Samsung’s latest Weather update puts the focus where it matters right now, pollen. With allergy season ramping up, the app now shows what’s actually in the air so you can react before symptoms hit.
Version 1.7.30.8 changes how that data appears. Instead of a generic icon, you now get separate categories for tree, grass, and ragweed, making it easier to read conditions without digging deeper.
If you deal with seasonal allergies, the type of trigger matters as much as the intensity, and now that detail sits front and center.
Samsung also reworks how severity shows up, replacing a color scale with text labels. It’s simpler to read at a glance, though some users may find the loss of color cues less precise.
Advertisement
Clearer pollen info at a glance
The biggest shift is how the app presents daily readings. Instead of a single symbol, it splits conditions into tree, grass, and ragweed, giving you a clearer picture of what’s driving symptoms.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
That added detail helps with everyday decisions. Tree and grass pollen peak at different times, so seeing them broken out lets you plan ahead with more confidence. If ragweed is high but grass is low, you’ll know what’s likely to trigger a reaction.
More than just pollen changes
This version also brings a few smaller refinements across the app. Moon phase icons have been refreshed, giving nighttime forecasts a cleaner and more consistent look.
Radar gets a practical tweak as well, with new shortcuts that link out to more detailed forecasting tools. That gives you faster access when you want more than the basic overview.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
None of these changes overhaul the app, but together they make it feel more polished. Samsung is leaning into incremental improvements that add value without forcing you to relearn anything.
Who gets it and when
Version 1.7.30.8 is rolling out now, but availability is staggered. It’s currently tied to devices running One UI 8.5, so not everyone will see it right away.
Advertisement
Pollen tracking itself isn’t new. Earlier versions like One UI 8.0 still support it, just without the updated visuals, so you’re only missing the redesign if the update hasn’t reached you yet.
The rollout may take a few weeks to reach all devices through the Galaxy Store. If you rely on the app daily, it’s worth checking for updates soon, especially as allergy season picks up.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from VentureBeat: The whale has resurfaced. DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup offshoot of High-Flyer Capital Management quantitative analysis firm, became a near-overnight sensation globally in January 2025 with the release of its open source R1 model that matched proprietary U.S. giants. It’s been an epoch in AI since then, and while DeepSeek has released several updates to that model and its other V3 series, the international AI and business community has been largely waiting with baited breath for the follow-up to the R1 moment.
Now it’s arrived with last night’s release of DeepSeek-V4, a 1.6-trillion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model available free under commercially-friendly open source MIT License, which nears — and on some benchmarks, surpasses — the performance of the world’s most advanced closed-source systems at approximately 1/6th the cost over the application programming interface (API).
This release — which DeepSeek AI researcher Deli Chen described on X as a “labor of love” 484 days after the launch of V3 — is being hailed as the “second DeepSeek moment.” As Chen noted in his post, “AGI belongs to everyone”. It’s available now on AI code sharing community Hugging Face and through DeepSeek’s API. The new DeepSeek-V4-Pro model delivers “near-frontier performance” at a much lower price, costing $5.22 for 1 million input and 1 million output tokens compared with $35 for GPT-5.5 and $30 for Claude Opus 4.7. That makes it roughly 1/7th the cost of GPT-5.5 and 1/6th the cost of Claude Opus 4.7, reinforcing VentureBeat’s point that DeepSeek is “compressing advanced model economics into a much lower band.”
While GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 still lead on most benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro gets close enough that its lower cost could “force a major rethink of the economics of advanced AI deployment.”
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
Harbor Freight has several private-label brands, including Daytona — which is primarily a car jack brand — and Hercules, which offers premium-grade hardware that targets professionals. One of the best Harbor Freight brands is Bauer, which offers power tools, outdoor equipment, workshop gear, and similar products that are more prosumer-grade than more casual options.
Advertisement
Along with tools and equipment, Bauer also makes storage solutions to hold and protect this gear — or any other hardware you might own. These storage options come in different shapes, sizes, and functionalities, though they are all relatively inexpensive compared to similar products from heavy hitters like Milwaukee or DeWalt. The Bauer Small Modular Toolbox (model 201327M-B), for instance, costs $30, whereas DeWalt’s comparable Tstak Small Parts & Tool Storage Organizer (model DWST17808) is $33 on sale — with an actual list price that is $20 more than that.
While both have similar widths and lengths and essentially do the same thing, the two differ in several areas. These include load capacity and durability, which are tied to the cases’ construction. While price is definitely a factor in choosing one product over another, it isn’t everything, and the DeWalt’s advantage may influence your mental math when considering these two products.
