A great compact tablet for students that doesn’t skimp on performance and includes a brilliant stylus in the box? The Lenovo Yoga Tab has a lot to like.
Great, compact size
Good performance for the price
Stylus included
Just three years of updates
Bloatware
Key Features
Advertisement
Review Price:
£479
Stylus included:
Advertisement
Bundled with the Lenovo Tab Pen Pro
Quad-speaker setup:
Advertisement
Two tweeters and two woofers
3.2K resolution:
Advertisement
11.1-inch IPS LCD
Introduction
Tempted by the iPad Air’s set of features, but would rather spend a little less at the checkout? The Lenovo Yoga Tab might be the alternative you’ve been waiting for.
I have to hand it to Lenovo, there aren’t too many companies out there that offer quite the same degree of variety in the world of tablets compared to the likes of Apple and Samsung, but the brand has absolutely no shortage of options to the point where practically every type of budget is catered for.
Advertisement
Sitting below the premium-level Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, the standard Lenovo Yoga Tab is still a fairly feature-packed tablet, but thanks to a starting price of £479/$549.99, it’s more affordable than crucial options like the iPad Air M4 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE.
Advertisement
Of course, even with a head start on price, the question remains as to whether or not Lenovo can do enough with the Yoga Tab to lure potential adopters.
Despite having reviewed countless tablets from other brands, this is the first Lenovo tablet I’ve ever had the pleasure of testing, and I’ll gladly admit that I should have been paying more attention to the company’s output sooner.
Advertisement
Design
Very compact build
Only 6.2mm thick
Just two colourways available
Being unfamiliar with Lenovo’s design language when it comes to the company’s tablets, I wasn’t too sure what to expect, but I found myself pleasantly surprised from the very first moment that I held the Yoga Tab. This is a slick tablet that brilliantly tows the line of having a decently sized display (11.1 inches) but without ever feeling cumbersome, making it a solid option for some entertainment on the go.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
At just 6.2mm thick and with a starting weight of only 458g, the Lenovo Yoga Tab, from a pure design perspective, is exactly what I want from a tablet most of the time. Having recently used the excellent OnePlus Pad Go 2, as much as I loved its larger frame for a bit of productivity when working from home, it’s a little too large to be my go-to tablet if I’m travelling and would rather have something compact that can more easily fit into my carry-on luggage, which is exactly what the Yoga Tab can do.
Even though I’ve been using the device without a case for the duration of this review, because the tablet itself is so slim, I don’t think that bringing a case into the mix will diminish its portability in any meaningful way.
However, one feature that I wish the Yoga Tab had pinched from more affordable Lenovo Idea Tabs is a helpful kickstand for easy viewing. I’ve had to constantly prop the Yoga Tab against several objects, but because the backing doesn’t provide a tangible grip, this has often led to me saving the tablet from sliding away at the last second.
There are two colourways available, Seashell and Luna Grey, the former of which I’ve had in for testing. Both models have a semi-professional look about them, so if they are brought into a meeting they won’t look out of place, but I do wish that they had a bit more of a personality to them. Even the iPad Air M4, despite being a more premium tablet, comes with a hint of colour.
Advertisement
For the sake of consistency, however, I’d recommend picking up the Luna Grey option as it’s colour matched with the included Lenovo Tab Pen Pro, creating a better look overall.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Screen
11.1-inch IPS LCD panel
3.2K resolution
144Hz refresh rate
As I’ve said before, an 11.1-inch panel is the sweet spot as it’s big enough to provide a far more immersive viewing experience than my smartphone, but it’s not too large as to feel cumbersome in the hand, which can be an issue with larger tablets like the 13-inch iPads and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra.
In terms of the display itself, it packs a 3.2K resolution which helps to keep everything looking crisp, whether that’s on the homescreen or when scrolling through the likes of Netflix and Disney Plus for your next watch. It’s also IPS LCD, so no OLED here, although that isn’t too surprising, as you typically have to spend a bit more in order to enjoy self-lighting pixels on a tablet.
Still, the colours look great, and when diving into my go-to stream of Avengers: Infinity War, I did find myself getting drawn into the action.
The refresh rate can also top out at 144Hz, which is great news for gamers. It’s shown off in its best light when running through a couple of matches in titles like Call of Duty Mobile, but even when giving Balatro a spin (although the game is far from the most taxing one out there), all of the animations and card twists look buttery smooth on this display.
Advertisement
One thing I would have liked to see is a slightly higher brightness than the current peak of 800 nits. It certainly gets the job done in most scenarios, but I did spot a bit of dimming around the edges of the display when viewing webpages with a white background. If you’re coming up from a much older tablet then this probably won’t be noticeable, but I did find the OnePlus Pad Go 2 to be a better performer in the brightness department.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The Yoga Tab’s display is nice and responsive though, which was great to see when I was rearranging apps to have everything set up in just the right multitasking configuration. This also applies to instances of using the Pen Pro, with minimal delay present to make you feel connected with your writing.
