Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

‘A trend that can’t be ignored’: Dems have made up ground in nearly every election since Trump took office

Published

on

‘A trend that can’t be ignored’: Dems have made up ground in nearly every election since Trump took office

In some other year, Analilia Mejia’s 20-point win in New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District might have been a stunning result.

But the progressive organizer’s romp on Thursday elicited little shock, despite the margin in a district former Vice President Kamala Harris had carried by just 8 points.

It was the latest in a long string of Democratic overperformances in elections since President Donald Trump took office last year, and nowhere near the biggest.

A POLITICO analysis of 229 state and federal elections since Trump’s inauguration shows Democratic candidates outperformed Harris in 193 of them. On average, Democratic candidates overperformed Harris by 5 points. In a handful of special elections, they have pulled more than 20 points to the left.

Advertisement

It is a warning sign for Republicans that has continued to flash across the country every few weeks. Consistent overperformances in special elections have been an indicator of midterm shifts in the past, and the trend over the last 15 months is particularly strong. In the two-year cycle of special elections heading into 2018, margins shifted to the left in about two-thirds of special elections, according to The Downballot. In November of that year, Democrats netted 40 seats.

This cycle, Democrats have shifted races left in close to 85 percent of special elections.

“The overperformance across the country in special election after special election is a trend that can’t be ignored and proof that the American people are souring on Republicans’ broken promises,” Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Aidan Johnson said in a statement.

Of course, eye-popping double-digit shifts in some special elections don’t mean every seat that Trump won by 10 points is going to be in play in November. And part of the strong numbers comes from comparing candidates to Harris, who did worse in 2024 than down-ballot Democrats on the same ballot. For example, in New Jersey’s 11st District, then-Rep. Mike Sherrill won by just shy of 15 points while Harris won by 8. Mejia, in the special election, won by 20.

Advertisement

“Outperforming the most unpopular Democratic presidential nominee in history is an abysmally low bar, and touting it as an achievement is embarrassing,” National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesperson Bernadette Breslin said.

And turnout in the special elections is generally much lower than in a midterm or presidential election. National Republicans argue the midterms will be different when turnout is higher.

“Democrats are cherry-picking low-turnout special elections to spin a narrative that falls apart the second you look at the full picture,” National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Mike Marinella said in a statement. “Republicans have the money, the message, and the momentum heading into 2026, and we are outpacing Democrats where it counts in the battlegrounds that will decide the majority.”

But Democrats’ improvements compared to 2024 extend across races and districts that are very different from one another, including special elections for the House and state legislative seats, as well as regular gubernatorial and legislative elections in Virginia and New Jersey last year. The consistent progress for Democrats has come across red and blue districts, swing and safe states — and is a signal going into the midterms that the political environment has shifted since 2024.

Advertisement

Morgan Bonwell, an Iowa-based Republican strategist, said Trump’s victory catalyzed Democratic voters to turn out.

“That fired Democrats up. They had a big loss,” she said. “They had an opportunity right there again to come out and turn out.”

The data reveals that Democrats’ improvements are not just a product of partisan voters in deep-blue areas: Most were in districts where Trump beat Harris. The largest gain was in a Trump-won Brooklyn state Senate district where the Democratic candidate improved on Harris’ vote share by 45 percentage points, followed by state legislative races in Rhode Island and Oklahoma that swung 28 and 27 points, respectively.

Republicans’ largest gain was in a February special election for an Alabama state legislative seat, where the GOP candidate ran 13 points ahead of Trump.

Advertisement

Democratic strategist Fred Hicks said he’s encouraged by voters reengaging with the party after an uninspiring 2024 that saw former President Joe Biden drop out from the presidential race and Harris’ abbreviated campaign fail to prevent Trump’s reelection.

“Trump’s decisions and his announcements sobered up Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters right away, so that people realized they didn’t have the luxury of sitting in their feelings,” Hicks said.

Another encouraging sign for Democrats is that some of the state legislative elections have overlapped with congressional battlegrounds. Three state legislative special elections in Iowa, for example, occurred within the bounds of the state’s 1st and 3rd Congressional Districts — top Democratic targets held by GOP Reps. Mariannette Miller-Meeks and Zach Nunn. In each of those special elections, the Democratic candidate outperformed Harris’ 2024 margin by between 12 and 13 percentage points.

Bonwell, the Iowa-based Republican strategist, warned that Miller-Meeks, Nunn and the rest of the GOP slate in Iowa will need to coordinate closely to match Democrats’ turnout in November, especially with strong candidates like Democratic gubernatorial candidate Rob Sand, who she says “has the ability to drive turnout.”

Advertisement

“They need to be a united front, and they need to pool resources, in my opinion, to bring them all up,” she said. “I think it’ll be challenging for sure.”

