Microsoft has been steadily scaling back its China presence, closing at least 15 branch offices and joint ventures over the past five years as Beijing favors domestic software. U.S. export controls also make it harder to grow its cloud and AI businesses, leaving the market with relatively little economic upside. Reuters reports: Microsoft took a major hit from the erosion of trust between Washington and Beijing, the five people said. China has since 2017 pushed the use of domestic software, which Beijing sees as more secure and whose quality is increasingly competitive with Windows and Office. U.S. restrictions, including export controls on advanced technology, have meanwhile hindered efforts to scale Microsoft’s lucrative AI and cloud businesses in China.
[…] Microsoft ultimately decided to remain because it had carved out a profitable business servicing Chinese companies like TikTok owner ByteDance, which need Western technology to manage overseas operations, according to three people familiar with the matter. The company also believed that it needed a presence to maintain access to China’s world-class engineering talent, two of them said. Microsoft had also cultivated a relationship with the government that is among the deepest of any tech company, its former China head Alain Crozier told Reuters. “Because of the geopolitics … some days it’s a little bit harder, but we never had a crisis,” he said.
A Microsoft spokesperson did not address questions about the firm’s deliberations on its China business but said it operates in a regulatory “environment that applies to every international supplier” and that it remains committed to the Chinese market. The state of Microsoft’s China business reflects market competition, regulatory demands and technological trends, the company said.
Honor put a motorized camera arm on a regular-looking phone and started selling it in China yesterday. The device, simply called the Robot Phone, costs 9,999 yuan for the 12GB and 512GB version, roughly $1,500, with a higher 16GB and 1TB model at 12,999 yuan. Pre-orders opened immediately after the Guangzhou event, and full sales begin August 18. For now the phone stays in China.
When first turned on, the phone appears to be your standard device. Its dimensions are normal to say the least, measuring 9.59 mm thick, weighing 248 grams, and having a sleek metal body with modest, curved corners. There’s a 6.31-inch LTPO OLED display up front, which can produce 6,800 nits and switch between 1 and 120 frames per second seamlessly. All of this is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chip, which also includes a 7,060 mAh battery, rapid charging (120 watts wired, 50 watts wireless), and just IP54 water protection.
Google Pixel 10a is a durable, everyday phone with more[1]; snap brilliant photography on a simple, powerful camera, get 30+ hours out of a full…
Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan; it works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T…
Pixel 10a is sleek and durable, with a super smooth finish, scratch-resistant Corning Gorilla Glass 7i display, and IP68 water and dust protection[4]
When you press a button, or even just wave your hand, something interesting happens. A glass cover swings open, showing a small titanium gimbal protruding from the rear of the phone. Someone at Honor evidently spent a long time figuring out how to make this thing smaller, as the mechanism is 65% shorter than typical, yet it also contains over 100 precise pieces. The 2.6-gram titanium motor can spin at a staggering 360 degrees per second. Want the camera to remain in a fixed position? Or keep your first-person perspective? Perhaps you just want to spin it 90 or 180 degrees on a whim? Not a problem; the arm can do it all, and more. Once up and going, the camera maintains its level even as the rest of the phone jerks around.
Advertisement
The main sensor is also impressive, at 200 megapixels and powered by a 1/1.28-inch chip and f/1.6 lens. You get a matched 200 megapixel telephoto with 2.7 times optical zoom, as well as a 50 megapixel ultrawide lens capable of shooting at angles of up to 122 degrees. Honor has partnered with ARRI to enable the phone to take footage in 10-bit LogC3, using the official ARRI Wide Gamut and all that jazz. When you take a photo, it is processed by Honor’s H1 imaging technology, which is excellent at reducing noise and other issues. Do you want to record some serious high-speed footage? There’s no need to worry because 4K at 120 frames per second is equivalent to 1080p at 240 fps. The cherry on top is that you can import the clips directly into DaVinci Resolve with the ARRI LUTs already applied.
The software portion is where things get very interesting. When you press a few buttons or tap a couple of faces, the YOYO Robot Mode activates, autonomously following individuals and keeping the camera focused on them without your interaction. Double tap a face to lock in, even if they stroll away for a bit, and it will immediately reclaim them. Alternatively, use gesture controls to flip the arm up and start rolling.
