Connect with us

Tech

YouTube TV vs. Fubo vs. Hulu Live vs. Sling and More: 100 Top Live TV Streaming Channels Compared

Published

on

Before you’re tempted to attach yourself to a cable subscription, maybe it’s time to consider a live TV streaming service and let the cord go. The number of packages available today — for every kind of budget — is on the rise; however, live TV streaming services allow you to avoid those annoying contracts. They also offer a variety of channels, DVR and the ability to stream sports and other content. Plus, most services let you watch on your laptop or phone.  

Monthly pricing and regional sports networks can make it a challenge when choosing a live TV streamer but six main services to consider (we’re not including smaller ones) are FuboPhiloSling TVDirecTVYouTube TV and Hulu Plus Live TV

Advertisement

It really boils down to the channels, right? We’ve examined which platforms feature the most top 100 channels in their main lineups to help you determine which one is best for your household.

The Big Chart: Top 100 channels compared (updated Feb. 2026)

The main difference between the services lies in their channel selection. All of them offer different lineups of channels for various prices. 

Below, you’ll find a chart that shows the top 100 channels across all six services. Note that not every service has a worthy 100. There are actually seven listed because Sling TV has two “base” tiers, Orange and Blue. And if you’re wondering, I chose which “top” channels made the cut. Sorry, AXS TV, Discovery Life, GSN and Universal HD.

Fubo and NBCUniversal still have not resolved their carriage dispute, resulting in a gap in Fubo’s channel lineup but a drop in monthly subscription prices. DirecTV offers signature streaming packages, and its basic plan starts at $90 per month, plus fees (excluding promotional rates). With channel losses and price hikes, some of the services may seem less appealing.

Advertisement

Sling TV has made some changes to its Blue package in 2026. The price is $46 a month if you don’t have any local stations but the price has increased by $4 for those who do. If you have one or two local networks, such as NBC or Fox, the monthly rate is $50. Customers with three or more local stations in their Sling Blue package now pay $55 per month. 

Philo offers a small roster but packages HBO Max, Discovery Plus and AMC Plus access with it at no extra charge. But costs continue to go up and those changes are reflected in the chart below where applicable. 

Some more stuff to know about the chart: 

  • Yes = The channel is available on the cheapest pricing tier. That price is listed next to the service’s name.
  • No = The channel isn’t available at all on that service. 
  • $ = The channel is available for an extra fee, either a la carte or as part of a more expensive package or add-on.
  • Regional sports networks — local channels devoted to showing regular-season games of particular pro baseball, basketball and hockey teams — are not listed. DirecTV’s $130 tier has the most RSNs by far, but a few are available on other services. You can also check out its MySports package for $70 and Xfinity’s sports and news offering.
  • Local ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC, MyNetworkTV and The CW networks are not available in every city. Because the availability of these channels varies, you’ll want to check the service’s website to verify that it carries your local network.
  • Local PBS stations are only currently available on DirecTV, Hulu Live and YouTube TV. Again, you’ll want to check local availability.
  • Sling Blue subscribers in cities like Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City pay extra for access to channels like NBC and ABC. Check Sling’s site to see which local channels are available in your area.
  • Fubo subscribers get an $11 price decrease on its Pro and Elite plans amid the NBCU carriage dispute, but you may find that the ACC Network and SEC Network are included with the TV package at no extra cost. Check availability for your state.
  • The chart columns are arranged in order of price, so if you can’t see everything you want, try scrolling right.
  • Overwhelmed? An easier-to-understand Google Spreadsheet is here.

Philo vs. Sling TV vs. Fubo vs. YouTube TV vs. DirecTV vs. Hulu: Top 100 channels compared