Other special elections have occurred in some of the biggest Senate battlegrounds. Since last year, there have been six state legislative special elections in Georgia, and all shifted between 2 and 10 points toward Democrats. The congressional special election for former Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s seat saw a Democrat surpass Harris’ margin in the district by 13 points. Two other special elections were in Maine — one swung 6 points toward Democrats, and the other moved by less than a point toward the GOP.

Democrats’ overperformance comes despite consistently low favorability for the party since 2025. North Carolina-based Democratic strategist Doug Wilson credited that to a focus on kitchen-table issues — the blueprint of the “affordability” playbook used by successful Democratic campaigns over the past year.

“I know that the party’s brand is still not where it once was, but at the same time, I think the Democrats have done a good job of getting back to what I call Democratic roots,” Wilson said. “Remembering what it was like to be that man or that woman that’s keeping themselves up at night worrying about how they’re going to feed their families, how they’re going to put gas in the car, how they’re even going to save for retirement.”

Advertisement

There are still unknown factors that could shape the midterm environment. In the 2022 election cycle, Democrats struggled in special elections until the Dobbs decision brought abortion rights to the forefront, then went on a winning streak, culminating in a midterm that had mixed results for both parties.

But for now, the trend has Democrats raising their expectations for November. Democratic strategist Alex Kellner said they could be heading for a massive wave of victories reminiscent of Republicans’ huge win in the 2010 midterms.

“The ceiling is higher for Democrats than it has been in a long time for a big pickup,” Kellner said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

LIVE: Farage and Yusuf Announce Review of Granted Asylum Claims

Published

on

Nigel Farage and Yusuf are in Millbank Tower “to announce new plans to reverse illegal migration.” Reform says it will review all asylum claims granted in the last five years. It expects to make 400,000 liable for deportation with the plans…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

21 Best Outdoor Dinnerware And Tablecloth Buys For Spring 2026 Entertaining

Published

on

21 Best Outdoor Dinnerware And Tablecloth Buys For Spring 2026 Entertaining

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

No one will admit it, but we’re all secretly fighting for the spot of the best hostess.

Especially when it comes to summer – there are way too many outdoor dining opportunities to pass up to not have your garden ready for any social event you can think of.

It’s all part of the experience of summer: sipping on a glass of wine or Aperol, picking at various carbs, veggies and dips, and giggling late into the evening.

Advertisement

Just like any other occasion, you want to look cute while you’re doing it, and that includes giving your table a makeover ahead of all the guests that will soon be flooding it.

So whether you’re more of a barbecue, brunch, or boozy gathering type host, we’ve found all of the tableware you need to accessorise your garden get togethers this summer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The House | Families In Greatest Need Of Social Housing Wait Years In Some Areas, Data Reveals

Published

on

Families In Greatest Need Of Social Housing Wait Years In Some Areas, Data Reveals
Families In Greatest Need Of Social Housing Wait Years In Some Areas, Data Reveals

Illustration by Tracy Worrall


8 min read

A data investigation by The House has revealed that those with the greatest needs are being forced to wait years for social housing, leaving families in a miserable limbo. Chaminda Jayanetti reports

Advertisement

People with the greatest housing needs are waiting months or even years in the highest priority bands of councils’ social housing registers in many parts of England, according to data compiled by The House.

In some local authorities, people in the highest priority band are placed in social housing after waits of more than two years. Among those in this band who have not yet been rehoused the waits are even longer.

Recent years have seen many reports of overall waiting times for social housing lasting many years in parts of London, but these tend to cover everyone on the waiting list, including people in low priority bands.

Advertisement

Figures obtained by The House under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act focus specifically on people in each council’s highest priority band – which are meant to cater to the most severe housing needs – and separately those in each council’s second-highest priority band.

The figures show that applicants who were placed in social housing by 147 councils in 2024-25 had on average spent 319 days – around 10 months – in their council’s highest housing priority band. In 40 council areas the average wait in the highest priority band was more than a year.

Among applicants who had not been rehoused at the point that councils responded to the FOI request, the average wait in the highest priority band was 551 days and counting – around a year and a half – across the 152 councils that supplied this data.

Advertisement

The average wait in councils’ second-highest priority bands was 501 days for applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024-25, and 669 days for applicants who were not rehoused.

Overall, there are around 300 councils in England responsible for maintaining housing registers, the waiting lists for social housing.

Deborah Garvie, policy manager at housing charity Shelter, says the long wait times are due to the “absolutely chronic shortage” of social rent homes.

“In some areas a lot of the households on the waiting list will be families that need family homes. So, if most of what comes up [as available] is one-bedroom flats, that’s not going to be suitable for them, particularly where people might need a larger family home.”

