Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Afew weeks ago, Walled Culture wrote about Hadopi, France’s infamous copyright enforcement mechanism. The so-called “graduated response” – aka “three strikes and you are out” – has been around for over 15 years now, has cost French taxpayers a fortune, and has never achieved any of its aims. As the Walled Culture post suggested, the latest court ruling might finally put the benighted scheme out of its misery.
But even if it does, there is already another disproportionately heavy-handed attempt to enforce copyright up and running in the shape of Italy’s Piracy Shield. It works by blocking access to unauthorized material using court orders against Internet Service Providers (ISPs). That would clearly be problematic, even if it were implemented properly, and well run. It is neither, as academic research from the end of last year underlined. Since the massive extension of its powers a year ago, things have gone relatively quiet on the Piracy Shield front in terms of new developments, and there are no signs that the Italian government has taken the many criticisms to heart.
That’s depressing enough, but even more worrying is that alongside France’s Hadopi fiasco, and Italy’s troubling Piracy Shield, Spain too seems intent on letting the copyright industry attack the Internet’s basic plumbing and thereby disrupt other sites, as well as downgrading the experience of thousands of innocent users. It’s increasingly clear that what’s happening in Spain is now a serious a threat to the operation of the online world there, but one that is still little-known. That makes a post from the Disruptive Competition Project (DisCo), which comes from the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), particularly useful. Its title picks up on the similarities with Italy’s approach: “Repeating Failure: How Spanish Overblocking Ignores the Lessons of Italy’s Broken Piracy Shield”. Here’s what has been happening in Spain for over a year now:
Since early 2025, LaLiga (Spain’s top-tier football league) has been operating an aggressive and largely unchecked IP-address blocking regime in an attempt to tackle sports piracy. In 2024, LaLiga and several Spanish internet service providers (ISPs), some of whom have direct commercial interests in LaLiga broadcasting, sought a court order authorising the blocking of specific domain names.
They succeeded in this particular endeavour. However, LaLiga has thereafter continued to interpret this order as a green light to unilaterally select Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and domains to block, without ongoing court oversight or accountability.
It turns out that the legal basis of the current action is flimsy in the extreme:
The legal foundation of LaLiga’s anti-piracy enforcement model rests on a single, seven-page judgment issued by a Commercial Court in Barcelona on 18 December 2024. This ruling should have never been treated as setting a strong precedent, as it was not the result of a rigorous legal battle and didn’t seriously examine whether the blocking approach is lawful or proportionate under EU law.
As has happened so often in the world of copyright, the companies involved have taken a very narrow, and possibly flawed legal judgment and applied it as widely and broadly as possible, without asking further permission from the courts:
LaLiga now compiles and updates lists of IP addresses and domain names that it wants to see blocked. This process is completely opaque: these lists are not publicly disclosed, there is no independent technical or judicial validation before new addresses are added, and the court does not appear to continuously review any additions.
Once someone gets blocked, there is no redress mechanism to remove addresses from the list, even when they are no longer associated with infringing content, nor any appeal process for mistakenly blocked services.
It will come as no surprise to readers of this blog that this cavalier approach has already led to the overblocking of sites, just as has happened in Italy because of Piracy Shield’s poor implementation:
LaLiga’s approach has caused widespread disruption, preventing access to tens of thousands of legitimate websites in recent years – including critical services such as payment providers and a national health operator. This disproportionate cost is borne by innocent third parties and small businesses, reflecting a mistaken belief that the commercial interests of one dominant party should trump Spanish consumers’ rights to a functioning internet.
The second of those overblocking incidents is particularly serious, since it involves a healthcare provider, which potentially puts people’s lives at risk. According to an article on La Razón (via Google Translate):
During the weekend of December 13-14, access to the Madrid Health website was blocked. While the duration of the access interruption and the message displayed upon entering the website varied depending on the internet service provider blocking access at LaLiga’s request.
Despite the serious nature of this overblocking, which effectively places the enforcement of copyright above protecting people’s health, the Spanish government is trying to wash its hands of the problem:
The situation has become so severe that members of the Spanish Parliament have sought explanations from the government. While acknowledging that the blocks have significantly impacted legitimate websites, the Spanish Government maintains that this is a judicial matter falling under the jurisdiction of the courts.
However, the courts seem to be entirely on the side of LaLiga, since they didn’t even give Internet companies a chance to present their side of the story earlier this year.
In February 2026, the Commercial Court of Córdoba even granted [LaLiga] an ex-parte preliminary injunction against NordVPN and ProtonVPN. This means the court issued a binding order, based solely on LaLiga’s arguments, without notifying those virtual private networks (VPNs) or allowing them to present a defence beforehand. The VPNs only discovered the judgment through the media and are now obliged to implement the blocks enforced by LaLiga.
It’s true that the same court has just rejected LaLiga’s request for coercive fines, and accepted that there was a technical dispute over whether the blocking could be implemented. But the refusal to allow the VPN companies to present a defense remains a deeply troubling precedent, and runs contrary to basic principles of justice. Moreover, as TorrentFreak reports, this latest ruling may be only a temporary reprieve for the VPN providers:
The league confirms that the decision merely sets aside the coercive fines while the proceedings continue, stressing that it does not exempt NordVPN from implementing IP blocks where LaLiga can prove piracy is taking place.
It is the usual one-sided justice that is typical when copyright is involved. It seems that LaLiga is being given carte blanche to do whatever it likes here, and never mind the consequences for Internet companies and their users. As Hadopi fades, and Italy’s Piracy Shield carries on as before, the fear has to be that Spain’s unconstrained approach to copyright enforcement could end up being worse than both.
There is currently a rare opportunity to comment on the issue of EU copyright enforcement in the realm of sports and other live events. There is an open Call for Evidence from the European Commission, which:
aims to collect the information necessary to support the review of the 2019 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive, and to seek feedback on the challenges linked in particular to the exercise of copyright and related rights in the context of technological developments and potential ways to address them.