Advertisement
DeWalt’s heavy-duty construction gives its toolbox an advantage over Bauer’s
Both the Bauer Small Modular Toolbox and DeWalt Tstak Small Parts & Tool Storage Organizer offer removable bins with lids that offer good organization. Bauer’s lid has six removable compartments, but DeWalt’s has seven inserts (although they’re not removable). Each also offers the full width of the case without the bins for larger tools. Comparing the two boxes, Bauer’s toolbox is slightly larger, with Harbor Freight listing the maximum storage space of its toolbox as 1,110 cubic inches. DeWalt says its organizer has a volume of 3.7 gallons, which equates to about 855 cubic inches.
However, DeWalt has Harbor Freight beat in load capacity. The working load of the Bauer Small Modular Toolbox is 25 pounds, whereas the DeWalt Tstak Small Parts & Tool Storage Organizer tops out at 66 pounds, meaning it can safely carry over 1.6x more weight. That’s a big difference and may be the biggest reason a user would choose DeWalt’s case over Harbor Freight’s cheaper option. Plus, Bauer’s toolbox is significantly heavier than DeWalt’s at 9.1 versus 5.57 pounds, which may be another factor in its favor.
Part of the reason DeWalt’s case can carry more weight but has less space than Bauer’s is its heavy-duty construction. The DeWalt box is made out of thermoplastic polypropylene and strong, rust-resistant metal latches that can bear heavier loads. It also has a large, top-mounted handle for better portability than the Bauer.
Advertisement
Compatibility with other storage options should also be considered
Both cases are part of their brand’s proprietary systems and only connect to other cases and accessories from the same system (at least, without adapters). This could sway you in one direction or another; if you own a DeWalt Tstak Rolling Toolbox or Tstak Stackable Utility Cart, the DeWalt Tstak Small Parts & Tool Storage Organizer might be worth the higher cost, since it’ll be compatible with the products you already have. The cheaper Bauer Small Modular Toolbox would need to be used separately from any DeWalt stack, though it works perfectly with Harbor Freight’s new and improved rolling toolbox.
Advertisement
It’s important to note that DeWalt currently has two separate modular storage systems: Tstak and ToughSystem. Without an adapter, DeWalt’s Tstak and ToughSystem 2.0 products are not compatible with one another. ToughSystem caters more to professionals who require storage that can withstand harsher jobsite environments. Tstak, on the other hand, is better suited for DIYers and more casual users. You can, of course, purchase whichever you prefer.
Compared to Bauer’s cheaper toolbox, Tstak’s is the more durable, heavy-duty option, which may justify its higher price tag for some. Those buyers will also be able to take advantage of DeWalt’s other Tstak products and build out a solid storage setup for their tools.
There are dozens of U.S. Air Force bases scattered across the U.S. Some are large and well-known, such as Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, which houses the Air Force’s most advanced air combat training facility. Others, however, fly under many people’s radar. For example, you may not have heard of Buckley Air Force Base in Aurora, Colorado, but the facility traces its roots back to World War II. Named for a World War I fighter pilot that was killed in combat, this base had an interesting history following the second World War. It was briefly an auxiliary field for Lowry Air Force Base before being converted to an Air National Guard Field, and then to a Navy Air Station. It was eventually transferred to the Air Force in 1959.
In 2004, Buckley became the host base for the 460th Space Wing and also hosted the Colorado Air National Guard. After the Space Wing was deactivated in 2020, Buckley became a unit of the new United States Space Force and renamed Buckley Space Force Base. Today, it hosts Space Base Delta 2, which provides support services for global missile warning and tracking. It also houses 117 tenant units, such as the Navy Reserve Center Denver and the Army National Guard Colorado. Overall, the base is used by active-duty service members from every service branch, along with civilians, contractors, reservists, and more. While you may not see any soldiers in uniform on base, you will indeed still see planes flying in and out.
Advertisement
The Buckley base maintains aircraft and conducts training
Ajax9/Getty Images
Buckley Space Force Base’s name change didn’t alter the base’s core mission, but simply reflects its realignment under the Space Force. Its main mission, to “[e]mpower Joint and Allied dominance across all domains through unrivaled global combat support,” falls under several domains, including air, space, cyberspace, land, and sea. Major units that are stationed there include the Colorado Air National Guard’s 140th Wing, which flies and maintains F-16C+ Fighting Falcon aircraft.
In addition to the Fighting Falcon, Buckley sees a wide variety of aircraft flying into and out of the base. In 2025, six MV-22B Ospreys from the Marine Corps conducted training out of Buckley, giving crews high-elevation experience for potential future operations and illustrating Buckley’s contribution to joint operations throughout the region and beyond.
The United States Space Force is a branch of the U.S. Armed Forces and operates six bases across the country, including Buckley. There are two more bases in Colorado, one in Florida, and two in California. The organization’s mission is to “secure our nation’s interest in, from, and to space.” At the time of this writing, there were 9,400 active duty members, also known as Guardians. One has even been to space, launching to the International Space Station in 2024.