Advertisement

Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) Fubo ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
Total channels: 43 24 34 39 78 56 75
ABC No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
CBS No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fox No No Yes (some markets) Yes Yes Yes Yes
NBC No No Yes (some markets0 No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
PBS No No No No Yes Yes Yes
CW No No No Yes Yes Yes (limited) Yes
MyNetworkTV No No No No Yes Yes Yes
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) Fubo ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
A&E Yes Yes Yes No No $ Yes
ACC Network No $ No Yes Yes $ Yes
Accuweather Yes No No Yes No Yes No
AMC Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Animal Planet Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes
BBC America Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
BBC World News Yes $ $ No Yes $ No
BET Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Big Ten Network No No $ Yes Yes $ Yes
Bloomberg TV No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Boomerang No $ $ No No Yes $
Bravo No No Yes No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) Fubo ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
Cartoon Network No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
CBS Sports Network No No No Yes Yes $ Yes
Cheddar Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cinemax No No No No $ $ $
CMT Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
CNBC No No $ No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
CNN No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Comedy Central Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cooking Channel Yes $ $ $ No $ $
Destination America Yes $ $ $ No $ $
Discovery Channel Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Disney Channel No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Disney Junior No $ No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Disney XD No $ No Yes Yes Yes Yes
E! No No Yes No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
ESPN No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
ESPN 2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
ESPNEWS No $ No $ Yes $ Yes
ESPNU No $ No $ Yes $ Yes
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) Fubo ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
Food Network Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Fox Business No No $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fox News No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
FS1 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
FS2 No No $ Yes Yes $ Yes
Freeform No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
FX No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
FX Movies No No $ $ Yes $ Yes
FXX No No $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
FYI Yes $ $ No No $ Yes
Golf Channel No No $ No (due to carriage dispute) Yes $ Yes
Hallmark Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
HBO/Max No No No No $ $ $
HGTV Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
History Yes Yes Yes No No $ Yes
HLN No $ Yes No Yes Yes Yes
IFC Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Investigation Discovery Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Lifetime Yes Yes Yes No No $ Yes
Lifetime Movie Network Yes $ $ No No $ Yes
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) FuboTV ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
Magnolia Network Yes $ $ No Yes $ Yes
MeTV Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
MGM+ $ $ $ No $ $ No
MLB Network No $ $ $ No $ Yes
Motor Trend Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes
MSNBC No No Yes No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
MTV Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
MTV2 Yes $ $ $ Yes Yes $
National Geographic No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Nat Geo Wild No No $ $ Yes $ Yes
NBA TV No $ $ $ Yes $ No
NFL Network No No Yes Yes Yes $ Yes
NFL Red Zone No No $ $ $ No $
NHL Network No $ $ $ No $ No
Nickelodeon Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Nick Jr. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes $ Yes
Nicktoons Yes $ $ $ Yes $ $
OWN Yes No No No Yes $ Yes
Oxygen No No $ Yes Yes $ Yes
Paramount Network Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
Science Yes $ $ $ No $ $
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) FuboTV ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)
SEC Network No $ No $ Yes $ Yes
Showtime No $ $ $ $ $ $
Smithsonian Yes No No Yes Yes $ Yes
Starz $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Sundance TV Yes $ $ No Yes Yes No
Syfy No No Yes No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
Tastemade Yes $ $ Yes Yes $ No
TBS No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
TCM No $ $ No Yes $ Yes
TeenNick Yes $ $ $ Yes Yes $
Telemundo No No No Yes Yes $ Yes
Tennis Channel No $ $ $ No $ No
TLC Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
TNT No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Travel Channel Yes Yes Yes No Yes $ Yes
TruTV No $ Yes No Yes $ Yes
TV Land Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
USA Network No No Yes No (due to carriage dispute) Yes Yes Yes
VH1 Yes $ $ Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vice Yes Yes Yes No No $ Yes
WE tv Yes $ $ No Yes Yes No
Channel Philo ($33) Sling Orange ($46) Sling Blue ($46) FuboTV ($74) YouTube TV ($83) DirecTV ($90) Hulu with Live TV ($90)

James Martin/CNET

Hulu Plus Live TV, which includes access to Disney Plus, Hulu on-demand and ESPN Plus, is one of the most expensive platforms, now at $90 a month for its base package. Its channel selection isn’t as robust as YouTube TV, but Hulu’s significant catalog of on-demand content sets it apart. ABC shows like High Potential and exclusive titles such as Shōgun, The Bear and Only Murders in the Building give it a content advantage.

Live TV subscribers also receive unlimited DVR that includes fast-forwarding and on-demand playback — at no additional cost. It’s a move that has aligned Hulu with its competitors in terms of features but the channel lineup may still be a deciding factor. It’s pricier than YouTube TV, which has more channels, but the access to Disney Plus and ESPN may make it a more appealing choice for you. Read our Hulu Plus Live TV review.

Advertisement

James Martin/CNET

Apart from its current carriage dispute with Disney, YouTube has an excellent channel selection, easy-to-use interface and best-in-class cloud DVR. Typically, the $83-per-month service is one of the best cable TV replacements. It offers a 4K upgrade add-on for an additional price, but the downside is that there isn’t much to watch at present unless you watch select channels. If you don’t mind paying a bit more than the Sling TVs of the world, or want to watch live NBA games, YouTube TV offers a high standard of live TV streaming. Read our YouTube TV review.

Advertisement

Sarah Tew/CNET

If you want to save a little money and don’t mind missing out on local channels, Sling TV is the best of the budget services. Its Orange and Blue packages start at $46 per month, and you can combine them for a monthly rate of $61 (more in some regions). The Orange option nets you one stream, while Blue gives you three. It’s not as comprehensive or as easy to navigate as YouTube TV, but with a bit of work, including adding an antenna or an AirTV 2 DVR, it’s an unbeatable value. We’ll also add that the service offers local channels such as ABC and CBS in some regions, where the monthly rate is $50 or $55. Read our Sling TV review.