As well as that general review of the main EU Copyright Directive, discussed at length in Walled Culture the book (free digital versions available), and the issue of live streaming, the Commission is seeking people’s views on an important upcoming legislative proposal aimed at strengthening copyright (yet again) in the light of AI, which is planned for the first quarter of 2027. The Call for Evidence closes on 25 June, so you have a couple of weeks to hone your thoughts and submit them. Based on previous experience, we can probably expect the European Commission to ignore what anyone except the copyright industry thinks, but it’s worth a try.
Follow me @glynmoody on Mastodon and on Bluesky. Republished from WalledCulture.
Filed Under: copyright, france, hadopi, ip blocks, italy, piracy shield, spain
Companies: laliga, nordvpn, proton

Microsoft announced Wednesday that over the past two decades, it has become dramatically more efficient in its use of water to cool data centers, slashing its consumption rate by 90% compared to levels when it opened its first facilities in the early 2000s. The company used 0.27 liters per kilowatt-hour last year, about three times better than the industry average.
Microsoft has for the first time replenished more fresh water globally than it consumes, making important progress on its 2030 goal of being water positive across its operations.
And if this sounds familiar, you’re not wrong. Earlier this month, Amazon shared similar water usage stats (though it performed better) and Google came out with updated pledges around being water positive.
The tech giants are working to quench concerns about water use, which has become a key point of contention nationwide. Communities and local leaders are protesting and passing moratoriums on new data center construction. Other concerns include significant energy use that could drive up utility rates and noise complaints.
At the start of the year, Microsoft tried to get ahead of those fears by launching its Community-First AI Infrastructure initiative, in which it vowed to cover its electricity costs and forgo local tax breaks. Last week, it came out in support of the Ratepayer Protection Act, a congressional measure addressing data center utility bill impacts, though it earlier opposed Washington state legislation targeting some of the same concerns.
Microsoft remains “deeply committed” to water protections, said Judy Priest, CTO of Cloud Operations & Innovation, and Steve Solomon, vice president of Datacenter Engineering, in a blog post Wednesday.
“We continue to advance datacenter innovations that reduce water use intensity while supporting the growing performance demands of cloud and AI services,” Priest and Solomon said.
Data centers use a variety of strategies to keep electronics cool, including fans, evaporative cooling, air conditioning and direct liquid cooling. The approaches involve tradeoffs: air conditioning draws more electricity but saves water, while evaporative cooling is less energy-intensive but consumes more.
Microsoft’s approaches to curb its water use include:
Comparing companies on this front is tricky. Microsoft’s liters-per-kilowatt-hour figure applies only to data centers it owns, while Amazon’s includes both its own computing facilities and leased ones.
And although Microsoft made notable progress on the goal set in 2020 of becoming water positive within a decade, it takes a global tally of water use and replenishment. In theory, that means water used in a desert climate could be offset by Microsoft’s actions in a wetter region as regards its overarching target.The Community-First AI Infrastructure initiative, however, pledges to replenish more water than it uses in each district where it operates AI data centers.
That aligns with the approach used by Amazon and Google, though Amazon’s replenishment goal covers only data centers, not all of its operations.
While concern about data center water use is growing, it remains relatively modest in the broader context: data centers account for about 0.5% of all industrial water use worldwide, as Amazon recently noted.
In terms of total volume, Microsoft withdrew 2.7 billion gallons of water in fiscal year 2024 across its data centers and its other operations. For context, Seattle Public Utilities delivers roughly 43 billion gallons each year to 1.6 million people in its service area.
Editor’s note: Story updated to clarify that progress on the 2030 water positive goal is ongoing.
Prime Day has become one of the biggest shopping events of the year and something many shoppers look forward to. For a lot of people, it’s the perfect time to finally replace products they’ve been meaning to swap out.
Some of the best purchases are the ones you end up using every single day. Whether it’s the hair dryer you reach for every morning, the grooming tools sitting on your bathroom counter, or the products that help you get ready for work, a night out, or whatever the day has in store, these are often the items that deliver the most value over time.
Laifen has built a reputation around creating personal-care products that combine sleek design with high-performance technology. This Prime Day, the brand is offering 40% off two of its standout products: the SE 2 Hair Dryer in Purple and the P3 Pro Electric Shaver.
Part of what makes Laifen stand out is its focus on bringing premium personal-care technology into everyday routines. Products like high-speed hair dryers and advanced electric shavers were once considered specialty purchases, but consumers today are increasingly looking for tools that combine performance, convenience, and thoughtful design. Prime Day makes that experience more accessible, giving shoppers an opportunity to try products that can improve routines they already have.

Most people don’t spend much time thinking about their hair dryer until they’re standing in front of the mirror wishing the process would go a little faster. Getting ready in the morning is already time-consuming enough, especially on busy days when every minute counts.
Powered by Laifen’s high-speed motor technology, the SE 2 delivers fast drying performance in a lightweight design that’s comfortable to hold. Instead of spending extra time drying your hair before you can move on to styling, it’s designed to help streamline the process. When you’re using a hair dryer every morning, even saving a few minutes can make a noticeable difference over time.
High-speed hair dryers have become increasingly popular over the last few years, and it’s easy to see why. Many people are looking for ways to make their morning routines more efficient without sacrificing results. Whether you’re heading into the office, getting ready for a weekend event, or simply trying to get out the door on time, spending less time drying your hair is always a plus.
Beyond speed, many shoppers are also looking for styling tools that help them achieve smoother, healthier-looking results without spending extra time getting ready. That’s part of the appeal of newer high-speed dryers. They help simplify the process while still delivering the polished look many people want before heading out the door.
Available in a vibrant purple, it offers a fun pop of color compared to the traditional styling tools most people are used to. It’s also built with everyday use in mind. The lightweight design makes it comfortable to hold whether you’re doing a quick dry before work or spending a little more time getting ready for a night out.
The compact design also makes it easy to toss into a suitcase or weekender bag. For frequent travelers, having a styling tool that delivers strong performance without taking up too much space is always a plus. Whether you’re packing for a weekend getaway or a longer trip, it’s nice to have a dryer you can bring along instead of relying on whatever happens to be available at your destination.
The SE 2 also feels like a more modern take on a product that many people have owned for years without ever thinking about replacing it. For anyone looking to replace an older hair dryer, this feels like the time to do it. It combines speed, portability, and everyday convenience in a product you’ll likely reach for long after Prime Day comes to an end.