Some social workers are reaching a breaking point, leading them to leave the profession
A quiet crisis is unfolding among Singapore’s social workers, the professionals who keep vulnerable families from falling through the cracks.
Many are juggling 30 to 50 active cases at any given time, and alongside the emotional demands of the job, social workers typically start on modest salaries of around S$4,000. Some are even reaching a breaking point, with the pressure in certain cases leading practitioners to leave the profession altogether.
What does a typical day look like for these workers, and what measures are in place to help them cope with mounting stress?
Too many cases, too little time
Image Credit: Nattakorn_Maneerat via Shutterstock
On paper, social workers in Singapore manage an average of 22 cases per year, according to the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF). On the ground, however, several practitioners have told media outlets that the reality is markedly different.
In 2022, some social workers who spoke with former MP Louis Ng said they were managing between 30 and 50 cases at any given time—that’s almost at least 50% more than the average number from MSF. He described such workloads as excessive, warning that they are directly detrimental to the quality of care social workers can provide.
Advertisement
With caseloads that high, there is simply not enough time to give each family the attention it needs. And when a crisis strikes, they cannot choose between one client and another because everyone’s situation is equally serious.
The cases are not straightforward. A single file might involve family violence, a child at risk, a parent with untreated mental illness, and a household on the verge of eviction—all at once.
One social worker told Channel News Asia (CNA) that the job ultimately comes down to ensuring children are safe, the elderly have a place to stay, and families are not in conflict. But doing that well requires time that most social workers say they do not have.
Moreover, heavy administrative demands compound the problem. One worker noted that direct contact with clients—the actual work of helping—accounts for only 5 to 10% of his time. The rest is paperwork.
Advertisement
The COVID-19 pandemic has only worsened the strain on our social workers, with a Jul 2021 study by the Asian Social Work and Policy Review finding that nearly 60% of frontline social workers experienced anxiety at the height of the pandemic and about 45% even faced depression.
When passion becomes a liability
Image Credit: Ekkasit A Siam via Shutterstock
Many social workers enter the field driven by a strong sense of purpose. But within the sector, some say passion alone is not enough to sustain them—and may even be counterproductive.
An anonymous founder of Instagram account @SGSocialWorkMemes, known within the industry for its candid portrayal of social workers’ experiences, shared in an interview with CNA that this narrative can have unintended consequences.
Framing social workers as being motivated by outcomes rather than income, they said, can become an excuse to justify lower pay, turning fair compensation into a perceived bonus rather than an entitlement for the work and hours put in.
Starting salaries in the sector sit at around S$4,000 per month, with many earning between S$3,000 and S$4,000. For a role that carries significant responsibility and emotional strain, some argue that the pay does not adequately reflect the demands of the job.
Advertisement
The overemphasis on passion also, over time, feeds a broader misconception: that social work is something anyone can do, or that social workers are essentially paid volunteers. This undermines the real expertise, training, and skill the profession requires.
Burnout in practice
Image Credit: National Council of Social Service
Another social worker who spoke with CNA, Amelia (not her real name) has been in the sector for 10 years. She described a workday that sometimes runs from 9AM to 4AM, managing 20 of her own cases, supervising eight social workers who each carry an average of 30 cases, and responding to back-to-back crises throughout.
These crises can range from a text about a client running out of milk powder for their child, to a message about a husband beating his wife—sometimes with a photo of a bruise or bloody wound attached—to bringing three children to the hospital and having them admitted at 4AM, just five hours before work begins the next morning.
This is what burnout looks like in social work: not just exhaustion, but vicarious trauma and compassion fatigue accumulated over years of absorbing other people’s worst moments. As one worker described it, “The more you do, the more you can’t look away.”
Beyond the emotional toll, social workers also describe structural frustrations. One recurring requirement is “mandatory sightings” of children—home visits or video calls to physically verify their safety. Workers say this surveillance function can sit uneasily alongside the profession’s broader aim of supporting marginalised families rather than monitoring them.
Advertisement
Tensions are further compounded by rigid programme structures in Singapore’s social service system. When funding and targets are tied to specific outcomes, such as employment, social workers may find themselves unable to formally address interconnected issues like housing instability or mental health, even when these are clearly central to a family’s situation. Watching those needs go unmet within a system too narrowly defined can add to long-term strain.
What is being done
Image Credit: BrightSparks
The pressures on our social workers have not gone unnoticed.
MSF has been progressively revising salary guidelines in recent years. In the latest update for the social service sector, starting salaries for social workers and counsellors rose by 3% in 2025 to S$3,970.
Overall, recommended salaries across roles in the sector increased by an average of 5%. Some positions saw larger adjustments of up to 15% in the 2026 financial year, which runs from Apr 2026 to Mar 2027.