Cameras
13MP main camera
The 2MP macro camera feels like an odd addition
13MP front-facing camera
As much as I love tablet computers, their cameras are barely an afterthought in how I use them, and, as ever, I would not recommend choosing a tablet based on the sensors it includes. Still, if you do need to rely on cameras occasionally for scanning a document or jumping into a Zoom call, then you won’t be disappointed with what the Lenovo Yoga Tab has to offer.
On the back, there’s a 13MP wide-angle camera that can take okay pictures if you need a reference point for something, but start zooming into the shots, and you’ll notice that the detail falls apart pretty quickly. As I mentioned before, this camera is far better suited for scanning documents when needed, and I was impressed to see that even on my dimly lit desk, the camera was able to take a decent scan of a document, which could then be tweaked after the fact to distinguish the text a bit better.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
What I can’t quite wrap my head around is the inclusion of a secondary 2MP macro camera on the rear. This is exactly the type of useless feature that the Lenovo Yoga Tab could have done without, as it would have been much nicer to see Lenovo’s efforts focused elsewhere, or to have the price be just a tad more affordable.
Advertisement
At the very least, the front-facing 13MP ultra-wide camera does a great job of capturing everything around you, so if you and several other people near you want to hop onto a video call, there’s a good chance that you’ll all appear on the screen without any need for jostling.
Performance
Solid power from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Gaming works like a charm
Tremendous speakers
Powering the Lenovo Yoga Tab is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset which, despite being a few years old now, is still capable of fairly impressive performance. After all, this is the same chipset that used to be reserved for flagship phones, including the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
I did encounter a slight slowdown during the early phase of using the tablet, whilst everything was installing in the background, with the whole thing freezing on me for a few seconds before responding, but beyond that initial period, I have very much enjoyed my time with the Lenovo Yoga Tab.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Because of the relatively compact size of the device, I’ve enjoyed catching up on the latest headlines, scrolling through the BBC News website with ease, as well as constantly jumping back and forth between the likes of Amazon, Currys and John Lewis on the hunt for any tech or gaming deals I can get my hands on.
When I fancied a bit of interactive entertainment, I was able to connect an Xbox controller over Bluetooth and absolutely decimate my way through a round of Call of Duty: Mobile (anyone using touchscreen controls didn’t stand a chance). Everything ran smoothly, and I didn’t pick up on any instances of lag or screen tearing, something which was partially helped by the 144Hz refresh rate.
Advertisement
Multitasking is also handled incredibly well on the Lenovo Yoga Tab, with my typical use case of having Google Docs open next to the Chrome browser proving to be no issue whatsoever. When pushing it a bit further, I was even more impressed in having BBC News open on one side, Balatro playing on another, and a windowed Disney Plus stream in the corner, all without the tablet buckling. If you’re a student who needs a bit of distraction as you revise, this set-up is perfect.
Test Data
Lenovo Yoga Tab
OnePlus Pad Go 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus
Geekbench 6 single core
2220
1003
1230
Geekbench 6 multi core
5758
3082
3545
Geekbench 6 GPU
13300
2602
–
3D Mark – Wild Life
4445
874
1348
3D Mark – Wild Life Stress Test
3893 %
98.8 %
–
The only area where I saw limitations in the chipset was when playing more demanding 3D titles. To the Yoga Tab’s credit, it handled the exploration sections of Honkai Star Rail rather well, but it was in the game’s battles that I would spot the occasional frame jump. Still, that’s not bad for a tablet of this price, and unless you’re a serious gamer, I don’t think you’re going to hit the performance ceiling of this tablet very often (if at all).
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Saving the best for last, what really gave me pause about this tablet is its speakers. I didn’t anticipate anything special from a tablet this compact, but the quad-firing set-up provides one of the best soundscapes I’ve ever come across in a tablet. Getting to run through my usual test streams has been an absolute joy, and there’s a serious amount of weight provided. If you’re on the road and the Lenovo Yoga Tab is your only source of entertainment, then I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.
Software
Android with the Lenovo ZUI overlay
An unfortunate amount of bloatware
Just three major software updates
As far as the user experience goes, the Yoga Tab uses Lenovo ZUI, and although this was my first experience with this specific Android overlay, I will say that I grew to like it over the course of the testing period. The UI isn’t quite as stylish as OnePlus’ Oxygen OS, but everything is clearly labelled which I appreciated.
For example, you can easily dive into a bit of multitasking by tapping on the three dots that sit at the top of an app, wherein you can have apps sit side by side or have several windowed apps around the screen. Unfortunately you can’t do 90/10 multitasking wherein a second app sits largely out of the way on the side of the display, but can be called upon quickly with a single tap, so it’s not quite as robust an experience as what you’ll find with Open Canvas on OnePlus tablets.