Want to tell the camera what to do? Voice instructions are available on the menu, and you can instruct it to swap angles or turn for a specific number of seconds. Still, all of this debate about modes and capabilities misses the point: this phone can be used to create video that is nearly identical to the original. Take a solo stroll or go live on a treadmill, and the phone will track the movement with much less tremor than if you held it by hand. Group photographs are also a breeze, since the arm swings from side to side, capturing a few shots and quickly stitching them together to create a lovely, broad panorama. [Source]
Custom tools harvested whatever over-permissioned guest accounts would surrender
Someone has spent more than a year rifling through Salesforce and ServiceNow portals around the world, harvesting data that organizations accidentally left open to anyone who came looking.
Researchers at Reco have named the operation “City-Forum” after a domain connected to its infrastructure. The domain has pointed to the attacker’s server since March 2025, although exactly when the campaign began is unclear. Reco says the activity is continuing and increasing in volume.
Advertisement
Reco isn’t naming the targets, but said it spotted the attacker poking around portals belonging to telecoms companies, banks and other financial services firms, enterprise software vendors, cybersecurity companies, and public sector bodies.
“In the last year, we’ve seen many threat actors that use Aura enumeration against over-permissioned Salesforce guest users. This actor is different,” said Nitay Bachrach, senior security researcher at Reco.
On Salesforce, the attacker targets Lightning Web Runtime (LWR) sites through the UI API’s GraphQL layer, an approach Reco says it has not found documented in public research or incorporated into publicly available attack tools. Over at ServiceNow, the same operator queries a native Service Portal search endpoint that has received little public attention.
If the guest can read a record, so can anyone on the internet. That is not a platform vulnerability
Security researcher Nitay Bachrach
Advertisement
The tooling also checks whether Salesforce sites permit self-registration, potentially offering a route from anonymous guest access to an authenticated external account with permission to see considerably more data. Reco said it saw these checks across most of the Salesforce targets it examined.
“The threat actor created their own toolset, based on research and techniques which are not well documented online,” Bachrach said. “They studied the services to map different common data leak vectors – this is an advanced actor.”
This isn’t casual poking around either. Reco said the busiest Salesforce target logged more than 560,000 events from the attacker’s IP during the campaign, almost all attempts to enumerate data available to guest users.
Advertisement
Reco linked the Salesforce and ServiceNow activity to the same server, which targeted multiple organizations around the world. More unusually, the attacker hasn’t bothered changing its infrastructure: the same IP address and domain have remained in use for at least 17 months, with related custom tooling doing the rounds across both platforms.
ServiceNow told us it is “aware of a security company’s blog post claiming certain configurations are creating security risk. As noted in the security company’s post, there are no allegations of a compromise of the ServiceNow environment. Nonetheless, we take third party reports seriously and are investigating accordingly. Our priority is to protect our customers, their data, and our systems.”
Salesforce has not yet responded to The Register‘s questions.
Salesforce customers have already had one very public lesson in what can happen when guest access gets too generous. In March, ShinyHunters told The Register it had stolen data from around 100 high-profile companies and nearly 400 websites after going after over-permissioned Experience Cloud guest accounts.
Advertisement
City-Forum isn’t doing quite the same thing, and Reco isn’t blaming ShinyHunters. “We don’t know who this is, and we’re not ruling anyone in or out,” Bachrach said.
Reco says all the activity it observed was conducted without authentication, with the attacker collecting information that organizations had exposed through permissions, sharing rules, search sources, or other configuration choices.
“If the guest can read a record, so can anyone on the internet,” Bachrach warned. “That is not a platform vulnerability.”
Which is good news for Salesforce and ServiceNow, perhaps, but rather less comforting for anyone now wondering what their guest account has been showing the guests. ®
At VB Transform 2026, Kel Vanee, MVP of machine learning engineering at Capital One, spoke with Sam Witteveen, Senior Technology Contributor at VentureBeat, about how the bank built a scalable multi-agent AI architecture around deeply customized open-weight models rather than relying on an off-the-shelf foundation model.
“At Capital One, we’re not just using AI, we’re building AI,” Vanee said.