Zooey Liao/CNET
Advertisement

DirecTV’s base signature streaming package costs more than all the other platforms on this list  except Hulu Plus Live TV, and its stiffest competition is still Hulu and YouTube TV. With its channel selection, it’s ideal for sports fans who want to watch local or national games. 

The service does have its benefits, though — for example, it includes the flipper-friendly ability to swipe left and right to change channels. Additionally, it includes some channels that some other services can’t, including nearly 250 PBS stations nationwide. The $90 Entertainment package may suit your needs with its 90-plus channels and the inclusion of ESPN Unlimited. But for cord-cutters who want to follow their local NBA or MLB team, DirecTV’s pricier Choice package is a more robust live TV streaming pick because it has access to more regional sports networks than the competition. Nonetheless, you’ll want to make sure your channel is included here and not available on one of our preferred picks before you pony up. Read our DirecTV streaming service review.

Ty Pendlebury/CNET
Advertisement

There’s a lot to like about Fubo — it offers a wide selection of channels and its sports focus makes it especially attractive to soccer fans or NBA, NHL and MLB fans who live in an area served by one of Fubo’s RSNs. It’s also a great choice for NFL fans because it’s one of three services, alongside YouTube TV and Hulu, that offer NFL Network and optional RedZone. The biggest hole in Fubo’s lineup is the lack of Warner Bros. Discovery networks, including Cartoon Network, CNN, Food Network, HGTV, TBS and TNT — especially as the latter two carry a lot of sports content, in particular MLB, NBA and NHL. Its current dispute with NBCU is causing more channel losses (no ABC, Bravo, etc.). Those missing channels, and the $74 price tag for the base plan, make it less attractive than YouTube TV for most viewers. Read our Fubo review.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Philo’s Core plan is now $33 and includes the AMC Plus bundle and HBO Max at no extra cost, and it’s still a cheap live TV streaming service with a variety of channels. But it lacks sports channels, local stations and big-name news networks — although BBC News and Cheddar are available. Philo offers bread-and-butter cable staples like Comedy Central, Hallmark Channel and Nickelodeon, and specializes in lifestyle and reality programming. It’s also one of the most affordable live services that streams Paramount, home of Yellowstone, and includes a cloud DVR, as well as optional add-ons from Hallmark Plus and Starz. We think most people are better off paying a few bucks more for Sling TV’s superior service, but if Philo has every channel you want, it’s a decent deal. Read our Philo review.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Today’s NYT Connections: Sports Edition Hints, Answers for Feb. 14 #509

Published

on

Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.


Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a mix of a little bit of everything. It helps if basketball is your game. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.

Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.

Advertisement

Read more: NYT Connections: Sports Edition Puzzle Comes Out of Beta

Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.

Yellow group hint: Don’t keep playing!

Advertisement

Green group hint: Smash that basketball.

Blue group hint: Hoopster winners.

Purple group hint: Goldy Gopher is another one.

Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups

Yellow group: Signal for play to stop.

Advertisement

Green group: Dunks.

Blue group: NBA 3-point contest winners.

Purple group: College mascots.

Read more: Wordle Cheat Sheet: Here Are the Most Popular Letters Used in English Words

Advertisement

What are today’s Connections: Sports Edition answers?

completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for Feb. 14, 2026

The completed NYT Connections: Sports Edition puzzle for Feb. 14, 2026.

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

The yellow words in today’s Connections

The theme is signal for play to stop. The four answers are buzzer, horn, siren and whistle.

The green words in today’s Connections

The theme is dunks. The four answers are 360, between-the-legs, reverse and windmill.

Advertisement

The blue words in today’s Connections

The theme is NBA 3-point contest winners. The four answers are Herro, Hield, Love and Pierce.

The purple words in today’s Connections

The theme is college mascots. The four answers are Big Al, Brutus, Otto and Rameses.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro review: the classic pro portrait lens, for less

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: one-minute review

I’ve had a busy time reviewing Viltrox lenses this year – including a range of primes such as the cheap and characterful ‘body cap’ 28mm f/4.5 lens, my dream reportage photography 35mm f/1.2 lens, the buttery bokeh-delivering 135mm f/1.8 LAB and the lightweight 50mm f/2 Air. Now, it’s the turn of the AF 85mm F1.4 Pro.

