Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle is a fun one, covering a wide variety of sports. If you’re struggling with the puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group hint: Fore!

Green group hint: Football games.

Blue group hint: College competitors.

Purple group hint: Not shoes.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: Golf clubs.

Green group: Can precede “Bowl,” in NFL context.

Blue group: An Atlantic 10 athlete.

Purple group: ____ Sox.

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is golf clubs.

The four answers are driver, hybrid, iron and putter.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is can precede “Bowl,” in NFL context.

The four answers are fog, ice, pro and Super.

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is an Atlantic 10 athlete.

The four answers are Billiken, Flyer, Rambler and Spider.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is ____ Sox.

The four answers are Aqua, White, Red and Woo.

CNET editor Gael Fashingbauer Cooper, a journalist and pop-culture junkie, is co-author of “Whatever Happened to Pudding Pops? The Lost Toys, Tastes and Trends of the ’70s and ’80s,” as well as “The Totally Sweet ’90s.” She’s been a journalist since 1989, working at Mpls.St.Paul Magazine, Twin Cities Sidewalk, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and NBC News Digital. She’s Gen X in birthdate, word and deed. If Marathon candy bars ever come back, she’ll be first in line.

See full bio

Expect to save over $600 on the hottest models, including $250 off monitors, for crisp and clear gaming (or writing), 40% off laptops, and up to $1,200 off desktops for true gamers. We’ve rounded up the top Dell coupon codes and discounts so you can save big on pricey tech.

Get 10% Off With Top Dell Coupon Codes

If you haven’t bought from Dell, right now you can get seriously rewarded for switching. Right now, new customers can get 10% off Dell products when you sign up for their email newsletter. Plus, you’ll get additional perks like exclusive offers in your inbox and invites to special sale events, including flash discounts during seasonal sales. Plus, right now you can use Dell promo code AFFBUNDLE10 to get an extra 10% off when you bundle select PCs with accessories. And, save your tech refresh with clearance sale discounts and Dell promo codes today.

20% Off With This Dell Coupon: Dell 14 Premium

As mentioned, one of the best ways to save big on tech purchases is by buying a certified refurbished Dell laptop through the Dell Outlet. The Dell outlet has tons of like-new tech for hundreds less than if bought brand new. You can get top tech like the Dell 14 Premium for $1,036 when bought refurbished—that’s $259 in savings! With this powerful laptop, you’ll have built-in Intel Arc 140T Graphics and FHD RGB + IR Camera and Microphone, among other perks. Be sure to check out the Dell Outlet for tons of Dell tech for hundreds less.

Get $520 Off the Dell 14 Plus

The Dell 14 Plus served as Dell’s rebranding launch, and when we reviewed the laptop, we appreciated its fast performance, great battery life, solid IPS display, comfortable keyboard and touchpad. With this Dell 14 Plus offer, you get the laptop for only $860 if you have a valid college email address that’s been verified. You’ll get the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V with eight core processing, Windows 11 Home operating system, Intel® Arc Graphics, 16 GB of memory, and 1 TB of SSD storage.

Save $450 With Dell Coupons for Laptops, Alienware Monitors, and More

Been wanting to upgrade your WFH or gaming setup? Dell has marked down some of their most popular laptops and monitors during their holiday and tech refresh sale events. There are stellar deals like $400 off the Alienware 16X Aurora (one of the best gaming laptops we’ve seen of its kind), and $450 off the Alienware 18 Area-51. Complete your gaming experience with an Alienware Area-51 desktop for $1,200 off, which includes 50% more processing power. Some other great Dell monitor deals we’ve found include the ability for Rewards members to earn up to 3 times the amount of points (or 9% back) on select Alienware monitors. Plus, you can save $100 on the Alienware 4K QD-OLED gaming monitor, or $120 on the Alienware 27 Gaming monitor, right now. And you can also get 30% off the Dell 24-inch monitor when you purchase any laptop or desktop computer.

We’ve also found steep discounts on some of our favorite WIRED-tested gear, including $160 off the Bose Quiet Comfort headphones (now only $199), and $350 off the Dell 14 Plus Laptop.

The deals don’t stop there though, with discounts on Dell’s best-selling laptops and PCs, including: $200 off the Dell 15 laptop, $500 off the Dell 16 Plus laptop, and 50% off software when you purchase a PC. Whether you want to work-from-home or game-from-home more effectively, check out the latest offers in the Dell deals hub.

Dell has rotating best deals of the week too, like their best-selling monitors, which include Dell 27 Plus 4K monitors (starting at $129), $400 off QD-OLED gaming monitors like the popular Alienware 34 Curved model, plus $350 off Alienware Aurora gaming desktops and $200 off Tower Plus desktop computers.

10% Dell Coupon for Students, Military Members, and Medical Workers

Students, it’s the worst time of your life, you might as well save a little money. Just kidding, life only gets harder from here. Kidding. Again. Maybe. What is not a joke is this deal. Dell is giving students a 10% discount on things students need like Dell XPS laptops and Alienware gaming rigs. No need to say anything about gaming. It’s for your eyes, because they’re starting to bleed from all the term papers.