Beyond pay adjustments, the National Council of Social Service also rolled out the Sabbatical Leave Scheme last Feb, offering social service professionals 10 weeks of paid sabbatical leave with salary support of up to S$15,000 to recharge and rejuvenate, on the condition that participants mentor junior colleagues and share their learnings upon return.
Advertisement
Taken together, these measures reflect gradual efforts to strengthen the sector, though growth remains modest relative to demand. As of Dec 2024, there were 3,031 accredited social work professionals in Singapore—an increase of about 7.8% in the number of registered social workers from the year before.
To expand the workforce, several efforts are underway.
In Sept 2025, the Singapore University of Social Sciences launched its sixth school, the School of Social Work and Social Development, aimed at strengthening the sector through education, research and partnerships. The launch comes as Singapore faces increasingly complex challenges and a projected demand for 2,000 additional social service professionals over the next five years.
The underlying question
Singapore’s social service sector needs to expand because the need for it is growing. An ageing population, rising mental health concerns, and increasingly complex, multi-generational family issues are driving up caseloads.
Advertisement
But social work carries a high level of responsibility and an equally high emotional burden, with pay that many in the profession describe as modest relative to the demands of the job.
As the gap between rising demand and limited capacity persists, the question becomes whether the system can scale fast enough to sustain those holding it up—before burnout turns into attrition, and attrition into gaps in care for the families who need it most.
Read other articles we’ve written on Singaporean businesses here.
Google I/O 2026 starts on May 19, and while we already have a pretty good idea of what to expect, there’s plenty of room for surprises. The tech giant has been all-in on AI for the past few years, and that probably won’t change, but there could be a few hardware announcements on tap this year.
From Android XR glasses to hearing more about Aluminum OS, there’s a lot to look forward to. Below, we’ll fill you in on what we expect Google to talk about during the I/O keynote.
More AI features
We expect Google to announce several new artificial intelligence features that integrate further into its products. Now that agentic AI is all the rage, we’ll most likely see Google lean even further in this direction. This type of AI can perform tasks on your behalf, like controlling your computer, with minimal oversight. We’ll have to wait and see what and how many AI features Google announces this time.
Advertisement
Let’s also not exclude updates to existing or new products that Google could announce. Veo, Lyria, Beam and countless others could get some spotlight at this year’s conference.
Veo and Lyria are Google’s AI-generated video and music tools, respectively, and have continued to improve since they were originally announced. Beam is an ambitious and futuristic way of video conferencing that uses several cameras to make you appear as though you’re speaking directly to the person in front of you as a 3D model.
Gemini 4.0
The next generation Gemini is likely going to be announced at Google I/O 2026
Advertisement
Thomas Fuller/Getty Images
Among all the AI announcements, we’re expecting Google to spend a significant amount of time talking about its flagship AI model for Gemini. Whether it gets a solid 4.0 status or something like a 3.8, we know the new version of Gemini will likely be one of the biggest announcements of Google I/O 2026.
Exactly what Google has been working on with Gemini is anyone’s guess. It’s easy enough to assume that the latest model will be smarter and faster than previous models, but Gemini itself is in nearly every Google product these days, so how the latest and greatest AI from Google trickles down will be interesting to see.
Google recently released a new notebooks feature for Gemini that will let you store sources for a particular topic in one place for easy access. Notebooks are self-contained databases full of sources on a particular topic that you can continue to add to. Gemini will use a notebook for context, so you don’t have to start all over again with information sources.
Those notebooks also sync directly with Google’s AI research assistant NotebookLM, allowing you to create a host of different outputs, like video overviews, charts and more. One of the main differentiators between NotebookLM and Gemini is that NotebookLM will only use your notebook as the source of truth, whereas Gemini will scour the internet with the notebook’s context for the search.
Advertisement
Gemini can also now create dynamic and interactive simulations directly in your chats when you ask it to “show you” or “visualize” something.
Google hasn’t slowed its rollout of Gemini features, so a lot more are likely on their way with the latest version of the AI model.
Android XR Glasses
Android XR will most certainly steal some of the spotlight during this year’s I/O conference.
Advertisement
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Google showed off its Android XR glasses at last year’s I/O, along with a few partnerships it formed to create them, so we’ll likely see the smart glasses become more of a product than a concept this year.
Smart glasses are gaining popularity, and Google took awhile getting back into the space after its first swing in the sector. Google Glass was way ahead of its time, but from the demos we’ve seen of Android XR, that patience may have paid off.
Google’s first set of “smart glasses” back in 2013 was an obvious pair of spectacles with a protruding lens that the wearer could view information on, and even take photos and record video. The product was met with immediate and significant pushback as an invasion of privacy, as well as being elitist and rude. This eventually resulted in the term for the wearers as “Glassholes.”
