Scottish Labour warned the Peter Murrell scandal was “not story of domestic deception that can be brushed under the carpet”.
Tearful Nicola Sturgeon has flatly denied any knowledge or responsibility for Peter Murrell’s crimes – and claimed she couldn’t have seen his most infamous purchase as part of a £400,000 embezzlement as it was parked “round the side of the house”.
The defiant former first minister used a set-piece interview with the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg today to refuse to apologise for the failure to stop the party being fleeced by its own chief executive for more than 10 years.
Sturgeon, SNP leader until 2023, had a responsibility to sign-off the annual accounts during a time Murrell was routinely using members’ donations to buy a string of luxury purchases including an £80,000 Jaguar car, a £100,000 motorhome and a £3,000 lawnmower.
Speaking in her first interview since her estranged husband’s guilty plea, the ex-MSP claimed she felt like she had been “sentenced for a crime I did not commit”.
She added: “I am not responsible for the crimes that my former husband committed and I’m not going to apologise for somebody else’s crimes.”
Sturgeon also refused to accept internal whistleblowers were blocked from trying to raise issues with the party’s accounts in the early 2020s.
But opposition parties warned the Murrell scandal would not disappear through “carefully managed interviews” as calls grow for a parliamentary inquiry into the affair.
Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour deputy leader, said: “I have no doubt that the tears Nicola Sturgeon has shed over her own predicament are genuine, but this interview leaves the public with more questions than answers.
“But this isn’t a story of domestic deception that can be brushed under the carpet – at the height of this scandal it was Nicola Sturgeon who attempted to shame senior party figures demanding answers into silence.
“As First Minister and leader of the SNP, she was ultimately responsible for signing off the party accounts in which Peter Murrell concealed his vast embezzlement.
“For years Nicola Sturgeon cultivated an image of being a leader who missed nothing and was across every detail.
“Now she asks the public to believe she had neither knowledge of nor curiosity about how these luxury purchases were being funded.
“While Nicola Sturgeon feels sorry for herself, my sympathy lies with the people of Scotland and SNP members who were deceived.
“They placed their trust in the SNP leadership and have every right to feel let down by a party that has become synonymous with secrecy, evasion and unanswered questions.
“This scandal will not disappear through carefully managed interviews. Nicola Sturgeon, John Swinney and the SNP must finally come clean to a parliamentary inquiry that can get the answers Scotland deserves.”
Russell Findlay, Scottish Conservatives leader, said: “If this was Nicola Sturgeon’s attempt to shut down scrutiny then her wholly unconvincing performance failed on all counts.
“She failed to provide credible answers about her infamous police ‘no comment’ interview or about her aggressive attempts to shut down legitimate concerns about the SNP’s finances.
“Her inability to suspect anything untoward about her husband’s rampant spending that bankrolled a luxury campervan, a Jaguar and her lavish lifestyle also lacks credibility.
“I repeat my party’s call for the Crown Office to publish the reasons why no charges were brought against Nicola Sturgeon, and whether that decision was consistent with that of Police Scotland. There must also be a parliamentary inquiry to be held into this epic SNP scandal.”
The former SNP leader also denied any knowledge of the now notorious motorhome Murrell purchased for more than £100,000. The vehicle spent more than two years sat outside the home of his mother’s suburban home in Dunfermline.
Kuenssberg asked the former FM: “There’s one item in particular – a motorhome worth more than £100,000. That motorhome was parked in your mother-in-law’s drive for a long time. And yet yo say you know nothing about it. Did you visit your mother-in-law’s house in that period?”
Sturgeon replied: “Less than a handful of times, probably.”
Kuenssberg added: “So you walked past that motorhome?”
Sturgeon continued: “No, I didn’t. And this is the thing… my mother-in-law’s house has a driveway in front of the house where we would park our car, and then we would go into the house. Where the motorhome was, was round the side of the house. Which is not immediately visible in the way we went into the house, and it’s between the house and the next door neighbour’s house.
“I genuinely have no conscious memory of seeing that motorhome. If I saw it, I would probably have assumed it was the neighbours. My mother and father-in-law were in their mid-80s. It wouldn’t have crossed my mind that it was theirs… and why would it have crossed my mind it was the SNP’s, that Peter had bought it?”


You must be logged in to post a comment Login