Connect with us

Tech

US appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply chain risk label on Anthropic

Published

on

A US appeals court has upheld the Pentagon’s decision to label Anthropic a supply chain risk. The label bars the military and its contractors from using Anthropic’s Claude models. In a 2-1 ruling on Friday, the DC Circuit court of appeals denied Anthropic’s petitions to overturn the designation.

Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas wrote the opinion, joined by Circuit Judge Neomi Rao. Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson dissented. Anthropic said it disagreed with the decision, CNBC’s Ashley Capoot reported.

“We remain confident in our position and are considering all options, including further review,” an Anthropic spokesperson told CNBC.

What the court decided

The Department of War, as the administration now calls the Pentagon, acted under a 2018 supply chain security law. Anthropic had refused to relax contract terms on Claude, the opinion says. Those terms barred its use for lethal autonomous warfare or domestic surveillance.

Anthropic argued that the exclusion was arbitrary, not allowed by the law and unconstitutional. The court rejected all three arguments.

Advertisement

“The Department had ample support for its conclusion that the continued integration of Claude into the Department’s information systems, by the Department or its contractors, presented a statutorily covered national-security risk,” Katsas wrote.

Anthropic builds restrictions into Claude that stop it from doing tasks the company wants to prevent, the court noted. Those restrictions had more than once stopped Claude from doing tasks government users asked for. A dispute also arose over whether the contract barred Claude’s use in an ongoing overseas military operation, the opinion says.

On free speech, the court found that the Pentagon had acted over a contract term it saw as essential. Anthropic had refused to accept it. The Pentagon had not acted over the company’s support for more government regulation of AI, the judges wrote. Anthropic had also received prompt notice and a fair chance to contest the exclusion, they found.

“But in our Republic, it is the President and the Secretary of War who must determine how best to balance the competing risks,” the majority wrote.

The dissent

Henderson disagreed on how to read the law. The law covers a supplier that could “sabotage”, “extract data” or “otherwise manipulate” a product. Anthropic read “manipulate” as meaning deliberate, deceptive acts. The majority read it more broadly.

Congress passed the law after warnings that hostile states and other bad actors were getting into federal systems through suppliers, Henderson wrote. That history, she wrote, does not cover a contractor’s “honest and upfront enforcement of restrictions” on how the government uses its product.

Advertisement

Two courts, two answers

The Pentagon labelled Anthropic a supply chain risk in March, and Anthropic sued the government days later. The Pentagon relied on two separate designations, so the case ran in two courts, CNBC reported.

In August, a federal judge in San Francisco struck down the other designation. Friday’s ruling leaves the second one in place.

“Another federal court has already held the government’s parallel designation unlawful,” the Anthropic spokesperson said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

The Tech Drop: The most exciting new gadgets you might have missed in September

Published

on

September brought with it an avalanche of new tech. Between Apple’s Surprise and shine, Meta Connect, IFA and Dyson Unveiled, we were inundated with gadget announcements. If you’ve managed to keep up with it all, well done to you. But for anyone seeking a recap, you’ve come to the right place.

Below, I’ve rounded up all the hottest gadget announcements from September, ready for you to browse. You’ll find the most exciting of the Apple announcements, headed up by the brand’s long-awaited first foldable phone. There’s also Meta’s camera-free smart specs, which may or may not have been created in response to the unwelcome ‘pervert specs’ moniker that’s been circulating of late. Dyson’s first ever toothbrush is there, too, in all it’s wildly over-engineered glory. And that’s just the start of it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

An Imminent Google Satellite Test Is Another Step Toward Data Centers in Space

Published

on

On Oct. 1, Google plans to hitch a ride on a SpaceX Transporter 18 rideshare flight, entrusting the mission with a test satellite it hopes will prove durable enough to start doing some light AI work while orbiting in space.

This isn’t exactly putting a data center in space — a much-hyped concept that AI entrepreneurs like Elon Musk have been touting over the last year —but it’s not not doing that. The satellite, which The New York Times reports is called “MWP” and which it describes as about the size of a refrigerator, won’t be running any huge medical research studies or beaming back streaming data. It will be low-powered, running off solar power, and designed just to test the concept of AI computation in space. Google is running the test in partnership with the satellite imaging company Planet and as part of Google’s Project Suncatcher initiative, which was announced late last year.

In a blog post that includes videos showing some of the preparation Google’s research teams have done — such as making sure that TPUs (a type of AI chip) can withstand the vibration of launching into space — the company characterizes this test as a small early step in a long-term moonshot: “exploring whether space could one day host scalable machine learning infrastructure.”

In a post on X, Google CEO asked, “Can our TPUs survive and operate in space? Well, we’re going to find out.”

Advertisement

Finding energy for AI in space

Google explained in the post that one reason it’s going to try crunching AI data in space involves energy. Satellites can access eight times more solar power than earthbound structures, providing a potentially huge energy resource for space data centers, which could bypass the backlash facing data centers across the country.

Advertisement

“Eventually,” writes Travis Beals, Google’s senior director for Paradigms of Intelligence, “it could be possible to link together multiple constellations of satellites, allowing them to manage larger AI workloads while in orbit.”