To the discount, first, make sure you have a Dell account and that the Dell Rewards box is checked. Once you’re enrolled in both, verify your .edu email address through the membership tab of your account. Not a student? No problem, Dell still has some great deals for your computing needs. Beyond students, Dell offers an extra 5% off Heroes discount for military members, veterans, employees, rewards members, and businesses. Verify through GovX or VCS in a matter of minutes to get exclusive pricing and early access to sale events.

Don’t Miss Dell’s Ultimate College Offer

Getting prepared for college is the most exciting, sometimes stressful, and often one of the most expensive times in a person’s life. With Dell’s Ultimate College Offers, students can save an extra 10% and get the Microsoft College Offer for free on select PCs—this includes a year of Microsoft 365, Xbox Game Pass, and a customizable Xbox controller, because Dell knows that although you work hard, you need to play a little too. This is over $500 worth of products, for free, with this limited-time Dell discount offer.

Exclusive Discount for Seniors at Dell

Dell wants to make their valuable tech more accessible to seniors by providing Dell discounts for seniors. Once you become a verified senior, you’ll be eligible for special Dell savings on laptops and computing tech. First, create a Dell account, then register as a Dell Rewards member. Once you verify your senior status, exclusive Dell senior savings will be reflected in the cart!

Get 6% Back With Dell Rewards Coupons and Financing Offers

Don’t forget that, in addition to the Dell coupons available, there are also limited-time discounts for Dell Rewards program members. Rewards customers get double the points right now, or 6% back on almost everything. This means if you’re signed up with an email, you can get triple the discount, plus, 5% off select XPS and Dell Premium systems. If you open a Dell Pay Credit Account, you’ll earn $100 (or 10,000 points) in Dell Rewards dollars once you enroll in the Dell Rewards program.

Earn $50 Back With Dell Online Coupon

Becoming a Dell Rewards Member is one of the easiest ways you can save when shopping online at Dell. When you shop Dell.com as a member you’ll earn 3% back in rewards, which are usually added to your account within 30 days of your order’s ship date. Plus, you can monitor Rewards history, get exclusive member perks, deals, and member-only benefits with your rewards account. And perhaps best of all, right now Dell Rewards Members can earn an extra $50 back on any XPS PC (until July 1).

Always Get a Discount With Dell Price Matching

Unlike many companies, Dell’s Price Match Guarantee covers competitor prices and if a product drops on the Dell website. Best of all, their competitor price match policy is available before or after you buy. So, when you find an identical Dell, HP, Apple or Lenovo computer, you’ll just need to share the link with a Dell expert through chat or a phone call to get that lower price. If you’ve already purchased the item, but find the product on Dell’s or a competitor’s site within 30 days, share the link through the Order Support portal and you’ll be refunded the difference.

Shop Our Favorite Dell Laptops for Your Gaming or Office Upgrade

Dell’s XPS laptops are the perfect addition to your tech setup. They’re lightweight, small, and plenty speedy. They’re Windows’ rough answer to Apple’s Macbook Pro line. The XPS 13 and upgraded Dell 14 Premium are some of our favorite laptops. Check out the featured laptop offers above to save up to $600, complete with free 2-day shipping and AI-driven PC options powered by Microsoft Copilot technology. If you’re a gamer, you probably already know that Dell makes Alienware, and the Dell Alienware m16 R2 is a powerful gaming machine masquerading as your next work laptop. It’s one of our favorite dual-use gaming rigs, making it perfect for students.

Join Dell’s Business Partnership Program for More Savings

The Dell Business Partnerships program is ideal for small business owners, with exclusive access to business-only tech savings. When enrolled in this valuable service, you’ll get exclusive member-only discounts, IT help, and exclusive access to Dell business tech advisors to help you navigate through any business tech issues. Plus, you’ll get extra savings when enrolled with Dell Rewards, automatic savings that are applied at checkout, and tons of membership benefits like discounts and guided help. To enroll in Dell’s Business Partnership program, you’ll need to get your Dell Membership passcode, sign in or create your account and enroll in Dell Rewards. Once that’s done, you’ll just need to validate your membership passcode, and your discount will be applied automatically in your cart.

Two weeks ago the same project could only push a handful of PlayStation 5 titles past their loading screens. Today a free, open-source emulator called Kyty is running fully 3D commercial games on ordinary Windows PCs with player control and frame rates that actually feel usable.

XIII, a 2020 cell-shaded version of a classic first-person shooter, is an excellent example. The PS5 Emulation community’s footage demonstrates that the game is truly starting to come together, with frame rates ranging from 20 to 30. You can walk about, shoot objects, and look up and down, and even if the floor and skyboxes are missing in some spots, the textures break, and the lighting goes all goofy, the game is still playable. To be fair, it has never actually been playable outside of official hardware.

