Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

UN expert alarmed by systemic erosion of the right to protest in UK

Published

on

Composite image showing UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association in front of an image of a police cordon at a pro-Palestine protest

Composite image showing UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association in front of an image of a police cordon at a pro-Palestine protest

As the Met police tool up ahead of a big day of protest in London on Saturday 16 May, the UN has warned that the UK is eroding people’s rights.

The UN special rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, Gina Romero, has called on the UK to uphold its international human rights obligations.

This follows the adoption of restrictive legislation and political calls for a blanket ban on pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

Romero said:

Advertisement

The entry into force of the UK Crime and Policing Act on 29 April introduces provisions fundamentally incompatible with international human rights obligations regarding the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly, association, and expression, and the right of participation.

Of primary concern is the vague concept of ‘cumulative disruption,’ which grants law enforcement excessive discretionary powers to restrict assemblies, disregarding the standard that peaceful protests inherently entail a level of disruption that must be accommodated.

The Act’s criminalisation of face coverings is especially problematic amidst intensified surveillance, as anonymity is often essential to protect privacy and prevent chilling effects.

By imposing further restrictions on mobilisations near places of worship, the State risks creating ‘no-go zones’ for dissent, undermining its duty to facilitate assemblies within ‘sight and sound’ of their target audience.

Yes, Starmer does take a ‘two tier’ approach to protest

On 29 April, following multiple stabbings in Golders Green, London, UK prime minister Keir Starmer said that he would consider banning some pro-Palestinian protests due to the “cumulative” effect that they were having on the UK Jewish community.

Advertisement

This statement followed Tory calls for a moratorium on all pro-Palestinian protests. The (allegedly) independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Jonathan Hall echoed these calls and:

claimed that it was ‘clearly impossible at the moment’ for such demonstrations not to ‘incubate’ antisemitism.

However, Romero called on the UK government to refrain from stigmatising and banning pro-Palestinian marches in the name of preventing antisemitism:

Antisemitism is a serious problem that must be addressed through targeted and lawful measures. It cannot justify a blanket prohibition on peaceful protest.

Romero expressed concern that the government’s approach appears to apply heightened security scrutiny to protest activity associated predominantly with Muslim communities. But it doesn’t apply equivalent scrutiny to other forms of protest with direct links to antisemitic and racist incidents.

International human rights law prohibits discrimination in the enjoyment of the right to peaceful assembly on grounds including religion and race. Romero said:

Advertisement

Where restrictions are framed around conduct, such as antisemitism, but are applied in a manner that disproportionately burdens one community defined by religion or ethnicity, this may amount to discrimination.

The freedom to assemble is foundational to a democratic society. Banning pro-Palestinian protests would be an affront to democracy. This is especially important ahead of the Nakba mobilisations that will take place on 16 May.

The special rapporteur has previously raised these concerns with the government.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

UK government faces growing calls to rule out military conscription

Published

on

A Peace Pledge Union white poppy Petition against conscription International Conscientious Objectors' Day

A Peace Pledge Union white poppy Petition against conscription International Conscientious Objectors' Day

A coalition of UK peace organisations is launching a new petition calling on the UK government to rule out military conscription, or any form of compulsory national service involving the armed forces.

Thirteen peace and faith organisations have come together to organise the petition. It arrives amid growing debate about military recruitment and national service as the UK government ramps up military spending.

Rising talk of conscription

Campaigners say they are concerned that proposals once politically unthinkable are increasingly entering mainstream debate. Commentators and military figures are regularly calling for the reintroduction of some form of conscription. The Conservatives previously proposed a form of national service for young people, while Labour is expanding a military ‘gap year’ scheme.

Speaking on behalf of the coalition, Emma Sangster from ForcesWatch said:

Advertisement

Conscription is now a threat held over young people in the UK. People talk patronisingly of national service being good for young people, as if it didn’t pose significant risks to their physical and mental health, and impose the moral burdens of warfare on them.

She added:

We do not accept that militarised security will bring real human security. We do not accept that young people in this country should be drafted into its service through compulsory measures. It’s hard to believe that anyone would want that for their children and future generations.

Meanwhile across Europe, conscription is on the rise. Serbia is reintroducing military service, while Croatia has recently become the tenth European NATO state where conscription is in force. France is introducing a voluntary form of national service.

In Germany, a new law requires 18-year-olds to register with military authorities, with provisions allowing compulsory measures in future if deemed necessary. This has prompted widespread resistance, with 45,000 schoolchildren participating in recent walkouts and protests.

UK peace campaigners argue that any attempt to reintroduce conscription in the UK would represent a major attack on civil liberties and young people’s freedom.

Advertisement

The petition states:

We reject conscription as a moral affront and an attack on human rights. It deprives young people of choices and opportunity at a vital time in their lives… Joining the armed forces is a political and moral choice that should never be forced on anyone.

It concludes:

With war escalating around the world and record numbers of civilian casualties, now is the time to stand up for peaceful and cooperative approaches to conflict resolution.

Conscientious Objectors’ Day

The petition is launching on International Conscientious Objectors’ Day (CO Day, 15 May). This is an annual event when people around the world stand in solidarity with conscientious objectors, past and present.

Events to mark CO Day are taking place in towns and cities across the UK alongside many others worldwide. There are UK events in Brighton, Edinburgh, Leicester, Manchester, Norwich, Oxford, Sheffield, Wokingham and elsewhere.

Advertisement

The National Ceremony for CO Day in London, where the petition will be announced, will feature testimonies from COs from Russia, Ukraine, the UK and other countries.

As well as opposing conscription, the petition also calls on the UK government to:

assert and uphold the rights of conscientious objectors, ensuring protection for those who refuse to participate in the armed forces.

It will be handed in to both 10 Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence.

The participating organisations are:

Advertisement
  • Anglican Pacifist Fellowship.
  • Conscience: Taxes For Peace Not War.
  • Fellowship of Reconciliation.
  • ForcesWatch.
  • Movement for the Abolition of War.
  • Network for Peace.
  • Pax Christi.
  • Peace & Justice (Scotland).
  • Peace Pledge Union.
  • Quakers in Britain.
  • The Right to Refuse to Kill Group.
  • War Resisters’ International.
  • Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

A Dangerous First-Of-Its-Kind Bill

Published

on

A Dangerous First-Of-Its-Kind Bill

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”19d0fe1c-5975-4ec4-820b-204959c68e13″}).render(“6a04a3b7e4b0cdaf88dcb201”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Eurovision Bosses Are Closely Watching Voting After Past Israel Concerns

Published

on

Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals

Eurovision’s director has said the event’s organisers are keeping a close eye on this year’s voting, after questions were raised about the 2025 Israeli delegation.

At last year’s Eurovision final, Israeli performer Yuval Raphael finished in second place overall, having come first among televoters.

Once the competition was over, several competing broadcasters voiced concerns about whether the voting system that was then in place, allowing viewers to vote for the same country as many as 20 times, “encouraged manipulation”.

Many competing countries also took issue with the fact that Israel’s government had paid for cross-platform advertising, encouraging international viewers to vote for its representative during last year’s final.

Advertisement

Ahead of this year’s event, major changes were made to the voting system, reducing the number of permitted votes from 20 to just 10, as well as introducing “enhanced technical safeguards” that would “detect and block coordinated or fraudulent voting activity”.

“Stronger limits on promotion” were also implemented to “curb disproportionate third-party influence, including government-backed campaigns”.

Over the weekend, it was revealed that Israel’s broadcaster had already been issued with a formal warning over a promotional video urging viewers to vote 10 times for the 2026 Israeli representative, Noam Bettan.

During a new interview with BBC News, Eurovision’s director Martin Green conceded that “some of the promotion by some of the broadcasters was a little disproportionate” last year, claiming that those who flout the newly-implemented rules would be subject to “further scrutiny”.

Advertisement
Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals
Martin Green pictured in Basel, Austria on Tuesday ahead of the Eurovision semi-finals

Jessica Gow/TT/Shutterstock

He also insisted we’re a “long way from” Israel’s representative being disqualified over any further breaches and that his team was overseeing this year’s voting “very, very carefully”.

“If there is a problem, we start a conversation and we try and resolve it amicably, without reaching for sanctions,” Green added.

“We hope, in a way, that you teach the world that you can solve [conflict] by being collegiate right now.”

Last week, a Eurovision spokesperson said: “On Friday 8 May it was brought to our attention that videos with an on-screen instruction to ‘vote 10 times for Israel’ had been published and released by the artist representing [Israel’s national broadcaster Kan].

Advertisement

“Within 20 minutes we had contacted the Kan delegation to ask them to immediately stop any distribution of the videos and remove them from any platforms where they had been published. They immediately acted to do this.”

A spokesperson for Kan subsequently told The Times Of Israel that they were “following all of the rules of the competition”.

Eurovision's 2026 representative Noam Bettan pictured over the weekend
Eurovision’s 2026 representative Noam Bettan pictured over the weekend

“The voting instructions of the Eurovision Song Contest that cover promotion are predominantly directed at discouraging large scale funded third-party campaigns, and we are satisfied that this video did not form part of such a campaign,” Eurovision’s spokesperson continued.

However, employing a direct call to action to vote 10 times for one artist or song is also not in line with our rules nor the spirit of the competition. The scale of our vote means that such activity cannot affect the overall result and 50% of all votes this year are supplied through professional juries.”

On Tuesday evening, Israel’s representative made it through the semi-final stage of the contest, and is due to perform again at the Eurovision final on Saturday night.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Two Doors Down Season 8 Confirmed By The BBC

Published

on

Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down

Two Doors Down is set to return for an eighth full-length season, three years on from the death of its co-creator Simon Carlyle.

Centring around a group of neighbours in the suburbs of Glasgow, Two Doors Down began airing in 2016, and was created by writing duo Simon Carlyle and Gregor Sharp.

On Wednesday evening, the BBC announced that the sitcom will be back for a new run of episodes, which will reunite the entire cast.

Advertisement

In a statement, Gregor Sharp said: “It was a lot of fun putting the band back together for the Christmas episode last year, so I’m really excited to be coming back with some new tunes, which we hope will turn out just as special.

“The cast are the most talented group of performers you could wish for, and I can’t wait to get started.”

Fans can look forward to appearances from all of Two Doors Down’s main cast in the new episodes, including Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan, Elaine C Smith, Jonathan Watson and Alex Norton.

Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down
Alex Norton, Arabella Weir, Doon Mackichan and Jonathan Watson will all return in the new season of Two Doors Down

A synopsis for the new season teases: “Series eight picks up exactly where the 2025 Christmas special left us. Beth and Eric are still clinging to the hope of a quiet life, but their best efforts are no match for the relentless chaos supplied by neighbours Colin, Cathy and Christine.

“Meanwhile, Michelle is preparing for the new arrival, while Gordon throws himself into further education. Alan and Ian return too, doing their level best to support their partners – with mixed results.”

Advertisement

Before that, though, the cast will also be performing a string of live shows at Glasgow’s Hydro Arena over the course of September and October.

The first seven seasons of Two Doors Down are now streaming on BBC iPlayer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Fifa World Cup Halftime Show To Feature Madonna, BTS And More

Published

on

Madonna on stage at Coachella last month

Even the biggest football-sceptics among us now have a reason to get excited about the upcoming World Cup.

The global tournament is due to take place across the United States, Canada and Mexico this summer, and will culminate in a final featuring a Super Bowl-esque Halftime Show, the first in Fifa’s history.

And just wait until you check out the line-up.

K-pop sensations BTS, chart-topping superstar Shakira and the Queen of Pop herself, Madonna, were all unveiled as co-headliners of the World Cup Halftime Show on Thursday morning.

Advertisement
Madonna on stage at Coachella last month
Madonna on stage at Coachella last month

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Coa

The show is curated by Coldplay frontman Chris Martin, and was announced in a social media post featuring characters from both The Muppets and Sesame Street (the first time the two former Jim Henson Company characters have shared the screen in decades, since the latter was bought by Disney in the early 2000s).

Watch the extremely cute video for yourself below:

In the lead-up to the announcement, Shakira teased last week that she had a new song to coincide with the World Cup, following the huge success of 2010’s Waka Waka (This Time For Africa).

The new track, Dai Dai, will serve as the official anthem of the World Cup, and will seemingly feature the singer Burna Boy.

Advertisement

Shakira previously co-headlined the Super Bowl Halftime Show in 2020, where she shared the stage with Jennifer Lopez.

Fellow headliner Madonna is also a former Super Bowl performer, setting a new record for viewing figures with her halftime set in 2012 (though this record has since been bested by several other Super Bowl headliners).

The 2026 World Cup final is due to take place on Sunday 19 July.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nicki Minaj Weighs In On Kemi Badenoch In The Commons

Published

on

Nicki Minaj Weighs In On Kemi Badenoch In The Commons

Kemi Badenoch has just won over the support of none other than the controversial American rapper Nicki Minaj for her performance in the House of Commons.

The Conservative leader has been widely praised by Keir Starmer’s critics for demolishing the prime minister over ongoing speculation he could be ousted from office on Wednesday.

Speaking shortly after the King’s Speech – where the monarch lays out the government’s legislative plans for the upcoming parliamentary session – the leader of the opposition also took aim at health secretary Wes Streeting’s ambitions for office.

One particular clip of her attacks exceeded 1.8 million views.

Advertisement

In the viral video, Badenoch said: “Scrapping NHS England, something the prime minister announced 14 months ago – but I suppose the health secretary has been a it distracted lately hasn’t he?”

Looking straight at Streeting on the front bench, she said: “He’s chuntering now, why don’t you just do your job? Do your job!”

Badenoch added: “There’s no point him giving me dirty looks, we all know what he has been up to. We all know.”

Evidently that video made it across the pond as Minaj shared it on X, commenting: “The UK is truly one of a kind. They will portray her [Badenoch] in film & TV one day…just like they did with Margaret Thatcher.”

Advertisement

The rapper has drifted into right-wing politics over the last year and even met up with Donald Trump at the White House in February, describing herself as the US president’s “no.1 fan”.

Badenoch has also attracted the support of another divisive American rapper, Azealia Banks, since becoming Conservative leader.

In April, Banks wrote on social media: “Kemi Badenoch is fucking iconic. World leaders will respect her Professionalism alot more than goofball Nigel.

“Plus she’s not a Punk. Shes not running her mouthy and talking shit because she will really go to war with Putin and win.”

Advertisement

😩 The UK is truly one of a kind.

They will portray her in film & TV one day…just like they did with
Margaret Thatcher. https://t.co/T7E1gVsbUa

— Nicki Minaj (@NICKIMINAJ) May 13, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

This Is What Teenagers Say Is Worrying Them The Most

Published

on

'Air Traffic Controller Parenting' Could Help Build Teen Resilience

I often think about how tough it must be to be a teenager right now. Between the pressures of school life and the inability to get away from it all thanks to the 24/7 nature of social media, it sounds pretty exhausting.

But what is it actually like? And what’s keeping the nation’s teenagers up at night? A 2025 survey by BBC Radio 5 Live and BBC Bitesize shed some light.

The online poll of 2,000 kids aged 13-18 explored the issues shaping teenagers’ lives – from mental health and safety to the rise of AI.

What is the biggest worry for teens?

Advertisement

Getting kids to open up about what’s worrying them can be like drawing blood from a stone for plenty of parents. But the survey offered some insights into what teens worry about most.

Over two-thirds (69%) of all participants reported feeling anxious at least some of the time, with pressure around exams and grades being the biggest worry.

Its survey of 1,000 15- to 18-year-olds taking GCSE or A-Levels found 63% said it was hard to cope in the lead-up to, and during, these exams. Of these, 13% had suicidal thoughts and 13% self-harmed. More than half (56%) had trouble sleeping.

Among those struggling, 61% experienced anxiety and 40% worsening mental health, while 30% skipped meals and one in four (26%) had panic attacks.

Advertisement

The research also found exams were more than twice as likely to have a significant negative impact on mental health than social media.

May – which is when school exam season starts for most – is the peak season for children to call Childline about exam stress. Between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026; the free, confidential service for kids delivered 1,679 counselling sessions where exam or revision stress was mentioned.

The majority of concerns about exam stress were from children aged 12-18 years old, however younger students are also impacted, with 11% of contacts coming from children aged 11 and under.

One young person, aged 16, said: “If I’m not revising for exams, I feel this panic in my chest, but the panic also stops me focusing on the revision when I try and do it.”

Advertisement

Another 16-year-old girl said they have plans for their future, but have completely lost motivation to revise. “I have no idea why, my friends are trying to help get me back on track but I’m so overwhelmed,” they said.

What else did the BBC’s teen survey find?

It found 65% of teens feel overwhelmed at least some of the time and almost three-quarters (74%) of girls feel anxious at least some of the time.

Another eye-opening finding was just how much time teens are spending on their phones: more than a third (38%) spend five hours or more a day, while one in 20 spend eight hours or more.

Advertisement

When they are online, more than half reported having seen sexist and racist content. Two in five (44%) said they have seen extremely violent content.

In real life, 44% worry about knife crime in their local area and almost one third (30%) of teenage girls have experienced sexual harassment in school.

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly popular among the younger generation, with almost half (47%) using it to help with homework or coursework.

This is rising year-on-year – the figure was 36% in 2024 and 29% in 2023.

Advertisement

Despite the challenges teens face today, nearly eight in 10 (79%) are feeling positive about their future.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jet2 Power Bank Rules 2026: Why Your Portable Charger Is Banned Without A Clear Wh Rating

Published

on

Jet2 Power Bank Rules 2026: Why Your Portable Charger Is Banned Without A Clear Wh Rating

Passengers hoping to bring their “smart bags”, which have chargers in them, might be disappointed: those “with non-removable batteries above 2.7Wh are not permitted onboard,” sites like Ryanair advise.

That’s because they contain lithium batteries, which power banks also have.

These can sometimes short-circuit and are generally not permitted in the hold as they can catch fire.

And on their site, Jet2 said that they ban “lithium-ion batteries, lithium metal batteries and power banks that don’t clearly state” an important rating.

Advertisement

Power banks need to show their watt/hour rating

Those that don’t include the “watt-hour rating or lithium metal content, or where the watt-hour rating cannot easily be otherwise ascertained, are forbidden”.

A watt-hour rating is usually shortened to Wh. Power banks should have a rating “not exceeding 160Wh, providing they are individually protected against short circuit”, Jet2 said.

What if my power bank doesn’t have a Wh rating?

Advertisement

This doesn’t need to be on the power bank explicitly, as you can work it out from the milliampere-hour (mAh), ampere-hour (Ah), and/or nominal voltage (V).

Once you find these, the UK Civil Aviation Authority said: “You can arrive at the number of watt-hours your battery provides if you know the battery’s nominal voltage (V) and capacity in ampere-hours (Ah) using this calculation ― Ah x V = Wh.

“If only the milliampere hours (mAh) are marked on the battery, then divide that number by 1000 to get ampere-hours (Ah). For example, 4400 mAh / 1000 = 4.4 Ah.”

If none of these is available, though, your power bank might not pass muster.

Advertisement

Don’t bring more than two power banks with you, either

Those are only some of the rules the airline enforces.

  • No more than two power banks per passenger,
  • Power banks should not exceed 160Wh,
  • Power banks can’t be charged whilst onboard the aircraft,
  • Power banks can’t be used on-flight,
  • Power banks have to be carried on-board in hand luggage and placed under your seat,
  • Power banks must not be used to charge or power any portable electronic devices during taxi, take off, and landing.

Jet2 is not the only airline to have some or all of these rules, so check with your airline before flying.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Which Garden ‘Weeds’ Do You Actually Need To Remove?

Published

on

Which Garden 'Weeds' Do You Actually Need To Remove?

We’re all about biodiverse gardens here at HuffPost UK, and no-mow May is a great time to rewild your backyard.

But sometimes, as is the case with invasive Japanese knotweed (which can cause structural damage to your home if not treated ASAP), certain plants are better off out of your yard.

So, we thought we’d ask the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS)’s chief horticulturalist, Guy Barter, about which ones you should banish on sight (and others you should keep a careful eye on, as well as the ones you should bear with).

1) Plants not to let grow in the first place

Advertisement

“Some alliums, such as:

  • three-cornered garlic, and
  • crow garlic

are extraordinarily tricky to winkle out as they leave little bulbils behind when uprooted,” the gardening expert told us.

“Never let them gain a lodgement in the first place, ideally.”

Three-cornered garlic (AKA three-cornered leek) is an invasive species that can smother native wildflowers. It’s an offence to cause it to grow in the wild, and it can be removed by hand-weeding the bulbs.

Crow garlic, meanwhile, spreads very easily and can take over your garden if you’re not careful. Fork out seedlings or smother plants with e.g. cardboard and bark.

Advertisement

2) Plants to stop in their tracks

“In general, gardeners would be unwise to leave invasive weeds such as:

  • bindweed,
  • ground elder, and
  • couch grass

to their own devices,” Barter told us.

“Not only are they very invasive, but [they] are [also] hard to dislodge.”

Bindweed, while sometimes beneficial for wildlife, can be very hard to remove from your garden due to its enormous and rapidly spreading roots. It can be controlled by placing physical barriers at least 45cm into the ground, deadheading flowers, smothering young plants, mowing often, and forking out seedlings.

Advertisement

Ground elder can lead to a “carpet of leaves”. Fork out plants, smother them, place a barrier 45cm or more deep around them, mow more, and pull off new growth.

And couch grass, which can spread like wildfire, can be forked out or smothered.

3) Plants to keep a close eye on

“Many garden plants are very ‘willing’ and although valuable in places where other plants won’t grow, can run amok in fertile, sunny, moist soil,” Barter said.

Advertisement
  • Solidago,
  • certain bamboos,
  • montbretia,
  • mind-your-own-business [Soleirolia soleirolii],
  • borage,
  • horseradish, and
  • mint

“Come to mind,” he added.

That’s not to say they need to be removed, though.

“Constant vigilance and an occasional going round with a spade ensure these plants stay in [their] lane. Repeat transgressors must go, however.”

4) Plants to let grow, despite being a bit of a pain

Slightly annoying plants can still be worth it, considering how useful they are to your garden’s ecosystem.

Advertisement

“Some unwanted plants like:

  • nettles,
  • green alkanet,
  • thistles,
  • sow thistles, and
  • hedge mustard,

although apt to spread, can be given a little slack in view of their value to insects.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Why are US CEOs lining up meet what they called the funder of the largest state sponsor of terrorism?

Published

on

China

China

Just about ten days ago, the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News that China was buying 90% of ​Iran’s energy, “so they are funding the largest state sponsor of terrorism.”

Bessent may have got the country wrong, as it has been the USA that is the destabilising power in the world. So if anyone is funding war and destruction, it is the USA.

Just this year, it has assassinated sovereign state leaders, kidnapped a head of state, started an illegal war against Iran, increased the stranglehold of Cuba, killed civilians in acts of perfidy in the Caribbean sea, armed Israel to kill innocents in Lebanon, and continued its genocide in Palestine.

Today, Bessent, along with Trump and a dozen American CEOs, is in China for bilateral talks.

Advertisement

The United States is perfectly willing to lecture Beijing on terrorism while dispatching its corporate elite to cut deals and chase market access.

Highly awkward and unusual situation

Biden, in his two terms, did not visit China. The last visit to China by a US head of state was by Trump, nine years ago.

Presumably, the China hawks in the US, like Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton, who are unable to distinguish between Singapore and China, would have criticised Biden too much, so he avoided it.

Cotton’s clip on not knowing the difference between two Asian countries went viral, and he was still posting about menacing “Communist China” filling his beloved America with dangerous products while his MAGA hero was in there.

Advertisement

The cultish MAGA does indeed allow Trump to get away with anything.

Advertisement

Even the hawkish Washington think tanks are trying to sell this self-confessed “highly awkward” visit.

Rush Doshi of the US think tank Council on Foreign Relations:

This meeting is coming at an unusual time. It’s coming at a time when there is a detente right now between the U.S. and China, an uneasy kind of equilibrium. But in the backdrop is Iran. The very fact that a U.S. president is going to China while he’s also having his military blockade Chinese ships in the Strait of Hormuz is a highly awkward and unusual situation.

Doshi said that while Trump was bringing a smaller “but very impressive” delegation of about a dozen CEOs to China, including Elon Musk, Wall Street financial heads, Boeing, and Qualcomm, representing a diverse range of industries, which is a smaller group than the 40 CEOs he took to the Gulf in 2025. 

China — CEOs galore

So why are the CEOs there? The answer is simple — whether the US likes it or not, China is a resolute competitor and trading partner. They are there to “unlock regulatory approvals, market access, and investment opportunities.”

Advertisement

Musk is there because China is weighing curbs on exports of solar manufacturing equipment to the United States, which could threaten plans by Tesla to build new factories or expand existing ones to boost local production, according to Reuters.

Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Reuters last month that the US plane maker was counting on the Trump administration to help unlock a long-awaited major order from China 500 737 Max jets.

Cargill is there because the US wants China to increase its purchases of agriculture from the United States, according to Bloomberg.

Meta is there seemingly because China recently blocked Meta’s $2 billion acquisition of Chinese-founded AI startup Manus, Bloomberg implies.

Advertisement

Washington has previously restricted sales of advanced semiconductors primarily from Nvidia to China in an effort to limit the country’s AI development. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang was reportedly added late to Trump’s delegation to China. The USA took some of these restrictions away in January, but China has refused to buy any so far.

War on Iran

If the USA is looking for subservience from China, like it commands from the UAE, Israel, or the UK, this is unlikely.

China’s South China Morning Post reported that a Chinese company that tracked US bombers over Iran, despite sanctions, wears sanctions with pride. The report said:

Advertisement
Chinese satellite imagery firm MizarVision, which rose to fame with its analysis of American military deployments in the US-Israel war on Iran, is treating its addition to the US sanctions list as a badge of honour in its hiring campaign.

Looks like Trump and Bessent are stuck with doing business with the “funders of state-sponsored terrorism.”

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025