Politics
Fox News cuts off reporter describing Trumpian foreknowledge of shooting attack
The US Fox News channel cut off one of its own reporters just as she seemed about to give away what people are saying is foreknowledge among Donald Trump’s inner circle about the ‘assassination attempt’ at this year’s White House Correspondents Dinner.
White House Correspondents Dinner ‘shooter’
Trump had said, for the first time ever, that he would attend. An alleged shooter then tried to rush past guards before being detained.
View on Threads
But many people on social media are wondering if Trump knew about it beforehand. This is because Fox correspondent Aishah Hasnie was seated with Nicholas Riccio, the husband of Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
Riccio, she said, told her “You do a good job… you need to be safe tonight” then looked around the room suggestively. But Fox stopped Hasnie even finishing the sentence:
View this post on Instagram
That was far from the only weird aspect of the event. Several journalists talked about the lack of security at the event. Bags were not even being checked, and at least two correspondents said they left almost as soon as they arrived because it “felt wrong”:
Trump looked entirely unconcerned, even smirking, as the White House Correspondents Dinner ‘attack’ happened:
Chaotic footage of President Trump being evacuated pic.twitter.com/KzageVO0h0
— Acyn (@Acyn) April 26, 2026
The lack of urgency among bodyguards to remove Trump was clear, with vice-president JD Vance rushed out relatively quickly – before anyone went to remove Trump:
Pro-Israel Trump figures seemed to know the identity of the alleged shooter before the name had been announced:
View this post on Instagram
A photo of Allen, face down and handcuffed, was given to Trump within moments so he could post it on his ‘Truth Social’ platform, as political commentator Tom Santos observed:
Active crime scene. Alleged shooter in the same building as the President and Vice President of the United States.
And someone gets to snap pictures like this of the shooter and then send them to Trump so he could use them on his socials moments later.
Totally legit. pic.twitter.com/gBNU2AhkRv
— Tom Santos (@tommysantos14) April 26, 2026
Trump later took the opportunity to say the attempted shooting justified his ridiculous new White House ballroom – and was amplified by dozens of MAGA accounts in a clearly coordinated campaign.
Build the White House Ballroom. pic.twitter.com/3CBVZtf4cK
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) April 26, 2026
Santos found it all a bit too much to swallow:
You want me to believe that:
– This is something like the 3rd or 4th Secret Service failure.
– Tump boycotts the correspondence dinner every year.
– He’s pitching an unnecessary ballroom no one asked for.
– And there happens to be a shooter incident at the event when a large…— Tom Santos (@tommysantos14) April 26, 2026
He’s surely not the only one.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Scottish election candidate slams Gordon Ramsay over ‘deeply disturbing’ seabird hunt footage
A Scottish parliament candidate has criticised celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay for participating in “one of the most shameful activities in Scotland.”
Robert Pownall, standing in the Edinburgh Central seat, has called on Ramsay to “do the right thing”. This is after footage resurfaced from an episode of Ramsay’s show, The F Word. In it, he travels to the Isle of Lewis to cook and eat young gannet chicks – known as “guga”.
In the segment, Ramsay is seen recoiling from the bird’s carcass. He describes the smell as “worse than rotten eggs” and says it “looks like something out of an Alien film.”
Pownall said the footage was “deeply disturbing and disrespectful.”
The criticism comes as Pownall launches his bid for Scottish parliament. He’s campaigning as a giant gannet, demanding the removal of the legal exemption that allows the guga hunt to continue.
Each year, a group of hunters travels to the uninhabited island of Sula Sgeir. They take gannet chicks from their nests using poles and nooses before killing them with blows to the head. They take the birds, who aren’t yet old enough to fly, back to the Isle of Lewis where they sell and consume them as a local delicacy.
The guga hunt is Scotland’s last remaining legal seabird hunt. It’s legal due to a special exemption in the Wildlife and Countryside Act.
Gordon Ramsay accused of ‘celebrating cruel activity’
Speaking on 27 April, independent candidate Pownall said:
Gordon Ramsay travelled hundreds of miles to take part in the killing of defenceless seabird chicks and turned it into entertainment. That is shameful.
This cruel activity should be challenged, not celebrated.
The comments come amid growing concern over the status of gannets and other seabirds.