But that could be easier said than done. Companies like Google, SpaceXAI and Nvidia are all looking to deploy their AI technology beyond the Earth’s surface, but face some basic physical challenges: Any data center satellites would need to be built to withstand radiation, extreme temperatures and the physical stress of getting there. They’d also need to avoid dangers from an increasingly crowded orbital sky filled with other satellites and debris.

Google seems to be moving fast, with plans to continue advancing Project Suncatcher with some tangible results in the next few years; that’s assuming its October test is successful, and things keep moving forward. One of its next milestone goals, for 2027, would be to start testing high-bandwidth laser links after launching two more AI satellites with Planet. Communicating with lasers, Beals said in his Google post, is a lot harder than it sounds. “Maintaining the necessary connection requires extraordinary precision, similar to hitting a coin-size target from miles away while both points are in motion,” he said.

A data center backlash solution?

One reason space data centers sound so attractive to tech companies is a massive public backlash against building new data centers or completing ones that are in the process of being built. A pro-data center PR campaign backed by tech giants may not be enough to counter negative sentiment and protests aimed at data centers that help enable data-hungry AI technology.

Advertisement

Protests have sprung up across the country over energy and water use, pollution and the potential physical effects on those who live near data centers, among other issues. It could also be a point of voter discontent heading into this year’s midterm elections.

Putting data centers in space, presumably, could sidestep the issue of communities not wanting data centers nearby. But it will be costly, and there’s no guarantee that the business model of data centers in space will pay off enough for tech companies to make it viable, said Mahdi Eslamimehr, executive vice president at Quandary Peak Research.

“Proving that chips work in orbit is not proving a business model,” Eslamimehr said, and it won’t lower anyone’s electricity or water bills anytime soon or replace current data center projects, even if the business of data in space proves workable. “I welcome the experiments, but I expect everyday AI services to remain overwhelmingly dependent on terrestrial facilities in 2027 and 2028,” he said.

“A promise about 2035 does not pay an electricity bill in 2026,” he said.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

ProfessorBoots 3D Printed FPV Excavator Puts You Straight in the Operator Seat

Published

on

3D-Printed FPV Excavator Camera
ProfessorBoots has tons of experience 3D-printing remote excavators that can climb boxes, scoop dirt, and crush cans. His latest version parks a three-axis camera in the cab and wires a chair that copies the layout of a full size machine, so a look to the left turns the camera left and a pair of pedals drive the tracks. The result is a backyard digger you operate as if you were sitting in a Caterpillar, only without diesel and without twenty acres.



CADDXFPV sent him a GM3 combo in February, a 46-gram gimbal that tracked head movements using Avatar HD goggles and held a 19-millimeter camera by pitch, roll, and yaw. He installed the first unit on a wheel loader and tested the Goggles L, which cost $199. At first, gazing around simply turning his head seemed bizarre in the greatest possible ways. The articulated steering on that loader shifted the vision in ways that his head did not, and the original cab simply would not fit over the camera. He let the idea lay for a time until that larger, tougher excavator was ready.

Sale


Bambu Lab A1 mini 3D Printer + LED Lamp Kit, Ready-to-Use for Beginners
  • A1 mini + LED Lamp Kit for Creative Light Projects: Bring your ideas to life with the included LED Lamp Kit. Simply print compatible lamp models and…
  • The Perfect 3D Printer for Beginners: A1 mini 3D Printer is designed to make 3D printing easy from day one with automatic calibration, simple setup…
  • Experience the Bambu Lab Ecosystem: Access MakerWorld’s huge library of ready-to-print models, manage prints through the Bambu Handy app, and enjoy…

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
Fitting the gimbal required a significant expansion of the cab. He imported the camera model into CAD, cloned the previous cab, removed the most of the floor, and created a new frame with a hint of design. Because the video transmitter warms up enough to potentially burn skin, he added a printed enclosure to keep a fan above it rather than beneath the lens. An aesthetic bar across the front was supposed to clip the camera when tilted, but it didn’t work out, so he ripped it out, checked clearance, and reprinted the part. The FPV gear draws power from the same battery as the excavator and operates independently, thus the same camera works on both the ESP32-robotic and the conventional radio versions.

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
First-person view made some jobs much easier, like being able to glance down and see the pins instead of guessing from across the yard while coupling a bucket or thumb certainly sped things up. In reality, he drove the machine to a neighbor’s card shop with a $10 payment and a handwritten message simply because he could. Nobody answered the door on his first visit, but a later knock ultimately got him in. Many RC builders do not get to compose sentences like this.

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
Even with the handheld transmitter, he felt like he was playing with a toy. He desired swing and dipper on the left stick, boom, bucket, and thumb on the right, and footprints on his feet. Early on in the project, two ESP32 boards communicating via ESP-NOW accomplished this without the need to hack open a radio. Early joysticks were simply assembled from a game controller with some printed extensions and springs purchased from Harbor Freight. The joysticks were dead in the middle, making fine motions clumsy, and the springs were simply too soft overall. He rebuilt the sticks with 10K potentiometers and bearings, superglued down the handles, and replaced the soft springs with firmer ones. The code now samples the resting point at boot-up and sets it as the center, so worn pots and printed parts that shift slightly over time do not cause problems.