PlayStation®5 console – 1TB

• From Jan. 2028, newly released games on PlayStation will be available for purchase on PlayStation Store and at retailers in digital format only. Discs…
• PlayStation 5 Console – 1TB, includes wireless controller, 1TBSSD, Disc Drive, 2 Horizontal Stand Feet, HDMI cable, AC power cord, USB cable, printed…
• 1TB of Storage, keep your favorite games ready and waiting for you to jump in and play

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Wrath of the Mutants isn’t far behind, as after a slight wobble at launch, it settles into a fairly consistent 22 to 24 frames per second, with crisper character models and settings than XIII. The movement is still choppy, but you can play as the turtles bashing the bad enemies without the entire scene disintegrating into chaos. Both of these results are quite remarkable, coming as they did within a 48-hour period at the end of July. That speed is significant, as Kyty has previously managed menus and short video clips for games such as Grand Theft Auto V and Quake II Remastered, but it has only lately been able to get in-game control to function reliably on two separate 3D engines. This has put it well ahead of its primary competitor, SharpEmu, at least in terms of what they are presenting publicly. SharpEmu has its job cut out just getting some of the deeper rendering and synchronization issues resolved before they can reach the same point, and they won’t get there anytime soon based on the current demos.

It’s easy to see why this is happening, given that Sony has discontinued physical CDs and Grand Theft Auto VI still has no release date on PC, much alone a release date at all. The emulation community has seized the opportunity and is working tirelessly to close the gap. Kyty is developed in C++, and the developers refer to it as a compatibility layer rather than a full-fledged reimplementation from the ground up. It can already handle a combination of Unreal, Unity, and bespoke engines without the need for any specific hardware modules.

All of this is still very much a work in progress, as you can notice graphical errors from a mile away, the frame rate drops like a stone when you hit a difficult scenario, and some games are still only running at one or two frames. To complicate matters further, it requires a legal dump of the game you own to function (even though you probably already have one laying around). Also, keep in mind that this is still very early days, and each new build released can change behavior overnight. What is evident is that the community is accustomed to sharing short video and demonstrating their growth, which is becoming increasingly visible week after week.

What sticks out is the simplicity of the hardware requirements. None of the videos discuss the necessity for costly equipment or a unique setup. You only have a standard gaming PC, which could be one of the reasons this community is developing so quickly. Anyone can download the most recent code from GitHub, attach it to a game folder, and return a log file. Each report assists the team in determining what is causing the next set of visuals to disappear or skyboxes to fail.
[Source]

The Arch Linux project has temporarily disabled adoption of Arch User Repository (AUR) packages after a surge in malicious takeovers of existing packages.

The decision was announced on the distribution’s mailing list by contributor Robin Candau, who said that the situation is temporary until a solution is found.

“Due to the current influx of malicious package adoptions and follow-up commits made via the AUR, package adoption is currently disabled while we are handling the situation,” announced Candau.

“We will send a follow-up once we’re able to. In the meantime, feel free to report suspicious adoption events or commits that haven’t been dealt with yet, and stay vigilant!”

Independent Federated Intelligence Network (IFIN) conducted a technical analysis of the malware and reported that the campaign began on July 29 with the package ‘openconnect-sso.’

IFIN reports that the campaign bears many similarities to the last campaign, including the use of the Tor network for staging.

In June, a separate campaign hit AUR via more than 400 packages, distributing a Linux rootkit and info-stealer malware to unsuspecting users.

In the latest attack, the researchers identified a two-stage infection, with the first stage acting as the loader, and the second one being a Linux x86_64 payload described as stealer malware with remote administration (RAT) and SSH worm features.

Further analysis showed that the first-stage loader evades detection by checking for debuggers, sandboxes, virtual machines, and CI/CD environments before installing systemd services and cron jobs to ensure persistence.

It then downloads and launches a Tor client disguised as dbus-daemon to retrieve the second-stage payload from an ‘.onion’ server.

The second stage is a Rust-based infostealer that targets browser credentials, cryptocurrency wallets, password manager data, cloud and developer secrets, AI service API keys, SSH keys, and messaging platform tokens.

It also provides the attacker with remote command execution over an encrypted Tor channel and can spread laterally by using stolen SSH keys to copy and execute itself on other systems.

A Reddit user tracking the campaign alleges that it has expanded to over 200 AUR packages, either through compromised maintainer accounts or by adopting orphaned packages.

According to the same researcher, the campaign has spread to fairly popular AUR packages such as boringssl-git, icloudpd, windscribe-cli-v2-bin, stirling-pdf-desktop-bin, openconnect-sso, arduino-language-server-noclang-bin, and pgadmin4-server.

The compromised status of these packages has not been independently confirmed, and a list of all 200 AUR packages believed to be malicious has not been made available as of publication.

Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.

The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.

Advertisement

Get the whitepaper

One company’s inventive campaign for an unreleased product has become a contest between Anthropic and OpenAI to see which can shout the loudest about its own failures.

Readers who tuned in earlier today saw the latest episode in the drama – or sitcom – as Anthropic tried to outdo OpenAI’s appropriation of the Mythos marketing playbook and made itself the punchline.

Since first teasing Mythos in April, Anthropic has marketed the model through fear – declaring its cybersecurity models too dangerous for public release and offering access only to a select few trusted organizations via Project Glasswing.

To its credit, the strategy has paid off. Anthropic has closely associated the Mythos name with cybersecurity, which may explain why OpenAI appeared to borrow its competitor’s proven PR strategy last week.

OpenAI agents exploited a zero-day to escape their sandbox, leading to the autonomous cyberattack on Hugging Face. The episode duly secured sensational headlines playing on the long-held fear that AI will one day go rogue and take over the world.