Advertisement
The groundwork was laid years ago with Capital One’s early investments in data transformation and cloud adoption, which Vanee said were foundational to moving quickly when the current wave of AI arrived. That technical foundation enabled the company to make several deliberate architectural decisions, including building a centralized, enterprise-wide AI platform with built-in governance, deeply customizing open models with proprietary data, and constructing its own multi-agent orchestration harness.
Customizing open-weight models with proprietary data
Rather than relying solely on off-the-shelf frontier models, Capital One fine-tunes open-weight models using its rich, proprietary data.
“We view our data as a huge advantage and something that nobody else has, something that the general frontier models cannot provide. So we are taking that data and deeply customizing these models,” Vanee explained. He added that real-time data is absolutely critical to bring in fresh context during live customer or associate interactions.
Vanee also revealed an unexpected benefit of this approach: extensibility across the enterprise.
Advertisement
“As we customize those open-source models for one use case, we actually see benefits across our whole portfolio,” he noted. “We are training that model to be an expert at Capital One use cases, policy, and nomenclature. As we do that training, we see a general lift.”
Inside Capital One’s multi-agentic AI workflow
As an example of the approach, Vanee pointed to a customer-service workflow for bank fraud that handles millions of calls a year, where interactions range from roughly four minutes to as long as sixty minutes, and where an initial attempt at engaging a single large language model proved insufficient. With Capital One’s multi-agentic workflow (MACAW), interactions are routed through specialized agents with governance and guardrails built in.
“The MACAW workflow is made up of a number of different agents,” he said. “The first one is an understanding agent. Its purpose is to look at what the customer is saying and try to understand what their intention is.”
From there, a reasoning agent is given several specific instructions to generate a summary; a validation agent fact-checks the summary to ensure it is accurate; and an explaining agent turns the summary into a formatted document with all necessary details that is then shared with agents.
Advertisement
For the consumer banking use case, this workflow helps several hundred customer-service agents who specialize in complex fraud calls. The post-call summaries it generates help document long, back-and-forth interactions that agents previously had to reconstruct by hand.
Capital One’s multi-agentic architecture also underpins Chat Concierge, a customer-facing auto-shopping assistant, which further leverages a version of Meta’s open-weight Llama model that has been customized with Capital One’s proprietary data. It uses the same division of labor, with one agent conversing with the customer, one building an action plan from business rules, one evaluating accuracy, and one explaining and validating the result.
Optimizing latency and cost with an agentic research system
Beyond customer-facing solutions, Capital One is also leveraging agentic AI to automate rote tasks for its employees and help them focus on high-leverage aspects of their work. In one example, the company built an autonomous agentic optimization solution to tune backend hosting infrastructure.
Vanee explained that in the world of LLMs, where new optimizations are delivered every day, they aren’t all complementary. Combining two good optimizations can sometimes cause a performance regression.
Advertisement
“This agentic system will run through a search space that is designed by the researcher, handle all the mechanics of setting up that experiment and running the experiment, and then put a whole summarization of the results in front of the researcher,” Vanee said.
Vanee added that the system allows researchers to “find the series of optimizations and configurations that’s really going to give [them] the best latency possible.”
What’s next: model routing and proactive, event-driven AI
Looking ahead, one big trend Vanee sees is routing abstraction layers that a platform seeks to validate over multiple models, both for cost and accuracy.
“We actually think that you can get better accuracy than any individual model simply by routing across a broader set of available models, because different models are going to excel in different areas,” he said.
Advertisement
His second prediction was a shift toward systems that act without waiting to be asked, while also emphasizing that deploying such proactive agents would demand rigorous testing and monitoring.
“The thing I think is going to become bigger in the future is more proactive and event-driven AI,” Vanee said. Rather than waiting for a human prompt, AI would step in as soon as it detects conditions that warrant action.
“This is going to enable more monitoring and larger-scale monitoring, and it’ll empower us as we fight fraud and address these opportunities,” Vanee said. “So proactive AI is going to be a really important trend.”
Driving continuous AI innovation in financial services
Capital One’s approach underscores a broader truth for enterprise technology leaders: driving measurable value with AI requires moving beyond off-the-shelf software toward deeply customized, highly governed architectures. By combining fine-tuned open-weight models, a multi-agent orchestration harness, and proprietary data assets, the bank has established a repeatable blueprint for deploying scalable AI in financial services.