While the SE 2 is focused on helping streamline the morning routine, the P3 Pro Electric Shaver tackles another task that many people do on a regular basis.
A good electric shaver is one of those products you don’t think much about until you’re using one that isn’t getting the job done. Older models can require multiple passes, take longer to complete a shave, and create unnecessary irritation in the process. When grooming is part of your daily or weekly routine, those inconveniences can add up quickly.
The P3 Pro features a powerful linear motor and advanced three-blade shaving system that helps deliver a close, efficient shave. It has a sleek look and aims to create a more comfortable shaving experience while helping users spend less time standing in front of the mirror. For anyone still using an older electric shaver, those improvements are likely to be noticeable right away.
Just like a quality hair dryer can improve a morning routine, a reliable electric shaver can make daily grooming feel less like a chore. Most people aren’t looking to add more steps to their routine. They simply want products that work well, feel comfortable to use, and help them get on with their day.
The P3 Pro focuses on achieving a close shave while helping make the overall experience smoother and more comfortable. It keeps the focus on performance and convenience, making it a practical choice.
Small improvements to products you use regularly can make a bigger difference than you might expect. A more comfortable shave, fewer passes, and less time spent standing in front of the mirror may not sound dramatic, but those benefits add up over time. For shoppers looking to simplify everyday routines, that’s often where the biggest value comes from.
Taken together, the SE 2 and P3 Pro help bookend the day. One helps make busy mornings a little easier, while the other helps simplify grooming at the end of the day. Rather than focusing on products that only get occasional use, Laifen’s Prime Day event centers on products that become part of everyday life.
Prime Day is an opportunity to save on products that deliver value long after the sale ends.
The Laifen SE 2 Hair Dryer and P3 Pro Electric Shaver can easily become part of your daily routine, whether you’re getting ready for work in the morning or winding down at the end of the day. Because they’re products used on a regular basis, the value goes beyond the initial purchase. They’re the kinds of items you’ll continue reaching for day after day.
With both products available at 40% off during Prime Day, shoppers can save on two everyday essentials while taking advantage of one of Laifen’s biggest promotions of the year. For anyone who has been considering replacing an aging hair dryer or finally swapping out their current shaver, now may be the perfect time to do it.
Sometimes the best Prime Day purchases are the ones you’ll end up using the most. Whether it’s a hair dryer you reach for every morning or a shaver that’s part of your regular routine, these are the kinds of products that continue delivering value long after Prime Day is over.
Wireless charging has become ubiquitous in recent years, with companies like Apple, Samsung and Google all embracing the technology. The benefit is obvious. It’s easier to plop a device on a charging pad than it is to wiggle in a USB-C cable.
Despite the convenience, there are some downsides with wireless charging tech. Generally speaking, wireless charging is inefficient, wasting more energy than wired charging. Let’s get into the why of it all and detail other risks associated with wireless charging.
Wireless chargers use more power to completely charge a device, when compared to a cable. A modern smartphone is a great example of this. Charging a smartphone with a wire from zero to 100 percent takes around 15Wh (watt-hours measure the amount of energy needed for a device to run for an hour). The same phone will require around 21Wh (40 percent more) to juice up via a wireless charger, according to a 2020 study by the enterprise platform OneZero. That number could vary based on the charger and how you use it — a 2024 test by iFixit found the energy gap between Apple’s MagSafe charger and wired charger to be slightly better at around 36 percent more power used, and also showed how misalignment on a charging pad could halve the efficiency of a wireless charger.
Wireless chargers also generate and waste more heat than wired chargers. Charging pads get pretty hot during use, which is a sure sign of wasted energy.
Yes and no. A daily difference of around 6Wh isn’t that big of a deal when considering a single wired charger versus a single wireless charger. However, it adds up when considering every wired charger versus every wireless charger. A year of charging up a smartphone with a cable takes around 5.5 kilowatt-hours (kWh) and that shoots up to 7.6kWh with a wireless charger.
Studies have indicated that 30 to 66 percent of smartphone owners use wireless charging pads and related accessories at home, according to the Wireless Power Consortium and the Deloitte Mobile Consumer Survey UK. There are around 7.6 billion smartphones in the world. If 30 percent of those smartphones are being charged wirelessly that would indicate an annual global power waste of 4,830GWh. This amount of energy could power hundreds of thousands of homes for a year. Wireless charging products are becoming more popular every year, so this metric will only go up.
Wireless chargers transfer power through electromagnetic induction. This is simply not as efficient as a direct charge, as the energy has to go through more steps to be usable. There’s also an air gap between the phone and the charger, which lets heat escape.
This is compounded by phone cases and the like, which increase the air gap. All told, wireless chargers lose anywhere from 20 to 30 percent of power throughout the whole process, due to heat dissipation. That’s on top of the 5-10 percent of losses that all chargers incur by converting the AC energy coming from an outlet to DC.
The heat that wireless chargers produce could degrade your phone’s battery over time. Modern phones have safety mechanisms in place to prevent overheating that could seriously degrade your battery or result in a fire hazard. These mechanisms, however useful, will result in your charging session being throttled to a lower speed if the battery reaches high temperatures around the 45C (113F) mark. Make sure to use the charging pad in a well-ventilated area and never put it underneath something like a blanket or pillow.
There are hundreds of chargers out there, and they aren’t all created equal. Cheap, unbranded chargers may lack crucial safety features like temperature sensors and foreign object detection. To that end, it can be dangerous to place metal objects between the phone and the charger. Finally, some powerful chargers can interfere with medical devices like pacemakers, as they generate magnetic fields strong enough to trigger the health aide’s “magnet mode” and alter the pacing rate.
Wireless charging uses more energy than wired charging, so it has a higher environmental impact than wired charging. Additionally, the charging pads will eventually become electronic waste. The technology’s tendency to degrade lithium-ion batteries over time could, in extreme examples, lead consumers to swap out their phones earlier than usual, which would have an additional environmental impact.
Wireless charging is getting more efficient, which is great news. This is due to better coil alignment and industry standards set by MagSafe and Qi2 products. However, it’s highly improbable that wireless charging ever catches up to wired charging. A wired connection is simple. It’s a plug that goes from point A to point B. Wireless charging requires energy to transmit through magnetic fields.