Anthropic responded this week by lathering on even more clown makeup, squandering an opportunity in the process.

The Claude maker sent its models into a testing environment to capture a flag. Their prompts said they had no internet access, but because of what Anthropic called “a misunderstanding” with evaluation partner Irregular, the connection was live.

Anthropic’s models then followed OpenAI’s script: they reached the public internet and attacked systems belonging to outside organizations. This time, three were affected rather than one, the company admitted.

In one scenario, Mythos 5 persuaded developers to download a poisoned PyPI package. It was installed on 15 machines, including one at a cybersecurity company that routinely scans such packages for malware.

In Anthropic’s words: “When that company’s scanner installed the package, Claude’s hidden code executed. We believe the company’s security scanner treated PyPI packages as safe to install, and as a result, Claude was able to exfiltrate the company’s credentials to a collection point it had set up. Claude then used these credentials to access further infrastructure from this company.”

Worse still, the first of the three incidents occurred in April. Anthropic discovered them only months later, during a retrospective manual review prompted by OpenAI’s disclosure. Had it not gone looking, they might never have been discovered, let alone disclosed.

There are some caveats. Opus 4.7, the oldest model tested, attacked production systems despite apparently recognizing what it was doing. Mythos 5 recognized that accessing the internet violated its instructions, then reasoned its way into continuing anyway. It was also responsible for publishing the poisoned PyPI package.

Only an unnamed research model stopped itself from attacking external organizations.

Anthropic also said the models were not running with the production safeguards and monitoring that would normally surround a deployment. Most damningly, Anthropic ran Mythos 5 – the model it had deemed too dangerous for public release – without safeguards in an environment that unexpectedly had internet access.

Following OpenAI’s admission that it failed so badly in its responsibility to control its technology, Anthropic could have easily spun the story in its favor.

You don’t have to be fictional tapdancing political PR antihero Malcolm Tucker to see how Anthropic could have used the episode to make its case as the safer, more trustworthy AI company.

Instead, realizing its own marketing playbook was being used to help a competitor, it went head-to-head with OpenAI, willingly admitted that it made similar sandbox-based blunders, and disclosed that the results were even more calamitous. Three companies hacked, not just one.

So, while the AI biz has attempted to eclipse OpenAI’s “rogue agent” story with its own, what’s left behind is a new reputation for irresponsible handling of technology.

Failed superheroes

The incident does not instill a great deal of trust in either Anthropic or OpenAi to safeguard the world from its AI.

Dr Ilia Kolochenko, founder of ImmuniWeb and practising cybersecurity and data protection lawyer, likened the two companies to failed superheroes.

“While making conclusions would be a bit premature at this point in time, the incidents certainly do not increase confidence in the AI vendor’s ability to safely deploy AI, let alone to assure their customers that the so-called frontier models are safe to use,” he told The Register. 

“It is akin to hiring a superhero to protect you but being afraid that the superhero may suddenly go rogue and kill you and your family. Nobody needs such a superhero.”

Likewise, security pro Jake Williams, VP at HunterStrategy and IANS faculty member, said: “I’m not going to mince words: the major AI labs are negligent in protecting the public from their agents. 

“We need government regulation now or at the very least a private cause of action with guaranteed punitive damages for agents damaging others.”

By trying to reclaim a marketing trope that served it well, Anthropic has invited scrutiny of its own safety record and accusations that it is chasing attention above all else.

Other experts we spoke to shared the concern that both companies are mishandling their agents, with potentially greater consequences as the systems become more capable.

The common thread is recklessness, which Anthropic and OpenAI seem oddly eager to advertise. ®

Anthropic said its Claude-based security models gained unauthorized access to the sensitive production environments of three outside organizations during internal testing designed to measure the models’ offensive cyber capabilities.

The events, which Anthropic revealed Thursday, are the second revelation in 10 days that AI models from the world’s wealthiest providers have trespassed into protected networks, an offense that, in more traditional hacking scenarios, could land the human behind the keyboard in prison for years. Earlier this month, OpenAI said its security models exploited a zero-day vulnerability for use in breaking into the network of Hugging Face, a platform for open source machine-learning models and AI datasets. The OpenAI models went on to steal access credentials and other confidential Hugging Face information. The OpenAI models also exploited publicly exposed credentials to compromise accounts of four other third-party services.

Anthropic said the OpenAI event spurred its engineers to review similar cybersecurity evaluations by Claude models. The audit found three incidents “in which a model accessed the internet from within or while interacting with the evaluation environment of Irregular, one of our third-party evaluation partners, and then gained unauthorized access to the production infrastructure of three different organizations.”

When Models fail to discern reality from fiction

Anthropic said the prompts engineers delivered during “capture the flag” challenges—a common means for assessing the offensive and defensive capabilities of various hacking techniques—made clear that the testing environment was only a simulation and that the models had no access to the open Internet. In fact, the testing partner Irregular mistakenly made such access available. In response the models treated the Internet paths as part of the exercises.