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
Pedals began with a basic potentiometer pivot that allowed for proportional speed control. What happened next was a bit of a hack: both feet lifted the entire base off the ground. Then he added a printed lock, moved the spring supports further out to enhance resistance, and replaced the soldered wires with tidy plugs, allowing the entire pedal unit to be easily removed from the chair. It turns out that the signal dropouts he was seeing were caused by a residual board setting from the Bluepad32 days. Swapping the sketch to a standard ESP32 development board significantly reduced the lag. Later, a small custom PCB arrived and resolved the tangled wiring by mounting everything on neatly organized terminal blocks. He also added a fuse, battery mounts, and a power switch to prevent anything from being soldered directly to the chip.

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
The chair’s PLA began warping in the summer heat, pulling a spring plate completely out of shape. So he recreated the chair pieces in PETG but preserved the existing pots and bearings. Not long after, he created a desk-mounted version with the same controls, but without the office chair. Yeah, it turns out you can build the entire thing for about $60, assuming you already have an excavator and a chair. To be honest, he prefers the cheaper Goggles L more than the costly pair he purchased later. The pricey ones leaked light and required some printed shims to fix.

3D-Printed Excavator Camera
The ESP-NOW has a somewhat lesser range than a typical radio, but it nevertheless managed to control the machine in the yard from indoors. The problem was that it only worked for about thirty minutes before becoming clogged with dirt. His brother tested the chair and reported that it felt similar to a real excavator. Later, he used the same goggles to check under a porch to see if a neighbor’s cat was hiding; he had to tape a headlamp to the goggles to get a good look. Voltage sag killed the feed on the first pass, however fresh batteries fixed it no trouble. Unfortunately, that particular location wound up on a shortlist alongside crawl spaces and wasp nests.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Meta’s newest AI features aren’t here yet, but you can try them early

Published

on

Meta showed off a bunch of new things coming to Muse at Connect 2026 earlier this week. If some of those features caught your attention, you might not have to wait for the wider rollout to try them. Meta has opened an early access program for upcoming Muse features, and signing up is very simple. All you need to do is ask Muse.

The company shared a prompt on X that users can send directly to the AI assistant: “Can you let the Muse team know I want to be part of the Muse early access program?” Send that message, and the team will receive your interest in joining the program. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll immediately get every new Muse feature Meta is developing. But it does put you in line to potentially try some of them before they’re released more widely.

There’s a lot coming to Muse

The timing makes sense, given just how much was announced at Connect. One of the more unusual additions is a digital avatar, which will let you have an actual video conversation with the AI instead of being limited to text or voice. But the bigger changes are about what it can do for you. More shopping partners and connectors are on the way, while the Mac app will soon be able to interact with your computer and complete tasks on your behalf. The idea is to make the assistant feel like something you can give a job to and leave it.

And you won’t necessarily need your phone or computer to use it, either. Muse is also headed to Meta’s AI glasses, where a wake word will be enough to get its attention before giving it a command. Put it all together, and it’s a pretty substantial expansion for an AI assistant that only arrived earlier this month.

Meta wants the AI crowd to try it first

Early access programs are nothing new. What makes this one a little more interesting is who Meta seems to be looking for. Instead of testing these features with a random group of people, the company is inviting users to put their hands up themselves. That naturally attracts people who are already curious about AI, probably use several different assistants, and have a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn’t.

Advertisement

That could be particularly useful when you’re trying to catch up in an increasingly crowded space. We’ve already seen how Muse compares with ChatGPT and Gemini in areas like AI image generation. Getting upcoming features in front of that same AI-savvy crowd could give the team genuinely useful feedback before everyone else gets them. And if you happen to be part of that crowd, there’s no complicated sign-up process to worry about. All you have to do is ask.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Quad Platina Review – Trusted Reviews

Published

on

Verdict

The Platina shuns the comforting retro aesthetic of some other Quad devices to encase an amplifier that combines clean, modern looks with an absolutely up to the minute spec and genuinely superb performance. It’s not cheap but it’s worth every penny. This is a spectacular amplifier and one that has to be on any shortlist at the price point

  • Sounds superb with huge reserves of power

  • Excellent connectivity

  • Beautifully made and finished

  • No on board streaming or EQ

  • No direct input selection

  • Quite big

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £3500

  • Power

    Advertisement

    200 watt amplifier

  • Connections

    Advertisement

    Selection of analogue and digital inputs

  • TV

    Advertisement

    HDMI eARC connection to a TV

  • Turntable

    Advertisement

    MM/MC Phono stage

Introduction

Hi-Fi is an industry with a strong line in long running and iconic companies but, even in this context, Quad stands out. One of the genuine ‘in at the ground floor’ home hi-fi brands, their output includes an impressive number of innovative and iconic products.

As you might expect, when you have a heritage like that, the temptation to show it off is quite a strong one. When I looked at the Quad 3 recently, it fairly drips with details that speak to Quad’s huge heritage.

Advertisement

What you see here isn’t that. The Platina range has been designed and styled to remind everyone that Quad knows their way around state of the art perfectly well thank you very much. As well as those tidy and elegant lines, it boasts a specification that is both bang up to date and looks pretty impressive, even judged at the Platina’s asking price. 

Of course, Quad is the only company trying to entice you to buy a well specified and very powerful integrated amp so we need to see if, once you peel the retro away, if Quad can deliver the sort of sonic experience required to make you want to part with your hard earned cash.