A lot has changed since the introduction of Google Glass, and Android XR glasses won’t look nearly as obvious when released, which could make it even creepier, but at least they’ll come with a load of usable features like heads-up notifications, live translation and Gemini Live. They’re also launching into an established market now, with smart glasses competitors from Meta’s collaborations with Ray-Ban, Oakley and more. Samsung’s own Galaxy XR headset runs on the Android XR platform and is already available to purchase. This first piece of hardware running on the platform paves the way for more hardware, with smart glasses being a natural next step.
Advertisement
Google I/O could bring us more demos, final hardware details and a release date for when you’ll be able to get Android XR glasses in your hands. Given that there are multiple partners in the ring, the price ranges could vary, potentially offering both entry-level and high-end offerings.
Android 17
Google/Screenshot by CNET
Android is Google’s playground for showcasing the best of its AI features, though some of them may be exclusive to the new Pixel phones we expect to see later this year.
Google released the first beta version of Android 17, its phone-operating system, back in February, and three additional betas have been released since, with the latest in mid-April. We can expect the latest version of the OS to be released in its final form sometime in June or July, shortly before we expect the next family of Pixel devices to be announced. For the past few years, the new Pixel lineup has been announced in August during the Made by Google event.
So far, there are no blockbuster features in the Android 17 beta, but Google has introduced interesting tweaks throughout. One of the most interesting features so far is app bubbles, which allows you to quickly access any app in a floating window and dismiss it to a bubble on your screen.
Advertisement
Last year, Google separated its Android announcements into a separate show a week before its I/O conference: The Android Show. This allowed Google to spend more time talking about AI without sacrificing the announcements it had on tap for Android. Whether The Android Show will return this year remains to be seen — though reportedly, a YouTube placeholder for the event was accidentally set live last week before being taken down.
Aluminum OS
One of the most interesting projects Google has been cooking up is a new operating system that merges Android and ChromeOS. Dubbed Aluminum OS, the product will bring Android to laptops and other devices with the full Chrome web browsing experience.
When exactly we’ll see hardware for the new OS is still unknown, but Google could surprise us with partnership announcements or even a full product announcement at I/O this year. The return of a Google-made Pixelbook doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility, either.
Merging both of Google’s operating systems will likely bring a more seamless software experience between how AluminumOS computers and Android phones interact.
Overview’s satellites will collect sunlight continuously in geosynchronous orbit and beam it as near-infrared light to existing ground solar installations, which convert it to electricity. The approach extends solar farm output through the night without new land, new grid connections, or new infrastructure on the ground.
Meta has signed an agreement with Overview Energy, a space solar startup, to secure up to 1 gigawatt of power from satellites that collect solar energy in orbit and beam it to Earth as near-infrared light.
An initial orbital demonstration is planned for January 2028; commercial power delivery is expected in 2030. Financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.
The deal is the first commercial capacity reservation for space-based solar energy by any company, and it marks the highest-profile endorsement yet of a technology that has long occupied the realm of speculative engineering.
Advertisement
The core problem the deal is addressing is the most pressing operational constraint in AI infrastructure: data centres need electricity around the clock, but most renewable energy sources, wind and solar, are intermittent by nature.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Meta’s data centres used more than 18,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2024 alone, roughly equivalent to powering 1.7 million American households for a year. As the company expands its AI compute footprint, including the Hyperion data centre campus in Louisiana and the Prometheus campus in Ohio, the latter of which is being powered by nuclear energy, its total power demand will increase substantially.
Advertisement
The company’s target is to bring its renewable energy capacity to 30 gigawatts. The challenge is that even as companies commit to renewable energy, solar farms stop generating at night and wind farms are weather-dependent.
Battery storage at data-centre scale is expensive and land-intensive. Nuclear energy solves the intermittency problem but requires years of regulatory approval and construction. Space solar is a third path.
Overview’s design is meaningfully different from earlier space solar concepts that proposed using lasers or microwaves to beam energy from space to a central receiving station.
Those approaches face significant technical, safety, and regulatory barriers: microwave beams require large purpose-built rectenna installations, and high-intensity laser transmission raises aviation and safety concerns. O
Advertisement
verview instead uses a broad, low-intensity near-infrared beam, invisible to the naked eye and, according to CEO Marc Berte, safe to look at directly from the satellite, aimed not at a new receiving station but at an existing utility-scale solar farm.
That farm’s existing photovoltaic infrastructure converts the near-infrared light into electricity exactly as it would convert sunlight. The beam effectively extends the solar farm’s generation hours into the evening and nighttime, without requiring any new land, new grid connection, or new ground infrastructure.
The satellites will operate in geosynchronous orbit, remaining fixed relative to a given point on the Earth’s surface.