Advertisement

“People on the housing register often have extremely limited options for rehousing and can spend years in unsuitable or overcrowded accommodation with very little clarity on when, or if, their situation will improve,” adds Niki Lampaski, a housing activist in Hackney. “That creates a constant sense of living in limbo.”

“Being stuck on social housing waiting lists means putting our lives on hold for months and years,” says Laura Vicinanza of disabled people’s organisation Inclusion London. “The consequence is living in homes that do not meet our needs. Homes where we struggle to get in and out of the front door. Homes where we cannot access basic facilities like kitchens and bathrooms.”

“For families with disabled children, the situation can be particularly distressing,” Lampaski adds. “When medical or disability needs are involved, families often have to repeatedly evidence and re-explain the extent of their child’s condition through assessments, reviews and appeals. This leads to long periods of back and forth with the council, adding further barriers and delays with little prospect of resolution.”

Separate data published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) shows that the percentage of new mainstream social housing lettings that went to people who’d been on the waiting list for less than a year fell in 2024/25 to 50.7 per cent, its lowest level since the data was first published in 2018/19.

Advertisement

There’s the impact of conditions in temporary accommodation… often very cramped, with families living in one room, having to share beds

Garvie says long waits for social housing mean families who have been made homeless get stuck in often unsuitable temporary accommodation for extended periods – which brings its own knock-on costs.

“A lot of temporary accommodation doesn’t have access to Wi-Fi, there are no laundry facilities so you’re having to pay for laundry, there’s often no or inadequate cooking facilities so you can’t bulk buy food or batch cook, or in some cases you’re having to buy takeaways and ready meals which are obviously very expensive,” she says.

Advertisement

“And then there’s the impact of conditions in temporary accommodation as well – often very cramped, with families living in one room, having to share beds.”

Greenwich has among the longest waiting times of those councils that supplied figures. Excluding backdated cases, 33 applicants were rehoused into social housing in 2024/25 having spent on average 1,748 days – more than four and a half years – in the council’s highest priority band.

Meanwhile Greenwich’s 212 non-backdated applicants in the top band who are still yet to be rehoused have waited 2,703 days on average – nearly seven and a half years – in that highest priority tier.

The extreme length of wait times in Greenwich may be partly because the council’s highest priority tier – Band A in its housing allocation policy – is geared towards people who the council want to rehouse, rather than who necessarily want to be rehoused themselves. This includes social housing tenants who are under-occupying homes with spare bedrooms, and those living in homes with disability-related adaptations they don’t need.

Advertisement

Some councils said in their FOI responses that their average wait times were pushed up by under-occupying social housing tenants who the council placed in the highest priority band in order to free up family homes, but who rarely bid on properties and are reluctant to move despite potentially being hit by the ‘bedroom tax’.

“Lots of people who are affected by it don’t want to lose their home, and so they may not be bidding on homes even if they’re at the top of the list,” says Garvie. “If they are settled and happy in their home and it’s their family home, then they’re going to try and do their best to hang on to their home, like anyone would.”

Instead, it is Greenwich’s second highest priority tier – Band B1 – that covers homeless people, severely overcrowded housing, insanitary living conditions, domestic abuse and hate crime victims, and households with housing-related medical needs. But they too face ominously long waits – excluding backdated cases, average waits in Band B1 were 761 days for applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024/25, and 1,152 days for those yet to be rehoused – more than two years and three years respectively.

A Greenwich Council spokesperson says: “Our multi-million-pound Greenwich Build programme will deliver 1,750 sustainable new homes, with over 588 homes now complete or underway. This programme is the largest for any local authority in the country and we are on course to rehouse around 2,000 households this year.”

Advertisement

In Hastings, applicants who were placed in social housing in 2024/25 had spent 1,042 days on average in Band A, while those still waiting for housing have spent 709 days in the top tier. Hastings’ Band A covers under-occupiers, but also people whose housing conditions present an immediate threat of serious injury or death, or who urgently need to move to significantly improve their medical condition or disability.

Glenn Haffenden, leader of Hastings Borough Council and lead councillor for housing, says: “We have seen record rises in house prices and rents and with Local Housing Allowance failing to rise alongside rents, residents on lower incomes have found it impossible to meet their own need for housing without seeking help from the council.”

The longest wait times are generally in London, the South East and Essex – but average waits of more than a year can also be found in Coventry, Newark and Sherwood, Bradford, East Suffolk, Cornwall, Chesterfield, Birmingham, Nottingham and Trafford, among others.

Some councils ‘backdate’ certain types of social housing applicant, such as children’s care leavers, to boost their chances of being housed. This can make their average wait times seem longer than they really are. The House’s FOI request specifically asked councils to exclude such backdated applications from their figures.

Advertisement

Last year the government announced £39bn in funding for social and affordable housing over 10 years, with an aim of delivering 300,000 homes, with at least 60 per cent at social rents. The announcement was welcomed by Shelter as a “good start”.