The intrusions happened through three Claude models: Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research prototype. Opus 4.7, the oldest of the three, was the one that overstepped its boundaries the most. Anthropic explained:

Operating under the false belief that all accessible entities were intended to be in-scope for the exercise, Claude compromised the impacted organizations’ infrastructure using basic techniques, such as exploiting weak passwords and unauthenticated endpoints. It did not find or exploit any complex vulnerabilities, and in each case, Claude continued working to complete only the specific capture-the-flag task its evaluation had assigned. However, in some cases, our older model continued its attack even after getting evidence it was running on the open internet; our latest model stopped once it recognized it was on the internet. In none of these situations did Claude exfiltrate itself or deliberately attempt to escape its test environment.

While the Opus model continued its attack even after correctly predicting that it had breached the third-party organization’s production system, Anthropic said, Mythos 5 made a similar inference but “reasoned its way back to the conclusion that it was still in a simulation.” That meant that Mythos, too, didn’t abort the exercise once it had clearly stepped over the line. After also exceeding the bounds of level behavior, the internal test model eventually found evidence that it, too, had impinged and stopped the exercise.

AudioBro launched globally less than two weeks ago with a simple but potentially useful pitch for hi-fi and home theater owners: before you buy another amplifier, streamer, loudspeaker, subwoofer, DAC, cable, isolation puck, or mystical cable riser, perhaps figure out whether the room is the problem.

It probably is.

The Australian company has already followed that launch with AudioBro V2, which is either an impressively fast development cycle or evidence that software version numbers now require a seat belt. The update does not abandon the original platform so much as pull its previously separate room-analysis tools into one conversational interface.

Users can describe what sounds wrong, upload room photographs, REW measurements, speaker layouts, and AVR calibration screenshots, and let AudioBro determine which analyses are relevant before recommending one practical, high-impact next move. V2 also adds persistent Room Memory, while Pro users can speak with the platform and receive its guidance by voice. 

AudioBro remains a web-based platform designed to identify what is actually limiting a system’s performance. That could be room acoustics, loudspeaker placement, seating position, subwoofer integration, calibration settings, or some messy combination of all of the above. It is available globally through AudioBro.ai, with pricing listed in U.S. dollars.

That matters because the upgrade treadmill is very real. A lot of systems do not fail because the loudspeakers are bad or the amplifier is underpowered. They fail because the speakers are shoved into the wrong part of the room, the listening chair is parked in a bass null, the center channel is aimed at someone’s knees, or the subwoofer is doing its best impression of a drunk forklift. My back would concur with that last point.

AudioBro was founded by Ateeq Sheikh and has been in development for more than three years. The company describes V2 as its largest evolution to date, combining visual, geometric, calibration, and measured evidence with conversational guidance, persistent room history, and retesting. In theory, that should make it easier for users to understand what is limiting their system before they start replacing equipment that may not be the problem. 

What AudioBro V2 Actually Does

AudioBro V2 is not a black box that magically fixes your room while you make coffee. Users still have to supply the evidence: room photographs, dimensions, loudspeaker layout, system details, listening concerns, calibration screenshots, and, when available, measurements from tools such as REW, Dirac Live, Audyssey, Yamaha YPAO, Anthem ARC Genesis, and Lyngdorf RoomPerfect. More advanced users can also upload native REW .mdat measurement files and exported measurement data for deeper analysis.

What has changed is how users access AudioBro’s underlying tools. The original platform separated its capabilities into Photo Acoustics for visual room analysis, RoomMatch for loudspeaker and listening-position guidance, Tune My Sub for subwoofer optimization, Fix My Room for broader room diagnosis, BassMap for low-frequency placement modeling, and Response IQ for interpreting calibration screenshots. V2 brings those functions into one conversational interface, so users no longer have to decide which tool to open before they understand what is wrong. They can describe the problem, upload whatever evidence they have, and let AudioBro determine which analyses are relevant. 

The platform then attempts to prioritize the problem rather than burying the user in a graph cemetery. A room photograph, REW measurement, and AVR calibration screenshot can now be considered together before AudioBro recommends what it believes is the single highest-impact next move. V2 also adds persistent Room Memory, which keeps previous analyses, uploaded measurements, implemented recommendations, and verified changes connected over time. Pro users can speak with the platform and receive its guidance by voice, which should be useful when both hands are occupied moving a 90-pound subwoofer that someone previously insisted belonged in the worst possible corner. 

That last part remains central to AudioBro’s value proposition. The pitch is not merely that AI can look at your room. It is that the platform can combine several kinds of evidence, decide what deserves attention first, and remember what happened after you changed it. The important questions are still the same: what should you fix first, did the recommendation actually help, and does the platform know when it lacks enough evidence to answer confidently?

The arrival of AudioBro V2 has not changed the published pricing structure. Users who would rather have someone else examine the evidence can still purchase a one-off Room Review without subscribing. A Quick Room Review costs $97, a Full Room Diagnosis is $149, and a Measurement Review is $199. AudioBro says each report is personally reviewed by founder Ateeq Sheikh rather than generated and fired back by AI while everyone goes to lunch, with recommendations delivered within 72 hours. 