Overview was founded in 2022 and is based in Ashburn, Virginia, within the data-centre-dense corridor of northern Virginia that houses a large portion of the world’s internet infrastructure.
Advertisement
The company emerged from stealth in December 2025. It has already demonstrated power beaming from a moving airborne platform to the ground, a precursor to the space-based transmission it is developing.
The satellite LEO demonstration planned for January 2028 will be the first test of energy transmission from orbit. The advisory board includes Jim Bridenstine, former NASA Administrator and former Congressman; Mike Griffin, former NASA Administrator; and Joseph Kelliher, former FERC Chairman and Executive Vice-President of Regulatory at NextEra Energy.
The three advisers span both the space and energy regulatory domains that Overview’s technology must navigate simultaneously.
Nat Sahlstrom, Meta’s Vice-President of Energy and Sustainability, framed the deal as a strategic hedge: “Space solar technology represents a transformative step forward by leveraging existing terrestrial infrastructure to deliver new, uninterrupted energy from orbit. We are excited to help bring this new energy technology to market.”
Advertisement
The caveats are substantial. The 2030 commercial delivery date is eight years from Overview’s founding, in a sector, space solar power, that has produced ambitious concepts but no commercial systems anywhere in the world.
The technical challenges of building, launching, and maintaining a geosynchronous satellite capable of continuous high-power energy transmission at commercial scale remain unsolved.
The agreement grants Meta early access to capacity from Overview’s system; it does not guarantee that the system will exist as planned, and financial terms are undisclosed.
Overview has introduced a new unit of measurement, “megawatt-photons”, to describe the light power required to generate a megawatt of electricity, a framing that reflects how unlike a standard power purchase agreement this deal is.
Advertisement
For Meta, the cost of signing a capacity reservation agreement with a pre-commercial startup is low relative to the potential benefit of securing 1 gigawatt of around-the-clock renewable power for its 2030 data centre estate.
If Overview succeeds, Meta has secured a strategic advantage. If Overview does not, Meta has lost the cost of signing the agreement.
John Sayles aims wide with Lone Star. Set along the Texas border, the film tries to unpack history, identity, and the uneasy balance between communities that live side by side but don’t always trust each other. When a skeleton turns up in the desert, Sheriff Sam Deeds (Chris Cooper) starts digging into the past, and it doesn’t take long before the town’s version of its own history begins to fall apart.
At the center is the legacy of two very different lawmen. One ruled through fear and didn’t bother hiding it (Kris Kristofferson). The other built a reputation on fairness, or at least something close to it (Matthew McConaughey). The problem is that reputations don’t always survive scrutiny, especially in a place where people have learned to keep certain details buried because it’s easier that way. And out there, there’s always somewhere to dig… and always someone with a shovel riding shotgun in the flatbed.
Sayles layers in multiple threads; racial tension, cross-border identity, old relationships that never fully resolved, but not all of them land with the same weight. The film wants to say something meaningful about the U.S.–Mexico border and life in Texas, but it never quite feels grounded in the reality of the place. The politics come across as constructed rather than observed, and the conflicts often feel more outlined than lived in.
That’s where the comparison to something like No Country for Old Men becomes unavoidable. That film actually gets West Texas; the silence, the distance, the way tension just hangs in the air like heat off the asphalt. Lone Star gestures in that direction but doesn’t fully get there.
Advertisement
There’s still value in the way it connects past and present, and the performances keep it moving, but the film never quite finds the edge it needs. It circles big ideas without fully committing to them, and in a story built around buried truths, that hesitation stands out.
Image Quality
Criterion’s release of Lone Star comes as a 4K Ultra HD and Blu-ray combo. The 4K disc is region-free, while the Blu-ray is Region A locked. The new restoration was supervised by director John Sayles and cinematographer Stuart Dryburgh, sourced from the original 35mm camera negative and scanned in 4K. I watched the film in Dolby Vision and also spent time comparing it to the included Blu-ray.
The 4K presentation is a clear step forward, but it doesn’t try to reinvent the film. Detail is stronger, especially in wide outdoor shots where the landscape has more separation and depth. Close-ups benefit as well, with better definition and more stable textures. Nothing looks overly processed, and the image maintains a natural appearance throughout.
Color handling is consistent. Skin tones look correct, and the film’s mix of dusty outdoor locations, interiors, and flashbacks is handled without any noticeable imbalance. Dolby Vision helps keep darker scenes under control, but this isn’t a dramatic HDR showcase. The gains are more about stability and refinement than major shifts in contrast.
Advertisement
The Blu-ray is still solid, but the differences are easy to spot on a larger screen. The 4K disc offers cleaner fine detail, slightly better color separation, and improved depth. It’s not a radical gap, but it’s enough to make the 4K version the preferred way to watch.