Advertisement
“All of those ingredients were absolutely critical to differentiating in this space and hitting the quality bars as well as the cost and latency thresholds we set for ourselves,” Vanee said.
As the company expands these capabilities across new use cases, its enterprise platform approach helps to ensure that technical breakthroughs translate into safer, faster, and more personalized experiences for its millions of customers.
Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact sales@venturebeat.com.
Specialised engineers and consultants trained through OpenAI’s partner network will work directly with clients on solutions.
OpenAI – in its latest effort to garner enterprise support – has teamed up with IBM to provide organisations with its tools to scale AI deployment.
The deal will see the two companies create industry-specific, go-to-market initiatives targeted at financial services, government, telecommunications and retail sectors, and comes at a time when AI investments are surging multi-fold despite only a fraction of businesses seeing real returns.
“While enterprises are rapidly investing in AI, they are looking for practical ways to apply it across their core operations to deliver measurable business outcomes and create new commercial models,” said Andy Baldwin, the global senior vice-president at IBM Consulting.
Advertisement
“The challenge is not access to AI technologies – it’s integrating AI securely and at scale into complex enterprise environments and workflows.”
The partnership embeds OpenAI’s latest frontier models, including GPT-5.6 and products like Codex and ChatGPT Work, into IBM’s AI platform.
IBM said it will deploy units of specialised engineers and consultants trained through OpenAI’s partner network to work directly with clients to accelerate AI implementation across complex business workflows and highly regulated environments.
The technology giant is also launching a dedicated channel through which more of its consultants and engineers can be certified under the partner network.
Advertisement
The two also said they will expand their collaboration as part of OpenAI’s cybersecurity partnership programme Daybreak by combining the AI giant’s frontier capabilities with IBM’s multi-agent-powered service for delivering decision-making and intelligence.
With this, the collaborators aim to help clients manage both cyber and AI model risk, including application-layer vulnerabilities, governance gaps and operational risks that limits AI adoption, they said.
“The organisations pulling ahead with AI are the ones turning it into a trusted part of how their business operates,” said Denise Dresser, the chief revenue officer at OpenAI.
The Samsung 990 is a solid PCIe 4.0 SSD with middle-of-the-pack sequential and random performance that’s decently brisk, alongside sensible capacity options and decent durability. For a more value-oriented drive, though, its retail pricing is some of the most baffling I’ve seen.
Solid speeds
Single-sided design is handy for PS5 use
Speedy file transfer rates
Heinously expensive
Performance not as strong as rivals
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208689
Advertisement
Key Features
PCIe 4.0 Standard:
The 990 is a PCIe 4.0 SSD, meaning you’re getting blazing fast speeds for its standard. It may not be as quick as a Gen 5 option, but this one is using as much of the Gen 4 standard as it can.
Advertisement
Up to 2TB capacity:.
It also comes in reasonable capacities up to 2TB to make it a solid choice for storing a good range of games and apps on
Advertisement
PC and PS5 compatible:
The 990 will play nicely in a compatible M.2 slot for PC use, while its speeds also make it compatible with PS5, as long as you grab an inexpensive heatsink.
Advertisement
Introduction
In its infinite wisdom, Samsung has decided now is the ideal time to release an ‘affordable’ PCIe 4.0 SSD with its 990 drive.
That’s a bit of an odd decision with the high pricing we’re seeing for memory and storage given the current circumstances, but I nonetheless appreciate its efforts. The new 990 is, to all intents and purposes, a QLC-based variant of its PCIe 5.0 990 Evo Plus drive, and aims to bring another option for folks wanting a cheaper PCIe 4.0 SSD for use in a PC or PS5.
There is some stiff competition that Samsung has to go up against, with the likes of the WD Black SN7100 and the Crucial P310 both key rivals, and the brand has to do it with a drive that’s $269.99 for the 1TB variant I have here. Even with the current circumstances, that pricing feels baffling.
Nonetheless, I’ve been using the 990 in my PC for the last couple of weeks to see if it’s one of the best SSDs we’ve tested. Let’s find out.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Specs
Solid storage options on offer
No DRAM cache as HMB is used instead
Reasonable endurance rating and warranty
The 990 isn’t overly exciting by way of looks, with an all-black frame and a small sticker on the front showing the Samsung logo and model designation over the NAND chips.