Advertisement
Still, Lenovo’s approach to simplicity also carries over to the quick-access controls for the Pen Pro, wherein you can jot down notes, use Google’s Circle to Search or scribble on a screenshot of whatever’s on the display. I’m not typically a fan of using stylus pens on tablets either, but with the way the software is laid out and the Pen’s very satisfying haptic feedback, I found myself picking it up fairly often.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Instead of having Google News pop up when swiping right from the homescreen, you’re greeted with an entertainment hub that’s mostly centred around Google services. By default, the first thing you see is a Google TV dashboard which collates all of your key streaming services, but you can also access your library of Google Play Store games and any purchased Google Play Books.
Personally, I could do without most of those options, but having quick access to Google TV is great, especially as it cuts down on needing to jump from one streaming app to another in search of what you want to watch.
What I didn’t appreciate seeing was a decent amount of bloatware preinstalled on the device. Before I ever started downloading my own apps, the likes of Adobe Express, CapCut and Perplexity were already present, alongside (strangely enough) two separate drawing/painting apps. It’s something I fully expect to see at the budget end of the market, but at £479 the Yoga Tab is much closer to the mid-range sector.
Advertisement
Even with the bloatware at play, what really stands out as a major knock against the Yoga Tab is that it only carries a promise of three OS updates from the time of launch. Usability is extended slightly by four years of security updates, but it’s not great when you consider that Apple and Samsung offer far in excess of that, so if you don’t want to upgrade your tablet in just a few years, then I recommend looking elsewhere.
Battery life
8660mAh cell
45W charging
Charges to full in one hour and 28 minutes
If you do plan on using the Lenovo Yoga Tab either as a productivity device or for getting through your studies, you won’t have much to worry about in terms of battery life. There’s a sizeable 8860mAh silicon carbon cell crammed into this tablet, impressive given its slim build, but it’s meant that I haven’t ever really had to worry about topping it up as I’ve gone about my day.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
You can get a larger 10200mAh battery by opting for the more expensive Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, but unless you really plan on spending hours editing high-quality videos in LumaFusion or CapCut, I don’t think you’ll need the extra grunt.
Charging is also set at 45W, which is fair for a tablet of this price. It’s the same charging speed as the more expensive Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, although if battery is your main concern, then you can get 66W charging (and a bigger cell) on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro.
When using a 65W charger, which effectively allows the Yoga Tab to reach its 45W capacity, it took only 1 hour and 28 minutes to reach a full charge, which isn’t bad. Getting to the 50% mark only took 43 minutes, so if you’re in a rush, then you can get back enough juice to get you through a few lectures.
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
You need a compact tablet for university
With good speeds, a stylus included and a slim build that’s easy to carry around, the Lenovo Yoga Tab is a great option for students.
Advertisement
You want a tablet for the long haul
With just three years of software updates provided by Lenovo, the Yoga Tab doesn’t offer the same type of futureproofing as you’ll find with Samsung devices.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
As someone who spent most of their undergraduate and postgraduate years preferring to use a tablet rather than a laptop, the Lenovo Yoga Tab is exactly the type of device I would have loved to have during my studies. This isn’t to say that adults won’t enjoy using this tablet, only that I think the Yoga Tab excels best as an all-in-one device for students.
Advertisement
The Snapdragon chipset makes multitasking very easy, and with a stylus included, you can take down handwritten notes in a pinch – perfect for when you’re brainstorming with a study group. When you’re ready to call it a day, it’s the combination of quick access to Google TV and the surprisingly powerful built-in speakers that allow the Yoga Tab to work just as well as an entertainment device.
Above all though, it’s the compact nature of this tablet that makes it feel very inviting to use. The lightweight stature makes it simple enough to carry one-handed, and you’ll barely notice its presence when flung in a backpack.
I do wish that the tablet came with a longer period of software support, and the presence of bloatware does make the experience feel a little less premium than the competition. The iPad Air M4 and the Samsung Galaxy S10 FE Plus remedy both of these issues, but they do cost a bit more than Lenovo’s tablet. Alternatively, if you want a great productivity tablet for less than the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is also worth a look.
If you still haven’t made up your mind then check out our guide to the best tablets.
Advertisement
How We Test
We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.
Used as a main tablet for over a week Tested and benchmarked using respected industry tests and real-world data
FAQs
Does the Lenovo Yoga Tab come with a stylus and keyboard?
There is a stylus included by default with the Lenovo Yoga Tab, but you’ll have to pay more for a bundle that also includes a keyboard case.
Cyberdecks are typically reminiscent of weird computers in futuristic sci-fi films, moreso than the computers of today. The cool thing about cyberdecks, though, is you get to build them however you like. [WillTechBuilds] has put together a deck of his own that diverges from cyberdeck norms and ends up closer to something you might have bought off the shelf at Best Buy.
For a start, the build eschews the typical Raspberry Pi or other single-board computer that normally lives at the heart of a cyberdeck. In its place is a motherboard harvested from a GMKTec NucBox G5. It runs the Intel N97 CPU. It’s an x86 processor that’s roughly equivalent in power to an i5 from 10 years ago, but it only sips 12 watts. The compact motherboard is installed in a compact 3D-printed case along with a porbable USB-C battery pack, a small widescreen LCD, and a Lenovo ThinkPad trackpoint keyboard. This latter design choice, along with the x86 chip, is what gives this build so much of a laptop feel. There’s no weird Linux desktop, green-glowing terminal, or chunky mechanical keyboard here, let alone any GPIO pins. Definitely an oddball entry to the cyberdeck world, but valid nonetheless.