A spokesperson for MHCLG says: “We know waiting lists are often far too long and we’re taking action to give people the stability and security they deserve. We’re building 1.5 million homes and investing a record £39bn in social and affordable housing to help councils get spades in the ground.

“This is alongside our changes to right to buy, which will make sure councils can keep hold of desperately needed homes.” 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Would-be-winners claim Reform stiffed them on prize

Published

on

Nigel Farage and the angry residents he's stiffed Reform

Nigel Farage and the angry residents he's stiffed Reform

Reform attracted controversy recently after it conducted a prize giveaway. This upset people for a couple of reasons: the first was that Nigel Farage’s motley crew are supposed to be a political party, not a daytime TV show. The second was that the two winners had a historic connection to Nigel Farage.

The prize in question should have seen Reform paying the electric bill for everyone in the winners’ street for a year. Now, various residents have come forward to claim Farage is stiffing them:

Stiffed by Reform

Obviously the purpose of all this was to grab headlines and make it look like Reform are the anti-nasty party. Odd, then, that they’d decide to leave out some households. This was always going to generate negative press, and now here we are.

This is what widow Angie Ecclestone told reporters:

I thought to myself I’ll believe it when I see it but I didn’t realise I had been excluded and that my neighbours had all received a letter and instructions.

Nigel Farage said the whole street [would be included] but we haven’t heard anything. I am in shock. I am the first house on St Malo Road. It’s the whole street or not the street. I am mortified.

Advertisement

Additionally:

My husband died in August last year and one of my kids has his GCSEs in three weeks.

I have the biggest house in the street. It’s five bedrooms. I pay £400 per month on energy. All the other houses are semi-detached but this one is fully detached. I am really up against it.

We’re unsure why the party decided to leave out Ecclestone, but it seems like they couldn’t have picked a worse person to screw over from a marketing perspective.

Obviously the human element should come before marketing, but let’s be real; Reform aren’t doing this because they’re caring human beings; they’re doing it because they want to look good in the papers.

Advertisement

It doesn’t end with Ecclestone either:

Advertisement

“Absolutely not a Reform fan”

Fraser Hayes is another of the un-rewarded neighbours. In his own words:

I have no qualms about depriving Reform of the money and giving to a local kids’ charity or maybe even the Labour candidate.

[The stunt] is appalling. It’s obviously a data grab. They’re trying to get loads of people to write in and they ask, ‘Who did you vote for last time. Who will you vote for this time?’

I am absolutely not a Reform fan and I am appalled that anyone is.

Did Farage leave Hayes out because he can’t stand them?

Advertisement

And if so, would it not have been smarter to just give him the juice and avoid the bad press?

The third resident is Matt Johnson, who said:

We thought we would hear something from Reform by email or post but at the moment we haven’t heard anything.

I mean if Reform said at the time it would be the whole street, then we feel like we should be included in that.

Our energy bills keep going up and down but they are around £3,500 a year. Having them paid for would make a huge difference.

Advertisement

What we’re seeing here is what the UK will be like under a Reform government.

Farage’s party will sweep in on a wave of big promises, but nothing will happen, and they’ll ignore anyone asking ‘what gives?

Thinking ahead

Looking at St Malo Road on Google Maps, there seems to be about 18 properties. You have to wonder what would have happened if the winner lived on a street with some hundred or so detached houses. Would Reform really have paid for every one of them?

We imagine it didn’t consider that, because they don’t seem to have considered anything.

Advertisement

For more on Farage’s party’s chaotic local election campaign, check out the following:

Featured image via The Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Autistic Son’s Quirk In Airport Bathroom Riles Up Stranger

Published

on

Autistic Son’s Quirk In Airport Bathroom Riles Up Stranger

As my daughter and I stepped out of our respective stalls in the airport bathroom, I saw my son standing in the corner waiting for us, having come in after he had used the men’s room next door. He has a habit of eloping at airports, so I was relieved to see him.

“Love,” I told him. “Thank you for coming in and waiting for us.” The three of us moved to the sink to wash our hands. That’s when things got weird.

My son has high-functioning autism, what used to be called Asperger’s syndrome, now called autism spectrum disorder, level 1 support. When people look at him, they notice nothing different. When they hear him speak, they are often impressed at his verbal comprehension and articulation (indeed, his IQ is very high in this area). His challenges lay in perseverations (obsessions or ruminations), recognising social cues, and having spatial and environmental awareness.

He received his diagnosis at age 7, in March 2020, days before the COVID shutdowns. Suddenly every resource in our small town was unavailable. We started homeschooling and would continue it long after schools reopened. My son loved our home routine, probably because he got to see the family dog whenever he wanted. He’s always had a special connection to animals (music too).

