Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Proton’s Privacy-Focused Lumo Chatbot Gets Image Generation

Published

on

Lumo 2.0 can also search for relevant background information.

Proton has rolled out its biggest update yet for the Lumo chatbot, almost a year after it launched. Lumo version 2.0 now comes with image recognition and generation, finally making it a legitimate competitor to ChatGPT and Gemini. Proton says the updated chatbot has the capability to generate images, as well as to analyze and edit them. Conversations involving images are still protected by zero-access encryption like all chats on Lumo, which means they can only be accessed on your device. The company says they can’t be accessed by third-parties or even Proton itself.  

In addition to image generation, the new Lumo also has a thinking mode for reasoning. Proton says Lumo 2.0 Lite scored 127 percent higher than Lumo 1.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index benchmark, while Lumo 2.0 Max scored 240 percent higher. The benchmark measures a model’s capabilities across multiple tasks. The updated Lumo has deeper context, giving it the capability to dig deeper for relevant background information and provide you with more accurate responses. Plus, it can now surface the latest information and source citations in its responses.  

Lumo 2.0 is now available for use. Its core AI capabilities remain free, but you’ll have to pay $10 a month for Lumo Plus for unlimited chats, advanced image generation and access to Proton’s more advanced models. 

Advertisement

“Lumo 2.0 has been re-engineered from the ground up and the introduction of thinking mode gives it powerful new capabilities,” said Proton founder and CEO Andy Yen. “User testing demonstrates that the gap has closed to the point that for many use cases, users can no longer perceive a qualitative difference between Lumo 2.0 Max and the latest models from OpenAI and Anthrophic. Lumo 2.0 demonstrates that users no longer need to choose between powerful AI capabilities and meaningful privacy protections.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Stihl FSA 50 Cordless Grass Trimmer Review

Published

on

Verdict

Perfectly balanced, powerful, and incredibly quiet, the Stihl FSA 50 Cordless Grass Trimmer is a must for any serious home gardener. It’s an expensive piece of kit, but it’s worth the money for its performance and handling.

  • Converts to an edging tool in seconds

  • Excellent balance and minimal vibrations

  • Quiet operation

  • Some might struggle with the safety trigger

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £159

  • 28cm cutting width

    Advertisement

    Ideal for clearing growth quickly.

  • Adjustable length

    Advertisement

    Change the shaft length to suit your height.

  • Battery powered

    Advertisement

    Runs on Stihl’s AK battery system.

Introduction

If you’re in the habit of gardening early in the morning or late at night, this ultra-quiet grass trimmer will keep you in your neighbour’s good books. Powerful, comfortable, and highly versatile, I think the Stihl FSA 50 Cordless Grass Trimmer is one of the best cordless grass trimmers available right now.

Find out why in my in-depth review.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Design and Features

  • Adjustable shaft length
  • Adjustable cutting head angle
  • Converts to an edge trimmer

First off, this is an incredibly well-made grass trimmer. The steel shaft trigger, blade guard and handle feel premium, and there’s no wobble or rattling during use.

Stihl FSA 50 cordless grass trimmer handle and battery compartmentStihl FSA 50 cordless grass trimmer handle and battery compartment
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Weighing just over 4kg when combined with the AK20 battery, I thought this cordless grass trimmer would feel heavy. Thanks to Stihl’s excellent ergonomics and balance, it doesn’t feel weighty at all. The shaft length can be adjusted by about 20cm to suit gardeners of different heights, and the front loop handle can be adjusted to a comfortable position and locked in place.

A collar halfway along the shaft lets you rotate the cutting head, converting the trimmer to a powerful edging tool in seconds. The cutting head uses bump feed, too, paying out fresh line whenever you tap it on the lawn. In my opinion, bump feed beats auto feed because it’s more economical and has fewer moving parts that can go wrong.

Stihl FSA 50 cordless grass trimmer length and angle adjustment collarStihl FSA 50 cordless grass trimmer length and angle adjustment collar
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Down at the business end of the grass trimmer, there’s plenty of adjustment available too. The cutting head angles to stay running flat on the lawn, regardless of your height. Flick the switch round to the “E” setting and the head drops straight down for edging the lawn instead. And another clever bit of thinking from Stihl, you can adjust it with your foot and not have to bend over. Notably, a cordless grass trimmer like this offers more convenience for different lawn jobs.

Stihl FSA 50 head angle adjustment leverStihl FSA 50 head angle adjustment lever
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Running on the powerful AK system, the battery slots into the back of the trimmer and helps to keep things balanced and comfortable. And the 28cm cut width is wide enough for clearing decent swathes through long grass.

