Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Crypto News, Prices & Indexes

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin and Ethereum led a broad rally in risk assets as traders priced in cooling inflation and firmer macro signals, but the rebound for Ether came with a caveat: derivatives markets remained largely cautious. The on-chain picture shows a liquidity landscape that is still hunting for clear catalysts, even as Ether clears key price resistances. In short, a positive price move does not yet translate into a confident shift in momentum, with traders continuing to weigh the risk of another leg lower as macro headlines evolve.

Key takeaways

  • Ethereum maintains dominance in total value locked (TVL), but scrutiny of layer-2 scaling and its subsidy model persists as investors assess long-term efficiency.
  • Ether’s inflation metric rose to ~0.8% over the last 30 days as on-chain activity cooled, while macro concerns kept derivatives in a cautious, risk-off stance.
  • ETH 2‑month futures traded at roughly a 3% premium to spot, below the 5% neutral threshold, signaling tepid optimism from Ether traders despite the rally.
  • Year-to-date, Ether has underperformed the broader crypto market by about 9%, raising questions about where capital is flowing and how much is staying tethered to Ethereum’s core ecosystem.
  • Deposits on the Ethereum base layer account for roughly 58% of the entire blockchain industry; including Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism, that figure rises to about 65%. The largest DApp on the Ethereum base layer holds more than $23 billion in TVL, underscoring Ethereum’s ongoing scale advantage over competitors like Solana, where the top DApp’s TVL remains far smaller.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH

Sentiment: Bearish

Price impact: Positive. Ether reclaimed the $2,100 level as the broader market rose, but the bounce remains tentative amid persistent risk-off signals in the derivatives space.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The current price recovery lacks clear, durable conviction from buyers, and any sustained advance will depend on a shift in risk appetite and improved on-chain activity.

Advertisement

Market context: The price move comes within a broader environment of liquidity fluctuations and macro uncertainty, where flows into crypto often track traditional risk indicators and regulatory chatter as much as technical levels.

Why it matters

The Ethereum ecosystem remains the cornerstone of DeFi and NFT activity, with the base layer continuing to attract the majority of on-chain value. Even as the chain holds a commanding TVL lead, the narrative around layer-2 solutions—how they decentralize, secure, and scale applications—has grown more nuanced. Ethereum’s current stance reflects a tension between the heavy usage that has historically fueled its dynamics and the structural questions about how best to sustain growth without compromising security or centralizing risk through bridges or trusted constructs.

Data from ultrasound.money shows Ether’s supply growth accelerating to about 0.8% on an annualized basis over the last month, a sign that the burn dynamics intended to counter inflation are not as punitive as hoped when network demand softens. The built-in burn mechanism relies on base-layer data processing activity; when that activity wanes, the net effect can be a modest supply expansion, tempering the deflationary narrative some bulls have pushed. This dynamic aligns with the observed softness in on-chain activity and the tepid appetite in the derivatives market, where a 3% premium for 2‑month Ether futures sits below the 5% neutral threshold—an indication that traders are not aggressively pricing in rapid upside (Laevitas data: laevitas.ch).

On the fundamental side, the ladder of TVL metrics continues to illustrate Ethereum’s centrality. The Ethereum base layer alone accounts for the majority of blockchain deposits, while including the leading layer-2 ecosystems—Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism—pushes the share to well above two-thirds of industry activity. In contrast, Solana’s leading DApp sits far behind, a reminder that capital has not yet pursued a broad shift away from Ethereum despite competition. This shape of the market matters for developers evaluating where to build and for investors weighing the durability of Ethereum’s moat in a multi-chain era.

Advertisement

The pace of adoption in layer-2 networks is another focal point. Vitalik Buterin has argued that the L2 path to decentralization has proven more challenging than originally envisioned, given reliance on multisig-controlled bridges and security trade-offs. In interviews and analyses, he has signaled a pivot toward base-layer scalability while acknowledging that privacy-focused features and application-specific designs on L2s will continue to influence capital allocation patterns. The inherent tension between scalability and security is central to investors’ risk calculus as they parse long-term returns from layer-1 vs. layer-2 deployments. For context, related discussions emphasize the difference between “real DeFi” and centralized yield constructs, underscoring how policy choices and technology design shape the sustainable value proposition of Ethereum’s ecosystem (Vitalik Buterin commentary: Ethereum scaling pivot).