Advertisement

He’s a seasoned and easy traveler, having taken his first flight at 2 months old, which I’m thankful for. Still, traveling is not without stress. He tends to wander away at airports. Over the years I’ve had several moments of pure fear when I didn’t immediately know where he was. One time, after landing and coming into the airport, he bolted for the bathroom without telling me. Another time he proceeded to try and leave the airport because he didn’t want to wait in the TSA line.

Over the years I’ve accepted that most of the time he lives in another world — his inner dimension. While it’s rich and creative and weird and wonderful, there have been moments where I’ve begged him to live in our world more often, not for my convenience but for his safety. Since, on this day, we were in Los Angeles International Airport, one of the busiest airports in the world, I was on high alert. Because of his relatively young age (11), I didn’t think it was strange that he was in the crowded women’s bathroom with us.

My son also has a fascination with sink and toilet holes. He studies the shape of them, talks about them, wants to see as many of them as he can, both in people’s homes and in public places. It’s always been his way. And, according to him, this particular sink hole in this bathroom at LAX had a unique shape — it was less round and more square than most sink holes.

After retrieving his phone from his pocket, he took a photo of it. That’s when an older woman – one I’d noticed had been watching us – snapped. She was washing her hands in the sink next to where my son was, and I saw her look over at him. She started yelling, “This boy took a picture in the women’s room!” She repeated this loudly for everyone to hear as she dried her hands, as she grabbed her luggage, as she followed us out the door.

Advertisement

I felt a combination of embarrassment and anger at the scene she was making, trying to call attention to my son’s odd but harmless behaviour. She was still repeating it as we all walked out the door: “He took a picture in the women’s room!” Her posture was menacing and meant to be intimidating.

We separated from her and moved to the side of the hallway to regroup. My son and daughter, not fully comprehending what was happening, stood close to me with their suitcases. Even though we were now a few yards away from her, I could still feel her eyes on us, particularly me. I could sense her judgment for allowing such behaviour from my child. I could tell she was waiting for me to berate my son for taking the photo.

What happened next was horrifying. I did exactly what she wanted me to.

Against my gut feeling, which told me my son was innocent, against my understanding of his diagnosis, against my hard-won advocacy of him at school and with medical providers, against my purported assertiveness with strangers and others who may not be conscious of why he behaves the way he does, I scolded him for his actions. I asked him, not in a friendly way, why he chose to take a photo of the sink, even though I knew exactly why. I told him it was inappropriate and that he knew better, even when I knew it wasn’t true, that he didn’t know. I made sure the woman was within earshot. As I went on, my son looked stunned, confused and hurt.

Advertisement

The worst part is that I love his innocence, his youthful quirkiness, his sweet naiveté that sometimes comes with autism. And here I was chipping away at that, all because a stranger assumed the worst of him. I was doing the opposite of what I’ve always done.

The woman’s gaze was gone. She had folded herself into the crowd and disappeared. My son, overwhelmed and teary with emotion, bolted toward our departing gate, which fortunately wasn’t far. I took a breath, took my daughter’s hand and followed my son to the gate. It was there, in our seats waiting for the boarding call, that I apologised. I cried. Never in all of motherhood had I felt so low. I told him I was aghast at my behaviour, that I should have stood up for him, that I knew what he had done was innocent. I asked for forgiveness. I told him to take his time. I am perpetually grateful that I got it.

An hour later in the air, I was still brooding, replaying the scene over and over in my head. I found myself looking for the woman, imagining, relishing in what I’d say to her in a raised voice: that she had no right to yell at us, to shame us, to treat my son as though he was a paedophile. That she had been bullying an autistic boy. See that boy over there? Do you know he has autism? You should be ashamed of yourself.

That last thought gave me pause. Would I really disclose his diagnosis? To what end? Is it her business? Would it have made a difference? Would I be hoping to better explain his behaviour or to make her feel bad? And as my children grow older (my daughter also has autism), I find myself regarding their privacy more, wanting to protect them. Because I constantly wonder if the world will be too much for their sensitive souls. Or perhaps they will be too much for the world.

Advertisement

The diagnosis of “autism” first appeared in 1980 in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the bible for all things psychological, under the category of Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Before then, it was considered to be part of schizophrenia. In 1987, the DSM was revised (as it is every five to seven years), and the criteria for the diagnosis was broadened to include more mild symptoms of autism. That, coupled with improved early screening tools and an increased awareness, have led to a perception of a significant rise in the disorder, though it’s actually that we’ve gotten better at recognising it.

In the latest DSM, it is listed as autism spectrum disorder, typically followed by the level of support needed (1 through 3). My children are both level 1, which include accommodations such as extra time to transition between activities, managing perseverations and inflexibility in routine, and navigating pervasive and narrow interests (such as sink holes).