Advertisement

Side barrel of the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro lens in photographer's hand, outdoors and with bronze-colored ferns in the background

Just 15mm in length – Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 is a true body-cap lens, with a much faster f/4.5 aperture than other such optics, including the Panasonic 26mm f/8. If you don’t mind something a little larger and pricier, there are f/2.8 alternatives (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

In the hand, the Viltrox 85mm F1.4 Pro’s rugged build quality is immediately evident – this is a weather-sealed metal lens, with a range of external controls for photo and video work, even if it lacks the digital display found in Viltrox’s flagship ‘LAB’ lenses.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

DCU, UL research could help avoid cancer drug resistance

Published

on

The team says this new chemical strategy could avoid some of the typical mechanisms that cancers use to become resistant.

A consortium that includes scientists from Dublin City University (DCU) and the University of Limerick (UL) has developed a new chemical strategy for designing metal-based compounds capable of damaging cancer cell DNA.

The team includes researchers from Chimie ParisTech from France, and Chalmers University of Technology and the Sahlgrenska University Hospital from Sweden.

Led by DCU’s Prof Andrew Kellet, the European consortium has created a series of molecules that cut DNA through a distinct chemical mechanism when compared with existing chemotherapy drugs. Their research focuses on early-stage compounds that could form the basis of future therapies, particularly in cancers that become resistant to treatment.

Advertisement

To achieve their results, the scientists used “click chemistry” – a method used for assembling molecular components – to create a family of compounds known as “tri-click” ligands. When combined with copper ions, these ligands form artificial metal-containing agents designed to cleave DNA.

“Click chemistry has transformed how we build complex molecules, but its potential as a platform to assemble DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics is under-explored,” said Kellet.

“One of the major challenges in cancer treatment is drug resistance. By developing compounds that damage DNA in a different way, we aim to open up new possibilities for overcoming some of the limitations of existing therapies. While this research is still at an early stage, it provides a valuable platform for future drug development.”

Drug resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in cancer treatment. Tumours can adapt by repairing specific forms of DNA damage or by blocking the activity of conventional drugs. According to the team, this new chemical strategy could avoid some of the typical mechanisms that cancers use to become resistant. Their study has been published in the journal Nature.

Advertisement

“This work exemplifies the value of systematic, deep screening of molecular properties in the development of more effective medicines,” said Damien Thompson, the director of SSPC, the Research Ireland Centre for Pharmaceuticals and a professor of molecular modelling at UL.

“Support from SSPC, the Research Ireland Centre for Pharmaceuticals enabled strong collaboration between our experimental and modelling teams and this new design strategy marks a key milestone in developing sustainable, well-tolerated anticancer drugs.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Puzzle of LHS 1903 Reveals an Inside-Out World That Shouldn’t Exist

Published

on

LHS 1903 Inside-Out Star System
LHS 1903 is a tiny red dwarf star in the Lynx constellation, 116 light-years away. This small star is around half the mass of our Sun and emits a faint glow that is scarcely visible against the night sky. Nonetheless, subsequent observations have revealed a system of four planets, and what they’re exhibiting is a pattern that utterly contradicts our assumptions.


LHS 1903 Inside-Out Star System
The planets are grouped in the opposite order you’d expect: rocky, gaseous, gaseous, rocky, from innermost to outermost. The innermost planet, LHS 1903 b, is a dense super-Earth roughly 40% larger in radius than our own Earth, and it orbits in a blistering hot loop that lasts a few days. Its neighbor, LHS 1903 c, is joined in its orbit by LHS 1903 d; both are sub-Neptunes with thick gaseous envelopes, but that makes them less dense than rocky worlds of a similar mass, and because they’re a bit farther out, they’re in a cooler zone where the gas probably hung around during their formation.


LEGO Icons Shuttle Carrier Aircraft Building Set for Adults – Spaceship & Airplane Model Kit for Adults…
  • 2 AVIATION LEGENDS, 1 BUILD – Recreate the iconic Boeing 747 and NASA Space Shuttle Enterprise with the LEGO Icons Shuttle Carrier Aircraft…
  • DEPLOY LANDING GEAR – Turn the dial to extend the massive 18-wheel landing system on your airplane model, just like real flight operations
  • AUTHENTIC FEATURES & DETAILS – Remove the tail cone, engines, and landing gear from the NASA shuttle and stow them in the cargo bay during flight

Then there’s the surprise: LHS 1903 e, the outermost planet. At approximately 1.7 times the size of Earth, it is classified as a super-Earth, although density data indicate that it is composed of stony material with no major gaseous layer. Overall, it takes around 29 and a half days for this faraway globe to circle its star, which is far enough away to have a rather gaseous atmosphere, according to standard models.

LHS 1903 Inside-Out Star System
Astronomers discovered three of these planets using NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), which detects tiny dips in sunlight as a planet passes in front of its star. Ground-based telescopes were then used to pinpoint their presence. However, it took data from the European Space Agency’s CHEOPS satellite to establish the presence of that fourth planet, a precision sensor capable of measuring exoplanet transits and providing a more thorough perspective of faraway worlds.