It is a single-sided drive for better thermals under a heatsink, and this is a drive that’s compatible with both PC and PS5, being both the standard M.2 2280 size and form factor that’ll fit in the respective PCIe 4.0 slot.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The sample I have is a 1TB option, although it is also possible to get the 990 in a larger 2TB model if you want more storage.
Advertisement
The controller that the 990 features is Samsung’s own PiccoloQ controller – the same as in the 990 Evo Plus – while the NAND is also Samsung’s own V9 QLC. You won’t find a DRAM cache here, either, as Samsung has opted to go for HMB, the same as with the WD Black SN7100.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
This isn’t uncommon for more affordable drives and isn’t a big issue for most use cases outside of intensive scientific computing, instead using system RAM for caching data as opposed to a dedicated cache on the drive itself.
One thing that is strange is that the speeds of the drive aren’t consistent across the range. The 2TB drive is slightly faster in terms of its sequential reads as well as its random read and write speeds. It’s because the 2TB variant has enough flash memory working in parallel to make the most of the controller and to get more optimal performance.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The reliability here is scaled across the two capacities, with Samsung offering a 400TBW for the 1TB model and 800TBW for the 2TB variant. This is in line with key rivals, although isn’t as spectacular as other drives we’ve tested, such as the Kingston Fury Renegade‘s 2000TBW rating.
Advertisement
Full Specs
Samsung 990
Crucial T500
WD Black SN7100
Crucial P310
Connector
M.2-2280
M.2-2280
M.2-2280
M.2-2280
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Model Variants
1TB, 2TB
500GB, 1TB, 2TB
500GB, 1TB, 2TB
500GB, 1TB, 2TB
Read Speed
7250MB/s
7400 MB/s
7250 MB/s
7100 MB/s
Release Date
2026
2023
2024
2024
Storage Capacity (Sample)
1TB
2TB
1TB
2TB
USA RRP (2TB)
$529.99
$149.99
$149.99
$137.99
Write Speed
6450 MB/s
7000 MB/s
6900 MB/s
6000 MB/s
Test Setup
Of course, for testing any quantity of PC components, SSDs included, I needed to make sure I had a solid PC to do so. Hence, I took the decision back in early 2024 to upgrade my ailing HP pre-built to a fully custom rig with a system that benefits from brisk gaming performance and excellent compatibility with modern and future hardware.
The long and short of the setup is that the Samsung 990 was placed in a compatible PCIe 4.0 x4 slot on my B650E motherboard, and then a range of real-world and synthetic tests were run. These included the classic CrystalDiskMark 8 with its Sequential speeds at a queue depth of 8 and 1, as well as its Random 4K performance at depths of Q32 and Q1. The Sequential tests are handy in proving the actual raw speed of the drive for fast file copies and access, while the Random 4K tests are more indicative of loading a game up.
For the usefulness of a quantifiable ranking, I’ve also included the Quick System Drive and Data Drive benchmarks from the PCMark 10 suite.
Advertisement
As for real-world testing, I’ve elected to see the transfer rates in moving over a set of test files totalling 120GB (in reality, a set of ripped Blu-Rays of recent Marillion concert film and hi-res audio) using the Windows File Explorer, noting down its average transfer rate, and to see the speeds at which it can move over the 110GB Dirt Rally 2.0 using Steam. As for game loading times, I’ve taken note of how quickly the Optimus GX7100M runs the Final Fantasy XIV Endwalker standalone benchmark running at 1080p and Maximum settings, as is consistent with our other testing.
Performance
Decent sequential performance
Random performance in the ballpark against rivals
PCMark10 results are a little off
The 990 served up some decent results across the wide range of tests put in front of it, with some good numbers in the CrystalDiskMark tests that match well against the claimed speeds from Samsung.
As for its top-line results, this Samsung SSD provided solid sequential speeds of 7208.62 MB/s for reads and 5762.93 MB/s for writes. The reads are in line with Samsung’s own claims, although the writes fall short of both its claims and those of rivals from Crucial and WD.