We’ve featured cyberdecks built out of everything from CRT TVs to event badges. As always, we’d love to see your latest innovative creation on the tipsline. Video after the break.
Over the years, smartphone brands have steadily refined their craft. From design to performance, devices in 2026 feel sharper, smarter, and far more polished than before. But a recent look at the Sony Xperia 1 VIII suggests Sony might be holding on a little too tightly to the past, and not entirely in a good way. Here’s why I feel that way.
This doesn’t look like the Sony we remember
I remember when Sony really stood out. There was a certain confidence to its design language, something that felt distinct. Looking at the Xperia 1 VIII now, though, it feels like that clarity has faded a bit. The back panel, at least in this render, is where things really fall apart for me. The design looks absolutely confusing. Sony’s signature vertically aligned camera setup has always been part of its identity, and moving away from that strips away a sense of familiarity that long-time users associated with the brand. Without that, the design feels oddly generic, almost like it could belong to any other phone.
As for the camera island, it comes across as bulky and somewhat dated, reminding me of the OnePlus 10 Pro from 2022, a design language even OnePlus has since moved on from. That’s what makes this feel particularly off. It feels like revisiting an idea the rest of the industry has already left behind.
Weibo
What stands out even more is how out of sync this feels with where smartphone design is headed today. Most brands are leaning into cleaner, more minimal aesthetics that feel refined and modern. Loud, heavy camera islands are usually reserved for niche or limited-edition designs now, not mainstream flagships.
All of this makes it seem like Sony isn’t quite setting its own direction, but is instead borrowing from trends that have already run their course. And for a brand that once led with such a strong design identity, that shift feels a little disappointing.
Advertisement
A shift without a sense of direction
To be honest, I’ve always held Sony to a slightly higher standard. It was one of those brands you expected to take a clear, confident stance on design and experience. That’s why this feels a bit disappointing now. It’s not just about one device, but the sense that the brand has lost some of its direction along the way.
Weibo
At a glance, the Xperia 1 VIII certainly tries to set itself apart, but that distinction feels a bit hollow. It comes across more like a shift without a clear purpose. That’s where it starts to lose ground. In the current flagship landscape, looking different isn’t enough on its own. A design needs to carry intent, show progression, and align with the direction the industry is moving in. This one doesn’t quite deliver on that front. Standing out is simple; moving the needle is what really counts.
Ben McKenzie had a question: “When did WIRED die?” Specifically, the actor-director wanted to know when did WIRED “‘DIE,’ all caps.”
McKenzie wasn’t asking for himself; he was engaging in the time-honored celebrity tradition of reading mean tweets. Although, in this case, the object wasn’t himself so much as the publication hosting the event. McKenzie, who famously played Ryan on The O.C. before becoming a leading voice of crypto skepticism, was sharing the stage with WIRED senior correspondent Andy Greenberg for the first of what will hopefully be a series of smaller events that we are calling WIRED@Night.
McKenzie, coauthor of Easy Money: Cryptocurrency, Casino Capitalism, and the Golden Age of Fraud, has a new independent documentary in theaters called Everyone Is Lying to You for Money. Greenberg, who often writes about crypto scams, talked to him about scenes from the book and movie, in which McKenzie traveled to places like crypto hub El Salvador to understand why the technology still has so much appeal despite its less-than-stellar reputation.
Advertisement
One of McKenzie’s explanations? Male loneliness. “It’s the longing for community, actual community,” McKenzie said, noting that crypto exists online as a kind of extreme gambling, something that really exploded into the mainstream during the Covid-19 pandemic. Here’s to more IRL antidotes to that kind of digital isolation.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Philips Baristina Milk Frother: Two-minute review
The Philips Baristina milk frother is designed to be partnered with the company’s Baristina bean-to-cup espresso machine, and it works an absolute treat. As it’s available as an optional extra for the Baristina machine, I’ve been using it for a couple of weeks alongside my Philips LatteGo 4400 Series espresso machine, and have found it to deliver much more pleasing results compared to my machine where milk foam is concerned.
It has three modes: hot milk foam, hot milk and cold milk foam. It’s incredibly easy to control, with just a single button that you press for no more than one second for hot milk foam, or you can hold it for three seconds to activate the cold milk foam mode. If you want hot milk, you need to remove the coil from the whisk before starting up the machine. Once the button is pressed, the Philips Baristina Milk Frother will spring into action to deliver you a foamy result. There’s no audible beep to let you know it’s finished, but the light on the button will go out.
Advertisement
In use, I found the Philips Baristina Milk Frother to be extremely quiet, measuring around 40dB using the decibelX app on my iPhone, and standing right next to it while it was working. It’s much quieter than using a steam wand on a coffee machine, or the automatic LatteGo system on my Philips machine.