Thomas Wilson of the University of Warwick, the lead author of a recent study published in Science, sees this arrangement as obvious indication of something unusual going on. Usually, rocky planets appear after gas-rich ones, but this time it’s the opposite. The scientists tested various theories to see if they could come up with a different explanation, such as planets moving orbits or colliding in ways that took away their atmospheres, but they just did not hold up to the evidence.

LHS 1903 Inside-Out Star System
Instead, what they’re seeing appears to indicate an inside-out formation. Planets most likely formed one at a time from a swirling cloud of dust and gas, rather than simultaneously. The inner rocky planet most likely formed first and absorbed all of the neighboring material, followed by the two gaseous planets, which grabbed some gas while it was still plenty. By the time the outer rocky planet began to develop, the gas had nearly evaporated, leaving it with little alternative but to build entirely from solid material. This makes the outer planet a bit of a late bloomer, a process that previously seemed improbable, but now has direct evidence to back it up.
[Source]

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why the Razer Kishi Ultra Gaming Controller Might be the Best Yet for Android, iPhone, iPad, PC and More

Published

on

Razer Kishi Ultra Gaming Controller
The Razer Kishi Ultra is undoubtedly the best option for anyone who takes mobile gaming seriously, whether on a phone or a small tablet. A variety of features work together to make it seem like a high-end controller. So the full-sized grips on this thing allow your hands to rest comfortably, much like holding a pair of Xbox controllers connected together in the middle. Smaller clip-on alternatives can become cramped after a time, but the Kishi Ultra avoids that. The comfort level is really high, to the point that you can play Genshin Impact, Call of Duty Mobile, or stream from a PC for hours without your hands suffering.



In terms of controls, the Kishi Ultra meets the expectations of serious gamers looking for a professional-grade controller. The analogue sticks feature high-quality sensors that are extremely accurate and can withstand extensive use without drifting. The triggers use Hall Effect technology to provide smooth, precise input, similar to what you’d get from a specialized controller rather than the finicky outdated components found in some other solutions. The mecha-tactile buttons and 8-way d-pad provide excellent response with each press, and the additional programmable buttons on the back allow you to quickly access commands without shifting your grip.

Sale


Razer Kishi Ultra Gaming Controller for Android, iPhone 15 & 16 Series, iPad Mini A17 Pro & 6 (USB C…
  • PC REMOTE PLAY — The power of a gaming rig now fits the size of a pocket; stream games using a PC and launch them directly from mobile devices for…
  • FULL-SIZED FORM FACTOR FOR PHONES AND IPAD MINI — Game directly on a phone or unlock new levels of mobile gaming with tablets up to 8 inches for a…
  • PRO-GRADE CONSOLE CONTROLS and ERGONOMICS ON MOBILE — Dominate Mobile Gaming with the esports grade performance and comfort of Razer’s Pro console…

The Kishi Ultra also provides haptic feedback, adding to the immersion experience. On Android devices, the direction of the vibration corresponds to what is happening in the game, giving you a much better feeling of what is going on. The RGB lighting along the grips is a lovely touch, but it’s modest enough not to distract. The Razer Nexus software allows you to effortlessly map your controls, integrate all of your games across several providers, and manage your streaming setup in one location.

Advertisement


Compatibility-wise the Kishi Ultra is quite comprehensive. It connects directly to iPhone 15 and later models via USB-C, as well as a wide range of Android devices, including latest Samsung and Google Pixel phones, and even the iPad Mini (6th generation). It can be stretched to accommodate tablets up to 8 inches in size. Pass-through charging keeps the device charged while you’re playing. If you’re using a Windows PC, the Kishi Ultra also functions as a wired controller, which means you get a zero-latency connection because it’s connected in straight via USB, with none of the tiny delay that comes with Bluetooth.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

MrBeast just bought a financial app for teens to finally teach money skills most adults never learned growing up

Published

on


  • MrBeast buys Step to teach teens how to save, spend, and invest
  • Step offers a Visa card and basic banking without monthly fees
  • The acquisition gives Beast Industries a fintech team and seven million users

Beast Industries has confirmed the acquisition of Step, a youth-focused financial planning app, adding a regulated money product to its expanding list of business ventures.

Beast Industries, controlled by Jimmy Donaldson, popularly known as MrBeast, the world’s largest YouTuber by subscriber count, appears to be extending its activities beyond entertainment and media into financial services.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Cops Criticize Flock Safety After It’s Caught Handing Out Access To Federal Agencies

Published

on

from the betraying-trust-for-the-clicks dept

A California police department is none too happy that its license plate reader records were accessed by federal employees it never gave explicit permission to peruse. And, once again, it’s Flock Safety shrugging itself into another PR black eye.