In the end, I arrived at the conclusion that no, I would choose not to disclose his diagnosis to this angry stranger. She didn’t deserve to know. She didn’t deserve an explanation. In a different setting, where emotions weren’t so charged, I might have a different answer.

With my son’s blessing, I wrote this essay to give voice to the fine line that parents of children with autism walk, the line between advocating for our kids and guarding their privacy, the line between explaining and keeping quiet, the line between supporting a need and excusing behaviour. It’s within these nuances where we live day by day, sometimes hour by hour. Sometimes I don’t get the answer right, but all answers come from a place of care and love.

Advertisement

For people who may not have or even know children like mine, I wrote this to encourage more empathy in the world. These days it is too easy to rush to conclusions about a child’s behaviour, judge another’s parenting and shame what is not acceptable to us. I encourage everyone to lean into curiosity and compassion as much as possible, know that we are doing the best job we can, and that our children are amazing people.

As my daughter and I stepped out of our respective stalls in the airport bathroom, I saw my son standing in the corner waiting for us, and I was so proud of him. Going forward, I refuse to feel anything else about him — and I’ll make sure he and everyone else know it.

Lorna Rose is a Pacific Northwest writer and speaker. Her writing has been recognised by Pacific Northwest Writers Association and the Oregon Poetry Association, and has appeared in About Place Journal, Jellyfish Review, Painted Bride Quarterly, Writers Resist, and elsewhere. Previously she has written about raising children with autism for Scary Mommy and Motherwell. Currently an MFA candidate at Augsburg University, Lorna is at work on a memoir about going from L.A. party girl to trail worker in rural Alaska. When not wrangling her two children, she fantasises about being interviewed on NPR’s “Fresh Air.” You can find more about her at www.lornarose.com.

This piece was previously published on HuffPost and is being shared again as part of HuffPost Personal’s “Best Of” series.

Advertisement

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Lyrid Meteor Shower 2026: Where, How, And When To See It

Published

on

Lyrid Meteor Shower 2026: Where, How, And When To See It

This April is a good month for stargazers. There’s the “planet parade” of Saturn, Mars, Mercury, and Neptune, ending on the 23rd.

And the Lyrid meteor shower, which started on 16 April and will end on the 25th, is set to show us its most dazzling display this week too.

What is the Lyrid meteor shower?

First recorded in 678 BE, the phenomenon includes debris which once followed in the wake of comet C/1861 G1 Thatcher.

Advertisement

They look from the Earth’s perspective like they’re shooting from the constellation Lyra, right beside the star Vega; hence the name.

It’s not exactly that they’re “shooting” towards from across space, though. We’re passing through the patch of space rubble in our journey around the sun, and we draw in some of the material as we do so.

That means the path of the Earth’s orbit determines the direction the meteors seem to come from.

When they enter our atmosphere, the objects move so fast that they compress the air and heat it, raising their surfaces to 1600°C.

Advertisement

That leaves them with a bright surface as they burn, which looks like a streak to us.

It’s rare for objects in a meteor shower to make it to the Earth’s ground, as most are too small and burn out too quickly. If they do reach us, though, they become “meteorites”.

When can I see the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower in the UK?

It will end on April 25, but the most dazzling displays are expected on Wednesday, 22 April, when the shower peaks.

Advertisement

To get the most out of the meteor shower, look at the dark for 20-30 minutes to help your eyes adjust to the light levels (don’t look at your phone during this period!).

The best shows may come after midnight.

Where can I watch the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower in the UK?

While April’s planet parade will be a lot harder to see in the northern hemisphere than it is in the south, the opposite is true of the Lyrid meteor shower.

Advertisement

If you have access to unobstructed, clear, dark skies, your odds of seeing the event are higher. Beaches, the tops of hills, and fields are all good spots.

How should I watch the 2026 Lyrid meteor shower?

It should be visible to the naked eye.

The longer you look, Space.com noted, the likelier you are to spot something out of this world.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nick Robinson Denounces Minister Over Mandelson Scandal

Published

on

Nick Robinson Denounces Minister Over Mandelson Scandal

Nick Robinson monstered a cabinet minister over the Peter Mandelson scandal in an extraordinary live radio clash.

The veteran Today programme presenter told Scottish secretary Douglas Alexander it was “frankly preposterous” to claim Keir Starmer knew nothing about the shamed former peer’s business and personal links before making his the UK’s ambassador to Washington.

Mandelson was sacked after just six months in the role after the full extent of his friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was revealed.

It emerged last week that he was also failed security vetting, allegedly over his lobbying company’s links to China, but was still cleared to take up the job.

Advertisement

The prime minister is facing calls to resign over the scandal and will face MPs in the House of Commons on Monday afternoon to explain himself.

On the Today programme, Alexander insisted the PM had done nothing wrong and had in fact been let down by civil servants.