Despite some obvious benefits, there are some drawbacks to going with a wired charging solution. Cables degrade over time, and technology changes can force users to upgrade. We all have that cardboard box in the basement filled with dozens and dozens of barely functioning cables of various types. Also, charging ports can wear out after several years of use. Finally, it’s just more fun to plop a smartphone on a magical pad, when compared to plugging in a cord.
fjo3 shares a report from the AFP: The latest heatwave sweeping across Europe is a stark reminder that it is the world’s fastest-warming continent, stretching into an Arctic that is heating at an even greater pace. Britain, France, Italy and Spain have issued red alerts and health warnings for much of their territory this week as the region endures its second heat episode since May.
Here is a look at why Europe is warming faster than elsewhere: The planet as a whole is around 1.4C warmer than in preindustrial times, defined as 1850-1900. By comparison, Europe is around 2.4C hotter than the preindustrial era, according to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. The long-term rise in global average temperatures is mainly due to greenhouse gas emissions from burning oil, gas and coal, but it varies by regions due to a combination of factors. Land warms faster than the ocean as water can absorb more heat and cool through evaporation.
Shifts in atmospheric circulation have driven more frequent and more intense heatwaves in the European summer, according to Copernicus. High-pressure systems, which bring settled weather and higher temperatures, have become more common in Europe, Copernicus director Carlo Buontempo said. […] Another major reason is geography as Europe is connected to the Arctic, which is 3.2C warmer than in preindustrial times. The region’s rising temperatures are partly due to a process known as the albedo feedback. Bright snow and ice reflect much of the sun’s heat back into space, but as they melt they reveal darker, heat-absorbing surfaces such as land and the ocean.
In other parts of Europe, areas where snow was very frequent in winter have seen this coverage shrink, exposing dark land. Stricter air quality regulations have reduced aerosol emissions since the 1980s. But tackling the pollutant had the side effect of contributing to global warming, as these tiny airborne particles have a cooling effect by reflecting sunlight and making clouds more reflective.
Gemini did a pretty good job with more conversational commands, though you still need to be specific for some requests. For example, my three-story townhouse has two smart thermostats, one for the highest floor and another for the lower two. I asked to turn on the AC, which Gemini immediately did, but it didn’t ask me to specify which one and decided it was time for the upstairs AC to shine. It also defaulted to Eco mode, so I had to request that the thermostats be set to 75 degrees instead of the high 70s. Still, I was able to casually say “Can you set the temperature in the living room to 75, and upstairs too?” and it applied that to both smart thermostats.
Gemini Live is another way to converse with the Google Home Speaker (it’s only available on some older devices). You’ll tell the speaker “Hey Google, let’s talk,” and it’ll activate a conversational mode that will chat back and forth with you about any topics you bring up. I had a back-and-forth conversation with Gemini about my 3-year-old’s sleep schedule, how to treat sunburns on your scalp (you’ll never guess what I got this weekend), and asked about a summary of the previous night’s episode of Love Island (though Gemini didn’t have a recap yet of the episode that had premiered a few hours before).
Gemini also asked follow-up questions with each topic to keep the conversation going, but would change gears to whatever topic I introduced. It works as intended, but I’m not sure how useful it is in the home context—you’re more likely to use something like this on your smartphone. It’s just not my preferred way to learn or discuss new information, but audio learners might really like it.
I was excited to ask Gemini what it sees around the home via my Google security cameras, but the experience didn’t impress me as much as I hoped. Time and time again, I asked questions like whether the car was in the garage, and Gemini said that either it didn’t have access to that information or that I needed to upgrade my subscription tier to get the answer (you need Google Home Advanced).
Photograph: Nena Farrell
Google and Amazon made the same move at roughly the same time: a new small-sized smart speaker that promises the sound quality of larger speakers, retailing for $100. Smaller speakers like the previous Echo Dot models and the Google Home Mini have been popular because they can be placed anywhere, whether it’s on a crowded shelf or tucked into a corner of the kitchen, but they were also much cheaper.
Of course, this speaker is not just for playing music. Like its predecessors, the Google Home Speaker has three far-field microphones to let you chat with Gemini. It also has a stylish light ring around the bottom that lights up and changes color when you talk to it, when it is thinking and when it responds. It’s very much like the light ring on older Amazon Echo speakers, and I prefer it to the new lights on the latest Echos or the four lights that lit up on the front of the Nest Audio. It’s a nice visual touch for sure. The speaker does have familiar touch controls on top — tapping the left or right sides adjusts volume, while tapping the middle pauses and resumes media playback. So far, the microphones have no trouble picking up my voice across the room or over the din of music or conversation, either.
While the hardware itself is an unassuming, logical update, that’s only half the story. Google’s previous speakers were designed with the Google Assistant in mind, but this one is the first explicitly meant to work with the new Gemini for Home voice assistant. As the name suggests, it bakes in Gemini AI features, but there are some wrinkles beyond that. Google is also offering two different subscription options for managing your home, the $10/month (or $100/year) Standard plan and the $20/month ($200/year) Advanced option.
Standard gives you 30 days of “event-based” video history from cameras or doorbell cams; Gemini Live for more interactive conversations with the virtual assistant; alerts for things like familiar faces on cameras, garage door and package notifications; and smoke and CO2 alarm notifications. The Premium plan doubles the event-based video history to 60 days and adds 10 days of 24/7 history for cameras and wired doorbells. It also includes video history search, more detailed notifications and event descriptions and daily summaries of recorded events.
It sounds to me like unless you’re really invested in a video security setup that the Standard plan will work for most people. Plus, the Google Home Speaker comes with a six-month trial. If you don’t want to pay a monthly subscription, you’ll still have access to Gemini for Home which can do basic voice-activated tasks like playing music, setting timers and controlling smart home devices. However, you’ll need the subscription for Gemini Live to get the more conversational, back-and-forth experience for asking your speaker all of the random thoughts that might pop into your head.