It all adds up to a supremely comfortable grass trimmer. The only place that might cause issues is when you want to stow it away. Although the shaft length is adjustable, it doesn’t fold or break down into two pieces. So, if you have limited storage a smaller grass trimmer would be a better option.

Advertisement

Performance

  • Minimal vibration even at top speed
  • Extremely quiet
  • Effective variable speed trigger

Assembling the FSA 50 for its first use took me about five minutes. The loop handle bolts on and tightens in place by hand, but you’ll need a cross head screwdriver to attach the blade guard. The flower guard snaps into place without much fuss, but I had to be careful to avoid scratching the plastic.

Advertisement

Stihl FSA 50 battery grass trimmer full length on the grassStihl FSA 50 battery grass trimmer full length on the grass
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It’s great to see that Stihl includes a pair of safety glasses in the box, and they’re big enough to go on over top of most glasses as well. Safety is always a priority when using a grass trimmer, so it’s a welcome addition to the FSA 50.

The lack of noise that this trimmer makes is impressive. If you really want to avoid annoying the neighbours, trimming on the lowest speed is almost silent. And controlling the speed is easy too, thanks to the sensitive trigger. I found it easy to keep it at a low enough speed to conserve battery life but kick it up to full speed when necessary. Additionally, the cordless grass trimmer design helps keep noise levels down for quiet operation.

The two stage safety trigger might not be to everyone’s tastes, however. To turn on the trimmer, you need to engage the rear and side safety switches before the variable speed trigger works. It’s an effective safety feature but a little fiddly to get used to.

The lack of vibration is another welcome feature. Even at full speed, the FSA 50 didn’t push much vibration into my hands. It’s definitely an easy trimmer to use, even for long periods.

Advertisement

I used an AK20 battery in the trimmer, which is rated to power the trimmer for up to 50 minutes. The smaller AK10 will give you 25 minutes of trimming, and the big AK30 battery provides an hour of use.

Advertisement

While the trimmer comes with a line trimmer head and 1.6 mm round line, you can swap it out for the Polycut 3-2 mowing head with plastic blades to double your working time. That’s good to know if you have lots of brush to clear.  

However, if you have a bigger garden to look after you might want to take a look at the FSA 50’s big brother, the mighty Stihl FSA 70R instead.

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

You want power and flexibility

Ergonomically brilliant, this trimmer is comfortable and easy to use, working as well as an edge trimmer as in regular use.

Advertisement

You want something smaller and lighter

If you’ve got a smaller garden, a smaller, easier-to-store trimmer might make more sense.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

I’m struggling to find the downsides of this grass trimmer. It works just as well as an edging tool, it’s quiet, comfortable, and easy to use for extended periods of time. So, although it’s expensive even without batteries, this is the ultimate multi-purpose trimmer. If you need something smaller (or larger), read the guide to the best grass trimmers.

How We Test

We test every grass trimmer we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Advertisement

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

  • Used as our main trimmer for the review period
  • Used on a variety of grass lengths and weeds to see how well the mower cuts
  • Tested to see how easy the trimmer is to carry, use and store

Advertisement

FAQs

What type of battery does the Stihl FSA 50 use?

This trimmer uses Stihl’s AK series of batteries, which are compatible with a wide range of garden tools.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  Stihl FSA 50 Cordless Grass Trimmer Review
Manufacturer
Size (Dimensions) 148 CM
Weight 2.9 KG
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 30/06/2026
Model Number Stihl FSA 50
Cutting width 28 cm
Strimmer type Cordless
Adjustable length
Cutting tool 1.6mm line, optional Polycut head
Rotating head Yes

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Remembering How Microsoft’s Fake Windows Error Ended In a $280 Million Secret Settlement

Published

on

Slashdot reader joshuark summarizes this walk down memory lane from the tech site MakeUseOf:
Facing real competition from Digital Research’s DR DOS, Microsoft secretly embedded a sabotaging mechanism known as “AARD code” into beta versions of Windows 3.1 to prevent it from running on Digital Research’s competing DR DOS operating system.
This code triggered fake, alarming error messages to convince developers that DR DOS was unstable… Although Microsoft disabled the feature in the final retail release, the California-based firm Caldera, Inc., which had acquired DR DOS assets, sued Microsoft for anti-competitive practices.
Microsoft settled the lawsuit out of court in 2000 for $280 million, a figure that remained sealed until it was unsealed in 2009.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How Airspeed Sensors Work | Hackaday

Published

on

When you’re driving your car, you’re probably regularly looking at the speedometer to make sure you comply with the local speed limits. The method by which it works is simple enough: the rotation of the wheels is sent mechanically via a cable to a dial on the dash, or an electronic sensor counts the rotations of the drivetrain and an electronically-controlled needle or display shows the speed.