But Robinson told him: “What more did you need to know? We know that Peter Mandelson had business links with China, we know that he had business links with Russia, we know that he had personal links with Jeffrey Epstein.

“And not only do we know it, the prime minister knew it, because we know as a matter of record that Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser, said ‘this appointment process is weirdly rushed’.

Advertisement

“So why did the prime minister appoint someone without waiting for the vetting?”

Alexander insisted “information was withheld from the prime minister and from other ministers” during the vetting process.

Robinson told him: “To come on the radio and claim that there was any surprise that Peter Mandelson had any links to Jeffrey Epstein, links to China, links to Russia … it is frankly preposterous.”

But the minister said: “The deep vetting process is undertaken specifically to look at information that was not in the public domain.

Advertisement

“If this process really matters, then I think your listeners will reasonably think why wasn’t the outcome of that deep vetting shared with ministers making their decisions?”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Bayern Munich continue their dominance of the Bundesliga, claiming their 35th title

Published

on

Bayern Munich

Bayern Munich

Bayern Munich have clinched the German football league title for the 35th time in their history, with four matches remaining in the season, following a 4-2 home victory over Stuttgart on Sunday 19 April at the Allianz Arena in Matchday 30, thus rounding off a perfect week both domestically and in Europe.

Bayern Munich: winners again

The Bavarian side, who are still in contention for the domestic treble of the league, cup and Champions League, had previously reached the semi-finals of the continental competition after knocking out Real Madrid, thus continuing their strong season on all fronts, whilst also edging closer to the domestic cup final, where they will face Bayer Leverkusen.

With this triumph, Bayern continues its dominance of German football, as this title marks their 13th in the last 14 Bundesliga seasons, with Bayer Leverkusen having broken this run only in the 2023–2024 season.

The team have taken their tally to 79 points at the top of the table, 15 points clear of second-placed Borussia Dortmund, who stumbled to a 2-1 defeat against Hoffenheim in the same round.

Advertisement

Bayern now face a series of crucial fixtures, taking on Bayer Leverkusen in the Cup semi-final next Wednesday, then Mainz in the league on Saturday, before travelling to France to face Paris Saint-Germain in the first leg of the Champions League semi-final on 28 April, with the return leg scheduled for 6 May.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

9 Signs Your Relationship Isn’t Worth Fighting For

Published

on

Sometimes love really isn't enough. And not every relationship is worth saving.

No one said relationships were easy ― even the strongest couples will inevitably hit a few bumps in the road. But your partner shouldn’t be a constant source of stress, hurt feelings or resentment.

So how do you know if your relationship has hit the point of no return? Automatic dealbreakers like abusive behaviour aside, many issues can be worked through with time, commitment and help from a therapist.

But if you’ve tried and tried and things still don’t improve, or if your partner is simply unwilling to do the work, it could be time to move on.

Sometimes love really isn't enough. And not every relationship is worth saving.

stock-eye via Getty Images

Sometimes love really isn’t enough. And not every relationship is worth saving.

We asked experts to share the signs that a relationship may no longer be worth fighting for. (Note that the advice below is meant to serve as general suggestions. The circumstances of each relationship are different; there’s no one-size-fits-all approach.)

Advertisement

1. You’re being abused — physically or emotionally.

“If your spouse pushes, shoves, grabs or hits you for any reason, it’s not worth trying to change them. If this is happening on any level, get out NOW. Are they gaslighting you or being emotionally abusive? If your partner tells you that you are imagining any type of abusive behavior or that you are just ‘too sensitive,’ get out. You deserve to be treated with respect. It’s not worth fighting about.” ― Tammy Nelson, a sex therapist in New Haven, Connecticut, and author of The New Monogamy: Redefining Your Relationship After Infidelity

2. You feel like you’re the only one fighting for the relationship.

“I actually don’t think it’s a good idea to be in a relationship if you feel like you are always fighting to remain in it. However, sometimes it does make sense to try very hard for a period of time to get through a rough patch and move on. If you’re always the one putting in effort and your partner shows minimal effort, that is a sign that it’s not worth fighting for. If you are embarrassed to tell people about the amount of effort you have to put into the relationship to keep it going, that is a sign that you may have exceeded an appropriate amount of effort.” ― Marie Land, a psychologist in Washington, D.C.