Advertisement

Price

The Quad is available in the UK for £3,500. It is sold through a significant spread of retailers and there is the option to buy it online should you choose to. In the USA, it can be had for $5,495. In Australia it costs $7,999 AUD.

Advertisement

The amp has launched at the same time as a matching streamer (the Platina Stream) and will be joined in time by a matching CD transport as well. If you like the look of the Platina Amo, you can have a whole stack of equally sleek looking devices to go with it.

Design

  • Sleek, clean and modern…
  • …and bigger than you think
  • Excellent display and menu system
  • No direct input selection though

The Platina is in direct contrast the Quad 3 I looked at recently. It looks absolutely up to date and it does so in an understated but very appealing way. Nothing about the Platina shouts at you to grab your attention but the more time you spend with it, the more it appeals.

The standard of build and finish is genuinely outstanding and it’s delivered in a way that is wonderfully understated. It’s a device that sits there being utterly and compellingly unobtrusive but you, the owner, the person who interacts with it, gets to remember how special it actually is.

Advertisement

Quad Platina displayQuad Platina display
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It also looks modern but keeps some lovely little touches from previous Quad models. That long standby button is a nod to the 99 Series components that were produced at the turn of the century and other detailed aspects hark back to then as well. 

It’s cleverly done because if you don’t give a monkeys about any of this, it isn’t overt, just there if you know. One of the more surprising parts of the Platina is that it’s quite a bit larger than you might expect. It looks quite compact but it’s actually 445mm wide. Combined with the beefy 17 kilo weight, it’s a more imposing thing than the pictures might suggest.

Advertisement

At the front of the Platina, you’ll find a display and menu system. The interface that the Platina uses feels like a step forward over anything I’ve tested from IAG with a similar setup.

Quad Platina display detailQuad Platina display detail
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It’s slicker and more intuitive and it encourages you to adjust things to see what the effect they have. Such is the amount of things that the Platina does, it could have wound up feeling a bit daunting but the business of deciding how sensitive you want the digital inputs to be or whether you want to trim the level of different inputs so they have the same output volume can all be done very easily.

Advertisement

Not everything is quite so perfect though. As I shall cover, the Platina has plenty of inputs; ten of them in fact. These can be accessed by the remote control and front panel but they can’t be accessed directly. Depending on the connections you wind up using, you might find your inputs are an irritating distance apart on the cycle.

Quad Platina remote controlQuad Platina remote control
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Specification

  • 200 watts into 8 ohms
  • Sophisticated digital board but no Bluetooth
  • Balanced and unbalanced analogue connections
  • Clever phono stage and potent headphone out.

Beneath the simple good looks of the Platina lurks a serious amplifier. How serious you ask? Well, it disposes of no less than 200 watts into 8 ohms which is a pretty serious number. This increases to 300 watts into 4 ohms and the circuit can deliver a peak current of 20 amps. In terms of old fashioned Class AB power, this is a lot.

There’s more to this amp than brute force too. It’s a dual mono configuration device built around a 630VA toroidal transformer that was specially designed for the Platina Integrated.

Advertisement
Quad Platina chassisQuad Platina chassis
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

This combines a large filter capacity in the power supply (44,000uF per channel) with cascaded voltage regulators. In the output stage it has bespoke capacitors developed in collaboration with Wurth Elektronik. It’s also fully balanced from the front to the back, with Quad going to the effort of fitting a four channel rotary encoder for the volume as it simplifies the process of keeping the signal balanced throughout.

This balanced design is of more than abstract interest too. The digital input section of the Quad uses an ESS ES9038PRO DAC chip as the basis for this. This is an eight channel DAC, it is run in dual differential mode to try and eliminate errors that creep in (by checking the two streams against each other) and still allow for a balanced output to be sent to the preamp. When you consider the Platina’s specification it effectively means that every single digital input as a balanced source for that balanced amplifier.

Quad Platina connectionQuad Platina connection
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

There are two optical and two coaxial inputs supporting a USB audio input on a USB-C connection and an HDMI eARC input. Something that’s genuinely unusual is that there is both an optical and coaxial output on the back as as well. I genuinely cannot remember the last time I saw this so if you need such a thing, the Platina might suddenly shoot up your shortlist. 

The USB input can handle PCM to 768kHz and DSD512 with the other inputs topping out at 192kHz. Something that is mildly interesting is that Bluetooth is not present on the Platina which is logical to a point but I’m sure at least one would-be owner will miss it.

Something to bear in mind here is that, while this is a potent and capable piece of decoding hardware, it is not a self-contained solution. The Platina has no streaming module on board so, even though it can do the decoding, it still needs something to send it the signal in the first place.

Advertisement

Advertisement

I don’t doubt that the matching Platina Stream will be a superb device but at £3,000 it’s a pricey addition. Like the issue with Cambridge’s EXA and EXN100, the streamer feels over specc’d for a device partnering an amp with a digital board as good as this one but you are going to need something.

Quad Platina more connectionsQuad Platina more connections
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The analogue section of the Quad is usefully comprehensive too. A single XLR input is supported by a pair of RCA connections and there are matching XLR and RCA outputs that can be selected as pre-outs or tape loops depending on your requirements.