For users who want to work through the platform themselves, Starter costs $24.99 per month or $199.90 annually, which works out to $16.66 per month. Pro costs $49.99 monthly or $399.90 annually, equivalent to $33.33 per month. Starter includes room analysis, placement guidance, Photo Acoustics, browser-based sweeps, saved rooms, and progress tracking, while Pro adds REW and .mdat interpretation, calibration analysis, microphone workflows, and more advanced measurement validation. 

AudioBro is also offering limited founding-member lifetime access to the first 500 users. Starter Lifetime is listed at $199, while Pro Lifetime costs $299 and includes future features, beta access, and one expert consultation. Those prices are conspicuously lower than paying for even one full year at the annual rate, suggesting AudioBro is very eager to put early adopters in the room before someone from accounting notices.

AudioBro Founder Ateeq Sheikh Answers Our Questions

AudioBro makes some ambitious promises about helping users identify room, placement, and calibration problems before they spend more money on equipment. We asked founder Ateeq Sheikh about his industry background, the role of AI, who reviews the company’s paid reports, and why anyone might need a continuing subscription once the loudspeakers have stopped fighting the room.

eCoustics: Why did you create AudioBro?

Ateeq Sheikh: After more than 30 years in the hi-fi industry, I kept seeing enthusiasts spend thousands of dollars upgrading equipment when the biggest limitation was usually the room, loudspeaker placement, or system setup.

The goal of AudioBro has always been to make expert, room-first optimization accessible to more people and help them understand what to change first before spending more money.

eCoustics: Do you have professional credentials in acoustic engineering, calibration, or installation?

Sheikh: I do not hold a formal degree in acoustic engineering. My formal education is in business and IT, but I have spent more than 30 years working professionally in the hi-fi industry across technical, product-management, training, and leadership roles.

During that time, I worked with brands including Denon, Marantz, McIntosh, Wharfedale, Quad, Audiolab, KEF, MartinLogan, Audio Research, Dynaudio, Tannoy, Anthem, and many others. I also completed extensive manufacturer training covering loudspeakers, room-calibration technologies, A/V receivers, and system design.

I was fortunate to be mentored by the late John Dunlavy, whose approach to loudspeaker design, room interaction, and measurement had a lasting influence on how I think about audio reproduction.

Much of my career also involved creating and delivering training. As Head of Product Management at IAG Australia, I was responsible for developing and presenting technical training for dealers, installers, and staff across the Wharfedale, Quad, and Audiolab brands.

In later roles representing Denon, Marantz, McIntosh, Anthem, and other manufacturers, I continued leading product education, technical training, and system demonstrations throughout Australia.

AudioBro reflects that combination of industry experience, manufacturer training, and practical system optimization rather than a purely academic approach to acoustics.

eCoustics: Does a person oversee the Room Review reports, or is the entire process handled by AI?

Sheikh: One of the core principles behind AudioBro is that AI should augment experience, not replace it.

The platform uses AI and machine learning to analyze the available evidence, but the Room Review service is personally reviewed by me. AudioBro has always been designed around a human-in-the-loop approach, combining AI with decades of real-world audio experience.

eCoustics: Does anyone other than you currently handle Room Reviews or consultations?

Sheikh: At the moment, I personally oversee all Room Reviews and consultations.

As AudioBro grows, I will expand that side of the business, but maintaining consistency and quality has been important during the early stages.

eCoustics: Why offer a monthly subscription? Would most users not need the service only once?

Sheikh: That is a question I have spent a lot of time thinking about.

Some people will only need AudioBro once, particularly when setting up a new room, and that is why we introduced the one-off Room Reviews.

Other users continue making changes. They add equipment, integrate subwoofers, move house, optimize multiple rooms, experiment with placement, or compare measurements over time. The subscription allows the platform to evolve alongside those users while we continue adding new tools, workflows, and capabilities.

eCoustics: Is there any particular meaning behind the name AudioBro?

Sheikh: Absolutely. Hi-fi can sometimes feel intimidating, overly technical, or even elitist. I wanted to build something that felt approachable and helpful instead.

The idea behind the name was simple: imagine having a knowledgeable friend beside you, helping you achieve better sound without the jargon or guesswork. That is the personality I wanted the platform to have from day one.

Is AudioBro V2 Unique?

Sort of. The idea that room acoustics matter is not new. Neither are acoustic measurements, room correction, placement modeling, or remote calibration. REW users, custom installers, acousticians, and home theater owners have been wrestling with this stuff for years—usually while staring at enough graphs to make an actuary reconsider their career choices.

What is different is the packaging. AudioBro V2 pulls its previously separate analysis tools into one conversational interface that can consider room photographs, dimensions, speaker layouts, REW measurements, and calibration screenshots together. It then attempts to determine which analysis matters, recommend one practical next move, and remember what happened after the user made it. Pro subscribers can also interact with it by voice. 

That combination of conversational guidance, multimodal evidence, prioritization, and persistent Room Memory is the more interesting part of V2. AudioBro is trying to make room optimization feel less like joining a secret society with a calibrated microphone and more like working through a guided consultation. It now sits somewhere between a measurement interpreter, placement tool, acoustic consultant, calibration assistant, and room-history file.

That could be genuinely useful because most listeners do not need another conflicting forum thread with 173 replies and four people arguing about microphone orientation. They need someone—or something—to say: move this first, measure again, and do not buy that thing yet.