Mountain View police criticized the company supplying its automated license plate reader system after an audit turned up “unauthorized” use by federal law enforcement agencies.

At least six offices of four agencies accessed data from the first camera in the city’s Flock Safety license-tracking system from August to November 2024 without the police department’s permission or knowledge, according to a press release Friday night.

Flock has been swimming in a cesspool of its own making for several months now, thanks to it being the public face of “How To Hunt Down Someone Who Wanted An Abortion.” That debacle was followed by even more negative press (and congressional rebuke) for its apparent unwillingness to place any limits at all on access to the hundreds of millions of license plate records its cameras have captured, including those owned by private individuals.

Mountain View is in California. And that’s only one problem with everything in this paragraph:

Advertisement

The city said its system was accessed by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives offices in Kentucky and Tennessee, which investigate crimes related to guns, explosives, arson and the illegal trafficking of alcohol and tobacco; the inspector general’s office of the U.S.. General Services Administration, which manages federal buildings, procurement, and property; Air Force bases in Langley, Virginia, and in Ohio; and the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada.

Imagine trying to explain this to anyone. While it’s somewhat understandable that the ATF might be running nationwide searches on Flock’s platform, it’s almost impossible to explain why images captured by a single camera in Mountain View, California were accessed by the Inspector General for the GSA, much less Lake Mead Recreation Area staffers.

This explains how this happened. But it doesn’t do anything to explain why.

They accessed Mountain View’s system for one camera via a “nationwide” search setting that was turned on by Flock Safety, police said.

Apparently, this is neither opt-in or opt-out. It just is. The Mountain View police said they “worked closely” with Flock to block out-of-state access, as well as limit internal access to searches expressly approved by the department’s police chief.

Flock doesn’t seem to care what its customers want. Either it can’t do what this department asked or it simply chose not to because a system that can’t be accessed by government randos scattered around the nation is much tougher to sell than a locked-down portal that actually serves the needs of the people paying for it.

Advertisement

And that tracks with Ron Wyden’s criticism of the company in the letter he wrote to Flock last October:

The privacy protection that Flock promised to Oregonians — that Flock software will automatically examine the reason provided by law enforcement officers for terms indicating an abortion- or immigration-related search — is meaningless when law enforcement officials provide generic reasons like “investigation” or “crime.” Likewise, Flock’s filters are meaningless if no reason for a search is provided in the first place. While the search reasons collected by Flock, obtained by press and activists through open records requests, have occasionally revealed searches for immigration and abortion enforcement, these are likely just the tip of the iceberg. Presumably, most officers using Flock to hunt down immigrants and women who have received abortions are not going to type that in as the reason for their search. And, regardless, given that Flock has washed its hands of any obligation to audit its customers, Flock customers have no reason to trust a search reason provided by another agency.

I now believe that abuses of your product are not only likely but inevitable, and that Flock is unable and uninterested in preventing them.

Flock just keeps making Wyden’s points for him. The PD wanted limited access with actual oversight. Flock gave the PD a lending library of license plate/location images anyone with or without a library card (so to speak) could check out at will. Flock is part of the surveillance problem. And it’s clear it’s happy being a tool that can be readily and easily abused, no matter what its paying customers actually want from its technology.

Filed Under: alpr, atf, california, defense department, gsa, mountain view, surveillance, trump administration

Companies: flock safety

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ultrafide Audio Teases ENSO INT-125 Integrated Amplifier Ahead of Bristol Hi-Fi Show 2026

Published

on

As the Bristol Hi-Fi Show gears up for 2026, early announcements are beginning to surface, and the first one worth paying attention to comes from Ultrafide Audio. The UK manufacturer will unveil its new ENSO INT-125 integrated amplifier, a deliberately traditional design that leans into core amplification fundamentals rather than chasing the current obsession with built-in streaming platforms. The ENSO is confirmed to include an internal DAC, but this is not a network amplifier, not a lifestyle hub, and not trying to replace your music app of choice. It is, quite unapologetically, an integrated amplifier built for people who still care about signal paths more than software updates.

That positioning makes sense once you understand Ultrafide’s roots. Still relatively unknown in North America, the brand is the hi-fi division of MC² Audio and XTA Electronics, two names with serious credibility in the professional audio world. Products are designed and manufactured in East Devon, England, under the guidance of lead engineer Alex Cooper, whose résumé includes MC² Audio’s Delta Series, XTA’s MX36 console switch, and custom guitar amplifiers built for Jimmy Page, Pete Townshend, and Mick Moody.

Ultrafide spent 2025 quietly expanding its footprint with the DIAS high-power amplifier and the more approachable SP500, exporting to over 20 countries. The ENSO INT-125 looks like a natural next step: a stripped-back, musically focused integrated aimed at listeners who want modern digital compatibility without surrendering control to a streaming ecosystem. 