The good thing about the Philips Baristina Milk Frother is that it’s been designed to work with any type of milk, including non-dairy varieties. This can’t be said of all milk frothers, including the Smeg Mini Milk Frother, which is intended to be used only with chilled full-fat dairy milk, and is a feature I find particularly appealing, being an oat milk drinker.
In tests, hot milk foam was very thick, making it well-suited for topping a cappuccino or even an espresso macchiato. Realistically though — and if you’re particularly specific about milk in your coffee — it’s just too thick to make a caffe latte or flat white. For me, personally, whose regular order is an oat milk flat white, I didn’t mind the thickness of the foam, especially as some other milk-foaming systems I’ve used aren’t as effective.
Advertisement
The exact results you achieve will depend on the specific milk you put in. I tried a couple of different oat milk brands and achieved similar results each time — this being a high level of foam, but without much gloss.
With that being said, if you want to be able to adjust the foam texture when frothing milk using a device such as this, the Dreo Baristamaker or Smeg Multi Milk Frother give you the option. It’s a similar story with cold milk foam too, with the Philips Baristina Milk Frother returning a thick, stable foam that is ideal for iced cappuccinos.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
The carafe itself has a non-stick coating that helps your milk pour out easily, and it makes washing up as easy as possible. All it took during my use was a rinse under the tap to remove any leftovers. The whisk is removable to help ensure nothing is caught in it, and this, along with the lid, are both dishwasher safe.
Advertisement
While I was consistently pleased with results, given the fact you can’t specify the level of foam you’d prefer, and you can find more affordable options that do have such function, I have to dock some points from the Philips Baristina Milk Frother.
The Philips Baristina Milk Frother has a list price of $99.99 in the US and AU$149 in Australia. In the UK, it’s currently only available when bundled with the matching Baristina bean-to-cup coffee machine.
Its list price places the Philips milk frother in mid-range territory. The Nespresso Aeroccino 3, which has previously been the milk frother I’ve used at home and which offers the same limited range of features, retails for $99 / £79 / AU$109, making it cheaper only in Australia.
Advertisement
If you want a milk frother that offers more features, Smeg Multi Milk Frother, which has six functions and is also suitable for making drinks like hot chocolate, costs $249.95 / £179.95 / AU$299 and is available globally.
The Philips Baristina Milk Frother has been designed to perfectly match its recently released Baristina bean-to-cup espresso machine. My colleague, Cat, has already reviewed that machine, where she awarded it a full five stars, claiming it to be the best budget espresso machine currently available.
One of the only negatives she could find was that there was no built-in steam wand for frothing milk, making this standalone milk frother a necessity for milk-based coffee drinkers. It comes in the same two color choices of white or black, and adopts the same ribbed aesthetic as the main body of the matching machine.
It comprises a cylindrical carafe, a translucent plastic lid, a removable whisk that’s held in place magnetically and a base that powers the frother. The carafe has a non-stick lining, with raised markings indicating the maximum fill level. There’s no minimum fill level marking, and Philips doesn’t list one on its website — it just mentions a capacity of 4 fl oz / 120ml — but I rarely filled up to the maximum fill line, and was still able to return a large amount of milk foam.
To activate the milk frother, you just need to press the button once to activate hot milk foam, or hold it for roughly three seconds for cold milk foam. You’ll know you’ve activated cold milk foam mode correctly because the ring light around the power button will turn blue. If you just want hot milk with no foam, you can unclip the coil from the whisk handle.
There’s no dedicated pouring spout on the Baristina Milk Frother, you’re free to pour out wherever you want. However, do note that the lack of spout, combined with the sheer thickness of milk foam produced does mean you can forget about creating latte art.
Advertisement
Image 1 of 5
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
I found the Philips Baristina to be relatively quick to finish foaming milk, taking around 90 seconds with oat milk filled to the maximum fill line. The Nespresso Aeroccino 3 that I’ve previously used takes closer to two minutes to heat at full capacity, and the level of foam isn’t always as consistent.
While I primarily used oat milk during my testing, I did also use full-fat dairy milk and, as expected, the results were similarly impressive. Full-fat dairy milk is higher in protein, which is essential when frothing milk to achieve the desired results. Non-dairy milks don’t always have similar levels, so for the Baristina Milk Frother to deliver the level of foam it did with oat milk, is mightily impressive.
I was also impressed by the machine’s ability to consistently heat milk up to around 140ºF / 60ºC, which is ideal for most milk varieties.
Cleaning up is an absolute walk in the park, as the non-stick lining means you only need to rinse the milk frother under the tap to remove any leftovers.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: Should you buy it?
Buy it if…
Don’t buy it if…
Advertisement
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: Also consider
Philips Baristina Milk Frother review: How I tested
(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)
I tested each of the Philips Baristina Milk Frother’s modes using chilled oat milk and fresh full-fat milk, in accordance with Philips’ instructions.
As part of my testing, I used an oat milk that I’ve previously had trouble generating froth with when using a Nespresso milk frother. The Philips machine fared much better.
