Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Sports

Why Iran’s Goal Against Egypt Was Ruled Out For Offside

Published

on

Iran thought they had scored a dramatic late winner against Egypt in their 1-1 draw at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, only for the goal to be ruled out for offside after VAR review.

The decision immediately sparked debate among fans, with many insisting the goal should have stood because an Egyptian defender appeared to be standing close to the goal line.

However, the controversy comes down to one of football’s most misunderstood rules.

Advertisement

Many fans call it the “last man rule,” but that phrase is misleading.

Offside is not judged by the last defender alone. It is judged by the second-last opponent.

Looking At The Still Image

VAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World CupVAR offside review showing Iran’s disallowed late goal against Egypt at the 2026 FIFA World Cup
Still image from VAR review showing the offside call that ruled out Iran’s late goal against Egypt in their 1-1 World Cup draw.

From the replay image, several things stand out:

  • Egypt goalkeeper is way off his line
    This is the key detail because the goalkeeper is not the deepest player near the goal.
  • One Egypt defender is almost on the goal line
    This player appears to be Egypt’s deepest defender and closest player to goal.
  • Another Egypt defender is around the six-yard area
    This player becomes extremely important because VAR likely used him as the second-last defender.
  • The circled Iran player is close to both defenders
    This is where the controversy lies because the Iranian attacker appears very close to the defensive line.

How VAR Likely Judged It

The offside decision likely came down to this logic:

  • Deepest Egypt player
    Defender on the goal line.
  • Second-deepest Egypt player
    Defender near the goalkeeper or middle of the six-yard box.
  • Iran attacker position
    VAR then checked whether the Iranian attacker was ahead of that second-deepest Egyptian player when the ball was played.

If the Iranian attacker was ahead of the second-last Egyptian player, even by a small margin, the goal would be ruled out for offside.

Why Fans Were Confused

Many fans looked at the defender near the goal line and asked:

Advertisement

“There is a defender on the line, so how is that offside?”

But one defender behind the attacker is not enough.

For an attacker to be onside, there must usually be two opposing players between him and the goal line.

In most situations, those two players are:

Advertisement

But in this incident:

  • The goalkeeper was off his line
  • One defender was near the goal line
  • The second defender became the key offside reference point

That means the Iranian attacker needed to be behind the second-deepest Egyptian player, not just the defender standing close to the goal line.

Simple Explanation

The goal is offside if the shape looks like this:

Goal line
Egypt defender
Iran attacker
Second Egypt defender

The goal is onside if the shape looks like this:

Advertisement

Goal line
Egypt defender
Second Egypt defender
Iran attacker

That is the main difference.

Even if the attacker is behind one defender, he can still be offside if he is ahead of the second-last opponent.

Why The Decision Remains Controversial

From the still image alone, this does not look like an obvious offside.

Advertisement

It looks extremely tight.

That means the decision likely came down to three things:

  • Frame timing
    The exact moment the ball was played.
  • Line placement
    Where VAR drew the offside line.
  • Playable body parts
    Shoulder, head, torso and legs count, but arms and hands do not.

Even if the Iranian attacker was ahead by just a shoulder, knee or foot, VAR could rule the goal out.

Iran Coach Reacts

Iran head coach Hossam Hassan was left frustrated by the decision after seeing his side denied what could have been a memorable World Cup winner.

He questioned why VAR was introduced to remove controversies if major decisions continue to divide fans and teams.

Advertisement

Iran had pushed hard for victory, and the disallowed goal left players and supporters feeling they had been denied a huge moment.

Final Verdict

The decision may still divide opinion, but the law itself is clear.

A defender standing on the goal line does not automatically keep an attacker onside.

The key question is whether two Egyptian players were between the Iranian attacker and the goal line when the ball was played.

Advertisement

If only one Egyptian player was deeper than the attacker, the offside decision was correct.

That is why Iran’s late goal against Egypt was ruled out despite appearing onside to many fans at first glance.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

WWE Night of Champions 2026 card: Complete list of matches set for Saturday in Saudi Arabia

Published

on

WWE Night of Champions sets the stage for SummerSlam. Undisputed WWE champion Cody Rhodes is set to defend his title in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as part of the event taking place on Saturday, June 27. The King and Queen of the Ring tournament finals also take place, with the winners challenging for world titles at the company’s next two-day spectacle, SummerSlam.

The build to those matches has been quite interesting. King of the Ring sees a rising star taking on a former world heavyweight champion when Oba Femi faces Jey Uso. Both men have made their intentions clear that they plan to challenge Cody Rhodes if they win. However, Femi still has a Brock Lesnar-sized issue in his back pocket to handle as the two have traded wins in their two meetings. Uso, meanwhile, is looking to bring more gold back to the family as he and his brother Jimmy have joined back with Roman Reigns.