Ultrafide ENSO INT-125 Power, Topology, and Core Functionality

The ENSO is designed to serve as the true center of a system. Its name is drawn from the Japanese enso circle, a symbol of completeness, unity, and balance, themes that carry through both its sonic goals and its restrained, minimalist aesthetic.

Advertisement

Power output is rated at 125 watts per channel into 8 ohms, rising to 2 × 250 watts into 4 ohms, delivered via Ultrafide’s proprietary UltraSigma output topology.

Additional features include full preamplifier controls, tone adjustment options, an OLED display for clear system feedback, and a built-in stereo Class A/B headphone amplifier.

Ultrafide Audio ENSO Integrated Amplifier Rear

Inputs include two RCA and one balanced XLR analog input, along with one optical and one coaxial digital input. A dedicated moving-magnet phono stage is also included for direct turntable connection.

On the output side, the ENSO offers traditional loudspeaker terminals, a configurable preamp/power-amp loop with bypass capability, and a front-panel headphone output.

Advertisement

At its core is a linear toroidal power supply, with circuit design informed by technologies developed for Ultrafide’s U500DC and SP500 power amplifiers. The emphasis here is on clean power delivery, generous headroom, and maintaining musical integrity under real-world loads.

The preamplifier section features an OLED display with full remote control, derived from Ultrafide’s U4PRE, and includes ±8 dB bass and treble adjustment. These tone controls are designed by pro-audio EQ specialist Alex Cooper, who oversees all Ultrafide product development.

A key differentiator is the ENSO’s send/return pre-out and power-in architecture, which allows the amplifier to scale with a system. It can be used as a conventional integrated amplifier with passive loudspeakers, or reconfigured for multi-amplified or fully active systems with external equalisation, offering unusual flexibility at this level.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

The amplifier is housed in Ultrafide’s clean, understated chassis and follows a standard 17-inch (42 cm) width, ensuring straightforward integration into most hi-fi racks and systems.

The ENSO (INT-125) is a huge moment for the Ultrafide brand,” said Mark Bailey, product specialist at Ultrafide Audio and MC² Audio. “It’s a flexible and powerful integrated amplifier that lets you focus on the music. Having been asked for this by many customers since our inception, we are pleased to offer a competitive price point, driven by our mission to make exceptional audio accessible.”

ultrafide-logo

The Bottom Line 

Priced at £3,500, the Ultrafide ENSO INT-125 is aimed squarely at listeners who want a serious, UK-built integrated amplifier with real power, a proper internal DAC, phono support, and system-scaling flexibility without being locked into a streaming platform that will feel obsolete in five years. It’s for traditional hi-fi users who already own a streamer, CD transport, or DAC and would rather choose those components themselves.

What it deliberately omits is just as telling: there’s no built-in streaming, no app ecosystem, no HDMI eARC for TV integration, and it’s unclear whether a dedicated subwoofer output is provided. In a segment crowded with do-everything amplifiers, the ENSO takes the contrarian route; fewer features, more focus, and a clear bias toward sound quality over convenience.

Pricing & Availability

The Ultrafide ENSO (INT-125) is priced at £3,500 (inc. VAT) and is available through authorized Ultrafide dealers. It is not known yet if this product will become available in the North American market.

Advertisement

The ENSO will be shown publicly for the first time at the 2026 Bristol Hi-Fi Show from 20–22 in Room 314 and will be demoed using Kudos Titan 505 loudspeakers.

bristol-hi-fi-show

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Copyright Kills Competition | Techdirt

Published

on

from the copyright-reform-is-antitrust dept

Copyright owners increasingly claim more draconian copyright law and policy will fight back against big tech companies. In reality, copyright gives the most powerful companies even more control over creators and competitors. Today’s copyright policy concentrates power among a handful of corporate gatekeepers—at everyone else’s expense. We need a system that supports grassroots innovation and emerging creators by lowering barriers to entry—ultimately offering all of us a wider variety of choices.

Pro-monopoly regulation through copyright won’t provide any meaningful economic support for vulnerable artists and creators. Because of the imbalance in bargaining power between creators and publishing gatekeepers, trying to help creators by giving them new rights under copyright law is like trying to help a bullied kid by giving them more lunch money for the bully to take.

Entertainment companies’ historical practices bear out this concern. For example, in the late-2000’s to mid-2010’s, music publishers and recording companies struck multimillion-dollar direct licensing deals with music streaming companies and video sharing platforms. Google reportedly paid more than $400 million to a single music label, and Spotify gave the major record labels a combined 18 percent ownership interest in its now- $100 billion company. Yet music labels and publishers frequently fail to share these payments with artists, and artists rarely benefit from these equity arrangements. There’s no reason to think that these same companies would treat their artists more fairly now.