I cleaned the non-stick carafe under a tap and used a cloth to wipe away any stains, as per the instructions in the user manual.
Apple announced a huge leadership shake-up earlier today. Tim Cook will step down as CEO of the company he has headed for nearly 15 years on September 1st. That post will be filled by John Ternus, who has been with Apple for 25 years, essentially crafting out the modern product line itself. Cook is leaving down but will remain executive chairman, where he will oversee global policy and board activities.
Cook first joined the Apple team in 1998 and became CEO in 2011. During his tenure, the company’s market worth increased from approximately $350 billion to $4 trillion. Each year, the company’s income nearly quadrupled, 2.5 billion gadgets were distributed worldwide, and it even began offering services on a scale that exceeded several Fortune 500 corporations. New product lines, including as watches and earbuds, emerged, as did totally new modes of computing. Supply chains have stretched all over the world, and stores have arisen on every continent imaginable, but it’s the ordinary objects you carry in your pocket that truly tells the story.
HELLO, MACBOOK NEO — Ready for whatever your day brings, MacBook Neo flies through everyday tasks and apps. Choose from four stunning colors in a…
THE MOST COLORFUL MACBOOK LINEUP EVER — Choose from Silver, Blush, Citrus, or Indigo — each with a color-coordinated keyboard to complete the…
POWER FOR EVERYDAY TASKS — Ready the moment you open it, MacBook Neo with the A18 Pro chip delivers the performance and AI capabilities you need to…
John Ternus, on the other hand, began working at Apple in 2001, a year after finishing his mechanical engineering degree. He joined the product design team and worked his way up the hardware engineering hierarchy. By 2013, he was a vice president in charge of all hardware engineering, and he was promoted to senior vice president eight years later. Almost every major device line released by Apple has gone through his teams, including every generation of iPad, multiple iPhone models, AirPods, Apple Watch, and the transition to the Mac’s custom chips, and in recent years his focus has been on using tougher materials, making them easier to repair and less harmful to the environment. He just delivered a large presentation last September to launch the new iPhone line-up, and those who know him claim he can tell right away whether a prototype is good enough.
During the announcement, Tim Cook praised his replacement, describing Ternus as a visionary with impeccable precision and a leader with a strong sense of purpose. Ternus hailed Cook as a mentor and discussed his time working for Steve Jobs. Both guys emphasized that there will be no significant shift in direction at Apple. The values that have guided the organization for 50 years remain in place. However, the fact that Ternus, a hardware expert, is going into the senior position suggests that there may be a modest shift in direction. You see, Cook’s path to success differs significantly from Ternus’. Cook came from an operational background, but Ternus has spent his whole career working directly with the products.
Advertisement
Anyone who has been following the company closely knows that the timing was not unexpected. Rumors about Cook’s plans had been circulating for months, and he had hinted in interviews that he would wait until the proper moment to act. September now gives those two leaders four months to work together harmoniously, and it appears Ternus will also join the board of directors. Arthur Levinson, who has led the board for nearly 15 years, is stepping down to become the lead independent director. Meanwhile, Johny Srouji, a long-time chip designer, has been promoted to chief hardware officer. [Source]
Power lines, storm clouds, and shoes over Seattle. (Kurt Schlosser Photo)
After a vague report that some companies were seeking to build “large” data centers in Seattle, Mayor Katie Wilson is exploring a moratorium on new data centers.
This seems like the typical performative, hypocritical stunt we expect from our politicians. A distraction from harder issues, like ensuring we don’t retrace Cleveland’s history as the economic landscape fractures.
It is easy to ban data centers when you don’t have any (hello Maine!). Seattle’s high real estate and electricity prices mean “large” data centers in the city simply aren’t competitive. We have long had colocation facilities serving local businesses, but they’re quite small by modern standards.
Banning large data centers in Seattle is like banning cattle grazing in midtown Manhattan. Seattle just isn’t going to attract the cutting-edge AI and hyperscaler data centers that require lots of land and power. The Texas panhandle is a better place to put those.
Using data centers to complain about data centers (by posting on Facebook) carries more than a whiff of hypocrisy. Wouldn’t a sincere commitment to “environmental justice” and “economic resilience” mean not using any dastardly data centers? The mayor could abandon all online political messaging. Or order city departments to stop using any data center services.
Advertisement
(Oddly, the City of Seattle’s data center is in Spokane. Which says something about the competitiveness of data centers in Seattle and/or the city’s inclination to support local businesses.)
The Means of Production
A self-proclaimed socialist, Comrade Katie has realized the socialist ideal of owning the means of production, at least of our city-owned utilities. But with ownership comes accountability and responsibility.
By drawing a line against new data centers, she would remove the easiest scapegoat for her performance. No blaming Big Tech. No pointing to AI. What remains is a testable proposition: will Seattle have affordable, reliable power?
Some challenges loom.
Advertisement
Affordable and Reliable Power
Seattle City Light already charges some of the highest electricity prices in Washington, a state that generally enjoys low power costs thanks to abundant hydropower.