I know that people have had loads of trouble with Google’s transition from the Google Assistant to Gemini, specifically around smart home automation. The Google Home subreddit is absolutely littered with complaints from unreliable execution to features ending up behind paywalls. I’ve had the Google Home Speaker for less than a week, and I also don’t have the smartest home, so I can’t say for sure how well this will perform for people with complex setups. But I was able to use the Google Home Speaker and Gemini to control a few speakers I had connected to the Google Home app as well as my RoboRock vacuum and a TV that runs Android.
I also chatted with Gemini Live about the World Cup schedule and the weather in various locations where games are being played. Gemini followed my questions about who was playing today, who was playing tomorrow, how teams did in their prior matches, what the forecast was for during the match and so forth. I was also able to use my voice to start creating an automation that would run my vacuum and put on a specific YouTube Music playlist every morning, though I had to jump into the Google Home app to fix some details it didn’t get right.
It’s unfortunate, but not entirely unexpected, that Google is locking some features behind a subscription. It had a previous subscription, Nest Aware, that also had two tiers that broke down similarly to these new Google Home plans. But putting things like Gemini Live and the ability to build a routine just by telling the speaker what you wanted to do behind the paywall is definitely a bummer.
Earlier this year America’s idiot king offered a no-bid contract to one of his ex-con Mara Lago donors to “fix” the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. It… did not go well. Said pool is now full of algae and peeling paint, and it’s created an interesting attention flashpoint for the press and another perfect metaphor for the Trump administration’s corrupt crony capitalist bonanza.
As ABC News reports, Trump has repeatedly (and falsely) tried to claim that the disaster is a result of vandalism, despite there being no evidence (the pool is under 24/7 video surveillance):
“Trump first made the claim the lining had been cut in a post on his social media platform on Saturday, saying then that vandals had put a 250-foot-long “gash” in the lining.
Neither the Interior Department nor the White House has provided evidence that the pool lining had been cut.”
Thin skinned authoritarian that he is, Trump doesn’t like when journalists explain how incompetent and corrupt he is. So he immediately took took his personal money-losing propaganda website to once again threaten ABC with lawsuits for doing (what really is fairly innocuous) journalism:

The man is genuinely not well.
ABC did, of course, pay Trump a $16 million bribe in 2024 to settle a baseless lawsuit the company could have easily won. But as Trump’s FCC has ramped up its censorship and harassment campaign against ABC, there have been signs that Disney Corporation is starting to show some backbone.
For example one recent filing by Disney/ABC makes it clear that Trump FCC boss Brendan Carr concocted a fake scandal in collaboration (with right-wing friendly broadcasters) to make it seem like ABC’s Houston affiliate did something illegal. All to manufacture a controversy surrounding Democratic Texas Senate hopeful James Talarico (whose empathy and hot girlfriend appear to upset Republicans greatly).
ABC has also recently been airing spots urging ABC viewers to give the FCC an earful about its multiple, overlapping efforts to censor ABC journalists and comedians. As Trump’s health and political influence wanes, you may see formerless feckless companies demonstrate something vaguely resembling a backbone; assuming they don’t have active mergers awaiting regulatory review.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, abc news, censorship, corruption, donald trump, free speech, journalism, media, reflecting pool
Companies: abc, disney
If you live on the East Coast, you have probably opened a winter utility bill and wondered how your electricity costs could possibly be that high. Every few years, the story makes headlines: a cold snap hits the Northeast, power prices spike to hundreds of dollars, and politicians demand answers. But the real explanation rarely makes it past the financial trading desks and utility commission meetings where it actually gets discussed.
Neel Somani, a former quantitative researcher at Citadel who covered power markets, has spent time breaking down this problem. Having studied the mechanics of energy pricing across multiple regions, Somani offers a perspective shaped by both the economics of electricity market structure and the operational realities that make the East Coast uniquely vulnerable to these spikes.
To understand why prices spike, you first need to understand how electricity is actually priced. It is not averaged or blended. The price of power at any given moment is set by the last, least-efficient unit of generation that must be turned on to meet total demand.
In New England, the grid operates a layered generation stack. At the bottom are the cheapest sources, renewables and nuclear, which run at near-zero marginal cost and go first. Then come natural gas generators, which vary in efficiency and cost. And then, at the very top of the stack, sit the oil generators: expensive, outdated, and almost never used.
“The first thing to know is that the price for power is based on the last megawatt of power that’s produced,” Somani explains. “In New England, you have renewables, you have a nuclear plant called Millstone, you have natural gas generators, and then you have oil generators. You almost never hear me talk about oil generators, because they’re so inefficient.”
That near-invisibility is by design. Oil-fired peaker plants are essentially emergency units, the equivalent of a backup generator in your basement that you never want to run. But in New England, they are relevant in ways they are not in other parts of the country, and understanding why brings us to the heart of the price spike problem.
New England sits at the end of a long, constrained natural gas pipeline network. The region does not produce its own gas. It imports it. And in winter, that pipeline capacity gets pulled in two directions at once.
“The winter is when things get interesting,” Somani notes. “In the winter in New England, natural gas has to be used to heat homes. If you don’t heat your home, your pipes can freeze, and that’s super expensive to fix. So people have some fixed amount of natural gas demand.”
This is the structural problem. Residential and commercial heating demand is relatively inelastic: people need to heat their homes regardless of price. When temperatures plunge, that demand becomes locked in, competing directly with the natural gas power plants’ need to generate electricity.
The result is predictable. There simply isn’t enough natural gas flowing through the pipelines to meet demand for heating and electricity generation simultaneously. When that constraint bites, grid operators have to reach higher up the generation stack. And that means turning on the oil units.
“There’s no longer enough natural gas to meet power demand,” Somani explains. “The way that’s handled in New England is you have to turn on some of the oil generators. I mentioned that price is set based on the least efficient unit of power, and that’s oil. And since that’s super expensive, which is one of the reasons power prices can rise significantly.”
This dynamic has played out repeatedly in recent years. During Winter Storm Fern in early 2026, New England real-time power prices spiked to between $400 and $700 per megawatt-hour. In January 2026, Massachusetts saw the highest natural gas price ever recorded in ISO-New England’s pricing database, which dates back to 2003. On January 27 of that year, wholesale electricity prices soared to $441.8 per megawatt-hour, compared with an average of $135.08 for the entire month of January 2025.
