Crypto World
BTC Ecosystem partners with AntPool and Bitmain to reshape the future of crypto mining
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Bitcoin mining enters a new era as Bitmain and AntPool push hash rate financialization and ecosystem integration.
Summary
- Bitcoin mining is shifting toward a broader “BTC Ecosystem” model focused on hash-rate financialization and infrastructure integration.
- BTC Ecosystem uses renewable-powered mining operations across Texas, Canada, and Australia.
- The company positions low-cost renewable energy, ASIC efficiency, and scalable infrastructure as key long-term mining advantages.
Throughout the history of cryptocurrency, mining has remained the ironclad foundation safeguarding Bitcoin’s network security and decentralization. Yet with the rapid emergence of the “BTC Ecosystem” narrative, the mining industry is evolving far beyond the traditional model of simply “mining and selling coins.” A new era centered on the financialization of hash rate is now taking shape.
Against this backdrop, the strategic alliance between Bitmain, AntPool, and leading BTC ecosystem projects signals a profound transformation underway across the mining sector. From hardware efficiency and hash rate allocation to capital deployment and ecosystem integration, the industry is entering a new phase of vertical integration — a strategic evolution increasingly favored by Western capital markets.
Core technology: Pushing the limits of computing efficiency
The technological foundation of this collaboration lies in the deep integration of next-generation mining hardware with the rapidly expanding BTC ecosystem infrastructure. At the center of this evolution is Bitmain’s latest Antminer S21 Pro series, delivering an industry-leading energy efficiency ratio below 15J/T. Through deeper protocol-level optimization, miners can achieve more stable firmware upgrades and significantly faster response speeds when processing complex inscriptions and Bitcoin Layer 2 transactions, laying the groundwork for a more efficient and scalable mining ecosystem.
To meet the growing demand for high-frequency computing within the BTC ecosystem, AntPool and its strategic partners are accelerating the large-scale deployment of liquid-cooling infrastructure. Standardized liquid-cooled mining cabinets not only extend the operational lifespan of ASIC chips but also improve heat dissipation efficiency by nearly 40%. This advancement enables industrial-scale mining farms to transition toward a more stable and efficient “high-frequency profitability” model, further enhancing overall operational performance.
At the same time, industry speculation suggests that future Antminer models may integrate dedicated modules designed to accelerate Bitcoin Layer 2 zero-knowledge proof (ZK) computation. If realized, this innovation would fundamentally redefine the role of mining hardware — transforming miners from simple block producers into decentralized computing providers capable of supporting DApps, sidechains, and broader BTC ecosystem infrastructure.
What is the BTC Ecosystem?
The BTC Ecosystem is operated byADAPT ECOSYSTEM PTY LTD, an Australia-registered company regulated under the oversight framework of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Established in October 2022, the company focuses on building next-generation mining infrastructure powered by renewable energy, positioning itself at the intersection of Bitcoin mining, sustainable energy, and ecosystem expansion.
Its mining operations are strategically distributed across multiple global regions to optimize both energy efficiency and long-term scalability. In Texas, operations benefit from a mature and highly stable power grid capable of supporting large-scale, continuous mining activity. In Canada, abundant hydroelectric resources provide cleaner and more cost-efficient energy solutions, helping improve operational efficiency while maintaining competitive mining costs.
Meanwhile, in Australia, the company is progressively integrating solar and wind energy into its infrastructure strategy to support the sustainable expansion of its mining ecosystem. This multi-regional energy deployment model reflects the broader industry trend toward greener, more resilient, and institutionally scalable Bitcoin mining operations.
Investment potential: From commodities to creating yield-generating contracts
In the eyes of institutional investors in Europe and the United States, simply holding Bitcoin yields Beta returns, while participating in this “mining + ecosystem” collaboration is the key to obtaining Alpha returns

BTC Ecosystem operates data centers sited in regions tied to long-term renewable energy contracts. Geothermal, hydro, and wind power the fleet, and the company reports operating costs roughly 30% below the industry average as a result. Hardware is a current-generation ASIC, with continuous firmware management and redundancy built into the facility layer.
The renewable footprint is not just an ESG talking point. As global mining difficulty continues to climb, marginal cost decides the difference between a profitable operation and a stranded fleet. Siting compute near cheap, contracted renewable power is the structural advantage the company is building around.
Contract tiers and a $15 no-deposit trial
The platform’s contract menu is tiered by capital commitment and duration. Headline tiers include:
- A $15 welcome contract is activated at signup, returning $0.53 per day. This contract is designed to let new users see daily settlement before committing capital of their own.
- A $1,500 contract over 10 days, returning approximately $21.75 per day.
- A $9,000 contract over 20 days, returning approximately $142.20 per day.
- A $30,000 contract over 30 days, returning approximately $528 per day.
- Institutional-scale allocations up to $300,000, with daily returns reported in the four-figure range.
Earnings settle to user accounts on a 24-hour cadence. Withdrawals become available once a balance reaches $100. The platform supports BTC, ETH, USDT (ERC20 and TRC20), LTC, BCH, XRP, SOL, and DOGE for both deposits and payouts.
Industry observations and future outlook
This strategic collaboration sends a clear signal to the market: Bitcoin is evolving beyond “digital gold” into a decentralized computing platform. As the BTC ecosystem expands, mining infrastructure is no longer limited to block production, but is becoming a core layer supporting Layer 2 networks, DApps, and on-chain computation.
At the same time, ESG compliance and institutional adoption are accelerating industry transformation. Bitmain’s high-efficiency mining hardware aligns more closely with Western ESG standards, making large-scale mining infrastructure increasingly attractive to institutional capital, including pension funds and insurance investors.
However, as industry giants strengthen collaboration and improve operational efficiency, hashrate decentralization remains a key concern within the crypto community. In response, AntPool and its partners have emphasized more transparent pooling mechanisms and governance models. Ultimately, this shift represents not only an advancement in mining technology, but also a new era of capital efficiency — where transforming “cold computing power” into a thriving ecosystem may define the next crypto cycle.
For more information, visit the official website.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Crypto World
Binance Wallet Event Rush turns on chain events into tradable markets
Binance Wallet has rolled out Event Rush, a 42.space powered dApp on BNB Chain that lets verified users buy and trade tokens representing real world event outcomes using USDT on BSC.
Summary
- Event Rush lets users speculate on sports, crypto prices, and news outcomes via event tokens
- Pricing uses a bonding curve model instead of fixed odds or a traditional order book
- Users can sell tokens before settlement or hold to share in the USDT prize pool at expiration
- Access is limited to KYC verified Binance Wallet users and excludes restricted regions
According to the official announcement, Event Rush is integrated directly into Binance Wallet and “transforms real world outcomes into tradable tokens” on BNB Chain, with users able to access the feature through the dApp section of the wallet interface.
The product is built on the 42.space protocol, and Binance explains that “Event Rush is where token trading meets real world events,” allowing users to buy event tokens on topics including sports scores, cryptocurrency price targets, and news developments.
How does Binance Event Rush work as an on chain prediction venue?
FinanceFeeds reports that each outcome is represented by a distinct event token, and prices are set via a bonding curve that automatically adjusts based on supply and demand rather than a central bookmaker or external market maker.
Every purchase mints event tokens along the curve, pushing the price higher as demand increases, while selling burns tokens and moves the price back down, which keeps a two sided price available even when liquidity is thin.
Per Binance, users fund trades with USDT on BNB Smart Chain, can exit positions at any time before settlement by selling back into the curve, or hold through resolution to claim a share of the USDT collateral pool if their chosen outcome is correct.
FinanceFeeds notes that winners “share the entire USDT collateral pool, including value from losing tokens,” creating theoretically uncapped upside for popular, correctly priced outcomes while losers forfeit their stake.
The structure blends speculative trading and pari mutuel style payoff mechanics, since all stakes on losing outcomes are redistributed proportionally to winning token holders at settlement rather than paid out at fixed odds.
Binance states that Event Rush is available to “all verified Binance Wallet users” but that it “may not be accessible in certain restricted regions,” framing the product as a Web3 feature distinct from centralized derivatives even as it clearly enables real money betting on future events.
Is Event Rush a prediction market or entertainment product?
From a design perspective, Event Rush functions much like an on chain prediction market, but Binance consistently brands the product around “event tokens” and “trading real world events” rather than using the language of betting or derivatives in its public communications.
This linguistic choice comes as some regulators have started classifying decentralized prediction platforms as unlicensed gambling, with ChainCatcher pointing to a recent Reuters report on Indonesia’s ban of Polymarket for offering “bets and speculation on events that have not yet concluded.”
At the same time, Binance is clearly leaning into this narrative space inside its wallet stack, following earlier experiments with bonding curve based token launches and the Meme Rush feature that merged speculation and community driven assets.
FinanceFeeds highlights that Event Rush “eliminates the necessity for external market makers” because the bonding curve contract itself ensures a continuous price, which is a marked contrast to centralized products like futures where liquidity is warehoused by professional desks.
The launch also comes amid a broader push to use wallet level interfaces as distribution for experimental markets, echoing what Unchained has described in coverage of Binance’s Pump fun style bonding curve model and earlier bonding curve token launches.
For now, Event Rush sits in a regulatory grey zone between derivative exposure and entertainment, but by routing activity through BNB Chain and the 42.space protocol while limiting access to KYC users, Binance appears to be betting it can keep the infrastructure sufficiently “on chain” to frame the product as a Web3 event trading layer rather than a conventional sportsbook.
If that positioning holds, Event Rush could become a template for how large exchanges front end decentralized prediction rails, much as DeFi options and perpetuals have already blurred the line between on chain protocols and exchange style user experiences.
Crypto World
Michael Saylor Didn’t Buy Bitcoin This Week: Here’s What Strategy Bought Instead
Strategy passed on Bitcoin this week, directing capital instead toward repurchasing approximately $1.5 billion of its own convertible bonds below face value.
Executive chairman Michael Saylor described the decision as temporary. He suggested the company’s Bitcoin accumulation engine is already preparing for its next move.
What Are Strategy’s Bonds?
Strategy’s convertible senior notes are corporate debt instruments with no interest rate, set to mature in 2029. Holders can convert them into company shares if Strategy’s stock crosses a defined price threshold. The company raised $3 billion through this structure in November 2024, channeling proceeds almost entirely into Bitcoin (BTC) purchases.
Repurchasing that debt at a discount serves two purposes. It reduces future liabilities and frees up balance sheet flexibility ahead of the next BTC buying round. Strategy paid approximately $1.38 billion in cash to retire $1.5 billion of face-value obligations, locking in a saving of around $120 million. The firm had already posted a Q1 2026 accounting loss of $12.5 billion, driven largely by unrealized Bitcoin write-downs under new accounting rules.
On X, Saylor framed the week’s move as a deliberate pause.
The “BitVac” metaphor describes Strategy’s Bitcoin buying machine. The week’s slowest BTC buy of 2026 had already signaled a near-term deceleration, making a full pause notable but not entirely surprising.
As of May 24, Strategy holds 843,738 BTC worth approximately $64.45 billion at an average purchase price of $75,701 per coin, across 110 transactions since August 2020. The firm’s STRC share program outpaced ETF inflows in BTC accumulation for much of the year.
Peter Schiff has raised MicroStrategy death spiral concerns, arguing the model depends on perpetually rising BTC prices. The gold advocate has also slammed STRC leverage risks as structurally unsound. He may view the bond repurchase as further evidence of financial strain rather than strategic discipline.
Whether the BitVac fires up again next week or further debt management takes priority is the key signal to watch.
The post Michael Saylor Didn’t Buy Bitcoin This Week: Here’s What Strategy Bought Instead appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
3 Key Scenarios for XRP Price To Hit a New All-Time High in 2026, Claude Predicts
The broader crypto market dropped more than 5% this week, yet XRP whales accumulated 71 million tokens, ETF inflows held firm, and ledger activity surged sharply.
Claude analyzed the catalysts, the risks, and the realistic path forward, outlining three scenarios that could define the trajectory of XRP throughout 2026.
Whales and Ledger Activity Defy the Market Slump
XRP accumulation refers to large wallets increasing their holdings during price weakness, signaling long-term conviction rather than panic.
Data shared by analyst Ali Martinez shows whales added 71 million XRP over seven days while the token traded near $1.36, marking one of the most aggressive accumulation phases in recent months.
This pattern matters because it reframes the narrative around the recent sell-off. Stronger hands are expanding exposure while weaker holders exit positions, even though the price has yet to reflect the buying pressure in any meaningful way.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Whale behavior often precedes major directional moves, and the current setup suggests that institutional confidence remains intact despite negative headlines across the broader crypto market.
XRP Ledger activity also strengthened during the downturn, painting a picture that contradicts the bearish price action.
Account-to-account payments climbed from under one million at the start of the week to 1.22 million by May 22, according to XRPScan data.
The jump reflects genuine network usage rather than speculative trading on centralized exchanges.
ETF inflows added another layer of underlying demand that institutional investors clearly value. SoSoValue data shows XRP spot products attracted over $65 million last week, with another $22,04 million in net daily inflows arriving this week despite broader market weakness.
The consistency of these flows during a correction is particularly noteworthy.
These ETF flows differ fundamentally from ordinary exchange trading. Buyers are accessing XRP through structured vehicles, not leveraged positions or short-term speculation, creating a quieter but more durable layer of underlying support beneath the current price action.
Together, whale accumulation, network usage, and ETF inflows form a three-pillar foundation that could shape the next move once sentiment turns.
Claude Maps 3 Scenarios for XRP in 2026
Claude analyzed the current XRP landscape and identified three distinct trajectories that could happen throughout the rest of 2026.
Each scenario depends on how regulation, institutional flows, and broader market conditions interact during the coming months.
Claude points to Senate approval of the CLARITY Act as the most decisive regulatory catalyst still pending, while Standard Chartered lowered the target from $8 to $2.80 by the end of 2026 under bullish conditions.
Federal Reserve rate cuts could also accelerate institutional rotation into higher-risk digital assets during the second half of the year.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
However, the chatbot also highlights structural obstacles that limit upside potential. Up to 2,6 billion XRP could be released from escrow before year-end, creating fresh selling pressure across the market.
ETF inflows still trail far behind the volumes seen in Bitcoin and Ethereum products, while macroeconomic uncertainty and competition from stablecoins remain persistent risks throughout the cycle.
Claude concludes that the moderate scenario is the most probable outcome. The three scenarios break down as follows:
- Bullish case between $5 and $8, requiring full regulatory alignment and aggressive ETF demand
- Moderate case between $2 and $3.50, the most realistic path according to current data
- Bearish case between $0.75 and $1.50 if catalysts fail and selling pressure dominates
A new all-time high remains possible but only if regulation, institutional flows, and a broader crypto bull cycle converge simultaneously.
Without that alignment, the path forward stays defined by accumulation rather than breakout.
Remember that AI predictions like Claude’s offer useful analytical frameworks but cannot guarantee market outcomes. Always combine them with independent research, personal risk tolerance, and qualified professional financial advice.
The post 3 Key Scenarios for XRP Price To Hit a New All-Time High in 2026, Claude Predicts appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Echo Protocol Hack Autopsy: The $76 Million Exploit That Wasn’t Really a Hack
2026 DeFi losses crossed $1 billion in four months, with April alone draining $634 million across 28+ incidents, the worst month on record.
Drift ($285M) and KelpDAO ($292M) alone accounted for $577 million of April’s losses, and neither was a code exploit.
DefiLlama’s 2026 hack breakdown tells the same thing.
The biggest slices are LayerZero bridge exploits (18%), compromised admin keys (16%), spoof tokens (14%), and private key compromises (11%).
Combined, operational and key-management failures account for the majority of all stolen value this year. Smart contract bugs like re-entrancy and oracle manipulation barely register.
Echo Protocol just became the latest data point.
On May 18, an attacker broke into the Echo Protocol on Monad and printed 1,000 fake eBTC for themselves. That’s $76.7M on paper.
The problem is, fake tokens don’t buy you anything unless you can trade them for something real. So they took a small chunk, dropped it into Curvance’s lending app as collateral, and borrowed real Bitcoin against it.
Then bridged that Bitcoin to Ethereum, swapped it for ETH, and ran it through Tornado Cash. Final take: around $816,000.
Everyone’s calling it $76.7 million but the real number is $816,000, and why those two numbers are so far apart is the main story here.
This breakdown covers what happened, how, and what it says about DeFi security right now.
The bottom line: The contract was fine. A stolen admin key and lazy controls did everything else, and that’s how most of 2026’s DeFi losses are happening.
Post Mortem (The Summary)
- Echo Protocol was not hacked through bad smart contract code. The attacker stole or accessed an admin key.
- That admin key controlled minting rights for Echo’s eBTC token on Monad. One private key was enough to create fake Bitcoin-backed tokens.
- The attacker minted 1,000 fake eBTC, worth about $76.7 million on paper. But those tokens had no real BTC backing.
- They could not cash out the full amount because Monad liquidity was thin. So they used 45 fake eBTC as collateral on Curvance.
- Curvance accepted the fake eBTC as normal collateral and let the attacker borrow real WBTC.
- The attacker escaped with about $816,000 in real value, not $76.7 million.
- Echo later burned the remaining 955 fake eBTC and paused affected functions.
- Monad itself was not hacked. Curvance’s main protocol was not directly hacked either. The failure came from Echo’s admin setup and Curvance trusting newly minted collateral.
- The core lesson: DeFi attackers are now targeting keys, admins, bridges, infrastructure, and team operations more than smart contract bugs.
- Basic protections could have reduced or stopped this: multisig admin control, timelocks, mint caps, rate limits, and collateral checks.
- Echo got lucky. The attacker only failed to drain more because there was not enough liquidity to cash out the fake tokens.
The Players
Here’s the full breakdown of what happened, and how.
- Echo Protocol
A BTCFi (Bitcoin DeFi) project. Their pitch: take your BTC, get a yield-bearing wrapped version of it that works in DeFi.
Their home base is Aptos, where the token is called aBTC. They hit a peak TVL of $878 million on Aptos in May 2025, currently sitting around $254 million.
Echo expanded to Monad as part of Monad’s mainnet ecosystem push. On Monad, their wrapped BTC token is called eBTC.
This is critical: aBTC and eBTC are completely separate, non-bridgeable assets. They’re parallel deployments, not connected. The hack hit eBTC on Monad only.
- Monad
A new high-performance parallelized EVM L1. One of the hyped chains of 2025-26. Just out of the mainnet, with lots of protocols deploying fresh.
Echo is one of them. Monad itself was NOT compromised in any way. Co-founder @keoneHD confirmed the network ran normally throughout. It was a protocol-level failure on top of Monad.
- Curvance
A lending protocol deployed on Monad. Functions like Aave but with isolated markets, where each collateral asset lives in its own siloed pool so a compromised asset can’t infect the rest of the lending protocol.
They had listed eBTC as a collateral asset.
- Tornado Cash
Sanctioned ETH mixer. You send ETH in, you get ETH out from a different wallet, and break the on-chain trail. Standard exit tool for hackers.
What Got Exploited
Echo’s eBTC token on Monad is a standard ERC-20 contract that uses OpenZeppelin’s role-based access control system. This is industry standard, used by basically every serious DeFi project.
Two roles matter in its setup:
- DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE: the master role. Can grant or revoke any other role on the contract.
- MINTER_ROLE: can call mint() and create new eBTC tokens.
Normally, only Echo’s team holds these. Minting only happens when real BTC gets locked somewhere, and the team mints the matching eBTC. That’s the entire trust model behind a wrapped token.
Here’s where Echo messed up.
The DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE sat on a single EOA, basically just a normal wallet with one private key behind it. And the wallet had no safety nets. Whoever held that key could mint as much as they wanted, whenever they wanted, with nothing to slow them down.
So the entire $254M+ Echo ecosystem on Monad was, in security terms, sitting behind one private key. That key got stolen. Nobody’s said how yet. Could be phishing, malware on a team laptop, an infra breach, an insider, secrets leaked in a repo, supply chain attack through a dev tool. Echo hasn’t disclosed.
The Attack Step by Step
Date: May 18, 2026, around 5:55 PM ET
- Step 1: Attackers use the stolen admin key to grant themselves DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE on a fresh wallet. They’re now admin too.
- Step 2: From that new admin role, they grant themselves MINTER_ROLE. They can now mint.
- Step 3: They call mint(attacker_wallet, 1000e8). 1,000 eBTC shows up in their wallet. Notional value $76.7M. Real BTC backing: zero. These tokens are completely fake, phantom claims on Bitcoin that don’t exist anywhere.
- Step 4: They revoke the original Echo admin and their own admin role too. Cleanup move so it looks less suspicious on-chain. From the outside, it just looks like a random wallet holding 1,000 eBTC.
At this point, the peg is mathematically broken. There are 1,000 more eBTC tokens than there is BTC backing them.
But the attacker hasn’t actually taken anything yet. Fake tokens are worthless unless you can convert them into real money.
The Cashout Flow
You can’t just dump 1,000 fake eBTC on a DEX. Monad’s DEXs don’t have anywhere close to that liquidity. You’d crash the price to zero before extracting anything, and arbitrageurs would catch it instantly. So the attacker went to a lending market instead.
- Step 5. Deposit 45 eBTC ($3.45M paper value) into Curvance as collateral. Curvance accepts it because, from the contract’s view, eBTC is eBTC. No oracle or check that separates “freshly minted fake eBTC” from “legit BTC-backed eBTC.” That’s the second failure of this hack. Lending markets just accept new collateral at face value without checking where it came from.
- Step 6. Borrow 11.29 WBTC against it, about $868K of real wrapped Bitcoin. WBTC is the major BTC-on-Ethereum token, deep liquidity, fully backed. They now have $868K of real value, secured by $3.45M of fake collateral they’re never coming back for.
- Step 7. Bridge the WBTC to Ethereum. That’s where liquidity lives and where Tornado works.
- Step 8. Swap WBTC to ~384 ETH on Ethereum (~$822K).
- Step 9. Run the 384 ETH through Tornado Cash. Trail breaks. Funds land in fresh wallets that can’t be traced back.
Total real money out: approximately $816,000.
How Echo Responded
Within hours of the hack going public, Echo reclaimed the admin key, burned the 955 eBTC still sitting in the attacker’s wallet (which no longer exists), and paused all cross-chain functionality on Monad.
They also paused the Aptos bridge and Aptos lending even though Aptos was clean, just to be safe. Pushed a contract upgrade on Monad to restrict the affected operations and said they’d patch their other EVM bridge deployments too.
Curvance paused the eBTC market, confirmed that their own contracts were fine, and noted that their isolated market design prevented the damage from spreading to other lending pools.
Keone from Monad clarified the chain was untouched and pegged the actual loss at around $816K.
The Breakdown
The gap between $76.7 million and $816,000 is the whole story. Curvance was the only viable exit, and its depth capped the borrow at approximately $868,000.
eBTC minted
1,000 (notional $76.7M)
Deposited to Curvance
45 eBTC
WBTC borrowed
11.29 (~$868K)
Sent through Tornado
~384 ETH (~$822K)
Actually stolen
~$816K
eBTC burned by Echo
955
Aptos exposure
~$71K
ECHO drawdown
~11-12%
The other 955 eBTC had nowhere to go until Echo burned it. Monad’s thin liquidity saved Echo from a much bigger loss. On Ethereum, this would’ve been close to $76M out the door.
Why this was an operational hack, not a smart contract hack
The code wasn’t the issue. It worked the way it was supposed to. The real problem was how Echo set things up around the contract:
- The admin role was held by a single wallet instead of a multisig. Stealing a single private key was enough to take over the entire protocol.
- There was no time lock. When the attacker granted themselves admin and then minter rights, those changes went live immediately. No delay, no window for the team to notice and respond.
- The contract had no maximum supply. Minting 1,000 eBTC with zero BTC backing was technically allowed by the rules of the contract itself.
- No rate limit either. The attacker minted the entire 1,000 in a single transaction, rather than being forced to spread it out.
- Curvance accepted the freshly minted eBTC as collateral without checking whether it was legitimately backed. The lending market just saw eBTC tokens in a wallet and treated them the same as real ones.
None of these are obscure or experimental fixes. Multisigs, timelocks, mint caps, and supply checks are stuff serious DeFi protocols have been shipping for years. Echo just didn’t bother with any of them.
May 2026 looks like this
Echo is the 14th hack this month. The year so far:
| Protocol | Loss | Vector |
| KelpDAO (Apr) | $292M | RPC poisoning + DDoS (Lazarus) |
| Drift | $285M | Social engineering (Lazarus, UNC4736) |
| THORChain (May 15) | $10M+ | Vault breach |
| Verus bridge (May 17) | $11.6M | Cross-chain verification |
| Echo (May 18) | $816K | Admin key |
| Transit Finance | $1.88M | Deprecated contract |
Approximately $328.6 million lost to bridge hacks in 2026 across 8 incidents. None of these were Solidity bugs. Keys, signers, RPC endpoints, off-chain verifiers, that’s where the money is leaving now. The attackers moved up the stack. A few from this year worth paying attention to:
- Drift (April): Not a technical exploit. UNC4736 (North Korea) spent six months social engineering Drift employees, then drained $285M in 12 minutes. Six months of prep, 12 minutes of execution. That’s a military op, not a hack.
- KelpDAO (17 days later): Same group, completely different vector. They poisoned LayerZero’s RPC infrastructure and forged cross-chain messages for $292M. State-sponsored teams running multiple playbooks in parallel.
- AI is showing up too: Google confirmed the first AI-powered mass exploit on May 11 (AI found a zero-day and wrote bypass code for 2FA). GoPlus reported a 231% MoM jump in Web3 losses partly tied to AI. CrowdStrike puts the average eCrime breakout time at 29 minutes, with the fastest at 27 seconds. The attack side is automating, defense mostly isn’t.
- Resolv Labs (March): Admin key compromise on a stablecoin issuer. Attacker minted 80M unbacked USR, drained $25M, and USR depegged by 80%. Same root cause as Echo, completely different protocol type. The pattern doesn’t care what you’re building.
Ondo Finance put it bluntly in their post-incident analysis: “there is no single class of vulnerability to defend against.” That’s the part most protocols still haven’t internalized.
So when Echo got drained through a stolen admin key, it didn’t happen in a vacuum. It happened during the most hostile threat environment DeFi has ever seen, and the protocol was set up as if it were still 2022.
So what?
DeFi spent the last five years getting good at smart contract security. Audits, bug bounties, formal verification, all of it.
So the attackers stopped targeting the code and started targeting everything else. Keys, infrastructure, employees, signers. None of that gets audited.
For any wrapped BTC protocol, the only security question that actually matters is who can mint, and how hard is it for someone to take that power from them.
If the answer is “a multisig with a timelock, a mint cap, and a lending market that checks where new collateral came from,” you have a real protocol. If the answer is “one wallet with one key,” you have $254M sitting there waiting to be taken. Echo was the second kind.
The damage doesn’t stay in one place either. Aave wasn’t hacked in April, but it lost $5.4B in TVL within 48 hours of the KelpDAO exploit anyway. People just panicked and pulled their money out of everything. That’s what happens now. One protocol gets hit and the whole sector gets repriced.
The fixes are not new. They’ve been around for years. Multisig the admin, timelock the changes, cap the supply, check the collateral. It’s just that none of it makes a protocol more competitive on the front end, so nobody ships it until they’re the next headline.
Echo got off easy because Monad’s liquidity was too thin for the attacker to fully cash out. The next protocol probably won’t have that excuse.
The post Echo Protocol Hack Autopsy: The $76 Million Exploit That Wasn’t Really a Hack appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Prometheum says tokenized securities need Wall Street distribution to scale
Prometheum is betting that the next phase of tokenized finance will be won not by crypto exchanges, but by traditional broker-dealers and registered investment advisers (RIAs).
“The story of tokenization so far has been about issuance, but no one has addressed the challenge of how to get those products to mainstream investors,” Aaron Kaplan, co-founder and co-CEO of Prometheum told CoinDesk in an interview.
“Until tokenized and digitally-native securities can reach investors through the broker-dealer channels they already use, tokenization is a solution without a market,” he added.
Tokenized securities are traditional financial assets such as stocks, bonds or funds that are issued and traded on blockchain networks as digital tokens representing ownership or investment rights.
The New York-based digital asset infrastructure firm recently launched Prometheum Capital’s Digital Brokerage Solutions, a suite of correspondent clearing, custody and trading services designed to let broker-dealers offer crypto assets, including tokenized securities and other blockchain-based financial products, directly through traditional brokerage accounts.
The launch marks Prometheum’s latest attempt to bridge the gap between the crypto industry and the regulated securities ecosystem.
“Crypto has solved tokenization, but it hasn’t solved distribution,” Kaplan says. “There are tens of billions of dollars of tokenized securities already issued on blockchain rails, but almost no mainstream distribution channel to reach investors at scale.”
Prometheum operates a network of SEC-registered and FINRA-member broker-dealers designed to support the full lifecycle of blockchain-based securities, including issuance, trading, custody, clearing and settlement.
The company positions itself as a bridge between traditional financial markets and digital assets, offering regulated infrastructure for tokenized securities, crypto assets and onchain financial products through existing brokerage and securities law frameworks.
It operates a network of regulated entities spanning the digital asset lifecycle, including a transfer agent, broker-dealer, alternative trading system (ATS), custody platform and correspondent clearing infrastructure. Kaplan described the firm’s clearing-enabled custodian as its “special sauce.”
Prometheum joined the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) Industry Working Group in May as one of more than 50 financial firms helping shape the development of the Depository Trust Company’s (DTC’s) tokenization service.
Building a distribution flywheel
The company says its platform serves two primary functions: helping issuers distribute tokenized securities into the broader financial system and enabling traditional broker-dealers to build digital asset businesses without relying on crypto-native exchanges.
That creates what Kaplan calls a “flywheel effect,” connecting issuers with institutional distribution channels while giving traditional financial firms access to the growing market for blockchain-based assets.
Prometheum’s inaugural correspondent clearing clients include Arete Wealth Management, Network 1 Financial Securities and an unnamed clearing broker-dealer, according to a company statement.
Kaplan says the broader opportunity lies in opening the broker-dealer and RIA channel, long the dominant distribution network for traditional securities, to digital assets.
“The broker-dealer channel is how you reach investors at scale,” he says. “Now, for the first time, broker-dealers and RIAs can offer digital assets directly through their existing account structures and compete with crypto trading venues on a more level playing field.”
Competing with crypto platforms under securities rules
Prometheum argues that traditional securities firms have largely been sidelined during crypto’s rise because many digital asset platforms operated outside conventional securities regulation. By bringing blockchain-based assets into a regulated broker-dealer framework, Kaplan says firms can compete while maintaining investor protections such as asset segregation, custody controls and compliance oversight.
“It’s a tried-and-proven regulatory structure that has allowed investors to thrive for generations,” Kaplan says. “Now it can support digital assets as well.”
The company is positioning itself around the idea that the future of securities markets will ultimately move onchain. Kaplan points to growing industry projections that tokenized real-world assets (RWA) could become a major segment of capital markets over the next decade.
“The future of securities is onchain,” he says. “As these products become better, faster and cheaper, broker-dealers are going to need the infrastructure to compete and offer them to clients.”
More broker-dealers and RIAs expected to join
Prometheum says additional broker-dealers and RIAs are expected to onboard in the coming months as demand grows for regulated digital asset infrastructure. Kaplan also teased an upcoming institutional distribution partnership that he says will help attract larger issuers into the ecosystem.
The broader thesis reflects a shift underway across the digital asset industry, where firms are increasingly focused less on token creation and more on integrating blockchain-based assets into existing financial distribution networks.
For Prometheum, the bet is that tokenization alone is not enough. Without Wall Street’s distribution machinery, digital securities risk remaining a niche product despite the technology’s promise.
According to Kaplan, “integrating blockchain into capital markets isn’t about replacing the system, it’s about modernizing it so that issuers, broker-dealers, and investors all benefit from faster settlement, broader access, and more efficient distribution of investment products.”
“Realizing those benefits at scale depends on infrastructure that can move onchain products through the channels investors and advisors already use, and that is what Prometheum has built,” he added.
Crypto World
Nvidia faces $100 billion compensation crisis, BTC/XRP could be at risk of another drop
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Nvidia compensation concerns shake crypto markets as platforms like XRPPower highlight AI-driven risk management tools.
Summary
- Reports around a potential Nvidia compensation crisis have fueled volatility across global tech and crypto markets.
- XRPPower is highlighting its AI-driven security systems, including AML checks, 2FA, and real-time risk monitoring.
- The platform says it follows standards such as ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and GDPR to strengthen user protection.
Recently, news of Nvidia potentially facing a $100 billion compensation crisis has caused significant volatility in global financial and cryptocurrency markets. As one of the most watched companies in the AI and technology sectors, Nvidia’s news has quickly raised concerns among investors about market liquidity, the risks of tech stocks, and the performance of mainstream crypto assets like BTC and XRP.
While the compensation news is still pending confirmation, market risk aversion has already begun to rise. Some investors worry that significant fluctuations in the global technology market could further impact the price performance of crypto assets like Bitcoin and XRP.
Amidst increasing market uncertainty, more and more users are refocusing on the security and risk control capabilities of digital asset platforms. XRPPower, combining an AI-powered intelligent risk identification system, real-time anomaly monitoring, and multi-layered security mechanisms, continuously strives to create a more stable, secure, and transparent digital ecosystem service experience for users, helping them manage digital asset risks more efficiently in complex market environments.
XRPPower’s advantages and security combining AI intelligence
1. XRPPower continuously strengthens its AI-powered intelligent security system, strictly adhering to international security standards such as ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and GDPR to continuously improve user data security, account protection, and privacy management capabilities.
2. The platform introduces an AI-powered intelligent risk identification system, combined with AML anti-money laundering mechanisms and 2FA two-factor authentication, continuously optimizing platform risk control and account security capabilities through a multi-layered security protection system.
3. Furthermore, XRPPower combines real-time anomaly monitoring, multi-layered encryption technology, and AI intelligent algorithms to further enhance platform security, transaction transparency, and risk protection capabilities, providing users with a more stable and reliable digital asset service experience.
4. With the rapid development of AI automation and digital finance, XRPPower will continue to drive upgrades to intelligent technologies and security systems, committed to building a more transparent, secure, and efficient global digital asset ecosystem platform.
In the era of AI automation, XRPPower opens up new options for smart income.
1. Quickly create an XRPPower account using an email address to easily access the platform and start an AI-powered smart income experience.
2. Freely choose the income period and smart contract plan that suits an individual’s needs.
3. After completing the contract fee payment, the system will automatically launch the smart income contract and begin operation.
4. Daily earnings will be automatically credited to the account balance. Users can withdraw funds at any time or continue to purchase other smart income contracts, achieving a more flexible asset management experience.
Selected AI profit contracts
Contract Name: Dogecoin [AI Smart Quantitative] Investment Amount: $5,000, Term: 15 days, Daily Yield: $70.50, Total Profit: $1,050.50, Principal Return at Maturity: $5,000
Contract Name: Bitcoin/Bitcoin Cash [AI Global Smart Ecosystem] Investment Amount: $25,000, Term: 23 days, Daily Yield: $417.50, Total Profit: $9,602.50, Principal Return at Maturity: $25,000
Click to view more details on AI contract cycle yields
About XRPPower
Currently, XRPPower has established a digital ecosystem network covering 189 countries and regions worldwide, with over 3 million global users. Through its AI-powered smart app and continuously upgraded digital service system, the platform continuously enhances the user’s intelligent experience and ecosystem service capabilities.
In the future, XRPPower will continue to optimize and upgrade its AI intelligent technology, global ecosystem layout, and transparent operation system to create a more stable and efficient digital service platform for global users.
For details, please visit the official website or download the Android and iOS smart apps.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Crypto World
Three Dividend Champions for 2026: Coca-Cola (KO), Philip Morris (PM), and Costco (COST) Lead the Pack
Key Takeaways
- Three consumer giants—Costco, Philip Morris, and Coca-Cola—emerge as compelling dividend holdings for extended investment horizons
- Coca-Cola shares touched a 52-week peak at $82.62 following Citigroup’s upgraded price target of $91
- The beverage leader delivered Q1 2026 earnings of $0.86 per share, surpassing projections, while revenue jumped 11.4% annually
- Philip Morris now generates 41.5% of total net revenue from next-generation nicotine alternatives including Iqos and Zyn
- Coca-Cola boasts 64 consecutive years of dividend increases; Philip Morris has boosted payouts annually since its 2008 spinoff
Market analysts and investment strategists are spotlighting three consumer sector leaders—Costco Wholesale, Philip Morris International, and Coca-Cola—as compelling dividend opportunities for patient investors. These companies share a common thread: proven business models and consistent shareholder distributions that have withstood market cycles.
Let’s examine what sets each of these dividend payers apart in today’s investment landscape.
Costco Wholesale
Costco operates a distinctive warehouse club format centered on annual membership subscriptions. These membership revenues form the backbone of the company’s profitability, enabling the retailer to operate on razor-thin product margins while still delivering impressive bottom-line results. The approach resonates particularly with affluent consumers seeking value through bulk purchasing.
Costco Wholesale Corporation, COST
The retailer allocates zero dollars to traditional advertising campaigns. Instead, a devoted customer base—cultivated partly through beloved staples like the iconic $1.50 hot dog combo—fuels organic growth and word-of-mouth expansion.
Costco distributes regular quarterly dividends and occasionally surprises shareholders with substantial special distributions. The equity has substantially outpaced S&P 500 returns historically, though past performance offers no promises about future outcomes.
Leadership drives expansion through strategic store rollouts, comparable sales growth, and carefully timed adjustments to membership pricing.
Philip Morris International
Philip Morris stands as the globe’s largest international tobacco corporation measured by revenue. The company markets Marlboro cigarettes across international markets and has been methodically repositioning toward reduced-risk alternatives.
Philip Morris International Inc., PM
Innovative offerings such as Iqos—a heated tobacco system—and Zyn nicotine pouches now represent 41.5% of consolidated net revenues as of 2025 figures. Management projects these categories will ultimately supplant the traditional combustible tobacco segment as it continues its gradual decline.
While conventional cigarette unit sales experience steady erosion, company executives indicate that Iqos expansion more than compensates for those losses. Following its 2008 separation from Altria Group, Philip Morris has delivered uninterrupted annual dividend growth.
The current dividend yield hovers around 3% at prevailing market prices. This combination of yield and robust cash flow generation keeps the stock firmly on income-focused investors’ radar screens.
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola recently achieved a 52-week pinnacle of $82.62 after Citigroup elevated its valuation target from $90 to $91 while maintaining a buy recommendation. Jefferies lifted its objective to $90. Barclays and JPMorgan each adjusted their targets to $85. Morgan Stanley maintains an $88 forecast.
Collectively, 15 sell-side analysts assign buy ratings to the shares, with a median price objective of $86.53 based on MarketBeat compilation.
The beverage giant posted first-quarter 2026 earnings of $0.86 per share, exceeding the Street consensus of $0.81. Quarterly revenues reached $12.47 billion, topping the $12.24 billion projection and representing an 11.4% year-over-year advance.
Full-year 2025 net earnings climbed 23% to $13.1 billion. Annual revenue for that period totaled just under $48.4 billion, compared with $38.7 billion in 2020.
Shareholder Returns and Forward Outlook
Coca-Cola announced a quarterly distribution of $0.53 per share, scheduled for July 1 payment to investors of record as of June 15. The annualized payout of $2.12 translates to approximately 2.6% yield, substantially exceeding the S&P 500’s average of 1.1%.
The corporation has now delivered 64 consecutive annual dividend increases, cementing its status among the elite Dividend Kings. Market observers highlight the 2026 FIFA World Cup as a meaningful catalyst for beverage consumption this summer. The rollout of Fresca Hard further diversifies the company’s alcoholic ready-to-drink portfolio.
Coca-Cola established full-year 2026 earnings per share guidance spanning $3.24 to $3.27. The analyst consensus currently projects $3.26 for the complete fiscal year.
Crypto World
3 Meme Coins to Watch During the Final Week of May
Banana For Scale (BANANAS31), Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), and SkyAI (SKYAI) sit at decisive technical levels this week. Each daily chart presents a distinct setup that traders may want to track as meme coin volatility returns.
The wider meme coin sector remains highly active in 2026, with traders treating these tokens as high-beta vehicles relative to Bitcoin. Mixed signals across the three charts point to a sector still searching for clear direction.
Banana For Scale (BANANAS31) Eyes $0.014 Resistance Breakout
Banana For Scale (BANANAS31) trades around $0.0122 on Monday, up roughly 5% over 24 hours. The daily chart shows price moving inside an ascending channel since early May.
The lower boundary sits at $0.0092, which lines up with the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement. Resistance at $0.014 has been tested three times without a clean break, and another attempt may finally crack the meme coin ceiling.
A close above $0.014 could open a path toward the recent swing high near $0.0163. However, a drop below $0.0092 would expose the next strong support at $0.0052, which coincides with the 0.786 retracement.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits at 52, signaling neutral momentum. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remains bearish, although the histogram suggests bulls are slowly regaining the upper hand.
Meme Coins to Watch: SkyAI (SKYAI) Validates $0.24 as Key Support
SkyAI (SKYAI) trades around $0.337 on Monday after gaining roughly 3% over the past day. The daily chart shows a sharp decline from the May 6 high near $0.86.
During the selloff, the token lost two important supports. The 0.382 Fibonacci level at $0.56 and the 0.618 level at $0.37 now act as resistance, capping any early recovery attempts from this AI altcoin.
In contrast, buyers have validated the 0.786 retracement at $0.24 as fresh support. That same level previously capped price action as resistance on April 23, adding weight to its role as a pivot.
The RSI prints in neutral territory near 50. However, the MACD is trying to turn bullish, hinting at a possible return of upside momentum if buyers can defend the lower zone.
Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Tests Ascending Support Line
Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) trades around $0.009 on Monday after a 1.4% pullback over the last 24 hours. The token recently bounced off the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement at $0.0085.
However, PENGU has lost the 0.5 retracement at $0.0095, which now caps the price as resistance. Bulls must reclaim that level to extend the recent rally toward higher targets.
At the same time, price keeps bouncing off the ascending support line that started at the April 5 low. The next target sits just above the 0.618 retracement near $0.011, with the $0.013 zone marking the level beyond.
Like the other two tokens, the RSI prints near 50, pointing to neutral momentum. The MACD is also turning bullish, hinting at improving conditions for buyers in the short term.
Which Meme Coin Offers the Strongest Setup This Week
Among the three, BANANAS31 presents the cleanest bullish structure. The token has tested $0.014 three times, and a break above that level could trigger a sharp move toward the May high. Compared to last week’s setups, BANANAS31 stands out as the most actionable name on the daily timeframe.
SKYAI remains in a confirmed downtrend, although the bullish MACD shift hints at a possible mean reversion. Traders may want to wait for a close above $0.37 before treating the recovery as confirmed.
PENGU sits at a decision point. The token holds the ascending trendline, yet the loss of $0.0095 leaves it exposed. A reclaim of that level would tilt the balance back to the bulls.
For traders ranking these setups by clarity, BANANAS31 leads, PENGU sits in the middle, and SKYAI brings up the rear until the downtrend breaks.
The post 3 Meme Coins to Watch During the Final Week of May appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
On-Chain Demand Falls to 2026 Lows; Bitcoin Could Test $72K
Bitcoin (BTC) has slipped about 6.5% from a recent peak that briefly topped $82,000, as a confluence of bearish technical signals, waning demand and rising selling pressure clouds the short-term outlook. Traders and analysts say the pullback comes after BTC failed to sustain momentum beyond the key level near $82k, with price action trapped within a price channel that has guided moves since February.
Key takeaways:
- BTC faces a risk of sliding toward $72,000 as momentum remains negative on higher timeframes.
- BTC inflows into Binance have risen for multiple consecutive days, signaling mounting selling pressure and cooling investor confidence.
- Bitcoin’s apparent demand has weakened to its 2026 lows, suggesting downside risk unless spot demand recovers in the coming weeks.
Bearish setup tightens around key levels
Analysts note that Bitcoin’s failure to hold above crucial support levels points to difficulty in sustaining an upturn. As one observer put it, BTC has “officially lost the 100 and 50-day EMA,” signaling that the local market structure has shifted back toward a bearish configuration. The broader commentary emphasizes that macro conditions have deteriorated, helping to sap momentum and leaving any bounce unconfirmed as of now.
The rejection at the $82,000 zone aligns with the upper boundary of an ascending parallel channel that has defined price action since early in the year. Historical patterns suggest that each time BTC hits this trend line and fails to penetrate it, the price has tended to pull back meaningfully, often to the channel’s lower boundary. If that dynamic repeats, a target near $72,000—roughly 13% below the upper boundary—remains on the near-term radar, with the lower edge providing a potential support zone around that level.
Several prominent voices highlighted the risk. One analyst noted that the market’s impulse faded as macro conditions worsened, describing the current environment as risk-off and remarking that every bounce needs additional confirmation. Another trader pointed to a pattern where losses can accelerate if key support fails to hold, underscoring the potential for renewed downside toward the mid-$70,000s and below.
Beyond the price channel, a broader view places emphasis on the importance of a critical zone around $75,000–$76,000. According to market participants, losing this neighborhood could open the door to a test of the next defensive levels at approximately $74,000 and $71,400, with some forecasting the possibility of revisiting the 2026 lows around $60,000 if downside pressure intensifies and selling accelerates.
There is also a contingent view that a renewed push above the $80,000 mark could occur if geopolitical headlines shift quickly and a “peaceful” development emerges in the Middle East. Such a narrative would be a stark contrast to the current risk-off mood but remains contingent on fresh catalysts and observer sentiment.
Demand signals point to a tougher road for a durable rally
Bitcoin’s demand signals have deteriorated as on-chain metrics align with a more cautious stance among market participants. The risk index tracked by Swissblock recently re-entered a “high-risk” territory, a sign that selling pressure is increasingly challenging to absorb, though it does not by itself confirm a breakdown. The takeaway for traders is that a sustained rally would require stronger immediate demand to absorb supply at current and near-term price levels.
Demand dynamics are further echoed by exchange flow data. Net BTC inflows into Binance have persisted for nearly a week, with the weekly average rising to around 1,190 BTC from roughly 378 BTC just two weeks earlier. CryptoQuant analysts caution that persistent inflows can be interpreted as a seller-ready signal—advancing the notion that holders may be transferring BTC to exchanges in preparation for profit-taking, reducing exposure, or repositioning portfolios in a risk-off environment.
On-chain demand metrics show a more sobering picture. BTC’s apparent demand has hovered around negative territory, roughly -147,000 BTC, marking its weakest reading since late 2025. Analysts note that such a deterioration in demand, if not offset by a meaningful rebound in spot buying, makes a durable rally harder to sustain. As one strategist observed, the absence of a strong demand recovery in the spot market complicates the possibility of a sustainable upside breakout.
These patterns come amid ongoing discussions about external demand drivers, including the broader ETF landscape. In recent coverage, Cointelegraph highlighted that weakness in spot demand, combined with rising ETF outflows, compounds the risk of prolonged consolidation or a slide toward the mid-$60,000s in a downside scenario. While ETF flows can shift rapidly with new product launches or regulatory developments, the current trajectory adds a layer of caution for bulls hoping for a swift, durable revival.
What investors should watch next
The immediate line in the sand remains the $75,000–$76,000 region. A daily close below that zone keeps the risk of a deeper pullback intact, potentially inviting a test of the channel’s lower boundary near $72,000 and even lower if selling accelerates. Conversely, a sustained hold above the zone could set the stage for a cautious re-entry into bulls’ territory, though confirmation would likely require a combination of firmer demand signals and a respite in exchange inflows.
Analysts are also watching how macro news and geopolitical developments might tilt the balance. A major complicating factor is the potential influence of external events on risk appetite, which can either reinforce the current bearish tilt or catalyze a renewed bout of buying if headlines shift favorably and liquidity conditions improve.
In the near term, traders should be prepared for continued volatility as BTC negotiates the crosscurrents of technical resistance, fading on-chain demand and persistent exchange flows. The balance of risk is skewed toward downside unless a meaningful demand pickup materializes and sellers step back from the market.
What happens next will hinge on a mix of price action around the key support and resistance levels, the evolution of on-chain demand, and the trajectory of exchange inflows. As always in crypto markets, the landscape can shift quickly—making close attention to the unfolding data essential for readers navigating this evolving chapter of Bitcoin’s price journey.
Readers should stay tuned for any shift in the demand picture, a decisive move at or above the $76,000 level, or a reduction in exchange selling pressure, as these variables will likely dictate whether BTC can sustain a meaningful recovery or extend its consolidation in the coming weeks.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Risks 7% Dip to $72K as BTC Demand Weakens and Bears Return
Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen 6.5% from its recent high above $82,000, as a bearish technical structure, weakening demand, and increasing sell pressure now point to the risk of further losses ahead.
Key takeaways:
- BTC price risks a drop toward $72,000 as bearish momentum strengthens on higher time frames.
- Binance BTC inflows tripled in under two weeks, signaling rising sell pressure and weaker investor confidence in the market.
- Bitcoin’s apparent demand fell to 2026 lows, raising risks of deeper losses if spot demand fails to recover in the coming weeks.
Bitcoin bears eye BTC price drop to $72,000
Bitcoin’s failure to hold above key support levels suggested buyers were unable to sustain the upward momentum.
“$BTC has officially lost the 100 & 50d EMA,” analyst CryptoJelleNL said in a recent post on X, adding:
“The local market structure is back to bearish.”
“Bitcoin lost its bullish impulse exactly when macro sharply deteriorated,” fellow analyst Axel Adler Jr said in a Sunday X post, adding:
“The market looks risk-off, and every BTC bounce remains unconfirmed.”
The rejection at $82,000 coincided with the upper trend line of an ascending parallel channel, which has capped BTC’s price action since early February.
The chart below shows that every time the price has been rejected from this trend line, it has lost between 11%-14% of its value, dropping toward the lower support trend line.
If this price behaviour continues, Bitcoin will fall toward the lower boundary of the channel at $72,000, which is 13% below the upper boundary and a 7% drop from the current price.

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
Meanwhile, the relative strength index has dropped to 48 from near overbought conditions at 69 on May 6, suggesting increasing downward momentum.
“Bitcoin briefly dipped as low as $74.1K, sweeping the May VCPR liquidity zone before seeing a quick reaction,” trader and analyst Anup Dhungana said in his latest analysis on X, adding:
“Losing this support area could send $BTC swiftly back toward the $70K region, while holding it keeps the door open for another recovery attempt.”
MN Capital founder Michael van de Poppe shared a chart showing that if the “crucial” support zone between $75,000 and $76,000 is lost, the price could retreat toward the next lines of defense at $74,000 and $71,400, before potentially retesting the 2026 lows at $60,000.
On the other hand, Van de Poppe said BTC/USD could break to “higher grounds” above $80,000 if “there’s going to be a peace deal in the Middle East” in the coming days.

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: X/Michael van de Poppe
As Cointelegraph reported, the $76,000 level is the critical level to watch, as a close below it would increase the risk of a drop to the multi-month support line around $72,000.
Bitcoin apparent demand hits 2026 lows
Bitcoin’s “warning is flashing” after its Risk Index re-entered “high-risk” territory, according to private wealth manager Swissblock.
“That doesn’t confirm breakdown yet,” Swissblock said in a recent X post, adding:
“But it confirms that selling pressure is no longer being fully absorbed.”

Bitcoin risk index. Source: Swissblock
That high-risk signal also aligns with increasing selling pressure on exchanges, with Binance recording nearly 10 straight days of net BTC inflows. The weekly average inflows rose to 1,190 BTC from 378 BTC on May 16, marking a more than threefold increase in less than two weeks.
“When inflows become dominant and consistent on a platform like Binance, this is traditionally interpreted as a potential sell signal,” CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost said in a QuickTake note on Monday, adding:
“Holders transferring their BTC to an exchange most often do so with the intent to sell, whether it be profit taking, reducing exposure, or a more defensive repositioning.”

Binance exchange’s Bitcoin net flow. Source: CryptoQuant
Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s apparent demand has fallen to around -147,000 BTC, its most negative level since the start of the year and the weakest reading since December 2025.
“This development suggests that demand continues to gradually contract,” Darkfost said in an X post on Sunday, adding:
“Without a meaningful recovery in spot demand, it becomes difficult to imagine Bitcoin sustaining a durable rally.”

Bitcoin’s apparent demand. Source: CryptoQuant
The last time this metric was this low was in December 2025, before another 33% drop to multi-year lows below $60,000 was reached on Feb. 6.
As Cointelegraph reported, Bitcoin’s weakening demand and increasing spot ETF outflows have raised the risk of prolonged consolidation or a drop toward $65,000 in the short to medium term.
-
Crypto World4 days agoBlockchain.com files with SEC for U.S. IPO
-
Fashion3 days agoHoliday Weekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World3 days agoBitcoin Accumulation Weakens as BTC Realized Losses Hit $600M
-
Business3 days agoDell Technologies DELL Stock Surges 15% on AI Server Momentum and Analyst Upgrades in 2026
-
Crypto World3 days agoSpace X IPO Is ‘Bad News’ for Tech Stocks: But What About Bitcoin?
-
Politics3 days agoMakerfield: a tale of two social-media histories
-
Crypto World2 days agoRobinhood crypto COO Tanya Denisova exits
-
Crypto World3 days agoMicroStrategy’s Saylor Says Miners No Longer Set Bitcoin Price, Another Force Has Taken Over
-
Business21 hours agoNYT Strands Answers May 24 2026 Revealed for Puzzle No. 812 Theme Summer Essentials
-
Tech3 days agoA 0.12% parameter add-on gives AI agents the working memory RAG can’t
-
Crypto World3 days agoAI infrastructure race heats up as IREN pitches full-stack strategy, WhiteFiber lands $160M deal
-
Tech4 days agoWhatsApp ads could make Irish debut after discussions with DPC
-
Tech4 days agoYou Can Now Add ChatGPT To PowerPoint
-
Business3 days agoTrump Invests $1M-$5M in Kura Sushi USA Chain With 27 California Locations
-
Crypto World7 days agoRevolut Launches Dogecoin Debit Card Across UK and EU
-
NewsBeat4 days agoCharity run by Reform leader Malcolm Offord accused of ‘law breaking’ over Scottish registration
-
Sports4 days ago2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson leaderboard: Brooks Koepka finds putting stroke in Round 1
-
Crypto World3 days agoTrump Media’s Bitcoin Stash Shrinks Again as 2,650 BTC Lands on Crypto.com
-
Business3 days ago
Goldman Sachs reinstates Ageas stock coverage with neutral rating
-
Crypto World5 days agoExa Labs raises $250 million in funding led by a16z


You must be logged in to post a comment Login