Mayor Wilson’s first move was to fire the head of City Light and nominate a replacement with no utility experience. After pushback from both the employees’ union and the City Council, a new leadership search has begun. No explanation has been provided for why the previous CEO was fired or what the mayor’s strategy is for City Light (or, for that matter, anything economic).
Seattle City Light has announced accelerating price increases, well above inflation, for the coming years:
Effective January 1, 2026, you will see the previously approved average rate increase of 5.4% start appearing on your bill.
Business customers can expect to see overall bill increases between 4% to 7%, depending on their customer class and consumption profile.
Advertisement
Looking ahead to 2027 and beyond, we anticipate annual rate increases of 7 to 10%
The utility also needs to nearly double its capacity—from 2,000 to 3,800 megawatts in the next seven years—independent of any data centers. A growing population, electric vehicles, heat pumps, and broader electrification are all driving load growth.
It will take deft management to keep our grid both affordable and reliable. A moratorium on new data centers isn’t enough to keep the lights on in Seattle, and solutions that don’t fit on a bumper sticker seem like a stretch for the political class.
Fresh Water on Tap
While we’re looking at city-owned utilities, Seattle Public Utilities faces serious challenges of its own. The utility recently received a striking vote of no confidence in its ability to provide its most basic service: water.
Advertisement
Eastside cities across Lake Washington, united as the Cascade Water Alliance, get their water from Seattle’s reservoirs. They have concerns about Seattle’s investment and maintenance, and after much analysis and negotiation, the Eastside is switching to get its water from Tacoma:
“[Tacoma Public Utilities’] proposal offered longer supply certainty, greater financial benefit, and an opportunity to move towards a regionalized water system.”
You can read a lot between those lines. The fact it will take 15 years to transition Eastside taps to Tacoma water suggests deep concerns about Seattle’s ability to deliver.
Beyond maintenance worries, this customer exodus also means the smaller remaining base of ratepayers will bear the system’s fixed costs, pointing to higher water bills ahead for Seattleites.
No Excuses
If data centers aren’t coming—and can’t be blamed—then rising electricity prices, capacity shortages, and reliability issues rest squarely with the mayor. The same goes for water.
Advertisement
Grandstanding about data centers is easy. Making difficult and unsatisfying tradeoffs to ensure our city utilities deliver is the hard part.
So by all means, ban the large data centers that were never coming. Clear the field. Remove the distractions.
We can focus entirely on how our city utilities perform under Mayor Wilson.
The Charlie Kirk assassination drove Apple to postpone the release of a politically charged series called “The Savant.” The decision led to pushback, but a new release has been set for July 2026.
‘The Savant’ will debut in July
The more products and services that Apple offers, the more likely it is to cross paths with modern events. While Apple had nothing to do with the murder of Charlie Kirk, it felt the need to push a show’s debut that hit a little too close to home. According to a report from Variety, The Savant will finally debut in July 2026, nearly a year from its original air date. Apple hasn’t updated its release date information on the website, but the news comes direct from show lead Jessica Chastain. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Photo credit: 2 Warps to Neptune In 1974, Nintendo kicked off their coin-operated arcade era with Wild Gunman. This game required players to step up, pull a handgun from a holster, and face off against some unfriendly live-action gunslingers on a projection screen. Footage came from authentic film reels filmed on site in Japan, capturing the wild west-style shootouts in all their gritty grandeur. Timing was everything here. You could only draw and shoot after your eyes flashed and the word “FIRE” appeared on the screen. Get it right, and you’ll come out on top. If you mess up, draw too soon, or miss your shot, you will lose the duel.
Roughly a hundred units left the factory, the majority of which either stranded in warehouses or fell apart over time due to neglect. Today, just one original cabinet remains intact, and it is kept locked away in a private collection. That meant that for about 50 years, no one outside of that collection had the opportunity to play the game as it was intended. Everything changed when Callan Brown got wind of something unusual. The Canadian arcade collector and repair specialist spotted an eBay listing for the original 16mm film reels used in the Wild Gunman arcade cabinet, reportedly sourced from the warehouse of a retired operator in Saskatchewan. Recognizing their rarity, he moved quickly, placed the winning bid, and brought the reels home for his collection.
Officially licensed 1/4 scale TMNT Turtles in Time arcade cabinet by Konami built in wood for collectors and fans of retro arcade machines and mini…
Features the original Turtles in Time arcade ROM delivering authentic beat-’em-up action for enthusiasts who love Teenage Ninja Mutant Turtles and…
Includes mirror screen and vibrant cabinet artwork to replicate the original arcade game’s sci-fi visuals and immersive retro aesthetic
Brown first had to preserve the reels before sending them to a competent facility in Toronto for scanning. Some of the reels showed scratches and dust from years of intensive use, while others appeared to be in perfect condition. He stored the worst pieces safely while keeping the better frames. Unfortunately, two of the four duel sequences remain absent, but there was enough solid content to bring the basic game experience back.