But what about if you were in an aircraft, and the wheels had nothing to do with how fast you were going? How would you even begin to measure speed? There are two ways: there’s a convenient solution to this problem rooted in simple fluid mechanics, and a far-more-complex modern solution. Today, we’ll explore how planes and helicopters are able to figure out how fast they’re going, by the old ways and the new.

Classical Methods

Measuring airspeed can be achieved by measuring stagnation pressure with a pitot tube, and comparing this to static pressure. This can be done at different points on the aircraft, or a pitot-static tube can be used, which measures both stagnation pressure and static pressure in a single probe. Credit: Chaos386, CC BY-SA 3.0

A key thing most aviators want to know is how fast their aircraft is going. Specifically, it’s nice to know how fast it’s moving relative to the airstream around it, which is referred to as airspeed. This is important, because it’s the aircraft’s velocity relative to the flow, such as wind, that determines the performance of the airfoils, how much lift is generated, and whether or not the aircraft is approaching a stall condition where it might fall out of the sky.

Bernoulli’s equation, rearranged to find airspeed (u), by subtracting static pressure from stagnation pressure, multiplying it by 2, dividing by fluid density, and taking the square root of that result.

Measuring airspeed is most commonly achieved with the use of a device called a Pitot tube. The pitot tube is a tube with a hole in one end that points directly into the airflow in the direction of travel of the aircraft.

As air flows in, it reaches a dead end and the flow slows to a stop, or stagnates, since it has nowhere to go. This allows a pressure sensor or a manometer or other device to measure the stagnation pressure at this point. The stagnation pressure measurement is related to the flowspeed of the incoming air since the kinetic energy of the flow is converted to pressure as the flow comes to a halt.

A secondary tube, pointing perpendicular to the airflow, is then used to measure the static pressure of the surrounding air, without the ram effect of the air being forced in by the aircraft’s forward motion. Then, it’s possible to calculate the velocity of the aircraft relative to the airstream by plugging the stagnation pressure and static pressure into a rearranged Bernoulli’s equation.  If the pitot tube and static tube are hooked up to electronic sensors, the airspeed can be calculated electronically, and fed to a display or digital gauge.

Advertisement
A classic airspeed indicator has the pitot tube and static tube feeding right into the gauge in the cockpit. The pressure differential causes the diaphragm to expand as the airspeed increases, which mvoes a mechanism causing the needle to move on the gauge. Credit: FAA, public domain

Alternatively, it’s possible to effectively do this “calculation” mechanically. In earlier days, static and stagnation pressure captured by each tube would be fed to a gauge. Inside, the stagnation pressure would be fed to a diaphragm which moved due to the difference relative to the static pressure which is fed into the gauge body, and the movement of the diaphragm would, via a simple mechanism, shift the needle on the gauge.

A small General Aviation aircraft might mount a single pitot tube on the aircraft, feeding the air speed instrument in the cockpit. Commercial aircraft might mount two or more for safety’s sake, in case one becomes inoperable, while large airliners may have four or even more to provide a high level of redundancy and error checking. Heaters are commonly included on pitot tubes to ensure they can be kept free of ice, which can otherwise completely block a tube and make it impossible to obtain an airspeed reading.

Pitot tubes sticking out in the airstream underneath a Boeing 777-381. Credit: Cassiopeia sweet, public domain

For pilots, not knowing how fast (or slow) the aircraft is going can be highly dangerous, as it can lead to entering unstable flight regimes such as stall. Thus, it’s imperative that the pitot tubes remain unobstructed and functional for safe flight. Many aircraft accidents have occurred because of blocked or malfunctioning pitot tubes or airspeed instruments.

The New Way

Of course, you could fuss about with pitot tubes and pressure sensors and deicing measures, but that’s all very fiddly and old hat. There is an entirely different way to figure out a plane’s speed, though it’s only been available for the last few decades. It’s as simple as throwing a GNSS receiver on the aircraft.