Sula Sgeir, the island where the hunt takes place, is the only Special Protection Area for Gannets in Scotland to have shrunk while others grow. That’s according to documents which Pownall’s organisation Protect the Wild obtained. Pownall says this shows the hunt is undermining the colony’s ability to recover.
Gannets have also been hit hard by avian flu, with populations declining significantly in recent years. Pownall added:
Gannets are already under extreme pressure from disease, climate change and industrial fishing. They cannot afford another threat – least of all one driven by human greed.
This practice is not about survival, necessity, or nourishing communities. It is about killing wild animals for tradition and taste. And that is simply not okay.
The candidate has now issued an open letter to Gordon Ramsay, accusing him of turning the hunt into a “spectacle” and calling on him to now publicly oppose the practice.
Pownall is aiming to bring national attention to the issue ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament election, and is calling on all parties and the future government to commit to ending the guga hunt.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
Politics
These critical policies make ‘developing’ countries advanced
There are policies in what we condescendingly call ‘developing countries’ that actually make them more advanced than the UK in crucial ways.
Developing countries and home ownership
Things like homes and utilities are the basics of life, yet countries we refer to as ‘developing’ often have better models than nations we call ‘advanced’.
Many lower-income countries have high rates of home ownership. Kazakhstan tops the table with 98% of the population owning their own home. In Laos, it’s 96%, and in India, it’s 87%. Many countries in Eastern Europe also have home ownership rates of above 90%.
And then there’s the UK, where 65% of people own their own home. Actually owning the place one lives in makes sense because one isn’t renting and has a place to call their own. It’s a better option than private or state landlordism.
Water ownership
Water is another essential and in developing countries, 90% have water in public ownership.
While state ownership doesn’t solve everything on its own, it’s more efficient to remove profit from essentials or natural monopolies. Non-effective management or a lack of investment can happen in the public or private sector.
Then there’s the UK, where water and sewage is privatised and investment goes to dividends rather than fixing issues.
As stated, ‘developing countries’ with public ownership can also suffer from a lack of investment but the basic policy of non-privatisation is more advanced for utilities.
Electricity ownership
Further, in surveyed developing countries, 71% had electricity in majority public ownership.
What about the UK? Well, even the national grid is privatised. The grid infrastructure made £5 billion in profit in 2025.
The UK previously had publicly owned utilities and a higher home ownership rate. So we’ve actually ‘advanced’ in the wrong direction, while ‘developing’ countries are ahead in some quite critical ways.
Featured image via Pixabay/ sarangib
By James Wright
Politics
“Not one more”: thousands rally in Belfast against gender-based violence
Thousands of protestors marched in Belfast at the weekend to condemn the north of Ireland’s appalling rates of violence against women. Between 2020 and 2025, a shocking 30 women were murdered. This is the highest rate across Britain and Ireland, and over three times the figure in the south of Ireland for the same period.
The socialist-feminist movement ROSA organised the march. The route went from the Royal Courts of Justice to City Hall. Protestors held banners reading “Not One More”, meaning no one else should suffer the fate of women like Natalie McNally. She was horrifically murdered by her partner in 2022 while 15 weeks pregnant.
Natalie’s brother Brendan spoke at the City Hall. He said of his sister:
I knew her as the gentlest of people who would have sympathised for anyone in a difficult situation. She worked here in Belfast and supported and was involved in various activist movements.
“Criminal negligence”: vulnerable women left exposed by housing shortage
People Before Profit’s Fiona Ferguson cited the economic factors endangering women under our cruel capitalist model:
In 2026, violent misogyny and sexism should be a relic of the past, it should be a matter for the dustbin of history. But the reality is that right now, today, far too many women in our society are living in violent homes that they cannot escape from.
There are no public houses available because the waiting lists are too long. Refuges are oversubscribed because cuts have been made by the storming executives to services like women did. And women do not have economic freedom because of cuts to social security and they cannot escape. That’s criminal negligence.
The latest horrendous figures show 50,000 people waiting for a home. Ferguson’s comments echo those we previously reported from Sinn Féin MLA Deirdre Hargey, who called out:
…blockages in housing for women who are in situations where there is violence perpetrated against them.
ROSA themselves have cited the need to “end poverty wages” and fight back against an economic order that:
…allows wealthy and powerful men to abuse ordinary people rampantly.