Brown then began the rebuild by creating a basic scale model on his workshop, but things quickly became out of control. The next thing he knew, he was drafting full-size designs, cutting plywood sheets for the cabinet frame, and assembling it piece by piece. His wife, Natasha, worked hard to hand stitch the cloth side panels so they matched the original design flawlessly. On his 3D printer, the front control panel was crisp and clear, and the LED lights worked. Brown even printed the gun’s body and attached it with infrared sensors that tracked movement in the same manner that classic console controllers did.
A single digital projector now manages film playback inside the cabinet, and everything runs on custom Unity code written by Brown. It reads the player’s time, selects the appropriate film clip, verifies the shot position, and awards a badge if the player hits a clean shot. Insert two quarters into the coin slot, and the machine will scream to life. The attract loop plays on the screen, allowing the user to grab the gun. A gunslinger appears on the screen, his eyes flare, and you receive the command to fire. Draw quickly but not too quickly, and then land that shot as the victory music begins to play. Everything feels just like the original game from the 1970s.
A new email from Sony says that PlayStation will require players to verify their age later this year to keep using communication features like messages and voice chat. Insider-Gaming reports: The initiative comes from the goal of providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences for players and families while respecting their privacy” and providing “meaningful control over their gaming experiences.” The age-verification process will be implemented globally, and players will need to verify their age to continue using PlayStation communication services, such as messages and voice chat. If the player opts not to verify their age, they can still use other services, such as games, trophies, and the store. Only the communication experience will be affected if you choose not to verify your age. PlayStation didn’t provide a date for when players will need to begin the verification process.
Despite a bunch of Republican lawmakers being extremely (and mostly performatively) upset that their communications were accessed during investigations of the January 2021 insurrection attempt, the current version of the Trump administration seems to prefer a clean re-authorization of the surveillance powers it so recently deemed a dangerous part of the “deep state.”
The FISA court recently blessed an extension of this NSA collection, provided the government fixed the most problematic parts of it — that being other IC agencies’ warrantless access to US persons’ communications via “backdoor” searches of the foreign-facing surveillance dragnet.
Trump was having none of this, pressing the GOP to simply give the administration an un-reformed, un-repaired Section 702 that would presumably allow it to engage in the same abuses it was crying about less than a half-decade ago.
Fortunately for every American only allowed to vote by proxy every two-to-four years for surveillance reform, there is still no clean re-authorization on the books. The senator whose name is synonymous with surveillance reform — Ron Wyden — recently had this to say in his Bluesky post:
Advertisement
Update on where things stand on FISA: this deal is a win. We got the House to back down from an 18 month extension, buying us time to negotiate on real reforms. I’ll be fighting like hell for reforms that put your privacy first, and will have more to share soon.
Update on where things stand on FISA: this deal is a win. We got the House to back down from an 18 month extension, buying us time to negotiate on real reforms. I’ll be fighting like hell for reforms that put your privacy first, and will have more to share soon.
Not that congressional majority leader Mike Johnson wasn’t trying his damnedest to round up GOP support for a clean renewal that would give Trump what he wanted, and very little of what the GOP actually wanted, given its years of complaining about the FBI’s warrantless access to their communications.
Johnson’s dazzling play to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by five years ended in an excruciating defeat, as the bill failed after 20 Republicans joined Democrats in striking it down. One major reason it lost was that the warrant language baked into that measure not only would have codified existing law, but also would have made it easier for Section 702–acquired data to be used against Americans in criminal proceedings.
The 200-220 vote was called at 1:22 early Friday morning.
Advertisement
Baratta’s report refers to this as an “eleventh hour” burst of activity, but it’s actually well past that hour. We’re looking at 13th to 14th hour desperation here, especially since Johnson went back to the well again shortly after this first defeat.
The other shoe dropped during the vote on a rule to consider a clean 18-month extension of Section 702. That rule also failed at 2:07 a.m. in a 197-228 vote.
Given that the average congressional rep is pushing 58, both votes occurred well after bedtime. It’s a testimony to the resistance to clean re-authorization of Section 702 powers that these many reps were still on the floor to shut down Mike Johnson twice.
It also shows that Mike Johnson isn’t actually leading the Republican party. He’s restricted to doing whatever Trump wants, even if that clashes with what many party members want. To get skunked twice in two hours is embarrassing, which means Johnson may not remain majority leader for long, even if Democrats can’t flip the House following the mid-terms.
The good news is this: Congress only has until the end of this month to get a re-authorization passed. If it hopes to prevent this surveillance power from lapsing, Johnson and his fellow surveillance hawks are going to have to make some concessions, which may (finally!) include warrant requirements for searches of US persons’ communications by IC agencies with access to NSA collections.
Advertisement
On the other hand, when push comes to shove, far too many Republicans are willing to be Trump’s doormat and argue against their own interests, along with the interests of the constituents. But this is the most concerted challenge to Section 702 mounted yet. Even the Snowden leaks didn’t manage to get this done. But even if reforms are finally put in place, the public should remember GOP lawmakers did this because they want to shield themselves from domestic surveillance. That it might better protect their constituents is just an unavoidable side effect of their self-interest.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login