. YouTube has thousands of similar lawsuits pending, so this second case represents a test run for the many to follow.
“Our focus remains on building age-appropriate products and parental controls that deliver on that promise,” a Google spokesperson told Reuters in a statement, adding that the case was amicably resolved.
The first trial was brought by a 20-year-old woman known as “K.G.M.,” who also claimed harm due to the addictive nature of social media. That person won their trial and received $6 million in damages, with $3 million coming from Meta and YouTube taking on the other $3 million. YouTube vowed to launch an appeal for that case, saying it “responsibly built a streaming platform, not a social media site.”
More than 3,300 lawsuits involving social media addiction are pending in California state courts, and another 2,600 were brought by people, school districts, municipalities and states in California federal court. That’s just one state (albeit the biggest one), but it’s easy to see the size of the problem for YouTube and other platforms if each plaintiff receives a multi-million-dollar award. Social media platforms have recently settled (or are facing) lawsuits in Kentucky, New York City and numerous other US jurisdictions.
Meta and other platforms have disputed the idea that their platforms are addictive. However, a lawyer in the first case involving K.G.M. said the companies’ own communications refute those claims. “This is the first time in history a jury has heard testimony by executives and seen internal documents that we believe prove these companies chose profits over children,” Joseph VanZandt said back in March.
Weekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
Renter of Home in Anne Heche Crash Denies Settlement With Son
Microsoft accidentally kills epic Outlook email threads
Two goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
Soccer-U.S. defends Iran World Cup travel restrictions, says discussions ongoing
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
Securitize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
BBC Reporter Discusses Cross Party Criticism Of Trumps Iran Deal
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
Wall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
Andy Burnham and the meaning of Makerfield
AWS enters the context layer race with a graph that learns from agents, not manual curation
Can Charles Hoskinson Really Rescue Cardano?
HIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
Keir Starmer Allies Question His Chances For No 10
Jake Chervinsky accuses CME of protecting derivatives monopoly
Nearly 7,000 fake Amazon domains registered ahead of Prime Day 2026, researchers warn
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker says AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’ and calls Copilot agents a backdoor
Brexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests
FIFA World Cup 2026: Canada beat 9-men Qatar 6-0 to register first ever win | FIFA World Cup 2026
You must be logged in to post a comment Login