In the women’s match, Liv Morgan has made her intentions clear that she wants to unify the two world titles as she currently holds the women’s world title. Standing in her way of doing that is Iyo Sky, the former champion looking to get back to the top of the singles scene.

The expected main event sees a triple threat match for the undisputed WWE title. Rhodes has to deal with two opponents on Saturday night when he faces both Gunther and Sami Zayn. Rhodes has been at odds with Gunther for weeks and now Zayn has entered the mix. Zayn walked out on Rhodes as Gunther locked him in a sleeper hold and then served as a special guest referee for Rhodes vs. Gunther two weeks ago. He counted a pin for Rhodes in that instance but still drew the ire of “The American Nightmare” for how things have escalated. Now all three men look to settle their differences on Saturday.

Advertisement

Plus, a steel cage match is set to finally bring an end to the rivalry between Bron Breakker and Seth Rollins. The pair of former Vision allies have battled each other for weeks since Breakker returned from injury. Now, the two meet in the unforgiving structure that’s sure to produce some brutal results.

Take a look below at the confirmed matches for Night of Champions. The event streams live on ESPN Unlimited on June 27 with the main card starting at 1 p.m. ET.

Advertisement

2026 WWE Night of Champions matches

Undisputed WWE Championship — Cody Rhodes (c) vs. Gunther vs. Sami Zayn: Rhodes wants to squash two pests at once. The champion is stuck in a time loop, defending his throne against Gunther, who keeps getting rematches after unclear outcomes. Rhodes’ estranged friend Zayn has contributed to the chaos. Rhodes demanded to defend the title against both men in a triple threat match.

King of the Tournament Finals Jey Uso vs. Oba Femi: One of these men will go on to challenge for the world heavyweight championship at SummerSlam. Both advanced to the semifinals by winning fatal four-way matches. Femi and Uso defeated Dominik Mysterio and Je’Von Evans, respectively, to guarantee a spot at Night of Champions.

Queen of the Ring Tournament Finals Iyo Sky vs. Liv Morgan: Sky and Morgan enter the tournament finals with different objectives. Sky looks to become a world champion again. Morgan, already the women’s world champion, has her eyes on SmackDown’s top prize in an effort to run both shows. Only one of them has the potential to see it through after becoming Queen of the Ring.

Seth Rollins vs. Bron Breakker (Steel Cage match): Rollins and Breakker seek a definitive end to their issues. The former allies have been at odds since Breakker and Bronson Reed ousted Rollins from The Vision. Rollins comeback at WrestleMania was spoiled by Breakker, exacerbating their problems. A steel cage could be the perfect environment to settle things.

Advertisement

Women’s United States Championship — Tiffany Stratton (c) vs. Jade Cargill: One year after becoming Queen of the Ring, Cargill seeks more gold. Last year, Cargill unsuccessfully challenged Stratton for the WWE women’s title after winning the tournament. Now Cargill has a second chance to take gold from her enemy.

United States Championship — Trick Williams (c) vs. Ricky Saints: Former NXT champion Ricky Starks gets his first crack at main roster gold. Starks earned a shot at Williams by defeating Carmelo Hayes in a title eliminator. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Raul Fernandez blasts track limits penalty after sprint win: ‘It makes MotoGP boring’

Published

on

Raul Fernandez says he channelled “his anger” over a track limits penalty in qualifying to claim his first MotoGP sprint win of 2026 at the Dutch Grand Prix.

Fernandez set the fastest time in Saturday morning’s qualifying session and was seen celebrating his provisional pole position with two minutes remaining on the clock.

Advertisement

However, the Trackhouse rider soon lost his best time due to a track limits infringement, with replays showing the rear tyre of his Aprilia just gently crossing the white line as he accelerated out of the final corner.

Advertisement

The sanction left him fourth and behind the remaining Aprilias on the grid, but he bounced back strongly in the sprint, passing polesitter Jorge Martin into the final chicane on lap 3.

Speaking after the podium ceremony, Fernandez admitted that he was frustrated by the rule regarding track limits in qualifying, which he felt is making MotoGP “boring”.

Advertisement

“This morning, I was quite angry after what happened in quali,” he said. “I think they are making our sport very boring sometimes. I don’t really agree [with the penalty].

Advertisement

“If I make a mistake, I accept the consequences.

“Apart from that I used this bad energy or this moment where I was quite angry to put all together in the sprint.

“I am very happy because we are working so well. I am really happy with the work that we are doing. It’s really important for the team and for me to be in this position. It’s the first time we made 1-2.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Raul Fernandez, Trackhouse Racing

Raul Fernandez, Trackhouse Racing

Raul Fernandez, Trackhouse Racing

Fernandez’s second sprint win in four weekends comes at an important time of the season, as he negotiates a new contract with Trackhouse.