Here is where the economics become particularly pointed, and where Somani’s market background adds clarity that most reporting misses. It is not just that electricity prices rise when oil generators come online. Natural gas prices spike in lockstep, and the reason is rooted in basic incentive structures.
“Think about what happens if you’re a natural gas salesman in Algonquin, which is the natural gas hub in New England, you’re thinking that anyone you sell natural gas to is probably making a lot of money, because they can put it in a natural gas generator and get paid the oil price while only paying the natural gas price.”
The logic is airtight. If power generators can sell electricity at the oil-set price while burning natural gas, the margin is enormous. A rational gas seller will recognize this and raise the asking price for gas until that arbitrage disappears. They will keep raising it until the economics of generating power from natural gas and generating power from oil are roughly equivalent.
“It’s in your interest to keep raising the natural gas price until it’s basically the same cost to produce a megawatt of power from a natural gas unit as it is from an oil unit,” Somani says. “So the natural gas price also shoots up. And the natural gas sales guy isn’t going to charge any more, because if they charge more, they won’t sell all the natural gas. But if they charge less, they’re leaving money on the table.”
This loop is what creates the extreme natural gas price readings that economists and regulators have tracked over decades. The Algonquin Citygate hub, where New England receives much of its natural gas supply, regularly sees winter prices that dwarf those in the rest of the country. During recent cold snaps, Algonquin prices have climbed above $35 per million British thermal units, compared to national averages around $3.37. Data from ISO-New England confirm that oil and dual-fuel-fired generation overtakes natural gas-fired supply during the tightest conditions.
It would be tempting to blame these spikes purely on the weather. But the underlying cause is structural, and recognizing that distinction matters for anyone making decisions about energy infrastructure, policy, or cost management.
The core issue is constrained pipeline capacity. New England has long resisted major pipeline expansion, leaving the region dependent on a network that simply cannot move enough gas when winter demand peaks. As Philip Bartlett, chairman of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, has said publicly, being overly reliant on natural gas within a pipeline-constrained system is not workable.
The region does have options when pipelines max out. It can import liquefied natural gas, which at peak demand supplies up to 35 percent of New England’s gas supply. It can draw from Canadian hydro imports via interconnections to the north. And it can rely on fuel oil storage at dual-fuel plants. But each of these alternatives imposes its own constraints, and none eliminates the supply chain’s fragility.
For organizations that manage large energy costs or operate in affected regions, Somani’s framing offers a sound mental model. The question is not simply whether the weather will be cold this winter. The question is how much pipeline capacity exists, how much residential heating demand will compete with generation, and at what price point the oil generators become economically necessary.
Potential longer-term approaches to East Coast power price volatility may involve a combination of infrastructure investments, demand flexibility, and generation diversification. Expanding pipeline capacity, adding battery storage, building more renewable energy generation to reduce dependence on gas during peak periods, and modernizing transmission infrastructure all help reduce the region’s exposure to these spikes.
Some of these investments are already underway. Proposals for renewable energy projects in northern Maine, along with accompanying transmission lines, are moving forward. Battery storage is growing as operators recognize its value in absorbing cheap off-peak power and dispatching it during high-demand hours.
But the structural change is gradual, and in the meantime, the same market mechanics will continue to drive winter price spikes whenever temperatures fall hard enough and long enough to strain the pipeline network. The fundamentals have not changed, and neither has the logic: when the cheapest fuel runs short, the most expensive unit sets the price, and everyone downstream pays accordingly.
The Sonos Arc and newer Arc Ultra have long been among the standalone soundbars to beat for those seeking convincing Dolby Atmos sound in a minimalist design. Protracted app issues aside, Sonos’ chic sonic tube combines versatile multi-room expandability with a potent mix of expansive spatial audio effects, musicality, and authoritative bass, even without a sidecar subwoofer. While there have been plenty of challengers over the years, few have matched their performance for the money.
This year brings some impressive new contenders jockying for your console, including Samsung’s all-new HW-QS90H. This bar may have an uninspired name, and the design isn’t as striking as the Arc Ultra’s Scandi minimalism or Bose’s flashy new Lifestyle Ultra bar, but Samsung came to play. Within the QS90H’s brick-like frame is a well-balanced collection of drivers for solid immersion with 3D audio formats and enough bass to carve out serious cinematic drama from your favorite content.
The QS90H is no “Sonos killer,” and it doesn’t try to compete with the brand’s multi-room flexibility, but it offers plenty of forward-thinking features, especially for those with a newer Samsung TV. Most importantly, after dominating the multi-component soundbar space with the fantastic Q990 series for several generations, Samsung finally has its own standalone Atmos bar with competitive performance in a superbly simplified package.

The QS90H’s uniform industrial aesthetic feels blatantly basic when you first pull it from the foam, but a closer look reveals a few stylish deviations from Samsung’s other soundbars. Most notable are the thin chocolate ribbons of woodgrain plastic along the top, which add some personality to the otherwise faceless front grille.
A small collection of LEDs at the bar’s right face indicates settings and source changes, including a satisfying Knight Rider-esque volume beam, but like a lot of new models, the system is minimalist at best. The bar’s lengthy 49-inch frame makes it best suited for larger TVs like the 65-inch S90H OLED I used for my review, while its 2.7-inch height should slip beneath most modern screens. I do wish Samsung would follow Sony’s lead and add adjustable feet, which can help the bar’s 5-inch depth rise above a butting pedestal stand.
As I’ve come to expect from modern soundbars, there’s little variety for wired connection, with exactly zero analog inputs for legacy devices like a turntable, but unlike the pricier Arc Ultra and Bose Lifestyle Ultra, the QS90H does have a spare HDMI input for a Blu-ray player or game console. Oddly for 2026, it doesn’t support HDMI 2.1, meaning no passthrough for gaming features like VRR or 4K @ 120 Hz, but at least it’s an extra connection. A separate HDMI eARC port provides TV connection for seamless control of volume and power with most TV remotes, alongside an optical input for older devices (not compatible with 3D audio).