Stereo Playback Only
Audio is limited to a single English DTS HD Master Audio 2.0 track, with optional English SDH subtitles that appear within the frame.
This isn’t a film that leans on big dynamic swings or aggressive sound design. It’s more about small details and consistency. Ambient sounds, music, and occasional effects like gunshots are all handled in a way that supports the setting without calling attention to themselves.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Dialogue is clear and easy to follow, which matters given how much of the story is driven through conversations. The track also does a good job maintaining a consistent feel between present-day scenes and flashbacks, so nothing feels disconnected.
Advertisement
The 4K disc does not include any bonus features.
All extras are on the Blu-ray. The main addition is a 39-minute conversation between John Sayles and filmmaker Gregory Nava. It covers the origins of Lone Star, Sayles’s approach to storytelling, and how the idea of the “border” factors into both the film and his broader work. It’s direct and stays focused on the material.
There’s also a 19-minute segment with cinematographer Stuart Dryburgh, where he discusses the visual approach and his collaboration with Sayles. It’s more technical but still accessible.
The rest is standard. A vintage U.S. trailer is included, along with a printed leaflet featuring an essay by Domino Renee Perez and technical notes.
Advertisement
Overall, the extras are limited but relevant to the film.
22-year-old Evan Tangeman of Newport Beach, California, was sentenced to 70 months in prison for laundering funds stolen in a massive $230 million cryptocurrency heist.
According to court documents, Tangeman (also known as “E,” “Tate,” and “Evan|Exchanger”) helped the suspects behind the crypto-heist launder at least $3.5 million between October 2023 and May 2025.
Fourteen suspects were charged in September 2024 and May 2025 in a RICO conspiracy for over $230 million in cryptocurrency and laundering the funds using crypto exchanges and mixing services.
20-year-old Malone Lam (aka “Greavys,” “Anne Hathaway,” and “$$$”) and 21-year-old Jeandiel Serrano (aka “Box,” “VersaceGod,” and “@SkidStar”) were arrested and charged in September 2024 for allegedly stealing over 4,100 Bitcoin from a Washington, D.C., victim (worth more than $230 million at the time) in an August 2024 attack.
As crypto fraud investigator ZachXBT found, they targeted a Genesis crypto exchange creditor using spoofed phone numbers and impersonating customer support at Google and Gemini.
Advertisement
While impersonating a member of the Gemini support team, they claimed the victim’s account had been compromised, tricking them into resetting their two-factor authentication (2FA) and sharing their screen using the AnyDesk remote desktop application. This allowed them to steal the victim’s cryptocurrency after gaining access to the Bitcoin Core private keys.
Next, they allegedly laundered the stolen funds via a combination of crypto mixers and exchanges, with the help of accomplices (including Tangeman), using “peel chains,” pass-through wallets, and virtual private networks (VPNs) to hide their identities and locations throughout the scheme.
Stolen crypto being transferred (ZachXBT)
The other nine suspects (including Tangeman) were indicted in May 2025 and are facing charges of racketeering conspiracy, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
The group used the stolen cryptocurrency to finance their lavish lifestyles, including private security guards, high-end watches, designer handbags, nightclub outings ranging up to $500,000 per evening, and international travel.
They also rented homes in Los Angeles, the Hamptons, and Miami for $40,000 to $80,000 per month, as well as private jets and a fleet of at least 28 cars valued from $100,000 to $3.8 million (including a widebody Lamborghini Urus for Tangeman).
Advertisement
“This criminal enterprise was built on greed so brazen it borders on the cartoonish. They stole millions, spent it on half-million-dollar nightclub tabs, Lamborghinis, and Rolexes,” U.S. Attorney Pirro said on Friday.
“But Evan Tangeman didn’t just launder the money that fueled that lifestyle. When his co-conspirators were arrested, he moved to destroy the evidence. That is consciousness of guilt, and this office and the court have treated that accordingly.”
Tangeman pleaded guilty in December 2025 to laundering stolen funds for a criminal organization as part of a RICO conspiracy. He was sentenced to 70 months in prison and ordered to serve three years of supervised release afterward.
45-year-old Kunal Mehta (aka “Papa,” “The Accountant,” and “Shrek”) also pleaded guilty in November 2025 to helping to launder at least $25 million of the stolen cryptocurrency and is currently awaiting sentencing.
Advertisement
AI chained four zero-days into one exploit that bypassed both renderer and OS sandboxes. A wave of new exploits is coming.
At the Autonomous Validation Summit (May 12 & 14), see how autonomous, context-rich validation finds what’s exploitable, proves controls hold, and closes the remediation loop.
The bill specifically blocked the construction of data centers that consume 20 megawatts of power or more and directs state agencies and other entities to not issue permits unless proposed projects fall under those energy needs. Passing the bill would also require the creation of a “Maine Data Center Coordination Council” that would “provide strategic input, facilitate coordinated state planning considerations and evaluate policy tools to address data center opportunities and related benefits and risks to the State.”