Advertisement
Samsung 990
Crucial P310
WD Black SN7100
CrystalDiskMark 8 Sequential Q8 Reads
7208.62 MB/s
7168.54 MB/s
7220.65 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Sequential Q8 Writes
5762.93 MB/s
6342.99 MB/s
6941.71 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Sequential Q1 Reads
3813.36 MB/s
3949.65 MB/s
4977.82 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Sequential Q1 Writes
5530.19 MB/s
4845.48 MB/s
6093.20 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Random 4K Q32 Reads
521.89 MB/s
622.54 MB/s
804.82 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Random 4K Q32 Writes
319.28 MB/s
342.03 MB/s
593.95 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Random 4K Q1 Reads
68.14 MB/s
50.19 MB/s
103.41 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 8 Random 4K Q1 Writes
218.09 MB/s
221.11 MB/s
240.44 MB/s
FFXIV Endwalker Benchmark Loadtime
8.48 seconds
7.87 seconds
7.96 seconds
PCMark 10 QSD Benchmark
2217
2882
3043
PCMark 10 Data Drive Benchmark
3240
4190
4425
120GB Real World File Copy Test
40.3 seconds
37.3 seconds
46.66 seconds
However, its results at the Q1 level were somewhat behind in some areas, while its 4K results were simply average against the P310 and WD Black SN7100.
Advertisement
The 120GB file transfer took 40.3 seconds, which is in the ballpark against its rivals, thanks to an average transfer rate of 2.98GB/s. In addition, the Final Fantasy XIV Endwalker benchmark spat out a load time of 8.48 seconds. This is, again, an adequate result, although competing drives can be up to a second faster in my testing.
This Samsung drive falls down in the PCMark 10 Data Drive and Quick System Drive tests, with results more in line with other value drive efforts, such as the WD Blue SN580. It’s lower than a lot of other value PCIe 4.0 drives I’ve tested, which is a shame.
Advertisement
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208689
Should you buy it?
You want an adequate PCIe 4.0 SSD
There isn’t necessarily anything wrong with the 990, as its performance is decent for a more affordable PCIe 4.0 SSD.
Advertisement
You want a more affordable choice
Advertisement
The problem with this drive is its severely high price for the specs and performance on offer – it’s possible to get stronger results for less from a range of rivals.
Final Thoughts
The Samsung 990 is a solid PCIe 4.0 SSD with middle-of-the-pack sequential and random performance that’s decently brisk, alongside sensible capacity options and decent durability. For a more value-oriented drive, though, its retail pricing is some of the most baffling I’ve seen.
Advertisement
The WD Black SN7100 and the Crucial P310 outperform this drive in top-end speed, most random tasks and game load times and are more affordable than the 990, while Samsung’s own 990 Pro is faster and more feature-rich from resellers, in spite of being slightly older. It puts the 990 in a bit of a difficult position – there isn’t necessarily anything wrong with it, with cromulent performance for most folks, but its high price leaves a bit of a sting. For more options, check out our list of the best SSDs we’ve tested.
How We Test
Each SSD we test utilises a mix of both synthetic and real-world benchmark tests. On top of that, we also use a number of price-to-performance metrics, and monitor temperature and power-draw to determine the long-term stability and cost-effectiveness of the drive.
Each SSD is tested in a bespoke test PC across a number of different scenarios
SSD temperatures and power draw are monitored throughout the process
Advertisement
FAQs
Can I use the Samsung 990 in my PC?
Yes, as long as you’ve got an M.2 slot it will work in any PC.
The manufacturer’s meteoric rise is likely a result of the increased global demand for memory chips.
ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), a Chinese manufacturer of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips, has replaced WeChat creator Tencent as the globe’s most valuable Chinese company.
According to Bloomberg, as of Thursday (13 August), CXMT has a market capitalisation of $524bn, compared to Tencent’s valuation of $510bn. Established in 2016 in Hefei, CXMT creates the DRAM chips needed to power mobile phones, PCs, tablets, servers, and a range of consumer products and applications.
Commenting on the announcement, Gary Tan, a portfolio manager at Allspring Global, told Bloomberg, “CXMT exceeding Tencent is a message from the market – chips are the new clicks. Our sense is the gap between the two will widen as agentic AI takes an increasing share of internet flows.”
Advertisement
CXMT’s overtaking of rival Tencent comes at a time when there is a major global push by organisations to invest in the development of chips, alongside increased interest in tech and resource sovereignty.
Reportedly, the chip manufacturer is representative of the direction many Chinese organisations are leaning towards in regards to AI and semiconductor targets. Shares are currently up a further 8pc following CXMT’s initial 467pc surge in debut figures.