Those with select newer Samsung TVs like the S90H OLED can connect the bar wirelessly over Wi-Fi, no HDMI required. Other wireless connection options include Bluetooth and Wi-Fi streaming via Google Cast, Apple AirPlay, Spotify Connect, and TIDAL Connect. The bar is also Roon Ready for multi-room connectivity with other Roon hardware.
Unlike Sonos and Bose, Samsung doesn’t skimp on DTS, providing expansive support including DTS:X and full-range DTS-HD Master Audio and DTS-HD High Res Audio, along with lossless Dolby Atmos and Dolby Atmos Music. Unsurprisingly, it’s also compatible with Samsung and Google’s new Eclipsa Audio format.
Another Sonos omission the QS90H offers? A dedicated remote, which looks a lot like Samsung’s latest TV remotes, but with battery power instead of solar/USB-C. It’s mostly redundant between your TV remote and Samsung’s controller app, but it’s nice to have a backup.

The bar’s 7.1.2-inch configuration comprises 13 drivers, including nine “full-range” drivers across the left, right, and center channels, dual side-firing channels, and dual upfiring drivers to provide the height element for 3D audio. The final four drivers make up the bar’s Quad Bass Woofer system, which faces two drivers upward and two downward, designed for balanced and powerful bass down to a claimed 38Hz. It can’t replace a full subwoofer, and the bar steps lightly into that register at best, but it’s enough to anchor the rest of the sound for serious punch.
Like previous Samsung models, the QS90H can be turned on its front for wall-mounting, using an internal gyroscope to reroute the primary sound to the top speakers. I wasn’t able to test this feature at home, but it’s a cool option, though I’d be surprised if you don’t lose at least a little fidelity.
Samsung supplements its physical hardware with plenty of digital trickery, starting with its “AI Adaptive Sound” mode, designed to automatically pick the proper sound format based on your source. While the “AI” part is new(ish), Adaptive Sound has long provided an effective set-it-and-forget-it setting for most content. That pairs with Samsung’s Space Fit Pro sound analyzer, designed to adapt the sound to your room for limited but noticeable tightening of detail, though it also tends to sharpen the sound signature.
Other digital settings include Sound Elevation, which effectively raises the soundstage to feel more even with your TV screen, Voice Amplifier Pro, which gets a little too bright for my taste and proved unnecessary, and a Night Mode for lowering bass in the wee hours.

Connecting the QS90H is as easy as you’d expect from a modern premium soundbar, with most folks able to simply connect the HDMI eARC port to their TV’s corresponding port with the included cable for full-bandwidth audio. Older TVs with HDMI ARC only will compress the sound, and some may require you to engage HDMI CEC to use your TV remote for basic controls.
For network connection, you’ll be prompted to download the new Samsung Sound app. I was initially annoyed at the need to download yet another dedicated Samsung app, but the bar connected quickly and the app’s layout and design are much friendlier than the broader Samsung SmartThings app.
As I expected, the QS90H automatically chose Samsung’s Q-Symphony mode when connecting to my review TV, designed to combine the S90H and soundbar in concert for bigger, more directional surround sound. No offense to the 2.1-channel system in Samsung’s slimline OLED (actually, some offense), but the sound was much better when I pulled the TV out of the chain. On the other hand, when I dropped the HDMI cable and connected to the TV wirelessly, I was pleased to find no major loss in fidelity, providing a clean way to lose a cable.
As for the app, it’s responsive and relatively intuitive, laying out nearly everything on the main page for quick access to settings like EQ, sound modes, woofer and channel levels, and add-on speakers like Samsung’s SWA-9500S wireless surrounds ($297.99). If you want to go more hands-on, the Standard sound mode provides a full multi-band EQ rather than just treble and bass, though it didn’t sound as clear to me by default.
The app is also helpful for streaming, though not in the same way as Sonos’ app and its 100+ built-in streaming services. Instead, Samsung simply points you to a few suggested services for streaming directly, like Spotify Connect. However, as I’ve noticed in other soundbars like Samsung’s own HW-Q990H ($1,997.99), changing volume within Spotify awkwardly moves the level multiple notches per tap, forcing me to go back to the Samsung app or remote for more precise control. It’s an annoying quirk, but not uncommon.

I knew Samsung’s new bar had something cooking when its sweeping, theatrical soundstage repeatedly drew my attention away from its sister model OLED, a fantastic performer in its own right. From crashing ocean tides and thunderous symphonic backing tracks of nature shows like Netflix’s Our Planet to the haunting dialogue and bellowing muscle cars of Mad Max: Fury Road, I was increasingly distracted and drawn to the sound behind the sights.
In many ways, the QS90H reminds me of a dressed-down version of one of my favorite standalone soundbars ever, the now-decommissioned Sony HT-A7000. The QS90H doesn’t offer the same level of near-holographic virtual surround, and it doesn’t sound quite as big either, but like Sony’s bar, it does a great job focusing on fundamental bass. The Quad Bass’ potency anchors the rest of the sound for a pulse-raising experience with your best content. Just as impressively, it does for much less than the A7000’s original $1,300 list price.
The QS90H does a fine job with regular fare like sitcoms and light dramas, with upfront dialogue even in muddled scenes, and often with some solid definition. It can sometimes sound thin, but details like the click of a gun or a creaking door pop out for a major upgrade over regular TV sound.
The QS90H is at its best when barreling through sweeping effects across the front of its soundstage with well-mixed films and TV shows. Bombastic soundtracks like the pumping percussion, flashy brass, and crunching car crashes in Sean Mendes’ Skyfall pull you in with a theatrical wall of sound. The depth and immersion increase further with Dolby Atmos content. Going back to Netflix’s Our Planet, scenes like the convergence of a pod of humpback whales provide palpable intensity as the giant sea creatures rise and crash with their massive dripping jaws slamming shut.

Testing more primed Atmos content like the “Amaze” scene from Dolby’s demo test disc, the QS90H effectively immerses you in jungle insects at the intro, while the storm scene brings some raucous thunder and a well-defined crescendo of rain overhead. The soundbar feels closer to cheaper systems like Klipsch’s Core 200 than the Arc Ultra here, with scenes like a bird flying behind you or the swirling vacuum in Marvel’s Ant-Man offering more dimensionality from Sonos’ model. Still, there’s enough to feel the hemispheric expansion that makes 3D audio so exciting, including the occasional “brush past your face” effect, and the hearty bass response helps elevate the other elements for a fun ride.