AI Training

In the AI era, copyright may seem like a good way to prevent big tech from profiting from AI at individual creators’ expense—it’s not. In fact, the opposite is true. Developing a large language model requires developers to train the model on millions of works. Requiring developers to license enough AI training data to build a large language model would  limit competition to all but the largest corporations—those that either have their own trove of training data or can afford to strike a deal with one that does. This would result in all the usual harms of limited competition, like higher costs, worse service, and heightened security risks. New, beneficial AI tools that allow people to express themselves or access information.

Advertisement

Legacy gatekeepers have already used copyright to stifle access to information and the creation of new tools for understanding it. Consider, for example, Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, the first of many copyright lawsuits over the use of works train AI. ROSS Intelligence was a legal research startup that built an AI-based tool to compete with ubiquitous legal research platforms like Lexis and Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw. ROSS trained its tool using “West headnotes” that Thomson Reuters adds to the legal decisions it publishes, paraphrasing the individual legal conclusions (what lawyers call “holdings”) that the headnotes identified. The tool didn’t output any of the headnotes, but Thomson Reuters sued ROSS anyways. A federal appeals court is still considering the key copyright issues in the case—which EFF weighed in on last year. EFF hopes that the appeals court will reject this overbroad interpretation of copyright law. But in the meantime, the case has already forced the startup out of business, eliminating a would-be competitor that might have helped increase access to the law.

Requiring developers to license AI training materials benefits tech monopolists as well. For giant tech companies that can afford to pay, pricey licensing deals offer a way to lock in their dominant positions in the generative AI market by creating prohibitive barriers to entry. The cost of licensing enough works to train an LLM would be prohibitively expensive for most would-be competitors.

The DMCA’s “Anti-Circumvention” Provision

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s “anti-circumvention” provision is another case in point. Congress ostensibly passed the DMCA to discourage would-be infringers from defeating Digital Rights Management (DRM) and other access controls and copy restrictions on creative works.

In practice, it’s done little to deter infringement—after all, large-scale infringement already invites massive legal penalties. Instead, Section 1201 has been used to block competition and innovation in everything from printer cartridges to garage door openers, videogame console accessories, and computer maintenance services. It’s been used to threaten hobbyists who wanted to make their devices and games work better. And the problem only gets worse as software shows up in more and more places, from phones to cars to refrigerators to farm equipment. If that software is locked up behind DRM, interoperating with it so you can offer add-on services may require circumvention. As a result, manufacturers get complete control over their products, long after they are purchased, and can even shut down secondary markets (as Lexmark did for printer ink, and Microsoft tried to do for Xbox memory cards.)

Advertisement

Giving rights holders a veto on new competition and innovation hurts consumers. Instead, we need balanced copyright policy that rewards consumers without impeding competition.

Republished from the EFF’s Deeplinks blog.

Filed Under: ai, anti-circumvention, competition, copyright, dmca, dmca 1201, fair use

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Best Robot Lawn Mower 2026: Automate your lawn mowing

Published

on

For more challenging garden terrains, whether uneven or sloped, the Mammotion Luba Mini AWD 800 is an easy recommendation, thanks to its rugged design and four-wheel drive. Plus, with its brilliant built-in cameras and RTK navigation system, the undeniably high price is easily justified. 

Although it’s rugged, it’s worth noting that the Luba Mini AWD 800 is designed for gardens up to 800m2. 

The main reason to opt for the Luba Mini AWD 800 is the four wheel drive, which we found enabled the robot to handle uneven terrain with absolute ease. 

Setting up the robot itself wasn’t too much of a challenge, as it comes with paper instructions and an easy-to-follow guide on the smartphone app. You can operate the robot either via Wi-Fi (which is the easiest way) or via on-board 4G which is available via a subscription service. 

Advertisement

However, the hardest job is setting up the RTK station as it needs clear skies to get a good signal, and getting this right can be difficult if you have overhanging trees or aerial obstructions. 

Otherwise, once you are set up, you can let the Luba find its own way around the garden with automatic mapping or, like the Yuka Mini 800, you can manually drive it around like a remote control car, creating a map and setting no-go zones as you go, which is not only accurate but even somewhat enjoyable. 

When you’ve successfully mapped the garden, the Luba Mini AWD 800 can be left to work its magic. You can adjust its cutting length (between 20mm and 65mm) via the app, with the level of customisation available some of the best we’ve seen from a robot lawn mower. 

Thanks to its off-road capabilities and brilliant cutting, the mower was able to navigate well through the garden, without bumping into obstacles, and leave the grass evenly cut.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025