Globally, organisations are seeking to mitigate the chips shortage, outpace their rivals and secure a more reliable supply chain in order to advance their products, tools and technologies.
This month, AI giant Anthropic confirmed plans to design its own chips in response to the worldwide shortage and increased pressures to develop faster, more advanced AI systems.
Advertisement
In July, semiconductor and infrastructure manufacturer Broadcom extended the partnership it holds with Apple, in a deal that will see both organisations collaborate on custom-made chips until 2031. Apple is also currently working on AI server chips.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
The Trump administration is recruiting private security firms to conduct federal government-authorized operations, including cyberattacks, against overseas-based criminal organizations that commit hacks on US persons, organizations, or government entities.
In a National Security Presidential Memorandum issued Thursday, US President Donald Trump directed the National Coordination Center (NCC), which operates under the Homeland Security Task Force, to develop a program for conducting specific cyber operations that combat foreign transnational criminal organizations (TCOs). The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security will provide oversight. The lynchpin of that program is bringing in private sector companies to participate.
Devil will be in the still-undefined details
A fact sheet that accompanied Thursday’s memo listed ransomware, sextortion schemes, phishing campaigns, financial fraud, and impersonation scams as activities eligible for private-sector security firms to target. The memo said such firms could “conduct Cyber Surveillance Operations and Cyber Effects Operations” against “cyber-enabled” TCOs. Such groups are defined as “any foreign group that conducts cyber-enabled crime against the United States Government, a United States person, or United States interests, and that is not an institutional part of a foreign government or wholly operated under a foreign government’s direction.”
The new program is the first time the federal government will authorize private companies to conduct offensive cyber operations against overseas hackers. The memo appears to permit companies participating in the program to use spyware or launch offensive attacks intended to destroy TCO data or systems. The memo doesn’t rule out certain types of offensive attacks, such as those that use encryption to lock targets out of their networks or performing distributed denial-of-service attacks. Up until now, the government has prohibited the private sector from taking such actions without court-authorized approval.
Google has launched Gemini 3.7 Flash, and one of its biggest upgrades is going straight to Gemini Spark.
The company says Spark is moving to the new model starting today, giving its cloud-based agent better tool use and stronger performance on multi-step tasks. Google specifically points to work such as consolidating files, drafting emails, and updating status documents across Google Workspace.
Spark could get a lot better at doing things for you
Gemini Spark can already continue working after a laptop is closed or a phone is locked, and it can operate across services such as Gmail, Drive, Docs, Calendar, Keep, and Tasks.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is supposed to make those workflows more reliable. Google says the model spends more effort on planning and tool calls, adapts better when it runs into roadblocks, and should need fewer retries and less manual intervention.
Google
The benchmark results point in the same direction. Gemini 3.7 Flash scored 30.4% on AutomationBench, up from 17% for Gemini 3.6 Flash. It also came in ahead of GPT-5.6 Terra at 23.6% and Claude Sonnet 5 at 10.7%.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is stronger beyond Spark too
Google also posted a sizable jump on document-heavy work. Gemini 3.7 Flash scored 34% on GDP.pdf, compared to 22% for Gemini 3.6 Flash, 28% for Claude Sonnet 5, and 24.7% for GPT-5.6 Terra.
Google
The pricing is what makes those gains more interesting. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens under introductory pricing through December 31. It is significantly cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 at $2 and $10, and GPT-5.6 Terra at $2 and $12.
GoogleGoogle
The model also posted improvements on coding-focused benchmarks. Gemini 3.7 Flash scored 43.6% on FrontierCode, edging out Claude Sonnet 5 at 42.7% and GPT-5.6 Terra at 41.3%, while also improving over Gemini 3.6 Flash on DeepSWE.
For Spark, Gemini 3.7 Flash looks like a meaningful upgrade, especially if the improvements in tool use and multi-step planning translate into fewer failed tasks and less manual intervention. Power users, however, are still waiting for Google’s more ambitious Gemini 3.5 Pro model, which was previewed at Google I/O in May but has yet to ship after missing its expected June rollout.