Don’t go thinking you’ll need to use one of these inputs for a phono stage either because the Platina has one and very comprehensive it is too. It’s a JFET (junction field-effect transistor) based phono stage that supports moving magnet and moving coil operation.

It can have its gain adjusted through three different settings, with impedance settings for moving magnet and moving coil models. Internal MC phono stages are rare things on integrated amplifiers and ones with adjustment are rarer still which puts the Platina in a very select group of devices. 

Advertisement

As a final extra ribbon to an already fairly enticing bow, the Quad has a dedicated headphone amp that outputs via a 6.35mm socket. It’s a slight shame you can’t have a balanced out too but this is realistically not the end of the world.

Advertisement

Performance

  • Effortlessly powerful
  • Genuinely superb bass
  • Excellent levels of tonal realism from all inputs
  • Phono stage performance is excellent
  • Fine partner for TV work- once the CEC is switched on

Sometimes, we can get a bit lost in abstract power figures. It’s all very well me telling you that that the Quad spits out 200 watts and does so with next to no distortion but what does that mean in reality?

What it means is that the Quad can drive pretty much any speaker it’s likely to encounter to pretty much any level you fancy. You’ll need to be careful with the levels too. When we hear something as ‘loud’, a lot of those triggers are created by distortion.

As the Quad doesn’t do very much of that, you can sit there having a whale of a time and only realise quite how loud things are when someone comes in the room to sternly tell you quite how loud it is.

Advertisement
Quad Platina dialQuad Platina dial

I’m not done there either. For most of the time testing the Platina, I have used a pair of Focal Kanta No1 standmount spekers. These are talented and exceptionally revealing; excellent for showing what an amp is doing right and wrong but they can often feel a little bit lacking in the bass department.

Advertisement

Run Leftfield’s wonderful Space Shanty through them with the Quad delivering the power and this perception rapidly vanishes. The Quad combines its power with superb current delivery to extract truly sensational low end from the Kanta No1.

It’s not simple brute force either. Listening to the stunning (if incredibly bleak) The Greener Pasture by Peter Oren sees the Quad deliver a superb performance. Oren’s deep, almost funereal vocals, have a richness and presence that grab and hold your attention.

The sparse instruments and guitar that supports him through the title track are completely convincing. The clever part of this for me is that trying to work out where the digital ends and the analogue begins is extremely tricky because it is so tonally even and cohesive.

Advertisement

Something else I’ve come to hugely admire about the Quad is that when you give it rather more rough and ready recording, there is enough overall forgiveness to ensure that you can continue to wind the level on and enjoy yourself.

You can listen to Placebo’s Meds, specifically the track Infra Red; a track almost broken by the amount of compression applied to it and the Platina manages to not only make it listenable but get to the actual (brilliant) musical core of things. If your collection includes some less than stellar recordings, this is an amp that should keep you listening to them.

Quad Platina build qualityQuad Platina build quality
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

The phono stage is very impressive too. While I don’t feel that ‘60dB’ on the Quad’s menu is quite the same as 60dB from the external phono stages here, when you combine it with that herculean power output, there is enough headroom.

It means that listening to the dense and atmospheric Electric War by Little Barrie is engaging and wholly convincing, unpicking the arrangements so you can follow them better without losing their character. So long as you don’t have a cartridge with really unusual impedance numbers, this is more than a convenience solution.

Advertisement

I’ve also really enjoyed using the Quad with my TV as well. So long as you have remembered that you need to switch the CEC function (that allows it to turn on and off with the screen) on manually, it’s a big, confident and effortless partner for whatever you choose to watch.

I ploughed through a couple of episodes of The X Files for nostalgia’s sake and was consistently impressed by how it fixed dialogue on screen while expanding effects beyond it. What is genuinely impressive about how this fits into the wider spec of the Quad. It feels like a natural extension of what the Platina is designed to do rather than a bolted on extra to tick a feature box on the website.

Should you buy it?

The fundamental quality of the Platina is easy to see. This is a powerful, superbly specc’d and wonderfully musical amplifier that is very hard to rival under five grand. It has connections for days and does justice to all of them. It’s not cheap but it’s still excellent value.

Advertisement

At the price that the Platina is sold for, some rivals from companies like Arcam and NAD are offering the means to work without source equipment at all which, if you don’t have any source equipment already could be very appealing. They also have niceties like room correction which the Quad does without.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

What really makes the Quad shine is the strength in depth. It does a huge amount of things but, more importantly, there’s barely a hint of weakness to any of those features.
 
Often a product recommendation will state that the product is suited to a specific use case as one aspect of the spec is clearly better than the other parts. Here, the Quad can slot into a variety of different system types and go on to excel in all of them. There are no caveats in the Platina’s specification.

How We Test

We test every amplifier we review thoroughly over an extended period of time.

We use industry standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Advertisement

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

  • Tested for several days
  • Tested with real world use

Full Specs

  Quad Platina Review
Manufacturer Quad
Size (Dimensions) 445 x 348 x MM
Weight 17.1 KG
DAC ESS ES9038Pro
Integrated Phono Stage Yes
Release Date 2025
Amplifier Type Integrated
Frequency Range – Hz
Amplification Class AB
Remote Control Yes
Inputs Two balanced XLR, two RCA, MM/MC phono, two optical, two SPDIF, USB, HDMI ARC
Outputs RCA, Stereo pair, XLR, optical, coaxial, 12V trigger
UK RRP £3500
USA RRP $5495
AUD RRP AU$7999

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Databricks buys Row Zero to bring governed spreadsheets to Genie

Published

on

Databricks has acquired Row Zero, bringing a governed, live-data spreadsheet into Genie just weeks after the company’s valuation hit $190bn.

San Francisco’s Databricks has acquired Row Zero, a spreadsheet tool built to connect business teams’ spreadsheets directly to live, governed data in a move to expand the capabilities of Genie, its AI coworker product. No financial details have been disclosed.

The deal will give Genie a native spreadsheet interface, letting users explore data, model scenarios and collaborate directly inside a familiar, Excel- and Google Sheets-like environment. Unlike a typical spreadsheet, Row Zero – which was founded by former AWS and Tableau engineers – connects to live, governed data sources, with queries honouring each user’s permissions and every interaction auditable, according to Databricks.

The company said the acquisition addresses what it called “spreadmarts” – ungoverned spreadsheet files that teams have long relied on to store or share data – which it argues create security and governance gaps as businesses deploy AI agents on sensitive company data.

Advertisement

“As more finance, operations, and go-to-market teams adopt Genie, incorporating a seamless spreadsheet experience is a must-have,” said Patrick Wendell, co-founder and VP of engineering at Databricks.

“When finance started doing all their work with Genie, we noticed that they were combining Genie with a Live Cloud Spreadsheet called Row Zero,” Databricks CEO and co-founder Ali Ghodsi said in a social media post. “This combination is really powerful. We met the Row Zero team and were blown away.”

Row Zero founder and CEO Breck Fresen said the team built the product because it wanted spreadsheets that could “seamlessly connect to enterprise-scale data with governance and security at the core”.

Row Zero will be available to Databricks customers across all major clouds and will continue to support data sources beyond Databricks’ own platform, the company said.

Advertisement

The acquisition follows a period of rapid growth for Databricks. The company closed a $5bn funding round in August at a $190bn valuation, up from $134bn just six months earlier, with backers including Coatue, Blackstone and MGX.

Founded in 2013, Databricks works with more than 20,000 organisations, including Adidas, AT&T, Bayer, Block, Mastercard and Unilever, and employs more than 500 staff across the UK and Ireland as part of its EMEA operations, headquartered in London.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

3 Tractor Brands Owned By AGCO

Published

on





Conversations about tractors and major agricultural equipment tend to revolve around names like Mahindra, Kubota, and the legendary U.S. brand John Deere. But folks familiar with those companies and other major tractor brands know that AGCO has long been one of the biggest names in the market for agricultural machinery.  

That has been the goal since the company’s founding in 1990, with AGCO bosses purchasing the former Deutz-Allis operation to form an agricultural machinery business primarily focused on putting the needs of farmers first. The company has spent the better part of the past three-plus decades doing just that, with its initial successes helping AGCO transform into a publicly traded entity just a few years after its founding.

Advertisement

As is often the case with large corporations, AGCO’s ascent to its current station in the agricultural arena came about partly through the acquisition and promotion of other companies, with established agricultural tractor operations becoming a big part of its expansion plans. The company has indeed added several brands during its decades-long existence, though some of those deals have, of course, been bigger than others. As far as full-blown tractor brands go, AGCO now counts three among its various holdings, and all of them tend to rank among the major players in the global tractor market. 

Advertisement

Fendt

Fendt tractors tend to be as well-respected in the market as any of the major brands. Like the tractors bearing the logos of major outfits like John Deere, some Fendt rigs have been known to cost a pretty penny at the point of purchase. The German tractor brand has also positioned itself as one of the more innovative outfits in the tractor market.

Fendt has now been a part of that market for the better part of a full century, entering the European agricultural arena in 1930 with the continent’s first 6-horsepower small tractor. Fendt would go on to make quite a name for itself in Europe over the next six decades, and by the mid-1990s, had grown to the point that larger corporations like AGCO were looking to step in and maximize the brand’s market potential. 

AGCO officially acquired the Fendt brand in 1997 by paying out a reported $321 million, $38 million of which was assumed debt from Fendt. By 2026 numbers, that sum equals about $670 million. The purchase was hardly a minor one for AGCO, and marked the second big acquisition by AGCO in the space of just a few years. The Fendt acquisition also helped cement AGCO as an increasingly large player in the agricultural market. Given Fendt’s current status in that market, the investment has arguably paid off well for AGCO.

Advertisement

Massey Ferguson

Much like Fendt, Massey Ferguson is a brand that will need little introduction to folks who spend their days on the farm. The brand has, after all, been around in some capacity since the late 1840s. Since Daniel Massey established his machinery workshop in 1847, the business that would eventually become Massey Ferguson has become one of the go-to brands for farmers across the globe.

Since 1957, Massey Ferguson’s Triple Triangle logo has been a constant and almost instantly recognizable presence in the realm of agricultural machinery. As it happens, that symbol, as well as the brand’s equally recognizable name, has been the property of AGCO since the 1990s.

Advertisement

The company’s acquisition of the Massey Ferguson operation actually predates its Fendt deal by a few years, with AGCO officially closing the deal for MF’s worldwide holdings in 1994. That deal came at a cost of $329 million — or roughly $743 million by 2026 numbers — which AGCO paid to Buffalo, New York’s Varity, along with a reported 500,000 shares of stock. It was easily the biggest deal AGCO made in the early days of its existence. It’s one that continues to prove fruitful for the agricultural company to this day, with Massey Ferguson-branded machines becoming a staple of AGCO’s tractor operation and likely contributing in some capacity to the agricultural company’s $10.1 billion net sales report for 2025.

Advertisement

Valtra

Valtra is, perhaps, the lesser-known of the three tractor brands featured on AGCO’s website. The Finnish company has been making tractors for more than seven decades, however, and can even trace its origins back to the 19th century. In 1979, Valtra’s predecessor, Valmet, also leveled up its presence in the agricultural sector by purchasing Volvo’s tractor operations.

Valtra continued operating under different owners for several decades after that acquisition. By the early 2000s, Valtra had established itself as the preeminent tractor brand in Europe’s Nordic regions and had also become a major presence in Latin American markets. In 2002 alone, Valtra’s net sales were about 762 million euros (around $716 million), and with numbers like that, there was plenty of appeal to a company like AGCO to make a play for the brand.

Said play came in 2004, with AGCO completing its acquisition of Valtra for a total of 600 million Euros. Adjusted for 2026 inflation, that number is just over 966 million Euros. At current exchange rates, it’s a little over $1.1 billion. The acquisition of Valtra clearly marked one of the biggest in AGCO’s history. As Chairman, President, and CEO Robert J. Ratliff noted at the time of the acquisition, the move provided “an unequalled opportunity for AGCO to expand its business in significant global markets,” and the company continues to benefit from Valtra’s international appeal. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

OpenAI’s rogue AI agents crossed another line, this time with US government systems

Published

on

OpenAI’s rogue AI agent problem isn’t slowing down. Just a day after details emerged about one of its agents breaching an Australian government system, we’re learning that US federal agencies are also caught up in the company’s investigation. This follows a controlled cybersecurity test in which OpenAI’s agents escaped and hacked Hugging Face.

OpenAI has acknowledged unusual activity involving its AI agents and websites belonging to the Commerce Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Researchers have also identified an apparent attempt by OpenAI models to access a system belonging to the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. The Education Department attempt was unsuccessful. OpenAI also says the other incidents did not amount to security breaches, and representatives for the agencies involved told The New York Times they had no evidence that nonpublic information was accessed. But what the agents actually did complicates the situation.

OpenAI’s agents went further than intended

According to the company, many of these incidents started with a fairly ordinary task: its AI agents were looking for reliable information on the web. That inevitably led them to government websites, but in some cases, the agents went beyond simply browsing what was publicly available. Take the Census Bureau, for example. An agent found credentials online, used them to query one of its systems, and downloaded data. The information itself was public, but the way the agent accessed it wasn’t exactly what you’d expect from a regular web search. Something similar happened with the SEC, where an agent retrieved publicly available information and posted it to an external online forum without being asked.

The Education Department incident went a step further. Researchers at AI nonprofit Transluce spotted what appeared to be models attempting to break into a website operated by the department’s civil rights office, although the attempt was unsuccessful. Similar activity involved the Chicago mayor’s office, but officials there said only public, non-sensitive information was involved. That’s an important distinction here. There’s currently no evidence that any of these US incidents exposed private government information. But what started as agents looking for information online appears, in some cases, to have turned into them accessing systems or moving data in ways nobody asked them to.

And this comes right after the Australia incident

The timing is hard to ignore. Just days ago, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed that AI agents had breached nonpublic files on a website belonging to the country’s government-run Medicare system. The incident happened months ago, but it has drawn fresh attention to how much has been happening behind the scenes.

Advertisement

And Australia clearly wasn’t an isolated case. Dozens of organizations worldwide have now been notified about potentially problematic agent activity, including governments, universities, and public agencies. That doesn’t mean dozens of systems were hacked. Many incidents were less serious, including what the company describes as agent spam: unexpected behavior such as an agent posting information online when it wasn’t supposed to. In other cases, though, agents went so far as to bypass security controls while looking for information.

The difficult part is that we still don’t know where this list ends. Investigators are working through agent activity month by month, going back to around the time of the Hugging Face hack that surfaced in July. Most of what they’ve found so far has reportedly had little or no meaningful impact, but there is enough to review that the process is expected to take months. Even Sam Altman admits the disclosure process hasn’t moved quickly enough. On Friday, the OpenAI CEO said the company had “not been as fast as we would have liked” and is prioritizing cases based on their severity.

There is an extensive and ongoing review related to our agents’ use of internet access during training and evaluation. We’ve been publishing summaries at the link below and will continue to.

We have not been as fast as we would have liked but we are trying to balance our desire… https://t.co/8zoMxas5Eq

— Sam Altman (@sama) September 25, 2026

And that’s really what makes these latest revelations so interesting. An AI agent pulling public Census data is obviously very different from one getting into nonpublic government files. But we’re now talking about incidents involving government systems in multiple countries, dozens of organizations being contacted, and an investigation that is still uncovering what happened. Two months after the Hugging Face hack first raised the alarm, we still don’t know how far this goes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ireland losing out on future female talent with early workplace exits

Published

on

New research has highlighted how gender-related challenges may be limiting women’s potential for leadership roles in the workplace.

Balance for Better Business (BFBB), a review group for greater equality in the workplace, has today (25 September) published the results of a report exploring how an early exit from the workforce is more common among women than men, often to the detriment of female leadership and the wider ecosystem. 

BFBB’s research found that women aged 50 to 65 are more likely to leave the workforce at an earlier age than their male counterparts, reducing the pool of experienced talent available for senior leadership and board roles.

The ‘Why Women Exit the Workforce Earlier than Men in Later Career Stages: Irish and International Perspective and Policy Recommendations’ report found that a number of issues are arising that are contributing to a rise in women exiting the workforce early. 

Advertisement

Despite Irish women showing higher than average workplace participation rates, the research found that Ireland also has a larger participation gap between men and women aged 55 to 65, when compared to EU figures.  

According to the report: “This gap is particularly significant around the 50-65 age cohort, as it coincides with the period when many professionals are reaching senior executive and board-level positions. As experienced women leave the workforce at greater rates than men, organisations risk losing valuable talent and future leadership candidates.”

Among the challenges were menopause, caregiving responsibilities, burnout, workplace ageism and barriers to career progression.

From challenge to opportunity

The report suggested that there is an opportunity for women to be better supported in the workplace provided there is greater recognition of how the burden of caregiving often falls on women. 

Advertisement

BFBB found that women account for 61pc of unpaid carers in Ireland, with many women, at a later stage of their careers, balancing working alongside caring for children or ageing relatives.

The report said: “Employers should strengthen support for carers through flexible working arrangements, enhanced workplace support and policies that encourage a more balanced sharing of caregiving responsibilities.”

Organisations should also pay greater consideration to the impact of ageism and gender bias in the workplace, as women often find their progression to be limited, increasing the likelihood of a workforce exit. 

Findings from the report indicated that more than 90pc of workers aged over 55 have experienced age-related discrimination. “Organisations should strengthen inclusive leadership practices, address bias in recruitment and promotion processes, and ensure experienced women remain visible, valued and supported to progress.”

Advertisement

The menopause is also creating additional challenges for women in the workplace, with the report regarding menopause as a “significant but often overlooked factor in workforce participation”.

More than one-third of women who contributed their data to the research said that they have considered leaving work due to menopause symptoms, while an additional 9.2pc have already left employment as a result. 

The report said: “Employers should introduce menopause policies, manager training and targeted workplace support to help retain experienced female talent and prevent avoidable exits from the workforce.”

Commenting on the results of the report, Carolan Lennon, the co-chair of Balance for Better Business, said: “This report shines a spotlight on an important but often overlooked challenge. Women in their 50s and early 60s represent a highly experienced and skilled segment of Ireland’s workforce, yet too many continue to encounter barriers that make remaining in employment unnecessarily difficult.

Advertisement

“Retaining experienced women must be a strategic priority. Doing so is not only essential to achieving balanced leadership, but also to strengthening the competitiveness and future growth of Irish businesses. If we want to achieve balanced leadership, we must ensure that women can thrive and progress throughout every stage of their careers.”

Bernard Byrne, also co-chair of Balance for Better Business, added: “The earlier exit of so many women from the workforce has implications far beyond individual organisations. It directly impacts the pools of talent needed to have broad and diverse leadership pipelines.

“This limitation has a direct knock-on impact on the competitiveness of Irish business. The actions identified in this report are practical and can help employers to make a real difference in retaining a balanced talent pool. Businesses that take action today will be better positioned to attract, retain and develop the diverse leadership talent of the future.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Abusing SQL To Play DOOM

Published

on

Most laypeople who encounter SQL think of it purely as a tool for managing large datasets. While that is certainly what it was designed for, SQL is still a programming language at its core. It includes many of the features found in general-purpose languages like C or Python, and although it wasn’t built for general-purpose work, it can handle a surprising range of tasks that programmers might not expect to use it for. To demonstrate its capabilities, and perhaps to show off their skills with SQL, a group at CedarDB ported the original DOOM to this language.

The project stores the WAD data (essentially everything except the engine) in a series of tables, which was fairly straightforward compared to the rest of the project. Where it gets more complicated is managing the timing that ties the game to 35 fps, and of course rendering the images. Their rendering process takes up 1300 lines of SQL across 89 common table expressions (CTEs) which is certainly advanced for this language. The rest of the project is another 4000 lines of SQL, with a bit of Python to handle the keyboard inputs, timing, and display of the generated bitmap.

Perhaps counterintuitively, DOOM might be the perfect game to run on SQL. It was built in an era before dedicated graphics cards and isn’t truly 3D, meaning that the programmers had to do a lot of tricks to get it to look as if it is 3D. This results in a lot of data transformations uniquely suited to SQL. It’s almost like DOOM‘s original renderer was built by someone with extensive SQL knowledge in the first place. For those looking to try this out, the source code for the project is available on a GitHub page, and for some other unique implementations of DOOM there’s also this version built in regular expressions and this one in Microsoft Word.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending