Politics
Macroprolactinoma Symptoms: Why My Pituitary Tumour Was Misdiagnosed As Menopause For Years
You know your body better than anyone – but what happens when no one listens? Welcome to Ms Diagnosed: a HuffPost UK series uncovering the reality of medical gaslighting. With new stats showing that 8 in 10 of women have felt unheard by medical professionals, we’re sharing the stories of seven whose lives were nearly lost to the gap between their symptoms and a system that refused to listen. As the UK introduces Jess’s Rule – a new mandate for GPs to ‘rethink’ after a third visit – we’re exploring why the medical system is still failing women and how we can start to fix it.
The GP folded her hands between her thighs, spun round in her chair and gave me a deeply patronising look.
“I think you’re a bit stressed, love,” she said.
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing; I knew my symptoms were down to far more than stress.
As it turned out, I was right. I wasn’t stressed; I had a brain tumour on my pituitary gland, known as a macroprolactinoma. But despite going to my GP repeatedly with increasingly unnerving symptoms, I had been told – again and again – that I was just going through the menopause.
My symptoms started in March 2011, when I was around 34. I started getting really heavy periods that were soaking through pads, tampons and even my jeans; but then, all of a sudden, my periods completely stopped.
After around four months with no period, I went to my local GP surgery where I saw a nurse who told me to give it until six months before taking further action.
So I did; but in those next two months, my hair started falling out. Whenever I’d brush it, my hair would completely fill the hairbrush.
Then, things started getting really strange.
That summer, I went to Cardiff on the train – and for some reason, I couldn’t stop worrying about where to sit in case the train tipped over onto one side.
I was completely paranoid and panicking all the way there. I couldn’t understand how everyone else in that carriage had been able to sit down without a second thought.
It was bizarre; but I put it out of my mind and went back to the doctor’s about my missing periods.
I had a blood test to check if I’d gone through the menopause, and the results said no further action was required. I was adamant that that wasn’t the end of the story, though – periods don’t just stop for no reason – so I booked to see the GP.
“I think you’ve gone through the menopause,” she said. “Even though the blood test says you haven’t, it’s not always correct.”
So I went away; but then, I started having issues with my memory.
Once, for example, I was watching Barack Obama speaking on the news; and I could not remember his first name. I knew who he was; I just couldn’t place the name. I scrolled mentally through the alphabet; nothing. I Googled him and thought: “Oh. Barack. I’d never have come up with that.”
I went back to the GP again. That was when she told me I might be “a bit stressed”.
I had no choice but to leave again; but the memory issues continued, so I booked yet another appointment.
“You’ve been having a lot of appointments recently,” the receptionist said to me. “Are you sure they’re all necessary?”.
I started to feel like a pain. Then I thought: “No, I want to get to the bottom of this” – because by now, things were getting scary. I’d recently found a denim jacket in my wardrobe and had absolutely no idea where it had come from. My daughter told me I’d bought it when we’d gone shopping in Birmingham; but I didn’t even have any recollection of going to Birmingham.
So I went ahead and I booked my appointment. While I was driving there, I approached the roundabout; and I had absolutely no idea which way round to go.
I realised I wasn’t only a danger to myself. I was now a danger to others, too.
When I got to the GP’s office, she still seemed incredibly smug. I told her what had happened at the roundabout, and she said, “Well, this is just part of the menopause”.
“It’s not,’ I insisted. ’There is something else going on. I’m not exaggerating; this is not right. It’s not right. I want a second opinion.”
In the end, she agreed to refer me to a gynaecologist – because menopause was still suspected to be the root cause of my symptoms – and I paid to be fasttracked. By now, I was terrified.
I told the gynaecologist everything, and he asked me if I’d ever had a prolactin test.
“My memory isn’t very good – but I don’t think I’ve heard that word before,” I said, carefully.
He sent me to the blood unit that very day to get my prolactin levels checked; and then, at 8:00pm that night, he phoned me at home. “Your prolactin is very, very high; and I think that means you’ve possibly got a brain tumour,” he told me. “I’d like you to come back in for an MRI.”
I felt utterly numb – but gradually, it dawned on me that I was single and had a 14-year-old daughter. I’ve never felt so alone or scared.
The MRI confirmed the diagnosis; I had a brain tumour. The doctors suspected it was benign, but they couldn’t be sure until I had my first surgery to try and remove it.
That surgery confirmed that it was, indeed, benign; but ‘benign’ doesn’t mean ‘fine’. It means the tumour is less likely to progress around the body, but the tumour I have is still aggressive and life-limiting. My quality of life is not what I expected it to be at 49. I can’t do exercise; I can’t cook meals; I can’t drive; and I struggle to hold conversations for more than 30 minutes.
Once, I went to talk to my partner and all I could say was something about a swimming pool, which wasn’t what I meant to say at all.
I’m still so angry with that GP. If the tumour had been found sooner, it wouldn’t have grown so big – the type of tumour I have is aggressive and fast-growing. By now, it’s managed to spread itself further than my pituitary gland; including growing near an artery and my optic chiasm, which makes it much harder to remove.
I’ve had four surgeries, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (twice, ten years apart); but the tumour keeps re-growing, albeit a little slower since the chemotherapy. But I can always tell when that’s happening.
After the first surgery, my periods did come back; but then, two years later, they stopped again. Another time, my memory became very strange again; a third time, I experienced more hair loss; and most recently, I had extreme tiredness.
I’ve been told there is one more surgery they can try; but that surgery will make me blind in my right eye.
Equally, though, I now appreciate life so much more than I ever did before. Without the tumour, I never would have started my own business; and even though I went to a very dark place last year, after the chemotherapy, I still have hope. You never know what could be around the corner.
These days, I just want to raise awareness of both my condition and the need to advocate for ourselves. While most GPs are incredible – including my current GP – we know, intrinsically, if there’s something wrong in our bodies. We need that tenacity to say, if needed, ‘I need an MRI’, or ‘I need a second opinion’.
And if, like I did, you feel like a pain – remember, it doesn’t matter. You just need to push, push and push in order to get the answers you need.
For more information and support, visit The Pituitary Foundation.
Politics
Experts Say Hotel Elevators Are The Germiest Spot In Any Hotel
When you check into your hotel stay, you are expecting to start your vacation ― but it could also be where you start spreading germs and diseases.
That’s because hotels are full of high-touch surface areas that many people will regularly touch with a number of different unclean hands.
The problem is that you cannot trust your fellow travellers to practice good hand hygiene. “People just simply aren’t washing their hands properly in the first place, and then they’re washing them even less properly when they’re on vacation,” said microbiologist Jason Tetro aka “The Germ Guy,” citing faecal bacteria and Staphylococcus bacteria as two easily spreadable germs to watch out for.
“If you come into contact with any bacteria or virus, you pretty much have about a four-hour risk of getting exposed to it, if you happen to touch your face or put your fingers in your mouth,” Tetro explained.
And out of all the high-touch surfaces in a hotel, germ experts warn that elevator buttons for the first floor can be the biggest overlooked culprit.

Jackyenjoyphotography via Getty Images
“Everybody touches the first floor [elevator button] to get out,” said Chuck Gerba, a microbiologist at the University of Arizona. “I have to knuckle elevator buttons these days, because we’ve sampled enough of them.”
When Mary Spitzer was a researcher at the Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health at the University of Arizona, she led a study where she evaluated viral spread and infection risks in a hotel lobby and found that first-floor elevator buttons were the most frequently touched fomite, or object that helps transmit infectious diseases.
As part of this, she sat in a lobby and noted what surfaces were being touched by what people and in what order. “Pretty consistently, it’d be hotel button first, obviously, because they’re coming down into the lobby,” Spitzer said.
People don’t typically touch an elevator button for long, but even a quick press has spread potential, because viruses can stay alive for hours or days. Tetro said that flu and COVID viruses could live on elevator button surfaces for four to eight hours, for example.
Once someone coughs and sneezes onto an elevator button, just you pressing that button “for that very short period of time is enough for you to pick up enough virus from that residue that’s been there,” Tetro said.
Beyond hotel elevators, Tetro warned that other high-touch surface areas in hotels like doorknobs, remote controls, light switches, alarm clocks, telephones, and ice buckets in particular can be full of germs “because they probably never get washed or disinfected.”
The good news is that one simple solution for hotels is to clean high-touch surface areas more purposefully. In Spitzer’s study, targeted cleaning on high-touch surface areas like refrigerator handles and credit card readers led to a significant reduction in viral load.
And you can always take matters into your own hands ― pun intended ― by practicing good health hygiene.
When in doubt, wash your hands or immediately use hand sanitiser when you are using a communal hotel space. “Touching things is sort of unavoidable” in hotels, Spitzer said. After you touch that elevator button, “be mindful of where you’re then putting your hands,” Spitzer suggested. “Are you touching your face? Are you touching your kid’s face? Are you eating things?”
This way, your vacation doesn’t end sooner than it has to because you got yourself sick.
Politics
These Red Flags Are Signs You Have A ‘Low Effort’ Family
Have you ever checked the family group text, days after you shared something important/impressive/timely/hilarious/heartfelt, only to realise everyone’s response was… crickets?
If this is a constant in your communications, you may be dealing with a “low-effort family” – a type of often-invisible family dysfunction.
Low-effort families can fly under the radar because there are no yelling matches, explosive fights or even obvious conflict. From the outside, things might look great – even calmer than the average family.
But if, beneath the surface, there’s one person doing 95% of the emotional heavy lifting for a family of four (or an extended family of 15), something is definitely amiss.
Here’s what the experts say about this family dynamic – and how to cope in healthy ways (that aren’t just continuing to blow up the group chat).
What is a low-effort family?
“A ‘low-effort family’ is defined not by conflict, but by avoidance,” psychiatrist Maryellen Eller told HuffPost. “Healthy relationships require mutual investment, respect, and accountability.”
She noted that we ideally learn all of these skills in childhood as we’re observing adults communicate openly, set boundaries and make up after conflict. But kids from low-effort families, she said, “may miss out on learning these critical skills because hard conversations and the rupture-repair process is avoided.”
Conflict is a normal part of being in a family, and those who don’t learn the skills to deal with disagreement may well end up avoiding most contact.
Maybe they’re unresponsive in general; maybe they simply bow out when the conversation starts to feel less-than-light. But when one or two people end up carrying the weight of maintaining the entire family relationship, the members who make less of an effort are still getting bids for connection without providing any in return.

skynesher via Getty Images
“Typically, there is a generational reason why families function this way,” Ayla Fleming, a licensed clinical social worker and family therapist who specialises in setting boundaries in difficult family situations, told HuffPost. “It can be related to insecurity, depression, lack of trust, discomfort with emotional expression, toxicity (for example, if certain members are narcissistic), or just plain anxiety.”
Whatever the root cause, the outcome ends up the same: These family members are unwilling or incapable of putting in the emotional energy required to sustain a connection.
Margaret Sigel is a licensed marriage and family therapist who specialises in developmental trauma/C-PTSD and family-of-origin dynamics. She told HuffPost that the “low effort” family is usually born from a family system where everyone subconsciously agreed to the unequal distribution of effort a long time ago.
“One person often becomes the relational infrastructure: the one who remembers birthdays, initiates plans, checks in, and follows through,” Sigel said. “It’s not so much that the rest of the family opted out of caring; it’s more that they never had to practice, because someone else was already doing it.”
But if everyone opted into this system long ago, when did it truly begin? Usually, Sigel explains, the person carrying 95% of the emotional labor learned as a child that connection required maintenance.
“Love wasn’t something you could trust to just exist. It had to be earned,” she said. “This relational template got installed early, often in a home where a parent was emotionally unavailable or overwhelmed, and the child stepped in to hold things together.”
In this way, the frustration you may be feeling as the only responsive family member on the group text is really just the tip of the iceberg. “Underneath,” Sigel explains, “it is often a much older and more vulnerable fear: If I stop doing this, will anyone come looking for me?”

Alex Potemkin via Getty Images
Signs you’re dealing with a low-effort family — or something else.
Fleming explains that you can usually tell if you’re dealing with a low-effort family by the overall pattern of time, energy and reciprocity in the relationships. “It often looks like one person doing 80–90% of the emotional labor in multiple areas: reaching out, making plans, initiating conversations, repairing conflict, and trying to hold the relationship together,” she said.
Because we often experience a cultural pressure to tolerate family dynamics no matter what – along with fear-based messaging that you’ll “regret” distancing yourself – Fleming advises not relying on friends or other family members to assess whether your family is low-effort.
Instead, “a Family Systems therapist can be especially helpful here,” she advises. “Family Systems therapists are typically more careful about this and understand how easily people can get triangulated into family dysfunction.”
It’s not so much that the rest of the family opted out of caring; it’s more that they never had to practice, because someone else was already doing it.
– Margaret Sigel, licensed marriage and family therapist
All of this said, don’t jump to conclusions about your family, either. “It’s important to distinguish normal differences in communication style from pathology,” Eller cautioned. “Not everyone needs or wants the same level of connection. However, when you notice a pattern of avoidance has become the default — especially around important or uncomfortable conversations – it may be a signal of a deeper relational pattern.”
What you can do to take care of yourself.
Just “do less!” right? Easier said than done. The most common advice to the overfunctioning family member (hello, fellow eldest daughters) is usually something like, “just stop doing so much,” Sigel said.
But while that’s legit enough advice, “it treats a nervous system pattern like it’s a conscious decision,” she said.
In reality, the person who has been overfunctioning has learned at such a deep level that relationships survive only through their own effort.
“Stepping back often activates real fear, not just discomfort,” Sigel added. In order to break the cycle, you’ll likely have to work through real grief when you stop initiating and discover just how little comes back to you in return.
The most important thing when navigating low-effort family dynamics is focusing on what you can control (i.e., not other people). “There is nothing you can do to force others to change, but you can always choose how you show up,” Eller said.

Vladimir Vladimirov via Getty Images
Here are five steps Sigel, Eller, and Fleming recommend to start caring for you and stop spinning your wheels trying to drum up a family connection from unwilling participants.
-
Self-regulate.
Eller advised learning skills to effectively handle your own emotions and how you show up in difficult moments — whether that’s breathing exercises, grounding techniques or brief relaxation strategies.
“Find what works for you,” Eller said, “and practice those skills often.” Taking good care of yourself, she said, will shape not only how you navigate difficult dynamics but the quality of relationships that you build moving forward.
-
Get clear on your values.
Fleming said to ask yourself a few questions to look inward and determine what truly matters to you in relationships. You might ask yourself:
- How do I want to show up in relationships that feel unequal?
- Do I want to try to match others’ level of effort? Will that be healthier for me? Could I stop initiating everything and see what happens? (They may change, or they may not — but at least I can stop feeling “stuck.”)
- Is it healthier for me to avoid investing deeply in relationships that feel one-sided? Will that help me feel less resentful, instead of trying to get others to do what they don’t want to do — or may be incapable of doing?
- Can I accept someone’s limitations while still having a relationship with them? What would that look like? Does it mean I have less contact with them — and that that’s OK?
-
Set — and hold — boundaries.
When you do engage with low-effort family members, “be clear on your goal and your boundaries,” Eller said. “Know what you need, what you’re willing to tolerate, and what will guide your next step if those boundaries aren’t respected.”
Sigel suggests starting with just one small boundary, such as not being the one to respond to the group text within minutes. “Let the discomfort teach you,” she urged.
Remember: Boundaries aren’t about controlling the other person; they’re about defining your own limits and deciding what you will do to protect your well-being.
That might look like:
- Limiting how often you initiate contact
- Stepping back from conversations that become one-sided
- Naming your needs clearly, even if they aren’t met
- Following through on consequences if your boundaries aren’t respected.
Take some space.
If you’re feeling overwhelmed, anxious, angry, depressed, or questioning your own reality, “it may be helpful to take some distance from the family,” Fleming said. “There may be larger forces at play that have nothing to do with you (like denial, anxiety or mental health struggles), and continuing to push against that can keep you stuck in the system and pull you away from your own growth.”
Allow for nuance.
This is a bit of a “do unto others” moment; if it feels like someone is icing you out, that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to treat them the same.
“A lack of connection doesn’t always mean bad people,” Eller said. “It may reflect a mismatch [in] emotional capacity or relationship style. This is one of the reasons why building support outside the nuclear family is valuable. You may be a wonderful child and have wonderful parents and you may still be emotionally mismatched.”
Fleming said folks with low-effort families often find themselves deciding between total estrangement vs. constant relationship maintenance. But “there is often a third option,” she said. “If we can use healthy distance, perhaps we can stop abandoning our needs long enough to have some peace.”
She reiterates that if you’re continuously trying to fix, explain or carry the relationship, you’re overfunctioning. “And over time, unbalanced relationships,” Fleming said, “can lead to burnout, resentment, and even physical and emotional symptoms.”
Perhaps the most difficult — and ultimately most freeing—reframe is accepting that not all relationships are meant to meet all your emotional needs. But acknowledging that mismatch doesn’t mean giving up; it means expanding your definition of support.
The good news? “Healthy relationships can be created, not just inherited,” Eller said.
Because healing often requires both acceptance and expansion: accepting what is, while also creating space for what you need. You can build relationships with chosen family. You can practice showing up with emotional vulnerability. You can model the kind of engagement you wish you’d received.
That doesn’t mean forcing your family to change. It means choosing new priorities and a different way of relating — one that includes accountability, communication and mutual effort. Because even if your family doesn’t meet you where you need them to, you can still meet yourself there. And you’d never act “low-effort” toward yourself, would you?
Politics
Celebrity Traitors Season 2 Cast: The Full Line-Up Has Been Unveiled
The line-up for the second season of The Celebrity Traitors has been revealed.
On Saturday morning, the 21 celebrities heading to TV’s most iconic castle were unveiled, ahead of filming getting underway.
However, there were a few surprises in the mix, too.
Joining them will be model Jerry Hall, TV presenter Maya Jama, former EastEnders star Ross Kemp and chart-topping musician James Blunt.
Which stars are on the line-up of The Celebrity Traitors season 2?
The full list of famous contestants is as follows:
- Amol Rajan
- Bella Ramsey
- James Acaster
- James Blunt
- Jerry Hall
- Joanne McNally
- Joe Lycett
- Julie Hesmondhalgh
- Kenny Oghenovo “King Kenny” Ojuederie
- Leigh-Anne Pinnock
- Maya Jama
- Michael Sheen
- Miranda hart
- Myha’a
- Professor Hannah Fry
- Richard E Grant
- Rob Beckett
- Romesh Ranganathan
- Ross Kemp
- Sebastian Croft
- Sharon Rooney
The Celebrity Traitors is expected to return to our screens for its second outing in October, with the fifth iteration of the regular show due to air in early 2027.
Earlier this year, it was confirmed that both The Traitors and its celebrity counterpart had been renewed by the BBC until at least 2030.
The CEO of production company Studio Lambert, Stephen Lambert, enthused at the time of the announcement: “The Traitors has become a genuine television phenomenon across the world, but especially in the UK, and we’re thrilled to continue the journey with the BBC.
“It’s hugely exciting that audiences will have many more years of strategy, suspense and shocking twists still to come.”
The first run of The Celebrity Traitors is in the running for three awards at the upcoming TV Baftas, including Best Reality Show, Best Entertainment Performance for its host Claudia Winkleman and the Memorable Moment prize for Alan Carr’s dramatic victory.
Politics
Farage’s Absence On Laura Kuenssberg Show Raises Eyebrows
Nigel Farage’s last-minute decision not to go on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg has caused a stir among his critics.
While introducing her panel, the presenter noted all the major parties had sent representatives into the network’s flagship Sunday show – aside from Reform UK.
“Nigel Farage – who, as we told you last week, was fixed to be here – but his team told us he changed his mind,” Kuenssberg said.
The programme aired four days before voters across the country head to the ballot box for local elections in England and devolved elections in Wales and Scotland.
Labour’s transport secretary Heidi Alexander, Green leader Zack Polanski and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch were all in attendance, as the parties are out on the campaign trail.
The programme was also promoting Farage’s appearance on the show only on Saturday.
Reform’s decision not to put up any party representative sparked significant speculation on social media.
Farage’s absence came days after the Guardian revealed the Reform leader was given £5 million by a crypto billionaire shortly before he chose to stand as an MP in June 2024, and won the Clacton seat in July.
Parliamentary rules state any benefit taken up to 12 months before getting into office must be registered, depending on whether it was for political or personal reasons.
The rules add: “If there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”
Reform told HuffPost UK Farage is “campaigning in Clacton this weekend instead” ahead of the local elections.
The party did not explain why a different Reform representative was not put up in his place.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Why we need more drunk MPs
The post Why we need more drunk MPs appeared first on spiked.
Politics
Keir Starmer’s boundless vanity – spiked
There is a peculiar kind of vanity that immunises its host against reality. Not the vain man who checks his reflection in shop windows, nor the narcissist who merely craves applause, but the man whose self-belief has calcified into something geological, impervious to rain, to wind, to the accumulated evidence of catastrophic misjudgement. Sir Keir Starmer is such a man.
Cast your mind back to Alec Guinness in The Man in the White Suit, that brilliant 1951 Ealing comedy in which a scientist invents an indestructible fabric and cannot understand why the world conspires to destroy him. He is not corrupt. He is not wicked. He simply cannot conceive that his invention might be the problem. Starmer inhabits precisely this world. Around him, the stains accumulate, the Lord Alli affair, the cronyism, the serial misjudgements of personnel, yet the suit, in his own estimation at least, remains spotless.
It was Jeremy Thorpe who skewered Harold Macmillan after the Night of the Long Knives in 1962, when a desperate prime minister sacked a third of his cabinet in a single afternoon to save his own skin. ‘Greater love hath no man than this’, Thorpe observed drily, ‘that he lay down his friends for his life’. The phrase has echoed across the decades as the definitive verdict on a certain kind of self-preserving leader. It fits Starmer with the precision of a bespoke suit – white, naturally, and apparently indestructible.
The past two weeks’ select committee evidence on the pressure Downing Street applied to civil servants to approve Peter Mandelson as US ambassador to is damning precisely because it is so legible. The prime minister told parliament one thing. The painstaking testimony tells us another. This is not a matter of interpretation or political spin – it is a question of whether the First Lord of the Treasury misled the House of Commons. In any previous era of British political life, such a charge would prompt at minimum a period of agonised contrition, possibly resignation. From Starmer, we receive serenity. He has told us on multiple occasions, with the earnest gravity of a man announcing a mathematical proof, that he is the only person qualified to lead Britain through its current difficulties. The evidence be damned.
This is not ordinary political resilience. Most politicians caught in a lie at least perform the theatre of accountability, the careful apology, the semi-withdrawal, the wounded dignity. Starmer skips the performance entirely. He speaks as if his own virtue is axiomatically beyond question. The trouble is that he appears to actually believe it.
Central to this delusion is his misreading of the July 2024 General Election. Starmer received one of the largest parliamentary majorities in modern British history and has apparently concluded that this was due to him, to his vision, his seriousness, his sheer qualification for office. This is a man mistaking the tide for his own swimming. That majority was not a monument built of his virtue. It was a thin-red veneer, a brittle carapace constructed from the rubble of Partygate, Truss, the slow decomposition of a Tory Party that had exhausted every ounce of public goodwill. The electorate did not choose Starmer – they evicted the Tories, and he happened to be standing in the hall. Any serious student of British political history, any of the senior figures who have served in governments that actually changed the national mood, could have told him this. Precedent, in fact, screams it.
Look at his appointments. The ministerial roster assembled with such confidence has proved a monument to misjudgement. The senior civil servants who have departed, some eased out, some broken on the wheel of Downing Street’s briefing operation, represent not a clearing of deadwood but a slaughter of institutional memory and independent voice. Macmillan at least understood he was gambling. Starmer does not appear to understand that he has made choices at all.
And so we ask the question that the opinion polls are already answering with brutal efficiency: is there a Labour praetorian guard capable of intervention? Some palace revolt of the sober and the serious that might rescue the party, and the country, from a premiership unravelling in slow motion? Walk the corridors of Westminster and you find not the suppressed fury of a parliamentary party coiling for action, but something more dispiriting: a grey, exhausted resignation, the shoulders-down quietism of people who have concluded that nothing they say will matter and that the risks of speaking outweigh any conceivable reward. MPs mutter privately. They do not act. They will not act. The culture that Starmer and his circle have cultivated in the parliamentary Labour Party is not one of candour and courage – it is one of servility, self-preservation and risk-aversion elevated to institutional religion. The praetorians have been domesticated into docility. They know the white suit is threadbare. They lack the nerve to say so aloud.
The polls tell their own story. The New Statesman‘s forecasting, drawing on Britain Elects data, is not merely bad for Labour, it is a portent of historical disgrace. The projection suggests Labour could fall from first to fifth in next week’s local elections, retaining just 616 council seats, a loss of around 1,941. Reform is forecast to triumph with over 1,500 seats, the Greens could surge past 1,000, and Labour, polling around 19 per cent nationally, looks unlikely to hold even a third of the seats it is defending. These are not the numbers of a party that has temporarily lost the room. These are the numbers of a party being dismantled ward by ward, borough by borough, in its own heartlands.
Will any of this dent the vanity? Here, one must be honest and reach for a pinch of salt. Starmer will note that expectations are low, that the results are ‘baked in’, that they reflect a ‘difficult inheritance’ from the last government, that the work of change takes time. He will find in the wreckage some green shoot, some London borough held against the odds, and declare the strategy vindicated.
The comparison with Liz Truss is instructive and, to Starmer’s supporters, ought to be sobering. Truss failed catastrophically, and she deserved her fate. But she failed while attempting something – a fiscal gamble that the markets destroyed in 45 days. She had, whatever else one says about her, the courage of her convictions.
What has Starmer risked for Britain? What has he staked his reputation on, beyond the preservation of his own reputation? The answer, surveying the wreckage of his first year, is: himself. The project is Starmer. The white suit must be kept clean. And if friends must be laid down for his life, if civil servants must be cast aside, if parliament must be misled, if the country must endure a government that governs for its own continuance rather than for any discernible national purpose, well, the suit remains white in his mirror, and that, it seems, is sufficient.
Macmillan, for all his faults, eventually understood when the game was up. The question is not whether the polls will tell Starmer the same thing. They already have, repeatedly and at volume. The question is whether a man who built a mountain out of another party’s failure, and called it his own genius, is constitutionally capable of reading them.
The white suit does not show any stains. That is precisely the problem.
Gawain Towler is a commentator and an elected board member of Reform UK. This is an edited version of an article that originally appeared on his Substack.
Politics
Minister Warns Starmer Rivals As Leadership Tensions Rise
A senior minister has torn into anyone considering challenging Keir Starmer’s leadership, saying rivals must “give their heads a gentle wobble”.
Labour is expected to take a beating when voters across the UK head to the ballot box for England’s local elections and devolved elections in Scotland and Wales.
According to widespread reports, senior Labour figures – including health secretary Wes Streeting, former deputy PM Angela Rayner and Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham – could be looking to topple Starmer if the party receives devastating results next week.
But Transport secretary Heidi Alexander stood by her boss on Sky News, urging challengers not to turn Labour into a “self-indulgent debating society”.
She said: “I think Keir is the best person to lead our country through the period of extreme international volatility that we are experiencing at the moment.
“I don’t think the public would thank us if the Labour Party turned into some sort of self-indulgent debating society when there are pockets of the world that feel like they are going to hell in a hand cart at the moment.”
She pointed to Starmer’s efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the major oil shipping lane which has been impacted by the US’s war in Iran.
“I think asking the prime minister to somehow reapply for his job while all of that is going on and he is entirely focused on the concerns of the British people would be the wrong thing to do,” Alexander said.
“I think those people who think we should have a leadership election now and repeat the mistakes that the Conservative government made in churning through prime ministers probably do need to give their head a gentle wobble at the moment.”
She claimed Starmer is “determined” to take what he has learned from the last two years in office and build a “stronger and fairer country for everyone”.
Asked if Alexander was sending that message to leadership rivals, she said: “This is about what the Labour Party needs to do to put the country first.
“We were elected in 2024 to deliver the change that the country was crying out for after Covid, Brexit, Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng and 14 years of Conservative government.”
“Change is going to take time,” she said, adding: “Does that mean we’re going to get a dopamine hit every couple of months? No it doesn’t. But does it mean we are going to put this country on the right path, yes, I do believe that.”
Alexander’s comments are striking considering other ministers started to distance themselves from Starmer over the Peter Mandelson scandal last month.
Work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden, questioned the prime minister’s judgment over the controversy.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband also admitted he and former foreign secretary David Lammy had both expressed concerns over Mandelson’s appointment before the ex-Labour peer became the UK’s ambassador to the US.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
TikTok On Grandparent Relationships With Grandkids Is Fuelling Debate
A TikTok video on how involved grandparents should be in their children’s lives – and whose responsibility it is that they forge a relationship – is fast dividing the internet
In a video which has been viewed over 2.5 million times, TikTok creator Helen, a retired police officer and “devoted granny” based in Devon, asked the internet: “Whose responsibility is it to maintain a relationship between a grandchild and their grandparents?”
Sharing her “strong views”, she revealed she thinks it’s always the grandparent’s responsibility to maintain the relationship and also be proactive with offering support.
“I think it’s the grandparent’s responsibility to always reach out, to be the one saying ‘well, can we help with this? Can we come and visit? Can we take them there? Is there anything you’d like me to do? Do you need some support this week? Do you need some support next week?’,” she explained.
“That’s what I do. I’m a devoted granny and I feel very strongly about this, and I don’t think kids should be the ones, your children should be the ones, that need to sort of facilitate that relationship. It’s up to the grandparents to do that.”
Whether it’s after-school care, a couple of days a week looking after tiny tots, or something even more substantial, plenty of grandparents are doing their bit – a SunLife survey from 2023 found more than half provided some form of childcare during the working week, giving up more than four hours a day on average.
But addressing those who might not have much to do with their grandkids because they plan on going on holiday or enjoying retirement, Helen continued: “And I think if grandparents are coming back with things like ‘well it’s our time now, it’s our time’… No, it’s not. It’s your time to help your kids, because it’s really difficult when your children are small and the help that you give them is so needed and it’s so appreciated …”
She ended: ”… It’s your time to be with your grandchildren and to help in every way you can – and I feel quite strongly about that.”
Her opinion split parents and grandparents down the middle
The post has resonated with a lot of parents. “How do I send this to my mom without sending this to my mom,” said one commenter.
“I’m so glad to hear someone say this,” added another. “My parents make very little effort and don’t reach out (but fake to the world they do) or see my children very often. I feel they should make the effort to maintain the relationship but sometimes wonder if I am wrong. So I am glad to see someone else shares my opinion.”
One parent even revealed: “My daughter’s grandmother says ‘she doesn’t contact me’. My daughter is 8.”
Even some grandparents were in agreement that the onus should be on grandparents to reach out and make the effort. “I’m the grandparent. I will always be the one to make the effort,” shared one commenter.
But others disagreed with Helen’s view. “I respectfully disagree… my kids are the grandkids’ parent therefore I think it’s important for my kids to control raising their kids,” said one grandparent. “My kids know I’m always there for backup but I never take control.”
Some noted that grandparents might still be working, which can pose challenges with how involved they can be: “Not all grandparents are retired with a healthy retirement fund! The longer the grandparents are needing to work – less time available for the grand[kids].”
Others suggested relationships are a two-way street, and it shouldn’t just be on grandparents to foster this relationship.
“Ok but hear me out,” said one respondent. “Me and my husband should also put in the effort to visit his parents and also my parents. It goes both ways.”
Politics
The House | Misunderstood, over interpreted, unrepresentative: How to read the local election results

5 min read
The internet will be teeming with hot takes as soon as the first declarations come in on Friday morning. To help you navigate a weekend of noise, here is a guide to what we can actually glean from the local election results.
If there is one thing most pollsters and analysts can agree on, it’s that the UK local election system is a bit of a mess. Some councils have all-outs, some go in thirds. Mayoral elections run on different cycles, and different parts of the country use different electoral systems and even have different electorates.
From an analysis perspective, it’s hard to think of a slipperier basis on which to take stock of the country as a whole. And yet, every May, this is what we are called to do. In the first 24 or 48 hours, the fog of poll descends, and political pronouncements are made on incomplete, unrepresentative or misinterpreted results. Given the Prime Minister’s difficult political situation, this is even more likely to be the case this year.
That being the case, there are a few points worth bearing in mind as we head into that chaotic post-election period. The idea is to guard against incomplete or premature arguments and to share what, from Persuasion’s extensive research, we already know that we know.
Remember, Reform started from a baseline of nothing
The relevant baseline for most of the elections happening this year is 2022. In 2022, Reform UK as a party barely existed (in England, it made a gain of precisely two seats). This is worth remembering when Reform starts clocking up lots of councillors early on in the night (areas more favourable to them report earlier on Friday morning). It’s almost certain they’ll gain thousands of seats as these wards, frozen in the mists of 2022, become updated to the politics of 2026.
The scale of Reform’s gains will be large but likely consistent with a party that has gone from a rounding error to a quarter of the national vote. This is far from irrelevant, of course, but it’s not new information – it’s there in the national polls, and it was there at last year’s locals. We learnt in 2025 that Reform’s post-2024 surge was real rather than a phantom of polling error.
For what it’s worth, if you really want to use councillor gains as a metric, respected local elections analyst Stephen Fisher judges that “Reform need more than +2270 net gains to really provide convincing evidence of the improvement that opinion polls suggest they have made since last year.”
Wait for the NEV
In time-honoured tradition, the best analysis will probably arrive too late – after a million terrible hot takes have already spawned. That said, it is worth waiting for it anyway.
The national equivalent vote share (NEV), or projected national vote share (PNS), will probably come on the Saturday or Sunday after polling day. This is a piece of analysis, usually from the BBC and Sky, that works out national vote shares implicit in the results, adjusting for the fact that not every area is holding elections. It is essentially the only clean basis on which you can extrapolate the results of the May elections to a wider national picture.
Using this, we’ll be able to more cleanly compare the directional movement of each party. The performance of Reform and of the Greens – two parties set to make gains mostly at the expense of Labour – will indicate whether their good national polling has legs. It’s also distinctly possible that, despite making significant net gains (and therefore being able to spin a narrative of a successful set of elections), they could underperform their polling.
Another thing to watch out for here is the Restore number. While Rupert Lowe’s party picking up a handful of seats will tell us little about their national viability, if they can clock anything here, that would be a cause of significant concern for Farage and co.
To make things messier, sometimes PNS and NEV differ slightly – and only cover local elections, not devolved elections happening simultaneously in Scotland and Wales. They also obviously can’t predict national elections held in three years. But with all those caveats, they’re still by far the best metrics we have.
Labour losing seats to Reform does not equate to Labour losing votes to Reform
Finally, there’s the risk of a more classic ecological fallacy as results come in. That is, if a party loses in one area and another party gains in the same, the assumption is that the losing party has lost because their voters have switched to the winning one. This will be true in some areas, but not in others.
It’s especially worth remembering when Labour loses wards to Reform. Previous Persuasion work has shown that even in areas where the Greens or Liberal Democrats are in no position to win, Labour has primarily been shedding votes to progressive parties rather than directly losing votes to Reform. Likewise, turnout matters hugely here – it’s very likely a lot of Labour voters will simply stay at home, while Reform and Green voters will be more motivated to turn out. This will account for a lot of seat movement, rather than direct switching.
Likewise, while geographic variations – Red Walls, Blue Walls, and so on – do matter, it’s important not to overstate them. Right now, Labour is getting creamed pretty evenly right across the country, just with different parties benefitting, directly or otherwise.
Steve Akehurst is the director of the polling and research organisation Persuasion UK
Politics
The Best Exercise For Stronger Shins And Calves
We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about “Japanese walking,” “incline walking”, “6-6-6 walking”, and “retro walking”.
But if you want to strengthen your calves and shins, either for running or just for better mobility, some experts, like physical therapist Dr Jo, reccomend “heel walking”.
In the caption of a YouTube video, they shared: “Walking on heels is a great exercise for helping with lower leg injuries and muscle imbalances. It can also help with ankle pain and plantar fasciitis.”
What are heel walks?
Happily, it doesn’t involve walking in high heels.
They’re performed by lifting your toes and the balls of your feet up and walking on a flat surface on your heels. You can go forward or backwards with your feet hip-width apart, physical therapist group Therapeutic Associates Inc shared.
They should be short, small steps. “The aim is to point your toes as much as you can towards the ceiling so there is as much dorsiflexion in the ankle as possible,” said Runna.
You should keep your upper body tall with your eyes looking straight forward. Tuck your elbows in and let your arms follow your leg movements.
Keep your glutes and hips tucked in.
Theraputic Associates Inc added, “you may want to perform this exercise to fatigue as in, you can’t keep your toes up off the ground anymore and exhaust the shin muscles”.
What are the benefits of heel walks?
Runna explained that, “Heel walks are a very simple but effective warm-up exercise for the muscle that runs along the front of the shin bone (tibialis anterior).”
This is responsible for keeping your feet lifted and preventing a condition called “foot drop”. Calling it an “underappreciated muscle,” Mirafit added that a strong tibialis anterior contributes to healthy movements of the lower leg which are “all essential when it comes to everyday life and specifically when walking and hiking.”
It may help to prevent shin splints, increase your balance and mobility, and reduce your risk of overuse injuries because they make you better at absorbing shocks, they continued.
Heel walks also stretch your calf muscles and strengthen the flexors in your foot, Runna said.
-
Tech6 days agoRegister Renaming | Hackaday
-
Politics6 days agoDrax board avoid their own AGM, accused of greenwashing & environmental racism
-
Tech6 days agoWhy Blue Badges Disappeared From Toyota Hybrids
-
Tech6 days agoImages of Samsung’s rumored smart glasses have leaked
-
Sports7 days agoIPL 2026: Ruturaj Gaikwad registers slowest fifty of the season, enters all-time unwanted list | Cricket News
-
Tech2 days agoTrump’s 25% EU auto tariff breaches Turnberry Agreement that also covers semiconductors and digital trade
-
Fashion4 days agoKylie Jenner’s KHY Enters a New Era with ‘Born in LA’
-
Business4 days agoMost Commercial Energy Audits Miss the Real Losses
-
Crypto World5 days agoCFTC’s AI will review U.S. crypto registration applications, chairman tells CoinDesk
-
Business6 days ago(VIDEO) Charlize Theron Climbs Times Square Billboard to Promote New Netflix Thriller ‘Apex’
-
Business4 days agoBarclay Brothers Avoid Bankruptcy: HSBC Drops High Court Petitions After IVA Deal
-
Sports2 days agoPaul Scholes issues Marcus Rashford reality check as agreement emerges over Man United star
-
Entertainment6 days agoAlicia Keys Calls Out Music Industry ‘Boys Club’
-
Business4 days agoTesla Officially Registers Elon Musk’s Stock: What Investors Need to Know
-
Tech5 days agoGet Ready for More Brain-Scanning Consumer Gadgets
-
Tech7 days agoDyson Vacuums And The Curse Of Cooked Capacitors
-
Crypto World5 days agoRobinhood Phishing Scam Exploits Gmail Dot Feature to Bypass Security
-
Crypto World7 days agoOnly 3% of traders drive Polymarket’s accuracy, not the crowd, study finds
-
Entertainment6 days agoSister Wives: Janelle Posts New Scary Warning
-
Crypto World5 days agoGmail Dot Trick Underpins Robinhood Phishing, Sending Real-Looking Emails

You must be logged in to post a comment Login