Another facet of the narrative is the relationship between price performance and liquidity provision. Ether’s price recovery has not yet translated into a broad-based rally in the derivatives market, where risk-off sentiment remains visible in pricing and open interest. While the disappearance of a rapid down-leg is a relief for holders, the absence of robust upside pressure suggests traders remain cautious, watching macro data and regulatory signals for any signs that capital will pivot back toward higher-yield opportunities. In this context, the chart of Ether against the overall crypto capitalization illustrates a persistent lag, with Ether’s performance this year lagging the broader market by roughly 9% as capital rotates among competing use cases and networks (TradingView: ETH/USD vs. total crypto capitalization).

Finally, the market’s attention remains split between long-term fundamental deployments and near-term price movements. The burn mechanism’s trajectory depends on on-chain activity, while the composition of TVL—especially the share captured by L2s—will influence how investors perceive Ethereum’s ability to sustain network effects. The ongoing debate about L2 security, decentralization, and throughput feeds into price dynamics and shapes the risk-reward calculus for traders and developers alike. As developers experiment with privacy-focused features and bespoke, application-specific layer designs, Ethereum’s scale narrative remains central to the crypto economy’s evolution, even as other chains strive to carve out niche advantages.

What to watch next

  • Monitor Ether’s price action around the $2,200 area and whether buying pressure gains enough momentum to sustain a breakout.
  • Track Vitalik Buterin’s public comments and any policy shifts from major layer-2 projects regarding decentralization and security architecture.
  • Observe on-chain activity metrics and the burn rate versus supply growth using ultrasound.money data to gauge deflationary pressure.
  • Watch DefiLlama for TVL movements between the Ethereum base layer and its Layer-2 ecosystem to assess flow shifts across the ecosystem.
  • Keep an eye on macro indicators and central bank signals that influence liquidity and risk sentiment, as these ultimately drive derivative pricing and capital allocation.

Sources & verification

  • ETH price levels and movement relative to the $2,150 threshold and recovery to $2,100+ zones.
  • 2-month Ether futures annualized premium data from Laevitas as a gauge of derivatives sentiment.
  • ETH supply growth metrics (0.8% annualized over the last 30 days) from ultrasound.money.
  • TVL breakdowns and main chain vs. Layer-2 deposits from DefiLlama data.
  • Official commentary by Vitalik Buterin on Layer-2 decentralization and the burn mechanism, including linked analyses.

What the numbers say about the market today

Market breadth has improved modestly as Ether reclaims price levels, yet the path to a sustainable rally remains uncertain. The interplay between layer-2 subsidies, base-layer scalability, and on-chain activity will continue to shape price dynamics and capital flows. Investors are watching for signals that derivatives markets finally align with price action, suggesting a broader willingness to take on risk. Until then, Ether’s leadership in TVL and ongoing L2 development will be essential barometers for the health and direction of the crypto ecosystem.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

U.S. BTC ETFs post first monthly inflows since October

Published

on

ETF AUM (CheckonChain)

U.S.listed spot bitcoin ETFs ended March with $1.32 billion in net inflows to record their first monthly inflows since October, SoSoValue data shows.

This follows four consecutive months of net outflows, which coincided with bitcoin declining by as much as 50% from its October all time high of $126,000.
November saw $3.5 billion in outflows, followed by $1.1 billion in December, $1.6 billion in January, and $206 million in February.

March also marked bitcoin’s first positive monthly candle in six months, suggesting a potential shift in momentum.

ETF assets under management have remained relatively resilient, however. Holdings declined from 1.38 million BTC in October to a low of 1.28 million BTC, a drop of roughly 7%, and have since recovered to around 1.31 million BTC, according to CheckonChain.

Advertisement

ETF investors remain underwater on average, with an estimated cost basis near $84,000 compared to a current spot price of about $68,000.

ETF AUM (CheckonChain)
ETF AUM (CheckonChain)

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Galaxy Digital’s (GLXY) testnet suffers hack but no client funds or information were compromised

Published

on

Galaxy Digital's (GLXY) testnet suffers hack but no client funds or information were compromised

Galaxy Digital (GLXY), the digital asset financial services firm founded by Mike Novogratz, said it recently contained a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to an isolated development workspace, according to a statement from a company spokesperson.

“An immaterial amount of company funds used for testing within the isolated development workspace was impacted,” the spokesperson said in emailed comments. The loss was less than $10,000, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

The firm emphasized that the affected environment was used solely for research and development and was not connected to its core infrastructure, production systems, trading platforms or client accounts.