While Mills killed this attempt at data center regulation, she said she would sign an executive order calling for the creation of a council like the one proposed in the bill. She also signed LD 713, a bill that prohibits data centers from participating in Maine’s business development tax incentive programs.
Maine is far from the only state pursuing data center bans or temporary blocks. There are at least 12 other states exploring similar legislation, like New York, where lawmakers recently introduced a bill that would block the construction of new data centers for at least three years. At the federal level, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) endorsed a bill that would not only create a moratorium on new data center construction, but also any upgrades to existing facilities.
Advertisement
Any desire to slow down AI development or the infrastructure that makes it possible runs counter to the demands of tech companies, and the perspective of the Trump administration, who’s actively encouraging faster AI buildout in the US. President Donald Trump’s recent AI framework even called for the process of building and powering data centers to be streamlined in March.
AXPONA 2026 was a tremendous show by any metric; bigger crowds, stronger energy, and more gear than anyone could reasonably process without developing a caffeine dependency and mild resentment toward elevators. We’re already counting the days until next year. But let’s not pretend everything was perfect. If you were hunting for genuinely affordable loudspeakers, the pool was shallower than it should have been. Which is exactly why the forthcoming Talisman R from Ruark stood out like a Chabad House in King’s Landing.
Plenty of six-figure systems flexing for Instagram, not nearly enough options for people who actually have to pay their mortgage or whose children can’t survive on a diet of char dogs from the Weiners Circle and Portillo’s — although a much thinner and younger version of myself did just that for almost a month back in 2000. Pickle spears and tomatoes count as salad for those who might be wondering.
There were, however, some notable exceptions. Quad has something new cooking that we’re not quite ready to spill the mushy peas on yet. Paradigm showed off the new Premier Series v2, which looks like a serious play in the sane-price category. SVS continues to show up for people who want performance without selling a kidney. Acoustic Energy remains quietly consistent. And then there was this one—slightly under the radar, a little cagey on details, and far more interesting than it had any right to be.
The Ruark Audio Talisman R was one of the more surprising debuts at the show. It’s Ruark’s first floorstanding speaker in roughly two decades, which alone makes it worth paying attention. If pricing lands under $2,000 in the U.S. through Fidelity Imports, this could turn into a problem for some of the usual suspects who seem convinced the 25-40 crowd is just waiting for a pair of 80-pound floorstanders from France or Denmark; speakers that demand a small power plant for amplification and a quick organ sale to close the deal.
Ruark Talisman R (floostanding) and Sabre-R (stand-mount) Loudspeakers
Physically, it’s compact for a floorstander; about 85 cm tall, or roughly 33.5 inches, but it doesn’t come across as compromised. Ruark kept things close to the vest in terms of full driver details, with more expected when it shows in Vienna, but what was on display didn’t feel like a prototype. Fit and finish looked sorted. No rough edges, no “we’ll fix that later” energy.
In the room, driven by the Ruark R610, it came out swinging. Bold, crisp, and articulate without sounding thin. The soundstage pushed wider than expected, especially with electronic material, and it held its composure at volume. This isn’t a polite, sit-in-the-corner tuning. It has some bite.
I wanted a pair within minutes, which is usually the only metric that matters. My ego keeps eyeing the ATC EL50 Anniversary Loudspeakers. My brain knows these are the smarter call.
What stuck with me is how flexible they felt. This isn’t a one trick demo speaker that only works in the room it was born in. It comes across like a blank canvas. You can shape it. I would not pair it with something lean or overly clinical. That feels like the wrong direction. It wants a bit of weight and drive behind it.
Think Lauren Bacall, but only after Humphrey Bogart already spotted her across the room and knew exactly what he was looking at. Cool, controlled, a little dangerous, and never trying too hard. The kind of presence that does not need to raise its voice to own the room. That is what this reminded me of. The Talisman R does not force a personality on you. It responds to what you give it.
The finish lines up with the rest of Ruark’s range. Clean, understated, nothing trying too hard. My brain immediately went practical. Concrete slab risers in my new home office, nearfield-ish setup, something that looks right without screaming for attention.
Pairing options feel wide open. A strong tube integrated would be a great call, yes something like Unison Research. Marantz, Rega, Cambridge Audio, even the Quad 3 I just reviewed all make sense. Each would push it in a slightly different direction, and that is the appeal.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
And here is the part that needs saying. There are not enough products like this getting attention. Too much focus on gloss and price tags that feel disconnected from reality. I have probably spent more time thinking about these than most of my peers. Fine by me.
If Ruark does not mess this up between now and September when they go on sale, this could be the steal of the year.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login