The caveat remains obvious. AudioBro’s recommendations are only as reliable as the evidence supplied, the quality of its analysis, and the user’s willingness to follow through. A poorly taken measurement, incomplete room photograph, or inaccurate set of dimensions can still lead the entire exercise into the weeds. The Audio Science Review crowd will almost certainly dissect all of this across several hundred posts, followed by a “thank you, sir, may I have another” meeting held under strictly controlled conditions. That is 100% guaranteed.

Why Not Just Use Dirac Live?

Because AudioBro and Dirac Live are not the same thing.

Dirac Live is room-correction software that measures a system with a microphone and creates filters to correct frequency and timing issues. Dirac also offers Bass Control for subwoofer integration and ART for more advanced speaker cooperation and resonance control in compatible systems.

AudioBro does not replace that. It does not install filters inside your AVR, processor, or computer audio chain the way Dirac Live can. It is not a DSP engine.

Instead, AudioBro is more of a diagnostic and decision-support layer. It can help users understand whether the problem is placement, seating, reflections, subwoofer location, crossover choices, calibration settings, or room behavior before they start applying correction. It may also help people interpret what Dirac, Audyssey, ARC Genesis, YPAO, RoomPerfect, or REW are already telling them.

In other words, Dirac asks, “How do we correct this system?” AudioBro asks, “What is wrong with this setup, and what should we fix first?”

Those are related questions, but they are not identical.

A properly set up Dirac system can be extremely powerful. But room correction is not a permission slip to place speakers badly, ignore subwoofer position, or pretend glass walls are acoustic treatment. AudioBro’s room-first approach is useful precisely because it focuses on the physical setup before assuming software can clean up the entire crime scene.

Who Is AudioBro For?

AudioBro is probably best suited to three types of users.

The first is the serious two-channel listener who owns good equipment but feels the sound is flat, boomy, vague, bright, or poorly focused. That person may not need new speakers. They may need better placement, a different listening position, basic treatment, or a clearer understanding of how the room is interacting with the system.

The second is the home theater owner who keeps adjusting dialogue, bass, and surround levels but never gets the system to lock in. Center-channel aim, subwoofer integration, seating position, crossover settings, and room layout can all sabotage an otherwise capable system.

The third is the measurement-curious user who has REW, Dirac, Audyssey, ARC Genesis, YPAO, or RoomPerfect data but does not fully understand what the results mean. AudioBro Pro and the Measurement Review option seem aimed directly at that group.

It is probably not for people who already work confidently with REW, understand modal behavior, know how to integrate multiple subwoofers, and can interpret calibration data without needing a second opinion. Those people may still find it useful, but they are not the obvious target.

The Bottom Line

AudioBro V2 makes considerably more sense than the original collection of separate tools. Bringing room photographs, REW files, calibration screenshots, placement analysis, and previous recommendations into one conversational workflow gives users a clearer path from “something sounds wrong” to “move this first and measure again.” Room Memory also adds genuine value for anyone changing equipment, integrating multiple subwoofers, or working through more than one room. 

Founder Ateeq Sheikh does not hold a formal acoustical-engineering degree, but he brings more than 30 years of industry experience and currently reviews every paid Room Review personally. That human oversight matters. It does not guarantee that every recommendation will be correct, but it gives the one-off services more credibility than an automated report fired back by a chatbot wearing an imaginary lab coat.

The pricing also gives users several ways in. Starter costs $24.99 per month or $199.90 annually, while Pro costs $49.99 per month or $399.90 annually. For listeners who only need help once, the more sensible options may be the $97 Quick Room Review, $149 Full Room Diagnosis, or $199 Measurement Review. The subscription is easier to justify for users who regularly change equipment, add subwoofers, move house, or enjoy rebuilding their systems every six weeks because financial stability was becoming tedious.

The limitations remain obvious. AudioBro is only as reliable as the photographs, dimensions, screenshots, and measurements supplied by the user, and it still needs stronger public case studies showing detailed before-and-after results. It cannot confirm that the microphone was positioned correctly, that the measurements were valid, or that the user actually followed the advice.

Still, AudioBro V2 could become a useful bridge between forum chaos, intimidating measurement software, automated room correction, and hiring a professional calibrator. Helping listeners fix the room before buying another amplifier, cable, or mystical accessory is a smart idea. AudioBro now needs to prove that its recommendations are consistent, repeatable, and worth paying for.

For more information: audiobro.ai

Related Reading:

Rivian spinoff Also will finally start delivering its first e-bikes to customers next week, after months of delays related to unspecified supply chain issues.

The company told TechCrunch on Friday that the Launch Edition of its TM-B e-bike, which retails for $4,500, has started shipping from its manufacturer to its warehouse in the U.S. Also said it expects to deliver all Launch Edition bikes between next week and September.

Also began as a skunkworks project inside Rivian in 2022, after CEO RJ Scaringe started looking into making an e-bike to complement his portfolio of electric vehicles for the outdoorsy set. The company spent a few years tinkering with the idea, and even hired Jony Ive’s design firm LoveFrom to help with an early design, as TechCrunch first reported in 2025.

