Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Minister Warns Starmer Rivals As Leadership Tensions Rise

Published

on

Minister Warns Starmer Rivals As Leadership Tensions Rise

A senior minister has torn into anyone considering challenging Keir Starmer’s leadership, saying rivals must “give their heads a gentle wobble”.

Labour is expected to take a beating when voters across the UK head to the ballot box for England’s local elections and devolved elections in Scotland and Wales.

According to widespread reports, senior Labour figures – including health secretary Wes Streeting, former deputy PM Angela Rayner and Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham – could be looking to topple Starmer if the party receives devastating results next week.

But Transport secretary Heidi Alexander stood by her boss on Sky News, urging challengers not to turn Labour into a “self-indulgent debating society”.

Advertisement

She said: “I think Keir is the best person to lead our country through the period of extreme international volatility that we are experiencing at the moment.

“I don’t think the public would thank us if the Labour Party turned into some sort of self-indulgent debating society when there are pockets of the world that feel like they are going to hell in a hand cart at the moment.”

She pointed to Starmer’s efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the major oil shipping lane which has been impacted by the US’s war in Iran.

“I think asking the prime minister to somehow reapply for his job while all of that is going on and he is entirely focused on the concerns of the British people would be the wrong thing to do,” Alexander said.

Advertisement

“I think those people who think we should have a leadership election now and repeat the mistakes that the Conservative government made in churning through prime ministers probably do need to give their head a gentle wobble at the moment.”

She claimed Starmer is “determined” to take what he has learned from the last two years in office and build a “stronger and fairer country for everyone”.

Asked if Alexander was sending that message to leadership rivals, she said: “This is about what the Labour Party needs to do to put the country first.

“We were elected in 2024 to deliver the change that the country was crying out for after Covid, Brexit, Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng and 14 years of Conservative government.”

Advertisement

“Change is going to take time,” she said, adding: “Does that mean we’re going to get a dopamine hit every couple of months? No it doesn’t. But does it mean we are going to put this country on the right path, yes, I do believe that.”

Alexander’s comments are striking considering other ministers started to distance themselves from Starmer over the Peter Mandelson scandal last month.

Work and pensions secretary Pat McFadden, questioned the prime minister’s judgment over the controversy.

Energy secretary Ed Miliband also admitted he and former foreign secretary David Lammy had both expressed concerns over Mandelson’s appointment before the ex-Labour peer became the UK’s ambassador to the US.

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

How To Deal With An Angry Person

Published

on

How To Deal With An Angry Person

The last thing that most of us want to deal with is an angry person in our face. But chances are, sooner or later, it’s going to happen.

So what do we do? And, maybe more importantly, what shouldn’t we do?

Those are some of the questions that Raj Punjabi and Noah Michelson, the co-hosts of HuffPost’s “Am I Doing It Wrong?” podcast, recently posed to Ryan Martin, better know as the Anger Professor, to find out how to “do anger better.”

“You had a great tweet,” Michelson said during the conversation. “You said something like, ‘Never in the history of “calm downs’ has ‘calm down’ calmed down someone.’ So I’m guessing ‘calm down’ is not the thing you want to say.”

Advertisement

“I think ‘relax’ is even worse,” Punjabi added.

“No, ‘relax’ has never relaxed anyone,” agreed Martin, a psychology professor and an associate dean for the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay.

“This is a case where … people are elevated and they’re not necessarily thinking as rationally, and they’re a little defensive. You’re not going to make as much progress with those sort of direct statements that you want to make,” he added. “Telling people to do things like ‘just breathe’ aren’t going to have much of an impact.”

Instead, modelling those actions yourself is going to be more effective.

Advertisement

“One of the things I think is funny is that often when people tell someone to ‘calm down,’ they yell it or they say it in a very loud, stern voice,” said Martin, the author of How To Deal With Angry People and Why We Get Mad: How To Use Your Anger for Positive Change.

“But if you actually back up a little bit and you start speaking softer than normal, you start to communicate in a little more gentle tone, people will sort of inherently match that. This also is rooted in our evolutionary history, that we tend to match the people around us in tone.”

This can help take the edge off the situation without using those triggering phrases, which tend to make us even more irritated.

“It’s, frankly, manipulative. … You’re actually decreasing that elevation,” Martin said. “So speaking in that more gentle voice, staying calm yourself, finding ways to ultimately, if they’re venting, [offer] some minimal encouragers to let them get through that.”

Advertisement

Once there’s less intensity, you’re more likely to have an opportunity to respond.

“I don’t think you want to agree with someone if you don’t agree with them,” said Martin. “But if you can frame a response that seems validating, to let them know ‘you’re obviously really upset about this, let’s talk through some solutions together’ — ways that you can validate their feelings without necessarily validating the cause of their feelings.”

We also discussed the three questions that you should ask yourself before you get angry, what you should do before you send an angry email, and much more.

For more from Ryan Martin, visit his website and Instagram.

Advertisement

Need some help with something you’ve been doing wrong? Email us at AmIDoingItWrong@HuffPost.com, and we might investigate the topic in an upcoming episode.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Experts Say Hotel Elevators Are The Germiest Spot In Any Hotel

Published

on

You will likely touch a first-floor elevator to get out of a hotel lobby, and it's a common place for people to spread germs.

When you check into your hotel stay, you are expecting to start your vacation ― but it could also be where you start spreading germs and diseases.

That’s because hotels are full of high-touch surface areas that many people will regularly touch with a number of different unclean hands.

The problem is that you cannot trust your fellow travellers to practice good hand hygiene. “People just simply aren’t washing their hands properly in the first place, and then they’re washing them even less properly when they’re on vacation,” said microbiologist Jason Tetro aka “The Germ Guy,” citing faecal bacteria and Staphylococcus bacteria as two easily spreadable germs to watch out for.

“If you come into contact with any bacteria or virus, you pretty much have about a four-hour risk of getting exposed to it, if you happen to touch your face or put your fingers in your mouth,” Tetro explained.

Advertisement

And out of all the high-touch surfaces in a hotel, germ experts warn that elevator buttons for the first floor can be the biggest overlooked culprit.

You will likely touch a first-floor elevator to get out of a hotel lobby, and it's a common place for people to spread germs.

Jackyenjoyphotography via Getty Images

You will likely touch a first-floor elevator to get out of a hotel lobby, and it’s a common place for people to spread germs.

“Everybody touches the first floor [elevator button] to get out,” said Chuck Gerba, a microbiologist at the University of Arizona. “I have to knuckle elevator buttons these days, because we’ve sampled enough of them.”

When Mary Spitzer was a researcher at the Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health at the University of Arizona, she led a study where she evaluated viral spread and infection risks in a hotel lobby and found that first-floor elevator buttons were the most frequently touched fomite, or object that helps transmit infectious diseases.

As part of this, she sat in a lobby and noted what surfaces were being touched by what people and in what order. “Pretty consistently, it’d be hotel button first, obviously, because they’re coming down into the lobby,” Spitzer said.

Advertisement

People don’t typically touch an elevator button for long, but even a quick press has spread potential, because viruses can stay alive for hours or days. Tetro said that flu and COVID viruses could live on elevator button surfaces for four to eight hours, for example.

Once someone coughs and sneezes onto an elevator button, just you pressing that button “for that very short period of time is enough for you to pick up enough virus from that residue that’s been there,” Tetro said.

Beyond hotel elevators, Tetro warned that other high-touch surface areas in hotels like doorknobs, remote controls, light switches, alarm clocks, telephones, and ice buckets in particular can be full of germs “because they probably never get washed or disinfected.”

The good news is that one simple solution for hotels is to clean high-touch surface areas more purposefully. In Spitzer’s study, targeted cleaning on high-touch surface areas like refrigerator handles and credit card readers led to a significant reduction in viral load.

Advertisement

And you can always take matters into your own hands ― pun intended ― by practicing good health hygiene.

When in doubt, wash your hands or immediately use hand sanitiser when you are using a communal hotel space. “Touching things is sort of unavoidable” in hotels, Spitzer said. After you touch that elevator button, “be mindful of where you’re then putting your hands,” Spitzer suggested. “Are you touching your face? Are you touching your kid’s face? Are you eating things?”

This way, your vacation doesn’t end sooner than it has to because you got yourself sick.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

These Red Flags Are Signs You Have A ‘Low Effort’ Family

Published

on

Feeling ignored or like your emotional energy is not being matched by your nearest and dearest can weigh on you.

Have you ever checked the family group text, days after you shared something important/impressive/timely/hilarious/heartfelt, only to realise everyone’s response was… crickets?

If this is a constant in your communications, you may be dealing with a “low-effort family” – a type of often-invisible family dysfunction.

Low-effort families can fly under the radar because there are no yelling matches, explosive fights or even obvious conflict. From the outside, things might look great – even calmer than the average family.

But if, beneath the surface, there’s one person doing 95% of the emotional heavy lifting for a family of four (or an extended family of 15), something is definitely amiss.

Advertisement

Here’s what the experts say about this family dynamic – and how to cope in healthy ways (that aren’t just continuing to blow up the group chat).

What is a low-effort family?

“A ‘low-effort family’ is defined not by conflict, but by avoidance,” psychiatrist Maryellen Eller told HuffPost. “Healthy relationships require mutual investment, respect, and accountability.”

She noted that we ideally learn all of these skills in childhood as we’re observing adults communicate openly, set boundaries and make up after conflict. But kids from low-effort families, she said, “may miss out on learning these critical skills because hard conversations and the rupture-repair process is avoided.”

Advertisement

Conflict is a normal part of being in a family, and those who don’t learn the skills to deal with disagreement may well end up avoiding most contact.

Maybe they’re unresponsive in general; maybe they simply bow out when the conversation starts to feel less-than-light. But when one or two people end up carrying the weight of maintaining the entire family relationship, the members who make less of an effort are still getting bids for connection without providing any in return.

Feeling ignored or like your emotional energy is not being matched by your nearest and dearest can weigh on you.

skynesher via Getty Images

Feeling ignored or like your emotional energy is not being matched by your nearest and dearest can weigh on you.

Whatever the root cause, the outcome ends up the same: These family members are unwilling or incapable of putting in the emotional energy required to sustain a connection.

Advertisement

Margaret Sigel is a licensed marriage and family therapist who specialises in developmental trauma/C-PTSD and family-of-origin dynamics. She told HuffPost that the “low effort” family is usually born from a family system where everyone subconsciously agreed to the unequal distribution of effort a long time ago.

“One person often becomes the relational infrastructure: the one who remembers birthdays, initiates plans, checks in, and follows through,” Sigel said. “It’s not so much that the rest of the family opted out of caring; it’s more that they never had to practice, because someone else was already doing it.”

But if everyone opted into this system long ago, when did it truly begin? Usually, Sigel explains, the person carrying 95% of the emotional labor learned as a child that connection required maintenance.

“Love wasn’t something you could trust to just exist. It had to be earned,” she said. “This relational template got installed early, often in a home where a parent was emotionally unavailable or overwhelmed, and the child stepped in to hold things together.”

Advertisement

In this way, the frustration you may be feeling as the only responsive family member on the group text is really just the tip of the iceberg. “Underneath,” Sigel explains, “it is often a much older and more vulnerable fear: If I stop doing this, will anyone come looking for me?

Conflict is a normal part of being in a family, and those who don’t learn the skills to deal with disagreement may well end up avoiding most contact.

Alex Potemkin via Getty Images

Conflict is a normal part of being in a family, and those who don’t learn the skills to deal with disagreement may well end up avoiding most contact.

Signs you’re dealing with a low-effort family — or something else.

Fleming explains that you can usually tell if you’re dealing with a low-effort family by the overall pattern of time, energy and reciprocity in the relationships. “It often looks like one person doing 80–90% of the emotional labor in multiple areas: reaching out, making plans, initiating conversations, repairing conflict, and trying to hold the relationship together,” she said.

Because we often experience a cultural pressure to tolerate family dynamics no matter what – along with fear-based messaging that you’ll “regret” distancing yourself – Fleming advises not relying on friends or other family members to assess whether your family is low-effort.

Advertisement

Instead, “a Family Systems therapist can be especially helpful here,” she advises. “Family Systems therapists are typically more careful about this and understand how easily people can get triangulated into family dysfunction.”

It’s not so much that the rest of the family opted out of caring; it’s more that they never had to practice, because someone else was already doing it.

– Margaret Sigel, licensed marriage and family therapist

All of this said, don’t jump to conclusions about your family, either. “It’s important to distinguish normal differences in communication style from pathology,” Eller cautioned. “Not everyone needs or wants the same level of connection. However, when you notice a pattern of avoidance has become the default — especially around important or uncomfortable conversations – it may be a signal of a deeper relational pattern.”

Advertisement

What you can do to take care of yourself.

Just “do less!” right? Easier said than done. The most common advice to the overfunctioning family member (hello, fellow eldest daughters) is usually something like, “just stop doing so much,” Sigel said.

But while that’s legit enough advice, “it treats a nervous system pattern like it’s a conscious decision,” she said.

In reality, the person who has been overfunctioning has learned at such a deep level that relationships survive only through their own effort.

Advertisement

“Stepping back often activates real fear, not just discomfort,” Sigel added. In order to break the cycle, you’ll likely have to work through real grief when you stop initiating and discover just how little comes back to you in return.

The most important thing when navigating low-effort family dynamics is focusing on what you can control (i.e., not other people). “There is nothing you can do to force others to change, but you can always choose how you show up,” Eller said.

For high-effort counterparts of a low-effort family, it can be unbelievably hard to break the cycle of "overfunctioning."

Vladimir Vladimirov via Getty Images

For high-effort counterparts of a low-effort family, it can be unbelievably hard to break the cycle of “overfunctioning.”

Here are five steps Sigel, Eller, and Fleming recommend to start caring for you and stop spinning your wheels trying to drum up a family connection from unwilling participants.

  1. Self-regulate.

    Eller advised learning skills to effectively handle your own emotions and how you show up in difficult moments — whether that’s breathing exercises, grounding techniques or brief relaxation strategies.

    “Find what works for you,” Eller said, “and practice those skills often.” Taking good care of yourself, she said, will shape not only how you navigate difficult dynamics but the quality of relationships that you build moving forward.

    Advertisement
  2. Get clear on your values.

    Fleming said to ask yourself a few questions to look inward and determine what truly matters to you in relationships. You might ask yourself:

    • How do I want to show up in relationships that feel unequal?
    • Do I want to try to match others’ level of effort? Will that be healthier for me? Could I stop initiating everything and see what happens? (They may change, or they may not — but at least I can stop feeling “stuck.”)
    • Is it healthier for me to avoid investing deeply in relationships that feel one-sided? Will that help me feel less resentful, instead of trying to get others to do what they don’t want to do — or may be incapable of doing?
    • Can I accept someone’s limitations while still having a relationship with them? What would that look like? Does it mean I have less contact with them — and that that’s OK?
  3. Set — and hold — boundaries.

    When you do engage with low-effort family members, “be clear on your goal and your boundaries,” Eller said. “Know what you need, what you’re willing to tolerate, and what will guide your next step if those boundaries aren’t respected.”

    Sigel suggests starting with just one small boundary, such as not being the one to respond to the group text within minutes. “Let the discomfort teach you,” she urged.

    Remember: Boundaries aren’t about controlling the other person; they’re about defining your own limits and deciding what you will do to protect your well-being.

    That might look like:

  • Limiting how often you initiate contact
  • Stepping back from conversations that become one-sided
  • Naming your needs clearly, even if they aren’t met
  • Following through on consequences if your boundaries aren’t respected.
  • Take some space.

    If you’re feeling overwhelmed, anxious, angry, depressed, or questioning your own reality, “it may be helpful to take some distance from the family,” Fleming said. “There may be larger forces at play that have nothing to do with you (like denial, anxiety or mental health struggles), and continuing to push against that can keep you stuck in the system and pull you away from your own growth.”

  • Allow for nuance.

    This is a bit of a “do unto others” moment; if it feels like someone is icing you out, that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to treat them the same.

    “A lack of connection doesn’t always mean bad people,” Eller said. “It may reflect a mismatch [in] emotional capacity or relationship style. This is one of the reasons why building support outside the nuclear family is valuable. You may be a wonderful child and have wonderful parents and you may still be emotionally mismatched.”

  • Fleming said folks with low-effort families often find themselves deciding between total estrangement vs. constant relationship maintenance. But “there is often a third option,” she said. “If we can use healthy distance, perhaps we can stop abandoning our needs long enough to have some peace.”

    Advertisement

    She reiterates that if you’re continuously trying to fix, explain or carry the relationship, you’re overfunctioning. “And over time, unbalanced relationships,” Fleming said, “can lead to burnout, resentment, and even physical and emotional symptoms.”

    Perhaps the most difficult — and ultimately most freeing—reframe is accepting that not all relationships are meant to meet all your emotional needs. But acknowledging that mismatch doesn’t mean giving up; it means expanding your definition of support.

    The good news? “Healthy relationships can be created, not just inherited,” Eller said.

    Because healing often requires both acceptance and expansion: accepting what is, while also creating space for what you need. You can build relationships with chosen family. You can practice showing up with emotional vulnerability. You can model the kind of engagement you wish you’d received.

    Advertisement

    That doesn’t mean forcing your family to change. It means choosing new priorities and a different way of relating — one that includes accountability, communication and mutual effort. Because even if your family doesn’t meet you where you need them to, you can still meet yourself there. And you’d never act “low-effort” toward yourself, would you?

    Source link

    Advertisement
    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Celebrity Traitors Season 2 Cast: The Full Line-Up Has Been Unveiled

    Published

    on

    Celebrity Traitors Season 2 Cast: The Full Line-Up Has Been Unveiled

    The line-up for the second season of The Celebrity Traitors has been revealed.

    On Saturday morning, the 21 celebrities heading to TV’s most iconic castle were unveiled, ahead of filming getting underway.

    However, there were a few surprises in the mix, too.

    Joining them will be model Jerry Hall, TV presenter Maya Jama, former EastEnders star Ross Kemp and chart-topping musician James Blunt.

    Advertisement

    Which stars are on the line-up of The Celebrity Traitors season 2?

    The full list of famous contestants is as follows:

    • Amol Rajan
    • Bella Ramsey
    • James Acaster
    • James Blunt
    • Jerry Hall
    • Joanne McNally
    • Joe Lycett
    • Julie Hesmondhalgh
    • Kenny Oghenovo “King Kenny” Ojuederie
    • Leigh-Anne Pinnock
    • Maya Jama
    • Michael Sheen
    • Miranda hart
    • Myha’a
    • Professor Hannah Fry
    • Richard E Grant
    • Rob Beckett
    • Romesh Ranganathan
    • Ross Kemp
    • Sebastian Croft
    • Sharon Rooney

    The Celebrity Traitors is expected to return to our screens for its second outing in October, with the fifth iteration of the regular show due to air in early 2027.

    Earlier this year, it was confirmed that both The Traitors and its celebrity counterpart had been renewed by the BBC until at least 2030.

    The CEO of production company Studio Lambert, Stephen Lambert, enthused at the time of the announcement: “The Traitors has become a genuine television phenomenon across the world, but especially in the UK, and we’re thrilled to continue the journey with the BBC.

    Advertisement

    “It’s hugely exciting that audiences will have many more years of strategy, suspense and shocking twists still to come.”

    The first run of The Celebrity Traitors is in the running for three awards at the upcoming TV Baftas, including Best Reality Show, Best Entertainment Performance for its host Claudia Winkleman and the Memorable Moment prize for Alan Carr’s dramatic victory.

    Source link

    Advertisement
    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Farage’s Absence On Laura Kuenssberg Show Raises Eyebrows

    Published

    on

    Farage's Absence On Laura Kuenssberg Show Raises Eyebrows

    Nigel Farage’s last-minute decision not to go on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg has caused a stir among his critics.

    While introducing her panel, the presenter noted all the major parties had sent representatives into the network’s flagship Sunday show – aside from Reform UK.

    “Nigel Farage – who, as we told you last week, was fixed to be here – but his team told us he changed his mind,” Kuenssberg said.

    The programme aired four days before voters across the country head to the ballot box for local elections in England and devolved elections in Wales and Scotland.

    Advertisement

    Labour’s transport secretary Heidi Alexander, Green leader Zack Polanski and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch were all in attendance, as the parties are out on the campaign trail.

    The programme was also promoting Farage’s appearance on the show only on Saturday.

    Reform’s decision not to put up any party representative sparked significant speculation on social media.

    Farage’s absence came days after the Guardian revealed the Reform leader was given £5 million by a crypto billionaire shortly before he chose to stand as an MP in June 2024, and won the Clacton seat in July.

    Advertisement

    Parliamentary rules state any benefit taken up to 12 months before getting into office must be registered, depending on whether it was for political or personal reasons.

    The rules add: “If there is any doubt, the benefit should be registered.”

    Reform told HuffPost UK Farage is “campaigning in Clacton this weekend instead” ahead of the local elections.

    The party did not explain why a different Reform representative was not put up in his place.

    Advertisement

    Laura Kuenssberg, “Nigel Farage was set to be here, but he he changed his mind”

    Does that have anything to do with his undeclared £5,000,000 gift? pic.twitter.com/58MwInAy4h

    — Farrukh (@implausibleblog) May 3, 2026

    Nigel Farage is frit. Who knew? #bbclaurak

    — Glen Mitchell 🇺🇦 🐝 🌹🌈 (@GlenMitchell1) May 3, 2026

    Nigel Farage didn’t turn up folks.
    Knew his story wouldn’t stack up over the £5million gift he received.
    Knew he would be exposed nationally as the fraud he is and couldn’t risk losing votes before May 7th
    Guess who did turn up? @ZackPolanski pic.twitter.com/6TnHHIDuia

    — Narinder Kaur (@narindertweets) May 3, 2026

    Advertisement

    🚨 Laura Kuenssberg introducing today’s political guests: “Not, however, Nigel Farage who as we told you last week was fixed to be here – his team told us, he’s changed his mind” pic.twitter.com/Oo9o5bmQPS

    — The Daily Britain (@dailybritainonx) May 3, 2026

    Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

    Source link

    Advertisement
    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Why we need more drunk MPs

    Published

    on

    Why we need more drunk MPs

    The post Why we need more drunk MPs appeared first on spiked.

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Politics

    Keir Starmer’s boundless vanity – spiked

    Published

    on

    Keir Starmer’s boundless vanity

    There is a peculiar kind of vanity that immunises its host against reality. Not the vain man who checks his reflection in shop windows, nor the narcissist who merely craves applause, but the man whose self-belief has calcified into something geological, impervious to rain, to wind, to the accumulated evidence of catastrophic misjudgement. Sir Keir Starmer is such a man.

    Cast your mind back to Alec Guinness in The Man in the White Suit, that brilliant 1951 Ealing comedy in which a scientist invents an indestructible fabric and cannot understand why the world conspires to destroy him. He is not corrupt. He is not wicked. He simply cannot conceive that his invention might be the problem. Starmer inhabits precisely this world. Around him, the stains accumulate, the Lord Alli affair, the cronyism, the serial misjudgements of personnel, yet the suit, in his own estimation at least, remains spotless.

    It was Jeremy Thorpe who skewered Harold Macmillan after the Night of the Long Knives in 1962, when a desperate prime minister sacked a third of his cabinet in a single afternoon to save his own skin. ‘Greater love hath no man than this’, Thorpe observed drily, ‘that he lay down his friends for his life’. The phrase has echoed across the decades as the definitive verdict on a certain kind of self-preserving leader. It fits Starmer with the precision of a bespoke suit – white, naturally, and apparently indestructible.

    Advertisement

    The past two weeks’ select committee evidence on the pressure Downing Street applied to civil servants to approve Peter Mandelson as US ambassador to is damning precisely because it is so legible. The prime minister told parliament one thing. The painstaking testimony tells us another. This is not a matter of interpretation or political spin – it is a question of whether the First Lord of the Treasury misled the House of Commons. In any previous era of British political life, such a charge would prompt at minimum a period of agonised contrition, possibly resignation. From Starmer, we receive serenity. He has told us on multiple occasions, with the earnest gravity of a man announcing a mathematical proof, that he is the only person qualified to lead Britain through its current difficulties. The evidence be damned.

    This is not ordinary political resilience. Most politicians caught in a lie at least perform the theatre of accountability, the careful apology, the semi-withdrawal, the wounded dignity. Starmer skips the performance entirely. He speaks as if his own virtue is axiomatically beyond question. The trouble is that he appears to actually believe it.

    Advertisement

    Enjoying spiked?

    Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

    We are funded by you. Thank you!

    Advertisement




    Please wait…

    Advertisement
    Advertisement

    Central to this delusion is his misreading of the July 2024 General Election. Starmer received one of the largest parliamentary majorities in modern British history and has apparently concluded that this was due to him, to his vision, his seriousness, his sheer qualification for office. This is a man mistaking the tide for his own swimming. That majority was not a monument built of his virtue. It was a thin-red veneer, a brittle carapace constructed from the rubble of Partygate, Truss, the slow decomposition of a Tory Party that had exhausted every ounce of public goodwill. The electorate did not choose Starmer – they evicted the Tories, and he happened to be standing in the hall. Any serious student of British political history, any of the senior figures who have served in governments that actually changed the national mood, could have told him this. Precedent, in fact, screams it.

    Look at his appointments. The ministerial roster assembled with such confidence has proved a monument to misjudgement. The senior civil servants who have departed, some eased out, some broken on the wheel of Downing Street’s briefing operation, represent not a clearing of deadwood but a slaughter of institutional memory and independent voice. Macmillan at least understood he was gambling. Starmer does not appear to understand that he has made choices at all.

    Advertisement

    And so we ask the question that the opinion polls are already answering with brutal efficiency: is there a Labour praetorian guard capable of intervention? Some palace revolt of the sober and the serious that might rescue the party, and the country, from a premiership unravelling in slow motion? Walk the corridors of Westminster and you find not the suppressed fury of a parliamentary party coiling for action, but something more dispiriting: a grey, exhausted resignation, the shoulders-down quietism of people who have concluded that nothing they say will matter and that the risks of speaking outweigh any conceivable reward. MPs mutter privately. They do not act. They will not act. The culture that Starmer and his circle have cultivated in the parliamentary Labour Party is not one of candour and courage – it is one of servility, self-preservation and risk-aversion elevated to institutional religion. The praetorians have been domesticated into docility. They know the white suit is threadbare. They lack the nerve to say so aloud.

    The polls tell their own story. The New Statesman‘s forecasting, drawing on Britain Elects data, is not merely bad for Labour, it is a portent of historical disgrace. The projection suggests Labour could fall from first to fifth in next week’s local elections, retaining just 616 council seats, a loss of around 1,941. Reform is forecast to triumph with over 1,500 seats, the Greens could surge past 1,000, and Labour, polling around 19 per cent nationally, looks unlikely to hold even a third of the seats it is defending. These are not the numbers of a party that has temporarily lost the room. These are the numbers of a party being dismantled ward by ward, borough by borough, in its own heartlands.

    Will any of this dent the vanity? Here, one must be honest and reach for a pinch of salt. Starmer will note that expectations are low, that the results are ‘baked in’, that they reflect a ‘difficult inheritance’ from the last government, that the work of change takes time. He will find in the wreckage some green shoot, some London borough held against the odds, and declare the strategy vindicated.

    Advertisement

    The comparison with Liz Truss is instructive and, to Starmer’s supporters, ought to be sobering. Truss failed catastrophically, and she deserved her fate. But she failed while attempting something – a fiscal gamble that the markets destroyed in 45 days. She had, whatever else one says about her, the courage of her convictions.

    What has Starmer risked for Britain? What has he staked his reputation on, beyond the preservation of his own reputation? The answer, surveying the wreckage of his first year, is: himself. The project is Starmer. The white suit must be kept clean. And if friends must be laid down for his life, if civil servants must be cast aside, if parliament must be misled, if the country must endure a government that governs for its own continuance rather than for any discernible national purpose, well, the suit remains white in his mirror, and that, it seems, is sufficient.

    Macmillan, for all his faults, eventually understood when the game was up. The question is not whether the polls will tell Starmer the same thing. They already have, repeatedly and at volume. The question is whether a man who built a mountain out of another party’s failure, and called it his own genius, is constitutionally capable of reading them.

    Advertisement

    The white suit does not show any stains. That is precisely the problem.

    Gawain Towler is a commentator and an elected board member of Reform UK. This is an edited version of an article that originally appeared on his Substack.

    Advertisement

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Politics

    TikTok On Grandparent Relationships With Grandkids Is Fuelling Debate

    Published

    on

    TikTok On Grandparent Relationships With Grandkids Is Fuelling Debate

    A TikTok video on how involved grandparents should be in their children’s lives – and whose responsibility it is that they forge a relationship – is fast dividing the internet

    In a video which has been viewed over 2.5 million times, TikTok creator Helen, a retired police officer and “devoted granny” based in Devon, asked the internet: “Whose responsibility is it to maintain a relationship between a grandchild and their grandparents?”

    Sharing her “strong views”, she revealed she thinks it’s always the grandparent’s responsibility to maintain the relationship and also be proactive with offering support.

    “I think it’s the grandparent’s responsibility to always reach out, to be the one saying ‘well, can we help with this? Can we come and visit? Can we take them there? Is there anything you’d like me to do? Do you need some support this week? Do you need some support next week?’,” she explained.

    Advertisement

    “That’s what I do. I’m a devoted granny and I feel very strongly about this, and I don’t think kids should be the ones, your children should be the ones, that need to sort of facilitate that relationship. It’s up to the grandparents to do that.”

    Whether it’s after-school care, a couple of days a week looking after tiny tots, or something even more substantial, plenty of grandparents are doing their bit – a SunLife survey from 2023 found more than half provided some form of childcare during the working week, giving up more than four hours a day on average.

    But addressing those who might not have much to do with their grandkids because they plan on going on holiday or enjoying retirement, Helen continued: “And I think if grandparents are coming back with things like ‘well it’s our time now, it’s our time’… No, it’s not. It’s your time to help your kids, because it’s really difficult when your children are small and the help that you give them is so needed and it’s so appreciated …”

    She ended: ”… It’s your time to be with your grandchildren and to help in every way you can – and I feel quite strongly about that.”

    Advertisement

    Her opinion split parents and grandparents down the middle

    The post has resonated with a lot of parents. “How do I send this to my mom without sending this to my mom,” said one commenter.

    “I’m so glad to hear someone say this,” added another. “My parents make very little effort and don’t reach out (but fake to the world they do) or see my children very often. I feel they should make the effort to maintain the relationship but sometimes wonder if I am wrong. So I am glad to see someone else shares my opinion.”

    One parent even revealed: “My daughter’s grandmother says ‘she doesn’t contact me’. My daughter is 8.”

    Advertisement

    Even some grandparents were in agreement that the onus should be on grandparents to reach out and make the effort. “I’m the grandparent. I will always be the one to make the effort,” shared one commenter.

    But others disagreed with Helen’s view. “I respectfully disagree… my kids are the grandkids’ parent therefore I think it’s important for my kids to control raising their kids,” said one grandparent. “My kids know I’m always there for backup but I never take control.”

    Some noted that grandparents might still be working, which can pose challenges with how involved they can be: “Not all grandparents are retired with a healthy retirement fund! The longer the grandparents are needing to work – less time available for the grand[kids].”

    Others suggested relationships are a two-way street, and it shouldn’t just be on grandparents to foster this relationship.

    Advertisement

    “Ok but hear me out,” said one respondent. “Me and my husband should also put in the effort to visit his parents and also my parents. It goes both ways.”

    Source link

    Advertisement
    Continue Reading

    Politics

    The House | Misunderstood, over interpreted, unrepresentative: How to read the local election results

    Published

    on

    Misunderstood, over interpreted, unrepresentative: How to read the local election results
    Misunderstood, over interpreted, unrepresentative: How to read the local election results


    5 min read

    The internet will be teeming with hot takes as soon as the first declarations come in on Friday morning. To help you navigate a weekend of noise, here is a guide to what we can actually glean from the local election results.

    Advertisement

    If there is one thing most pollsters and analysts can agree on, it’s that the UK local election system is a bit of a mess. Some councils have all-outs, some go in thirds. Mayoral elections run on different cycles, and different parts of the country use different electoral systems and even have different electorates.

    From an analysis perspective, it’s hard to think of a slipperier basis on which to take stock of the country as a whole. And yet, every May, this is what we are called to do. In the first 24 or 48 hours, the fog of poll descends, and political pronouncements are made on incomplete, unrepresentative or misinterpreted results. Given the Prime Minister’s difficult political situation, this is even more likely to be the case this year.

    That being the case, there are a few points worth bearing in mind as we head into that chaotic post-election period. The idea is to guard against incomplete or premature arguments and to share what, from Persuasion’s extensive research, we already know that we know.

    Remember, Reform started from a baseline of nothing

    The relevant baseline for most of the elections happening this year is 2022. In 2022, Reform UK as a party barely existed (in England, it made a gain of precisely two seats). This is worth remembering when Reform starts clocking up lots of councillors early on in the night (areas more favourable to them report earlier on Friday morning). It’s almost certain they’ll gain thousands of seats as these wards, frozen in the mists of 2022, become updated to the politics of 2026.

    Advertisement

    The scale of Reform’s gains will be large but likely consistent with a party that has gone from a rounding error to a quarter of the national vote. This is far from irrelevant, of course, but it’s not new information – it’s there in the national polls, and it was there at last year’s locals. We learnt in 2025 that Reform’s post-2024 surge was real rather than a phantom of polling error.

    For what it’s worth, if you really want to use councillor gains as a metric, respected local elections analyst Stephen Fisher judges that “Reform need more than +2270 net gains to really provide convincing evidence of the improvement that opinion polls suggest they have made since last year.”

    Wait for the NEV

    In time-honoured tradition, the best analysis will probably arrive too late – after a million terrible hot takes have already spawned. That said, it is worth waiting for it anyway. 

    Advertisement

    The national equivalent vote share (NEV), or projected national vote share (PNS), will probably come on the Saturday or Sunday after polling day. This is a piece of analysis, usually from the BBC and Sky, that works out national vote shares implicit in the results, adjusting for the fact that not every area is holding elections. It is essentially the only clean basis on which you can extrapolate the results of the May elections to a wider national picture.  

    Using this, we’ll be able to more cleanly compare the directional movement of each party. The performance of Reform and of the Greens – two parties set to make gains mostly at the expense of Labour – will indicate whether their good national polling has legs. It’s also distinctly possible that, despite making significant net gains (and therefore being able to spin a narrative of a successful set of elections), they could underperform their polling. 

    Badenoch Starmer

    Another thing to watch out for here is the Restore number. While Rupert Lowe’s party picking up a handful of seats will tell us little about their national viability, if they can clock anything here, that would be a cause of significant concern for Farage and co.

    To make things messier, sometimes PNS and NEV differ slightly – and only cover local elections, not devolved elections happening simultaneously in Scotland and Wales. They also obviously can’t predict national elections held in three years. But with all those caveats, they’re still by far the best metrics we have.

    Advertisement

    Labour losing seats to Reform does not equate to Labour losing votes to Reform

    Finally, there’s the risk of a more classic ecological fallacy as results come in. That is, if a party loses in one area and another party gains in the same, the assumption is that the losing party has lost because their voters have switched to the winning one. This will be true in some areas, but not in others.

    It’s especially worth remembering when Labour loses wards to Reform. Previous Persuasion work has shown that even in areas where the Greens or Liberal Democrats are in no position to win, Labour has primarily been shedding votes to progressive parties rather than directly losing votes to Reform. Likewise, turnout matters hugely here – it’s very likely a lot of Labour voters will simply stay at home, while Reform and Green voters will be more motivated to turn out. This will account for a lot of seat movement, rather than direct switching.

    Likewise, while geographic variations – Red Walls, Blue Walls, and so on – do matter, it’s important not to overstate them. Right now, Labour is getting creamed pretty evenly right across the country, just with different parties benefitting, directly or otherwise. 

     

    Advertisement

    Steve Akehurst is the director of the polling and research organisation Persuasion UK

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Politics

    The Best Exercise For Stronger Shins And Calves

    Published

    on

    The Best Exercise For Stronger Shins And Calves

    We’ve written before at HuffPost UK about “Japanese walking,” “incline walking”, “6-6-6 walking”, and “retro walking”.

    But if you want to strengthen your calves and shins, either for running or just for better mobility, some experts, like physical therapist Dr Jo, reccomend “heel walking”.

    In the caption of a YouTube video, they shared: “Walking on heels is a great exercise for helping with lower leg injuries and muscle imbalances. It can also help with ankle pain and plantar fasciitis.”

    What are heel walks?

    Advertisement

    Happily, it doesn’t involve walking in high heels.

    They’re performed by lifting your toes and the balls of your feet up and walking on a flat surface on your heels. You can go forward or backwards with your feet hip-width apart, physical therapist group Therapeutic Associates Inc shared.

    They should be short, small steps. “The aim is to point your toes as much as you can towards the ceiling so there is as much dorsiflexion in the ankle as possible,” said Runna.

    You should keep your upper body tall with your eyes looking straight forward. Tuck your elbows in and let your arms follow your leg movements.

    Advertisement

    Keep your glutes and hips tucked in.

    Theraputic Associates Inc added, “you may want to perform this exercise to fatigue as in, you can’t keep your toes up off the ground anymore and exhaust the shin muscles”.

    What are the benefits of heel walks?

    Runna explained that, “Heel walks are a very simple but effective warm-up exercise for the muscle that runs along the front of the shin bone (tibialis anterior).”

    Advertisement

    This is responsible for keeping your feet lifted and preventing a condition called “foot drop”. Calling it an “underappreciated muscle,” Mirafit added that a strong tibialis anterior contributes to healthy movements of the lower leg which are “all essential when it comes to everyday life and specifically when walking and hiking.”

    It may help to prevent shin splints, increase your balance and mobility, and reduce your risk of overuse injuries because they make you better at absorbing shocks, they continued.

    Heel walks also stretch your calf muscles and strengthen the flexors in your foot, Runna said.

    Advertisement

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2025