Advertisement

3. Your partner refuses to seek help for personal issues or problems within the relationship.

“It takes much caring and courage to be vulnerable enough to reach out for help. We all need it sometimes. If you’re consistently feeling miserable in the relationship and your partner is unwilling to accept help, whether it’s couples counseling or addressing an addiction that is damaging the relationship, it may be time to consider leaving.” ― John Amodeo, marriage and family therapist in San Francisco and author of Dancing with Fire: A Mindful Way to Loving Relationships

4. You can’t stand kissing your partner.

“Yes, this feeling can come and go. Sometimes you like to kiss, other times you don’t even want your partner’s face anywhere near yours. But if your mouth is telling you that you really cannot stand to kiss your partner anymore and that feeling doesn’t change over time, it might be over.” ― Nelson

Advertisement

5. Your close friends have serious doubts about the relationship.

“Who is the person that sees your relationship most clearly? The research shows that your friends actually have more insight into the state of the relationship than you do, particularly female best friends. If they’re starting to express concerns, it can reveal underlying issues that you may not be aware of yourself.” ― Gary Lewandowski, professor of psychology at Monmouth University in New Jersey and co-creator of ScienceOfRelationships.com

6. Your partner isn’t reliable.

“I’ve been married 30 years, and here is why I have fought for my marriage during challenging times: My husband is trustworthy and reliable. A reason to leave is when the trust is irrevocably broken — by lies about money spent, adultery or repeated emotional and physical abuse. You deserve someone you can unfailingly count on. To me, reliability is the sexiest quality you can hope for — a quality that is essential in an intimate partnership, as we live in a shaky and inconsistent world.” ― Iris Krasnow, author of Surrendering to Marriage and The Secret Lives of Wives

Advertisement

7. You or your partner has had multiple affairs.

“Are you using infidelity as a ‘can opener’? Be fair. End your relationship now. Don’t make your partner responsible for your ambivalence.” ― Nelson

8. You’ve stopped making progress in other areas of your life because of the relationship.

“If your relationship has taken up so much emotional energy and attention that it has prevented you from moving forward with other goals such as a career, family and friendships, that’s a sign that your relationship may not be worth fighting for. Some sacrifice is fine but the cost should be minimal and not impact your progress in other areas for an extended period of time.” ― Land

Advertisement

9. Your partner routinely dismisses your concerns.

“It’s not an encouraging sign if your partner is unwilling or unable to hear your feelings, your hurt and pain and take it to heart. If your feelings and needs (for respect, kindness, communication) are coldly and consistently dismissed, if stonewalling and defensiveness are creating an impenetrable barrier, it may leave you feeling lonely, angry, or depressed, and maybe hopeless about the relationship.”Amodeo

The original version of this story was published on HuffPost at an earlier date.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Olivia Colman’s Heartstopper Character Recast With Anna Maxwell Martin Taking Over

Published

on

Joe Locke and Kit Connor share a kiss as Charlie and Nick in Heartstopper

Olivia Colman’s character in Heartstopper will be played by a different actor in the show’s upcoming film.

The Oscar winner received widespread praise for her portrayal of Nick’s mum, Sarah Nelson, in the first two seasons of the Netflix teen drama.

However, in its third iteration, Olivia was unable to appear, with Hayley Atwell instead appearing as Nick’s aunt, who served a maternal role in his life for these episodes.

Over the weekend, it was confirmed that in the forthcoming movie Heartstopper Forever, the character of Sarah has been completely recast due to Olivia’s unavailability.

Advertisement

In her absence, the role will now be played by Line Of Duty and Motherland star Anna Maxwell Martin.

Heartstopper creator Alice Oseman told Netflix’s Tudum: “When beginning to work on the Heartstopper Forever screenplay, I knew how important it was that Sarah, Nick’s mum, appeared in the story.

“Since season one, we have seen how close Nick is with his mum; she’s one of the few people he can turn to in moments of crisis. While in season three, we were able to tweak the story to avoid any appearance of Sarah, it felt nonsensical for her to be absent from this final chapter, given some of the emotional struggles Nick faces.”

They continued: “Sadly, Olivia Colman was not able to join us for the film, so we made the very difficult decision to recast the role, rather than exclude the character. We are deeply grateful for Olivia’s beautiful performance as Sarah in seasons one and two of Heartstopper, through such iconic moments as Nick coming out as bisexual, and we know that her performance will live on in the hearts of every Heartstopper fan.

Advertisement

“We are overjoyed to welcome the incredible Anna Maxwell Martin into the role of Sarah for Heartstopper Forever. Anna perfectly embodies Sarah’s gentle, down-to-earth energy, and it was magical to witness her scenes with Kit Connor during the film shoot. I can’t wait for Heartstopper fans to experience her interpretation of Sarah Nelson.”

Joe Locke and Kit Connor share a kiss as Charlie and Nick in Heartstopper
Joe Locke and Kit Connor share a kiss as Charlie and Nick in Heartstopper

Heartstopper Forever will premiere on Netflix later this year, and serve as the final outing for Nick and Charlie, played by Kit Connor and Joe Locke.

As well as the usual returning cast members, including Yasmin Finney and Will Gao, it’s been confirmed that Bafta winner Derek Jacobi will also be playing a new character in the film.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025