Ferguson also slammed the far-right who falsely claim to act as the protectors of women and children:
We are facing a growing global right-wing movement that is coming for our rights. Fuck them! Right here in Ireland, North and South, there are people who want to see the politics of Donald Trump brought to our streets and brought to our doorsteps.
We cannot let them. Some of those people are organising far-right rallies in our city centre. Some of them are writing laws in Stormont.
One of the ways that the far-right are trying to grow is by using the fear that women face every day. Fear of violence, fear of sexual harassment, fear of rape and fear of femicide. And they want us to blame migrants and they want us to blame trans people. We won’t do it.
Research by The Detail found that:
Almost half those arrested for race hate disorder in Belfast last August had previously been reported to the PSNI for domestic abuse…
Continuing austerity in Belfast impacting women
ROSA asked women why they were marching in Belfast. One activist said:
I’m marching against gender-based violence because Stormont claims to care about violence against women and girls while making cuts to vital voluntary and charitable services that support victims and survivors.
This is likely a reference to changes the Department of Health made to grant allocation in 2023, that resulted in some women’s support charities losing money.
Another recent change by Westminster resulted in a nearly £16 million drop to funding of voluntary and community sector organisations in the Six Counties, particularly those providing support for unemployed people. Stormont has not found a way to plug the gap. The Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (NICVA) specifically cited the impact this would have on women.
Despite the many moving placards at the protest, ROSA used their Facebook platform to call for people to get actively involved in campaigning for an end to misogynistic violence:
Not one more can’t just be a slogan – it must be a call to action! DM this page if you want to be involved in a campaign against gender based violence.
Featured image via ROSA
Politics
Trump makes clear shooter’s ‘manifesto’ paedo traitor comments aimed at him
Donald Trump has made clear that he believes ‘shooter’ Cole Allen’s ‘manifesto‘ comments about a “paedophile rapist and traitor” were about him. The slip came as a rattled Trump denied any wrongdoing during a 60 Minutes interview after the event.
Trump: yes, the manifesto was about me…
Trump’s interviewer Norah O’Donnell asked about Allen’s “stunning” document, which was sent to family members minutes before the incident. She then noted that it said Allen was “no longer willing to permit a paedophile, rapist and traitor to coat my hands in his crimes”.
Trump lashed out, claiming he was being asked this because the 60 Minutes crew are “horrible people”. But, as O’Donnell pointed out, he had immediately assumed the “paedophile rapist and traitor” in the comment was him. Cue more tantrums and denial:
Trump even claimed he had been “totally exonerated”. Not quite. He appears thousands of times in the Epstein files, even though his Department of Justice has released only two percent of them, in heavily redacted form. And he is accused in those files, among other things, of raping and beating at least one thirteen-year-old child and watching as the same or another thirteen-year-old’s baby was dumped in a lake.
Jean Carroll also won almost $90m in damages from the president in a civil case after she accused him of sexual assault. Although the case did not prove rape according to New York State’s narrow definition of penetrative sex, appeal judge Lewis A Kaplan said that the allegation of rape was “substantially true” and Trump’s appeal argument was “entirely unpersuasive“. “Totally exonerated”? Right.
Even CBS, now owned and run by pro-Trump fanatical Israel supporters, can rattle Trump into such telling give-aways.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Trump Claims BBC Used AI To Doctor His Capitol Riot Speech
Donald Trump has falsely accused the BBC of using AI to fake his comments in a Panorama programme about January 6.
The US president has a multi-billion dollar lawsuit out against the corporation after it spliced together different sections of a speech he gave on the day of the 2021 Capitol riot.
Trump is suing for defamation, claiming the edits suggest he had directly encouraged his supporters to storm the government building.
The lawsuit, filed in the US, already accuses the BBC of “intentionally, maliciously and deceptively doctoring” the president’s speech.
Trump has now insisted AI was used to alter his words altogether.
“The BBC has me – actually AI.” he told CBS’s 60 Minutes. “They have me saying a horrible statement. I said, ‘I never said that.’
“It turns out they gave me an AI. They had my lips speaking words of hate, tremendous hate, which I never said.
“They don’t know what to do. They’ve admitted they’re wrong, they just don’t know what to do.