In March 2025, Rivian spun out Also as its own company, with $105 million in backing from Eclipse. The startup revealed its first e-bike, the TM-B, in October of last year. It originally targeted a “spring” 2026 ship date, but supply chain headaches got in the way, and the company pushed the delivery window to July.

“The primary factor driving our updated summer timeline is current stress on global supply chains. A rapid, industry-wide spike in demand for raw materials and electronic components has impacted key parts required for the TM-B. This has temporarily delayed our planned manufacturing ramp-up and pushed our first delivery dates past our original spring window,” the company wrote in June on a support page. “Our engineering and production teams are working around the clock to minimize these constraints without cutting a single corner on safety or quality.”

Also declined to say what components, specifically, caused the delay.

Also has big plans beyond the TM-B. The startup mostly refers to itself as a “vehicle” company and has plans to make four-wheel pedal-assist cargo vehicles for Amazon. The company is working on an autonomous delivery vehicle for DoorDash, too.

But for now, Also needs to focus on delivering its first e-bikes while navigating the next set of headaches for a company shipping products like these: customer service. On Friday, the last day of July, a number of customers were venting in a thread in the r/ALSOmicromobility subreddit about the repeated delays.

“I’m really frustrated by the lack of communication and the actual miscommunication/lies from Also regarding shipment timelines,” the original poster wrote. “Why do they keep making these promises about shipping timelines just to blow right past them without any communication or actual updates? It really makes no sense.”

“Hey we’ve still got a few business hours left in July. Maybe we’ll get an email later this morning ☺️,” a different user responded.

Not everyone was so patient.

“Couldn’t wait any longer and canceled my reservation,” another wrote.

The big picture: Putting your writing on the open web used to mean people could read it. Now, it also means dozens of crawlers can copy it into training datasets. Sure, anti-scraping tools such as robots.txt exist, but they only work if the bots themselves agree to stay away, which doesn’t always happen. Stricter measures were clearly needed, and now they have arrived in an innovative new form.

A Brazilian creative studio called Seneda & Abrucio has teamed up with Playtype, a Copenhagen-based type foundry, to build something that doesn’t rely on asking nicely to keep crawlers away. They call it ShieldFont, and it’s essentially a free, open-source web font with a twist. It works by showing you one sentence while presenting an AI scraper with a completely different one.

The thing is, you see rendered pixels on a screen. Most mass scrapers, on the other hand, simply grab the raw HTML underneath. ShieldFont exploits this difference through an automated process called OpenType glyph substitution. This technology is normally used to replace one or more typed characters with alternate glyphs that improve how text is rendered. In this case, however, entire words are swapped out, meaning a scraper can pick up only gibberish from the webpage.

Those swapped words are not picked at random, however. The studio’s dictionary pairs every word with another of the same grammatical type, so nouns get nouns and past-tense verbs get past-tense verbs. The words are sorted into roughly 250 pools that account for factors such as whether a noun is abstract or plural. About a quarter of the words in any given block are swapped this way.

Keeping the grammar clean matters because AI firms run scraped text through quality filters that discard anything that reads like nonsense. Seneda & Abrucio ran shielded text through FineWeb-Edu, a quality filter used to assemble a large public training dataset, and found that about one in 10 passages that passed before shielding still passed afterward.

Whatever gets through is fluent enough to be retained yet wrong enough to be useless at the same time. In fact, 55.8% of shielded passages in the studio’s testing no longer made the original factual claim.

That said, because the whole defense rests on scrapers reading code rather than screens, taking a screenshot of a shielded page and running OCR on the image can still recover the real words. Screen readers used by blind readers also work from the code, so they read the decoys aloud. ShieldFont ships with a beta feature that provides those readers with the real text instead.

For now, ShieldFont only handles English. The code can be found on GitHub for anyone who wants it. Developers and writers can simply install it as a React component to their websites.

Cyber-crime

History suggests this was not wise

Would you trust a ransomware extortionist to delete the data they stole? One bank certainly wants you to. Well over a month into a ransomware cleanup job, River Financial Corporation tells regulators that it “took steps to attempt to suppress the affected data, including obtaining representations from the threat actor that it deleted the data in its possession.”

For context, placing this kind of trust in this kind of individual has been proven to be a bad idea. When globo-cops took down LockBit in 2024, they found evidence that victim data was retained even after the victim had paid the extortion demands.

In its Form 8-K filing with the SEC, River Bank did not explicitly state whether or not it paid any of the criminals’ ransom demands, although ransomware crooks are not commonly known to offer a victim data deletion for free.

The Register asked the company for a more explicit comment on this matter, but it did not immediately respond.

River Bank first disclosed its cyber woes to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 16, admitting from the outset that ransomware had been deployed across portions of its servers.

In response, it took affected systems offline, disabled admin accounts, and brought in external incident responders to determine the full scope of the damage.

Only July 6, messaging suggested it was aware that some data was “potentially impacted” by the attack, before admitting that certain data was removed from its environment four days later.

By July 10, River was aware the data had been removed, and two class action lawsuits had been filed against it, to top things off.

A week later, it told investors that an additional two class actions had been filed, bringing the total to four.

River has not yet completed its investigation, per its most recent filing, and therefore has not confirmed the full scope or impact of the attack. ®