Yes, whether your particular poison is GPS, Baidou, GLONASS, or Galileo, any major satellite navigation system will be able to tell you the speed of your receiver. Simply measuring the change in the receiver’s position over time is enough to calculate out the speed, and any off-the-shelf receiver will present this information as standard. It’s generally not used as a primary indicator in aircraft, because it reports ground speed, not airspeed, the latter being more relevant for aviation purposes. Still, it can prove to be a useful sense check when traditional airspeed indicators are non-operative or reporting confusing data, and GNSS devices are widely used on many aircraft today.

Flying High

Many modern aircraft have so-called “glass cockpit” displays that include feeds from GNSS receivers, which can provide supplementary data such as satellite-based ground speed measurements. However, these readings are generally not used for the primary task of flying the aircraft. Credit: Bluedisk, CC BY-SA 3.0

If you’ve ever wondered how an aircraft measures its speed as it floats through the amorphous gas cloud we call an atmosphere, now you know. Even to this day, where electronics and computer wizardry control our fanciest aircraft, airspeed measurements are still done with the same simple physics, just with some fancier sensors for help. The fundamentals haven’t changed at all. Now you know, you can always dig deeper into the many other rich applications of Bernoulli’s equation and fluid mechanics in general. Happy learning.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Meta limits Claude Code and Codex over copying fears

Published

on

Meta wants its own AI coding tools. To get there, it is telling its engineers to be careful with the rival tools they lean on today.

Meta has placed strict limits on how engineers in its applied AI division use Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex, The Information reported. The worry is inadvertent distillation. One internal memo even told some teams to pause tasks that used the outside tools. It warned that the rivals’ output could seep into Meta’s training data and trigger “serious escalations with partner companies”.

What distillation means here

Distillation is when one model learns from another model’s outputs. A company feeds a strong model’s answers into its own system, and the smaller model picks up the bigger one’s skills. The method is cheap, fast, and legally fraught.

That is the heart of Meta’s problem. The company is building its own coding tool, called MetaCode, to replace Claude Code and Codex. If its engineers rely on those rival tools while shaping the replacement, Meta could end up training on a competitor’s model by accident. That could breach the rivals’ terms of service and hand them a lawsuit.

Advertisement

The bind Meta is in

The situation is awkward. Meta still needs the best coding tools to move fast. For now, the best ones belong to Anthropic and OpenAI. So Meta is asking staff to keep using the very products it wants to leave behind, only with more caution. The rules sit inside its new applied AI engineering division, the unit Meta built to catch up in the model race.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Cost is the other half of the story. Meta is trying to wean itself off expensive outside coding tools. It is not alone. Amazon is weighing cheaper alternatives after Anthropic raised its prices. The pressure to cut the AI bill is everywhere.

Advertisement

Anthropic keeps gaining leverage

This is the latest sign of Anthropic’s growing clout. Its Claude models have become a default for coders, which gives the company room to push. It recently struck a half-price deal to put Claude across California’s state agencies. It is also winning paying customers at pace.

The flip side is friction with the very firms that depend on it. Anthropic has already accused Alibaba of distilling Claude into a rival model. Meta clearly does not want to be next in line.

Squeezed on every side

Meta’s pinch is not only about Anthropic and OpenAI. Google has capped how much Meta can use its Gemini models for coding and chatbots, Engadget reported, citing a lack of capacity. So Meta faces limits from three rivals at once. It must build its own tools, and fast.

That is a strange place for a company of Meta’s size. It spends billions on AI talent and chips. Yet on coding tools, it still depends on the labs it is racing against. The new rules try to close that gap without tripping a legal wire.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The episode shows how the AI business is maturing. The model makers are no longer just selling access. They are guarding their outputs as prized training data, and they are watching who learns from them.

For Meta, the lesson is sharp. Owning the frontier means more than raw compute and big hires. It means controlling the tools your own engineers use every day. Until Meta’s in-house coding system is ready, it has to borrow from rivals while trying not to copy them. That is a tightrope, and the memos show Meta knows it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

You Might Be Paying More For YouTube Premium If You Subscribed Through Apple

Published

on

Don’t get hit with the Apple tax.

Apple’s App Store is quietly a major source of the company’s revenue. Every time an iPhone user subscribes to a service through Apple’s billing platform, the Cupertino giant skims up to 30 percent off the top of each recurring charge. The practice has been so brazen that a court ruled Apple must allow third-party billing to be offered, then, last year, the same court found the company in contempt for violating that ruling when it charged developers a comparable fee to implement their own billing tools.