While there were initially some doubts about his future at the American team, his recent performances have boosted his chances of securing another contract for 2027 and beyond.

Asked how this result can impact his future, the Spaniard said: “For sure, it’s important. But the things that don’t depend on myself, I am not really thinking about those.

Advertisement

Advertisement

“I am really working on myself, trying to do my best. And if tomorrow I have another opportunity, I will try.

“Since two or three races, we are talking with Trackhouse. We had some nice talks. When we made our first match in ‘24, the team was almost finishing in the last positions and I was almost in the last positions , so I think we did a really good job together.

“I think it is time to make everything [work] in that way to be continued in the future. But it is something that doesn’t depend on me. I have the people around me who are working on that.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Read Also:

MotoGP Dutch GP: Raul Fernandez leads Trackhouse Aprilia 1-2 in sprint

Guenther Steiner: Maverick Vinales blaming KTM “not the smartest thing to do”

To read more Motorsport.com articles visit our website.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

3 reasons why India are in serious danger of losing the IRE vs IND 2026 T20I series 2-0

Published

on

Ireland got the better of India by 34 runs at Civil Service Cricket Club in Belfast on Friday, June 26 in the first T20I of the two-match series. With the historic win, the Irish side registered their first ever triumph over India in international cricket.

Bowling first after winning the toss in the first T20I, India conceded 182 runs while picking up nine wickets. Captain Lorcan Tucker led from the front with 50 off 36 balls, while Gareth Delany chipped in with a crucial 49 off 32 balls. For India, Harshit Rana claimed three wickets, while Arshdeep Singh and Axar Patel chipped in with two scalps each.

In the chase, Abhishek Sharma (49 off 20) got the Men in Blue off to a brisk start, hitting seven fours and two sixes. However, the rest of the batting line-up failed as India fell way short of the target in the end. In the wake of India’s shock loss on Friday in Belfast, we look at three reasons why the Men in Blue are in serious danger of losing the T20I series 2-0.


#1 India’s T20I batting has time and again been exposed in bowling-friendly conditions

Team India may have won the last two T20 World Cups, but it is pretty clear that their batters struggle when they have to play on bowling-friendly surfaces once in a while in T20I cricket. India’s only loss in the 2026 T20 World Cup came in the Super 8 clash against South Africa in Ahmedabad. The Proteas bowlers troubled India with back-of-length and off-pace deliveries.

Just like the wicket in Ahmedabad, the surface in Belfast is also not a batting paradise. There is enough help in it for pacers and spin bowlers. The bounce is somewhat two-paced and India’s batters clearly found it difficult to hit boundaries. Most of the aerial strokes went straight into the hands of Ireland’s fielders.

The manner in which India’s batters kept perishing one after the other should be a matter of concern for the team management. It would be fair to say that there was a hint of arrogance as well in the manner in which they about their chase, not showing much respect for the conditions. Some of the strokes were uncalled for, with batters literally gifting their wickets away instead of grinding it out.

Advertisement

#2 Short turnaround time between two T20Is

Another major reason why Ireland would fancy their chances of a 2-0 victory over India is the short turnaround time between the two T20Is. The first match was played on Friday, while the second game will be held on Sunday. The Men in Blue batters failed to get a hang of the conditions in the first T20Is, and there is not much they can do now other than preparing mentally for the challenge on Sunday.

The likes of skipper Shreyas Iyer, Tilak Varma and Ishan Kishan need to take a closer look at the mode of their dismissals in the first T20I. Yes, it is absolutely true that India have tasted amazing success by adapting an ultra-aggressive approach with the willow in T20Is. However, at times, the horses for courses approach also needs to be looked at. The pitch in Belfast definitely warrants a change in strategy.


#3 Ireland’s bowling looks better suited to conditions in Belfast

Looking at the bowling performance of the two teams in the first T20I in Belfast, it definitely appears as if Ireland’s bowlers are better suited to exploit the conditions on offer. Left-arm pacer Jai Moondra and right-arm pacer Matthew Hollard were both on debut. However, the two bowlers exploited the conditions brilliantly to put India on the backfoot in the first T20I, combining to pick up five big wickets.

Matthew Humphreys also overcame a poor start to finish with a three-fer. In contrast, India’s bowlers struggled to find efficiency and consistency. Harshit Rana stood out with 3-24, while Arshdeep Singh (2-28) also impressed. However, Prasidh Krishna looked totally out of sync, conceding 57 runs in four wicketless overs. Even Axar Patel went for a few even though he claimed two wickets.

Advertisement

It is important to note that India are without the services of Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj and Hardik Pandya for the Ireland and England T20Is. So, there is some inexperience in the Indian bowling that Ireland’s batters can expose. Unless India’s bowlers can quickly find the right lines and lengths to bowl on Sunday, they could find themselves under the pump yet again in Belfast.