OpenAI’s leaders are rallying workers to respond to one of the largest crises in the company’s history—which spans across its AI safety, cybersecurity, and alignment divisions. The ChatGPT-maker says it has slowed down research, spent millions of dollars, and told several teams to drop everything to focus on investigating a set of rogue AI agents that breached the platform Hugging Face in a quest to complete an internal security test.
OpenAI is expected to release a comprehensive postmortem detailing the incident in the coming days. However, the Hugging Face incident has inspired OpenAI leaders and employees to examine how the AI lab’s culture may have enabled this incident in the first place.
Multiple current and former OpenAI employees, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private internal matters, tell WIRED they believe competitive pressures to quickly ship new AI models and products have made it difficult for staffers to sufficiently prioritize safety, security, and alignment.
“We’re reaching new levels of model capability that require more robust training, alignment, safety and security testing, deployment practices, and governance—as demonstrated by the work we’re doing to prepare Astra and future models,” said OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman in a statement to WIRED. “We feel the weight of deploying our models and products responsibly, and a lot of that starts with the changes we’ve made to more deeply integrate research, safety, and security into frontier-model development from the start.”
Advertisement
This is far from the first time OpenAI employees have raised such concerns. Back in 2024, OpenAI’s then head of alignment Jan Leike left to join Anthropic, warning on his way that safety was taking a back seat to shiny products. Two years later, the Hugging Face attack represents a watershed moment for the AI industry, demonstrating that AI agents today can cause real-world harm when safety, security, and alignment aren’t properly accounted for.
“We are responding to this with the utmost severity,” said Michael Dalton, an OpenAI security and infrastructure engineer, during a talk at the Black Hat cybersecurity conference last week. “What I would internalize is that AI-orchestrated, fully automated offensive attacks are real now. The actions we have discussed today were an unintended side effect of running evaluations on frontier AI.”
Some OpenAI employees told WIRED they are optimistic this incident will inspire genuine change within the company. OpenAI has committed to slowing the release of future AI models and has been especially forthcoming about areas where its mitigations fell short. Boaz Barak, a researcher who coleads OpenAI’s safety advisory group, said in a post on X that addressing the situation “requires not just fixing some issues but also changing our culture.”
In their Black Hat talk, OpenAI security engineers Dalton and Eric Wallace said that the Hugging Face incident started in May when, unbeknownst to the company, several AI agents thought to be operating within isolated testing environments gained access to the internet and convened on a covert message board to coordinate with one another.
Advertisement
OpenAI would not discover the message board until July, when it learned that the AI agents had hacked into multiple services to try to achieve their larger goal of breaching Hugging Face’s platform, which they believed may contain answers to the security tests they were trying to solve.
“They were incredibly sloppy. If you’re serious about this, your AI shouldn’t be able to break out onto the internet and then do it again right afterward,” says one former OpenAI employee who requested anonymity to speak with WIRED. “This was the biggest safety incident in OpenAI’s history.”
The New Guard
Weeks before OpenAI discovered the Hugging Face incident, WIRED reported that the company had begun a reorganization to combine its safety and core research teams, which led to the departure of its then safety leader Johannes Heidecke.
Sandhini Agarwal, who led AI safety teams at OpenAI, also left the company in July after more than six years, according to her LinkedIn. Agarwal did not immediately respond to WIRED’s request for comment.
Singer and actress Selena Gomez and her mother are being sued over their mental health startup, Wondermind. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit say they invested nearly $1.2 million in the startup, and are accusing Gomez of securities fraud and breach of contract.
They allege that the startup failed to deliver on its commitments without informing investors, and Gomez failed to market the startup after promising to do so. The news was first reported by Forbes.
Wondermind launched in 2021 and aimed to offer daily mental health resources to users. The lawsuit alleges that investors were unaware of the company’s troubles until a September 2025 story from The Cut uncovered them.
“Gomez purported to sign a contract obligating her to perform and then ignored it,” the complaint reads. “The partnerships did not exist. The initiatives never materialized. The app was never built. And for three years, while the Company quietly collapsed around them, not one of its founders, officers, or directors said a word to the investors whose money was funding the collapse.”
Advertisement
The investors allege that Gomez and Wondermind misrepresented the company’s finances and overstated the extent of Gomez’s involvement. The plaintiffs are seeking to recover their investments and legal fees.
Wondermind did not respond to our request for comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login