Galaxy said it detected the intrusion and moved quickly to contain it, secure the compromised workspace and implement additional precautionary measures across its on-chain infrastructure.

Advertisement

“No client funds or client account information were accessed or at risk at any point based on our review to date,” Galaxy said, adding that all platforms and services remain fully operational and secure for clients.

Hacks and exploits remain a persistent risk in the crypto industry, where the combination of open-source code, large pools of onchain liquidity and uneven security practices creates an attractive target for attackers.

Billions of dollars are lost to smart contract exploits, phishing schemes and infrastructure breaches, with industry estimates often exceeding $1–2 billion annually in recent years.

Even when incidents are contained, and client assets are not impacted, breaches can erode trust, trigger heightened regulatory scrutiny and underscore the operational risks facing firms operating in largely irreversible, always-on financial systems.

Advertisement

Galaxy is a diversified financial services and investment firm focused on the digital asset and blockchain sector, providing institutional clients with trading, asset management, lending, advisory and custody services.

The firm operates across several core business lines, including global markets, asset management and digital infrastructure, while also running businesses in areas like crypto mining, staking and data center operations.

Positioned as a bridge between traditional finance and crypto, Galaxy offers institutional-grade access to digital assets and related technologies, alongside investments in blockchain ventures and emerging areas such as AI-powered infrastructure.

The company said it is continuing to review the incident and will provide updates as appropriate.

Advertisement

Read more: Bitcoin’s quantum threat is real, but far from an existential crisis, Galaxy says

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

What Does it Mean for Bitcoin?

Published

on

What Does it Mean for Bitcoin?

Warren Buffett, the legendary investor and chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, revealed on CNBC this week that his firm purchased approximately $17 billion in US Treasury bills at the latest auction. Is a stock market crash coming and what does it mean for Bitcoin (BTC)?

Key takeaways:

  • Berkshire held $373 billion in cash or cash equivalents as of 2025’s close, more than double the levels in 2023.

  • The firm’s rising cash reserves typically precede major stock market crashes, a bad sign for Bitcoin.

Buffett still sees better value in cash than in stocks

Buffett’s message is straightforward: Berkshire does not see the recent equity pullback as a sufficiently attractive buying opportunity.

Advertisement

For context, the S&P 500 has fallen about 5.75% since reaching a record high in January.

S&P 500 weekly performance chart. Source: TradingView

Buffett said stocks are not “substantially” cheaper after the decline and described the sell-off as “nothing” compared with earlier downturns in which markets fell more than 50%.

That helps explain Berkshire’s latest Treasury-bill purchase. The company ended 2025 with about $373 billion in cash and equivalents, up from a record $334.2 billion a year earlier and more than double its level at the end of 2023.

Buffett, who famously called Bitcoin “rat poison,” typically gets into cash before major stock crashes, historical data shows.

In 1998, for instance, Buffett began trimming Berkshire’s stock exposure and raising cash, pushing the company’s cash and cash-equivalents holdings to $13.1 billion, or about 23% of total assets.

Advertisement
Berkshire’s cash and cash-equivalents holdings chart. Source: GuruFocus.COM

By mid-2000, that figure had climbed to nearly $15 billion, or roughly 25% of assets, before Berkshire started deploying capital into bargains as the Dot-com bubble burst.

Bitcoin’s positive correlation with stocks may hurt prices

Bitcoin has traded more like a stock than a traditional safe haven for much of the post-2020 period, often moving in the same direction as US equities, especially the tech-heavy Nasdaq.

As of Wednesday, the 20-week rolling correlation coefficient between the two markets was positive at 0.47.

Nasdaq Composite and BTC/USD’s 20-week correlation coefficient chart. Source: TradingView

If Buffett’s risk-off strategy is correct, then Bitcoin should see another crash alongside stocks. Fresh quantum-security concerns, war-driven inflation risks, and nearly 50% US recession odds are putting pressure on the BTC price.

Berkshire’s portfolio decisions have also leaned away from crypto-adjacent finance.

In the first quarter of 2025, the firm fully exited Nu Holdings, a crypto-friendly fintech company, after building its position in 2021 and 2022. It secured about $250 million in profits from these investments.

Advertisement

Multiple analysts predict BTC’s price to drop to as low as $30,000 in 2026.