OpenAI is weighing up handing the US government a 5 per cent stake worth $43bn (£32bn) as Sam Altman moves to shore up relations with Donald Trump ahead of the ChatGPT maker’s blockbuster stock market debut.

The offer, first reported by the Financial Times, has been tabled in recent discussions with the White House as the company prepares for a $1tn flotation in New York, a listing that would rank among the largest in corporate history.

Trump has made no secret of his enthusiasm for the American taxpayer taking stakes in the leading AI developers, describing the prospect as a “beautiful thing” that would make the public rich. “There’s something very interesting about it, where it almost becomes a partnership with the American public,” he said last month. “You make them partners in this revolution. It would be a beautiful thing. It would make them rich.”

The logic behind the proposal is as much political as financial. Handing the public a direct interest in AI’s upside is seen as a way of blunting the growing backlash over the technology’s impact on jobs, a concern Altman himself has wrestled with publicly, and the relentless spread of energy-hungry data centres. Altman has previously floated the idea of a public wealth fund holding stakes in AI companies, and reports suggest he envisages rivals such as Anthropic, Google and Meta ceding similar holdings through a government vehicle.

OpenAI is currently valued at $852bn, putting a 5 per cent stake at roughly $43bn. Should the flotation hit its $1tn target, the government’s paper gain would be immediate, a point unlikely to be lost on a president who has boasted about the returns from Washington’s 10 per cent stake in Intel, taken last year at $9bn and now worth more than $60bn.

Quite where any OpenAI shares would sit remains up for debate. JD Vance, the vice-president, has said Trump favours a sovereign wealth fund, while others in the administration have suggested parking the holdings in “Trump accounts”, the investment accounts for children being established by the president. Bernie Sanders, the left-wing senator, has gone considerably further, arguing the public should own half of the AI companies outright.

The talks mark a striking shift in Washington’s posture. Having initially taken a hands-off approach to AI, the White House has become increasingly interventionist in recent months, blocking the release of Anthropic’s most powerful systems and forcing OpenAI to restrict access to its latest models, moves made against a backdrop of intensifying competition from China.

Anthropic, for its part, has proposed special taxes on the AI sector to fund a “digital dividend” for the public, a rather different route to the same political destination.

OpenAI, whose staff shared a $6.6bn payout in a secondary share sale last year, was approached for comment.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

For months, policymakers, businesses and trade watchers in Washington had been bracing for a turbulent spring and summer around the future of the USMCA, the trade pact binding the United States, Canada and Mexico.

But, to quote former UK Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, “Events, dear boy, events.” The war with Iran has dominated Washington’s attention, stripping away much of the political heat that was expected to surround the pact’s renewal.

Instead of a noisy fight over the agreement’s future, the USMCA has slipped into the background. The Iran conflict has absorbed the White House’s attention and, in practical terms, has become one of the best developments for keeping the trade pact out of the headlines.

Earlier this year, there were concerns the US might use the renewal window to force a confrontation with Canada and Mexico, or even threaten withdrawal. President Trump had already cooled on the deal he once signed, raising questions about how aggressively Washington would approach the next phase.

But with foreign policy dominating the administration’s agenda, the US has taken a more measured approach. It has confirmed it will not extend the agreement for another 16 years, while stopping short of more dramatic action.

Part of that restraint reflects a belief inside the administration that the trade relationship has already been reshaped.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer argues the White House’s tariff strategy has fundamentally altered North America’s economic ties, changing the balance with Canada and Mexico in ways that make a more confrontational approach unnecessary. But if trade does become more politically driven, the US auto industry could be the biggest loser.

British households have taken the heaviest hit to their wealth of any advanced economy since the pandemic, a sobering benchmark for a country that once prided itself on rising prosperity.

The average Briton is now more than a fifth poorer than five years ago, according to UBS. Of the 37 countries the Swiss bank surveyed, none has seen a steeper decline.

Typical individual wealth has dropped by roughly £28,500 since 2020 once inflation is stripped out, leaving the median adult with assets of just over £95,500 last year. That makes the British marginally better off than the French, but poorer than the Dutch and the Italians, a ranking that would have seemed improbable a decade ago.

Wealth here is measured by the value of assets such as property and shares, and it has been eroded at pace after inflation surged in the wake of the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Britain absorbed a worse inflation shock than most of its peers as energy costs jumped, a squeeze that continues to shape the wider picture on living standards.

A cooling housing market has deepened the slump. Remarkably, British families have fared worse over the past five years than households in Turkey, Bulgaria, Mexico and Kazakhstan.

The UBS findings underline the scale of the task facing Andy Burnham as he prepares to become the next prime minister. In his first major speech since returning to the Commons, the MP for Makerfield said this week: “We cannot go through another decade like the one we have just had. We need a new determination to raise the living standards of every person in this land.”

Separate figures from the Office for National Statistics, published on Tuesday, showed that Sir Keir Starmer had failed to deliver on his pledge to improve living standards, with families now worse off than they were before he entered Downing Street.

The UBS data show the wealth of a typical individual has tumbled by more than 23 per cent on both the mean and median measures since 2020, ground down by a spike in inflation that peaked at 11.1 per cent in October 2022.

Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS Global Wealth Management, said: “The UK had a brief period of notably higher inflation than Europe did, and that has distorted the real numbers. You had a couple of years of quite high inflation, partly because of the various peculiarities of our energy pricing structure.”

The housing market has added to the strain. UK house prices have risen by 26 per cent since the start of 2020, according to the ONS House Price Index, but consumer prices have climbed by 32 per cent over the same stretch, meaning the real value of the money tied up in the typical home has been quietly whittled away.

Donovan added: “There is a considerable weight to real estate as a form of wealth because it is the largest asset that most people own. A change in the relative performance of your local real estate market can have a notable bearing on, in particular, the median wealth level over time.”

The fall in wealth has landed alongside incomes that have struggled to keep up with prices, a double squeeze on households. At the same time, the tax burden is set to climb to its highest level since the Second World War, driven in part by the long freeze in income tax thresholds, an issue explored in Business Matters’ coverage of Britain’s record property tax burden.

The picture is not uniformly bleak across the globe. The biggest gains came in South Korea, where average wealth rose 55 per cent, along with Russia and Croatia. Among G7 economies, the largest rise was in Japan, where median wealth climbed 51 per cent.

The data arrived as the Institute of Directors said business confidence fell again in June. Anna Leach, the group’s chief economist, said it pointed to an urgent need for ministers to back economic growth.

“Businesses need to see meaningful improvements in areas like regulatory cost, tax complexity and swiftness and consistency of government decisions to fundamentally unlock spending and get growth going,” she said.

A Treasury spokesman was more upbeat: “We have the right economic plan. Inflation is holding steady, the UK led G7 growth at the start of the year, and the IMF and OECD have both upgraded growth forecasts. Real wages have risen more in the last year than in the first ten years of the previous government.” That claim of steadier prices chimes with the latest ONS inflation reading, though for many households the damage to accumulated wealth has already been done.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement