Aiper Scuba V3

MSRP $949.99

Released February 2026

Advertisement

“The Scuba V3 punches above its weight-class with both outstanding performance and value”

Pros

• Lightweight
• Cleans well
• Intuitive app

Cons

• Will not clean the water surface
• Mediocre battery life

Instant Insight 

I have always maintained that owning a pool is like owning a boat – you will spend 90% of your time maintaining and cleaning it and 10% of your time enjoying it, especially if you live in Oregon as I do. Over the years, we have seen robot cleaners evolve from erratic, cord-tangled wall-bumpers to reliable vacuums, and technology keeps getting better, especially in the age of AI. Priced at $1,199 MSRP (with a street price currently around $970 USD), the Aiper Scuba V3 is not trying to be the cheapest impulse buy at the pool store, but instead, positions itself as a premium AI-driven assistant that brings sophisticated navigation of high-end robot vacuums to the bottom of your backyard oasis.  

New for 2026, the Aiper Scuba V3 robotic pool cleaner has new AI features and more value, although it sacrifices some tech to offer such a good value. The Scuba V3 is currently priced between the top-of-the-line Scuba X1 Pro Max ($1699) and the Scuba X1 ($899.99), offering newer AI-focused features for just $70 more. The Scuba V3 is equipped with AI Vision and dToF(Direct Time of Flight) sensors, which give this pool cleaner more of an organized purpose than recklessly bouncing around the pool.  

During my tests, the Scuba V3 proved to be a reliable, hardy worker with long battery life. If you already have a pool cleaner that is a few years old and working great, it’s not worth spending money on the Scuba V3, but if you are in the market, then I would recommend jumping into the pool cleaner ecosystem. Paired with the Aiper EcoSurfer S2 skimmer, both of these devices should do the job in keeping your pool spotlessly clean.  

Aiper V3 Specifications:  

Here is how the Aiper Scuba V3 measures up : 

Design and Weight: Like a paper tank 

Like most pool cleaners on the market, the Scuba V3 uses a tank tread design to move the unit around. And like the rest of the products in the Aiper robot pool cleaner line-up, the casing is made up of a piano black finish that looks high-quality. Rather than the gold or carbon fiber surround found on the more expensive Aiper units, the V3 has some light blue trim, which would indicate more of a value virtue signal. Dimension-wise, the Scuba V3 is considerably smaller than the Scuba X1 or Scuba X1 Pro Max, which are not only taller, longer, and wider, but also considerably heavier.

I put some charts below that show the weight of the Scuba V3 compared to others in its price range – it comes in on the lighter side in the comparison (when not wet), which is nice for those who really have trouble pulling these cleaners out of their pool. Aiper sells a caddie to help you transport their pool cleaners to and from the pool, but would surmise that most people can skip the caddie, as the V3 is pretty light.  

I found that the tank treads did a great job moving the V3 around my pool, and they stuck to the side of the pool without issue, despite a suction lower than that of higher-end models. Underneath, you have four scrubbing brushes – two in the front and two in the back – that do a good job agitating algae, mineral deposits, and debris before the suction kicks in. The debris is funneled into a newly designed 3.5-liter collection basket wrapped in a Micromesh filter.

The overall build quality feels premium; the plastics are thick, the moving parts feel solid, and there are no flimsy latches that feel destined to snap off after a single summer in the sun. I noted in my Beatbot Aquasense 2 Ultra review that they put extra screws and parts in the box, which is a clear sign to me that something is going to wear out. 

The Aiper Scuba V3 is a thoughtful and rugged piece of engineering.  

When you are dealing with robotic pool cleaners, dry weight directly correlates to user experience, specifically, how miserable it is to pull the machine out of the water once it has finished its cleaning cycle. Here is how the competitive landscape breaks down: 

• The Featherweights (Under 20 lbs): The Aiper Scuba V3 (18.1 lbs) and the Dolphin Liberty 400 (17.9 lbs) are the clear winners here. Aiper managed to pack the V3 with a complex AI vision system and heavy-duty tank treads without inflating its mass. It is incredibly easy to retrieve one-handed using the included hook. We also included the corded Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus (20.8 lbs) as a baseline to show that premium cordless tech doesn’t necessarily mean a heavier machine. 

• The Middleweights (23 to 25 lbs): The highly anticipated Beatbot Sora 70 (23.0 lbs) sits right in the middle of the pack. While it is about five pounds heavier than the Scuba V3, that extra weight is justified by its internal buoyancy chambers, which allow it to float up and clean the surface of the water (a feature the V3 lacks). The older Aiper Scuba S1 Pro (25.0 lbs) and Beatbot Aquasense Pro (24.3 lbs) also live in this tier, representing the maximum weight most users can comfortably lift without straining their backs. 

• The Heavyweight (30+ lbs): Aiper’s flagship model, the Scuba X1 Pro Max (33.1 lbs), is an absolute behemoth. While it offers a staggering 5-hour battery life and 8,500 GPH of suction, pulling 33 pounds of dead weight (plus trapped water) out of the deep end is a genuine physical workout. 

Ultimately, the Scuba V3 strikes a near-perfect balance, offering premium AI navigation in a chassis light enough that anyone in the family can confidently deploy and retrieve it. 

Navigation: The most important part of any robot cleaner 

I get asked a lot about what makes these pool cleaners so much better than the other, and the answer is simple: Does it clean the pool to your satisfaction, and is it low maintenance? Sounds simple, but as you know, it’s not that easy. Pools come in a lot of shapes and depths, so to get a pool clean, you need a good brain to tell the cleaner how to navigate (and you need long battery life, too).  

Powered by what Aiper calls its “Cognitive AI Navium Mode” and “VisionPath Adaptive Path Planning,” this robot uses an integrated underwater camera combined with dToF (Direct Time of Flight) optical sensors. Think of dToF as a form of laser radar; it sends out light pulses and measures how long they take to bounce back, creating a highly accurate 3D map of your pool’s interior. When you drop the Scuba V3 into the water, it doesn’t just wander. It assesses the shape of the pool, detects obstacles with its optical sensors, and plans a precise, overlapping, lawnmower-style route. 

But the really cool trick is the “AI Patrol” mode. I actively tested this by tossing a handful of fine potting soil and a few sunken leaves into the deep end. The Scuba V3’s camera has a 2-meter detection range and is trained to recognize over 20 different types of debris. As it cruised nearby, I literally watched the robot alter its path, turn directly toward the dirt pile, and suck it up before resuming its standard grid.

It was like watching a predator spot its prey. 

There is a very visible difference in how the Scuba V3 seems to navigate compared to the Scuba X1, for example. The V3 looks very “aware” almost like a living being; it’s creepy at first. Furthermore, Aiper equipped the front of the unit with dual LED headlights. This allows the AI vision system to function perfectly during night cleanings, illuminating the murky depths so it never loses its way. And for the privacy-conscious, Aiper guarantees zero image storage and zero image upload – what happens in your pool, stays in your pool.  

Performance: Suck it up, kid 

In all my robot pool cleaner testing, I am still wondering what the point of diminishing returns is when it comes to gallons per hour (GPH) of suction. Spend more on a pool cleaner and get a higher suction rate, but what is the minimum you need for good performance in the category? I have yet to find that out. The Scuba V3 measures in at 4800 GPH, which isn’t nearly at the top of its class, but not weak either. The higher-end and slightly more expensive Scuba X1 comes in at 6600 GPH, which feels like A LOT more compared to the V3, but in my tests, the Scuba V3 did just fine.

During my two-week testing period, my pool was subjected to a barrage of spring pollen, wind-blown sand, and the inevitable barrage of leaves. The V3 offers multiple cleaning modes, but “Auto” (which hits the floor, walls, and waterline) and “AI Patrol” were my easy-option choices. Let’s talk about the filtration first. The basket utilizes a 3-micron MicroMesh filter. For context, a single strand of human hair is about 70 microns thick.

This mesh is so fine that it doesn’t just trap leaves and twigs; it captures that incredibly annoying, cloudy silt and fine sand that usually blows right through the exhaust of cheaper robotic vacuums. You can pull the micro-mesh filter out and use the standard filter if you want. I’m located here in Western Oregon, where I do not need to deal with sand or fine debris, as you might get in Arizona or Nevada, so I typically stick with the standard filter.  

Wall climbing is where the Scuba V3 truly shows off. It scales the vertical walls of my pool effortlessly. But the standout feature is the JetAssist™ horizontal waterline cleaning. Many robots will climb a wall, poke their nose out of the water, and fall back down. The V3 climbs up to the waterline and then uses a directed jet of water to push itself horizontally along the pool tile, vigorously scrubbing the scum line with its dual brushes.

It looks like it is defying gravity. 

It did a solid job of cleaning the waterline, cleaning about 1 inch higher up on the side; it literally hit the brick surround that hangs over the pool. One area that the V3 needs help with (and most pool cleaners do) would be the stairs. The Scuba V3 would make it up the first step no problem, then struggle with the second on occasion. I still had to manually clean the stairs every couple of weeks to finish the job thoroughly, though.   

It is important to understand where the Scuba V3 sits in terms of raw power. Here is a quick visual breakdown of how it compares to its direct competitors: 

• Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max: 8,500 GPH  

• Aiper Scuba S1 Pro: 6,000 GPH 

• Beatbot Aquasense Pro: 5,500 GPH 

• Aiper Scuba V3: 4,800 GPH 

• Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus: 4,500 GPH 

The Aiper App and connectivity: Now with a weather forecast 

I’ve always liked the Aiper app and find it to be easy to operate their products. It’s also easy to set up a new Aiper device with the app. Like their previous products, you need to install the app, turn the Scuba V3 into Bluetooth mode, connect the device to the app, and then set up Wi-Fi. 9/10 on the ease of use scale.  

I find the interface to be clean and functional. It’s easy to find instructions and support for your product through the app in the event that you throw out the setup guide. Aiper calls their app AI Navium because it’s an “advanced, cognitive AI mode designed for intelligent pool and yard management”. The key selling points by Aiper include:  

• Cognitive Cleaning plans: It will generate weekly cleaning plans based on AI analysis 

• Weather/History Sync: Analyzes local weather and past cleaning logs to determine optimal cleaning times 

• Vision Path Integration: Combines AI vision and dToF (direct time of flight) sensors for precise navigation 

• Smart Yard management: You can store different yards and products so that the system can schedule devices based on yards.  

AI Navium is an attempt by Aiper to get you to buy into their entire ecosystem of products so they can fully automate your yard. From sprinkler systems to pool cleaners and pool skimmers. I can’t really give you a detailed review of the AI Navium ecosystem based on a couple of products.

I love the idea of scheduling based on the weather, but it feels more gimmicky than anything. For me, it’s as simple as dumping the cleaner into the pool and coming back a few hours later and expecting the pool to be clean. How the cleaner does that isn’t really important to me.  

I want to point out, like I do for all of my pool cleaner reviews, that once the cleaner is submerged, you will lose a Wi-Fi connection to it. WiFi signals will not travel through water unless you have a special Wi-Fi communication device like the Aiper HydroComm, which will set you back $300-$400.

The Aiper HydroComm product not only extends Wi-Fi to your submerged cleaner, but also gives you pool chemical readings so you know if you need to add more chemicals to your pool. You decide if you need something like that. For me, personally, I am not changing the cleaning settings mid-cycle, so I am perfectly fine without a Wi-Fi connection while it’s underwater.  

Skimming off the top 

The Aiper Scuba V3 does have one feature missing that might be important to a lot of people – the ability to skim the top of the water to get floating debris. Here is why I don’t think this is that important: I would prefer to have a dedicated skimmer like the Aiper EcoSurfer S2 than to have it built into the pool cleaner itself. Once my pool bottom and walls are clean, I will pull the cleaner out, but I like to keep the EcoSurfer S2 running all day and sometimes all night.

Since it’s powered by solar, the battery literally never runs out, so you have a product that will likely suck up the debris before it hits the bottom of the pool. It’s like preventative maintenance, and I think the Aiper Ecosurfer S2 is the best skimmer on the market. Aiper sells both the Scuba V3 and the Ecosurfer S2 together in a package that saves you around a hundred bucks; that’s what I would personally recommend. 

If you want a pool cleaner that also skims on the top, there are plenty to choose from, but I highly recommend you get one with long battery life so it has plenty of time to clean the surface. Larger pools might give your pool cleaner an impossible challenge in this department if you do not size up the cleaner’s battery with your pool.  You can read my Aiper Surfer S2 review if you want to know more about it.

Battery life 

Battery life is what will really matter to you, especially if you have a larger pool. In my real-world testing, a full charge reliably delivered around 140 to 150 minutes of continuous cleaning. For my standard 15,000-gallon pool, this was more than enough time for the V3 to meticulously scrub the entire floor, climb every wall, and trace the entire waterline. Once the V3 was finished with the floor and walls, I had about 30 minutes of batter life leftover, not enough for another cleaning before it needed a recharge, but enough time leftover for me to run some errands and know that it’s still floating at the surface waiting for retrieval (the Scuba V3 will find an edge of the pool and float there thanks to its fans, waiting for you to pick it up out of the pool).  

Aiper packs a wireless charging dock with the Scuba V3, which lets you just set the robot on the dock without plugging anything into it. Typically, only more expensive robot cleaners come with a dock like this. The Beatbot Sora 70, for example, doesn’t come with a wireless dock and has a price tag of over $300 more. Using the charging dock, fully charging the Aiper Scuba V3 took a few hours to get to a full charge – pretty standard.  

The chart at the top of this response illustrates how the Aiper Scuba V3’s battery life stacks up against leading cordless robotic pool cleaners in the $900 to $1,900 price bracket. 

As the data shows, the Aiper Scuba V3 ($949) sits squarely in the middle of the pack with its 150-minute run time. Here is a breakdown of what that means for your purchasing decision: 

• The Direct Competitors: The Scuba V3 goes toe-to-toe with the Polaris Freedom, which typically retails for around $1,300 and offers an identical 150-minute battery life. However, the V3 heavily outperforms the similarly priced Dolphin Liberty 400 (~$1,200), which taps out after just 90 minutes of cleaning. 

• The Budget Alternative: Interestingly, Aiper’s own older model, the Scuba S1 Pro ($549), actually delivers 30 more minutes of runtime (180 minutes total) for less money. While you sacrifice the V3’s advanced AI Vision navigation and wireless charging dock by dropping down to the S1 Pro, it remains a fantastic option if sheer battery longevity on a budget is your top priority. 

• The Premium Upgrades: If you have an exceptionally large pool that demands marathon cleaning sessions, you will have to pay for it. The Beatbot Aquasense Pro ($1,861 and one of my favorites) pushes past the 3-hour mark with 205 minutes of bottom-cleaning endurance, while Aiper’s flagship Scuba X1 Pro Max ($1,830 and another favorite of mine) dwarfs the competition with an astonishing 300 minutes (5 hours) of battery life on a single charge. 

Ultimately, while the Scuba V3 doesn’t claim the crown for the longest-lasting battery on the market, 150 minutes is more than sufficient for the average 15,000-to-20,000-gallon residential pool. 

Durability and Warranty 

When you drop $1,199 on a piece of technology that lives underwater, you want absolute confidence that it isn’t going to short out or fall apart after a few months. The Aiper Scuba V3 feels incredibly robust. The outer shell is made of a high-impact, UV-resistant plastic that showed absolutely no signs of fading or chalking despite sitting out in the sun for hours on end. The tank treads are thick rubber, showing minimal wear even after aggressively scrubbing abrasive pool plaster for two weeks. 

Internally, the brushless motors are sealed tightly, and the elimination of the physical charging port via the new wireless dock removes the most common point of failure for underwater electronics (water leaking into the battery compartment). 

Aiper backs the Scuba V3 with a comprehensive 2-year warranty. In the world of pool robotics, 2 years is the standard benchmark, though some higher-priced competitors (like Beatbot) stretch to 3 years. Aiper’s customer service has built a solid reputation over the last few years, offering 24/7 support and a 30-day free return window if the robot simply doesn’t gel with your pool’s specific layout. Furthermore, Aiper regularly pushes over-the-air firmware updates via the AI Navium app, ensuring the robot’s navigation algorithms continue to improve over time. 

Full disclosure on my part: I only had the Aiper Scuba V3 for about a month, and while I had no issues with reliability, one month isn’t nearly long enough to test a pool cleaner in my opinion. So I’ll come back to the review and update it after I have the Scuba V3 for a while longer. I would recommend checking out the customer reviews on their website and any user reviews that might show up on Amazon, Google, and Reddit.  

Should you buy the Aiper Scuba V3? 

If you are in the market for a new pool cleaner, I would highly recommend the Scuba V3 and the Ecosurfer S2. With both products, you will have a spotless pool in no time. I think the Scuba V3 is a great value for the price; you get an effective cleaner built by a supportive company, a wireless charging doc and a very intuitive app to use.  

How I Tested The Aiper Scuba V3 

To evaluate the Aiper Scuba V3, I used it as my exclusive pool cleaning solution for 14 consecutive days in a 15,000-gallon, rectangle-shaped, in-ground plaster pool located in a high-wind environment prone to heavy debris. Testing involved subjecting the robot to both high-load days (deliberately dumping measured amounts of fine potting soil, sand, and larger cherry tree leaves into the deep end) and low-load days featuring standard ambient dust and bugs. 

I tested the robot in all available app modes, closely monitoring the AI Patrol’s ability to recognize and divert toward specific debris clusters. Battery runtimes were measured from the moment the robot submerged to the exact moment it engaged its Smart Waterline Parking feature. Navigational efficiency was visually tracked to ensure overlapping floor coverage without repeated blind spots, and the wireless charging dock was evaluated for ease of use and consistent charging times in an uncovered outdoor environment. 

Quadcopters tend to have very poor efficency because of their high disk loading. High disk loading– that is, how much weight each square meter of area swept by the propellers must carry–is almost unavoidable with conventinal quadcopters, which are controlled by throttling the four props. Make the propellers too big, and their inertia slows down that control loop, leading to stability problems. [rctestflight] had an idea to solve this, by borrowing a technology from the world of fixed-wing aviation: variable-pitch propellers.

In aircraft use, they are not new, dating back to the end of the first world war. They’re made for everything from the largest turboprops to the  75 kW(100 HP) Rotax 912. By varying the propeller pitch, you can keep the engine turning in its ideal RPM range but still vary thrust by taking a larger or shallower ‘bite’ out of the air with each sweep of the prop. You can probably see how this applies to the quadcopter: a well-designed pitch-change mechanism is going to be much quicker than throttling a big prop with lots of rotational inertia. That’s the theory.

To test it, [rctestflight] builds some large 3D-printed variable pitch props, hooks them up to regular drone motors via a belt drive, before going on–you guessed it–an RC test flight. To make that work, he’s got the pitch servo being driven from what should be the flight controller’s thrust output to each motor. Aside from the vibrations from imperfect balance on the 3D-printed props, it flies quite well– and much better with pitch control than trying to vary the RPMs of those heavy props. He’s even able to reverse the propeller pitch, making this perhaps the first quadcopter capable of autorotation. Well, almost, given that it lost control and came apart when he cut the throttle.

As for efficiency, it is exactly what you’d expect from this disk loading– so, higher than a conventional quad–even with losses from the belt drive and the high-friction surface of a 3D print. Speaking of 3D-prints, the props did hold up to the maximum RPMs he could throw at them, so no ‘kaboom’ in this video. There is a fun rotary subwoofer bonus at the end, though.

Overall, [rctestflight] thinks his variable-pitch quadcopter proves the concept, but that if you’re going to all this effort you may as well build a helicopter and have fewer points of failure. We kind of have to agree. That is how it worked out historically, after all.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen hackers trying to improve drone efficiency– there was the hybrid ‘giant propeller’ drone a while back, and the ‘slap a wing on it’ technique featured more recently.

The gaming mouse world has pretty much been the same for the last few years, with the only real improvement being weight savings. Now, Logitech has just introduced a new high-end gaming mouse in India, the Pro X2 Superstrike, and it’s bringing something genuinely new to the table. With it, the company is trying to rethink how mouse clicks work entirely, replacing traditional mechanical switches with a new system designed for faster response and better control. Here’s what you need to know about it.

A New Way to Click

The biggest highlight of the PRO X2 SUPERSTRIKE is its Haptic Inductive Trigger System (HITS), which ditches conventional microswitches in favor of inductive analog sensing paired with real-time haptic feedback.

In simpler terms, clicks aren’t just registered—they’re felt instantly. The system allows players to adjust the sensitivity of each click, with multiple actuation levels and reset points to suit their playstyle. Whether you prefer quick taps in FPS games or more deliberate clicks in strategy titles, the mouse can be tuned accordingly. Logitech claims this setup can reduce click latency by up to 30 milliseconds, and if this is true, it’ll reshape the landscape altogether. We have the Pro X2 for testing purposes, so keep an eye out for the full review dropping soon.

Beyond the click tech, the PRO X2 SUPERSTRIKE packs serious hardware. It features Logitech’s HERO 2 sensor with up to 44K DPI and supports an 8K polling rate, meaning it sends data to your PC every 0.125 milliseconds. The mouse is also capable of tracking extremely fast movements, with support for high acceleration and precise tracking even during rapid flicks. Despite all that, Logitech has kept the weight down to around 65 grams, making it suitable for long gaming sessions without fatigue. It also includes PTFE feet for smoother gliding and a battery life of up to 90 hours, which should easily last through extended sessions.

The Logitech G PRO X2 SUPERSTRIKE will be available in India in a Lunar Eclipse color option, priced at ₹23,995.

A threat actor tracked as UNC6783 is compromising business process outsourcing (BPO) providers to gain access to high-value companies across multiple sectors.

According to the Google Threat Intelligence Group, dozens of corporate entities have been targeted through this method to exfiltrate sensitive data for extortion.

Austin Larsen, GTIG principal threat analyst, says that UNC6783 typically relies on social engineering and phishing campaigns to compromise BPOs working with targeted companies.

However, there have been instances where the hackers have also contacted support and helpdesk staff within targeted organizations, in an attempt to obtain direct access.

The researchers say that UNC6783 may be linked to Raccoon, a persona known to have targeted multiple BPOs that provide services to large companies.

In social engineering attacks over live chat, the threat actor directs support employees to spoofed Okta login pages hosted on domains that impersonate those of the target company and follow the pattern [.]zendesk-support<##>[.]com.

Larsen says that the phishing kit deployed in these attacks can steal clipboard contents to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) protection, enabling the attacker to register their device with the organization.

Google has also observed attacks where UNC6783 distributed fake security updates to deliver remote access malware.

After stealing sensitive data, the threat actor proceeds to extort victims, contacting them via ProtonMail addresses with payment demands.

While GTIG did not offer more information about Raccoon, threat intelligence account International Cyber Digest recently disclosed that someone using the alias “Mr. Raccoon” claimed a breach at Adobe, which the company has yet to confirm.

The attacker claimed to have gained access to Adobe data after compromising an India-based BPO working for the company. They deployed a remote access trojan (RAT) on an employee’s computer and subsequently targeted the employee’s manager in a phishing attack.

Mr. Raccoon said that they stole 13 million support tickets containing personal data, employee records, HackerOne submissions, and internal documents.

In conversations with BleepingComputer, the threat actor behind the CrunchyRoll breach confirmed that they were also behind the Adobe attack, but did not provide any evidence.

Google’s Mandiant listed several defense recommendations against UNC6783 attacks, including deploying FIDO2 security keys for MFA, monitoring live chat for abuse, blocking spoofed domains that match Zendesk patterns, and regularly auditing MFA device enrollments.

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Get Your Copy Now