“They actually had me making a major statement, and it wasn’t me. It was my face, it was my lips. My lips were perfectly in sync with the words.
“I said, ‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it.’”
The Panorama clip showed the president as saying: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol… and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.”
Trump did say those words during his speech – but in two separate segments.
He told the crowd: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
More than 50 minutes later, he said: “And we fight. We fight like hell.”
The BBC has been approached for comment.
The corporation has previously apologised to the White House over the edit but rejected calls for compensation.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
JK Rowling vs Alastair Campbell: the lies aren’t working anymore
The post JK Rowling vs Alastair Campbell: the lies aren’t working anymore appeared first on spiked.
Politics
Sabastian Sawe makes history with London marathon win
On a sunlit Sunday in April, the London Marathon rewrote the limits of human endurance. Sabastian Sawe of Kenya crossed the finish line in 1:59:30, becoming the first man to record an official sub-two-hour marathon. He shaved 35 seconds off the previous world record.
The race that changed the record books
From the gun, the elite men’s race unfolded as a high‑precision experiment in pacing and resolve.
Sawe and a small group of rivals pushed a relentless tempo across the 42.195‑kilometre course.
Making a decisive solo move in the final two kilometres, Sawe sprinted down The Mall past Buckingham Palace to seal history. Yomif Kejelcha of Ethiopia, making his marathon debut, finished a breath behind in 1:59:41. Jacob Kiplimo took bronze in 2:02:28.
The numbers underline how extraordinary the performance was: Sawe averaged roughly 2:50 per kilometre and reached the half-marathon split in about 59:45 – a pace that demands both physiological excellence and tactical courage.
Reaction
Sawe’s reaction captured the mixture of humility and conviction that often accompanies epochal sporting moments. Reflected on the generational shift in marathon running and the preparation that made the run possible, Sawe said:
for the new generation, to run a record is possible.
He added that he had been “well‑prepared” and “had a lot of courage to push.”
Kejelcha, who had shadowed Sawe for much of the race, praised Sawe’s stance on clean sport. He noted the example Sawe set by undergoing extra voluntary drug tests before previous victories. He also described the approach as “very important for clean sport”, suggesting he might adopt similar measures in future.
A Marathon like no other
Breaking two hours in a marathon has been a long‑standing milestone.
Eliud Kipchoge famously ran 1:59:40 in Vienna in 2019 during the Nike‑backed 1:59 Challenge. This was a controlled event that used rotating pacemakers and other aids, and therefore was not eligible for an official world record.
Sawe’s run in London, by contrast, came in an open championship setting on a largely flat city course. It is now recorded in the official annals of the sport.
The progression of the men’s world record over the past quarter century, from times in the 2:05 range to the sub‑two barrier, reflects advances in training, nutrition, shoe technology, and race strategy. Sawe’s performance will be studied for how those elements combined on a single day to produce a new benchmark.
Women’s race and wheelchair events
The elite women’s race produced its own headline: Tigst Assefa of Ethiopia retained her London title and lowered her own course record to 2:15:41, improving on the mark she set the previous year.
Assefa pulled away in the closing stages to hold off Hellen Obiri and Joyciline Jepkosgei, who finished within seconds of one another.
In the wheelchair divisions, Switzerland’s Marcel Hug extended his dominance with a sixth consecutive and eighth overall men’s win. Meanwhile, Catherine Debrunner claimed her third straight women’s wheelchair title after an electrifying sprint finish.
Record-Breaking Aftermath
Sawe’s sub‑two performance will ripple through elite distance running. Coaches and athletes will dissect splits, fuelling strategies, and environmental conditions to understand how to replicate or counter such a run.
Race organisers and governing bodies will also face renewed scrutiny over course certification, pacing rules, and anti‑doping safeguards as the sport adapts to a new normal where the two‑hour barrier is no longer theoretical but an official milestone that has been passed in championship conditions.
Going Forward
For the public, the moment is special. It was a reminder that athletic boundaries are porous and records are not untouchable.
Sawe’s run in London will stand as a defining chapter in marathon history – one that reframes what the next generation of distance runners will consider possible.
By Faz Ali
Politics
Jaz Sinclair Addresses Gen V Cancellation: ‘There’s So Much I Wanna Say’
Gen V star Jaz Sinclair has spoken out following the news that the show has been dropped by Prime Video.