When it comes to music, the QS90H provides a pleasing presentation, led by its forward bass and solid clarity up top. Acoustic guitars have a warm, natural tone, while horns and strings come through with pleasing fluidity. Piano and vocals carry convincing presence. Instruments like a tight snare and trap set come through cleanly, and pad instruments spread out nicely across the bar’s wide frame, though particularly bright instruments sometimes sound brittle. You’ll find better overall instrumental definition in speakers like Denon’s Home 400, but the QS90H does about as well as I’d expect from its thin profile.
Dipping into some Dolby Atmos Music over AirPlay from Amazon Music Unlimited opened up the soundstage significantly. While most tracks are primarily confined to the front of the room, there’s expansive spacing, including some subtle effects that seem to slip toward your ears in tracks like Elton John’s “Goodbye, Yellow Brick Road” and George Harrison’s “My Sweet Lord.” John Batiste’s “Freedom” sounds fuller in Atmos, with some nuanced spherical effects and better spacing than the stereo version. Like much of the QS90H’s performance, the song leans foremost on its full and musical bass for an impressive listen.
Samsung’s latest all-in-one Dolby Atmos bar won’t replace Sonos at the top of the heap, and its 3D audio effects are middle of the pack for its price, but its mix of heart-pounding bass and versatile features makes it an excellent new option, especially for Samsung TV owners. It also offers some traditional features Sonos and other rivals lack, like full DTS support, a spare HDMI input, and a dedicated remote.
Not for nothing, the QS90H’s $1,000 list price is likely to come down quickly, helping it undercut Sonos, Bose, and several others. In fact, as I write this, the QS90H is already on sale for $800, making it a serious value. Those looking for a slim and powerful one-piece Dolby Atmos system to pair with a newer Samsung TV, or simply to upgrade their aging TV audio setup, will find a game companion in the QS90H.
★★★★★★★★★★ Performance
★★★★★★★★★★ Usability
★★★★★★★★★★ Build Quality
★★★★★★★★★★ Value
A new backdoor dubbed Mistic has been observed in financially motivated attacks targeting organizations in the insurance, education, IT, and professional services sectors.
The malware is believed to be linked to KongTuke/Woodgnat, an initial access broker active since at least 2024 that specializes in compromising corporate networks and selling that access to ransomware groups, including Qilin, Interlock, Rhysida, Akira, 8Base, and Black Basta.
Researchers at cybersecurity company Symantec say that Mistic has been used in intrusions since April.
In at least one incident, it was deployed shortly after ModeloRAT, a backdoor attributed to KongTuke and delivered via social engineering attacks over Microsoft Teams.
Symantec believes that Mistic is a newly developed, stealthy backdoor designed for long-term persistence in compromised networks.
In the attacks investigated by Symantec, the infection started with the launch of the legitimate executable MpExtMs.exe to side-load a malicious DLL named version.dll, which acts as the loader of Mistic (EndpointDlp.dll).
The researchers note that the filename chosen for Mistic resembles Microsoft endpoint security tooling, which may help the malware blend in with trusted software on the host.
A separate .NET DLL is also loaded, which displays a fake login screen to the victim to steal their account credentials.
Once loaded, Mistic communicates with its command-and-control infrastructure and can receive commands from the operator. Symantec lists the following capabilities:
According to Symantec’s analysis, Mistic appears to have been designed for stealth, enabling attackers to maintain a persistent foothold within compromised networks over extended periods.
“The backdoor runs payloads in memory with no file written to disk and includes a kill switch that lets it delete itself, which are features consistent with an operator seeking long-term, low-visibility access,” the researchers say.
Symantec does not provide details on how the infection begins, but KongTuke has been known to use ClickFix, and its FileFix and CrashFix variants, since early 2025 to deliver the ModeloRAT malware.
In a technical report this week, cloud security company Zscaler notes that Mistic, which it tracks as MTLBackdoor, was delivered as a payload in a multi-stage ClickFix infection chain in May.
Zscaler researchers say that “one of the most powerful features [in MTLBackdoor] is the ability to load Beacon Object Files (BOFs) to expand its capabilities.”
BOFs are small programs in C that can execute directly in the memory of a command-and-control (C2) process, leaving no footprint on the disk and evading detection of security agents. They are common in red team products, such as Cobalt Strike, for the post-exploitation stage.
Symantec believes that Mistic confirms the observed trend of custom tools being used in ransomware attacks, although the backdoor appears to have been developed by an initial access broker closely connected to the ransomware scene.
KongTuke is known to use multiple other tools, such as the legitimate WinPython and Node.js runtimes to execute malicious code, finger.exe to retrieve obfuscated payloads, the fake NexShield browser extension, the encrypted GateKeeper .NET payload, and the MintsLoader and D3F@ck Loader malware loaders to deliver additional payloads.
Both Zscaler and Symantec reports [1, 2] provide indicators of compromise for the Mistic/MTLBackdoor malware and note that it is a stealthy tool that can expand its functionality.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Weekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
Renter of Home in Anne Heche Crash Denies Settlement With Son
Microsoft accidentally kills epic Outlook email threads
Two goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
Soccer-U.S. defends Iran World Cup travel restrictions, says discussions ongoing
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
BBC Reporter Discusses Cross Party Criticism Of Trumps Iran Deal
Securitize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
Wall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
Andy Burnham and the meaning of Makerfield
AWS enters the context layer race with a graph that learns from agents, not manual curation
Can Charles Hoskinson Really Rescue Cardano?
HIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
Keir Starmer Allies Question His Chances For No 10
Jake Chervinsky accuses CME of protecting derivatives monopoly
Nearly 7,000 fake Amazon domains registered ahead of Prime Day 2026, researchers warn
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker says AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’ and calls Copilot agents a backdoor
Brexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests
FIFA World Cup 2026: Canada beat 9-men Qatar 6-0 to register first ever win | FIFA World Cup 2026
You must be logged in to post a comment Login