But app developers had already adjusted to Apple’s fee skimming long before the court case was decided. Rather than eat a 15-30 percent loss on subscription revenues, many developers simply offset those costs by charging customers more when they subscribe through the App Store. A service that might be $10 when you subscribe on the company’s website becomes $13 when you subscribe on the App Store. It’s a phenomenon that’s become known as the “Apple tax.”

YouTube Premium is a prime example. We’ve noted that some users can swap existing music subscriptions for YouTube Premium, but it’s a different story when subscribing through the App Store. Indeed, when we look at pricing for YouTube Premium, we can see Google charging an Apple Tax. When subscribed to through the YouTube website, the monthly subscription cost for an individual is $16. However, head to the App Store, and the price tag increases to $21 a month. That’s $5 leaving your wallet each month for no reason other than helping Google to cover Apple’s tolls, making it much harder to get your money’s worth from YouTube Premium.

Advertisement

Apple’s App Store is convenient for managing subscriptions, but it’s not worth paying extra for YouTube Premium

Some people prefer to bill their subscriptions through Apple’s App Store because of how predatory first-party billing can be. Once you give some companies your credit card information, it can be nearly impossible to get them out of your pocket. After digging around in settings menus to find the “cancel subscription” button, which appears deliberately hidden like Waldo, you’re made to go through three confirmation screens, presented with a special, one-time-only discount offer, and then made to fill out a survey explaining why you want to cancel. And that’s if you’re lucky. Some subscriptions from smaller outfits will make you send an email, or you might resort to replacing your credit card in order to stop the subscription from being charged.

There may be situations where paying an Apple tax on your subscriptions is worth a few extra dollars for the peace of mind that comes with the ability to cancel them in just a few taps on your smartphone. Apple would love to keep collecting its fees from your subscription, but the company also wants you to enjoy using your iPhone and is therefore not as straightforwardly incentivized to act like a gremlin with your credit card.

Even so, it’s worth saving money where you can. Thankfully, YouTube Premium makes it reasonably easy to cut off a subscription on its own billing platform. Canceling is a relatively straightforward process, and Google won’t give you much guff about your decision to stop giving it money. If you’re currently overpaying for YouTube Premium through the App Store, or if you’ve been considering signing up for the service, you’re better off doing so away from the tax collector at Apple’s walled garden gates.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

A hollow-core fiber cable just carried 51.3 Tb/s across 200 km

Published

on


Conducted jointly with China Telecom and optical equipment maker Dekoli, the test ran on the world’s longest cross-border commercial HCF cable. The result sets a new world record achieved without the signal boosters that long-haul fiber links typically depend on.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Shark’s New Transformer Vacuum Breaks Down Into Three Different Vacuums

Published

on

I love cordless vacuums, and I don’t just say that because I’m one of CNET’s primary testers of the category. I say it because switching from corded vacuums to cordless vacuums was a big quality-of-life upgrade, thanks to the ease of use and maneuverability around my apartment. The downside is that cordless vacuums don’t usually match the suction power and cleaning capabilities of upright or canister models. 

Shark’s PowerDetect Transformer 3-in-1 is the company’s attempt to address this trade-off without forcing you to buy multiple vacuums.

“The upright vacuum has looked and worked the same way for decades,” said Petra Oman, vice president of marketing at SharkNinja, in a press statement. “We saw an opportunity to rethink the category by eliminating the bulky hose and creating a system that adapts to the way people actually clean. Transformer delivers the deep-cleaning performance consumers expect from an upright, with the flexibility and reach needed to clean everything from floors and carpets to stairs, furniture, ceilings and the car.”

Advertisement
Transformer 3-in-1 cleaning under couch

The main upright dustbin is detachable when you want to use it as a slimmer cordless vac. 

Shark

As the name suggests, the PowerDetect Transformer is three vacuums in one. It’s a full-size upright vacuum that’s intended for deep cleaning carpets and hardwood floors with the strongest suction. Shark says you can remove the main canister with one click, and it’ll turn into a slim stick vacuum for regular, lightweight cleaning, getting under furniture and into other tight spots. One more click turns it into a handheld vacuum, making it easier to clean stairs, upholstery, corners and cars. 

In terms of specs, the Transformer will have key features from Shark’s most popular models, including LED lighting to help you find debris and automatic detection of dirt levels, flooring types, edges and movement to automatically adjust suction and cleaning performance. It features anti-tangle brushrolls, odor-neutralizing tech like the Shark Stratos and HEPA filtration. It’ll also come with an auto-emptying system that empties the debris into the main dustbin when the handheld clicks back into place. 