Jaz played Marie Moreau in both seasons of the The Boys spin-off, sharing the screen with the likes of Lizze Broadway, London Thor, Derek Luhn and the late Chance Perdomo.
However, over the weekend it was announced that, despite glowing reviews for both seasons of Gen V, the satirical superhero series would not be getting a third outing.
Reacting to the news on Sunday night, Jaz told her Instagram followers: “There’s so much I wanna (and will) say, but for today I just want to say thank you from the bottom of my heart.
“I’m so happy you’re here and I’m so grateful for this incredible experience.”

Although Gen V will not be moving forward, executive producers Eric Kripke and Evan Goldberg have said in a statement that its central characters will be back in action in the ongoing fifth season of The Boys, as well as other projects set in the same universe.
“While we wish we could keep the party going another season at Godolkin, we’re committed to continuing the Gen V characters’ stories in The Boys season five and other VCU projects on the horizon,” they insisted.
“You’ll see them again.”
Season five of The Boys is currently airing on Prime Video.
Like previous seasons, The Boys’ latest run has once again been a hit with critics, receiving a coveted score in the high 90s on the reviews aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes.
It was previously reported that this fifth season would be the last outing of The Boys, although more spin-offs are still in the works.
Most notably, a new off-shoot of The Boys titled Vought Rising is expected to arrive on Prime Video in 2027.
Aya Cash and Jensen Ackles will take the lead as Stormfront and Soldier Boy, respectively, having both previously played the characters in early seasons of The Boys.
Politics
Keir Starmer Faces Possible Sleaze Probe Over Mandelson Scandal
Keir Starmer is facing yet another bruising week over the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal.
Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee will continue its probe into the affair, with the prime minister’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, giving evidence on Tuesday.
But it is the possibility of Starmer being investigated by the cross-party Privileges Committee for misleading parliament which is causing most concern inside 10 Downing Street.
Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle is expected to announce on Monday afternoon if MPs will be given a vote tomorrow on whether the PM should be referred to the powerful committee.
Here, HuffPost UK explains the background to the latest controversy to hit Starmer and assesses the damage it could do to the beleaguered PM.
What Is Starmer Accused Of?
There are two strands to the accusations against the PM.
His critics say he misled the Commons by previously insisting that “due process” was followed when Mandelson was vetted for the role of UK ambassador to Washington.
It has subsequently emerged that UK Security Vetting had recommended the then Labour peer be denied clearance to take up the role.
However, the Foreign Office decided that the risks highlighted over his business links to Russia and China could be mitigated, and he was given the highest security clearance, known as “developed vetting”.
The second accusation centres around comments Starmer made at prime minister’s questions last week.
He said that “no pressure existed whatsoever” in getting the Foreign Office to give Mandelson security clearance.
But that had been contradicted the previous day by Sir Olly Robbins, who was sacked by Starmer for not telling him about UK Security Vetting’s concerns.
Giving evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee, Sir Olly said there was “constant pressure” on his department from No.10 and there was an “atmosphere of constant chasing”.
What Has Starmer Said?
In a Sunday Times interview, the PM insisted there was no inconsistency between his comments and Sir Olly’s.
He said there was “different types of pressure” in government.
“There’s pressure – ’Can we get this done quickly?’ – which is not an unusual pressure. That is the everyday pressure of government,” he said.
Starmer said a pressure “essentially, to disregard the security vetting element and give clearance” would be something different, and that Sir Olly “was really clear in his mind that wasn’t pressure that was put on him”.
Will He Face A Sleaze Probe?
Even if Hoyle grants MPs a vote on referring the PM to the Privileges Committee, it would require a huge Labour rebellion for it to pass.
According to The Times, No.10 is planning to whip Labour MPs to vote against a probe, making it a major test of the under-fire prime minister’s authority.
One Labour MP told HuffPost UK the issue was a “complete waste of time” and insisted there was no comparison with the Privileges Committee investigation Boris Johnson faced over partygate.
He said: “Boris Johnson’s parties in breach of lockdown rules were of a wholly different magnitude of severity. Besides, the PM has been truthful about due process throughout.”
Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP who chairs the Foreign Affairs Committee, accused the Tories of playing political games ahead of the elections on May 7.