Advertisement

I haven’t had a chance to go hands-on with this vacuum yet, and I’m not entirely sure how the system breaks down. I’ll be testing it both at home and at CNET’s Louisville lab. The most interesting question will be whether the PowerDetect Transformer can truly deliver the cleaning performance of an upright vacuum without compromising elsewhere. 

Shark Transformer cleaning across flooring types

The Transformer has all the key features we’ve liked from the most popular Shark models.

Shark

Price and availability 

The Shark PowerDetect Transformer 3-in-1 will be available on SharkNinja and TikTok Shop for $529. It’ll also come to Amazon, Walmart, Best Buy, Target, Costco and Sam’s Club. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Dbrand cancels Portal-inspired Steam Machine Companion Cube case after Valve legal threat, refunds buyers

Published

on


Dbrand admitted in a post that it never asked for a license from Valve to make the Companion Cube, a decision it expects to regret for a long time.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

PlayStation 6 bill of materials nears $1,000 as RAM shortages worsen

Published

on


Prominent leaker KeplerL2 recently claimed that the cost of manufacturing Sony’s upcoming PlayStation 6 console has increased considerably in recent months. Due to memory shortages, upcoming game consoles could cost twice as much as their predecessors did at launch.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Panasonic to localise US data-centre battery production, CEO says

Published

on

The Japanese group plans to mass-produce data-centre battery cells in Kansas by fiscal 2028, redirecting a large slice of its AI infrastructure investment toward storage.

The companies that built batteries for electric cars are discovering a new and hungrier customer: the data centre.

Panasonic plans to localise production of data-centre battery cells in the United States, its energy unit’s chief executive has said, building the cells at a plant in Kansas rather than shipping them in, as the Japanese group chases a market that barely existed a few years ago.

Mass production at the Kansas site is scheduled for the financial year ending March 2029, which Panasonic counts as fiscal 2028.

Advertisement

The plant gives the company a domestic base to supply American data-centre operators directly, a meaningful advantage at a moment when tariffs, supply-chain anxiety, and the sheer speed of AI build-out have made onshore manufacturing a competitive asset rather than a cost to be minimised.

Advertisement

The money behind the move is substantial. Panasonic is directing about 350 billion yen, roughly $2.18 billion, of a previously announced 500 billion yen AI infrastructure investment over fiscal 2026 to 2028 to its Energy unit, the division that also supplies Tesla, with the remaining 150 billion yen going to its Industry segment.

The split tells you where the company thinks the growth is: the battery business that grew up around electric vehicles is being retooled to feed the server hall.

The ambition is sized accordingly. Panasonic Energy chief executive Kazuo Tadanobu described the unit’s 950 billion yen sales target for data-centre-related energy storage in fiscal 2028 as a “minimum commitment,” with the business aiming to push sales past 1 trillion yen.

For a target to be framed as a floor rather than a goal is a sign of how quickly the company expects demand to climb.

Advertisement

The logic is grounded in how modern data centres actually run. The facilities training and serving AI models draw enormous, spiky loads, and they cannot tolerate even a flicker of interruption, which makes large-scale battery storage essential for smoothing supply, bridging outages, and managing the gap between what the grid can deliver and what the racks demand at any given instant. As AI compute scales, the storage attached to it scales with it.

The cells these facilities need are also a different specification from the ones that go into cars, tuned for grid-style duty cycles rather than the range and weight constraints of a vehicle, which is part of why an established battery maker still has to build dedicated capacity rather than simply repurpose its existing lines.

That demand is already straining the systems around it. The build-out has pushed electricity grids to their limits, with operators from Denmark pausing new connections to China wrestling with how to match clean power to data-centre load, a backdrop that makes on-site storage less of a luxury than a requirement.

Batteries are becoming part of the basic plumbing of AI, not an optional extra bolted on at the end.

Advertisement

Panasonic is not moving into an empty field. Chinese battery giants including CATL are racing into the same data-centre storage market, and the competition runs alongside the broader contest over the silicon inside those facilities, where Chinese firms are pushing domestic alternatives to Nvidia at speed.

The energy layer of the AI stack is becoming as contested as the compute layer.

The US plant is one node in a wider network. Panasonic Energy also plans a third plant in Mexico, with mass production likewise targeted for fiscal 2028, giving it North American capacity on both sides of the border.

The company has not detailed the Kansas site’s output volumes or named the data-centre customers it expects to supply, leaving the commercial specifics to emerge as production approaches.

Advertisement

What is clear is the direction: a battery maker that bet its future on cars is now placing a second bet, on the machines learning to think.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025