She said: “It may be that at some stage in the future some of the questions haven’t been answered and it is decided that they are of sufficient importance that the Privileges Committee should be involved but I don’t really see why we are doing it at the moment apart from potentially people trying to score points in advance of the local elections.
“I’m sorry to say that and I’m not supposed to be partisan on this but it is plain as the nose on my face what’s going on here.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
How Much Sleep And Exercise Actually Reduces Dementia Risk?
Though people with dementia tend to face sleep disruptions, it’s a bit of a “chicken and egg” link: “Does poor sleep increase dementia risk, or does dementia lead to poor sleep?” Alzheimer’s Society said.
“Some researchers believe that both of these theories could be true, and the relationship could be circular.”
Whatever the direction of the link, though, one paper found that those who got fewer than six hours of sleep in midlife were less likely to develop dementia.
And a new paper published in PLOS One, which involved data from dozens of other studies, says there may be a “sweet spot” for reducing dementia risk.
Seven to eight hours’ sleep may be best for reducing dementia risk
The data the researchers used came from millions of people aged 35 and over across decades of research. It looked at day-to-day habits, like rest and movement, and compared those to the rate of dementia among participants.
Parmis Mirzadeh, who helped to write the study, said these studies “provided an opportunity to better understand how daily habits like physical activity, sedentary time and sleep collectively shape brain health over time”.
They found that seven to eight hours’ sleep was linked to a lower dementia risk, while both more and less sleep were associated with an increased likelihood of developing the condition.
The longer sleep pattern (regularly getting more than eight hours’ sleep) was most associated with higher dementia risk.
Previous research has shown that people who sleep more than nine hours a night are more likely to develop dementia 10 years later.
Any other links?
Yes. These researchers also looked at how physical activity and sedentary behaviours seemed to be linked to people’s dementia risk.
They found that people who stuck to the recommended 150 minutes of physical activity a week were 25% less likely to face dementia.
“One of the more surprising findings was how sparse the data remains for sedentary behaviour, despite it being recognised as a distinct health risk for more than a decade,” Mirzadeh stated.
Nonetheless, researchers think sitting for more than eight hours a day may increase dementia risk.
“We hope this work helps raise awareness that everyday behaviours such as physical activity, sedentary time and sleep are associated with brain health,” Mirzadeh added. “Because these are modifiable, they represent practical targets for interventions aimed at reducing dementia risk at the population level.”
It’s worth noting, however, that this paper only looked at associations and did not prove a causal link.
-
Politics7 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World2 days agoHyperliquid $HYPE Rally Builds Momentum as AI Sector Enters Prove-It Phase
-
Crypto World7 days agoBank of Hawai’i (BOH) Q1 2026: Net Income Drops to $57.4M as Net Interest Margin Expands
-
Politics5 days agoMaking troops accountable for war crimes threatens US alliance, ex-SAS colonel warns
-
Politics5 days agoDisabled people challenge government SEND proposals over segregation concerns
-
Business5 days agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Business3 days agoPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
-
Politics5 days agoZack Polanski responds to home secretary’s taser threat
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Five Value Stocks with Recovery Potential in 2026: PayPal (PYPL), Nike (NKE), and More
-
Politics5 days agoStarmer handler McSweeney to be dragged from shadows by Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Sports23 hours agoIPL 2026: Ruturaj Gaikwad registers slowest fifty of the season, enters all-time unwanted list | Cricket News
-
Politics5 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | How To Get Away With Crimes
-
Crypto World6 days agoNew York sues Coinbase, Gemini over prediction market offerings
-
Politics5 days ago‘Iran is still a nuclear threat’
-
Entertainment6 days ago
Sydney Sweeney cameo cut from “The Devil Wears Prada 2”, source explains why (exclusive)
-
Crypto World6 days agoCrypto’s great hope in Senate’s Clarity Act still has a path to survive tight calendar
-
Business5 days agoHCL Tech share price tank over 9% after weak Q4. JPMorgan, HSBC & 3 others cut target price
-
Sports4 days agoTim Bradley names the current best in the world: “Better than Inoue and Usyk”
-
NewsBeat1 day agoLK Bennett closes all stores after entering administration

You must be logged in to post a comment Login